Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pandora Peaks: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:47, 18 August 2005 editZoe (talk | contribs)35,376 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:51, 23 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,781,313 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}}, {{WikiProject Pornography}}, {{WikiProject Women}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(28 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi|closer=]|date=16 August 2005}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=Stub|listas=Peaks, Pandora|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=low|needs-photo = yes}}
{{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Pornography|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
}}
{{Backwardscopyvio|title=Pandora Peaks: The Original Big Boob Superstar|url=http://www.pandorapeaks.com/|year=2008 or 2009|id=222531481}}
{{Image requested|sex workers}}

== Something which may interest editors of this page == == Something which may interest editors of this page ==


Line 9: Line 19:
::::SHE IS NOT FULLY CLOTHED. She clearly has on an immodest bikini top that shows off her breasts in their practical entirety. With breasts that large she should cover up quite a bit so as not to titillate or offend, a good appropriate modest dress would be some heavy sweaters or jackets that covered her obscene figure. -] 23:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC) ::::SHE IS NOT FULLY CLOTHED. She clearly has on an immodest bikini top that shows off her breasts in their practical entirety. With breasts that large she should cover up quite a bit so as not to titillate or offend, a good appropriate modest dress would be some heavy sweaters or jackets that covered her obscene figure. -] 23:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
:::::This is the problem with your "project". You are attempting to push your view of obscene on the rest of Misplaced Pages which violates ] and ]. She could walk down the street in that getup totally legally and without any recourse from the authorities. If you find it offense, then tough, its your opinion and your opinion means squat.] 23:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC) :::::This is the problem with your "project". You are attempting to push your view of obscene on the rest of Misplaced Pages which violates ] and ]. She could walk down the street in that getup totally legally and without any recourse from the authorities. If you find it offense, then tough, its your opinion and your opinion means squat.] 23:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
::::::It has been mentioned that your debater is a sockpuppet yahoo attempting to stir up trouble and intentionally not represent what any of this is about. Even if he is real, he does not represent anyone's views but his own -- and I think it is a solitary view. --] 14:08, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
:::::It should be noted that the wonder twins ''are'' her most notable feature and the basis of her career (which additionally the picture well relates to). As such a more modest picture would be much less illustrative. Mind you, the opinion of a female wikipedian who wouldn't have to make this kind of weak excuses for her libido would be interesting to hear. --] 08:54, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
::::::I seriously doubt Pandora Peaks is a Wikipedian.] 14:08, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
:::::::Didn't say anything of the sort. Just poking fun at myself. --] 14:35, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

== next Pandora? ==

My only question is, if she's retired, who is going to take her place?
There has to be someone out there with the same fake ones, same size, similar other dimensions. Yes there are lots of adults stars, but who quite "stack up" in all areas of interest.

Look up Sabrina Sabrok. - JO 753 April 1 2007

== Statistical data ==

Well, based on this video at it seems that the Japanese have measured her scientifically. The video's in Japanese, but the results are displayed quite clearly. No nudity here. The 72HH given here is obviously wrong, as it would indicate a morbidly obese woman. --] 16:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
: The video you indicated has been removed since. --]|] 16:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:51, 23 February 2024

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 16 August 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
WikiProject iconGeorgia (U.S. state) Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state)
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconPornography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
Revisions succeeding this version of this article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Misplaced Pages rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
It is requested that an image or photograph of Pandora Peaks be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.		Upload

Something which may interest editors of this page

Any help which could be provided would be greatly appreciated. -Godfearing Parent.

  • I'm failing to see how this violates any sense of decency? It's an article about a notable porn star and there are no "obscene" or "pornographic" pictures on the article page. If no one responds in 5 days I'll delete this POV tag. Gateman1997 22:12, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
I'm not a fan of this so-called Decency project, but I do think it would be better to have a picture of Pandora Peaks that doesn't have her hand down her pants.--Prosfilaes 22:19, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Frankly I don't see how it matters. (I agree there might be better shots of her out there, but that's beside the point). This tag is used to identify obscene articles. This article is neither obscene nor offensive unless your a raging right winger with a "Jesus Saves" bumpersticker. (Please note that she is fully clothed in the pic.)Gateman1997 22:44, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
SHE IS NOT FULLY CLOTHED. She clearly has on an immodest bikini top that shows off her breasts in their practical entirety. With breasts that large she should cover up quite a bit so as not to titillate or offend, a good appropriate modest dress would be some heavy sweaters or jackets that covered her obscene figure. -DavidsCrusader 23:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
This is the problem with your "project". You are attempting to push your view of obscene on the rest of Misplaced Pages which violates WP:NOT and WP:NPOV. She could walk down the street in that getup totally legally and without any recourse from the authorities. If you find it offense, then tough, its your opinion and your opinion means squat.Gateman1997 23:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
It has been mentioned that your debater is a sockpuppet yahoo attempting to stir up trouble and intentionally not represent what any of this is about. Even if he is real, he does not represent anyone's views but his own -- and I think it is a solitary view. --Noitall 14:08, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
It should be noted that the wonder twins are her most notable feature and the basis of her career (which additionally the picture well relates to). As such a more modest picture would be much less illustrative. Mind you, the opinion of a female wikipedian who wouldn't have to make this kind of weak excuses for her libido would be interesting to hear. --Kizor 08:54, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
I seriously doubt Pandora Peaks is a Wikipedian.Gateman1997 14:08, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Didn't say anything of the sort. Just poking fun at myself. --Kizor 14:35, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

next Pandora?

My only question is, if she's retired, who is going to take her place? There has to be someone out there with the same fake ones, same size, similar other dimensions. Yes there are lots of adults stars, but who quite "stack up" in all areas of interest.

Look up Sabrina Sabrok. - JO 753 April 1 2007

Statistical data

Well, based on this video at YouTube it seems that the Japanese have measured her scientifically. The video's in Japanese, but the results are displayed quite clearly. No nudity here. The 72HH given here is obviously wrong, as it would indicate a morbidly obese woman. --Anshelm '77 16:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The video you indicated has been removed since. --Vlad|-> 16:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Categories: