User talk:B: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:28, 29 February 2008 editPGPirate (talk \| contribs)Pending changes reviewers6,290 edits →East Carolina Pirates football seasons: added comment← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 17:36, 5 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,394 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:B/Archive 9) (bot
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{/header}}
	{{Virginia Tech ribbon}}

	<div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; right:55px; top:10px;" class="metadata" id="administrator">
			{{NOINDEX}}
	<imagemap>
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
	Image:NIU ribbon.svg\|20px\|February 14, 2008 - never forget
			\| algo = old(120d)
	rect 0 0 1000 1000 ]
			\| archive = User talk:B/Archive %(counter)d
	desc none
			\| counter = 9
	</imagemap>
			\| maxarchivesize = 150K
			\| archiveheader = {{Aan}}
			\| minthreadstoarchive = 1
			\| minthreadsleft = 10
			}}
			{{archive box\|search=no\|auto=short}}
			<!-- Please leave the above lines alone. Add new discussions at the bottom of the page. -->

			==Season Greetings==
			<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FFD700; background: #FFB924; border-width:4px; text-align:center; padding:7px; height:220px;" class="plainlinks">]
			{{font\|text=''' Merry Christmas {{BASEPAGENAME}}'''\|size=30px}}<br /><br /><br />{{font\|size=17px\|text=Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,<br />
			May next year be prosperous and joyful.<br />
			–] <sup>]</sup> 10.43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)}}
	</div>		</div>
			== WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2024 ==
	]

	]
			{\| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF"
	{{Notice\|'''Few things in life are as annoying at the {{tl\|Talkback}} template. If I leave you a personal message (not a pro forma notification of an image deletion) I probably am watching your talk page and will notice a reply there. If you want to reply here, that's fine too. If you want to simply start a new section and type "I have replied to your message on my talk page," even that is ok. But if you leave this silly template on my talk page, it will be ignored.'''}}
			\|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" \|
	<div style="border:solid 1px black;background:#f0fff0">Because of privacy concerns, I no longer maintain separate archive pages. One of the worst policy decisions Misplaced Pages has made is to allow user and user talk edits to be indexed by search engines. This creates a space that is largely unmonitored for libel and nonsense, but is nonetheless the top g-hit for any relevant search term. For previous comments on my talk page, see , , , or ].
			\|rowspan="2" \|
	</div>
			\|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; \|]'''<big>]</big>''' '''\|''' <small>May 2024</small>
	{\| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small\|}}}\|yes\|small\|standard}}-talk"
			<br />
	\|-
			'''Notes for May:'''<br>
	\|]
			*Looking for something to work on? Try looking at, ].
	\|On ], ], ''']''' was updated with {{#if:{{{4\|}}}\|facts\|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4\|}}}\|s\|}} ''''']'''''{{#if:{{{4\|}}}\|{{#if:{{{5\|}}}\|, \|, and}} ''''']'''''
			:Some important articles that need help: ], ], ], ], ]
	}}{{#if:{{{5\|}}}\|{{#if:{{{6\|}}}\|, \|, and}} ''''']'''''
			* We are working to develop a featured portal, ].<br />
	}}{{#if:{{{6\|}}}\|, and ''''']'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
			*Looking for a new project? perhaps authoring an article on'' ]''

			'''Other ways to participate:'''
			* ] '''\|''' ]
			* ] '''\|''' ] '''\|''' {{watch\|Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Scouting/Article alerts}}
	\|}		\|}
			--] <sup>(])</sup> May 22, 2024

	== Request ==

			<noinclude>]</noinclude>
	If you've got the time, do you think you could throw together a ] navbox that we could throw at the bottom of the Tech bowl game articles? You're a lot better at box syntax than I, and I think it'd be a good thing to have to connect all 21 (and counting) Virginia Tech bowl game articles we'll have when I move beyond the keystone article. That, and it'd look really nice on the Featured Topic page one of these days. :) If you're too busy, I can try to tackle it; just let me know. Thanks! ] (]) 00:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:TheDoctorWho@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Scouting/Members/delivery&oldid=1223364509 -->
	:Done. See {{tl\|Virginia Tech bowl games}}. --] (]) 02:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
	::Looks pretty snazzy. Nice work, and thanks! ] (]) 04:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
	Oh, I forgot... do you have any pictures that could be used for some of the older bowl game articles? I'll be asking on TSL eventually, I'm sure, but you're the guy on the spot, and if you have any, it'd be really helpful. I think I've got a few of the Insight Bowl, but I'll have to dig for them. ] (]) 05:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
	:No - didn't have a camera at any bowl other than the CFA bowl in 06. --] (]) 15:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
	::Bummer. I'll have to email Autiger to see if he's got any pictures of the '05 Sugar Bowl, then. ] (]) 08:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
	I've nominated ] as a potential featured list. Does it look all right to you? ] (]) 06:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
	:It needs something more. What about a mini infobox for each game that gives the game name, opponent, date, and scoring summary? I'm going to make {{tl\|NCAAFootballSingleGameHeaderMini}} from {{tl\|NCAAFootballSingleGameHeader}} and try it out. --] (]) 13:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
	I've added it for the first few ... you can decide whether or not you like having it in there ... but I just think that a featured list is going to need something visual (as opposed to prose) to get approved. --] (]) 13:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

	== ~~Question~~ ==		== Precious anniversary ==
			{{User QAIbox/auto\|years=Nine}}
			I don't know if you know that your entry leads the list ;) - Your edit notice makes me point at ] where a reviewer and I can't agree yet, and I hope for independent eyes. --] (]) 05:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
			: Thank you for your message. Please see ] for a process for requesting a third opinion. Unfortunately I do not have the time to devote to this at the moment. --] (]) 21:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

			== Deleting File:614+znGMXnL. SR600,315 PIWhiteStrip,BottomLeft,0,35 PIStarRatingFOURANDHALF,BottomLeft,360,-6 SR600,315 ZA31,445,290,400,400,AmazonEmberBold,12,4,0,0,5 SCLZZZZZZZ FMpng BG255,255,255.png: ==
	Hi B. I have a question about the way things work around here that I wanted to ask. How long does an article have to be tagged as sounding like a personal essay before it can be deleted (as in the case of the article on ])? I tried to clean up the intro but it is so poorly written that I'm not sure if it can be salvaged. What is typically done in such cases? I am not necessarily interested in rewriting the article myself, but something has to be done about it. Thanks for your help. ] (]) 02:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
	:Those "maintenance tags" are not a part of the deletion process. ], for example, goes back three years. Those tags are basically just messages that say "someone else should take care of this problem". I'm going to go ahead and nominate it for deletion. There will be a link to a discussion page at the top once I'm done. See ] for more information on nominating something for deletion. --] (]) 02:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

			Hi, I'm ], and I am letting you know that I am using ] on a draft that you cannot see yet, because I haven't figured out how to save a draft before publishing. ] (]) 20:03, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
	== Whitelist/blacklist issue ==

			== B-bot needs to check templates which use images and what links there ==
	Hi - could you comment on ] please. You added the site to the blacklist but there seems to be nothing in the way of logging or other request that I can see. Thanks --] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">]</span></small></sup></b> 08:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
	:This is obviously a spammy non-notable blog with a very high ad/content ratio. There is a massive effort to spam a particular group of fansites - see ] for a list of ones I have seen. All of these appear to be owned by the same person/company/whatever. The Tyrod site does not appear related to the rest of these, but I still don't think we should have it here. It doesn't meet our external link policy and actual content is lacking. One of the "articles" is just a link to buy fatheads with an affiliate ID (ie, advertising disguised as an article). One of them is selling "Fire Jim Weaver" t-shirts. (No serious source of Tech information would promote such a thing. Jim Weaver is unquestionably one of the best ADs in the country, TSL trolling notwithstanding.) Three of them are links to youtube videos. This is just a spam site and absolutely should not be permitted here. --] (]) 15:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
	::Thanks a lot - I've closed it --] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">]</span></small></sup></b> 16:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

			Hello, your bot marked an imaged I'd uploaded for deletion. I fully understand you may be absent for a while -- a cursory review of my own talk and contributions says I'm away much more often then you are, so I fully agree there are things more important in life than Misplaced Pages. However, because of the short timeline your bot acts on, and because you might not respond for a while, and because there's apparently no oversight on what your bot is doing, and because it doesn't follow the chain of where an image is used, I raised the issue where you suggested to on the bot talk page: "Please ask at WP:HELPDESK. That page is monitored and will get you a rapid response." I made a new section/discussion at ]. ] (]) 03:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
	==Thank you==
			:{{ping\|Banaticus}} it looks like your question was answered there. Non-free images are not permitted in templates or article drafts. The bot will tag those as orphaned. If you are drafting an article, you can put a placeholder image in there until the article is ready to move to the mainspace. Then you can upload the image as the very last thing when you are ready to promote the article. If you need to have a non-free image in the infobox, then make a parameter for "image" and fill in the parameter from the article. --] (]) 12:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
	As for staying away from Daedalus, I have no reason to go anywhere near him. I had never heard of him until he started reverting me on those users' talk pages. So long as he leaves me alone there's no reason we should ever come across each other again. -- ] (]) 05:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
	:You're welcome. Glad to help. In the future, if a similar issue comes up, please feel free to contact me to ask for help and/or a third opinion. --] (]) 05:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

			== RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review ==
	== ] ==

			Hi there! The trial of the <strong>RfA discussion-only period</strong> passed at ] has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at ''']'''. Cheers, and happy editing! ] (]) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
	Hey, you wrote <blockquote>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Theleekycauldron@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/2024_review/Mailing_list&oldid=1223231383 -->
	I don't think you need a separate color for NSC championship vs SC championship since each row tells what conference they were in. (In other words, pick one color for a conference championship.)
	</blockquote> How do you feel about having one box that that says Conference Champions. i.e.
	{\| class="wikitable"
	\|bgcolor="#FFE6BD"\|<small>'''Conference Champions'''</small>
	\|bgcolor="#D0E7FF"\|<small>'''Bowl game berth'''</small>
	\|}
	And the reader can look on the line to see which conference ECU was in. Thanks, ''''']]''''' 01:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
	:Are you a cell borders wiz? I copied this table, hence, I do not know how to manipulate the table as you prescribed. Also, please look at the ref in 2005. How does it look explaining division rankings. If you have any direct questions/comments, please respond on my talkpage. Thanks, ''''']]''''' 01:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
	I've fixed the WWII area. Feel free to tweak the text or add a ref to it. The colors and legend you suggest look fine. As for the 2005 change, I don't know what the right answer is, but if I didn't notice it, a reader might not either. I don't know what the right answer is ... maybe change the conference label to "CUSA Eastern" (or whatever the division is called), then it would be obvious what it is talking about. --] (]) 01:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
	:: Are you suggesting changing the ref to CUSA East (not Eastern:) ) or put it somewhere else? Also, should the colspan stay at 7, where you put it? Or 6, which is between bowl game and AP Poll? I would say colspan 6, but I would like your opinion. Thanks, ''''']]''''' 01:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
	:::I think 7 probably looks the best, otherwise, there's a chunk of a box hanging out in the middle of nowhere. As for CUSA East, I'm suggesting changing the "conference" column to read "CUSA East" or "CUSA (East division)" for 2005, 2006, and 2007. --] (]) 01:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

			== Invitation to participate in a research ==
	::::How does the CUSA East look now? I wasn't quite sure where you thought it should go. If it is not where you thought it should go, please tell me and I will try to fix it. I do believe the CUSA East designation is needed somewhere. Thanks, ''''']]''''' 14:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
	:::::What has changed that I'm looking at? It doesn't look any different. I would change the "Conference USA" label in the 2nd column to "CUSA East" or "Conference USA East" - that makes it more obvious what it is talking about. --] (]) 23:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

			Hello,
	::::::Even though the "division designation" did not happen until the 2005 season? From 1996 - 2004 there was no East, West division. I don't think that would be a good title. Because ECU wasn't in the East division from 1997-2004. ''''']]''''' 23:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::I don't think we're on the same page ... here's what I'm suggesting (good, bad, or indifferent, I don't know - just a suggestion): --] (]) 00:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
	{\| class="wikitable" style="font-size: 95%; width:98%;"
	\|-
	\|align="center"\|2003
	\|align="center"\|Conference USA
	\|align="center"\|10
	\|align="center"\|1
	\|align="center"\|10
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|-
	\|align="center"\|2004
	\|align="center"\|Conference USA
	\|align="center"\|10
	\|align="center"\|2
	\|align="center"\|9
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|-
	\|align="center"\|2005
	\|align="center"\|Conference USA East
	\|align="center"\|4<ref>Conference USA split into two divisions in 2005. This number indicates the division ranking.</ref>
	\|align="center"\|5
	\|align="center"\|6
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|-
	\|align="center"\|2006
	\|align="center" style="background: #D0E7FF;"\|Conference USA East
	\|align="center" style="background: #D0E7FF;"\|2
	\|align="center"\|7
	\|align="center"\|6
	\|align="center"\|Lost ] vs. ] 24–7
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|-
	\|align="center"\|2007
	\|align="center" style="background: #D0E7FF;"\|Conference USA East
	\|align="center" style="background: #D0E7FF;"\|2
	\|align="center"\|8
	\|align="center"\|5
	\|align="center"\|'''Won''' ] vs. ] 41–38
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|-
	\|align="center"\|2008
	\|align="center"\|Conference USA East
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|align="center"\|—
	\|}

			The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
	::::::::Ohhh, well that makes sense:). I was thinking column title, not horizontal title. Yeh, I like that. I will change it now, and thanks for the advice. ''''']]''''' 00:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

			You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
	==Question re removing incorrect warnings==

	you wrote that "an incorrect warning can be removed by anyone". Is that the general rule? If a user has been warned incorrectly, for something that the warner mistakenly thought was vandalism but actually wasn't, ''is'' it OK to remove the warning? Hu12 that it isn't. I don't know how he came across this page unless he's been checking my contributions (to which I have no objection but it does seem to mean he's looking for something to take me down).
			The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .

			Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

			Kind Regards,

			]

			<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
			<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->

			== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==

			Hello,

			I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].

			Take the survey ''''''.

			Kind Regards,

			]

			<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
			<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->

			== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
			<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2024\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

			If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

			</div>
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->

			== BASTARD ==
	This IP has been used almost exclusively for vandalism, but it made ''one'' edit that, though of marginal utility, wasn't actually vandalism, and wasn't warnable. I assume that the warning editor, primed by the IP's record, didn't consider the case closely enough, and assumed this edit was just like all the others; it was a mistake, so I corrected it by removing the mistaken warning. Every other warning on the page was well-deserved, so I left them, and indeed added one of my own. My question is whether Hu12 is correct that I may not remove a warning that should never have been left, or whether your statement is correct, that incorrect warnings can be removed by anyone?

			You are a whinning little bitch ] (]) 07:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
	-- ] (]) 20:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
	:Are we talking about ? That looks like vandalism to me. I have no idea who Mr. Pena is, but the IP modified someone else's comments and added something that looks like irrelevant nonsense. To answer your question, I doubt there's a written rule anywhere about removing obviously incorrect warnings, but it falls into the category of "things that are obviously a good idea". If someone is a good faith user, we don't want to drive them away by falsely accusing them of vandalism. But in this case, I would not suggest removing the warning - you should only remove the warning (or replace it with a personal message) if the edit was obviously not vandalism. --] (]) 23:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
	:: Sorry, my mistake. I got confused between that edit by a vandal IP, which was indeed properly warned as vandalism, and another edit to the same page by a different vandal IP (since blocked), which was marginally not vandalism. Sometimes these vandal IPs all blend into each other... In this case, of course Hu12 was quite right to replace the warning which I'd mistakenly removed. <emily-litella>Never mind.</emily-litella> -- ] (]) 23:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:36, 5 January 2025

I'm largely inactive / 99% retired. There are more important things in life.

If you're an admin looking to ask about a block or delete I made, feel free to reverse it. If we would grant each other the presumption that we are acting in good faith, we could dispense with some of the drama and long ANI threads. Please don't use the {{talkback}} template - if you have something to say, say it.

If you are asking me to review a situation, please provide links to articles and diffs to the edits in question — I cannot read your mind to figure out what you are talking about.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Season Greetings

Merry Christmas B

Hi B, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
May next year be prosperous and joyful.
–Scopecreep 10.43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2024

WikiProject Scouting | May 2024

Notes for May:

Looking for something to work on? Try looking at, Category:Scouting articles needing attention.

Some important articles that need help: The Scout Association, NAYLE, Philmont Training Center, BSA Leadership Training, COPE

We are working to develop a featured portal, look here if you want to help.
Looking for a new project? perhaps authoring an article on Aids to Scoutmastership

Other ways to participate:

--evrik May 22, 2024

2023-03-01

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

I don't know if you know that your entry leads the list ;) - Your edit notice makes me point at Talk:Gerhard Klingenberg where a reviewer and I can't agree yet, and I hope for independent eyes. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. Please see WP:3O for a process for requesting a third opinion. Unfortunately I do not have the time to devote to this at the moment. --B (talk) 21:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Deleting File:614+znGMXnL. SR600,315 PIWhiteStrip,BottomLeft,0,35 PIStarRatingFOURANDHALF,BottomLeft,360,-6 SR600,315 ZA31,445,290,400,400,AmazonEmberBold,12,4,0,0,5 SCLZZZZZZZ FMpng BG255,255,255.png:

Hi, I'm Rocker338, and I am letting you know that I am using File:614+znGMXnL. SR600,315 PIWhiteStrip,BottomLeft,0,35 PIStarRatingFOURANDHALF,BottomLeft,360,-6 SR600,315 ZA31,445,290,400,400,AmazonEmberBold,12,4,0,0,5 SCLZZZZZZZ FMpng BG255,255,255.png on a draft that you cannot see yet, because I haven't figured out how to save a draft before publishing. Rocker338 (talk) 20:03, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

B-bot needs to check templates which use images and what links there

Hello, your bot marked an imaged I'd uploaded for deletion. I fully understand you may be absent for a while -- a cursory review of my own talk and contributions says I'm away much more often then you are, so I fully agree there are things more important in life than Misplaced Pages. However, because of the short timeline your bot acts on, and because you might not respond for a while, and because there's apparently no oversight on what your bot is doing, and because it doesn't follow the chain of where an image is used, I raised the issue where you suggested to on the bot talk page: "Please ask at WP:HELPDESK. That page is monitored and will get you a rapid response." I made a new section/discussion at Misplaced Pages:Help_desk#Bot_is_marking_images_for_deletion_because_of_non-use,_but_isn't_following_the_full_chain,_and_there's_not_a_great_way_to_chat_about_it. Banaticus (talk) 03:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

@Banaticus: it looks like your question was answered there. Non-free images are not permitted in templates or article drafts. The bot will tag those as orphaned. If you are drafting an article, you can put a placeholder image in there until the article is ready to move to the mainspace. Then you can upload the image as the very last thing when you are ready to promote the article. If you need to have a non-free image in the infobox, then make a parameter for "image" and fill in the parameter from the article. --B (talk) 12:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

BASTARD

You are a whinning little bitch 2802:8012:15:4F00:24BD:7C09:13DC:8C1 (talk) 07:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)