| Revision as of 19:47, 5 May 2008 edit88.198.15.112 (talk) if you won't unblock me, thats ok, but please place a link to this on the admin noticeboard so that others can review.β Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:48, 13 May 2008 edit undoMZMcBride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users190,641 edits rm expired protection tagΒ | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="messagebox" style="text-align: center; padding-left:1em; padding-right:1em;">''This ] resolved to'' '''static.88-198-15-112.clients.your-server.de''' ''as of 5 June 2007, 16:02 (UTC)''</div><!-- Template:hostname --> | <div class="messagebox" style="text-align: center; padding-left:1em; padding-right:1em;">''This ] resolved to'' '''static.88-198-15-112.clients.your-server.de''' ''as of 5 June 2007, 16:02 (UTC)''</div><!-- Template:hostname --> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I made a meatpuppet complaint, against several admins, with diffs, my complaint should be considered, or at the very least, deleted by someone other than an individual I complained against, btw the vandalism is not mine, this is a shared IP.. I can't make an account as that is blocked too.|decline=You were blocked for obvious trolling; I see no reason to unblock. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=I made a meatpuppet complaint, against several admins, with diffs, my complaint should be considered, or at the very least, deleted by someone other than an individual I complained against, btw the vandalism is not mine, this is a shared IP.. I can't make an account as that is blocked too.|decline=You were blocked for obvious trolling; I see no reason to unblock. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I'd like to know why making a valid complaint against a number of people doing the bidding of one individual (against wikipedia ploicy), is considered trolling, my complaint contained valid evidence and diffs, of admins performing actions way outside the mandate of adminship, if they were not admins and did this they would be warned or blocked|decline=People agreeing is not in contravention of policy. Please stop abusing the {{tl|unblock}} template or this page will be protected. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=I'd like to know why making a valid complaint against a number of people doing the bidding of one individual (against wikipedia ploicy), is considered trolling, my complaint contained valid evidence and diffs, of admins performing actions way outside the mandate of adminship, if they were not admins and did this they would be warned or blocked|decline=People agreeing is not in contravention of policy. Please stop abusing the {{tl|unblock}} template or this page will be protected. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
| {{unblock|My complaint, and the diffs have obviously not been read, you will see specific reference to avoiding 3RR orchestrated between users, also I have checked ] and can't see where making one complaint (of any kind) is a valid reason for a block, the complaint should be answered, as is required of all who are complained about where evidence is presented. I'm not abusing the block template, I am compelled to post in this way as the admin who blocked me was one of those I complained about.}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=My complaint, and the diffs have obviously not been read, you will see specific reference to avoiding 3RR orchestrated between users, also I have checked ] and can't see where making one complaint (of any kind) is a valid reason for a block, the complaint should be answered, as is required of all who are complained about where evidence is presented. I'm not abusing the block template, I am compelled to post in this way as the admin who blocked me was one of those I complained about.|decline=You vandalised two articles and created a highly spurious accusation of sockpuppetry. I have protected this page until the expiry of the block due to abuse of {{tl|unblock}}. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:48, 13 May 2008
This IP address resolved to static.88-198-15-112.clients.your-server.de as of 5 June 2007, 16:02 (UTC)Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, the π! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Misplaced Pages, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users, and you will be able to:
- Monitor changes to pages of interest with your own watchlist;
- Create new pages;
- Choose your own username, provided it is appropriate;
- Customize the appearance and behavior of the website;
- Edit semi-protected pages;
- Upload images; and
- Rename pages.
Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, remember to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~). --Geniac 16:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Catwoman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. βΞ±αΌ°ΟΞ―Ξ±Ο β’discussionβ’ 21:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
88.198.15.112 (block log β’ active blocks β’ global blocks β’ contribs β’ deleted contribs β’ filter log β’ creation log β’ change block settings β’ unblock β’ checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Blocked by admin after I made a legitimate complaint against them. Admin has rv;ed my complaint too
Decline reason:
I couldn't find any legitimate complaints that you made in your edit history, only some fairly ridiculous ones, and a bunch of vandalism. β FisherQueen (talk Β· contribs) 17:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
88.198.15.112 (block log β’ active blocks β’ global blocks β’ contribs β’ deleted contribs β’ filter log β’ creation log β’ change block settings β’ unblock β’ checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made a meatpuppet complaint, against several admins, with diffs, my complaint should be considered, or at the very least, deleted by someone other than an individual I complained against, btw the vandalism is not mine, this is a shared IP.. I can't make an account as that is blocked too.
Decline reason:
You were blocked for obvious trolling; I see no reason to unblock. Sam Korn 18:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
88.198.15.112 (block log β’ active blocks β’ global blocks β’ contribs β’ deleted contribs β’ filter log β’ creation log β’ change block settings β’ unblock β’ checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'd like to know why making a valid complaint against a number of people doing the bidding of one individual (against wikipedia ploicy), is considered trolling, my complaint contained valid evidence and diffs, of admins performing actions way outside the mandate of adminship, if they were not admins and did this they would be warned or blocked
Decline reason:
People agreeing is not in contravention of policy. Please stop abusing the {{unblock}} template or this page will be protected. Sam Korn 18:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
88.198.15.112 (block log β’ active blocks β’ global blocks β’ contribs β’ deleted contribs β’ filter log β’ creation log β’ change block settings β’ unblock β’ checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My complaint, and the diffs have obviously not been read, you will see specific reference to avoiding 3RR orchestrated between users, also I have checked Blocking_policy and can't see where making one complaint (of any kind) is a valid reason for a block, the complaint should be answered, as is required of all who are complained about where evidence is presented. I'm not abusing the block template, I am compelled to post in this way as the admin who blocked me was one of those I complained about.
Decline reason:
You vandalised two articles and created a highly spurious accusation of sockpuppetry. I have protected this page until the expiry of the block due to abuse of {{unblock}}. Sam Korn 21:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.