Revision as of 21:29, 19 May 2008 editජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,473 edits →Parapsychology: r← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:59, 18 December 2024 edit undoMrSchimpf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,788 edits →Proposed deletion of Galleria (Lexington): new sectionTag: New topic | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retired|date=November 2023}} | |||
{{semi-retired|date=October 2009}} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%" | {| class="wikitable" style="width:100%" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#FAF9F1" style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; font-size:12px; border:1px solid #E0DBA9;" | | | bgcolor="#FAF9F1" style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; font-size:12px; border:1px solid #E0DBA9;" | | ||
* '''Archives:''' 2006 | ] | ] | 2007 | ] | ] | 2008 | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | 2009 | ] | ] | ] | 2010 | ] | 2012 | ] | 2013 | ] | 2014 | ] | 2015 | ] | 2016 | ] | 2017-23 | ] | |||
'''This is my talk page! Heres a few tips:''' | |||
|} | |||
* Pissed about your page being deleted? ] is where you want to be. | |||
* Rude or inflammatory messages will be removed without notice. | |||
* Feel free to leave any other comments, messages, critcisms or thanks below! | |||
== Custom signature fix needed == | |||
'''Archives:''' 2006 | ] | ] | 2007 | ] | ] | 2008 | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
|} | |||
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. ] have made your current custom signature invalid. | |||
{{quotation|"I think we really need to much more strongly insist on a pleasant work environment and ask people quite firmly not to engage in that kind of sniping and confrontational behavior. We also need to be very careful about the general mindset of "Yeah, he's a jerk but he does good work". The problem is when people act like that, they cause a lot of extra headache for a lot of people and drive away good people who don't feel like dealing with it. Those are the unseen consequences that we need to keep in mind. | |||
--] (]) 22:51 5 February 2008}} | |||
{{Signpost-subscription|right}} | |||
{{Semi-wikibreak}} | |||
'''The problem:''' Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags. | |||
==USRD Newsletter, Issue 4== | |||
<small>Apologies for the late delivery; my internet connection went down halfway through the delivery process.</small> | |||
'''The solutions:''' You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing. | |||
{| width="80%" align="center" style="border: 1px black solid; padding: 0em; border-collapse:collapse" | |||
|- valign="middle" style="background-color: green; color:white" | |||
<div style="margin-left:1.6em;"> | |||
|width="33%" style="padding:5px" align="left"|] | |||
'''Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:''' | |||
|width="33%" style="padding:5px" align="center"|] | |||
# ]. | |||
|width="33%" style="padding:5px" align="right"|] | |||
# Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "'''Treat the above as wiki markup.'''" | |||
|- valign="middle" style="background-color: green; color:white; text-align:center" | |||
# Remove anything in the {{int:yournick}} text box. | |||
|colspan=3 style="padding:5px"|<big>'''] Newsletter'''</div> | |||
# Click the blue "{{int:Saveprefs}}" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "{{int:Restoreprefs}}" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.) | |||
|- | |||
'''Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:''' | |||
|colspan=3 style="background-color: gold; text-align:center; font-weight:bold;border-bottom: 1px black solid"| Volume 2, Issue 4 • ] ] • ] | |||
# ]. | |||
# Click the {{mw button|Learn more|normal}} button next to the error to learn how to fix the error. | |||
# Update your signature to fix the error. | |||
# Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature. | |||
'''Solution 3: Do nothing:''' | |||
# In accordance with ], all invalid signatures will be changed to ], which looks like "] (])", one month from now.</div> If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at ]. Thank you! ] (]) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:HouseBlaster/invalid_signatures&oldid=1201518366 --> | |||
==WikiProject Louisville Newsletter== | |||
|- style="vertical-align: top;" | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid <nowiki>#</nowiki>1c15a5; background-color: <nowiki>#</nowiki>fdffe7; color: <nowiki>#</nowiki>1c15a5;" | |||
| | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;text-align:center;line-height: 100%;"| ]<br />''']''' | |||
;<big>Departments</big> | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
*] | |||
|style="font-size:x-large; padding:0; vertical-align:middle; height:1.1em; color:<nowiki>#</nowiki>1c15a5; border-bottom:1px solid <nowiki>#</nowiki>1c15a5;" | '''WikiProject Louisville Newsletter (April 2024)''' | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
| | |||
;<big>Features</big> | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
| | |||
;<big>State and national updates</big> | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
|- | |- | ||
|style="vertical-align:middle;" | Believe it or not, ] is still in operation after nearly 18 years, and we're in the ]. | |||
| colspan=3 style="background-color: gold; text-align:center; font-weight:bold; border-top:1px black dotted;" | ] • ] • ] • ]: ] | |||
|} | |||
:<small>Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – ] —] (]) 22:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
'''Recent Project Happenings''' | |||
==A Simple Plan== | |||
* Since fall of last year, the project has undergone a major revamp. All pages of the project have been redesigned and largely rewritten. Of special note to members is that we're now ''listed participants''. It's a slightly different mode of operation that WikiProjects have been gradually moving toward – instead of being like a club, we're an action center! Check out our ] for more details. | |||
{{resolved}} | |||
* We have over 6,800 articles included in the project and over 21,000 pages (including talk pages) overall. | |||
Why is the page being protected? The summary that was there was ALREADY approved by admin happy-melon after a lengthy battle. I can see NO reason whatsoever why the article is once again being completely trashed. Is it standard policy to throw out the results of a long dispute that was moderated by a fellow admin? ] (]) 16:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
'''Derby 150 Edit-a-thon, Anyone?''' | |||
== ] and ] == | |||
] | |||
About at least how much longer before those two image is finialize, becasue normally I see files get process no later than 12 days. Another 5 days at least. I understand when people cannot be on Wiki 24/7 becase it is not a true time job. Espcially some people is still undergraduates, and some people have tests and works.--'''] (])''' 19:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Your ''']''' on having an ] to commemorate the ]. It would take place during the ]. | |||
: I don't klnow, but any human-involved project is bound for delays. <small>] | ] | ]</small> 01:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
'''Did You Know''' | |||
==hey== | |||
* WikiProject Louisville now has ] you may hand out to any editor doing significant work in Louisville area-related articles? | |||
hi, i recently added a genre dispute section to the used page both Pwange8 and FatalError loved what i did with it and they both made some tweaks to improve it however there is a user SilverOrion that keeps deleteing half of the paragraph, im trying to aviod an edit war here so im bringing this to u since we delt with each other it the past, they are saying the bert said the band isnt scremo when the source we have listed says he doesnt want to be considered screamo, they are also removing that the band is still often considered scremo and about half of the paragraph that follows, out of the 3 or 4 users that have edited the paragraph so far they are the only one causing a problem that can lead to an edit war, the pararaph was created to avioid edit warring but when they keep removing so much info, its hard to kepp it that way, can you have talk to them and tell them not to change it to their liking because even the users that use to hate me agree with it the way that i made it. tahnx. ] (]) 06:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
* We now have a way to look up tagged issues in our articles ]? | |||
* We now have even more ways to ] within our project? | |||
'''Check Out Our Newest Articles'''<br /> | |||
::also with the amount of info they are removing, i think it may be consider vandalism, so i told them on their talk page that i bough tthe conflict up with anadmin so we can try to strighten things out. ] (]) 06:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
] · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] | |||
{{small|If you would like to opt out of receiving WikiProject Louisville newsletters, please add your name to the "Opt out of newsletters" list on {{nowrap|]}}.}} | |||
:nevermind, im working on it with another admin right now. ] (]) 07:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
] <sup>] • ]</sup> 06:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::SilverOrion is still being abit of a problem to me, anytime an edit is made that they dont like, they say its a sock puppet of mine when i only have this aoccunt. edits were made by pawnge8, nouse4aname, gb, and bill and since they didnt like them they said "looks like u got another sock puppet account" also if u look on their main page they say that they constantly edit bands genres and will get invloved in edit wars and not back down, other users such as nouse4aname, bill and pwange8 and also not liked some tings they did such as remvoing screamo from a lsit of used gernesc(as seen on the used talk page), we managed to work things out on how the paragraph shud be so thats fine but it really seems like this user is just on wiki to start up trouble (they admitted somewehre to not being a big used fan, yet they still war on the page of the band they dont care about) it doesnt make much sense other thne that they are a trouble maker. u can talk to pwange8 and nouse4aname because u delt with us 3 in the past and maybe they can give a little more support or proof of what im saying, overall any edit made that they dont agree with is what they say is a sock puppet of me (which is not and u no pwange8 and nouse4aname arent sockpuppets of me) so maybe u can give them a ban just to end this problem with their account. and if u look on their talk page they had disputes about 3 other bands genres and its prob gona be more to come. ] (]) 17:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Please == | |||
Could you please redact your comment on Mccready's talk page? There's no need to ]. Thanks for understanding. Cheers! ] (]) 07:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:...and by replying to his trolling attempts is also riling him up. It's amusing to read at the least. <small>] | ] | ]</small> 13:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Rfb participation thanks == | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
Hello, Seicer. | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After ], the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- ] (]) 18:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>'''] failed condo project; site is still an empty surface lot'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
==Omegatron== | |||
Seicer: From your post on ], I assume your feeling is that Omegatron either did nothing wrong or nothing worthy of correcting or reversing? Is that right? And if so, why? I was under the impression that involved administrators were supposed to avoid taking sides. ] (]) 02:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Nothing that has already been raised. There have been questionable actions from both sides, and as an uninvolved administrator, I simply closed it because escalating the matter will only further degrade the relations on both sides. Sometimes, it's better to forgive and forget rather than drag it through the mud. <small>] | ] | ]</small> 03:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:* Accepted. Very wise. ] (]) 04:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
==]== | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="font-family: Roboto;">''']''' <span style="color:#00008B">•</span> <small>''(])''</small></span> 23:55, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi there. I've brought this user to your attention ]. He is indefinitely blocked from editing on wikipedia but is still doing so through the use of a sock that cannot be indefinitely blocked because of a dynamically allocated IP address. You blocked the sock for a week but this block has since expired and the user has returned to direct more insults towards me, me "rude and mean," describing my views as "narrow minded" and telling me to "grow up." Granted, that is not as harsh as calling me a dick head as he did previously but still. All this on a talk page that he has not previously written anything on before the expiry of this latest block. He has not edited anything else since his return either. I'm just wondering whether there's anything that can be done about this borderline stalking. --] (]) 02:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
: I'll keep a watch but I don't see anything too incivil yet. <small>] | ] | ]</small> 01:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
== Thank you! == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
Thank you so much for . He's been a real annoyance among the Reference Desk and most of Misplaced Pages alike.--] (]) 13:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>'''] condo building'''</blockquote> | |||
:...aaaaaaand now he's unblocked :( --] (]) 13:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
==Hi== | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Just to say I'm sorry if you think I warrant any sanction. I have replied to your comments on ]. ]</font></b> ]</font></b> 02:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I still think DS needn't have been so intimidating. He doesn't know my life situation that makes privacy more vital to me. But I know he's liked here by some people, and anyway I shouldn't have been evil.:) ]</font></b> ]</font></b> 02:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="font-family: Roboto;">''']''' <span style="color:#00008B">•</span> <small>''(])''</small></span> 23:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== The Used == | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
We ], so I'm requesting the article to be un-protected. The only person that has not agreed with us is ], but I don't think it would be worth trying to convince him otherwise. The rest of us have reached a consensus, so if he attempts to change it again, we can consider it vandalism or whatever. Thank you! -- ''']'''] 18:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
==USRD participants list== | |||
<blockquote>'''Failed development project of only local note'''</blockquote> | |||
As discussed at ], the participants list at ] is being split by state. Due to any of the following factors- your extended participation in ] discussions, your IRC participation, or your extended participation in Shields or Maps, I have guessed that you are a nationwide editor and have designated you as such in the USRD partiicpants table. This is part of the lengthy process. '''If this is in error, please let me know immediately.''' This is especially likely with this group as I have to guess whether you are a national or a state editor. Regards, ''']''' (] ]) 21:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
==Parapsychology== | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Come on Seicer, there was a consensus on attribution, everything was fine till SA started edit warring against that consensus. Why do we have to put up with the page protected in his version? This is not a legit dispute. This is just disruption by one editor. ——''']'''</span> ] Ψ ]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 21:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
: I'm just protecting it to prevent edit warring, and you know that the protected version is not an endorsement of one version over another. I'm not taking sides, but as you are aware, I previously inserted in the removed text per consensus. If you can find the link and post it on the talk page (I'm heading out for a while), I'd be happy to reinsert it. <small>] | ] | ]</small> 21:14, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="font-family: Roboto;">''']''' <span style="color:#00008B">•</span> <small>''(])''</small></span> 23:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Remember ]. Any hanky-panky will be reported to ]. ] (]) 21:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:59, 18 December 2024
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages as of November 2023. SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages as of October 2009.Custom signature fix needed
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Misplaced Pages's software have made your current custom signature invalid.
The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.
Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
- Update your signature to fix the error.
- Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.
Solution 3: Do nothing:
- In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.
If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Misplaced Pages talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Louisville Newsletter
WikiProject Louisville |
WikiProject Louisville Newsletter (April 2024) | |
Believe it or not, WikiProject Louisville is still in operation after nearly 18 years, and we're in the Top 40 most active projects.
Recent Project Happenings
Derby 150 Edit-a-thon, Anyone? Your input is welcomed on having an edit-a-thon to commemorate the 150th Kentucky Derby. It would take place during the Kentucky Derby Festival. Did You Know
Check Out Our Newest Articles If you would like to opt out of receiving WikiProject Louisville newsletters, please add your name to the "Opt out of newsletters" list on this page. |
Stefen Towers among the rest! 06:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Gameday Center
The article Gameday Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:MILL failed condo project; site is still an empty surface lot
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nate • (chatter) 23:55, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Woodlands (Lexington)
The article Woodlands (Lexington) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:MILL condo building
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nate • (chatter) 23:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Galleria (Lexington)
The article Galleria (Lexington) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Failed development project of only local note
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nate • (chatter) 23:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)