| Revision as of 23:19, 21 March 2008 editRobJ1981 (talk | contribs)32,546 edits List of characters in Bully← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:10, 16 April 2023 edit undoMcJeff (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,482 editsm Reverted 1 edit by RD Baerynolds (talk) to last revision by MalnadachBotTags: Twinkle Undo | ||
| (394 intermediate revisions by 88 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Help request== | |||
| <!--Template:Archivebox begins--> | |||
| {{tlp|Admin help}} I have identified what I believe is another ECW500 sockpuppet, but there are two concerns I have that prevent me from filing another checkuser. One, is that a checkuser was run recently and did not pick it up. The second, which ties to the first, is that if I were to post my evidence on wiki, he would be able to alter his behavior to avoid detection. There's one particular smoking gun that I absolutely do not want to state publicly. Would it be possible for a checkuser with time on his hands or an administrator familiar with ECW500 - or preferably, someone who's both - give me a way to contact him off wiki? Failing that, could someone instruct me on how I would go about presenting private evidence related to sockmasters to the appropriate authority? <span style="font-family:copperplate gothic bold;">]]</span> ] 23:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="infobox" style="width: 315px"> | |||
| :I think your best bet is to contact an active CU directly via email or to send a message to the ]. —] (]) 02:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="text-align: center">]<br /> | |||
| ] | |||
| </div> | |||
| ---- | |||
| # ] | |||
| </div><!--Template:Archivebox ends--> | |||
| == Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote == | |||
| ==List of characters in Bully== | |||
| Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at ]. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at ]. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, ] | |||
| You and Dan need to settle down and stop nitpicking many edits to the article. The section called: new people stopping by to edit (February 2008) was uncivil. In that section, you stated "I'm going to make it policy to delete all the tags put up by driveby editors", which is also uncivil. As I stated in that section: people can place tags and not discuss things, it's not a crime. Stop being overprotective over the article, just because tags are placed and the editor doesn't discuss. Discuss the tag on talk, then if it's not needed: remove AFTER discussion, not beforehand. Then there is the whole villain/nemesis nonsense. One word shouldn't be such a big deal. Just because a source uses that word, doesn't mean the article must have it listed the same way. Further article controlling will force me to make a discussion at an admin notice board about this. You and Dan watch the page/obsess with it a bit too much, and it certainly needs to stop. ] (]) 23:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:TParis@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/User:TParis/SecurePoll/List --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692009577 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, McJeff. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=866998231 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 03:10, 16 April 2023
Help request
{{Admin help}} I have identified what I believe is another ECW500 sockpuppet, but there are two concerns I have that prevent me from filing another checkuser. One, is that a checkuser was run recently and did not pick it up. The second, which ties to the first, is that if I were to post my evidence on wiki, he would be able to alter his behavior to avoid detection. There's one particular smoking gun that I absolutely do not want to state publicly. Would it be possible for a checkuser with time on his hands or an administrator familiar with ECW500 - or preferably, someone who's both - give me a way to contact him off wiki? Failing that, could someone instruct me on how I would go about presenting private evidence related to sockmasters to the appropriate authority? McJEFF 23:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- I think your best bet is to contact an active CU directly via email or to send a message to the mailing list. —DoRD (talk) 02:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote
Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, McJeff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)