Rhumart: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:39, 30 March 2008 editArthur Rubin (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 editsm moved User:CyclePat/Rhumart to Electro-magnetic therapeutic system: Revert. You're not the sole content author, so you may not userfy without permission.← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 10:36, 6 January 2015 edit undoInvadibot (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users119,128 editsm Bot: Fixing double redirect to Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc
(40 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			#REDIRECT ]
	<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
	{{AfDM\|page=Electro-magnetic therapeutic system\|date=2008 March 26\|substed=yes}}
	<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull\|page=Electro-magnetic therapeutic system\|date=26 March 2008\|result='''keep'''}} -->
	<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
	]
	__NOTOC__
	'''Electro-magnetic therapeutic system''' is the English title of Canadian Patent 1,113,156 which was issued in 1981.<ref>The Government of Canada (GoC). ''''. Department: ]. Agency: ] (CIPO), Accessed 26-03-2008.
	:('''Note''': The "''Bibliographic and Text Data Fields''" explains that (54) is "English/French Titles", which means, "The name of the invention as provided by the applicant, or as translated by CIPO.")
	:('''Annotation:''' This is a help guide that explains The Canadian Patents Database. It explains accessibility, the Completeness of Date Fields, Patents, Patent Document Images, Language Considerations, International agreed Number for the Identification of (bibliographic) Data code (INID code), Patent Classifications, Text Data Fields, Administrative Status Definitions, Maintenance Fees Definitions, Payment History, Viewing Patent Document Images, Site Availability & Downloading Capabilities.)</ref> The inventors Dr. ] and ], both from Canada, claimed that the device was an "electro-magnetic device for treating various types of ] and ] diseases."<ref name="CIPO"/>

	==History==

	On the 24<sup>th</sup> of November 1981 Dr. Drolet and Mr. Charland received patent approval for their electro-magnetic therapeutic system.<ref name="CIPO">The Government of Canada (GoC). . Department: ]. Agency: ] (CIPO), Accessed 26-03-2008.</ref> Their drawings, as portrayed within the Canadian patent, labeled the device "Ri - 2000 MAGNETOTHERAPY SYSTEM".<ref>The Government of Canada (Gov). . Figure 3, p.2 of 8. Accessed 26-03-2008</ref> By 1983, Dr. Drolet and Mr. Charland where issued another patent titled "''ELECTRO-MAGNETIC THERAPEUTIC SYSTEM AND METHOD''" which described the "''Ri - 2000''" in much further details and labeled the device as "''Ri -2000 RHUMART<sup>tm</sup>-THERAPY SYSTEM''".<ref>The Government of Canada (Gov). . Figure 7, p.7 of 16. Accessed 26-03-2008</ref> This second patent maintained many similar characteristics to the 1981 patent. In fact both patents drew and labeled their devices with "''RODROL INSTRUMENTATION INC.''".<ref>'''Note''': This is a comparative analysis of the aforementioned Canadian patents. It only makes descriptive claims about the information found in the primary source, the accuracy and applicability of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge. Per ], Misplaced Pages's Policy on Original Research, it is permissible for inclusion.</ref> ''Free World Trust'' was the rightfull owners of the patents of invention numbered 1,113,156 (the “'156 patent”) and 1,150,361 (the “'361 patent”) issued in 1981 and 1983 respectively.<ref name="SCC">'''' No. 26406,. Supreme Court of Canada. Decision rendered 15 Dec. 2000. Accessed 29-03-2008</ref>

	On December 15<sup>th</sup> 2000, in the case of '']'', a decission was rendered by the ] on the infringement of patents 156 and 361.<ref name="SCC"/> The decission would create a legal ] cited within hundred of Canadian trials.<ref>''.'' Canadian Legal Information Institute. (Lexum and Federations of Law Societies of Canada). Searched for term "Free world trust". Accessed 29-03-2008.</ref> The case was even noted in Canada for setting out "the test for ]" and "the ] claim construction".<ref>''''. Google 2008. Searched for term "Free World Trust". pp.1-2. Accessed 29-03-2008.</ref><ref>Sotiriadis, Bob et all. ''''." Centre CDP Capital et LEGER ROBIC RICHARD, p.8. Accessed 30-03-2008.</ref>

	==See also==
	<!--Note: This section proceeds in a logical sequence going from broad to specific. ex.: Magnetic fields, to induction, to eddy current.-->
	{{portalpar\|Electronics\|Nuvola_apps_ksim.png}}
	'''General'''
	*]
	*]
	*]
	*]
	'''Electromagnetic'''
	*]
	*]
	'''Electroconvulsive'''
	*]
	*]

	==External Links==
	'''Patents'''
	*
	*

	==Notes==
	{{reflist}}

	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]

Latest revision as of 10:36, 6 January 2015

Redirect to:

Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc