Misplaced Pages

Classical language: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:39, 13 June 2008 editThirusivaperur (talk | contribs)343 edits KNM, stop reverting without any reason← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:19, 8 December 2024 edit undoTamfang (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers57,090 edits Middle Ages: unpipe 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Old language with established literature or use}}
A '''classical language''', is a language with a ] that is "classical"&mdash;ie, "it should be ancient, it should be an independent tradition that arose mostly on its own, not as an offshoot of another tradition, and it must have a large and extremely rich body of ancient literature."<ref>http://tamil.berkeley.edu/Tamil%20Chair/TamilClassicalLanguage/TamilClassicalLgeLtr.html : According to ] linguist ], " qualify as a classical tradition, a language must fit several criteria: it should be ancient, it should be an independent tradition that arose mostly on its own not as an offshoot of another tradition, and it must have a large and extremely rich body of ancient literature."</ref> (] of ])
{{For|classical languages in India|Classical languages of India}}{{Short lead|date=September 2024}}
According to the definition by ], a '''classical language''' is any ] with an independent literary tradition and a large body of ancient written ].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Hart|first1=George|title=Statement on the status of Tamil as a Classical Language|url=https://southasia.berkeley.edu/statement-status-tamil-classical-language|publisher=Institute for South Asia Studies, UC Berkeley|access-date=18 October 2021}}</ref>


Classical languages are usually ]. Those that are still in use today tend to show highly diglossic characteristics in areas where they are used, as the difference between spoken and written language has widened over time.
In another sense of the word, an important criterion is that a language should have a broad influence over an extended period of time, even after it is no longer a colloquial mother tongue in its original form. If one language uses roots from another language to coin words (in the way that many ] use Greek and Latin roots to devise new words such as "telephone" etc.), this is an indication that the second language is a classical language. Also, the writing system of such a classical languages will often have spread to be used by other languages.


== Classical studies ==
Thus classical languages tend to be either ]s, or show a high degree of ], as the spoken varieties of the language diverge further and further away from the classical written language over centuries.
{{Main|Classics}}
In the context of traditional European ], the "classical languages" refer to ] and ], which were the literary languages of the Mediterranean world in ].


Greek was the language of ] and of ], ] and ] historians, playwrights, and philosophers. It has contributed many words to the vocabulary of English and many other European languages, and has been a standard subject of study in Western educational institutions since ]. ] forms of Ancient Greek roots are used in many of the scientific names of species and in other scientific terminology. ], which served as a ] in the Eastern Roman Empire, remains in use today as a sacred language in some ].
Note that the judgment as to whether a language is "classical" is made on the basis of external factors, and not the nature of the language itself.


Latin became the lingua franca of the early ] and later of the ]. Despite the decline of the Western Roman Empire, the Latin language continued to flourish in the very different social and economic environment of ], not least because it became the official language of the ]. In Western and Central Europe and in parts of northern Africa, Latin retained its elevated status as the main vehicle of communication for the learned classes throughout the Middle Ages and subsequently; witness especially the Renaissance and Baroque periods. This language was not supplanted for scientific purposes until the 18th century, and for formal descriptions in ] as well as ] it survived to the later 20th century. The modern international ] holds to this day: taxonomists assign a Latin or Latinized name as the scientific name of each ].
==Classical studies==
In a most restricted meaning, in the inherently ] context of ], "the Classical Languages" are the ] and ] literary languages of ], foundational to ].


== Outside of western civilization ==
In terms of worldwide cultural importance, ] in '''' (1921) would extend the list by ], ] and ]:
<blockquote>
"When we realize that an educated Japanese can hardly frame a single literary sentence without the use of Chinese resources, that to this day Siamese and Burmese and Cambodgian bear the unmistakable imprint of the Sanskrit and Pali that came in with Hindu Buddhism centuries ago, or that whether we argue for or against the teaching of Latin and Greek our arguments are sure to be studded with words that have come to us from Rome and Athens, we get some indication of what early Chinese culture, Buddhism, and classical mediterranean civilization have meant in the world's history. There are just five languages that have had overwhelming significance as carriers of culture. These are classical Chinese, Sanskrit, Arabic, Greek, and Latin. In comparison with these, even such culturally important languages such as Hebrew and French sink into a secondary position."
</blockquote>


In terms of worldwide cultural importance, ] in his 1921 book ''Language'' extends the list to include ], ], and ]:
==General usage==
The following languages are generally taken to have a "classical" stage. Such a stage is limitited in time, and is considered "classical" if it comes to be regarded as a literary "golden age" retrospectively. Thus, ] is the language of 5th to 4th century BC ], and as such only a small subset of the varieties of the ] as a whole. A "classical" period usually corresponds to a flowering of literature following an "archaic" period, such as Classical Latin succeeding ], Classical Sumerian succeeding Archaic Sumerian, Classical Sanskrit succeding ], Classical Persian succeeding ]. This is a partly a matter of terminology, and for example ] is taken to include rather than precede Classical Chinese. In some cases, such as those of Arabic and Tamil, the "classical" stage corresponds to the earliest attested literary variant.


<blockquote>When we realize that an educated ] can hardly frame a single literary sentence without the use of Chinese resources, that to this day ] and ] and ] bear the unmistakable imprint of the Sanskrit and ] that came in with Hindu Buddhism centuries ago, or that whether we argue for or against the teaching of Latin and Greek our argument is sure to be studded with words that have come to us from ] and ], we get some indication of what early Chinese culture and ], and classical ] have meant in the world's history. There are just five languages that have had an overwhelming significance as carriers of culture. They are classical Chinese, Sanskrit, Arabic, Greek, and Latin. In comparison with these, even such culturally important languages as ] and ] sink into a secondary position.<ref>{{cite book | last =Sapir| first=Edward| author-link =Edward Sapir | title =Language: An introduction to the study of speech | publisher =Harcourt, Brace and Company| date =1921| location =New York| page =164| url=https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12629| isbn =4-87187-529-6| access-date=February 17, 2006}}</ref></blockquote>
* ] (literary language of ], ca. 26th to 23rd c. BC)
* ] (literary language of ] from ca. the 20th century BC to the 4th century AD)
* ] (the language of the ], in particular of the ] of ca. the 7th and 6th c. BC)
* ] (based on the literary language of the ] from ca. the 5th c. BC)
* ] (] of the 5th c. BC)
* ] (the language of ]<ref>Historian Kamil Zvelebil among others has stressed that the use of 'Sangam literature' to describe this corpus of literature is a misnomer and ''Classical'' literature should be used instead; Kamil Zvelebil, ''The Smile of Murugan''.</ref>, 3rd c. BC to 3rd c. AD)<ref>http://www.ciil-classicaltamil.org/project1.html</ref>


In this sense, a classical language is a language that has a broad influence over an extended period of time, even after it is no longer a ] ] in its original form. If one language uses roots from another language to coin words (in the way that many ] use Greek and Latin ] to devise new words such as "telephone", etc.), this is an indication that the second language is a classical language.{{citation needed|date=April 2023}}
* ] (literary language of the 1st c. BC)
* ] (literary ] of ], 1st c. AD)
<!-- Classical Tamil is placed after Classical Sanskrit in this page by consensus developed on the talk page. Please discuss your sources on the talk page prior to reversing the order -->
* ] (literary ] of the ], 3rd to 5th c.)
* ] (oldest attested form of ] from the 5th c. and literary language until the 18th c.)
* ] (court language of the ], 3rd to 7th c.)
* ] (the language of the mature ], 3rd to 9th c.)
* ] (], not before 5th c.)
* ] (based the language of the ], 7th c.)
* ] (language of the ], 9th to 10th c.)
* ] (language of ] literature, 10th to 12th c.)
* ] (the language of the ], 13th c.)
* ] (language of the 13th to 18th c. ] literature)
* ] (lingua franca of the 16th c. ])
* ] (lingua franca of 16th c. central ])
* ] (language of 16th c. ])
* ] (language of 16th -18th c. ])
* ] (language of poetry and administration of the ], 16th to 19th c.)


In comparison, ]s with a large sphere of influence are known as ]s.
==Notes ==

{{reflist}}
== General usage ==
{{Original research|date=November 2022}}
The following languages are generally taken to have a "classical" stage. Such a stage is limited in time and is considered "classical" if it comes to be regarded as a literary "golden age" retrospectively.{{citation needed|date=February 2019}} Thus, ] is the language of 5th to 4th century BC ] and, as such, only a small subset of the varieties of the ] as a whole. A "classical" period usually corresponds to a flowering of literature following an "archaic" period, such as ] succeeding ], ] succeeding Archaic Sumerian, Classical Sanskrit succeeding ], ] succeeding ]. This is partly a matter of terminology, and for example ] is taken to include rather than precede ]. In some cases, such as those of ] and ], the "classical" stage corresponds to the earliest attested literary variant.<ref>{{Citation| last=Ramanujan|first= A. K.|author-link = A. K. Ramanujan|title=Poems of Love and War: From the Eight Anthologies and the Ten Long Poems of Classical Tamil|publisher= New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 329|year = 1985|isbn=0-231-05107-7|url =https://books.google.com/books?id=nIybE0HRvdQC}}Quote (p.ix–x) "Tamil, one of the four classical languages of India, is a Dravidian language ... These poems ('']'', 1st century BC to 3rd century AD) are 'classical,' i.e. early, ancient; they are also 'classics,' i.e. works that have stood the test of time, the founding works of a whole tradition. Not to know them is not to know a unique and major poetic achievement of Indian civilization."</ref>

===Antiquity===
* ] (literary language of ], c. 26th to 23rd centuries BC) ]s were used in ] even for non-Sumerian texts until the writing system went out of use around the ] AD
* ] (literary language of ] from c. the 20th century BC to the 4th century AD)
* ] (the Akkadian language from c. 20th to 16th centuries BC, the imitated standard for later literary works)
* ] (the Akkadian language from c. 16th to 13th centuries BC)
* ] (the form of Sanskrit before Classical standardization was used in Vedic texts from c. 15th to 5th centuries BC)
* ] (the language of the ], in particular of the ] of c. the 7th and 6th centuries BC)
* ] (court language of the ], 6th to 4th centuries BC)
* ] (based on the literary language, ], used in the capital ] of the ] from c. the 5th century BC)
* ] (] of the 5th century BC)
* ] (described by ] ] of the 4th century BC)<ref></ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HR-_LK5kl18C&pg=PA21 |title= The Sanskrit epics, Part 2| volume = 12|first= J. L. |last= Brockington|page = 28|publisher = BRILL| year=1998|isbn=978-90-04-10260-6}}</ref>
* ] (the earliest known form of the ] was the official language of the Satavahana dynasty c. 3rd century BC to 3rd century AD)
* ] (] c. 3rd century BC to 3rd century AD, defined by ])<ref>{{Citation|last=Zvelebil|first=Kamil|year = 1997|title=The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India: On Tamil Literature of South India|publisher=BRILL Academic Publishers. p. 378|isbn=90-04-03591-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VF2VMUoY_okC&q=smile+of+murugan}} Quote: "Chart 1 literature: 1. the "Urtext" of the ''Tolkappiyam'', i.e. the first two sections, ''Eluttatikaram'' and ''Collatikaram'' minus later interpolations, '''ca. 100 BC''' 2. the earliest strata of bardic poetry in the so-called ''Cankam'' anthologies, '''ca. 1 Cent. BC–2 Cent. AD.'''"</ref>
* ] (Buddhist Canon used this language from 2nd centuries BC)
* ] (literary language of the 1st century BC)
* ] (literary ] of ], 1st century AD)
* ] (literary ] of ], 3rd to 5th centuries)
* ] (court language of the ], 3rd to 7th centuries)
* ] (language of Egypt and the ], 3rd to 13th centuries, liturgical language to the present day)

===Middle Ages===
* ], language of the ]; the Garima Gospels are dated from the 5th century to the 10th century by various scholars.
* ], the oldest attested form of ] from the 5th century and literary language until the 18th century
* ], based on the language of the ], 7th century to present; liturgical language of ]
* ], court language of ]; earliest available literary work is the '']'' of AD 850.<ref name=BritannicaLit>''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 2008. "Kannada literature" Quote: "''The earliest literary work is the ''Kavirājamārga'' (c. AD 850), a treatise on poetics based on a Sanskrit model.''"</ref>
* ], language of Saxon Christian literature, 9th to 12th centuries
* ], language of '']'' and the '']'' with many divergent written dialects, but partially standardized in ] form
* ], language of chivalric romance, 8th to 14th centuries
* ], language of Georgia, 5th to 11th centuries
* ], language of the ], 9th to 13th centuries
* ], language of classical ], 9th to present
* ], language of ], 9th or 10th to 15th centuries
* ], language of ] literature, used primarily during ] Javanese kingdom era from 10th to 15th centuries<ref name="H.Cresse">{{cite journal |last1=Cresse |first1=Helen |title=Old Javanese Studies: A Review of the Field |journal=Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde |date=2001 |volume=1 |issue=157 |pages=3–33 |doi=10.1163/22134379-90003816 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43472268 |access-date=23 February 2020|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Ogloblin">{{cite book |last=Ogloblin |first=Alexander K. |year=2005 |chapter=Javanese |title=The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BAShwSYLbUYC&pg=PA590 |editor1=K. Alexander Adelaar |editor2=Nikolaus Himmelmann |location=London dan New York |publisher=Routledge |pages=590–624 |isbn=9780700712861 }}</ref>
* ], language of the ] during its Golden Age, 10th century earliest manuscript is ]
* ], the earliest forms of the ], emerged during the ], 10th to 11th centuries.
* ], religious and literary language of Tibet, 10th century to present
* ], 10th century CE<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-08-31 |title=Assamese language {{!}} Assamese Dialects, Brahmaputra Valley & Eastern India {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Assamese-language |access-date=2024-10-03 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en |quote=Assamese literary tradition dates to the 13th century. Prose texts, notably buranjis (historical works), began to appear in the 16th century.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |date=2024-08-31 |title=Charyapads as the Oldest Written Specimen of Assamese Literature|url=https://www.neliti.com/publications/429892/charyapads-as-the-oldest-written-specimen-of-assamese-literature#:~:text=While%20dividing%20this%20era%2C%20Charyapad,written%20specimen%20of%20Assamese%20literature.|journal=International Journal of Health Sciences|doi=10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.6513 |language=en |quote=Charyapads are considered as the first written specimen of Assamese literature. |last1=Deka |first1=Joy Jyoti |last2=Boro |first2=Akashi Tara |pages=7028–7034 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
* ], language of ] literature, 10th to 12th centuries
* ], language of ] and ], 10th to 16th centuries
* ], language of the ]s, 11th to 14th centuries
* ], language of ], 11th to 14th centuries
* ], language of ] before its conquest by the ], 11th to 14th centuries
* ]: the earliest available literary work is the Telugu Mahabharata, AD 1067.
* ]: the earliest extant prose work is the ''Ramacharitam'', 12th century.<ref name="charitam">K. Ramachandran Nair in Ayyappapanicker (1997), p.301</ref>
* ], language of ], 12th to 18th centuries
* ], language of the ], from the 12th century
* ], language of the ], 12th to 15th centuries
* ], language of the ], 12th to 17th centuries
* ], Turkic language spoken in Qocho from the 9th–14th centuries and in Gansu
* ], the language of the ], 13th century
* ], language of literature in the ], 13th to 14th centuries
* ], language of the ], 13th to 16th centuries
* ], one language of the ], 13th to 16th centuries
* ], 11th to 15th centuries
* ], language of ], 13th to 16th centuries
* ], language of the 13th to 18th centuries Scottish and Irish Gaelic literature
* ], language of the ], 13th to 19th centuries
* ], language of ], 14th to 15th centuries, with many divergent written dialects, but partially standardized on London speech
* ], language of the ], 14th to 17th centuries
* ], language of ], 14th to 15th centuries
* ], lingua franca of the ], 14th to 16th centuries
* ], language of the ], the ], and the ], 14th to 17th centuries
* ], language of ], 14th to 18th centuries
* ], classical Turkic language of Central Asia and the Volga, 14th to early 20th centuries
* ], language of the ], from 14th century
* ], poetic language of ] and the Northern/Central Indian subcontinent, 13th-18th century, became standardized as ] in the 19th century.

===Amerindian languages===
* ] (the language of the mature ], 3rd to 9th centuries)
* ] (lingua franca of 16th-century central Mexico)
* ] (lingua franca of the 16th-century ])
* ] (a ] of 16th-century ])
* ] (language of 16th to 18th centuries ])

===Early modern period===
{{verify|section|date=March 2023}}
* ] (one of two major literary traditions of Northern India during Mughal rule led to its use by poets, 14th to 18th centuries)
* ] (the second of two major literary traditions in early modern Northern India used by poets, 15th-19th centuries)
* ] (language of the ], 15th to 16th centuries)
* ] (language of ], 15th to 16th centuries)
* ] (language of the ], 15th to 17th centuries)
* ] (lingua franca of the Caucasus Mountain region and language of Azeri literature, 15th to 18th centuries)
* ] (the other language of the ], 16th to 17th centuries)
* ] (language of the ], the '']'', and ], 16th to 17th centuries)
* ] (language of the ], 16th to 18th centuries)
* ] (language of poetry and administration of the ], 16th to 19th centuries)
* ] (language of the Manchus who ruled China, 16th–20th centuries)
* ] (language of the ], 17th century)
* ] (language of ] under ] to ], 17th to 18th centuries)
* ] (language of ], 17th to 19th centuries)
* ] (language of the ], 18th to 19th centuries)
* ] (the language of Mongolian literature and translations of Tibetan Buddhist religious texts from 1700–1900)
* ] (the modern language Bengali from 1820s to 1940s)
* ] (language of the ], 19th–20th centuries)
* ] (language of Malla kingdom and lingua franca in India-Tibet trade)


== See also == == See also ==
{{Library resources box |by=no |onlinebooks=yes |others=yes |about=yes |label=Classical language
*]
|viaf= |lccn= |lcheading= |wikititle= }}
*]
*], an aspect of the influence of a classical language on a later language
*]
*] *]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*] *]
*] *]
Line 55: Line 140:
*] *]
*] *]
*]
*]


==References== == References ==
{{reflist}}
*{{citation |last=Flood |first=Gavin |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=An Introduction to Hinduism |year=1996 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location= |isbn= 0-521-43878-0}}


*{{citation |last=Flood |first=Gavin |title=An Introduction to Hinduism |year=1996 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-521-43878-0 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontohi0000floo }}
]
* {{cite book |title=A study on Kāmrūpī: a dialect of Assamese |last=Goswami |first=Upendra Nath |year=1970 |publisher=Dept. of Historical Antiquarian Studies, Assam}}
*{{cite book |last=Nair|first=K. Ramachandran|editor=Ayyappapanicker|title=Medieval Indian Literature:An Anthology |year= 1997|publisher=Sahitya Akademi|isbn=81-260-0365-0|chapter= Malayalam}}
* {{cite thesis |type=Ph.D. |first=Mathew W S |last=Toulmin |title=Reconstructing linguistic history in a dialect continuum: The Kamta, Rajbanshi, and Northern Deshi Bangla subgroup of Indo-Aryan |url=https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/45743 |publisher=The Australian National University |year=2006}}


==Further reading==
]
*Ashdowne, Richard. 2009. "Accidence and Acronyms: Deploying electronic assessment in support of classical language teaching in a university context." ''Arts and Humanities in Higher Education'' 8, no. 2: 201–16.
]
*Beach, Adam R. 2001. "The creation of a classical language in the eighteenth century: standardizing English, cultural imperialism, and the future of the literary canon." ''Texas Studies in Literature and Language'' 43, no. 2: 117+.
]
*Coulson, Michael. 1976. ''Sanskrit: An Introduction to the Classical Language.'' Sevenoaks, Kent: Hodder and Stoughton.
]
*Crooker, Jill M., and Kathleen A. Rabiteau. 2000. "An interwoven fabric: The AP latin examinations, the SAT II: Latin test, and the national "standards for classical language learning." ''The Classical Outlook'' 77, no. 4: 148–53.
]
*Denizot, Camille, and Olga Spevak. 2017. ''Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek.'' Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
]
*Eschbach-Szabo, Viktoria, and Shelley Ching-yu Hsieh. 2005. "Chinese as a classical language of botanical science: Semiotics of transcription." ''Kodikas/Code. Ars Semeiotica: An International Journal of Semiotics'' 28, nos. 3–4: 317–43.
]
*Gruber-Miller, John. 2006. ''When Dead Tongues Speak: Teaching Beginning Greek and Latin.'' Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]
*Hymes, Robert. 2006. "Getting the Words Right: Speech, Vernacular Language, and Classical Language in Song Neo-Confucian 'Records of Words'." ''Journal of Song-Yuan Studies'' 36: 25–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23496297.
]
*Koutropoulos, Apostolos. 2011. "Modernizing classical language education: communicative language teaching & educational technology integration in classical Greek." ''Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge'' 9, no. 3 (2011): 55–69.
]
*Tieken, Herman. 2010. "Blaming the Brahmins: Texts lost and found in Tamil literary history." ''Studies in History'' 26, no. 2: 227–43.
*Watt, Jonathan M. 2003. "Classical language instruction: A window to cultural diversity." ''International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities, and Nations'' 3: 115–24.
*Whitney, William Dwight. 1971. ''Sanskrit Grammar: Including Both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brahmana.'' 12th issue of the 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

==External links==
*{{Commonscatinline|Classical languages}}

{{Authority control}}

]

Latest revision as of 05:19, 8 December 2024

Old language with established literature or use For classical languages in India, see Classical languages of India.
This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (September 2024)

According to the definition by George L. Hart, a classical language is any language with an independent literary tradition and a large body of ancient written literature.

Classical languages are usually extinct languages. Those that are still in use today tend to show highly diglossic characteristics in areas where they are used, as the difference between spoken and written language has widened over time.

Classical studies

Main article: Classics

In the context of traditional European classical studies, the "classical languages" refer to Greek and Latin, which were the literary languages of the Mediterranean world in classical antiquity.

Greek was the language of Homer and of classical Athenian, Hellenistic and Byzantine historians, playwrights, and philosophers. It has contributed many words to the vocabulary of English and many other European languages, and has been a standard subject of study in Western educational institutions since the Renaissance. Latinized forms of Ancient Greek roots are used in many of the scientific names of species and in other scientific terminology. Koine Greek, which served as a lingua franca in the Eastern Roman Empire, remains in use today as a sacred language in some Eastern Orthodox churches.

Latin became the lingua franca of the early Roman Empire and later of the Western Roman Empire. Despite the decline of the Western Roman Empire, the Latin language continued to flourish in the very different social and economic environment of the Middle Ages, not least because it became the official language of the Roman Catholic Church. In Western and Central Europe and in parts of northern Africa, Latin retained its elevated status as the main vehicle of communication for the learned classes throughout the Middle Ages and subsequently; witness especially the Renaissance and Baroque periods. This language was not supplanted for scientific purposes until the 18th century, and for formal descriptions in zoology as well as botany it survived to the later 20th century. The modern international binomial nomenclature holds to this day: taxonomists assign a Latin or Latinized name as the scientific name of each species.

Outside of western civilization

In terms of worldwide cultural importance, Edward Sapir in his 1921 book Language extends the list to include classical Chinese, Arabic, and Sanskrit:

When we realize that an educated Japanese can hardly frame a single literary sentence without the use of Chinese resources, that to this day Siamese and Burmese and Cambodgian bear the unmistakable imprint of the Sanskrit and Pali that came in with Hindu Buddhism centuries ago, or that whether we argue for or against the teaching of Latin and Greek our argument is sure to be studded with words that have come to us from Rome and Athens, we get some indication of what early Chinese culture and Buddhism, and classical Mediterranean civilization have meant in the world's history. There are just five languages that have had an overwhelming significance as carriers of culture. They are classical Chinese, Sanskrit, Arabic, Greek, and Latin. In comparison with these, even such culturally important languages as Hebrew and French sink into a secondary position.

In this sense, a classical language is a language that has a broad influence over an extended period of time, even after it is no longer a colloquial mother tongue in its original form. If one language uses roots from another language to coin words (in the way that many European languages use Greek and Latin roots to devise new words such as "telephone", etc.), this is an indication that the second language is a classical language.

In comparison, living languages with a large sphere of influence are known as world languages.

General usage

This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (November 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The following languages are generally taken to have a "classical" stage. Such a stage is limited in time and is considered "classical" if it comes to be regarded as a literary "golden age" retrospectively. Thus, Classical Greek is the language of 5th to 4th century BC Athens and, as such, only a small subset of the varieties of the Greek language as a whole. A "classical" period usually corresponds to a flowering of literature following an "archaic" period, such as Classical Latin succeeding Old Latin, Classical Sumerian succeeding Archaic Sumerian, Classical Sanskrit succeeding Vedic Sanskrit, Classical Persian succeeding Old Persian. This is partly a matter of terminology, and for example Old Chinese is taken to include rather than precede Classical Chinese. In some cases, such as those of Persian and Tamil, the "classical" stage corresponds to the earliest attested literary variant.

Antiquity

Middle Ages

Amerindian languages

Early modern period

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Classical language" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

See also

Library resources about
Classical language

References

  1. Hart, George. "Statement on the status of Tamil as a Classical Language". Institute for South Asia Studies, UC Berkeley. Retrieved 18 October 2021.
  2. Sapir, Edward (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company. p. 164. ISBN 4-87187-529-6. Retrieved February 17, 2006.
  3. Ramanujan, A. K. (1985), Poems of Love and War: From the Eight Anthologies and the Ten Long Poems of Classical Tamil, New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 329, ISBN 0-231-05107-7Quote (p.ix–x) "Tamil, one of the four classical languages of India, is a Dravidian language ... These poems (Sangam literature, 1st century BC to 3rd century AD) are 'classical,' i.e. early, ancient; they are also 'classics,' i.e. works that have stood the test of time, the founding works of a whole tradition. Not to know them is not to know a unique and major poetic achievement of Indian civilization."
  4. Article "Panini" from The Columbia Encyclopedia (Sixth Edition) at Encyclopedia.com
  5. Brockington, J. L. (1998). The Sanskrit epics, Part 2. Vol. 12. BRILL. p. 28. ISBN 978-90-04-10260-6.
  6. Zvelebil, Kamil (1997), The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India: On Tamil Literature of South India, BRILL Academic Publishers. p. 378, ISBN 90-04-03591-5 Quote: "Chart 1 literature: 1. the "Urtext" of the Tolkappiyam, i.e. the first two sections, Eluttatikaram and Collatikaram minus later interpolations, ca. 100 BC 2. the earliest strata of bardic poetry in the so-called Cankam anthologies, ca. 1 Cent. BC–2 Cent. AD."
  7. Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008. "Kannada literature" Quote: "The earliest literary work is the Kavirājamārga (c. AD 850), a treatise on poetics based on a Sanskrit model."
  8. Cresse, Helen (2001). "Old Javanese Studies: A Review of the Field". Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde. 1 (157): 3–33. doi:10.1163/22134379-90003816. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  9. Ogloblin, Alexander K. (2005). "Javanese". In K. Alexander Adelaar; Nikolaus Himmelmann (eds.). The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London dan New York: Routledge. pp. 590–624. ISBN 9780700712861.
  10. "Assamese language | Assamese Dialects, Brahmaputra Valley & Eastern India | Britannica". www.britannica.com. 2024-08-31. Retrieved 2024-10-03. Assamese literary tradition dates to the 13th century. Prose texts, notably buranjis (historical works), began to appear in the 16th century.
  11. Deka, Joy Jyoti; Boro, Akashi Tara (2024-08-31). "Charyapads as the Oldest Written Specimen of Assamese Literature". International Journal of Health Sciences: 7028–7034. doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.6513. Charyapads are considered as the first written specimen of Assamese literature.
  12. K. Ramachandran Nair in Ayyappapanicker (1997), p.301

Further reading

  • Ashdowne, Richard. 2009. "Accidence and Acronyms: Deploying electronic assessment in support of classical language teaching in a university context." Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 8, no. 2: 201–16.
  • Beach, Adam R. 2001. "The creation of a classical language in the eighteenth century: standardizing English, cultural imperialism, and the future of the literary canon." Texas Studies in Literature and Language 43, no. 2: 117+.
  • Coulson, Michael. 1976. Sanskrit: An Introduction to the Classical Language. Sevenoaks, Kent: Hodder and Stoughton.
  • Crooker, Jill M., and Kathleen A. Rabiteau. 2000. "An interwoven fabric: The AP latin examinations, the SAT II: Latin test, and the national "standards for classical language learning." The Classical Outlook 77, no. 4: 148–53.
  • Denizot, Camille, and Olga Spevak. 2017. Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Eschbach-Szabo, Viktoria, and Shelley Ching-yu Hsieh. 2005. "Chinese as a classical language of botanical science: Semiotics of transcription." Kodikas/Code. Ars Semeiotica: An International Journal of Semiotics 28, nos. 3–4: 317–43.
  • Gruber-Miller, John. 2006. When Dead Tongues Speak: Teaching Beginning Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hymes, Robert. 2006. "Getting the Words Right: Speech, Vernacular Language, and Classical Language in Song Neo-Confucian 'Records of Words'." Journal of Song-Yuan Studies 36: 25–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23496297.
  • Koutropoulos, Apostolos. 2011. "Modernizing classical language education: communicative language teaching & educational technology integration in classical Greek." Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 9, no. 3 (2011): 55–69.
  • Tieken, Herman. 2010. "Blaming the Brahmins: Texts lost and found in Tamil literary history." Studies in History 26, no. 2: 227–43.
  • Watt, Jonathan M. 2003. "Classical language instruction: A window to cultural diversity." International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities, and Nations 3: 115–24.
  • Whitney, William Dwight. 1971. Sanskrit Grammar: Including Both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brahmana. 12th issue of the 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

External links

Category: