| Revision as of 04:54, 22 April 2008 editMARussellPESE (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,241 editsm →Give me a break← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:12, 26 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | <span style="color:Blue; font-family:Maiandra GD; font-size:large;">I archive "discussion oriented" comments, along with all other resolved issues.</span> | ||
| <font color="Maroon" face="Maiandra GD" size="5">Please post comments about on-going discussions, edits, and/or content to the article's discussion page. I don't believe they can be of any benefit to anyone being closed off to this page.</font> | |||
| ⚫ | < |
||
| *] -January 2006 | *] -January 2006 | ||
| *] -April 2008 | *] -April 2008 | ||
| ==Give me a break== | |||
| You delete two fair warnings for personal attacks that include specific statements, reply on my talk page with a bogus "Warning" that's a repetition of material on your own, and then tell me ''I'm not'' to remove material from my talk page, when the ] say I can? Can you see the hypocrisy? I see the ]. | |||
| What you read as sarcasm is criticism of your arguments, or lack thereof. Proof by assertion is a fallacy, but unfortunately a method you favor. You can't call that what it is without calling it what it is. What you don't consider personal attacks are your statements and accusations about me or other editors. Can you see the hypocrisy? | |||
| If your arguments were more sound, and if you could keep your comments about your interlocutors to yourself, you'd be much more effective. ] (]) 04:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:12, 26 February 2023
I archive "discussion oriented" comments, along with all other resolved issues.