| Revision as of 18:59, 7 August 2005 editSoltak (talk | contribs)2,206 edits Why Are You A Liar?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:12, 12 October 2009 edit undoDeirdreAnne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,821 editsm Redirect sock's talk to user | ||
| (38 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| P.S. Feel free to leave a message on ] if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :) | |||
| ==Your Accusations== | |||
| <small>In responce to the comments on my talk page:</small> | |||
| My message made no legal threat. I am sorry that you misinterpreted it. Warning someone that they might be breaking the law is not a threat. I never said that either Misplaced Pages or I would take any legal action against you; I only warned you for your benefit that many localities don't like behavior similar yours and it would be best to change your ways. Furthermore, you have clearly and willfully violated just about every bit of Misplaced Pages policy that there is to violate including personal attacks against me, so no administrator would take you seriously if you accused me (or anyone else) of a policy violation. -]⇝] 06:25, 19 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Do not list another user's page for deletion == | |||
| If you persist in marking ]'s page for deletion, you will be banned. Do not modify or remove this warning - I will monitor your behaviour and will remove it myself when I see fit. ] 05:32, July 22, 2005 (UTC) (Administrator). | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Thanks for your words of encouragement - and for your work here! --] ] 19:48, July 23, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] Warning == | |||
| Please do not delist any pages from the WP:RFA page. I understand there is a dispute between you and other editors on that page, but that doesn't give you the right to remove a valid RFA out of spite. ] | ] | ] 18:09, August 6, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| No, it means you're too new and have demonstrated you do not have a solid grasp on Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. And, "my boy", I happen to have said authority you doubt I have. And, seeing you just relisted the RFA... again... I am going to extend said authority by blocking you for 30 minutes. Take this time to read ] and ] before you make a serious blunder. ] | ] | ] 18:19, August 6, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Following the rules== | |||
| I suspect you know the rules already, so I'll just give you one last warning. You should not use the speedy delete template to request verification of facts. You could simply have googled ]'s name yourself. | |||
| http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/BortMa00.htm | |||
| If you will comply with policy, however, you are welcome to keep editing here. ] 19:00, August 6, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Diplomacy== | |||
| You really need to be more diplomatic. On the Fatherland talkpage, you refer to the article's original author (i.e: me) as a "troll". I've been reading your comments on other talk pages, and based on those, I do not believe you have the right to criticise my work on here. It is not only impolite and arrogant to brazenly insult people older and wiser than yourself, but it is also a very risky path to take if you wish to become an Administrator. I agree entirely with Linuxbeak's above comments, and seeing as he is an Administrator with the power to block you, I would seriously advise you to think carefully about what you write in future. ] 16:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Why Are You A Liar? == | |||
| Sorry for being so forward but, really, why are you a liar? When you tried to get yourself elected an administrator, you lied about being a NYU graduate with a law degree, as well as lying about being married. More recently, on my friend ] talk page, you made references to dating the daughter of a Cambridge professor "some time ago", something I find rather unlikely. If your user page is correct, you're a 15 year old Peruvian. So, which is a lie? Your age or all that other garbage? -] 18:59, 7 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:12, 12 October 2009
Redirect to: