| Revision as of 01:33, 14 March 2008 editStudent7 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers72,738 edits →Why did you remove the RFC at Teachings of Prem Rawat?: another ignored request← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:25, 4 January 2025 edit undoHarej (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,254 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Archives|1= | |||
| <!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Messedrocker/Archive07--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| ; 2004-2008: ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] | |||
| {{User:Messedrocker/Header}} | |||
| ; 2009-2014: ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] | |||
| ; 2015-2020: ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] | |||
| <big>'''''Welcome to my talk page!'''''</big> | |||
| ; 2021-present: ] ] ] ] ] | |||
| }} | |||
| * Please add all messages under its own header on the bottom. | |||
| For ''']''' matters specifically, please see ] for common issues or ] to leave a message. | |||
| * If you need an urgent response, ]. | |||
| __NOINDEX__ | |||
| ** You should also take a look at my MessedRocker On-The-Fly box on my ] | |||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | |||
| * If you leave a message here, I will respond on your user page. I expect you likewise to make your follow-up response (if applicable) on my page, and so forth. The exception is for trivial responses (like "ok" or "thank you") and if the messenger is not registered. | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} | |||
| <big><big><center>If the RFC bot is not listing your RFC, make sure it adheres to this format: | |||
| |counter = 40 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
| <code><nowiki>{{RFCxxx | section=Name of section !! reason=Summary of dispute !! time=~~~~~}}</nowiki></code> | |||
| |algo = old(14d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Harej/Archive/%(year)d | |||
| Note the section=<br/> Note the time=<br/> Note the exclamation points! | |||
| }} | |||
| </center></big></big> | |||
| Conversations are automatically archived the week after the latest comment on my talk page. | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ] | |||
| __FORCETOC__ | |||
| == RFCbot missed one? == | |||
| See: ]. Unless I messed up the syntax. Could you help out a bit? Thanks! --]|]|] 13:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC not showing == | |||
| I have tagged the ] page for RfC. But, it's not showing on the ] page. May be I didn't do it right. Could you check on what happened? <font face="Kristen ITC" color="deeppink">]</font><sup>(] • ])</sup> 12:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit on ] == | |||
| I assume this removal was an error due to the RfC block below it...if not, it certainly shouldn't be marked '''m'''inor. ] (]) 18:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == RFCpolicy list == | |||
| ] hasn't shown up at ] yet. Anything I did wrong? ] (]) 21:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC not transcluded == | |||
| See: ]. I could have got the code wrong, but I've checked it and it looks OK now. Could someone help me out please? <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] (] | ])</span> 22:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hi there== | |||
| Hi there, Messedrocker, I was looking for any past article RfCs on ]. Howe could I check to see if any have been done? I had a look in the ] archives, but couldn't find anything. ] (]) 22:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK, thanks anyway. ] (]) 23:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == RFC question == | |||
| I filed an RFC as seen and it still hasn't shown up on either list. Any help would be appreciated. ] 04:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==User:RFC bot== | |||
| BetacommandBot has been blocked by a dev for a week for abusing system resources ]. Since he'd taken over most of the RfC notifications, and RfC is an important part of the ] process, can you bring ] back online for a week to fill the gap? Thanks. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 04:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Featured sounds == | |||
| I noticed that you have participated ] in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. ]<sup> (]) (])</sup> 18:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Working Group login == | |||
| Hi Messedrocker, just letting you know I've sent an email (via the English Misplaced Pages email function) to you with details about your ] wiki login details. Be sure to change your password once you log in, for security reasons! If there's any problems with the login (passwords, username not working, or anything), ] and I'll try and sort them out for you. Cheers, ] (]) 04:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Much love. ] (]) (]) 04:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussion regarding Category:Wikipedians open to constructive criticism == | |||
| Hi Messedrocker. You may wish to see a discussion regarding ], a category that you are in, at ]. --] 23:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Much apathy. ] (]) (]) 02:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==User RfC bot== | |||
| Hi Messedrocker (love the name!) Mangojuice directed me to your page after I inquired about a delay in the updating of listings of RfCs by the bot. The page in question is ]. I'm pretty sure its listed properly. Can you do anything about the delay? Thanks a bunch. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't know if you had a hand in fixing it, but thought I would say thanks anyway, just in case. :) ]<sup>]</sup> 16:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank You == | |||
| Thank you for fixing my RFC ], it's very nice of you to take the time. I admit, I was having a bit of a time getting it to work correctly. Thanks again--] (]) 04:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Wow the bot went off into a parallel universe huh? well thanks again!--] (]) 01:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy Birthday == | |||
| {{Happy Birthday 2}} | |||
| *'''FROM YOUR FRIEND''': | |||
| --<span style="font-family:Times New Roman">] </span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman">]</span> <span style="font-family:Times New Roman">]</span> 00:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Happy Birthday 9}} | |||
| --<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva">] </span> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva">] </span><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 00:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Happy birthday, Messedrocker. · ] <sup>]</sup> 00:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for comment on main page deletion incident== | |||
| As you made an edit to the incident listed in the Administrators notice board, it is requested that you confirm the details of the incident ] | |||
| This is as the incident is used as the basis of an argument and needs to be confirm by persons familar with the event | |||
| Regards --] ] 2008-02-22 <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==New mailing list== | |||
| There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the ] (list: ]). Please consider joining it! ''']''' '''<small>]</small>''' 21:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==RfC== | |||
| Me and several other editors have been drafting an RfC on JzG ]. We listed an effort by you to influence his behavior in the past but don't necessarily expect you to be one of the certifiers for the RfC. But, if you'd to look it over and tell us if you think anything that we listed is unfair or inaccurate before we post it, that would be very helpful. Thank you. ] (]) 01:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == History RfC list update? == | |||
| Hi -- is the RFCBot still updating ]? The page hasn't been updated since the 20th, & there's been a few changes in items wanting to be listed. Thanks -- ] (]) 22:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks for the update, but is that page still part of its functions? I can see that the bot is performing edits, but -- to repeat myself -- ] hasn't been updated in 9 days, & the RFC template has been placed on ], but no link added (& removed from ] but that link not temoved). -- ] (]) 23:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == JzG RfC == | |||
| A user conduct RfC involving the actions of {{admin|JzG}} in which you have been mentioned is about to go live and will be found at ] shortly. ]] 11:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == bot help wanted == | |||
| Hello, I have just noticed a lot of bare URLs at the endnotes section in the ] article. Do you know how to run a bot to convert them (instead of doing it manually)? —] 17:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Speedy deletion of ] == | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. | |||
| If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt><noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude></tt>). | |||
| Thanks. --] (]) 02:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Speedy deletion of ] == | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. | |||
| If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt><noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude></tt>). | |||
| Thanks. --] (]) 03:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| that's the label I've given to our experimental skypecast scheduled for March 4th 1am UTC (god knows what time that is for you - sorry!) - check out the page, because I've put a few details there (and been cheeky enough to note you down as a participant). I hope it works out for you to join - and I've got my fingers crossed for the technology too.... | |||
| I'll be on IRC beforehand anyways to set it up etc. - and I look forward to it! | |||
| cheers, ] (]) 09:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==You are invited!== | |||
| {| class="infobox" style="width:250px" | |||
| |- | |||
| | ] | |||
| |''']''' | |||
| <br/>Next: ''']''' | |||
| <br/>Last: ] | |||
| <br/><span class="noprint plainlinksneverexpand" style="white-space:nowrap; font-size:xx-small">This box: ] <span style="font-size:80%;">•</span> ] <span style="font-size:80%;">•</span> </span> | |||
| |} | |||
| In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to ] activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Misplaced Pages and the other Wikimedia projects (see the ]). | |||
| Well also make preparations for our exciting ''''']''''' event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting). | |||
| In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes. | |||
| You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at ]. | |||
| You're also invited to subscribe to the public , which is a great way to receive timely updates.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery because you were on ]. ] (]) 03:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Thanks! == | |||
| Thanks for being part of the inaugural ] - it's all online now and I know some folk are giving it a listen.. I'm looking forward to further feedback, and thank you again for your involvement! ] (]) 06:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == RFC Error?! == | |||
| Hey, not sure what happened here but I'm pretty sure it wasn't whatever was supposed to happen. Figured you should know about that. ]]] 04:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Question about RFChist == | |||
| According to the for the {{tl|RFChist}} template, ] hasn't added anything to it since 09:45, 20 February 2008 UTC. | |||
| ] was posted about an hour ago () but has not been added to the list. Any idea when it might be added? — ] ] 23:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Why did you remove the RFC at ]?== | |||
| Why did you remove the RFC at ]?~Yes, it is old but nobody replied so it is still pending and hence should not be removed. ] (]) 20:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :RFC's tend to run for 30 days. ] 20:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Shall I file a new RFC or go to the arbcom? ] (]) 21:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Just put the RFC back up, and put a new date up. ] (]) (]) 21:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Yet another ignored request for third party== | |||
| It's been three weeks or more. The bot deleted the RFC for ]. This may be a good thing. By now, we've forgotton why we were arguing in the first place and the conflicting editors have wandered off. The article looks like the devil, but what the heck? Putting it back up seems useless if there is no one around who is willing to furnish a third party. How about a waiver to go into mediation? ] (]) 01:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:25, 4 January 2025
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
For InternetArchiveBot matters specifically, please see meta:InternetArchiveBot/Problem for common issues or meta:User talk:InternetArchiveBot to leave a message.