Revision as of 03:20, 10 March 2008 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,229 edits →You've been mentioned at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:09, 19 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(40 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no}} | |||
== Crime in Mexico == | |||
== AWB == | |||
Hi Mhsb: | |||
Sorry but I have your AWB access request. See edit summary for explanation. —] (]) 11:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
I see you have a lot of edits on crime in Latin America and South America. | |||
== ] == | |||
Your edit on crime in Mexico is bound to be reverted because a lot of the statements are unsupported by references. If they are based on reliable sources, it would be a good idea to include them. | |||
I've added some more information.. should be fine now. The artice was created by me as part of ] don´t really know much about it. Cheers! ] (]) 13:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
==excessive speedies== | |||
==Mexico== | |||
Please see WP:STUB. The articles you are placing speedies on are most of them acceptable starts for articles. See WP:CSD for the definition of no context. If it is clear what the article is about, it has context. It is furthermore recommended not to place speedies of articles within the first few minutes of creation when the user may be working on them. Please don't bite the newbiews--and please don;t make extra work for the admins. You could help me clean up things by placing apologies on the user pages where you placed the warnings. Some of the speedies were properly deletable, and i did delete those articles, but sometimes using a more appropriate reason ''']''' (]) 14:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
I do not know if you are a new user here, but I invite you to ''discuss'' instead of engaging in a rather unfortunate edit war. Calling someone a VANDAL for editing/removing/questioning your edits is not appropriate and a violation of ]. Per ], especially when dealing with controversial topics, you ''must'' obtain the consensus of the editors. You might want to review what truly constitutes ], before calling someone a vandal. Moreover, the very nature of Misplaced Pages is free editing, you shouldn't be surprised, nor upset—much less resort to personal disqualifications—when another user challenges your edits. Like you aptly pointed out, this is not a personal encyclopedia (i.e. ''yours''), but everybody's. Please, discuss, and ''obtain'' the consensus of the editors. | |||
::Your good intentions are recognized, but read WP:Deletion policy and WP:CSD carefully before you go back to it; then go do some PROD first, one or two at a time, and work up from there as you see how it goes. PROD is the safe thing to do when in doubt. I'll keep an eye out. ''']''' (]) 23:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
== AWB Again == | |||
Given your insistence on reverting without addressing the concerns expressed at ], I have requested the assistance of administrators and the full protection of the page. Please discuss, so that a '''true''' consensus and ''compromise'' is reached. We ''all'' build Misplaced Pages. | |||
Declined again. You must have more then 500 edits to article space to be considered. Please do not apply again until you have reached this milestone. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 10:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Cheers, | |||
--] 21:34, 23 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
== My apologies == | |||
:Please stop your unconstructive behavior. We have already agreed that a section on crime is appropriate but disagree with the way you wish to present it. Please ''discuss'' and do not resort again to personal attacks and disqualifications. --] 00:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
I would like to apologize for failing to notify you in regards to ] at the ]. It was a honest mistake in ] - nothing personal. Please see my ]. --] (]) 04:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
== February 2008 == | |||
==CIA figures== | |||
] Hi, the <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> ''']]''' <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 00:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Sure they are, check here <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
==Your recent edits== | |||
:Yes, I know, but that CIA data, I suppose that those statistics are from the World Bank though... Let's see if someone else will raise the question about that. Cheers. | |||
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 00:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
--] (]) 22:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
== |
== AWB *again* == | ||
Please be aware that there is ] rule in Misplaced Pages, in which a user should avoid edit-warring. At ], you have engaged in an edit war and reverted an article four times in less than 24 hours. Please discuss with the editors involved in stead of engaging in systematic reversions. --] 00:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
You have still not made the 500 mainspace edits that you need to be considered for this tool. Your current count is 294. See the number next to "mainspace" . ] 00:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Don't fool yourself== | |||
Perhaps you should read the entire article before brining spurious accusations. Let's recap: | |||
* You have ] a particular POV with ] wording. | |||
* You resorted to personal insults and attacks, as well as ] argumentation. ("nationalistic", "patriotic", "you should travel a lot"). Perhaps ''you'' are the one who should travel, I do not live in Mexico, but have lived in three continents and travel extensively. But that doesn't make my arguments anymore truer than yours. What makes my arguments stand is that our proposals on a section on "Crime and Law Enforcement" are compliant with ], ] and ]. We have also argued that economic issues should be discussed in the appropriate section, but that two different subjects should not be mixed. You have conveniently ignored our concerns and questions. | |||
* You have disrupted other articles and falsely accused others of doing the same by assigning the actions of Supaman to every one who disagrees with you (currently ''all'' editors at ]). | |||
Please contribute constructively. Like you aptly pointed out, this is the wikipedia where everybody edits. Do not be surprised when five users question your edits. | |||
--] 01:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Replaceable fair use Image:Amritaps cheema.jpg == | |||
] | |||
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please: | |||
# Go to ] and edit it to add {{tlx|di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, '''without deleting the original replaceable fair use template'''. | |||
==Several points to note== | |||
# On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
Per ]: | |||
* An editor can edit his or her own comments if they are not part of a debate of which other users may have already posted a response. You deleted ''another'' users comments. Since you inserted a comment at ] about editing the article because of a discussion at ], you provided the link that Opinoso followed to express his opinion. I repeat, you cannot delete another user's comments. | |||
Per ]: | |||
* It is recommended that you do not blank your discussion page. Archiving is recommended. | |||
--] 00:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Opinioso did not attack you, like I said you provided the link. Secondly, I never said you ''should not'' delete your talk page, I said it is recommended. You didn't need to cite the policy that I already paraphrased to you in my previous comment. Please read the second bullet, and you'll see what I actually said. --] 00:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Under that same standards, we should have deleted your comments from ]. --] 01:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Sure, you direclty insulted us, but we cannot delete them because they were "related" with the discussion? You gotta be kidding me right? --] 01:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::What affiliation? I have no idea what you're talking about, but your spurious accusations do not suprise me. Maybe you haven't noticed, but there is a Canadian, an American, a Spaniard and a Mexican opposing your edits at ]. I really do not know what you are talking about. --] 01:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, ], or by taking a picture of it yourself. | |||
==Catalan people== | |||
Ha, now you are following my contributions? That is indeed funny, just disagreeing because I said it, for the sake of disagreeing. Given your opinion there, I guess you know very little of the subject. "Buyers beware": get ready for an avalanche of responses from Spanish Centralists... you don't know what you just got yourself into. --] 01:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Really? I am following the contributions of ''other'' users? Do you mean "you"? Don't worry, I have more important things to do. But what a coincidence that you arrived at ]. You should wait to see the responses you'll get... =) --] 01:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before ] ]), per our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> ]] 13:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Mexico City== | |||
This is getting interesting. You keep on following my contributions... (cyber-] perhaps?) =) Reverting again for the sake of reverting? I mean, did you actually write something at ]? Gee... | |||
==Rio== | |||
In any case, please read ]. Images should be used when they illustrate a point in the section, not as decoration. Misplaced Pages is not supposed to be neither an album nor a repository of media files. A link—which already exists—to is the way to go. | |||
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from {{#if:Rio de Janeiro|]|Misplaced Pages}}. When removing text, please specify a reason in the ] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the {{#if:Rio de Janeiro|<span class="plainlinks"></span>|]}}. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> Please take a close look at what you're reverting. you're removing valid citations, and fact tags which are permitted under ]. inclusion of such information is not vandalism nor major changes to the article ] (]) 23:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
: you don't need consensus to add references or fact tags. Misplaced Pages is an open edit encyclopaedia. ] (]) 02:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
--] 01:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
:You are kidding me right? After all your offenses and the evident fact that you followed my contributions just to argue against whatever I said, you say I offended you? I urge you to take this project seriously; maybe you didn't start with your right foot with your first contributions; better to rectify and to work constructively that to bring spurious accusations against other users. Given your recent comments, and the fact that you continue to disrupt other articles without a reason, but just because you have a personal vendetta against me, you leave me no choice but to report you to the administrator board. Until then, --] 03:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I really don't know if I should laugh, or if I should feel offended. I have never attacked you: you did several times at ], where you resorted to ] argumentations to justify your claims. Then you disrupted ] and ] just to make a point., . At least ''five'' different users have asked you to rectify your actions and make more constructive edits. | |||
::You followed my contributions and reverted my edits without a reason at ] and opposed anything I said at ]. You may edit any article—even if you follow my contributions—but at least do it with a justified reason, to make a better Misplaced Pages, not just out of a personal vendetta against me. There was absolutely no reason why you reverted at ]. The images do not comply with ]: An anonymous user inserted five images, one of disproportionate size at +300 px inside a table: I justified the deletion of ''only two'' images, kept the rest, and standardized the sizes of all (as recommended in the Manual of Style). What reasons do you have for reverting it? Are you ''truly'' concerned with presenting the image of a French-architecture house of ] in Mexico City? Are you truly concerned in the complexities of ]? | |||
::Maybe you should ''read'' the policies you so aptly cite. "Legal" threats or "violence" threats are unacceptable. Telling you that I will report your unconstructive edits is ''not'' a threat, it is part of the ]. | |||
::But don't worry, you can present all your arguments and your before an administrator. Since it seems that you must have the last word in all our conversations, you can have it. It is too late, and I am tired of reading recurrent spurious accusations against me. I will not respond. We can meet at the administrator board, or at the dispute resolution process, if you may. If not, just take a breath, rectify your actions, and we will meet in a more constructive discussion tomorrow in the various articles you are participating at. | |||
::Cheers mate, | |||
::--] 03:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Hello, what are you doing?== | |||
Look, you've been editing every topic related to Latin America, I just don't know what you're trying to do, you just can't expect people to take your edits seriously when you're having this attitude, you couldn't do your edits to Mexico then you go to Brazil and now to Mexico City and the rest of Latin America, if you keep on going like that someone's going to call an administrator to check on you. ] (]) 17:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
== |
==October 2008== | ||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Rio de Janeiro|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 02:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thank you for your change in tone and willingness to dialogue in your last comment. It is well noted and commended. I am more than willing to start anew, and to try to reach a compromised solution in the many articles we are currently editing. | |||
* Regarding ], there seems to be a deadlock in your proposal, being objected by several users. I will make a proposal in the near future, in line with what has been discussed (law enforcement structure and several statistics that you showed). | |||
* Regarding ], I think it is relevant to talk about the carnival and soccer. We must beware, however, not to write an introduction with ]s. I think that as long as the article gives due weight to these renown traits of Brazilian culture in the appropriate sections we're on the right track. | |||
* Regarding ], I still fail to see the need to keep five pictures clustered into a two paragraph section, one of which is of disproportionate size. I ask you to reconsider your position. | |||
* Regarding ], IMHO, the article is valid, but there are some issues that need to be addressed: | |||
:*The first one is that you are not paraphrasing. You are citing sources, which is good, but you copied the text of the sources word-by-word. You must not copy sections of text from different sources and then paste them in an article without changing the words (that is what I meant by a "verbatim" copy, which if you are not careful, may border on plagiarism). You should ], or if you cite the words of a very specific person, s/he must be properly identified by name, and his/her words need to be in quotation marks. I can help you paraphrase some of the sections, but please keep note of that in your future contributions. You can review ], which has a good deal of advise on how to use sources, how to paraphrase and how to cite. | |||
:*The second issue is that you are presenting a very specific point of view (i.e. POV) of a group of social scientists that directly associate crime and violence to economic hindrances. Again, this is good, but it is only presenting a partial analysis of the subject (i.e. it is an essay). It is recommended that you present analyses of all pertinent authorities, even if they seem contradictory. An encyclopedia article, as a ], should present all POVs, citing all authorities without endorsing any particular thesis; and most of all, write about ]. In this particular case, I recommend that you review the very comprehensive analysis on Poverty in Latin America written by the ]. It is full of statistics and give a ''descriptive'' review, rather than a ''proscriptive'' approach. I also recommend that you include the affirmative actions taken by the various governments in Latin America and their results. For example, the drastic reduction in kidnappings and violence in Colombia during Uribe's administration, or the recent role of the armed forces in Mexico in certain cities to hamper drug-traffic activities and the political implications it has had. That way the article would have a very complete review of the situation, and not just the opinion of a couple of social scientists. | |||
Let me know what you think, | |||
--] 02:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
== November 2008 == | |||
::As promised, I made a proposal regarding crime in Mexico. Let me know what you think. --] 02:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without ] a ]{{#if:James Webb Space Telescope|, as you did to ],}} is not consistent with our policy of ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with ], please take this opportunity to add references to the article. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> -''']'''<sub>]</sub> 03:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
== Vandalism == | |||
] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ], as well as our subject-specific ]. | |||
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-inc-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ]] 13:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Please, stop doing vandalism in my talk page. ] (]) 16:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
==AfD nomination of Project Roony== | |||
== User:Opinoso == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ]] 14:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hi! I warned him. However, I request you to always start a discussion in the article's talk page when you add a tag to the article, explaining why you added the tag. If possible, try to fix the article's problems (for example: if the article is unsourced, try adding reliable sources) before adding a tag. --] (]) 01:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Mhsb, stop following and reverting Opinoso's contributions, as this kind of behavior is ] and you can be blocked for that. I also suggest you to start a discussion in the article's talk page if you disagree with Opinoso's edits, so a consensus can be reached, as this will prevent an unnecessary edit war. You and Opinoso are disagreeing in two articles, ] and ], so I suggest you both to find a ]. I also asked Opinoso to stop calling you a vandal. --] (]) 03:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Please delete the article.--] (]) 02:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Since renaming/moving this article is clearly controversial, I suggest proposing a move first, and arguing your case in the Talk Page before doing any changes. You can do this by adding a "split" template to the page. I would suggest splitting it into two, ] and ]. ] (]) 15:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Request for help == | |||
== You've been mentioned at ] == | |||
I thought it might be a good idea to run a contest or two through the ] to attract editors to improve country coverage on Misplaced Pages, especially the ]. | |||
Hello Mhsb. You are welcome to join ] and give your own opinion. ] (]) 03:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
I noticed you are a member of the WikiProject, and was wondering if you could help. | |||
I've posted a message at ''']''' to get discussion started on what the awards programs should be and how they should be run. | |||
Your ideas and feedback would be greatly appreciated. | |||
''''']''''' 23:33, 18 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== what is vandalism? == | |||
was not ]. ] (]) 23:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
is. ] (]) 06:17, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
:] Please do not remove ] notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with ]. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-afd2 --> | |||
:] Please stop. If you continue removing ] notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with ], you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-afd3 --> | |||
::I have repleaced the ] tag which is ''not'' a speedy deletion tag, and commented at ]. Please leave the tag alone. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 10:40, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Your opinion would be appreciated== | |||
As a member of WikiProject Countries, I'm seeking your opinion on a possible issue identified at ]. If you have some spare moments, please contribute a comment at the ]. Best regards, '''<span style="font-variant:small-caps">]</span>''' 06:24, 20 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi,<br> | |||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692203726 --> | |||
== Possibly unfree File:Rocinha and Sao Conrado.jpg == | |||
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> ] (]) 19:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 17:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:09, 19 February 2023
Archives | |
|
AWB
Sorry but I have declined your AWB access request. See edit summary for explanation. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Neomis Animation
I've added some more information.. should be fine now. The artice was created by me as part of WP:AFC don´t really know much about it. Cheers! Acer (talk) 13:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
excessive speedies
Please see WP:STUB. The articles you are placing speedies on are most of them acceptable starts for articles. See WP:CSD for the definition of no context. If it is clear what the article is about, it has context. It is furthermore recommended not to place speedies of articles within the first few minutes of creation when the user may be working on them. Please don't bite the newbiews--and please don;t make extra work for the admins. You could help me clean up things by placing apologies on the user pages where you placed the warnings. Some of the speedies were properly deletable, and i did delete those articles, but sometimes using a more appropriate reason DGG (talk) 14:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Your good intentions are recognized, but read WP:Deletion policy and WP:CSD carefully before you go back to it; then go do some PROD first, one or two at a time, and work up from there as you see how it goes. PROD is the safe thing to do when in doubt. I'll keep an eye out. DGG (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
AWB Again
Declined again. You must have more then 500 edits to article space to be considered. Please do not apply again until you have reached this milestone. Spartaz 10:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
My apologies
I would like to apologize for failing to notify you in regards to my entry at the Administrators noticeboard. It was a honest mistake in good faith - nothing personal. Please see my full explanation. --James Bond (talk) 04:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
CIA figures
Sure they are, check here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbw01f (talk • contribs) 12:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I know, but that CIA data, I suppose that those statistics are from the World Bank though... Let's see if someone else will raise the question about that. Cheers.
--Mhsb (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
AWB *again*
You have still not made the 500 mainspace edits that you need to be considered for this tool. Your current count is 294. See the number next to "mainspace" here. Black Kite 00:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Amritaps cheema.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Amritaps cheema.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? mattbr 13:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Rio
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Rio de Janeiro. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please take a close look at what you're reverting. you're removing valid citations, and fact tags which are permitted under WP:CITE. inclusion of such information is not vandalism nor major changes to the article Michellecrisp (talk) 23:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- you don't need consensus to add references or fact tags. Misplaced Pages is an open edit encyclopaedia. Michellecrisp (talk) 02:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
October 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rio de Janeiro. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Michellecrisp (talk) 02:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to James Webb Space Telescope, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Misplaced Pages:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -MBK004 03:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Project Roony
A tag has been placed on Project Roony requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bongomatic 13:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Project Roony
I have nominated Project Roony, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Project Roony. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bongomatic 14:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Please delete the article.--Mhsb (talk) 02:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Request for help
I thought it might be a good idea to run a contest or two through the Countries WikiProject to attract editors to improve country coverage on Misplaced Pages, especially the country outlines.
I noticed you are a member of the WikiProject, and was wondering if you could help.
I've posted a message at Countries WikiProject talk page to get discussion started on what the awards programs should be and how they should be run.
Your ideas and feedback would be greatly appreciated.
The Transhumanist 23:33, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
what is vandalism?
This edit was not vandalism. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
This is. WWGB (talk) 06:17, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with 2009 Sydney dust storm. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.
- Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with 2009 Sydney dust storm, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages.
- I have repleaced the WP:AFD tag which is not a speedy deletion tag, and commented at WP:AN. Please leave the tag alone. Pedro : Chat 10:40, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Your opinion would be appreciated
As a member of WikiProject Countries, I'm seeking your opinion on a possible issue identified at List of sovereign states. If you have some spare moments, please contribute a comment at the Discussion of criteria. Best regards, Nightw 06:24, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Rocinha and Sao Conrado.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rocinha and Sao Conrado.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Comparison of Asian national space programs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of Asian national space programs is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Asian national space programs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.