| Revision as of 14:28, 13 March 2008 editGni (talk | contribs)387 edits →3RR← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:02, 31 May 2008 edit undoGni (talk | contribs)387 edits ←Blanked the page | ||
| (46 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hi, I noticed some of your edits. | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out ] or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ←]] 04:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Article on Jimmy Carter's ''Palestine Peace not Apartheid'' == | |||
| You wrote: | |||
| <blockquote>I was hoping you might weigh in on a dispute between myself and NYScholar on the ''Palestine Peace not Apartheid'' discussion page. The dispute is summarized under discussion section 19, "Criticism vs. Carter's response." Up until now the discussion has been a back and forth between me and NYScholar, so it would probably help if a few other people weighed in. Your thoughts are appreciated. ] 16:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)</blockquote> | |||
| I'm not currently interested in wading into more controversial articles in areas where I am moderately knowledgable but not expert. I suggest that you post notes on the talk pages of any appropriate ]. At least one relevant project would be ], but I imagine that if you look through the list there will be others. - ] | ] 17:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Deleting sourced info and pushing the CAMERA POV == | |||
| Please don't delete reliably sourced balance with edit summaries such as ""This section isn't for comments about CAMERA." If CAMERA is making a claim, that section is the appropriate place for reliably sourced balance. | |||
| You also seem intent on inserting the CAMERA POV throughout this encyclopedia article, and others. While CAMERA may certainly wish to portray themselves a certain way, for tax purposes or for whatever reason, an encyclopedia describes an organization based on what reliable sources say. Eg, it is valid to describe CAMERA as pro-Israel, based upon overwhelming sources using that description, and it is valid to describe CAMERA as supporting a boycott--in both these instances, you seem intent on inserting repeatedly CAMERA's own, somewhat self serving formulations, rather than what is in reliable sources. Please try and familiarize yourself with ] and other guidelines regarding these issues. ] (]) 20:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Articles should be a)fair and accurate, and b)well written. Moreover, wikipedia articles should be bound by one standard. The changes that you have been pushing move the article farther and farther from these goals. | |||
| :Unfortunately, there are little to no serious responses to these and other points I've raised and elaborated on in the discussion section to that article. ] (]) 20:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh, and on the Dvorkin thing -- aside from the fact that ad hominem comment doesn't relate to the specific charge, and so doesn't really belong in the article as a response to that specific charge -- it seems you're misrepresenting what Dvorkin said. It's not quite true, as you claimed, that Dvorkin "described the pressure from CAMERA and other organizations as 'a form of journalistic McCarthyism.' His comment was more qualified: "In my opinion, the pressure on NPR from these groups ''can constitute'' a form of journalistic McCarthyism." | |||
| :::OK, you are out of control with your single purpose POV pushing, hijacking of the article, and complete ignoring of Misplaced Pages guidelines. This has been posted elsewhere for help. ] (]) 21:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. ] (]) 21:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Your reversions have been posted to ]. Misplaced Pages's ] says "an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period". After breaking 3RR, it is best to '']'' your change back to the previous version. --] (]) 05:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:8 hours|a period of '''8 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) (]) 12:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> ] (]) (]) 12:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock|I'm arguing my points on the CAMERA discussion pages as much as, ''if not more than'', those who are constantly reverting my changes. Yet these editors are seemingly not blocked. There is a dispute being argued out on the here, and it seems unbelievable that only one party to the dispute is being blocked. After all, if there is a "revert war," does this not imply multiple actors? Moreover, my change attempt was to put the story back to its status quo language -- before a user unilaterally injected the POV pro-Israel language--until this is resolved by the parties; or since it doesn't seem like discussion was helping since everyone -- ''everyone'' -- was entrenched in their point of view, until its resolved by mediation. Please unblock me and allow me to participate in the process in the same way that those who disagree with me are participating. Thanks.}} | |||