| Revision as of 19:12, 8 June 2008 editKelly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,890 edits →Julian Baggini unprotection request← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:31, 29 January 2024 edit undoTheImaCow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers84,942 edits →Proposed deletion of File:Organic Apple.jpg: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=13 December 2021}} | |||
| <!-- IF YOU WANT TO LEAVE ME A MESSAGE GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE --> | |||
| <!-- IF YOU WANT TO LEAVE ME A MESSAGE, PLEASE GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE --> | |||
| <tr><td valign="top"> | <tr><td valign="top"> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 10 | ||
| |algo = old(14d) | |algo = old(14d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:TimVickers/archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:TimVickers/archive %(counter)d | ||
| Line 51: | Line 52: | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| |}<!--Template:Archivebox--> | |}<!--Template:Archivebox--> | ||
| Line 57: | Line 64: | ||
| </tr></table> | </tr></table> | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Peer review/PRbox}} | |||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == You have a message == | |||
| == Informing past contributors of new ] == | |||
| {{Talkback|Whpq}} | |||
| As you were a contributor in the ], I am letting you know that {{tl|Maintained}} is again up for deletion. Please review the current version of the template and discuss it at the ]. Thanks! — <small>]] • 2008-01-30 17:48Z</small> | |||
| {{talkback|immunize}} | |||
| Thank you for the invitation. I will try to follow the Enzyme Kinetics article and make contributions when I can. ] (]) 9:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| == Homo Sapiens interbreed with Homo Neanderthalensis == | |||
| It was a while ago, but I haven't forgotten. | |||
| I have provided some additional sources which the general reader can also understand. For us scientists, youtube may seem an unreliable source, but that is only the case if the source itself is unreliable, which is why I have collected videos from somewhat reputable sources such as the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and others. This is so the general public can also partake and understand some of the main concepts of human evolution whereas if I only used peer reviewed scientific journals, the only people reading them would be the small minority of scientists on planet Earth. But as source of reference I will nonetheless continue to include peer reviewed scientific sources so that the scientific community will began to understand that human evolution is not the way they want it to be, but far more complicated series of migrations, evolution due to the selective pressure of their respective geographical location and possible interbreedings resulting in the modern day Homo Sapiens who happen to be part Homo Neanderthalensis and the ] anatomically modern ] who may either be part Homo Neanderthalensis due to possible interbreeding or it is possible the ] in ] did not significantly interbreed with the ] and that the anatomically modern Chinese Homo Erectus alive today simply retain what seems to be "neanderthal" genes because the Neanderthals were direct descendants of ] which happens to be either a separate species or subspecies of ], and as such they both carry similar genes and passed them into their progeny in both respective evolutionary branches. Thank you! Please watch : | |||
| <Moved to trophy cabinet> :) | |||
| 1.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpQiBPdFtog&NR=1 | |||
| == ref:deletion Satish Babu == | |||
| 2.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9zVEQCIiRs&feature=related | |||
| Hi, The page Satish Babu was deleted on 13th of February.It was about the contributions of a journalist to the Regional Media. Can you let me know how it could find relevance and where i can find the deleted page? ](]) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Admiration == | |||
| {| style="width: 95%;" | |||
| I admire your image works ! | |||
| | colspan="2" valign="middle" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background-color: #B0C4DE;" | | |||
| {| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="background-color: #B0C4DE;" | |||
| | rowspan="2" style="width: 100px; text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;" | ] | |||
| == Thanks! == | |||
| | style="font-size: 200%; text-align: center; vertical-align: middle; letter-spacing: 0.15em;" | '''''The ] Newsletter''''' | |||
| |- | |||
| thank you very much!!! You´ve been very useful, keep in touch! blitox | |||
| | style="font-size: 120%; text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;" | Issue 2 (January 2010) | |||
| == RfA Thanks == | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="border-style: none; padding: 0px; "> | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="border-style: solid ; text-align: left; border: blue solid 1px; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background: blue; padding: 5x;"> | |||
| <div class="NavHead" style="border-style: solid; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background: blue ; text-align: center; border: blue solid 1px; padding: 10px; font-size: 150%;"><font face="helvetica" color="black">A message from ]].</font></div> | |||
| <div class="NavContent" style="background: none; display: none;"> | |||
| <center> | |||
| <table style="background: white ; text-align: left; font-size: 95%;"><tr><td> | |||
| <tr><td><table style="width: 100%; float: left; margin: 5px; border: black solid 3px; -moz-border-radius: 5px; background: white;"> | |||
| <tr><td><div style="padding: 3px; text-align: center; font-size: 150%;">]I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, was unsuccessful with '''61 support''', '''25 oppose''', and '''4 neutral'''. I've been taking the advice of the Opposes into practice and hopefully I can improve myself. Once again, thank you. ^_^</td></tr> | |||
| </div></tr></td></table> | |||
| </td> | |||
| </td></tr></table> | |||
| </center> | |||
| </div></div></div> | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| <span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">] ] | ] ]</span> | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 3px solid #FF4F00; background-color: #8AA5DB;" | |||
| |align="left"|] | |||
| |align="center"|Thank you for voting in ], which '''passed''' with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. <br>{{-}} Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to ], ] and ] for their nominations.<br>{{-}} Thank you again, ]] | |||
| |} | |} | ||
| |} | |||
| <big>'''Content'''</big> | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-4}} | |||
| {| style="border:solid #FF99CC 1px; margin: 1px; padding: 4pt;" | |||
| |] | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="font-size:250%" align=center|] | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |- | |||
| |align=right style="font-size:70%"|] | |||
| |} | |||
| {{Col-4}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Col-4}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Col-4}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| == Message from {{user|immunize}} == | |||
| == April 2008 == | |||
| OK :) | |||
| == Re: TheNautilus RfC == | |||
| In initiating the RfCU, you're trying to establish a pattern of problematic conduct - while failing to understand policy would be part of it, it is rarely enough, so providing evidence of more direct policy violations would certainly help. | |||
| I notice you've said he uses another account. Again you will need evidence that it is the same person (a diff of him admitting it would help, but there are other ways to find out if there are none). But most of all, remember: policies apply per person, not account. See ] for more. | |||
| In any case, please don't hesitate to contact me if/when you do make any other substantial changes to that effect - I can then adjust my view accordingly. Best wishes in having the dispute resolved - ] (]) 15:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you. I was on my way to alert you to my comment when I found your reply.--] (]) 22:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem - it's only changing a few numbers. Thanks for the heads up. :) I do want to modify my view at some stage, but I'll wait for a few things to become clearer first. ] (]) 15:35, 24 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hi Tim, this doesn't really belong here but I didn't want to start a new section on the same subject when it doesn't really seem necessary. I've reviewed my interactions with TheNautalis on the only page we've edited in common (orthomolecular psychiatry). On that page we didn't have any interactions that struck me as particularly negative, and given that I don't think I will be commenting further on the RFC. Given WP:SOCK has apparently come up as allowing multiple accounts if segregated (and that's a stupid exception, isn't it?), there is no basis for me having any real complaint about his conduct. The only thing I could provide would be an external opinion on him by reviewing his contributions, and I don't think I'll have the time for that (plus, what does my opinion matter given a dearth of actual contact?) I will say that after reviewing his contributions on OMP, I would expect him to conflict with other editors, push for unsourceable statements that promote the "truth" of OMP/OMM, and am not surprised to see issues with interpretation of policy. But I have never personally hit up against sufficient conflict to be able to comment personally. ] (]) 19:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Systemic lupus erythematosus == | |||
| Hi Tim, | |||
| Could you have a look at the ] external links section? There's a lot of 'support' orgs and I'm betting a DMOZ would capture most, if not all. I'm still wading through my interactions with TheNautalis on ], I haven't really interacted with him/her much on OMM so I don't feel justified saying a whole lot about that situation. I have asked for the clarification regarding his/her possible multiple accounts but have yet to receive a reply. Thanks, ] (]) 13:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks Tim! Per ] I would remove all the links to support organizations, but I've always been unusually <s>vindictive</s> <s>harsh</s> <s>belligerent</s> ''rigourous'' in my interpretation of EL guidelines. I'm sorry if I don't get to commenting on the RFC in the near future or possibly at all, my editing time is considerably reduced these days. I'll try though. One thing I plan on is a RFCU if I do not get an unequivocal reply regarding the possible use of two separate accounts without disclosure. ] (]) 19:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Last Warning == | |||
| Tim, | |||
| Please explain how the recent entry ] is ] to ]? | |||
| ] (]) <small>—Preceding ] was added at 18:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Request for Peer Review help == | |||
| Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at ]. I have three requests to help this continue. | |||
| 1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with ''Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at ] (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...'' | |||
| 2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the ] page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month. | |||
| 3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at ]. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in. | |||
| Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. ] ''']''' 21:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Activation energy diagram == | |||
| Sure, just give me a few minutes! ]<small> (]·])</small> 17:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, how's ]? ]<small> (]·])</small> 18:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks... == | |||
| ...for . It's kind of how I felt but I wasn't getting any traction. (Clearly there's not a single correct answer.) <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] | ]</span></small> 18:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Cylindrospermopsin == | |||
| Hey Tim, thanks for your comments and help with this article. I saw your name on the peer review list and was going to ask you to have a look at it but you've beat me to the punch! I've left the article alone for a while to see what pops up on the PR and from other edits but I plan to action any suggestions soon. Any further comments/edits much appreciated, it would be good to get this to GA or FA status. Cheers ] (]) 22:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks! the sequel == | |||
| Hi Tim, | |||
| Your ongoing, not-so-subtle push for me to saddle up to some extra buttons is shameless and flattering. I really, really appreciate it, it's the best compliment anyone could give me. I persist in not feeling ready for it, but perhaps one day I will. | |||
| Incidentally, a second thanks. Your constant example of carefully and civily working your way through disputes is one of the main drivers in my efforts to improve my own conduct. It's always an effort, but having your good example gives me hope that it's possible and a goal to aspire to. D'you like pie? I've got a recipe for the best pie crust ever. It involves vodka. ] (]) 19:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Re: the message you just left - peer pressure works for smoking, maybe for adminship :) ] (]) 19:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Your note == | |||
| Thanks, Tim. About your note the other day regarding that article, I don't have any sources to hand that I'm aware of, and I've not had time to take a close look at it yet, because I have limited time to spend on WP at the moment. But I definitely will look at some point. <font color="Brown">]</font> <small><sup><font color="darkgreen">]</font><font color="Light green">]</font></sup></small> 04:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :You need a giant fan trained on your face; in the absence of that, hopefully you'll get some thunder soon. I always go for a walk when it breaks. I miss that kind of weather. :-) <font color="Brown">]</font> <small><sup><font color="darkgreen">]</font><font color="Light green">]</font></sup></small> 04:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == I would appreciate some feedback ... == | |||
| on the genetic code talk page before the figure being discussed is inserted. ] (]) 02:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for putting the draft spot up on the genetic code discussion page. I have one sentence to insert in the article, plus one figure, and 1 or 2 references. Please have a look when you have time, comment, and I will go through another iteration if necessary. Humorous email is coming in at this time saying that both you and I will be ''"banned from the internet in perpetuity"'' over that single sentence - if it goes into the article! I see this as data. Others see it as evidence for GDI or ID. ] (]) 01:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::You were correct in moving the new figure out of the evolution section of the genetic code. It's just data. ] (]) 06:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| For your kind offer.--] (]) 03:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| Hi Tim, once again the bald villain is at the centre of a huge conflict. What frustrates me is that other countries don't get even coverage on here (the other day I started severla African cities with a population over 100,000). Its so Angol-Centric/ I've seen data for countries like Madagascar become avilabale on line and suddenly we have over a 1000 articles with half decent starter content and I am certain over time decent information on these places will became availabale if it isn't already. How people can think ignoring 95% of the world is a good thing I don't know particularly when there are so many particuarly excellent articles that could be included. If something was done automatically in creating these articles I could change my focus to actually developing and wrtiting articles rather than spending virtually ALL of my time starting them. It would allow myself and the group of editors who develop such articles to build content and concentrate on quality once we have addressed the huge uneven bias problem. I would love to start translating some of those french articles too like I did with ], may not be a perfect translation but it is beyond the one liner it was two weeks ago. What is very concerning is that people automically assume that nothing could possibly be written about any of the articles createfd by the bot and then they will ALL remain useless forever. The untlimate goal is a full and detailed article on every main town and village in the world. I believe we have to make this happen given the scale of wikipedia and its diversity of editors from around the world and is a step in the right direction. I guarantee that if wikipedia researched these places in their native lanagues and within the countries involved on paper people would be absolutely amazed at what actually could be written, Its not our fault that a vast amount of Africa, Asia and Latin America haven't developed enough to display their information on a computer and the web. ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 19:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Tim is everything OK? I feel like there is some reason you don't respond to me anymore. I'm expanding those french places as we speak!! Am I no longer worth having my head polished? ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 21:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I was concerned. Hey I just expanded ]. If this bot was allowed to operate, I could change my focus on wikipedia towards writing and developing the damn articles!!! If a bot had created those French articles instead of having to do them it could have generated them all first time with adequate infoboxes and some paragraphs of information and references and time now could have been spent expanding them. The same is for the rest of the world!! If I could be put at ease that other places are on the road to developing equally then my editing would become purely expnading them rather than creating them! Hope you are well. ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 21:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at ], ], was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) ] monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) ]; 3) Manually updating ]; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. ] (]) 17:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Inquiry about TheNautilus == | |||
| I'm not completely sure that's what was intended but it certainly looks plausible. I suggest you discuss this with AvB who had more involvement in that matter then I did. ] (]) 23:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Baginni prot == | |||
| I noticed the prot on the article has , but the prot tag is still on it. I decided not to remove it, because I wasn't sure whether you left it there on purpose. <big>] (])</big> 19:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :You're welcome, but it's most strange indeed. I actually found out when I misread ''July'' 2 for ''June'' 2 and logged out to verify. <big>] (])</big> 19:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Tim, I think it's because when the protection level is changed, it has to change to something different. So if it's s-protected and changed only to a different name, it seems to revert to unprotected. Bit of a bug in the system by the look of it. <font color="Brown">]</font> <small><sup><font color="darkgreen">]</font><font color="Light green">]</font></sup></small> 19:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == mischief == | |||
| Now here's a curious thing. A few days ago when I looked at the history of the Baginni page history, it was quite clear that my edits were removed by one 'Hicklup' who had also made a wholesale deletion of comments by docmartincohen a few edits back. Curious about his user, I looked at his user page, and it contained only edits to the Baginni page. But now all these episodes have gone! The hickleup version of Baginni just does not exist! Hickleup the user and his history has gone! | |||
| Tim, someone is falsifying the 'histories' on Misplaced Pages. I think you won't nedd to look very far to see who it is. Surely you can see that this is wrong. | |||
| I'm disappointed that you failed to understand that my complaint was not about the edits to the article, but about their wholse slae nature plus the 'blocking' of the page, that pre-empted further negotiation. That said, I write again as I got the impression that whether you agreed with me or not, you were trying to be honest. | |||
| ] (]) 21:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Tim, | |||
| It would be good if your page could accurately reflectactivity anyway. So here's the first thing. You posted me this invitiaton: | |||
| {{Tb|immunize}} | |||
| 1. " If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{tnull|helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tim Vickers (talk) 20:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)"" | |||
| 2. Then I requested your help, to prevent somone who started a page from blocking edits on it that they did not agree with. I indicated I was quite prepared to accept my original edits were not to be 'reverted' but I wanted to find a consensaul version. | |||
| == Message from immunize == | |||
| 3. Without contacting me or making any attempt at communication you imposed your own 'padlocking' of the page. | |||
| {{tb|immunize}} | |||
| Hey, thanks for the help! No need to write again! | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] (]) 12:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter == | |||
| == Templates == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron/February 2012 Newsletter notice}} | |||
| Hey Tim, | |||
| == about removed article == | |||
| The templates {{tl|ArticleHistory}} and {{tl|NewsBanners}} being used on ] look like they need a little bit of tweaking. I'd try and fix it myself but they're protected. If you compare the {{tl|NewsBanners}} and {{tl|WikiProjectBanners}} templates, you'll see the text is slightly off center in the NewsBanners template. It looks like someone has already fixed the WikiProjectBanners template, so I think you should be able to just copy across that fix. Likewise, the ''Article milestones'' text in the ArticleHistory template is slightly off center, but I'm not sure that fix will be so straight forward. Cheers, ] (]) 12:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC). | |||
| Hello Tim, | |||
| == User:GODhack == | |||
| I created article about artist Dimitry Gerrman, but when I tried to add it to wikipedia I got message that you removed on 09/29/2009 another article with the same name, because copyright problems. My article is the new one. Could you please help me to add this article or please explain what could I do at this case. | |||
| Hi Tim, thanks for moving that comment, I didn't realise I put it at User instead of Talk. | |||
| Thank you.] (]) 10:42, 02/14/2012 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Cheers | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ] (]) 13:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>'''unused image, the source file has been deleted, and the licence is no longer verifiable'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == Image:HEPPS.png == | |||
| Hi Tim, | |||
| Would you mind if I deleted ] so that a on Commons could "show through" instead? -- ] (]) 14:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for taking care of it. -- ] (]) 02:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == Content forking dicussion at FAC == | |||
| Tim, can you peek in at ] ? ] (]) 14:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> --] (]) 17:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Julian Baggini unprotection request == | |||
| :I've removed this tag, because there's an unfortunate circle going on here. The source file was deleted because it wasn't being used due to this file format being preferred, and now we want to delete the preferred copy because the source file was deleted in favor of this one. If we need to have the license of the source file visible to non-admins, then the source file should be restored. ] (]) 18:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ]. I declined to unprotect it until you've had your input. Thanks! ] ] 16:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I posted a request on ] --] (]) 18:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, why is it protected? ] <sup>]</sup> 19:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:31, 29 January 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. TimVickers has not edited Misplaced Pages since 13 December 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| ||||
|
|
| Peer reviews with no or minimal feedback |
|---|
|
|
|
|
If your review is not in the list of unanswered reviews, you can add it. |
You have a message
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thank you for the invitation. I will try to follow the Enzyme Kinetics article and make contributions when I can. User:Todd40324 (talk) 9:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Homo Sapiens interbreed with Homo Neanderthalensis
I have provided some additional sources which the general reader can also understand. For us scientists, youtube may seem an unreliable source, but that is only the case if the source itself is unreliable, which is why I have collected videos from somewhat reputable sources such as the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and others. This is so the general public can also partake and understand some of the main concepts of human evolution whereas if I only used peer reviewed scientific journals, the only people reading them would be the small minority of scientists on planet Earth. But as source of reference I will nonetheless continue to include peer reviewed scientific sources so that the scientific community will began to understand that human evolution is not the way they want it to be, but far more complicated series of migrations, evolution due to the selective pressure of their respective geographical location and possible interbreedings resulting in the modern day Homo Sapiens who happen to be part Homo Neanderthalensis and the Chinese anatomically modern Homo Erectus who may either be part Homo Neanderthalensis due to possible interbreeding or it is possible the Homo Erectus in China did not significantly interbreed with the Homo Neanderthalensis and that the anatomically modern Chinese Homo Erectus alive today simply retain what seems to be "neanderthal" genes because the Neanderthals were direct descendants of Homo Heidelbergensis which happens to be either a separate species or subspecies of Homo Erectus, and as such they both carry similar genes and passed them into their progeny in both respective evolutionary branches. Thank you! Please watch :
1.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpQiBPdFtog&NR=1
2.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9zVEQCIiRs&feature=related
Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
| ||||
Content
|
|
Message from immunize (talk · contribs)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message from immunize
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Misplaced Pages:RSMED
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
| |||
about removed article
Hello Tim,
I created article about artist Dimitry Gerrman, but when I tried to add it to wikipedia I got message that you removed on 09/29/2009 another article with the same name, because copyright problems. My article is the new one. Could you please help me to add this article or please explain what could I do at this case.
Thank you.User:Markus50 (talk) 10:42, 02/14/2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Organic Apple.jpg
The file File:Organic Apple.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused image, the source file has been deleted, and the licence is no longer verifiable
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've removed this tag, because there's an unfortunate circle going on here. The source file was deleted because it wasn't being used due to this file format being preferred, and now we want to delete the preferred copy because the source file was deleted in favor of this one. If we need to have the license of the source file visible to non-admins, then the source file should be restored. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I posted a request on Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_undeletion#File:Organic_Apple.png --TheImaCow (talk) 18:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
