Misplaced Pages

User talk:Pedrito: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:29, 10 June 2008 editTenPoundHammer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers278,961 edits Gaza: r← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:03, 6 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(134 intermediate revisions by 48 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|counter = 1 |counter = 1
|algo = old(14d) |algo = old(14d)
|archive = User talk:Pedro Gonnet/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Pedrito/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}


== ] == == Note to myself... ==


, <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']''' - 26.01.2009 13:28</small><br/>
{| class="messagebox standard-talk plainlinks" style="padding:5px; width:auto;"
, <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']''' - 27.03.2009 07:37</small>
| ]
| ] is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Palestine on Misplaced Pages. Start by adding your name to the list of members at ]. ''Ahlan wa Sahlan!'' (Welcome!)
|}


== requested amendment of WB/JS arbitration case ==
== Re: signature ==


I have filed a request to amend the West Bank - Judea and Samaria arbitration case. See ]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 20:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)</font></small>
Hi there! I use ] to generate my signature. Normally, you're not allowed to use templates in signatures, but I use ] to get around it. What you have to do is create your own template in the vein of mine, and then use a raw signature of <code><nowiki>{{subst:User:Pedro Gonnet/sig}}</nowiki></code> or whatever. You can format your timestamp using the variables outlined ]. The only difference is, instead of signing with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>, you'll have to sign with <code><nowiki>~~~</nowiki></code>. The only other thing is that you should add yourself to ], or ] will start duplicating your timestamp. If you need any other help, just post on my talk page. Cheers! <small style="border:#090 1px solid;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap">''']<big style="color:#090">.</big>]''' ''at 18:55, 10/10/2007''</small>


== Motion regarding ] ==
== Signature test ==


By of the Arbitration Committee voted on at ],
Testing, <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']''' - 11.10.2007 07:55</small>

== ] - Characteristics ==

Thanks for the improved topic heading. :) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==

I noticed the reversions going on with this article. Do you have a source for "The Republic East of the Uruguay"? --] <sup><font face="Calibri">''] ♦ ]''</font></sup> 17:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

:Hi Niel! I admit, it's a debated issue, but as a Uruguayan and native Spanish speaker I go for the definition I leaned at school and which is also used by the (see the English pages, click on the flag lower left and then Information->General Information). Honestly, I was more irritated by it's being the accounts only edit, without debate, and I followed ]. Cheers, <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']''' - 03.04.2008 18:03</small>

::The concern that I have is that "The Republic East of the Uruguay" returns less than 20 google hits (not counting wikipedia) while "Eastern Republic of Uruguay" returns 286,000 and "Oriental Republic of Uruguay" returns 52,000. That link you gave me has "Oriental Republic of Uruguay":
<blockquote> <blockquote>
The ] placed on {{user|Nishidani}} in the ''West Bank - Judea and Samaria'' case are lifted effective at the passage of this motion. Nishidani is reminded that articles in the area of conflict, which is identical to the area of conflict as defined by the ], remain the subject of discretionary sanctions; should he edit within this topic area, those discretionary sanctions continue to apply.
The Oriental Republic of Uruguay is named after its geographic location to the east of the Uruguay River. This geographical reason as well as historical reasons caused the Uruguayans to be called 'Orientals', even if, obviously, Uruguay is situated in the Western Hemisphere. As for the word 'Uruguay', it comes form the Guarani language, meaning 'river where the birds live'.
</blockquote> </blockquote>
--] <sup><font face="Calibri">'']]''</font></sup> 18:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC) For the Arbitration Committee, ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 17:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
:: Translation is always a matter of judgment, and there's no reason for WP to go with the most common translation rather than the best one. In Spanish, "Oriental Republic of the Uruguay" might make sense, but in English it implies that the republic is ''in'' the East, rather than lying ''to'' the east of something. Thus the translation we have is a better rendition into English. It should remain, unless "Oriental Republic" is an official English title. -- ] (]) 19:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
:::If there's no "official" English title then why have one in the article? Just leave the Spanish one. --] <sup><font face="Calibri">''] ♦ ]''</font></sup> 19:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
:::: Because it's an English encyclopaedia, so it needs to be translated into English; how it's translated is up to the editors' judgment. -- ] (]) 20:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

== Palestinian territories ==

Hello Pedro,
I was reading: ], ] and ]. The articles gives the impression that the Israeli occupation of those territories is ambiguous, and you almost get the idea that they are not occupied. Is this factual? And on the other side we have the explicit title: ]...

So I have to ask again, what is the criteria to consider a territory occupied? UN resolutions? international low? ] (]) 08:04, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

:We have international consensus that the territories are occupied; ], ], ], ] and ]. So, why is WP presenting this case as an issue of dispute and ambiguous? because some pro-Israeli editors do not like it?
:I have been reading the articles, and the only sources that object to the term "occupied" and suggest the term "disputed" are Israeli references: , , . Can we call those references ] in the context of Palestinian-Israeli conflict? ] (]) 12:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

== Comment ==

As a person who keeps mentioning ], you seem to be making far more reverts than talk page contributions. Please stop acting like you're in a ]. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 12:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

:Did both of you really think that there wouldn't be consequences for all that edit warring? ] 13:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

::Sorry, I must have gotten a bit carried away... How would you suggest we proceed? Cheers, <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']''' - 11.04.2008 13:28</small>

:::Don't revert more than once per 24 hours, both of you. ] 14:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

::::Roger. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']''' - 11.04.2008 14:17</small>

Note:
Your recent source related activity is highly questionable. I suggest you give a long hard look at ] and ]. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 15:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

== Please pursue ] for the ] dispute ==

You are currently involved in an ]{{#if:Gilad Shalit|&#32;at ]}}. Please remember that such behaviour '''does not''' benefit Misplaced Pages in any way, and in fact you may be blocked for it (especially, but not always, if you have made ] reverts in 24 hours).

Therefore, please remember: if you are having a dispute with somebody over an article, you '''must''' follow the ] process - that is, ] with the other parties. Sometimes, that is all it takes: leave a message on their talk page, and come to an agreement ] and peacefully. Once again, bear in mind that revert warring is not acceptable and you may be ] for it: you should consider this a final warning on the matter. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ] me.

''Kind regards'',<br>] 11:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

== ] mediation: please indicate dis/agreement ==

A ] has been filed with the ] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at ], and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Misplaced Pages, please refer to ]. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, ] 14:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
:''Addendum'': I'd strongly encourage you to agree; this dispute needs put to bed. The choice is, of course, yours. ] 14:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


==Request for mediation accepted==
{| class="messagebox" style="width:90%"
|-
|]
|A ] to which you were are a party has been ].<br>You can find more information on the case subpage, ].</center><br>
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <font face="Verdana">]]</font> 17:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
|}
<small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</small></center>

== You guys owe me ==

Where would you be after all without my ? Sorry, but that just made my Sunday morning! --] (]) 11:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

== Your new signature ==

Friendly suggestion: please compare it to the established signature of the prolific ]. They're similar enough to have me do a double take, in light of your user name. But that might just be me! Thanks, ] (]) 18:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

== An idea worth trying? ==
Hi, here's a thought that might do some good. Today I was chatting with an editor from Serbia. Mentioned the Serbian-Croatian ethnic disputes on en:Wiki and he surprised me by telling me the Serbian and Croatian Wikipedias actually get along pretty well. Basically what happened was some guys packed into a car, drove to Zagreb, and shook some hands. Then some other guys packed into another car, drove to Belgrade, and shook some hands. Once they saw that they were all pretty normal people, things calmed down a lot.

Maybe there's a way we can replicate that. Would you be willing to try a voice chat on Skype? I've noticed that when Misplaced Pages editors get into a conference call, with voices instead of just text, it's easier to find common ground. Wishing you well, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 06:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

== Benjamin Franklin ==

Pedrito, just by serendipity I noted a few minutes ago that Uri Avnery attributes that same quote to Albert Einstein (sounds more like him, but I haven't done a netcheck) Whatever, regards ] (]) 17:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

== AE thread ==

I have closed ]. Please read the closing note. If you have any questions or if there any problems, please feel free to drop a line on my talk page or send me an email. ] (]) 02:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

== Exodus ==
So where does it belong? ] (]) 14:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

:Hi Kaisershatner,
:As the ] appears to be a reaction to the Palestinian exodus, I would recommend adding it to the section ]. You could build a sub-section using material from ] which link to the Palestinian exodus.
:Cheers and thanks, <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']''' - 16.05.2008 14:29</small>

==Mediation==
I have agreed to mediate the discussion in the ] case, if accepted by the participants. I have experience mediating in the world outside Misplaced Pages and have completed the Dispute Resolution Program at the Justice Institute of British Columbia, Canada. I have been a Misplaced Pages contributor since 2003 and have informally mediated several cases, including one for MedCab (which was concluded successfully). I have applied to join the Mediation Committee. As a mediator, my role would be to facilitate discussion. My approach would include the following:
* Listen to all participants
* Help formulate an agenda
* Identify common interests
* Identify pertinent facts/policies/research that would assist participants in forming agreement
* Facilitate an agreement and action plan.

As a non-member of Medcom, the convention is for participants to approve the mediator. Please indicate your response ]. ] (]) 22:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

:Thanks for your vote of confidence in the process in the RfM for ].

:I suggest that we start with an opening statement from each of the participants on the RfM ]. I've also suggested a few groundrules there. If at any time you wish to contact me privately via e-mail, please feel free to do so . Best wishes. ] (]) 22:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


== ] ==
::You mentioned you would be back on Tuesday (just past). We need to get the discussion going. Would you be willing to join in now? ] (]) 19:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
== Gaza ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692040667 -->


==Asian 10,000 Challenge invite==
I was sent to the article per suggestion of someone on IRC. You're removing sourced info, and it doesn't look like original research to me; I don't see where it's repeated in the article. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 15:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. The ] has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland ] and ]. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like ]. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current ] which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 11:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
*It was ] who contacted me. I don't really see the problem here, so I would suggest talking it out with them if you haven't already, or maybe file a ]. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 15:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:03, 6 March 2023

Note to myself...

, pedrito - talk - 26.01.2009 13:28
, pedrito - talk - 27.03.2009 07:37

requested amendment of WB/JS arbitration case

I have filed a request to amend the West Bank - Judea and Samaria arbitration case. See here. nableezy - 20:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Motion regarding Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria

By motion of the Arbitration Committee voted on at requests for amendment,

The editing restrictions placed on Nishidani (talk · contribs) in the West Bank - Judea and Samaria case are lifted effective at the passage of this motion. Nishidani is reminded that articles in the area of conflict, which is identical to the area of conflict as defined by the Palestine-Israel articles case, remain the subject of discretionary sanctions; should he edit within this topic area, those discretionary sanctions continue to apply.

For the Arbitration Committee, Hersfold 17:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Misplaced Pages:The 10,000 Challenge and Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Misplaced Pages:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoLo dicono a Signa. 11:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)