Misplaced Pages

Itek: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:39, 1 April 2008 editLouScheffer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,926 edits History: Added wiki links to quote← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:37, 28 November 2024 edit undoOnel5969 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers937,816 editsm Disambiguating links to Top Secret (disambiguation) (link changed to Classified information#Top_Secret_(TS)) using DisamAssist
(108 intermediate revisions by 68 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American defense spy camera manufacturer}}
'''Itek''' was a high technology company, specializing in special purpose optical systems, primarily cameras optimized for high altitude operation. It was founded in 1957, and acquired by ] in 1982. Litton was in turn acquired by the ] in 2001.
{{Infobox company
| name = Itek Corporation
| logo = Logo of Itek Corporation.svg
| type = Defunct
| genre =
| foundation = United States, 1957
| founder = ]
| defunct = 1996
| location =
| key_people = ], Founder<br />]<br />], Venture capitalist
| industry = ], ]
| num_employees =
| revenue =
| homepage =
}}
]
'''Itek Corporation''' was a United States ] that initially specialized in camera systems for ]s and various other ] systems.<ref>. // ''Aviation Week & Space Technology'', March 11, 1963, v. 78, no. 10, p. 7.</ref> In the early 1960s they built a ] in a fashion similar to ] or ], during which time they developed the first ] system and explored ] technology. These efforts were unsuccessful, and the company shed divisions to various companies, returning to its roots in the reconnaissance market. The remaining portions were eventually purchased by Litton in 1983, and then Hughes, Raytheon, and Goodrich Corporation.


==History== ==History==
{{USGovernment |sourceURL=, by David S. Robarge, ''Central Intelligence Agency''}}


===Beginnings===
The following history of Itek comes from a review of the book ''Spy capitalism: Itek and the CIA''<ref name=ICIA>{{cite book |title=Spy capitalism: Itek and the CIA |author=Jonathan E. Lewis |Publisher= Yale University Press |year=2002 |isbn=0-300-09192-3}}</ref> on the CIA web site above. The web site explicitly states that this text is in the public domain.
Richard Leghorn was a former ] (USAF) aerial reconnaissance expert who had first proposed flying reconnaissance missions over enemy territory in peacetime.<ref name=lewis>Lewis, 2002</ref> Leghorn left the Air Force to become head of ]'s European division,<ref name=focus>Time, 1963</ref> and started writing about the "]" proposal, which he strongly supported.
<blockquote>
Itek was founded in 1957 with seed money from ], that famous family’s most adventurous venture capitalist. The company’s name was a phonetic contraction of “information technology,” the sector of the economy that prescient analysts and investors foresaw as America’s future. Itek benefited enormously from their optimism. In just three months, its payroll burgeoned from a handful of executives to over a hundred scientists, engineers, and technicians. After only a year, its revenues and profits soared into the millions. It went public after less than two years in operation, and within 18 months of the initial offering, the price of a share of its stock shot up from $2 to over $200. “Itek was one of the great glamour stocks on Wall Street,” Lewis writes. “At its peak, Itek’s fame rivaled the notoriety, and the price-to-earnings ratio, of the top Internet stocks of ] of the late 1990s.”<ref>Lewis, pg 5</ref>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Throughout this meteoric rise, readers of Itek’s annual reports could not have known— because the company could not tell them—that its survival depended on a single customer, ]. By 1963, Itek’s classified operations produced 57 percent of the firm’s sales and accounted for 75 percent of its pre-tax income. What Itek shareholders and potential investors could not know was that if ] failed or another spy satellite program promised superior results, Itek probably would collapse. What they did know was that by the early 1960s the company was in sorry financial shape, suffering from a succession of well-meaning but ill-considered boardroom blunders by its president, Richard Leghorn. Trying to free Itek from dependence on secret government funds, Leghorn left it more beholden to the CIA than ever. But, Lewis notes, Itek and the CIA were “like partners trapped in a failed marriage. Although they may have been bitter and resentful toward each other, they were stuck in the relationship— CORONA made sure of that.” <ref>Lewis, p. 258</ref>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
The CORONA program proved its worth, but Itek’s long-term health remained uncertain. Leghorn (with, it should be added, the consent of his compliant board of directors) allocated barely a quarter of Itek’s R&D funds to the division that worked on secret reconnaissance. Instead, he poured money into developing commercial products that were marketed through shaky companies that he acquired. By early 1962, Leghorn clearly had failed at the difficult task of balancing Itek’s lucrative “black” projects with overt corporate acquisitions and commercial sales that provided cover but usually lost money.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Investors knew that something secret was going on behind Itek’s walls, but they had to take on faith the pronouncements that all was well within. Over time, that secrecy became double-edged. At first, it attracted investors, who figured that if the company could not say exactly what it was doing, the work had to be so important that it was sure to make money. “f the business was growing fast, classified, and backed by a Rockefeller, it was a smart investment,” Lewis writes. But when Itek faced a succession of technical, financial, and managerial problems in the early 1960s, that same mystique enabled Leghorn and the directors to hide poor decisions and bad news, and shielded them from the unpleasant questions of shareholders and the public:
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Leghorn could charm the financial press and the markets with his talk of an information revolution when Itek’s revenues and profits were steadily rising . . . it was a strategy that failed to hold together under the competitive pressures of the marketplace. Leghorn’s dream about an information revolution was prophetic, but impossible to achieve with the technologies available in his time. The companies he cobbled together were a flammable mixture of patents, possibilities, and products still in development. The marketplace demanded products that could be sold, not dreams.<ref>Lewis, pp. 135, 269-270</ref>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
By this time, far more was at stake than the health of investors’ portfolios, or even several hundred jobs. Itek’s survival had become intertwined with the nation’s security. “Any further deterioration of the company,” Lewis writes, “. . . would probably destabilize it completely. Itek’s custom-made spy cameras would cease to roll off the assembly lines, and America’s eyes in space would go blind.” The author notes that “At a time when the war of words between President Kennedy and Soviet Premier Khrushchev was raising the stakes in the ], when the United States needed intelligence on Soviet military capabilities more than ever, this was an unacceptable outcome.”<ref>Lewis, p. 207</ref>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
New management, led by former ] commando Frank Lindsay, got Itek past this troubled phase, but the firm soon got caught in the middle of a battle royal between the CIA, the ], and elements of the Air Force over which agency would control satellite reconnaissance. In early 1965, Lindsay stunned CIA managers by suddenly announcing that Itek was withdrawing from its Agency contract. He claimed that the post-CORONA camera design that the CIA insisted on would not work, and that Itek would get blamed when it failed. Director of Central Intelligence John McCone and Deputy Director for Science and Technology “Bud” Wheelon suspected, however, that the Agency’s rivals at the NRO and the Air Force had offered Itek a lucrative deal if it stopped working with the CIA. With so much of Itek’s income deriving from Agency work, they believed, the company could not have backed out unless it had guarantees of other contracts. No definitive evidence to support that allegation has surfaced, and the fact that the pullout damaged Itek irreparably suggests that McCone, et. al., were wrong. Whatever the truth may be, Lewis relies too much on NRO and Itek information and does not include enough material from CIA sources to give a full account.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
After this episode, Itek kept building CORONA cameras until the program ended in 1972, but it never won an Agency contract for any follow-on systems. Ultimately, its technical judgment in 1964-1965 proved wrong—a rival firm, ], built the post-CORONA camera that the CIA wanted, and it worked superbly.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Itek enjoyed a brief resurgence in 1966-1967. It made some gadgets for the space program and its stock climbed back to $172 a share. But then it fell into a steady decline. Ironically, soon after the signing of the first ] in 1972, the company had to fire many of the scientists and engineers whose work had made monitoring the agreement possible. By the mid-1970s, Itek stock traded for just $7 a share. Litton Industries bought the firm at a bargain price in the early 1980s, ending its life as an independent company.
</blockquote>


Open Skies proposed to allow any signing nation to overfly any other, which Leghorn believed would lower international tensions by allowing countries to verify the actions of their adversaries. Eisenhower raised the issue at the 1955 Geneva summit meetings as a way to reduce mutual fears of a surprise attack.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090226112721/http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=2735 |date=2009-02-26 }}</ref> At the time, the United States would have had a huge advantage if Open Skies was adopted, as their numerous European and Asian airbases would allow them access to the Soviet heartland, while the lack of USSR bases in the Americas — this being prior to the ] — would have made the treaty an empty promise. Unsurprisingly, the Soviets opposed Open Skies, something Eisenhower later admitted he fully expected.
==Products==


While Leghorn's writings on the topic were being widely read, he was secretly informed that the United States had already taken him up on his initial proposal, and the United States Air Force (and ]) were in the process of flying reconnaissance flights over the USSR.<ref name=lewis/> Aware that this would generate vast amounts of photography over long periods of time, Leghorn realized that a major problem would be storing the resulting imagery and allowing it to be easily retrieved for study. Kodak was in the process of introducing its "Minicard" ] product, and Leghorn felt this was a natural solution for the problem.<ref>Tyler et al.</ref> Leghorn sought improvement by combining it with machinery dedicated to the task of indexing the information required for reconnaissance. Leghorn contacted his long-time friend Theodore "Teddy" Walkowicz about forming a new company to build such a machine for the Air Force. Walkowicz was an associate of ]ist ], and eventually secured a seed loan for $600,000 in exchange for a directorship. Leghorn became president of the new company, whose ITEK name was a phonetic short form of "information technology".<ref name=focus/> Since Leghorn formerly worked at Kodak, there is speculation that the company name was an acronym for "I Took Eastman Kodak".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Synopsys Mentor Cadence TSMC GlobalFoundries SNPS MENT CDNS|url=http://www.deepchip.com/items/0431-07.html|access-date=2021-01-08|website=www.deepchip.com}}</ref>
Itek built many of the high technology optical products during the Cold War.

:*The cameras in the first US spy satellites, for the ] program<ref>{{cite web |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1995_May_23/ai_16896135 |title=Litton's Itek division revealed as supplier of space cameras for first U.S. spy satellites |publisher=Business Wire }}</ref>.
===Corona===
:*Several of the ] carried in the ] spy plane.
{{Main|CORONA (satellite)}}
:*The panaramic camera carried on the ] moon missions<ref>{{cite web |url=http://history.nasa.gov/afj/simbaycam/itek-pan-camera.htm |title=The ITEK Panoramic Camera |publisher=NASA }}</ref>.
Weeks after the company formed in late 1957, Leghorn took it in an entirely different direction by purchasing the Boston University Physical Research Laboratory (BUPRL), which researched reconnaissance cameras. BUPRL was designing the HYAC-1 camera for the USAF's reconnaissance balloon efforts, cameras that would eventually fly on the WS-461L balloons during 1957.<ref>Robert Craig Johnson, {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080405194629/http://worldatwar.net/chandelle/v4/v4n1-2/balloons.html |date=2008-04-05 }}, 1999</ref> Now at Itek, the company won contracts for similar cameras for aircraft like the ] and ].
:*The panaramic cameras on the Mars ] landers<ref>{{cite web |url=http://history.nasa.gov/SP-425/ch8.htm |title=SP-425 The Martian Landscape - Cameras Without Pictures |publisher=NASA}}</ref>.

:*The cameras aboard NASA's ER-2 (]) research aircraft<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/research/AirSci/ER-2/history.html |title=ER-2 Program History |publisher=NASA}}.</ref>
The CIA quickly informed them of their ] ] to produce the first spy satellites, and asked them to bid on the camera systems. Itek returned a design that used a rotating mirror to record panoramic swaths of the ground. Film was delivered from a canister and wrapped around a cylindrical window that allowed the maximum length of film to be used in a single exposure, increasing resolution. The rotation of the mirror was timed to properly account for the movement of the satellite to avoid stretching the images on-film. The result was a single long photograph showing a "strip" of land. At the time, the CIA had already contracted ] to supply cameras, but Itek's submission was technically superior and won them the contract in March or April 1958.<ref>Richelson, pg. 24</ref> To soften the blow, the CIA had Fairchild build the devices until Itek could start its own manufacturing capabilities.
:*A ] for the ].

:*Cameras for the KH-9 (]) satellites.
Leghorn was upset by the terms of the agreement, and at one point in 1959 issued a "stop work" order on the project to change its terms.<ref>Richelson, pg. 25</ref> The CIA quickly acquiesced, although they were spooked by the event. Had Itek lost the Corona contract, it was highly likely that the company would have collapsed. This possibility so worried the CIA that they arranged a personal meeting between Rockefeller and the CIA's chief of technical development, ], to inform Rockefeller of the Corona project and make him aware that national security rested on the company's well-being. Leghorn, he felt, needed direct supervision.
:*Cameras for balloon-borne reconnaisance programs such as ] and WS-461L<ref>{{cite web |url=http://worldatwar.net/chandelle/v4/v4n1-2/balloons.html |title=Genetrix, WS-461L, and Chaika: Cold War Balloons and Balloon Fighters}}</ref>. Spy satellites made these programs obsolete.

Shortly after winning Corona, Itek also won the contract for the Air Force's satellite program, ]. SAMOS originally envisioned a semi-real-time system that downloaded imagery via an onboard scanner, but later expanded to envision a number of different imaging systems based on a single airframe. One of these, E-5, was a project to provide low-resolution wide-area imagery for mapping purposes, which the Air Force needed to plan ingress routes for bombers during war. The SAMOS project was eventually abandoned, leaving several of the E-5 cameras in storage at a ] facility.<ref name=r57>Richelson, pg. 57</ref>

===Diversification efforts===
After winning the CORONA contract, Itek quickly grew from the executive staff to a company employing over a hundred scientists, engineers, and technicians. After only a year its revenues were in the millions, and the company started the process of raising an ]. In public the company stated that while their work was classified, they were working in the field of "information management" (some writers have commented that this may be the first use of the term).<ref name=lewis/> The real reasons for this growth - the BURPL purchase - remained secret, so on paper it appeared that Itek's information systems were generating huge orders that demanded a large staff. Writers speculated that the military might allow the company to release their work to the public, making the company highly valuable. Over the space of a few months, the value of the stock grew from $2 to $255, triggering a 5-for-1 split.<ref name=focus/>

Using the newly inflated value of their stock, Leghorn started an aggressive diversification effort. In 1960 Leghorn agreed to fund development of a computerized drafting system, ], based on the ] that had earlier been experimented on at ].<ref name=edm>Kosowsky, 2006</ref> The same year he arranged a merger with Hermes Electronics (originally Hycon Eastern), makers of various military communications systems. This was followed by the 1961 purchase of Photostat Corp., maker of offset printing systems using Kodak patents.<ref name=focus/> In 1962 he lured Gilbert King away from ], where he had worked on the ] and had developed the world's only working ].<ref>John Hutchins (ed), {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090219063654/http://www.hutchinsweb.me.uk/King-2000.pdf |date=2009-02-19 }}, ''Early Years in Machine Translation'', John Benjamins, 2000, {{ISBN|90-272-4586-X}} (RADC-TDR-62-105)</ref> Meanwhile, work continued on the original archiving system, but the company proved unable to deliver a working product.

Meanwhile, none of Itek's purchases turned into commercial successes, and in 1961 Itek reported a $2,500,000 loss. Its stock began to drop, hitting a low of $9.50.<ref name=focus/> In spite of the CIA's warnings, Rockefeller did little to address Leghorn's problems, which grew out of control. Frustrated by Leghorn ignoring the reconnaissance side of the company in favor of the continuing string of information projects, the engineers revolted and demanded that he be removed. Walkowicz brought in ], a former CIA operative, to help Leghorn get the company back on track.<ref name=focus/> This effort backfired, as Leghorn was insulted by the effort and refused to cooperate. In May 1962 Leghorn was pushed out in favor of Lindsay, who became Itek's president and CEO.

With Lindsay at the helm, Itek returned to focusing mostly on reconnaissance efforts, although by this point their photocopying machines were starting to become successful as well.<ref name=focus/> As a side-effect of this newfound focus, Lindsay shed a number of Leghorn's acquisitions. The first to go was the EDM project in 1962, which ironically became a profitable division of ] as their ] system.<ref name=edm/>

By 1964 Lindsay had returned the company to profitability. By this time the CORONA program had overcome its initial failures and had become a success. Itek would eventually deliver about 200 panoramic cameras for the CORONA program. A further success involved the E-5 cameras originally built for the SAMOS project. In 1961 CORONA delivered low-resolution imagery of a new installation that became known as the "Tallinn line". A debate broke out over their significance; some suggested that it was an ] installation using the ] missile, while others pointed out that the resolution was too low to say anything of the sort. A rush effort started at Lockheed to adapt the E-5 camera to the existing CORONA airframe, resulting in the LANYARD project, today known as the ]. The project was, generally, a failure. Three satellites were launched, one returning no film and one only blank frames.<ref name=r57/>

===Formation of the NRO===
Both the CIA and Air Force continued development of new satellite systems, which led to concerns about the proper use of these valuable and expensive resources. These concerns eventually led to the formation of the ] (NRO) in 1961, with the overall mission of ensuring that satellite data was distributed properly, and that the satellite time was not wasted, either by photographing the same area twice, or by allowing an area of interest to be photographed by the first available means. Although the Air Force was able to work within the new environment without any apparent problems, creation of the NRO led to serious political infighting with the CIA.<ref>Richelson, pg. 122</ref>

In 1963 Albert "Bud" Wheelon took over from Bissell as the CIA's chief of technology development. Unlike Bissell, who worked almost entirely with outside contractors, Wheelon started internalizing the process and built up a much larger department.<ref name=lewis/> In October 1963 he suggested forming the "Satellite Photography Working Group" to study their current efforts and suggest improvements. Under the new agreements, the NRO was supposed to supply funding for the effort, and on 18 November they agreed. In a following experiment the team attempted to determine the optimal resolution for satellite photography, degrading a series of high-quality photographs in stages to see how much information could be pulled from them at different levels of detail. The results strongly suggested building a new satellite with a 2-foot resolution, something what would not be able to be done by improving the existing CORONA system, which offered 10–25 foot resolution. The NRO declined to offer funding for the satellite, however, so Wheelon arranged funding from its own budget and started the "FULCRUM" effort.<ref>Richelson, pg. 125</ref>

When news of the FULCRUM efforts later found their way to the NRO, a major fight broke out that eventually landed on the desk of ]. NRO was supposed to be in charge of coordinating development, and was at that point funding development of the Air Force's 18-inch resolution design, ] "GAMBIT". Stung by the outcome, the project suffered a further setback when Itek announced that they would no longer work on FULCRUM's camera because of a demand that they felt was unreasonable,<ref name="Richelson, pg. 127">Richelson, pg. 127</ref> although other sources suggested it was the final result of a long stream of demands and design changes coming from the newly enlarged CIA division. Wheelon retaliated by handing the contract to ], which delivered the cameras for what would become the successful ] "HEXAGON", better known as "Big Bird".<ref name=lewis/>

There are two different versions of the story of what followed. Richelson states that the NRO quickly handed Itek a contract for their own "S-2" system, a follow-on to the Air Force's troubled SAMOS program. This project had originally selected a Kodak camera, and changed to an Itek design after their FULCRUM announcement.<ref name="Richelson, pg. 127"/> He notes the suggestion that the offer was pre-arranged, in order to deprive the CIA of their camera, and thereby doom the FULCRUM effort. Lewis states that both the FULCRUM and S-2 projects had ''already'' been handed to Itek, and it was the internal power struggles between the CIA and NRO that led to Wheelon's stream of demands as punishment for accepting the S2 work.<ref name=lewis/> Whatever the story, Itek was no longer the CIA's primary supplier after CORONA and LANYARD ended, allowing Perkin-Elmer to become a major supplier. S-2 was later downgraded.

===Through the 1970s===
Into this void came a number of different projects. One of these was the ] "Optical Bar Camera" that flew on both the ] and ], as well as a further development of the mapping camera from SAMOS/LANYARD that was used on some of the Big Birds. Itek also found a customer for their panoramic cameras with ], who used them both on ] for mapping the lunar surface,<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090119092652/https://history.nasa.gov/afj/simbaycam/itek-pan-camera.htm |date=2009-01-19 }}, NASA</ref> as well as ]'s Mars landers.<ref>, NASA</ref> Later they built portions of the ] and similar projects.

During the same period, Itek's Graphic Systems division, originally supplying the printing systems, had greatly diversified.

===Litton purchase===
In 1982 ] was attempting to diversify their military holdings, and engaged ] to arrange the purchase of a company specializing in ]. Lehman found a number of companies that Litton might be interested in, including Itek, presenting a report on 20 September 1982. In October, Litton started purchasing Itek stock in the market in an effort to gain control of about 4.9% of the common shares before making a friendly takeover offer.<ref name=court>967 F.2d 742</ref>

On 23 November the chairmen of the two companies met, and by January 1983 the negotiations had progressed to the point of making a formal offer. At the advice of Lehman Brothers, Litton made an offer of the current market price plus a 50% premium. During this period the value of Itek stock was rising, so Litton had to increase their offer on several occasions. On 12 January 1983, Litton made an offer of $48, which succeeded on 4 March 1983.<ref name=court/> Itek became Litton's Itek Division, although the Itek Graphic Systems division was sold off in 1985.<ref>, ''The New York Times'', 14 February 1985</ref>

In 1986 it was revealed that a Lehman Brothers trader had been purchasing Itek stock during the negotiations, part of a wider ] scandal. Ira Sokolow, part of the Lehman team arranging the Itek purchase, had leaked information about the deal to another Lehman employee, Dennis Levine. They agreed to make ] to drive up the stock price and then split the profits. Levine and other traders at Lehman (either tipped off or simply following Levine's trades) started collecting Itek stock and were thus rewarded with part of the 50% premium when the deal closed.<ref>Ronald Sullivan, , ''The New York Times'', 19 June 1992</ref> Litton later sued Lehman, claiming that their purchase would have been at a lower price had the insider trading not occurred. The stock price rose from $26 to $33 during this period, meaning that had the price stayed at $26 a fair offer would have been $39. A lengthy series of court cases followed.<ref name=court/>

===Hughes, Raytheon, and Goodrich purchase===
Litton downsized dramatically in the 1990s, selling off many of its components. In 1996 ] purchased what was then left of Itek, Itek Optical Systems.<ref>{{Cite web|title=StackPath|url=https://www.laserfocusworld.com/display_article/28552/12/none/none/News/Hughes-acquires-Itek-Optical-Systems-from-Litton-Industries|access-date=2021-01-08|website=www.laserfocusworld.com}}</ref> At the time they announced that Itek's own facilities in ] would fold into their own Hughes Danbury Optical Systems in ]. Later in the 1990s, after Raytheon's purchase of Hughes, Itek became Raytheon Optical Systems Company. In early 2000, Raytheon divested the Optical Systems group and it was purchased by Goodrich Corporation. Goodrich Corporation was subsequently purchased by United Technologies Corporation headquartered in East Hartford, Connecticut.{{Citation needed|date=January 2021}}

== See also ==
* Itek ], 16-bit computer used on ].


==References== ==References==
{{reflist}}


==Bibliography==
*{{cite journal |author=F. D. Smith |title=History of optics at Itek |journal=Appl. Opt. |volume=11 |pages=2729 |year=1972}}
{{refbegin}}
* Jonathan Lewis, "Spy Capitalism: Itek and the CIA", Yale University Press, 2002, {{ISBN|0-300-09192-3}}
* Jeffrey Richelson, "The Wizards of Langley: Inside the CIA's Directorate of Science and Technology", Westview Press, 2002, {{ISBN|0-8133-4059-4}}
* , 967 F.2d 742
* , ''Time'' 8 November 1963
* , ''Business Wire'', 23 May 1995
* David Weisberg, , ''The Engineering Design Revolution'', 2006
* David Kosowsky, , ''RLE currents'', MIT, Fall 1996 pg. 10
{{refend}}


==Further reading==
<references/>
{{refbegin}}
* A.W. Tyler, W.C. Myers and J.W. Kuipers, "The Application of the Kodak Minicard System to Problems of Documentation", ''American Documentation'', 6:1, (January 1955), pp.&nbsp;18–30
==See also==
* James Marquardt, "Transparency and Security Competition: Open Skies and America's Cold War Statecraft, 1948-1960",
* Johnathan E. Lewis. "Spy Capitalism: Itek and the CIA New Haven", CT: Yale University Press. 329 pages.
* ''Journal of Cold War Studies'', Volume 9 Number 1 (Winter 2007), pp.&nbsp;55–87
{{refend}}


]
:*]
]
:*]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 11:37, 28 November 2024

American defense spy camera manufacturer
Itek Corporation
Company typeDefunct
Industry Graphic Arts Equipment, Optics
FoundedUnited States, 1957
FounderRichard Leghorn
Defunct1996
Key peopleRichard Leghorn, Founder
Tadeusz Walkowicz
Laurance Rockefeller, Venture capitalist
ITEK Corporation, Lexington, Massachusetts

Itek Corporation was a United States defense contractor that initially specialized in camera systems for spy satellites and various other reconnaissance systems. In the early 1960s they built a conglomerate in a fashion similar to LTV or Litton, during which time they developed the first CAD system and explored optical disc technology. These efforts were unsuccessful, and the company shed divisions to various companies, returning to its roots in the reconnaissance market. The remaining portions were eventually purchased by Litton in 1983, and then Hughes, Raytheon, and Goodrich Corporation.

History

Beginnings

Richard Leghorn was a former United States Air Force (USAF) aerial reconnaissance expert who had first proposed flying reconnaissance missions over enemy territory in peacetime. Leghorn left the Air Force to become head of Eastman Kodak's European division, and started writing about the "Open Skies" proposal, which he strongly supported.

Open Skies proposed to allow any signing nation to overfly any other, which Leghorn believed would lower international tensions by allowing countries to verify the actions of their adversaries. Eisenhower raised the issue at the 1955 Geneva summit meetings as a way to reduce mutual fears of a surprise attack. At the time, the United States would have had a huge advantage if Open Skies was adopted, as their numerous European and Asian airbases would allow them access to the Soviet heartland, while the lack of USSR bases in the Americas — this being prior to the Cuban Revolution — would have made the treaty an empty promise. Unsurprisingly, the Soviets opposed Open Skies, something Eisenhower later admitted he fully expected.

While Leghorn's writings on the topic were being widely read, he was secretly informed that the United States had already taken him up on his initial proposal, and the United States Air Force (and Royal Air Force) were in the process of flying reconnaissance flights over the USSR. Aware that this would generate vast amounts of photography over long periods of time, Leghorn realized that a major problem would be storing the resulting imagery and allowing it to be easily retrieved for study. Kodak was in the process of introducing its "Minicard" aperture card product, and Leghorn felt this was a natural solution for the problem. Leghorn sought improvement by combining it with machinery dedicated to the task of indexing the information required for reconnaissance. Leghorn contacted his long-time friend Theodore "Teddy" Walkowicz about forming a new company to build such a machine for the Air Force. Walkowicz was an associate of venture capitalist Laurance Rockefeller, and eventually secured a seed loan for $600,000 in exchange for a directorship. Leghorn became president of the new company, whose ITEK name was a phonetic short form of "information technology". Since Leghorn formerly worked at Kodak, there is speculation that the company name was an acronym for "I Took Eastman Kodak".

Corona

Main article: CORONA (satellite)

Weeks after the company formed in late 1957, Leghorn took it in an entirely different direction by purchasing the Boston University Physical Research Laboratory (BUPRL), which researched reconnaissance cameras. BUPRL was designing the HYAC-1 camera for the USAF's reconnaissance balloon efforts, cameras that would eventually fly on the WS-461L balloons during 1957. Now at Itek, the company won contracts for similar cameras for aircraft like the U-2 and SR-71.

The CIA quickly informed them of their top secret Corona to produce the first spy satellites, and asked them to bid on the camera systems. Itek returned a design that used a rotating mirror to record panoramic swaths of the ground. Film was delivered from a canister and wrapped around a cylindrical window that allowed the maximum length of film to be used in a single exposure, increasing resolution. The rotation of the mirror was timed to properly account for the movement of the satellite to avoid stretching the images on-film. The result was a single long photograph showing a "strip" of land. At the time, the CIA had already contracted Fairchild Camera and Instrument to supply cameras, but Itek's submission was technically superior and won them the contract in March or April 1958. To soften the blow, the CIA had Fairchild build the devices until Itek could start its own manufacturing capabilities.

Leghorn was upset by the terms of the agreement, and at one point in 1959 issued a "stop work" order on the project to change its terms. The CIA quickly acquiesced, although they were spooked by the event. Had Itek lost the Corona contract, it was highly likely that the company would have collapsed. This possibility so worried the CIA that they arranged a personal meeting between Rockefeller and the CIA's chief of technical development, Richard Bissell, to inform Rockefeller of the Corona project and make him aware that national security rested on the company's well-being. Leghorn, he felt, needed direct supervision.

Shortly after winning Corona, Itek also won the contract for the Air Force's satellite program, SAMOS. SAMOS originally envisioned a semi-real-time system that downloaded imagery via an onboard scanner, but later expanded to envision a number of different imaging systems based on a single airframe. One of these, E-5, was a project to provide low-resolution wide-area imagery for mapping purposes, which the Air Force needed to plan ingress routes for bombers during war. The SAMOS project was eventually abandoned, leaving several of the E-5 cameras in storage at a Lockheed facility.

Diversification efforts

After winning the CORONA contract, Itek quickly grew from the executive staff to a company employing over a hundred scientists, engineers, and technicians. After only a year its revenues were in the millions, and the company started the process of raising an initial public offering. In public the company stated that while their work was classified, they were working in the field of "information management" (some writers have commented that this may be the first use of the term). The real reasons for this growth - the BURPL purchase - remained secret, so on paper it appeared that Itek's information systems were generating huge orders that demanded a large staff. Writers speculated that the military might allow the company to release their work to the public, making the company highly valuable. Over the space of a few months, the value of the stock grew from $2 to $255, triggering a 5-for-1 split.

Using the newly inflated value of their stock, Leghorn started an aggressive diversification effort. In 1960 Leghorn agreed to fund development of a computerized drafting system, EDM, based on the PDP-1 that had earlier been experimented on at MIT. The same year he arranged a merger with Hermes Electronics (originally Hycon Eastern), makers of various military communications systems. This was followed by the 1961 purchase of Photostat Corp., maker of offset printing systems using Kodak patents. In 1962 he lured Gilbert King away from IBM, where he had worked on the Automatic Language Translator and had developed the world's only working optical disc. Meanwhile, work continued on the original archiving system, but the company proved unable to deliver a working product.

Meanwhile, none of Itek's purchases turned into commercial successes, and in 1961 Itek reported a $2,500,000 loss. Its stock began to drop, hitting a low of $9.50. In spite of the CIA's warnings, Rockefeller did little to address Leghorn's problems, which grew out of control. Frustrated by Leghorn ignoring the reconnaissance side of the company in favor of the continuing string of information projects, the engineers revolted and demanded that he be removed. Walkowicz brought in Franklin Lindsay, a former CIA operative, to help Leghorn get the company back on track. This effort backfired, as Leghorn was insulted by the effort and refused to cooperate. In May 1962 Leghorn was pushed out in favor of Lindsay, who became Itek's president and CEO.

With Lindsay at the helm, Itek returned to focusing mostly on reconnaissance efforts, although by this point their photocopying machines were starting to become successful as well. As a side-effect of this newfound focus, Lindsay shed a number of Leghorn's acquisitions. The first to go was the EDM project in 1962, which ironically became a profitable division of Control Data as their Digigraphics system.

By 1964 Lindsay had returned the company to profitability. By this time the CORONA program had overcome its initial failures and had become a success. Itek would eventually deliver about 200 panoramic cameras for the CORONA program. A further success involved the E-5 cameras originally built for the SAMOS project. In 1961 CORONA delivered low-resolution imagery of a new installation that became known as the "Tallinn line". A debate broke out over their significance; some suggested that it was an antiballistic missile installation using the SA-5 Gammon missile, while others pointed out that the resolution was too low to say anything of the sort. A rush effort started at Lockheed to adapt the E-5 camera to the existing CORONA airframe, resulting in the LANYARD project, today known as the KH-6. The project was, generally, a failure. Three satellites were launched, one returning no film and one only blank frames.

Formation of the NRO

Both the CIA and Air Force continued development of new satellite systems, which led to concerns about the proper use of these valuable and expensive resources. These concerns eventually led to the formation of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) in 1961, with the overall mission of ensuring that satellite data was distributed properly, and that the satellite time was not wasted, either by photographing the same area twice, or by allowing an area of interest to be photographed by the first available means. Although the Air Force was able to work within the new environment without any apparent problems, creation of the NRO led to serious political infighting with the CIA.

In 1963 Albert "Bud" Wheelon took over from Bissell as the CIA's chief of technology development. Unlike Bissell, who worked almost entirely with outside contractors, Wheelon started internalizing the process and built up a much larger department. In October 1963 he suggested forming the "Satellite Photography Working Group" to study their current efforts and suggest improvements. Under the new agreements, the NRO was supposed to supply funding for the effort, and on 18 November they agreed. In a following experiment the team attempted to determine the optimal resolution for satellite photography, degrading a series of high-quality photographs in stages to see how much information could be pulled from them at different levels of detail. The results strongly suggested building a new satellite with a 2-foot resolution, something what would not be able to be done by improving the existing CORONA system, which offered 10–25 foot resolution. The NRO declined to offer funding for the satellite, however, so Wheelon arranged funding from its own budget and started the "FULCRUM" effort.

When news of the FULCRUM efforts later found their way to the NRO, a major fight broke out that eventually landed on the desk of Robert McNamara. NRO was supposed to be in charge of coordinating development, and was at that point funding development of the Air Force's 18-inch resolution design, KH-7 "GAMBIT". Stung by the outcome, the project suffered a further setback when Itek announced that they would no longer work on FULCRUM's camera because of a demand that they felt was unreasonable, although other sources suggested it was the final result of a long stream of demands and design changes coming from the newly enlarged CIA division. Wheelon retaliated by handing the contract to Perkin-Elmer, which delivered the cameras for what would become the successful KH-9 "HEXAGON", better known as "Big Bird".

There are two different versions of the story of what followed. Richelson states that the NRO quickly handed Itek a contract for their own "S-2" system, a follow-on to the Air Force's troubled SAMOS program. This project had originally selected a Kodak camera, and changed to an Itek design after their FULCRUM announcement. He notes the suggestion that the offer was pre-arranged, in order to deprive the CIA of their camera, and thereby doom the FULCRUM effort. Lewis states that both the FULCRUM and S-2 projects had already been handed to Itek, and it was the internal power struggles between the CIA and NRO that led to Wheelon's stream of demands as punishment for accepting the S2 work. Whatever the story, Itek was no longer the CIA's primary supplier after CORONA and LANYARD ended, allowing Perkin-Elmer to become a major supplier. S-2 was later downgraded.

Through the 1970s

Into this void came a number of different projects. One of these was the KA-80 "Optical Bar Camera" that flew on both the U-2 and SR-71, as well as a further development of the mapping camera from SAMOS/LANYARD that was used on some of the Big Birds. Itek also found a customer for their panoramic cameras with NASA, who used them both on Project Apollo for mapping the lunar surface, as well as Project Viking's Mars landers. Later they built portions of the Keck Telescope and similar projects.

During the same period, Itek's Graphic Systems division, originally supplying the printing systems, had greatly diversified.

Litton purchase

In 1982 Litton Industries was attempting to diversify their military holdings, and engaged Lehman Brothers to arrange the purchase of a company specializing in electronic warfare. Lehman found a number of companies that Litton might be interested in, including Itek, presenting a report on 20 September 1982. In October, Litton started purchasing Itek stock in the market in an effort to gain control of about 4.9% of the common shares before making a friendly takeover offer.

On 23 November the chairmen of the two companies met, and by January 1983 the negotiations had progressed to the point of making a formal offer. At the advice of Lehman Brothers, Litton made an offer of the current market price plus a 50% premium. During this period the value of Itek stock was rising, so Litton had to increase their offer on several occasions. On 12 January 1983, Litton made an offer of $48, which succeeded on 4 March 1983. Itek became Litton's Itek Division, although the Itek Graphic Systems division was sold off in 1985.

In 1986 it was revealed that a Lehman Brothers trader had been purchasing Itek stock during the negotiations, part of a wider insider trading scandal. Ira Sokolow, part of the Lehman team arranging the Itek purchase, had leaked information about the deal to another Lehman employee, Dennis Levine. They agreed to make insider trades to drive up the stock price and then split the profits. Levine and other traders at Lehman (either tipped off or simply following Levine's trades) started collecting Itek stock and were thus rewarded with part of the 50% premium when the deal closed. Litton later sued Lehman, claiming that their purchase would have been at a lower price had the insider trading not occurred. The stock price rose from $26 to $33 during this period, meaning that had the price stayed at $26 a fair offer would have been $39. A lengthy series of court cases followed.

Hughes, Raytheon, and Goodrich purchase

Litton downsized dramatically in the 1990s, selling off many of its components. In 1996 Hughes Electronics purchased what was then left of Itek, Itek Optical Systems. At the time they announced that Itek's own facilities in Lexington, Massachusetts would fold into their own Hughes Danbury Optical Systems in Danbury, CT. Later in the 1990s, after Raytheon's purchase of Hughes, Itek became Raytheon Optical Systems Company. In early 2000, Raytheon divested the Optical Systems group and it was purchased by Goodrich Corporation. Goodrich Corporation was subsequently purchased by United Technologies Corporation headquartered in East Hartford, Connecticut.

See also

References

  1. Elements of reconnaissance. // Aviation Week & Space Technology, March 11, 1963, v. 78, no. 10, p. 7.
  2. ^ Lewis, 2002
  3. ^ Time, 1963
  4. "This Day in History 1955: Eisenhower presents his 'Open Skies' plan" Archived 2009-02-26 at the Wayback Machine
  5. Tyler et al.
  6. "Synopsys Mentor Cadence TSMC GlobalFoundries SNPS MENT CDNS". www.deepchip.com. Retrieved 2021-01-08.
  7. Robert Craig Johnson, "Genetrix, WS-461L, and Chaika: Cold War Balloons and Balloon Fighters" Archived 2008-04-05 at the Wayback Machine, 1999
  8. Richelson, pg. 24
  9. Richelson, pg. 25
  10. ^ Richelson, pg. 57
  11. ^ Kosowsky, 2006
  12. John Hutchins (ed), "Gilbert W. King and the IBM-USAF Translator" Archived 2009-02-19 at the Wayback Machine, Early Years in Machine Translation, John Benjamins, 2000, ISBN 90-272-4586-X (RADC-TDR-62-105)
  13. Richelson, pg. 122
  14. Richelson, pg. 125
  15. ^ Richelson, pg. 127
  16. "The ITEK Panoramic Camera" Archived 2009-01-19 at the Wayback Machine, NASA
  17. "SP-425 The Martian Landscape - Cameras Without Pictures", NASA
  18. ^ 967 F.2d 742
  19. "Litton Set to Sell Itek Graphic Unit", The New York Times, 14 February 1985
  20. Ronald Sullivan, "Litton Wins Court Round In Itek Case", The New York Times, 19 June 1992
  21. "StackPath". www.laserfocusworld.com. Retrieved 2021-01-08.

Bibliography

Further reading

  • A.W. Tyler, W.C. Myers and J.W. Kuipers, "The Application of the Kodak Minicard System to Problems of Documentation", American Documentation, 6:1, (January 1955), pp. 18–30
  • James Marquardt, "Transparency and Security Competition: Open Skies and America's Cold War Statecraft, 1948-1960",
  • Johnathan E. Lewis. "Spy Capitalism: Itek and the CIA New Haven", CT: Yale University Press. 329 pages.
  • Journal of Cold War Studies, Volume 9 Number 1 (Winter 2007), pp. 55–87
Categories: