| Revision as of 04:48, 24 June 2008 editSephiroth BCR (talk | contribs)25,432 editsm →Thoughts from your coach: fix← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:52, 26 December 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,979 edits High-level radioactive waste management listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:Gary/header}} | |||
| {{Usertalkback|you=other|me=watched|icon=lang}} | |||
| {{archive box|search=yes|root=User talk:Gary/Archives|<center> | |||
| {{archive box|<center>] · ] · ] · ] · ]</center>}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| {{AutoArchivingNotice|age=1|dounreplied=yes|small=yes}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]<br> | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]<br> | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]<br> | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]<br> | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ]{{·}} | |||
| ] | |||
| </center>}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |counter = 5 | |||
| |algo = old(1d) | |algo = old(1d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Gary |
|archive = User talk:Gary/Archives/%(year)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{clear}} | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| == Hi there! == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I seemed to have addressed all your comments on ]. I has already been ten days since its nomination, and if you provide your support or objection, the FLC directors may be able to provide a consensus on what is to be made of the article. Thank you. ''']'''<sub>]</sub> 05:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| : I have capped my comments. ] <font size="-1">(])</font> 06:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| == ]/] == | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Congratulations ] has been selected as a July ]. It will appear in the ] template for one day as an LOTD. If you have any preference on a days during July let me know before June 24th. If you have any other lists that you feel should be nominated next month please ad them at ].--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 20:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| How does it look now (obviously the article - not the FLC) Thanks, '''«''' ] ] 00:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == FAC note == | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| Gary, when articles have faulty footnote placement (]) as well as ] issues, you might want to refer the nominators to ]. His script fixes both of those items ... preferable to having nominators do that tedious and irritating work. Regards, ] (]) 18:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| Greetings. You are receiving this note as you are a member of this WikiProject. Currently there is not much of activity in the project and I am hoping to revive the project with your help. I have made a few changes to the project page . You are welcome to make suggestions of improvement / changes in the design. I have also make a proposal to AutoTagg articles with {{tl|WikiProject Computing}} for the descendant wikiprojects articles also. Please express your opinion ] -- ] <sup> ] </sup> - 12:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| == Thoughts from your coach == | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| As I probably need two of my current four FLCs to run through before going on another article writing spree (damn I haven't done that in a while), I'll leave some comments as your admin coach. For the purposes of discussion, I'll separate this into sections. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| #'''Time''' - we're nearing the three month mark since your previous RfA, which is sufficient in the grand majority of cases to deflect the "OMG, power hunger" !votes that often appear for users that jump the gun too soon after their previous RfA. If you want, you certainly can wait longer to discount such opposes completely, but three months is generally the unofficial time between RfAs that is generally acceptable. | |||
| #'''Civility''' - if anything, you've gotten much better in this regard, as I can see by going down your archive (split that thing, it's absolutely enormous, if convienient). Your commentary at FAC/FLC/FTC is always civil and constructive, as is your conduct elsewhere. | |||
| #'''Administrative areas''' - the big caveat this time around is that you don't really need a strong participation per se in order to succeed per a nice example: ]. The big clincher in this case is your answer to question one, where you can note that you want to use the tools during your article writing process, for any problems at FAC/FLC/FTC nominations, and for template/coding stuff (since you said previously that you wanted to be involved in that and commented as such). That said, your partipation at ] and ] has been good (nice job on taking up some clerking as I suggested), and you've been going crazy with Huggle (your reports/reverts look pretty solid though, so it's a plus). | |||
| #'''Content contributions''' - well, I guess I should start more writing, or I'm going to be unseated at ] sometime in the future :p (you've already tied me at ]) But in all seriousness, your article writing is beyond reproach, and you're solid in this aspect for a future RfA. | |||
| #'''Comments from previous RfA''' - the big concern everyone has was with Pedro's concerns that you didn't heed criticism well with the category tagging thing, and I think I can safely say that you've certainly changed well in this regard. The other one was that you were simply going too fast with your edits and without care. You still go fast, but your edits are thought-out much better. Heck, fast is probably good, considering that the fast stuff is FAC/FLC/FTC commentary or Huggle edits. | |||
| ] | |||
| As soon as the three month mark goes by (July 11), feel free to ask me to nominate you again, but my main reason for bringing this up (other than keep up the good work) is to ask other users to evaluate you (possibly open another editor review), especially the users that opposed your previous RfA. Again, all this is up to you, but I stand by my comments a while ago that having the tools is always a net plus for any good editor. Cheers, <font face="Verdana">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></font> 04:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744489 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:52, 26 December 2024
 Article contributions (210) ·  Did you know? (108) ·  Good article reviews (232) ·  Barnstars (55) ·  Scripts (31)
|
 Archives |
|
2004 ·
2005 ·
2006 ·
2007 ·
2008 |
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Magic: The Gathering
Magic: The Gathering has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Protein
Protein has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for High-level radioactive waste management
High-level radioactive waste management has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)