Revision as of 16:38, 26 August 2005 view sourceBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,392 edits →Prat: Don't delete the comments of other users. If these are all your socks, tough.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:10, 20 January 2025 view source Z1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators30,537 edits Los Angeles Lakers listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archives|bot=MiszaBot III|age=30|archivelist=User talk:Zoe/Archives}} | |||
==Archives== | |||
-I'm moving the earlier versions of the Talk page to ]. -- ] 20:57 Oct 8, 2002 (UTC)<br/> | |||
<!--<sub>Subscript text</sub>{{message}}--> | |||
Moving talk to ] - ] 02:11 Nov 8, 2002 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 02:44 Dec 4, 2002 (UTC) | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 20:40 Dec 24, 2002 (UTC) | |||
{| class="infobox" width="270px" | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 03:48 Jan 17, 2003 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 23:20 Jan 26, 2003 (UTC) | |||
!align="center"|]<br>] | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 00:10 Feb 24, 2003 (UTC) | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 05:42 Mar 30, 2003 (UTC) | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 05:20 Apr 17, 2003 (UTC) | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 23:18 Apr 27, 2003 (UTC) | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 22:09 25 May 2003 (UTC) | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 05:39 17 Jun 2003 (UTC) | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 20:12, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC) | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 20:25, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
<br/>Moving talk to ] - ] 21:38, August 21, 2005 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
|- | |||
| | |||
* ] | |||
* | |||
* | |||
|}<!--Template:Talkarchives--> | |||
== Please don't leave == | |||
Please don't leave, Zoe. I'm very saddened by what happened in the last few days, but it ''can'' blow over. We've never edited the same articles, and would probably disagree on a lot, but I've always seen you as someone who cared a lot about Misplaced Pages and who was good for the project. I am quite sure that Jimbo would not want his hasty words to lead to any permanent hurt, and it's quite obvious from looking at his contributions that he was preoccupied with real life matters for a few days after his phonecall with Mr Pierce, which would explain why no notification of that phonecall was given to the community. It's also clear that his post on ] was written hastily, as he had been away from Misplaced Pages for a few days before, and didn't post anything immediately after, so it's very likely that he forced himself to find time to make a post in order to close the matter immediately, but didn't take the time word it in such a way as to take into account that you were trying to protect Misplaced Pages and that you didn't know it had been resolved. His own on his talk page two days later indicate that he did not have any wish to hurt you. Please, Zoe, don't let this lead to a permanent break with Misplaced Pages. You are highly valued here. ]] 17:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Desysopped == | |||
In case you return, someone just used your account (among others) saying it had been hacked. It's been emergency desysopped. —] (]) 15:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:In case you just randomly read this page: I miss you. - ] 23:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:From that old discussion, I don't see why anyone had to make such a big fuss about it. Thankfully, they're both in better places now. ] (]) 21:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Proposed deletion of ]== | |||
] | |||
A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 19:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Otto Fruhner== | |||
Zoe, | |||
You once deleted ] because a vandal had posted nonsense. As a matter of politesse, I am informing you that I am re-establishing it as a legitimate biographical article of a World War I flyer. | |||
] (]) 09:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
== NowCommons: File:H59543.png == | |||
] is now available on ] as ]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Misplaced Pages, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Misplaced Pages, in this case: <nowiki>]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --] (]) 12:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
<!-- ncnotifier --> | |||
==AfD nomination of Devoucoux== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ] (]) 21:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
I linked it to Sare in the Basque contrie and horse tackel. The AfD result was a ' '''Keep''' ' result.] (]) 09:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Minnesota Meetup== | |||
<hr style="background:#fc6; border:#0cf 10px dotted;"> | |||
<div style="float:left; padding:10px 10px 0 0; clear:left">]</div><div style="float:left; clear:none; padding:10px"><div style="font-size:150%; padding-bottom:0.5em">2009</div><div style="font-size:120%">Proposed date: Saturday, October 10.<br/> ].<br/></div></div><div style="font-size:100%; float:right; padding:10px">Please share this with anyone who may be interested. </div> | |||
<hr style=" clear:both; background:#fc6; border:#0cf 10px dotted;"> | |||
<div style="clear:both; font-size:xx-small; text-align:right;">Delivered by ] (]) 22:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)</div> | |||
==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
] Hello Zoe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''4''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Charles Wadsworth}}</small> (I'm trying to exspand it)--] (]) 16:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Ivan Davis}}</small> | |||
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Marsha Mason}}</small> | |||
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Robert E. Connick}}</small> | |||
Thanks!--] (]) 23:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== November 9, 1985 listed at ] == | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''November 9, 1985'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== ] nomination of ] == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> -- ] (]) - 03:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
The AfD result was a- ''''' 'Keep' ''''' result!--] (]) 02:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
==File source problem with File:NurembergTrials.jpg== | |||
] | |||
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. | |||
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''' per Misplaced Pages's ], ]. If the image is ] and ], '''the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)''' per ] criterion ]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Pokemon/Blastoise listed at ] == | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pokemon/Blastoise'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Pokemon/Bulbasaur listed at ] == | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pokemon/Bulbasaur'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at ] == | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pokemon/Mewtwo'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at ] == | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pokemon/Mewtwo'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] 18:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC). | |||
==Awards== | |||
During your 5 years hear, you made enough edits to become a ] grade editor.] (]) 12:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{User Labutnum}}<br clear="all"/> | |||
Well it was more than five years, but at any rate, due to the recent Service award reforms, your level was actually these:<br clear="all"/> | |||
{{Labutnum III Userbox}}<br clear="all"/> | |||
{{Senior Editor III Userbox}}<br clear="all"/> | |||
{{Senior Editor III Ribbon}}<br clear="all"/> | |||
It says that this account was compromised... if you have a new account, you may of course count the start time and edits of this (old) account in determining your service award level for the new account. | |||
At any rate, thank you for your long service and many contributions to the Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 21:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 22:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
== A page you started (Muscat) has been reviewed! == | |||
Thanks for creating ], Zoe! | |||
Misplaced Pages editor ] just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: | |||
<blockquote>Reviewed, well done!</blockquote> | |||
To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's ]. | |||
<small>Learn more about ].</small> | |||
] (]) 02:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 08:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 18:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 19:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>Fictional being/race. No indication of passing ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 05:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>No indication this fictional character passes ]/]. Pure ].</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 06:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>No evidence this fictional group of characters passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 04:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 13:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure ]. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to ]</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure ]. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to ]</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>No indication this fictional race passes ]/]. Pure ]. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 11:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
==explanation== | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
now I am trying to put this in proper format bur I'm used to being a vandal in that position you have sure about proper format | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
I am not a racist | |||
<blockquote>No indication this very minor supporting character passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
And I have not said anything racist | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
this is a shared computer may explain any racist posts | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
And I thought about creating a legitimate account but I'm fairly sure you would all ban me Just to get back at me for being a vandal | |||
<blockquote>No indication this very minor supporting character passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
==Another Keetoowah Sighting== | |||
Hey, just wanted to give you a heads up that ] vandalized ] user page. I'll add it to his RfC. I figured you'd be interested since you two seem to have a little bit of a history. ] 21:55, 21 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] was inconclusive, but there seemed agreement that total rewrite was needed. Oh dear: see ]. As Shatner would say, "McKhaaan!" ] 17:41, 22 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
== ] userpage vandalism == | |||
<blockquote>No indication this minor supporting character passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
Just a heads up, V: Boycottthecaf vandalised ]'s user page a little while ago. I didn't feel right blocking him as it seems like the first bad faith thing he's done all day, but since you seem to be watchdogging him, I thought I'd brind it to your attention. ] ]/] 02:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
==Japanese emperors== | |||
Not to worry; there was a long discussion at the Japanese MoS about how to name Japanese Emperors, and those "double" redirects are alternative names that we agreed that we should have that are pointing to places where the article was going to wind up. I'm moving the articles in now, and those redirs all become single redirs when I do so. ] ] 02:48, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
==Christopher Walken== | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
I don't know why you protected the page. I saw the same thing on the Headline News ticker. As far as the IPs, look them up . We're different people. --] 06:23, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
== Your blocking of 24.64.223.203 == | |||
<blockquote>No indication this very minor supporting character passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
Hi, I don't think you should have blocked the user {{user|24.64.223.203}}. You gave the reason as 'repeated vandalism to ]', but actually only the last one of their contributions was vandalism - the previous ones were in my opinion legitimate attempts to add information (it's only that the information was unencyclopaedic). We shouldn't be so eager to block new users, it gives them a bad picture of the project and the community. (In fact, I think we've just lost a prospective new user there, mainly because of inconsiderate reverting of their edits.) - ] ] 08:10, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
: Er, they were warned exactly '''once'''. You blocked them immediately after they were warned '''once''' - they didn't even have a chance to disregard the warning. The edits the same IP address has done yesterday can't by no means be assumed to be by the same person, since they were of an entirely different kind (and this is a shared IP after all). - ] ] 08:17, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] VfD... == | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
I just wanted to drop you a note and thank you for your work on the VfD. I obviously disagreed, but you were right on the criteria and it was a good learning experience....and no, I'm not being sarcastic. :) ] 17:46, August 23, 2005 (UTC) | |||
* BTW: Can you clean up (ie delete) ]? It's now a redirect to a redlink. We might as well do it right. I left a note on ] (as he/she did the VfD closure) but I'd just as soon get it finished. I think it could be safely covered under the VfD. Thanks. ] 01:52, August 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Recent additions to "be bold" == | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
User:Zoe: The recent additions to ] were not an attempt to add "nonsense" to the page, and it is unfortunate and regrettable that it was viewed as such. It is just and proper that it was reverted. Please note that sending feedback to an IP-based "talk" page and then blocking it prevents any two-way communication, which is probably not very encouraging to non-admin-usernames. The feedback, while terse, is more helpful than utter silence, which is a common a tactic among other admin-usernames. You are a better admin-username for providing such feedback. This message itself is not an attempt to have the last word. If you post your rebuttal to that same page, mostly likely, a real person will read it and continue to learn what is acceptable and what is not. Note that there is a great deal of violence depicted in the ] page (and in the original movie in a highly graphic manner) and at many other pages dealing with subjects of entertainment and an ever-growing amount of gratuitous nudity-based photographic pornography at Misplaced Pages (mostly in user sub-pages) such as that referred to in ]. Note also that genuine violence that occurs in wars and in the crime-based stories such as ], or the threat of future full-scale nuclear war, are glossed over or ignored entirely. Those phenomena can lead to confusion about what Misplaced Pages is all about, specifically if it is more about fiction or non-fiction. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 04:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
Note also that username with a profile like ], which focuses almost exclusively on entertainment and wife-beating pages is the same username that stripped the ] page of all of its supporting documentation (including the references to the Congressional records), and you will understand why some take a dim view of the future level of scholarship at Misplaced Pages. | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
] 19:54, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure ] and list of appearances in media. Fails ], ], ]. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
== Thank note == | |||
Thank you for cleaning up my user page after vandalism. :) -- < ] | ] > 22:02, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
== A belated welcome back == | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
Hi, I only just realized that you are editing here again, so welcome back! My rough estimate is that you get as many comments on your talk page per week as I get in three years—I don't know what I'm doing wrong. :) All the best, ]] 22:44, August 23, 2005 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
== Fenian Swine == | |||
Thanks for that.I really apreciate you doing it behind my back.--] 23:16, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== False Accusations of Racism == | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
In the future, I would appreciate it if you did not accuse me of making racist statements without backing it up with proof. I was deeply utterly completly offended to be labeled like that, expecially since you lost your temper about it an threatened to block me. This makes the management of Misplaced Pages look bad. Please exercise more patience and use a level head in the future. I would like to be your ''special'' friend. Thank you. --] 04:10, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
'' And if you didn't make racist comments, you wouldn't be accused of it'' The thing is, you haven't pointed out where I have said anything racist, you are just lobbing that attack at me without proof. Please stop. That is inconsiderate. I believe your admin powers should be taken away if you cannot behave responsibly. --] 05:16, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== My userpage, thanks == | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Hi Zoe! Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage while I was off guard. ] ] 06:23, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 23:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
:If only I knew. I think it is related to me blocking a userpage vandal. This guy sent me about five e-mails as well. See ]. ] ] 08:44, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
== "Octagon, disambiguation" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Octagon, disambiguation'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 06:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
==Sara-Marie Fedele== | |||
She's from the Australian not the US series of Big Brother. She's listed in the 2001 section. I changed the redirect. ] 08:05, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
:I didn't know either but I was checking the creator's other stuff and noticed they had links to australia. ] 08:10, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
==Pat Robertson== | |||
It belongs on the Tuesday, because that is the date on every single one of the News Reports. UTC time, it was added to Mondays reports on the Tuesday, i.e, the wrong day. --]\<sup>]</sup> 09:30, August 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 08:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
* It's not really that funny, considering .. Tuesday. --]\<sup>]</sup> 21:15, August 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
** Misplaced Pages operates under ], not Californian time.--]\<sup>]</sup> 21:28, August 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
*** Yeah, i used to think the same till Several of my edits were reverted and moved owing to being in the wrong day ]. --]\<sup>]</sup> 21:37, August 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
**** cool, I posted there. --]\<sup>]</sup> 21:43, August 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
==Deletion?== | |||
I'm pretty baffled by your message Zoe, perhaps you can rephrase your comments on votes for deletion, since I can't see anything about my votes there which is questionable, with the possible exception of an occasion where I merged some content into another article, not realising that this was not supposed to happen. In voting on that page, I have been very careful to read the guidelines before voting, and to try to apply the guidelines to the voting process, rather than my notions of what is important or interesting. Perhaps you can point out some examples of votes that you object to? Thanks, ] 15:26, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Every single one of Trollderella's VfD votes has been keep. He has yet to vote to delete a single item. And even on articles which are clearly delete-worthy (like items which go on Wikitext or Wikisource), he votes keep. Zoe 20:26, August 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
::Hi Zoe, I'm sorry you think that voting to keep things is a problem, I was not aware that there was any requirement to vote to delete a certain number of things, I often pass over things that look like they should be deleted because they already have a lot of delete votes. I am not sure which things you are talking about that are 'clearly delete-worthy', the things that I vote on are things that I have looked at, and evaluated carefully against the deletion guidelines, and that I believe do not meet them. The fact that there is a voting system implies to me that there is some abiguity about how to treat them. I'm sorry if you disagree with my judgements, and disapointed that you seem offended by them. By all means, if you disagree, then vote to delete them - I won't take it personally, and would encourage you not to as well - I hope we can learn to live with different opinions, Yours, ] 21:03, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 00:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
==Prat== | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
Mr. Swine is an unserious non-contributor to the project and has been harassing me and other members of wiki. I demand some action, hopefully a permanent ban. ] 23:49, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:I agree.He vandilised my user page and even though you hate me I still expect you to act on these requests.--] 23:52, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Apreciate that.He was a menace or a troll or whatever you want to call him.--] 00:08, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
:*Good work banning Mr. Swine. He was an A-hole as you americans like to say.] 00:46, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
::*I see Mr Swine has had his "indefinate" ban revoked after 24 measly hours and he gets to harass me again. I implore you to ban him permanently for the good of the project.] 00:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
== Membership removal == | |||
<blockquote>I don't think this page is needed.</blockquote> | |||
] removed your membership from ]. If you object to this, I'd recommend you make some hay about it on his or the project's talk page. {{Unsigned|Lulu of the Lotus Eaters|LULU}} | |||
:Anyone who thinks an obscene image belongs on every article in Misplaced Pages cannot possibly be in keeping with the scope of the project. It is a violation of ]...disrupting an article to make a point. Next time Lulu, sign your message.--] 06:35, August 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Under the ], pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. | |||
::And aside from contirbuting zero to discussion, your sole contribution (in sharp contrast to the scope of the project) is this disruptive "membership" as you orignally posted it: "] 06:48, August 17, 2005 (UTC) - I would like to see a standard which requires an obscene image on every page.]]"...and you threaten to block me if I remove it again...now that is admin abuse if I ever saw it. How about this, repost your membership like an adult, just sign and state that you disagree with the projects attempts to "censor" or something along those lines...I can deal with that. What would be the criteria for my being blocked since I saw your orignal membership comment to be a violation of and removed it? Serious...don't get angry, perhaps I am overlooking something.--] 06:54, August 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Talk%3ACarl+XVI+Gustaf|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> ] (]) 02:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::NO response, just a threat...and based on what...vandalism? It is not vandalism if my edit is in good faith and I see your edit as a violation of wikipedia:point. Nevermind.--] 08:05, August 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
==Zambian Boys== | |||
Hi Zoe, I wonder whether you saw my message on your talk page above, since you did not respond to it, but continue to make accusations on my talk page. I am not sure why you think my vote on Zambian Boys is problematic, (# keep, for the moment, at least. I am worried that there may be good reason why this band doesn't have many google hits. More research needed. Trollderella 16:44, 25 August 2005 (UTC)) I may be wrong, and more research may well show that this article is not suitable. I voted as I did because I thought that the lister's reason (insufficent google hits) seemed flimsy, and it would do no harm to gather more information. I don't know what about that you found unreasonable, but invite you to explain a little more. Frankly, I find your tone a little hostile. Looking forward to hearing from you, ] 20:10, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Zoe, I beg to differ, I did not make a judgement about the author of the article, but rather assessed the article on it's own merits. I did not find that it clearly met the criteria for deletion. I agree that, on being made aware of the history of the contributor, it may need even more scrutiny, but, while I respect your right to disagree with my vote, I am beginning to resent your repreated accusations. You have not, so far as I can see, chosen to vote on this article, but it would seem to me that, if you disagree with my assessment, the correct course of action is to vote as you see fit, rather than harrassing users who vote as they see fit. Yours, ] 20:18, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
I replied on my talk page Zoe, and on the Ladner Trunk Road vfd. ] 20:40, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
== Have I offended? == | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 1#BokmaalAndNynorsk}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="border:1px solid;padding:2px 6px;font-variant:small-caps">'''〜 ] • ]'''</span> 06:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
I have noticed that on each and everyone of my votes for/against deletion you have drawn attention to the fact that I have few edits under my belt. My concers are two: 1) where is it stated that you have to have a certain number of edits to make your vote count, and 2) did you notice my claim to be an inclusionist rather than a deletionists? This does not mean that I am going to be adding useless information but it does mean that I would like to see that real articles have a decent chance of become usefull info sourses. Furthermore, I am fairly certain that I responded to one of your responses to my votes, but it seems to have vanished? Is this accurate or am I mistaken? Thank you very much ] 22:59, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
:I stand corrected, my responce remains...] 23:01, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
== You made me laugh... == | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
And almost choke on a carrot. - ]]] 01:23, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Your comments== | |||
Zoe, I don't know why you feel the need to constantly comment, in a way that I find rude and unwelcome, on my votes on vfd. However, I would invite you, next time you feel the urge, to consider whether your and my time might be better spent writing or editing an article, instead of trading insults. Thanks for sharing, yours, ] 07:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Zoe, I don't know why you find it hard to accept that there are people who disagree with you, but I suggest that you dial it down a little, for the sake of everyone's blood pressure. It's a vote. Please try to respect other's opinions. ] 07:09, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
::With respect, Zoe, you started this thread, with abusive comments, and are ending it with abusive comments. If you don't wish to have anything to do with me, that's fine - simply don't post abuse on my talk page. ] 07:16, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
==Judiciary Act== | |||
Zoe, I need admin feedback: Was what I did with the VfD notice on ] acceptable? ] 07:34, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
May I ask why you say that ] is ]? You seem certain. -] 07:59, August 26, 2005 (UTC) | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 03:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:10, 20 January 2025
Archives |
---|
|
Please don't leave
Please don't leave, Zoe. I'm very saddened by what happened in the last few days, but it can blow over. We've never edited the same articles, and would probably disagree on a lot, but I've always seen you as someone who cared a lot about Misplaced Pages and who was good for the project. I am quite sure that Jimbo would not want his hasty words to lead to any permanent hurt, and it's quite obvious from looking at his contributions that he was preoccupied with real life matters for a few days after his phonecall with Mr Pierce, which would explain why no notification of that phonecall was given to the community. It's also clear that his post on WP:AN/I was written hastily, as he had been away from Misplaced Pages for a few days before, and didn't post anything immediately after, so it's very likely that he forced himself to find time to make a post in order to close the matter immediately, but didn't take the time word it in such a way as to take into account that you were trying to protect Misplaced Pages and that you didn't know it had been resolved. His own words on his talk page two days later indicate that he did not have any wish to hurt you. Please, Zoe, don't let this lead to a permanent break with Misplaced Pages. You are highly valued here. Musical Linguist 17:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Desysopped
In case you return, someone just used your account (among others) saying it had been hacked. It's been emergency desysopped. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- In case you just randomly read this page: I miss you. - brenneman 23:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- From that old discussion, I don't see why anyone had to make such a big fuss about it. Thankfully, they're both in better places now. PotentialDanger (talk) 21:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nandor (Middle-earth)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nandor (Middle-earth), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Otto Fruhner
Zoe,
You once deleted Otto Fruhner because a vandal had posted nonsense. As a matter of politesse, I am informing you that I am re-establishing it as a legitimate biographical article of a World War I flyer.
Georgejdorner (talk) 09:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:H59543.png
File:H59543.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:USS Monitor-H59543.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Misplaced Pages, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Misplaced Pages, in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Devoucoux
An article that you have been involved in editing, Devoucoux, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Devoucoux (2nd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unionsoap (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I linked it to Sare in the Basque contrie and horse tackel. The AfD result was a ' Keep ' result.Wipsenade (talk) 09:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Minnesota Meetup
2009Proposed date: Saturday, October 10.
Details under discussion.
Please share this with anyone who may be interested.
Delivered by Jonathunder (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Zoe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 21 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Charles Wadsworth - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL (I'm trying to exspand it)--Wipsenade (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ivan Davis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Marsha Mason - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Robert E. Connick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
November 9, 1985 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect November 9, 1985. Since you had some involvement with the November 9, 1985 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mistakefinder (talk) 19:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Lists of cemeteries by country
I have nominated Lists of cemeteries by country, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lists of cemeteries by country. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
The AfD result was a- 'Keep' result!--Wipsenade (talk) 02:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:NurembergTrials.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:NurembergTrials.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon/Blastoise listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Blastoise. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Blastoise redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon/Bulbasaur listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Bulbasaur. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Bulbasaur redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Mewtwo. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Mewtwo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Mewtwo. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Mewtwo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC).
Awards
During your 5 years hear, you made enough edits to become a Labutnum grade editor.Wipsenade (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
This editor is a Labutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, Chewed Broken Pencil, and Sticky Note. |
Well it was more than five years, but at any rate, due to the recent Service award reforms, your level was actually these:
This editor is a Labutnum of the Encyclopedia and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, Chewed Broken Pencil, Sticky Note, Bookmark, and Note from Jimbo. |
This editor is a Senior Editor III and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star. |
It says that this account was compromised... if you have a new account, you may of course count the start time and edits of this (old) account in determining your service award level for the new account.
At any rate, thank you for your long service and many contributions to the Misplaced Pages. Herostratus (talk) 21:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Cinhil Haldane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cinhil Haldane is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cinhil Haldane until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Muscat) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Muscat, Zoe!
Misplaced Pages editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Reviewed, well done!
To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
SamHolt6 (talk) 02:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Baguio (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baguio (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Baguio (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sanglahi86 (talk) 08:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Torenth (fictional) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Torenth (fictional) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Torenth (fictional) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 18:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Javan Haldane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Javan Haldane is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Javan Haldane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Maia (Middle-earth)
The article Maia (Middle-earth) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fictional being/race. No indication of passing WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Aulë
The article Aulë has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this fictional character passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nandor (Middle-earth)
The article Nandor (Middle-earth) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence this fictional group of characters passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Nandor (Middle-earth) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nandor (Middle-earth) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nandor (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Aulë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aulë is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aulë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ulmo
The article Ulmo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to Vala_(Middle-earth)#Ulmo
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Manwë
The article Manwë has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to Vala_(Middle-earth)#Manwë
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Edain
The article Edain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this fictional race passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Edain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edain is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Edain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Celeborn
The article Celeborn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nienna
The article Nienna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Yavanna
The article Yavanna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Varda
The article Varda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Manwë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manwë is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Manwë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Ulmo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ulmo is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ulmo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ossë
The article Ossë has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Celeborn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celeborn is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Celeborn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Varda for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varda is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Varda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Ossë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ossë is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ossë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
"Octagon, disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Octagon, disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Octagon, disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Aman (Tolkien) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aman (Tolkien) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aman (Tolkien) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Calaquendi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Calaquendi is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Calaquendi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Carl XVI Gustaf
A tag has been placed on Talk:Carl XVI Gustaf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
I don't think this page is needed.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Interstellarity (talk) 02:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of The Miracle Worker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Miracle Worker is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Miracle Worker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Dan from A.P. (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
"BokmaalAndNynorsk" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect BokmaalAndNynorsk has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 1 § BokmaalAndNynorsk until a consensus is reached. 〜 Festucalex • talk 06:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Robert Stroud
Robert Stroud has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Norfolk, Virginia
Norfolk, Virginia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Portland Trail Blazers
Portland Trail Blazers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wings (1927 film)
Wings (1927 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)