Misplaced Pages

Roundup (herbicide): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:50, 28 June 2008 edit88.196.34.78 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:25, 13 December 2024 edit undoCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,461,185 edits Altered pmc. Added doi-access. Removed URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | Category:CS1 maint: PMC format | #UCB_Category 1/7 
(981 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{otheruses4|the herbicide|other uses|Round Up (disambiguation)}} {{short description|Glyphosate-based herbicide made by Monsanto}}
{{about|the herbicide originally developed by Monsanto|the active ingredient alone|glyphosate}}
{{use American English|date=August 2022}}
{{use mdy dates|date=August 2022}}
{{infobox
| title = Roundup
| image = ]
| caption =
| header1 = Manufacturing status
| label2 = Manufacturer
| data2 = ]
| label3 = Type
| data3 = ]
| label4 = Introduced to market
| data4 = 1974
| header5 = Purposes
| label6 = Agriculture
| data6 = Non-selective post-emergence weed control
| label7 = Government
| data7 =
| label8 = Consumer/home
| data8 =
| header9 = ] properties
| label10 = Surfactant
| data10 = ] (most common)
| label11 = Main active ingredient
| data11 = ] ] of ]
| label12 = Mode of action
| data12 = 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) inhibitor
| label13 = Website
| data13 = {{URL|https://roundup.com}}
}}
'''Roundup''' is a brand name of herbicide originally produced by ], which ] acquired in 2018. Prior to the late-2010s formulations, it used broad-spectrum ].<ref>{{Cite news|title=Monsanto No More: Agri-Chemical Giant's Name Dropped In Bayer Acquisition|work=] |date=June 4, 2018 |access-date=August 17, 2018|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/06/04/616772911/monsanto-no-more-agri-chemical-giants-name-dropped-in-bayer-acquisition|last=Domonoske |first=Camila}}</ref> As of 2009, sales of Roundup herbicides still represented about 10 percent of Monsanto's revenue despite competition from Chinese producers of other glyphosate-based herbicides.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14904184|title=The debate over whether Monsanto is a corporate sinner or saint|date=November 19, 2009 |newspaper=] |access-date=November 20, 2009}}</ref> The overall Roundup line of products represented about half of Monsanto's yearly revenue in 2009.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Cavallaro |first=Matt |date=June 26, 2009 |title=The Seeds Of A Monsanto Short Play |url=https://www.forbes.com/2009/06/29/monsanto-potash-fertilizer-personal-finance-investing-ideas-agrium-mosaic.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090703040305/http://www.forbes.com/2009/06/29/monsanto-potash-fertilizer-personal-finance-investing-ideas-agrium-mosaic.html |archive-date=2009-07-03 |access-date=July 11, 2009 |magazine=]}}</ref> The product is marketed to consumers by ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-01/scotts-miracle-gro-jumps-most-in-decade-on-pot-roundup-rebound|title=Scotts Miracle-Gro Jumps Most in Decade on Pot-Supplies Rebound |author=Jack Kaskey |publisher=Bloomberg |date=May 1, 2019}}</ref> In the late-2010s other non-glyphosate containing herbicides were also sold under the Roundup brand.<ref name="UNLExt">{{cite web |title=For the homeowner: Roundup® for Lawns? |url=https://turf.unl.edu/nta/5-11_20_Roundup_for_lawns.pdf |website=Nebraska Turfgrass Science |publisher=University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension |access-date=9 January 2024}}</ref><ref name="MSUExt">{{cite web |last1=Frank |first1=Kevin |last2=Hathaway |first2=Aaron |title=What's the difference between Roundup and Roundup For Lawns? |url=https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/difference_between_roundup_and_roundup_for_lawns |website=MSU Extension |publisher=Michigan State University Extension |access-date=9 January 2024 |language=en-us |date=31 March 2017}}</ref>


Monsanto patented the herbicidal use of glyphosate and derivatives in 1971.<ref>{{Cite patent|number=US3799758A|title=N-phosphonomethyl-glycine phytotoxicant compositions|gdate=1974-03-26|invent1=John|inventor1-first=Franz|url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US3799758A/en}}</ref> Commercial sale and usage in significant quantities started in 1974.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Benbrook |first=Charles M. |date=2016-02-02 |title=Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally |journal=Environmental Sciences Europe |volume=28 |issue=1 |pages=3 |doi=10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0 |doi-access=free |issn=2190-4715 |pmc=5044953 |pmid=27752438}}</ref> It retained exclusive rights to glyphosate in the US until its US patent expired in September 2000; in other countries the patent expired earlier. The Roundup trademark is registered with the ] and still extant. However, glyphosate is no longer under patent, so similar products use it as an active ingredient.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/label/labelque.htm#regprods|title=California Product/Label Database|publisher=Cdpr.ca.gov|access-date=2010-08-22}}</ref>
{{mergeto|Glyphosate|Talk:Glyphosate#Merge|date=June 2008}}


The main ] of Roundup is the ] ] of glyphosate. Another ingredient of Roundup is the ] POEA (]).
{{Refimprove|date=June 2007}}


Monsanto also produced seeds which grow into plants ] to be tolerant to glyphosate, which are known as '']'' crops. The genes contained in these seeds are patented. Such crops allow farmers to use glyphosate as a post-emergence herbicide against most broadleaf and cereal weeds.
{{Chembox new
| ImageFile = Glyphosate-2D-skeletal.png
| ImageSize =
| ImageFile2 = Glyphosate-3D-balls.png
| IUPACName =
| OtherNames =Glyphosate
| Section1 = {{Chembox Identifiers
| CASNo = 1071-83-6
| PubChem = | SMILES =
}}
| Section2 = {{Chembox Properties
| Formula = C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub>NO<sub>5</sub>P
| MolarMass =
| Appearance =
| Density =
| MeltingPt =
| BoilingPt =
| Solubility =
}}
| Section3 = {{Chembox Hazards
| MainHazards =
| FlashPt =
| Autoignition =
}}
}}
'''Roundup''' is the brand name of a systemic, broad-spectrum ] produced by the ] company ] and contains the active ingredient ]. Glyphosate is the most used herbicide in the USA<ref name="EPAusage"> US EPA 2000-2001 Pesticide Market Estimates , </ref> and is the most-sold ] of all time.{{Fact|date=March 2007}} In the US, 5-8 million pounds are used every year on lawns and yards and 85-90 million pounds are used annually in US agriculture.<ref name="EPAusage"/>


The health impacts of the product as well as its effects on the environment have been at the center of substantial legal and scientific controversies. In June 2020, Bayer agreed to pay $9.6 billion to settle tens of thousands of claims, mostly alleging that glyphosate-based Roundup had caused cancer.<ref name=":02">{{Cite news |last=Cohen |first=Patricia |date=2020-06-24 |title=Roundup Maker to Pay $10 Billion to Settle Cancer Suits |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/business/roundup-settlement-lawsuits.html |access-date=2020-06-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231224130733/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/business/roundup-settlement-lawsuits.html |archive-date=December 24, 2023 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref name=":1" >{{Cite web |date=December 23, 2023 |title=Bayer wins latest Roundup cancer trial, ending losing streak |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/bayer-wins-latest-roundup-cancer-trial-ending-losing-streak-2023-12-23/ |website=Reuters}}</ref>
Monsanto developed and ]ed the glyphosate molecule in the ], and marketed Roundup from 1973. It retained exclusive rights in the US until its US patent expired in September, 2000, and maintained a predominant marketshare in countries where the patent expired earlier.


==Composition==
The ] of Roundup is the ] ] of glyphosate. Glyphosate's mode of action is to inhibit an ] involved in the synthesis of the ]s ], ] and ]. It is absorbed through foliage and translocated to growing points. Weeds and grass will generally re-emerge within one to two months after usage. Because of this mode of action, it is only effective on actively growing plants; it is not effective as a ].
Glyphosate-based formulations may contain a number of ], the identities of which may be proprietary.<ref name="www2.epa.gov">{{cite web |url=http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/pesticide-registration-manual |title=Pesticide Registration Manual &#124; Pesticide Registration &#124; US EPA |date=March 4, 2013 |access-date=August 19, 2022 |archive-date=April 14, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160414065403/https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/pesticide-registration-manual |url-status=dead }}</ref> Surfactants are used in herbicide formulations as ] agents, to maximize coverage and aid penetration of the herbicide(s) through plant leaves. As agricultural spray adjuvants, surfactants may be pre-mixed into commercial formulations or they may be purchased separately and mixed on-site.<ref>{{cite web |title=Adjuvants for Enhancing Herbicide Performance |url=https://extension.psu.edu/adjuvants-for-enhancing-herbicide-performance |website=extension.psu.edu |publisher=Penn State Extension |access-date=15 August 2018 |language=en}}</ref>
Monsanto also produces seeds which grow into plants ] to be tolerant to glyphosate which are known as ''Roundup Ready'' crops. The genes contained in these seeds are patented. Such crops allow farmers to use glyphosate as a post-emergence herbicide against both broadleaf and cereal weeds. Soy was the first ] and was produced at Monsanto's ] Campus located in ]. In May 2007, a federal court decision barred new plantings of Roundup Ready ] and the resale of seeds, due to the failure of regulators to complete an ] examining the potential that genetically-modified alfalfa would contaminate non-GM alfalfa crops, encourage new weeds tolerant to herbicides and limit export markets.


] (POEA) is a surfactant used in the original Roundup formulation and was commonly used in 2015.<ref name=usgs.glyphosate.poea>{{cite web|title=Measuring POEA, a Surfactant Mixture in Herbicide Formulations|url=http://toxics.usgs.gov/highlights/glyphosate_poea.html|publisher=U.S. Geological Survey|access-date=August 19, 2022|archive-date=October 7, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151007051906/http://toxics.usgs.gov/highlights/glyphosate_poea.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> Different versions of Roundup have included different percentages of POEA. A 1997 US government report said that Roundup is 15% POEA while Roundup Pro is 14.5%.<ref name="fs.fed.us"/> Since POEA is more toxic to fish and amphibians than glyphosate alone, POEA is not allowed in aquatic formulations.<ref name="Langeland"/><ref name="fs.fed.us">Gary L. Diamond and Patrick R. Durkin February 6, 1997, under contract from the United States Department of Agriculture. </ref><ref name=Mann/>
==Chemistry==
Glyphosate is an aminophosphonic analogue of the natural amino acid ] and the name is a contraction of '']'', '']-'' and ''-ate''. It was first discovered to have herbicidal activity in 1970 by John Franz, a scientist who worked for the Monsanto company. Franz received the ] in 1987 from Ronald Reagan for his discoveries<ref>Technology Administration Agency, US Department of Commerce </ref> and in 1990 received the ] for Applied Chemistry.<ref>Colby Stong, The Scientist 1990, 4(10):28 </ref>


Non-glyphosate formulations of Roundup are typically used for lawns that glyphosate would otherwise kill. Both type of products being sold under the Roundup brand name can be a source of confusion for consumers.<ref name="MSUExt"/> Active ingredients for non-glyphosate formulations of Roundup can include ], ], ], and ], ], and ]<ref name="UNLExt"/><ref name="MSUExt"/>
==Biochemistry==
Glyphosate kills plants by inhibiting the ] 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), which ] the reaction of ]-3-phosphate (S3P) and ] to form 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate (ESP). ESP is subsequently ] to ], which is an essential precursor in plants for the ] ]s: ], ] and ].<ref>Purdue University, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Metabolic Plant Physiology Lecture notes, Aromatic amino acid biosynthesis, The shikimate pathway - synthesis of chorismate.</ref><ref> Saccharomyces Genome Database - S. cerevisiae Pathway: chorismate biosynthesis </ref> These amino acids are used as building blocks in ]s and to produce secondary metabolites such as ]s, ]s and ]. X-ray crystallographic studies of Glyphosate and EPSPS shows that glyphosate functions by occupying the binding site of the phosphoenol pyruvate, mimicking an intermediate state of the ternary enzyme substrates complex.<ref>E. Schönbrunn et al, Interaction of the herbicide glyphosate with its target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase in atomic detail, PNAS 2001,98:1376-1380 </ref> The ] pathway is not present in animals, which obtain aromatic amino acids from their diet. Glyphosate has also been shown to inhibit other plant enzymes<ref>(Su , L.Y. et al. 1992. The relationship of glyphosate treatment to sugar metabolism in sugarcane: New physiological insights. J. Plant Physiol. 140:168-173.)</ref><ref>(Lamb, D.C. et al. 1998. Glyphosate is an inhibitor of plant cytochrome P450: Functional expression of Thlaspi arvensae cytochrome P45071B1/ reductase fusion protein in Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 244:110114.)</ref> and also has been found to affect animal enzymes.<ref>(Hietanen, E., K. Linnainmaa, and H. Vainio. 1983. Effects of phenoxy herbicides and glyphosate on the hepatic and intestinal biotransformation activities in the rat. Acta Pharma. et Toxicol. 53:103-112.)</ref>


==Acute toxicity==
== Health, ecological concerns and controversy ==
The ] of different glyphosate-based formulations varies, especially with respect to the surfactants used. Formulations intended for terrestrial use that include the surfactant ] (POEA) can be more toxic than other formulations for aquatic species.<ref name=vbruggen>{{Cite journal |doi= 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309 |pmid= 29117584 |issn= 0048-9697 |volume= 616-617 |pages=255–268 |last1=Van Bruggen |first1= A.H.C. |last2= He |first2= M.M. |last3= Shin |first3= K. |last4= Mai |first4= V. |last5= Jeong |first5= K.C. |last6= Finckh |first6= M. R. |last7= Morris |first7= J.G. |title= Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate |journal= Science of the Total Environment |date= 2018-03-01 |bibcode= 2018ScTEn.616..255V }}</ref><ref name=SERA1997>{{Citation |title= Effects of Surfactants on the Toxicity of Glyphosate, with Specific Reference to Rodeo |publisher= Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. (SERA) |access-date= 2018-08-20 |url= https://www.fs.fed.us/r5/hfqlg/publications/herbicide_info/2003_glyphosate.pdf}}</ref> Due to the variety in available formulations, including five different glyphosate salts and different combinations of inert ingredients, it is difficult to determine how much surfactants contribute to the overall toxicity of each formulation.<ref name=SERA2003>{{Citation| title = Glyphosate: Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment | publisher= Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc.(SERA) |access-date = 2018-08-20| url = https://www.fs.fed.us/r5/hfqlg/publications/herbicide_info/2003_glyphosate.pdf}}</ref><ref name="Bradberry_2004"/> Independent scientific reviews and regulatory agencies have repeatedly concluded that glyphosate-based herbicides do not lead to a significant risk for human or environmental health when the product label is properly followed.<ref name="Rolando"/>
Roundup has an ] ] of III for oral and inhalation exposure,<ref name="epa_reds">U.S. EPA ReRegistration Decision Fact Sheet for Glyphosate (EPA-738-F-93-011) 1993. </ref> but more recent studies suggest that IV is appropriate for oral, dermal, and inhalation exposure.<ref name="wkc00"/> It has been rated as class I (Severe) for eye irritation, however.<ref name="wkc00"/>
A 2000 review of the available literature concluded that "under present and expected conditions of new use, there is no potential for Roundup herbicide to pose a health risk to humans".<ref name="wkc00">Williams GM, Kroes R, Munro IC. (2000) Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans. ''Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology'', 31 (2): 117-165. PMID 10854122.</ref>


=== False advertising === ===Human===
The acute oral toxicity for mammals is low,<ref name=vbruggen/> but death has been reported after deliberate overdose of ] Roundup.<ref name="pmid22835958">{{cite journal |vauthors= Sribanditmongkol P, Jutavijittum P, Pongraveevongsa P, Wunnapuk K, Durongkadech P |title= Pathological and toxicological findings in glyphosate-surfactant herbicide fatality: a case report |journal= The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology |volume= 33 |issue=3 |pages= 234–7 |date= Sep 2012 |doi= 10.1097/PAF.0b013e31824b936c |pmid= 22835958 |s2cid= 3457850 }}</ref> The surfactants in glyphosate formulations can increase the relative acute toxicity of the formulation.<ref name="Bradberry_2004">{{cite journal |vauthors= Bradberry SM, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA |title= Glyphosate poisoning |journal = Toxicological Reviews |volume= 23 |issue=3 |pages= 159–67 |year= 2004 |pmid= 15862083 |doi= 10.2165/00139709-200423030-00003 |s2cid= 5636017 }}</ref> Surfactants generally do not, however, cause ] (as opposed to additive effects) that increase the acute toxicity of glyphosate within a formulation.<ref name="Bradberry_2004"/> The surfactant POEA is not considered an acute toxicity hazard, and has an oral toxicity similar to ] and less toxic than ].<ref>{{cite journal |last1= Williams |first1=Gary M. |last2=Kroes |first2= Robert |last3=Munro |first3=Ian C. |title= Safety Evaluation and Risk Assessment of the Herbicide Roundup and Its Active Ingredient, Glyphosate, for Humans |journal=] |date=April 2000 |volume=31 |issue=2 |pages=117–165 |doi= 10.1006/rtph.1999.1371 |pmid=10854122 |s2cid=19831028 }}</ref> Deliberate ingestion of Roundup ranging from 85 to 200 ml (of 41% solution) has resulted in death within hours of ingestion, although it has also been ingested in quantities as large as 500 ml with only mild or moderate symptoms.<ref name="pmid1673618">{{cite journal |vauthors=Talbot AR, Shiaw MH, Huang JS, Yang SF, Goo TS, Wang SH, Chen CL, Sanford TR |title=Acute poisoning with a glyphosate-surfactant herbicide ('Roundup'): a review of 93 cases |journal=Human & Experimental Toxicology |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=1–8 |date=Jan 1991 |pmid=1673618 |doi= 10.1177/096032719101000101|s2cid=8028945 }}</ref> Consumption of over 85 ml of concentrated product is likely to cause serious symptoms in adults, including burns due to corrosive effects as well as kidney and liver damage. More severe cases lead to "respiratory distress, impaired consciousness, ], infiltration on chest X-ray, shock, arrhythmias, ] requiring haemodialysis, metabolic acidosis, and hyperkalaemia" and death is often preceded by ] and ]s.<ref name="Bradberry_2004"/>
In 1996 Monsanto was accused of false and misleading advertising of glyphosate products, prompting a law suit by the New York State attorney general.<ref></ref> <br>
On Fri Jan 20, 2007, Monsanto was convicted of false advertising of Roundup for presenting Roundup as biodegradable and claiming that it left the soil clean after use.
Environmental and consumer rights campaigners brought the case in 2001 on the basis that glyphosate, Roundup's main ingredient, is classed as "dangerous for the environment" and "toxic for aquatic organisms" by the European Union.
Monsanto France planned to appeal the verdict at the time. <ref></ref>


Skin exposure can cause irritation, and ] has been occasionally reported. Severe skin burns are very rare.<ref name="Bradberry_2004"/> In a 2017 risk assessment, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) wrote: "There is very limited information on skin irritation in humans. Where skin irritation has been reported, it is unclear whether it is related to glyphosate or co-formulants in glyphosate-containing herbicide formulations." The ECHA concluded that available human data was insufficient to support classification for skin corrosion or irritation.<ref></ref>
=== Scientific fraud ===
On two occasions the American EPA has caught scientists deliberately falsifying test results at research laboratories hired by Monsanto to study glyphosate.<ref>(US EPA Communications and Public Affairs 1991 ''Note to correspondents'' Washington DC Mar 1)</ref><ref>(US EPA Communications and Public Affairs 1991 Press Advisory. ''EPA lists crops associated with pesticides for which residue and environmental fate studies were allegedly manipulated''. Washington DC Mar 29)</ref><ref>(U.S. Congress. House of Representatives. Com. on Gov. Oper. 1984. ''Problems palgue the EPA pesticide registration activities''. House Report 98-1147)</ref> In the first incident involving Industrial Biotest Laboratories, an EPA reviewer stated after finding "routine falsification of data" that it was "hard to believe the scientific integrity of the studies when they said they took specimens of the ] from male rabbits".<ref>(U.S. EPA 1978 Data validation. Memo from K LOcke, Toxicology Branch, to R Taylor, Registration Branch. Washington DC Aug 9)</ref><ref>(U.S. EPA Office of pesticides and Toxic Substances 1983, ''Summary of the IBT review program''. Washington D.C. July)</ref><ref>Schneider, K. 1983. Faking it: The case against Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories. The Amicus Journal (Spring):14-26. Reproduced at </ref> In the second incident of falsifying test results in 1991, the owner of the lab (Craven Labs), and three employees were indicted on 20 felony counts, the owner was sentenced to 5 years in prison and fined 50,000 dollars, the lab was fined 15.5 million dollars and ordered to pay 3.7 million in restitution.<ref>(US Dept. of Justice. United States Attorney. Western District of Texas 1992. ''Texas laboratory, its president, 3 employees indicted on 20 felony counts in connection with pesticide testing''. Austin TX Sept 29) </ref><ref>(US EPA Communications, Education, And Public Affairs 1994 Press Advisory. ''Craven Laboratories, owner, and 14 employees sentenced for falsifying pesticide tests''. Washington DC Mar 4)</ref><ref></ref> Craven laboratories performed studies for 262 pesticide companies including Monsanto.


Inhalation is a minor route of exposure, but spray mist may cause oral or nasal discomfort, an unpleasant taste in the mouth, or tingling and irritation in the throat. Eye exposure may lead to mild conjunctivitis. Superficial corneal injury is possible if irrigation is delayed or inadequate.<ref name="Bradberry_2004"/>
Monsanto has stated that the studies have been repeated and that Roundup's EPA certification does not now use any studies from Craven Labs or IBT. Monsanto also claims that the Craven Labs investigation was started by the EPA after a pesticide industry task force discovered irregularities.<ref>Backgrounder: Testing Fraud: IBT and Craven Labs, June 2005, Monsanto background paper on RoundUp</ref>


===Aquatic===
=== Human and mammalian toxicity ===
Glyphosate formulations with POEA, such as Roundup, are not approved for aquatic use due to aquatic organism toxicity.<ref name="Langeland">{{cite web |title=SS-AGR-104 Safe Use of Glyphosate-Containing Products in Aquatic and Upland Natural Areas |url= https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/AG/AG24800.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070203235802/http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/AG/AG24800.pdf |archive-date=2007-02-03 |url-status=live |publisher= University of Florida |access-date=13 August 2018}}</ref> Due to the presence of POEA, glyphosate formulations only allowed for terrestrial use are more toxic for amphibians and fish than glyphosate alone.<ref name="Langeland"/><ref name="fs.fed.us"/><ref name=Mann>{{cite journal |vauthors=Mann RM, Hyne RV, Choung CB, Wilson SP |title= Amphibians and agricultural chemicals: Review of the risks in a complex environment|journal=Environmental Pollution |year=2009 |volume=157 |issue=11 |pages= 2903–2927 |doi= 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.015|pmid= 19500891|url= http://hdl.cqu.edu.au/10018/35613}}</ref> Terrestrial glyphosate formulations that include the surfactants POEA and MON 0818 (75% POEA) may have negative impacts on various aquatic organisms like ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name=vbruggen/> Aquatic organism exposure risk to terrestrial formulations with POEA is limited to drift or temporary water pockets.<ref name="Langeland"/> While laboratory studies can show effects of glyphosate formulations on aquatic organisms, similar observations rarely occur in the field when instructions on the herbicide label are followed.<ref name="Rolando">{{cite journal |last1=Rolando |first1=Carol |last2=Baillie |first2=Brenda |last3=Thompson |first3=Dean |last4=Little |first4=Keith |title=The Risks Associated with Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Use in Planted Forests |journal=Forests |date=12 June 2017 |volume=8 |issue=6 |pages=208 |doi= 10.3390/f8060208 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
Glyphosate itself is practically nontoxic by ingestion or by skin contact. The acute oral toxicity of Roundup is > 5,000 mg/kg in the rat.<ref></ref> It showed no toxic effects when fed to animals for 2 years, and only produced rare cases of reproductive effects when fed in extremely large doses to rodents and dogs. It has not demonstrated any increase in cancer rates in animal studies and is poorly absorbed in the digestive tract. Glyphosate has no significant potential to accumulate in animal tissue. <ref></ref><ref>http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/glyphogen.pdf</ref>


Studies in a variety of amphibians have shown the toxicity of products containing POEA to amphibian larvae. These effects include interference with gill morphology and mortality from either the loss of osmotic stability or asphyxiation. At sub-lethal concentrations, exposure to POEA or glyphosate/POEA formulations have been associated with delayed development, accelerated development, reduced size at ], developmental malformations of the tail, mouth, eye and head, histological indications of intersex and symptoms of oxidative stress.<ref name="Mann" /> Glyphosate-based formulations can cause ] in bullfrog tadpoles.<ref name=iarcmono>{{cite journal | url= https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono112-10.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180712091323/https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono112-10.pdf |archive-date=2018-07-12 |url-status=live |title= Glyphosate | journal = IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans | volume = 112 | date = 11 August 2016 | publisher=] | access-date= July 31, 2019}}</ref> The use of glyphosate-based pesticides are not considered the major cause of amphibian decline, the bulk of which occurred prior to widespread use of glyphosate or in pristine tropical areas with minimal glyphosate exposure.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite journal |vauthors= Wagner N, Reichenbecher W, Teichmann H, Tappeser B, Lötters S |title= Questions concerning the potential impact of glyphosate-based herbicides on amphibians |journal= Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry |volume= 32 |issue=8 |pages= 1688–700 |date= Aug 2013 |pmid= 23637092 |doi= 10.1002/etc.2268 |s2cid= 36417341 }}</ref>
Not only is glyphosate used as five different salts but commercial formulations of it contain surfactants, which vary in nature and concentration. As a result, human poisoning with this herbicide is not with the active ingredient alone but with complex and variable mixtures. <ref> Glyphosate poisoning study by Bradberry SM, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA.for the National Poisons Information Service (Birmingham Centre) and West Midlands Poisons Unit, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15862083 </ref>


A 2000 review of the toxicological data on Roundup concluded that "for terrestrial uses of Roundup minimal acute and chronic risk was predicted for potentially exposed nontarget organisms". It also concluded that there were some risks to aquatic organisms exposed to Roundup in shallow water.<ref name="Giesy2000">JP Giesy, KR Solomon, S Dobson (2000). "Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment for Roundup Herbicide". Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 167: 35-120</ref>
A review of the toxicological data on Roundup shows that there are at least 58 studies of the effects of Roundup itself on a range of organisms.<ref name="Giesy2000">JP Giesy, KR Solomon, S Dobson (2000). "Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment for Roundup Herbicide". Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 167: 35-120</ref> This review concluded that ''"for terrestrial uses of Roundup minimal acute and chronic risk was predicted for potentially exposed nontarget organisms"''. It also concluded that there were some risks to aquatic organisms exposed to Roundup in shallow water. More recent research suggests glyphosate induces a variety of functional abnormalities in fetuses and pregnant rats.<ref></ref> Also in recent mammalian research, glyphosate has been found to interfere with an enzyme involved testosterone production in mouse cell culture<ref name="walsh">Walsh ''et al'' Roundup inhibits steroidogenesis by disrupting steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein expression. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 108: 769–776.</ref> and to interfere with an estrogen biosynthesis enzyme in cultures of Human Placental cells.<ref name="Aromatase">Richard et al, Differential Effects of Glyphosate and Roundup on Human Placental Cells and Aromatase, Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 113, No.6, 716-720 </ref>


===Bees===
Studies have shown that the application of Roundup on wheat crops a week before harvesting results in higher glyphosate residue in the resulting grain and in the baked flour. <ref>WHO Environmental health criteria # 159 http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc159.htm#PartNumber:1]</ref>
Roundup Ready‐To‐Use, Roundup No Glyphosate, and Roundup ProActive have all been found to cause significant mortality in ]s when sprayed directly on them. It has been hypothesized that this is due to surfactants in the formulations blocking the tracheal system of the bees.<ref name="Straw2021">{{cite journal |last1=Straw |first1=Edward A. |last2=Carpentier |first2=Edward N. |last3=Brown |first3=Mark J. F. |title=Roundup causes high levels of mortality following contact exposure in bumble bees |journal=Journal of Applied Ecology |date=6 April 2021 |volume=58 |issue=6 |pages=1167–1176 |doi=10.1111/1365-2664.13867|doi-access=free }}</ref>


==Carcinogenicity==
The ],<ref>US EPA Reregistration Eligibility Decision - Glyphosate</ref> the EC Health and Consumer Protection Directorate, and the UN ] have all concluded that pure glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Opponents of glyphosate claim that Roundup has been found to cause genetic damage, citing Peluso et al.<ref>Peluso M, Munnia A, Bolognesi C, Parodi S. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1998 31:55-9 PMID 9464316 </ref> The authors concluded that the damage was "''not related to the active ingredient, but to another component of the herbicide mixture''.
There is limited evidence that human cancer risk might increase as a result of occupational exposure to large amounts of glyphosate, such as agricultural work, but no good evidence of such a risk from home use, such as in domestic gardening.<ref name=cruk>{{cite web
|publisher=Cancer Research UK
|title=Food Controversies&mdash;Pesticides and organic foods
|url=https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/diet-and-cancer/food-controversies#food_controversies4
|date=2016
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170206193833/https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/diet-and-cancer/food-controversies#food_controversies4
|access-date=November 28, 2017
|archive-date=February 6, 2017}}</ref> The consensus among national pesticide regulatory agencies and scientific organizations is that labeled uses of glyphosate have demonstrated no evidence of human ]icity.<ref name=Tarazona>{{cite journal
|last1=Tarazona |first1=Jose V. |last2=Court-Marques |first2=Daniele |last3=Tiramani |first3=Manuela |last4=Reich |first4=Hermine
|last5=Pfeil |first5=Rudolf |last6=Istace |first6=Frederique |last7=Crivellente |first7=Federica
|title=Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC
|journal=Archives of Toxicology
|date=April 3, 2017 |volume=91 |issue=8 |pages=2723–2743 |doi=10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5 |pmid=28374158 |pmc=5515989 }}</ref> Organizations such as the Joint ]/] Meeting on Pesticide Residues and the ], Canadian ], and the German ]<ref>{{Cite web| title = The BfR has finalised its draft report for the re-evaluation of glyphosate - BfR| access-date = 2018-08-18| url = https://www.bfr.bund.de/en/the_bfr_has_finalised_its_draft_report_for_the_re_evaluation_of_glyphosate-188632.html}}</ref> have concluded that there is no evidence that glyphosate poses a carcinogenic or ] risk to humans. The final assessment of the ] in 2017 was that "glyphosate does not pose a carcinogenic risk to humans".<ref>{{Cite book
|publisher=] |isbn=978-1-4129-6987-1
|last1=Guston |first1=David |last2=Ludlow |first2=Karinne
|title=Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society |chapter=Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority
|location=] |date=2010
|chapter-url=http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/nanoscience/n22.xml}}</ref> The EPA has evaluated the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate multiple times since 1986. In 1986, glyphosate was initially classified as Group C: "Possible Human Carcinogen", but later recommended as Group D: "Not Classifiable as to Human Carcinogenicity" due to lack of ] in previously examined rat tumor studies. In 1991, it was classified as Group E: "Evidence of Non-Carcinogenicity for Humans", and in 2015 and 2017, "Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans".<ref>{{Cite web
|author=OCSPP |title=EPA Releases Draft Risk Assessments for Glyphosate
|work=]
|format=Announcements and Schedules |access-date=August 18, 2018 |date=December 18, 2017
|url=https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/epa-releases-draft-risk-assessments-glyphosate}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|title=Revised Glyphosate Issue Paper: Evaluation of Carcinogenic Potential
|url=https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0361-0073
|publisher=EPA |pages= 12–13 |access-date=September 24, 2019}}</ref>


One international scientific organization, the ] (]), classified glyphosate in ], "probably carcinogenic to humans" in 2015.<ref name=iarcmono/> The variation in classification between this agency and others has been attributed to "use of different data sets" and "methodological differences in the evaluation of the available evidence".<ref name=Tarazona/> In 2017, California environmental regulators listed glyphosate as “known to the state to cause cancer.” The state's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment made the decision based in part on the report from the ]. State Proposition 65 requires the state office to add substances the international agency deems carcinogenic in humans or laboratory animals to a state list of cancer-causing items.<ref>{{Cite web |title=How chemicals are added to the Proposition 65 list |url=https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65/how-chemicals-are-added-proposition-65-list |access-date=2024-01-21 |website=oehha.ca.gov}}</ref>
There is a reasonable correlation between the amount of Roundup ingested and the likelihood of serious systemic sequelae or death. Ingestion of >85 mL of the concentrated formulation is likely to cause significant toxicity in adults. Gastrointestinal corrosive effects, with mouth, throat and epigastric pain and dysphagia are common. Renal and hepatic impairment are also frequent and usually reflect reduced organ perfusion. Respiratory distress, impaired consciousness, pulmonary oedema, infiltration on chest x-ray, shock, arrythmias, renal failure requiring haemodialysis, metabolic acidosis and hyperkalaemia may supervene in severe cases. Bradycardia and ventricular arrhythmias are often present pre-terminally. Dermal exposure to ready-to-use glyphosate formulations can cause irritation and photo-contact dermatitis has been reported occasionally; these effects are probably due to the preservative Proxel (benzisothiazolin-3-one). Severe skin burns are very rare. Inhalation is a minor route of exposure but spray mist may cause oral or nasal discomfort, an unpleasant taste in the mouth, tingling and throat irritation. Eye exposure may lead to mild conjunctivitis, and superficial corneal injury is possible if irrigation is delayed or inadequate. <ref> Glyphosate poisoning study by Bradberry SM, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA.for the National Poisons Information Service (Birmingham Centre) and West Midlands Poisons Unit, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15862083 </ref>


==Legal==
=== Aquatic effects ===
{{Primary sources section|date=December 2023}}
In the ten months following Bayer's June 2018 acquisition of Monsanto, its stock lost 46% of its value because of investor apprehension concerning the 11,200 lawsuits filed against its subsidiary.<ref name="Moutot">{{cite news|url=https://www.lesechos.fr/industrie-services/industrie-lourde/0600982774167-glyphosate-monsanto-condamne-pour-la-deuxieme-fois-aux-etats-unis-2255984.php|title=Glyphosate: nouveau revers judiciare pour Bayer|author=Anaïs Moutot|newspaper=Les Echos|date=28 March 2019|access-date=30 March 2019|language=fr}}</ref> As of 2023, around 165,000 claims have been made against Bayer, mostly alleging that Roundup had caused cancer.<ref name=":1" /> Bayer has settled tens of thousands of those claims and has agreed to pay billions in damages, but, as of 2023, more than 50,000 similar claims were still pending.<ref name=":1" /> In December 2023, Bayer won a case against a claim that Roundup had caused a man's cancer. In a statement they said the outcome was "consistent with the evidence in this case that Roundup does not cause cancer and is not responsible for the plaintiff's illness". At that time, Bayer had previously won 10 of 15 such cases.<ref name=":1"/>


Most cases claiming injury from Roundup are based on a failure-to-warn theory of liability, meaning Monsanto is liable for a plaintiff's injury because it failed to warn the plaintiff that Roundup can cause cancer. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2021, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in early 2024, held that such state-law failure to warn claims were not preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA"). In August 2024, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that FIFRA does preempt state-law failure to warn claims involving Roundup, expressly recognizing that its holding conflicts with that of the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits.<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 August 2024 |title=Schaffner v. Monsanto Corporation |url=https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/223075p.pdf |access-date=17 August 2024 |website=Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Stempel |date=16 August 2024 |title=Bayer wins US legal victory against Roundup cancer claims; shares surge |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/bayer-wins-big-us-legal-victory-against-roundup-cancer-claims-shares-surge-2024-08-16/ |access-date=17 August 2024 |website=Reuters}}</ref> This conflict among the Third, Ninth and Eleventh Circuit creates a heightened potential that the United States Supreme Court will review the Third Circuit's decision so that the Supreme Court can resolve the conflict among the Courts of Appeals.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Feeley |date=16 August 2024 |title=Bayer surges after Roundup appeal wins in Philadelphia court |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/bayer-wins-roundup-appeal-that-could-help-corral-cancer-suits |access-date=17 August 2024 |website=Blomberg Law}}</ref>
] and aquatic ] are more sensitive to Roundup than terrestrial organisms.<ref name="Giesy2000" /> Glyphosate is generally less persistent in water than in soil, with 12 to 60 day persistence observed in Canadian pond water, yet persistence of over a year have been observed in the sediments of ponds in Michigan and Oregon.<ref name="epa_reds"/><br>
The EU classifies Roundup as ''R51/53 Toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment.''<ref>http://lscgw1.monsanto.com/esh/msdslib.nsf/2B20DAEB04E8631C0625689700650B45/$file/Roundup%20Ultra%203000-5059en-gb.pdf Roundup Material Safety Data sheet page 7, heading 16 </ref>


===Cancer cases===
Roundup is not registered for aquatic uses<ref>Monsanto Backgrounder 2005 Response to "The impact of insecticides and herbicides on the biodiversity and productivity of aquatic communities" </ref> and studies of its effects on amphibians indicate it is toxic to them.<ref>Rick A. Relyea 2005 The impact of insecticides and herbicides on the biodiversity and productivity of aquatic communities Ecological Applications 15:618–627</ref> Glyphosate formulations that are registered for aquatic use have been found to have negligible adverse effects on sensitive amphibians.<ref>Wojtaszek et al Effects of vision herbicide on mortality, avoidance response, and growth of amphibian larvae in two forest wetlands Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23:832–842 2004 </ref>
<!-- If you update this, consider also updating ], ], ], and ]. -->


As of October 30, 2019, there were over 42,000 plaintiffs who said that glyphosate herbicides caused their cancer.<ref>{{cite news
=== Environmental degradation and effects ===
|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-30/bayer-is-now-facing-42-700-plaintiffs-in-roundup-litigation
When glyphosate comes into contact with the soil it can be rapidly bound to soil particles and be inactivated.<ref name="epa_reds">US EPA Reregistration Eligibility Decision - Glyphosate - (EPA-738-F-93-011) 1993 </ref> Unbound glyphosate can be degraded by bacteria.<ref>Balthazor, Terry M and Laurence Hallas (1986) Glyphosate-degrading microorganisms in industrial waste treatment biosystems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51:432-34.</ref> Low activity because of binding to soil particles suggests that glyphosate's effects on ] will be limited.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
|title=Bayer's Roundup Headache Grows as Plaintiffs Pile Into Court
Roundup has been shown to increase the disease rate in the crop following a sprayed crop, suggesting damaged ]. <ref> published online 26 August 2005 by M. R. Fernandeza, F. Sellesa, D. Gehlb, R. M. DePauwa and R. P. Zentner. </ref><br>
|date=October 30, 2019 |publisher=] |access-date=October 31, 2019
Low glyphosate concentrations can be found in many creeks and rivers in U.S. and Europe,{{Fact|date=February 2007}} and in the US glyphosate has been called "relatively persistent" by the EPA.<ref name="epa_reds"/><br>
|language=en}}</ref> After the ] classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans" in March 2015,<ref name="iarcmono" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=IARC Monograph on Glyphosate |url=https://www.iarc.who.int/featured-news/media-centre-iarc-news-glyphosate/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220712185952/https://www.iarc.who.int/featured-news/media-centre-iarc-news-glyphosate/ |archive-date=2022-07-12 |access-date=2023-09-04 |website=]}}</ref> many state and federal lawsuits were filed in the United States. Early on, over 300 of them were consolidated into a ] called ].<ref>{{Cite news
The EU classifies Roundup as ''N - Dangerous for the environment'' <ref>http://lscgw1.monsanto.com/esh/msdslib.nsf/2B20DAEB04E8631C0625689700650B45/$file/Roundup%20Ultra%203000-5059en-gb.pdf Roundup Material Safety Data sheet page 7, heading 16 </ref>
|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-14/monsanto-judge-pictures-weed-killer-showers-amid-cancer-debate
|title=Monsanto's Cancer Fight Judge Pictures Weed Killer Showers
|date=March 14, 2018 |access-date=August 17, 2018 |publisher=]}}</ref>


On August 10, 2018, ], who has ], was awarded $289 million in damages (later cut to $78 million on appeal<ref>{{cite news
In soils, half lives vary from as little as 3 days at a site in Texas, 141 days at a site in Iowa, to between 1 - 3 years in Swedish forest soils.<ref></ref> It appears that more northern sites have the longest soil persistences such as in Canada and Scandinavia.
|title=Groundskeeper Accepts Reduced $78 Million Award In Monsanto Cancer Suit
|first=Emily |last=Sullivan |publisher=]
|url=https://www.npr.org/2018/11/01/662812333/groundskeeper-accepts-reduced-78-million-in-monsanto-cancer-suit
|access-date=July 29, 2019}}</ref> then reduced to $21 million after another appeal<ref>{{cite news
|last1=Egelko |first1=Bob |title=Award to Vallejo groundskeeper in Monsanto cancer case slashed again - verdict upheld
|url=https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Award-to-Vallejo-groundskeeper-in-Monsanto-cancer-15421705.php
|access-date=March 3, 2021 |publisher=]
|date=July 21, 2020}}</ref>) after a jury in ] found that Monsanto had failed to adequately warn consumers of cancer risks posed by the herbicide.<ref>{{cite news
|title=Monsanto ordered to pay $289 million in world's first Roundup...
|work=Reuters |access-date=August 17, 2018 |date=August 11, 2018
|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-monsanto-cancer-lawsuit/jury-orders-monsanto-to-pay-290-million-in-california-roundup-cancer-trial-idUSKBN1KV2HB}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45154362
|title=Weedkiller 'doesn't cause cancer' - Bayer
|date=August 11, 2018 |work=] |access-date=August 11, 2018
|language=en-GB}}</ref> Johnson had routinely used two different glyphosate formulations in his work as a groundskeeper, RoundUp and another Monsanto product called Ranger Pro.<ref name="smh">{{Cite news
|last=Johnston |first=Gretel |title=Dying cancer patient awarded $395m in Monsanto Roundup case
|work=The Sydney Morning Herald |access-date=August 18, 2018 |date=August 11, 2018
|url= https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/dying-cancer-patient-awarded-a395m-in-monsanto-roundup-case-20180811-p4zwww.html}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last1=Judkins |first1=Donna R |title=Draft Ecological Risk Assessment for the Registration Review of Dichlorvos, Naled, and Trichlorfon |date=June 17, 2020 |page=33 |publisher=UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |last2=Wente |first2=Stephen P}}</ref> The jury's verdict addressed the question of whether Monsanto knowingly failed to warn consumers that RoundUp could be harmful, but not whether RoundUp causes cancer.<ref>{{Cite news |issn=0027-8378 |last=Ebersole |first=Rene |title=Monsanto Just Lost a Case Linking Its Weed Killer to Cancer |magazine=] |access-date=August 18, 2018 |date=August 17, 2018 |url=https://www.thenation.com/article/monsanto-just-lost-a-case-linking-its-weedkiller-to-cancer/ |archive-date=August 17, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180817153043/https://www.thenation.com/article/monsanto-just-lost-a-case-linking-its-weedkiller-to-cancer/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> Court documents from the case alleged the company's efforts to influence scientific research via ].<ref name=HakimNYT>{{Cite news |work=]
|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/business/monsantos-sway-over-research-is-seen-in-disclosed-emails.html
|title=Monsanto Emails Raise Issue of Influencing Research on Roundup Weed Killer
|first=Danny |last=Hakim |date=August 1, 2018 |access-date=October 13, 2018 |language=en}}</ref>


In January 2019, ] decided to stop carrying Roundup or other glyphosate-based herbicides. The decision was reportedly influenced in part by the public court cases.<ref>{{Cite web
However, the binding of glyphosate to particulates can be an advantage for the detoxification of industrial toxin-polluted streams containing a wide class of toxicants.
|url=https://people.com/home/costco-removes-roundup-after-2-billion-lawsuit
Treatment of industrial wastewater using immobilized bacteria showed complete conversion of glyphosate to nontoxic aminomethylphosphonic acid.<ref>Adams, William, ], and Michael Heitkamp. 1994. Microbes and their use to degrade N-phosphonomethylglycine in waste streams. United States Patent 5288635 </ref>
|title=Costco Will Reportedly Remove Roundup from Stores After $2 Billion Awarded to Couple Who Claimed Weed Killer Caused Their Cancer
|magazine=] |language=en |access-date=December 8, 2019}}</ref>


In March 2019, a man was awarded $80 million (later cut to $26 million on appeal<ref name="AP2019-07-15">{{cite news|url=https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2019/07/15/80-million-award-reduced-monsanto-roundup-cancer-patient/|title=Judge Reduces $80M Award In Roundup Case; Cancer Patient, Monsanto Both Consider Appeal|date=2019-07-15|access-date=2019-07-27|publisher=]|agency=Associated Press|location=San Francisco}}</ref>) in a lawsuit claiming Roundup was a substantial factor in his cancer.<ref>{{cite news | title = Jury Awards $80 Million In Damages In Roundup Weed Killer Cancer Trial |first=Richard |last=Gonzales |date=March 29, 2019 |publisher=]
A recent study concluded that certain amphibians may be at risk from glyphosate use.<ref>Bette Hileman. (2005) Common herbicide kills tadpoles. Chemical & Engineering News. Washington 83(15):11.</ref> One study has shown an effect on growth and survival of earthworms.<ref>(Springett & Gray 1992, ''Soil Biol. Biochem''. 24 (12):1739-1744) </ref> The results of this study are in conflict with other data and has been criticized on methodological grounds.<ref name="Giesy2000">JP Giesy, KR Solomon, S Dobson (2000). "Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment for Roundup Herbicide". Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 167: 35-120</ref> In other studies nitrogen fixing bacteria have been impaired, and also crop plant susceptibility to disease has been increased.<ref>(Santos & Flores 1995, ''Lett. Appl.'' Microbiol. 20:349-352)</ref><ref>(Brammel & Higgins 1988, ''Can. J. Bot'' 66:1547-1555)</ref><ref>(Johal & Rahe 1988, Molec. Plant Pathol. 32:267-281)</ref><ref>(Mekwatanakarn & Sivassithamparam 1987, ''Biol. Fertil. Soils'' 5:175-180)</ref><ref>(Kawate et al. 1997, ''Weed Sci''. 45:739-743)</ref><ref>(Bergvinson & Borden 1992, ''Can J. For. Res''. 22:206-209)</ref> <ref> published online 26 August 2005 by M. R. Fernandeza, F. Sellesa, D. Gehlb, R. M. DePauwa and R. P. Zentner. </ref><br>
|url=https://www.npr.org/2019/03/27/707439575/jury-awards-80-million-in-damages-in-roundup-weed-killer-cancer-trial | access-date=2019-07-29}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | title = Louisville lawyer wins $80M verdict against Monsanto over weedkiller Roundup | first = Andrew | last = Wolfson | work = ] | location = Louisville, Kentucky | date = 2019-03-28 | url = https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/2019/03/28/monsanto-roundup-cancer-lawsuit-louisville-lawyer-wins-huge-verdict-80-million/3295421002/ | access-date = 2019-07-29}}</ref> U.S. District Judge ] stated that a punitive award was appropriate because the evidence "easily supported a conclusion that Monsanto was more concerned with tamping down safety inquiries and manipulating public opinion than it was with ensuring its product is safe." Chhabria stated that there was evidence on both sides as to whether glyphosate causes cancer, and that the behavior of Monsanto showed "a lack of concern about the risk that its product might be carcinogenic."<ref name="AP2019-07-15" />
Monsanto firmly denies any negative impact on anything, including wildlife, and has many studies it has funded to back up its position.{{Fact|date=April 2008}} They would also be quick to point out that any possible negative impact on earthworms and nitrogen fixing bacteria, etc., would be offset by greater yields {{Fact|date=April 2008}}, which have not been proven, due to the elimination of weeds, and also would point to soil benefits from less mechanical cultivation of weeds by using Roundup and similar products.


On May 13, 2019, a jury in California ordered Bayer to pay a couple $2 billion in damages (later cut to $87 million on appeal<ref name=LessGelt2B>{{cite news
===Endocrine disruptor debate===
|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/07/26/judge-cuts-billion-award-couple-with-cancer-million-roundup-lawsuit
An in-vitro study<ref>Walsh LP et al. Roundup inhibits steroidogenesis by disrupting steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein expression. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Aug;108(8):769-76.</ref> has suggested glyphosate may have an effect on progesterone production in mammalian cells and affect mortality of placental cells in-vitro.<ref name="Aromatase" /> Whether these studies classify glyphosate as an ] is a matter of debate.
|title=Judge cuts $2 billion award for couple with cancer to $86.7 million in Roundup lawsuit |last=Telford |first=Taylor
|date=July 26, 2019 |newspaper=]
|access-date=July 27, 2019}}</ref>) after finding that the company had failed to adequately inform consumers of the possible carcinogenicity of Roundup.<ref>{{Cite news
|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-13/bayer-loses-its-third-trial-over-claims-roundup-causes-cancer
|title=Bayer's $2 Billion Roundup Damages Boost Pressure to Settle
|newspaper=Bloomberg.com |date=May 13, 2019 |publisher=Bloomberg News |access-date=May 14, 2019}}</ref> On December 19, 2019, it was announced that Timothy Litzenburg, the lawyer for the RoundUp Virginia plaintiffs had been charged with extortion after offering to stop searching for more plaintiffs if he was paid a $200 million consulting fee by a manufacturer of glyphosate.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/timothy-litzenburg-former-monsanto-roundup-lawyer-charged-with-extortion/|title=Roundup suit lawyer accused of $200 million extortion plot|website=] |date=December 18, 2019 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.agri-pulse.com/articles/12976-lawyer-for-roundup-plaintiffs-charged-with-extortion|title = Lawyer for Roundup plaintiffs charged with extortion}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-otc-masstorts/doj-charges-roundup-plaintiffs-lawyer-in-200-million-alleged-extortion-scheme-idUSKBN1YM2L9|title = DOJ charges Roundup plaintiffs' lawyer in $200 million alleged extortion scheme|newspaper = Reuters|date = 19 December 2019}}</ref> Litzenburg and his partner Daniel Kincheloe pleaded guilty to the charges and they were sentenced to two and one years in prison respectively.<ref>{{cite news
|title=Virginia lawyers get prison terms for $200M Roundup extortion scheme
|url=https://today.westlaw.com/Document/I50a628d0f9f211eaadd8fa89d4036ae0/View/FullText.html
|access-date=December 1, 2021 |website=] |agency=Reuters Legal |date=September 18, 2020}}</ref>


In June 2020, Bayer agreed to settle over a hundred thousand Roundup lawsuits, agreeing to pay $8.8 to $9.6 billion to settle those claims, and $1.5 billion for any future claims. The settlement does not include three cases that have already gone to jury trials and are being appealed.<ref></ref> However the settlement was not allowed to cover future cases.<ref name=":1" />
Some believe that in-vitro studies are insufficient, and are waiting to see if animal studies show a change in endocrine activity, since a change in a single cell line may not occur in an entire organism. Additionally, current in-vitro studies expose cell lines to concentrations orders of magnitude greater than would be found in real conditions, and through pathways that would not be experienced in real organism.


===False advertising===
Others believe that in-vitro studies, particularly ones identifying not only an effect, but a chemical pathway, are sufficient evidence to classify glyphosate as an endocrine disruptor, on the basis that even small changes in endocrine activity can have lasting effects on an entire organism that may be difficult to detect through whole organism studies alone. Further research on the topic has been planned.
In 1996, Monsanto was accused of false and misleading advertising of glyphosate products, prompting a lawsuit by the New York State attorney general.<ref>{{Cite web |author=mindfully.org |url=http://www.mindfully.org/Pesticide/Monsanto-v-AGNYnov96.htm |title=Attorney General of the State of New York. Consumer Frauds and Protection Bureau. Environmental Protection Bureau. 1996. In the matter of Monsanto Company, respondent. Assurance of discontinuance pursuant to executive law § 63(15). New York, NY, Nov |publisher=Mindfully.org |access-date=2010-08-22 |archive-date=July 6, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090706091235/http://www.mindfully.org/Pesticide/Monsanto-v-AGNYnov96.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> Monsanto had made claims that its spray-on glyphosate based herbicides, including Roundup, were safer than table salt and "practically non-toxic" to mammals, birds, and fish, "environmentally friendly", and "biodegradable".<ref name="ap-false">{{cite news |title=Monsanto Agrees to Modify Roundup Ads in New York State
|author=Talbot, AR |author2=Shiaw, MH |author3=Huang, JS |author4=Yang, SF
|url=https://www.apnews.com/d196b9a5bb54637a7b281760b0f7a966 |access-date=14 October 2018 | publisher =Associated Press |date=25 November 1996}}</ref> Citing avoidance of costly litigation, Monsanto settled the case, admitting no wrongdoing, and agreeing to remove the offending advertising claims in New York State.<ref name="ap-false" />


Environmental and consumer rights campaigners brought a case in France in 2001 accusing Monsanto of presenting Roundup as "biodegradable" and claiming that it "left the soil clean" after use; glyphosate, Roundup's main ingredient, was classed by the European Union as "dangerous for the environment" and "toxic for aquatic organisms". In January 2007, Monsanto was convicted of false advertising and fined 15,000 euros. The result was confirmed in 2009.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8308903.stm|title=Monsanto guilty in 'false ad' row |date=2009-10-15 |work=BBC News |access-date=2009-10-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2009/10/15/monsanto-definitivement-condamne-pour-publicite-mensongere-a-propos-du-round-up_1254230_3244.html |title=Monsanto définitivement condamné pour "publicité mensongère" à propos du Round Up |language=fr |trans-title=Monsanto finally convicted for 'false advertising' about the Round Up |date=2009-10-15 |newspaper=Le Monde |location=Paris}}</ref>
== Glyphosate resistance in weeds and microorganisms ==


On 27 March 2020 Bayer settled claims in a proposed class action alleging that it falsely advertised that the active ingredient in Roundup Weed & Grass Killer only affects plants with a $39.5 million deal that included changing the labels on its products.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.law360.com/articles/1257915/monsanto-to-pay-39m-in-roundup-false-ad-class-settlement|title=Monsanto To Pay $39M In Roundup False Ad Class Settlement - Law360|website=www.law360.com|language=en|access-date=2020-03-30}}</ref>
The first documented cases of weed resistance to glyphosate were found in Australia, involving rigid ryegrass near Orange, New South Wales.<ref></ref> Some farmers in the United States have expressed concern that weeds are now developing with glyphosate resistance, with 13 states now reporting resistance, and this poses a problem to many farmers, including cotton farmers, that are now heavily dependent on glyphosate to control weeds.<ref></ref><ref></ref> Farmers associations are now reporting 103 biotypes of weeds within 63 weed species with herbicide resistance, and this will continue to grow as a problem.<ref></ref><ref></ref>


In June 2023, Bayer reached a $6.9 million settlement agreement with the New York attorney general, settling false advertising allegations concerning the safety of Roundup.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Stempel |first1=Jonathan |title=Bayer reaches $6.9 million settlement with New York over Roundup safety claims |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/bayer-reaches-69-mln-settlement-with-new-york-over-roundup-safety-claims-2023-06-15/ |access-date=21 June 2023 |publisher=Reuters |date=15 June 2023}}</ref>
Some ] have a version of 5-enolpyruvoyl-shikimate-3-phosphate ] (EPSPS) that is resistant to glyphosate ]. The version used in ] was ]d from '']'' strain CP4 (CP4 EPSPS) that was ] to glyphosate.<ref>Development and Characterization of a CP4 EPSPS-Based, Glyphosate-Tolerant Corn Event,G. R. Heck et al Crop Sci. 45:329-339 (2005).</ref><ref>Molecular basis for the herbicide resistance of Roundup Ready crops, T. Funke et al, PNAS 2006 103:13010-13015 </ref> The CP4 EPSPS gene was ] and inserted into soybeans. The CP4 EPSPS gene was engineered for ] by ] the 5' end of the gene to a ] ] derived from the ] EPSPS. This transit peptide was used because it had shown previously an ability to deliver bacterial EPSPS to the chloroplasts of other plants. The ] used to move the gene into soybeans was PV-GMGTO4. It contained three bacterial genes, two PC4 EPSPS genes, and a gene ] ] (]) from '']'' as a marker. The DNA was injected into the soybeans using the ]. Soybean cultivar A54O3 was used for the ]. The ] of the GUS gene was used as the initial evidence of transformation. GUS expression was detected by a staining method in which the GUS enzyme converts a ] into a blue ]. Those plants that showed GUS expression were then taken and sprayed with glyphosate and their tolerance was tested over many generations.


===Falsification of test results ===
==Genetically modified crops==
Some tests originally conducted on glyphosate by contractors were later found to have been fraudulent, along with tests conducted on other pesticides. Concerns were raised about toxicology tests conducted by ] in the 1970s<ref>{{cite web |publisher=U.S. EPA Office of pesticides and Toxic Substances |date=July 1983 |title=Summary of the IBT review program |url=https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=91014ULV.TXT}}</ref> and ] was found to have fraudulently analysed samples for residues of glyphosate in 1991.<ref>{{cite news |author=Keith Schneider |work=New York Times |title=U.S. Seeks to Learn if Tests On Pesticides Were Falsified |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/02/us/us-seeks-to-learn-if-tests-on-pesticides-were-falsified.html |access-date=20 September 2018 |date=1991-03-02 |language=en}}</ref> Monsanto has stated that the studies have since been repeated.<ref>{{cite web |work=Backgrounder |title=Testing Fraud: IBT and Craven Labs |date=June 2005 |publisher=Monsanto |url=http://www.monsanto.com/products/Documents/glyphosate-background-materials/ibt_craven_bkg.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101208233014/http://www.monsanto.com/products/Documents/glyphosate-background-materials/ibt_craven_bkg.pdf |archive-date=2010-12-08 |url-status=live}}</ref>
In ], genetically modified ''Roundup Ready'' ] resistant to Roundup became commercially available, followed by ''Roundup Ready'' ] in 1998<ref></ref>. Current ''Roundup Ready'' crops include ], ] (corn), ], ], ], and ], with ] still under development. These cultivars greatly improved conventional farmers' ability to control ]s since glyphosate could be sprayed on fields without hurting the crop. As of 2005, 87% of U.S. soybean fields were planted to glyphosate resistant varieties.<ref>USDA/APHIS Environmental Assessment - In response to Monsanto Petition 06-178-01p seeking a Determination of Non-regulated Status for
+ Roundup RReady2Yield Soybean MON 89788, OECD Unique Identifier MON-89788-1, U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
+ Biotechnology Regulatory Services page 13</ref><ref>National Agriculture Statistics Service (2005) in Acreage eds. Johanns, M. & Wiyatt, S. D. 6 30, (U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).
+ </ref>
The use of roundup ready crops has changed the herbicide use profile away from atrazine, metribuzin and alachlor. This has the benefit of reducing the dangers of herbicide run off into drinking water <ref>Impact of glyphosate-tolerant soybean and glufosinate-tolerant corn production on herbicide losses in surface runoff. Shipitalo MJ, Malone RW, Owens LB. J Environ Qual. 2008 37(2):401-8 PMID 18268303</ref>.


==Tradenames== ===Ban in France===
In January 2019, Roundup Pro 360 was banned in France following a ] court ruling that regulator ] had not given due weight to safety concerns when they approved the product in March 2017. The ban went into effect immediately. The court's decision cited research by the ], based in Lyon.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.france24.com/en/20190116-weedkiller-roundup-banned-france-after-court-ruling|title=Weedkiller Roundup banned in France after court ruling|date=2019-01-16|website=France 24|language=en|access-date=2019-01-16}}</ref><ref name=FrenchBan>{{cite news
The Roundup trademark is registered with the US Patent Office and still extant. However, the chemical formulation is no longer under patent, so similar products using glyphosate as the active ingredient are available from other maufacturers and marketed under many names,<ref></ref> including Buccanner, Razor Pro, (41%), Roundup Pro Concentrate (50.2 %), Rodeo (51.2%), Aquaneat
|newspaper=Reuters |title=French court cancels Monsanto weedkiller permit on safety grounds
(53.8%), and Aquamaster (53.5%)<ref></ref>
|date=January 15, 2019 |access-date=January 16, 2019
|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bayer-monsanto-france/french-court-cancels-monsanto-weedkiller-permit-on-safety-grounds-idUSKCN1P91F6}}</ref>


==Use with genetically modified crops==
==Other uses==
{{main|Roundup Ready}}
Glyphosate is one of a number of herbicides used by the ] government to spray ]n ] fields through ]. There are reports that widespread application of glyphosate in attempts to destroy coca crops in South America have resulted in the development of glyphosate-resistant strains of coca which have been ] to be both "Roundup ready" and also larger and higher yielding than the original strains of the plant. <ref>New Super Strain of Coca Plant Stuns Anti-Drug Officials. Jeremy McDermott. The Scotsman (Scotland) 27 August 2004</ref> However, there are no reports of glyphosate-resistant coca in the peer-reviewed literature.<ref></ref> In addition, since spraying of herbicides is not permitted in Colombian national parks, this has encouraged coca growers to move into park areas, cutting down the natural vegetation, and establishing coca plantations within park lands.


Monsanto first developed Roundup in the 1970s. End-users initially used it in a similar way to ] and ] – as a non-selective herbicide. Application of glyphosate-based herbicides to row crops resulted in problems with crop damage and kept them from being widely used for this purpose. In the United States, use of Roundup experienced rapid growth following the commercial introduction of a ] in 1996.<ref>{{cite journal |last1= Duke |first1= Stephen O. |title= The history and current status of glyphosate |journal= Pest Management Science |volume= 74 |issue= 5 |pages= 1027–1034 |doi= 10.1002/ps.4652 |pmid= 28643882 |url= http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1766/ |access-date= 20 August 2018|year= 2018 |s2cid= 4408706 |doi-access= free }}</ref> "Roundup Ready" became Monsanto's trademark for its patented line of crop seeds that are resistant to Roundup. Between 1990 and 1996 sales of Roundup increased around 20% per year.<ref>{{Cite news | title = Top-selling herbicide not close to withering | work = Wall Street Journal | access-date = 2018-08-12 | date = 1996-01-08 | url = https://www.newspapers.com/clip/22746669/topselling_herbicide_not_close_to/ | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180813111128/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/22746669/topselling_herbicide_not_close_to/ | archive-date = 2018-08-13 | url-status = live}}</ref> {{As of| 2015}} the product was used in over 160 countries.<ref name=natgeo>
==External links==
{{Cite web
{{linkfarm}}
| title = What Do We Really Know About Roundup Weed Killer?
*
| work = National Geographic News
*
| access-date = 2018-08-13
*
| date = 2015-04-23
*
| url = https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/04/150422-glyphosate-roundup-herbicide-weeds/
*
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180813111122/https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/04/150422-glyphosate-roundup-herbicide-weeds/
*
| archive-date = 2018-08-13 | url-status = dead
*
}}
*
</ref>
*http://www.gene.ch/genet/1999/Jun/msg00012.html
Roundup is used most heavily on corn, soy, and cotton crops that have been genetically modified to withstand the chemical, but {{as of | 2012 | lc = on}} glyphosate treated approximately 5 million acres in ] for crops like ], ], ], ], ], ], and ],<ref>
*
{{Cite web
*
| title = What Do We Really Know About Roundup Weed Killer?
*
| work = National Geographic News
* Graphic network of Business and political connections for Monsanto
| date = 2015-04-23
* http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-842180934463681887
| url = https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/04/150422-glyphosate-roundup-herbicide-weeds/
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180813111122/https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/04/150422-glyphosate-roundup-herbicide-weeds/
| archive-date = 2018-08-13
| url-status = dead
| access-date = 13 July 2020
| quote = some five million acres in California were treated with glyphosate in 2012 to grow almonds, peaches, onions, cantaloupe, cherries, sweet corn, citrus, grapes, and other edible crops.
}}
</ref> although the product is only applied directly to certain varieties of sweet corn.

==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
{{reflist}}


==Further reading== ==Further reading==
*Baccara, Mariagiovanna, et al. , NYU Stern School of Business: August 2001, Revised July 14, 2003. * Baccara, Mariagiovanna, et al. , NYU Stern School of Business: August 2001, Revised July 14, 2003.
*Pease W S et al. (1993) Preventing pesticide-related illness in California agriculture: Strategies and priorities. Environmental Health Policy Program Report. Berkeley, CA: University of California. School of Public Health. California Policy Seminar. * Pease W S et al. (1993) ”Preventing pesticide-related illness in California agriculture: Strategies and priorities”. Environmental Health Policy Program Report. Berkeley, CA: ]. School of Public Health. California Policy Seminar.
*Wang Y, Jaw C and Chen Y (1994) Accumulation of 2,4-D and glyphosate in fish and water hyacinth. Water Air Soil Pollute. 74:397-403 * Wang Y, Jaw C and Chen Y (1994) “Accumulation of 2,4-D and glyphosate in fish and water hyaacinth”. Water Air Soil Pollute. 74:397–403

*Marie-Monique Robin. (2008) Le monde selon Monsanto. Arte Editions (book written in french). ISBN 978-2-7071-4918-3. An overview of Monsanto products: PCB, Dioxine,Roundup, Bovine Growth Hormone, OGM.
==External links==
* {{Official website|https://roundup.com/en-us/home}}
* —The main ingredient in Roundup
* ; {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020919180630/http://www.epa.gov/safewater/dwh/c-soc/glyphosa.html |date=2002-09-19 }}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Roundup (Herbicide)}}
]
] ]
]
]


] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:25, 13 December 2024

Glyphosate-based herbicide made by Monsanto This article is about the herbicide originally developed by Monsanto. For the active ingredient alone, see glyphosate.

Roundup
Manufacturing status
ManufacturerBayer
TypeHerbicide
Introduced to market1974
Purposes
AgricultureNon-selective post-emergence weed control
Herbicide properties
SurfactantPolyethoxylated tallow amine (most common)
Main active ingredientIsopropylamine salt of glyphosate
Mode of action5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) inhibitor
Websiteroundup.com

Roundup is a brand name of herbicide originally produced by Monsanto, which Bayer acquired in 2018. Prior to the late-2010s formulations, it used broad-spectrum glyphosate-based herbicides. As of 2009, sales of Roundup herbicides still represented about 10 percent of Monsanto's revenue despite competition from Chinese producers of other glyphosate-based herbicides. The overall Roundup line of products represented about half of Monsanto's yearly revenue in 2009. The product is marketed to consumers by Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. In the late-2010s other non-glyphosate containing herbicides were also sold under the Roundup brand.

Monsanto patented the herbicidal use of glyphosate and derivatives in 1971. Commercial sale and usage in significant quantities started in 1974. It retained exclusive rights to glyphosate in the US until its US patent expired in September 2000; in other countries the patent expired earlier. The Roundup trademark is registered with the US Patent and Trademark Office and still extant. However, glyphosate is no longer under patent, so similar products use it as an active ingredient.

The main active ingredient of Roundup is the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate. Another ingredient of Roundup is the surfactant POEA (polyethoxylated tallow amine).

Monsanto also produced seeds which grow into plants genetically engineered to be tolerant to glyphosate, which are known as Roundup Ready crops. The genes contained in these seeds are patented. Such crops allow farmers to use glyphosate as a post-emergence herbicide against most broadleaf and cereal weeds.

The health impacts of the product as well as its effects on the environment have been at the center of substantial legal and scientific controversies. In June 2020, Bayer agreed to pay $9.6 billion to settle tens of thousands of claims, mostly alleging that glyphosate-based Roundup had caused cancer.

Composition

Glyphosate-based formulations may contain a number of adjuvants, the identities of which may be proprietary. Surfactants are used in herbicide formulations as wetting agents, to maximize coverage and aid penetration of the herbicide(s) through plant leaves. As agricultural spray adjuvants, surfactants may be pre-mixed into commercial formulations or they may be purchased separately and mixed on-site.

Polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA) is a surfactant used in the original Roundup formulation and was commonly used in 2015. Different versions of Roundup have included different percentages of POEA. A 1997 US government report said that Roundup is 15% POEA while Roundup Pro is 14.5%. Since POEA is more toxic to fish and amphibians than glyphosate alone, POEA is not allowed in aquatic formulations.

Non-glyphosate formulations of Roundup are typically used for lawns that glyphosate would otherwise kill. Both type of products being sold under the Roundup brand name can be a source of confusion for consumers. Active ingredients for non-glyphosate formulations of Roundup can include MCPA, quinclorac, dicamba, and sulfentrazone, penoxsulam, and 2,4-D

Acute toxicity

The lethal dose of different glyphosate-based formulations varies, especially with respect to the surfactants used. Formulations intended for terrestrial use that include the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA) can be more toxic than other formulations for aquatic species. Due to the variety in available formulations, including five different glyphosate salts and different combinations of inert ingredients, it is difficult to determine how much surfactants contribute to the overall toxicity of each formulation. Independent scientific reviews and regulatory agencies have repeatedly concluded that glyphosate-based herbicides do not lead to a significant risk for human or environmental health when the product label is properly followed.

Human

The acute oral toxicity for mammals is low, but death has been reported after deliberate overdose of concentrated Roundup. The surfactants in glyphosate formulations can increase the relative acute toxicity of the formulation. Surfactants generally do not, however, cause synergistic effects (as opposed to additive effects) that increase the acute toxicity of glyphosate within a formulation. The surfactant POEA is not considered an acute toxicity hazard, and has an oral toxicity similar to vitamin A and less toxic than aspirin. Deliberate ingestion of Roundup ranging from 85 to 200 ml (of 41% solution) has resulted in death within hours of ingestion, although it has also been ingested in quantities as large as 500 ml with only mild or moderate symptoms. Consumption of over 85 ml of concentrated product is likely to cause serious symptoms in adults, including burns due to corrosive effects as well as kidney and liver damage. More severe cases lead to "respiratory distress, impaired consciousness, pulmonary edema, infiltration on chest X-ray, shock, arrhythmias, kidney failure requiring haemodialysis, metabolic acidosis, and hyperkalaemia" and death is often preceded by bradycardia and ventricular arrhythmias.

Skin exposure can cause irritation, and photocontact dermatitis has been occasionally reported. Severe skin burns are very rare. In a 2017 risk assessment, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) wrote: "There is very limited information on skin irritation in humans. Where skin irritation has been reported, it is unclear whether it is related to glyphosate or co-formulants in glyphosate-containing herbicide formulations." The ECHA concluded that available human data was insufficient to support classification for skin corrosion or irritation.

Inhalation is a minor route of exposure, but spray mist may cause oral or nasal discomfort, an unpleasant taste in the mouth, or tingling and irritation in the throat. Eye exposure may lead to mild conjunctivitis. Superficial corneal injury is possible if irrigation is delayed or inadequate.

Aquatic

Glyphosate formulations with POEA, such as Roundup, are not approved for aquatic use due to aquatic organism toxicity. Due to the presence of POEA, glyphosate formulations only allowed for terrestrial use are more toxic for amphibians and fish than glyphosate alone. Terrestrial glyphosate formulations that include the surfactants POEA and MON 0818 (75% POEA) may have negative impacts on various aquatic organisms like protozoa, mussels, crustaceans, frogs and fish. Aquatic organism exposure risk to terrestrial formulations with POEA is limited to drift or temporary water pockets. While laboratory studies can show effects of glyphosate formulations on aquatic organisms, similar observations rarely occur in the field when instructions on the herbicide label are followed.

Studies in a variety of amphibians have shown the toxicity of products containing POEA to amphibian larvae. These effects include interference with gill morphology and mortality from either the loss of osmotic stability or asphyxiation. At sub-lethal concentrations, exposure to POEA or glyphosate/POEA formulations have been associated with delayed development, accelerated development, reduced size at metamorphosis, developmental malformations of the tail, mouth, eye and head, histological indications of intersex and symptoms of oxidative stress. Glyphosate-based formulations can cause oxidative stress in bullfrog tadpoles. The use of glyphosate-based pesticides are not considered the major cause of amphibian decline, the bulk of which occurred prior to widespread use of glyphosate or in pristine tropical areas with minimal glyphosate exposure.

A 2000 review of the toxicological data on Roundup concluded that "for terrestrial uses of Roundup minimal acute and chronic risk was predicted for potentially exposed nontarget organisms". It also concluded that there were some risks to aquatic organisms exposed to Roundup in shallow water.

Bees

Roundup Ready‐To‐Use, Roundup No Glyphosate, and Roundup ProActive have all been found to cause significant mortality in bumblebees when sprayed directly on them. It has been hypothesized that this is due to surfactants in the formulations blocking the tracheal system of the bees.

Carcinogenicity

There is limited evidence that human cancer risk might increase as a result of occupational exposure to large amounts of glyphosate, such as agricultural work, but no good evidence of such a risk from home use, such as in domestic gardening. The consensus among national pesticide regulatory agencies and scientific organizations is that labeled uses of glyphosate have demonstrated no evidence of human carcinogenicity. Organizations such as the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues and the European Commission, Canadian Pest Management Regulatory Agency, and the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment have concluded that there is no evidence that glyphosate poses a carcinogenic or genotoxic risk to humans. The final assessment of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority in 2017 was that "glyphosate does not pose a carcinogenic risk to humans". The EPA has evaluated the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate multiple times since 1986. In 1986, glyphosate was initially classified as Group C: "Possible Human Carcinogen", but later recommended as Group D: "Not Classifiable as to Human Carcinogenicity" due to lack of statistical significance in previously examined rat tumor studies. In 1991, it was classified as Group E: "Evidence of Non-Carcinogenicity for Humans", and in 2015 and 2017, "Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans".

One international scientific organization, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), classified glyphosate in Group 2A, "probably carcinogenic to humans" in 2015. The variation in classification between this agency and others has been attributed to "use of different data sets" and "methodological differences in the evaluation of the available evidence". In 2017, California environmental regulators listed glyphosate as “known to the state to cause cancer.” The state's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment made the decision based in part on the report from the IARC. State Proposition 65 requires the state office to add substances the international agency deems carcinogenic in humans or laboratory animals to a state list of cancer-causing items.

Legal

This section relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this section by adding secondary or tertiary sources. (December 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In the ten months following Bayer's June 2018 acquisition of Monsanto, its stock lost 46% of its value because of investor apprehension concerning the 11,200 lawsuits filed against its subsidiary. As of 2023, around 165,000 claims have been made against Bayer, mostly alleging that Roundup had caused cancer. Bayer has settled tens of thousands of those claims and has agreed to pay billions in damages, but, as of 2023, more than 50,000 similar claims were still pending. In December 2023, Bayer won a case against a claim that Roundup had caused a man's cancer. In a statement they said the outcome was "consistent with the evidence in this case that Roundup does not cause cancer and is not responsible for the plaintiff's illness". At that time, Bayer had previously won 10 of 15 such cases.

Most cases claiming injury from Roundup are based on a failure-to-warn theory of liability, meaning Monsanto is liable for a plaintiff's injury because it failed to warn the plaintiff that Roundup can cause cancer. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2021, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in early 2024, held that such state-law failure to warn claims were not preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA"). In August 2024, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that FIFRA does preempt state-law failure to warn claims involving Roundup, expressly recognizing that its holding conflicts with that of the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits. This conflict among the Third, Ninth and Eleventh Circuit creates a heightened potential that the United States Supreme Court will review the Third Circuit's decision so that the Supreme Court can resolve the conflict among the Courts of Appeals.

Cancer cases

As of October 30, 2019, there were over 42,000 plaintiffs who said that glyphosate herbicides caused their cancer. After the IARC classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans" in March 2015, many state and federal lawsuits were filed in the United States. Early on, over 300 of them were consolidated into a multidistrict litigation called In re: RoundUp Products Liability.

On August 10, 2018, Dewayne Johnson, who has non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, was awarded $289 million in damages (later cut to $78 million on appeal then reduced to $21 million after another appeal) after a jury in San Francisco found that Monsanto had failed to adequately warn consumers of cancer risks posed by the herbicide. Johnson had routinely used two different glyphosate formulations in his work as a groundskeeper, RoundUp and another Monsanto product called Ranger Pro. The jury's verdict addressed the question of whether Monsanto knowingly failed to warn consumers that RoundUp could be harmful, but not whether RoundUp causes cancer. Court documents from the case alleged the company's efforts to influence scientific research via ghostwriting.

In January 2019, Costco decided to stop carrying Roundup or other glyphosate-based herbicides. The decision was reportedly influenced in part by the public court cases.

In March 2019, a man was awarded $80 million (later cut to $26 million on appeal) in a lawsuit claiming Roundup was a substantial factor in his cancer. U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria stated that a punitive award was appropriate because the evidence "easily supported a conclusion that Monsanto was more concerned with tamping down safety inquiries and manipulating public opinion than it was with ensuring its product is safe." Chhabria stated that there was evidence on both sides as to whether glyphosate causes cancer, and that the behavior of Monsanto showed "a lack of concern about the risk that its product might be carcinogenic."

On May 13, 2019, a jury in California ordered Bayer to pay a couple $2 billion in damages (later cut to $87 million on appeal) after finding that the company had failed to adequately inform consumers of the possible carcinogenicity of Roundup. On December 19, 2019, it was announced that Timothy Litzenburg, the lawyer for the RoundUp Virginia plaintiffs had been charged with extortion after offering to stop searching for more plaintiffs if he was paid a $200 million consulting fee by a manufacturer of glyphosate. Litzenburg and his partner Daniel Kincheloe pleaded guilty to the charges and they were sentenced to two and one years in prison respectively.

In June 2020, Bayer agreed to settle over a hundred thousand Roundup lawsuits, agreeing to pay $8.8 to $9.6 billion to settle those claims, and $1.5 billion for any future claims. The settlement does not include three cases that have already gone to jury trials and are being appealed. However the settlement was not allowed to cover future cases.

False advertising

In 1996, Monsanto was accused of false and misleading advertising of glyphosate products, prompting a lawsuit by the New York State attorney general. Monsanto had made claims that its spray-on glyphosate based herbicides, including Roundup, were safer than table salt and "practically non-toxic" to mammals, birds, and fish, "environmentally friendly", and "biodegradable". Citing avoidance of costly litigation, Monsanto settled the case, admitting no wrongdoing, and agreeing to remove the offending advertising claims in New York State.

Environmental and consumer rights campaigners brought a case in France in 2001 accusing Monsanto of presenting Roundup as "biodegradable" and claiming that it "left the soil clean" after use; glyphosate, Roundup's main ingredient, was classed by the European Union as "dangerous for the environment" and "toxic for aquatic organisms". In January 2007, Monsanto was convicted of false advertising and fined 15,000 euros. The result was confirmed in 2009.

On 27 March 2020 Bayer settled claims in a proposed class action alleging that it falsely advertised that the active ingredient in Roundup Weed & Grass Killer only affects plants with a $39.5 million deal that included changing the labels on its products.

In June 2023, Bayer reached a $6.9 million settlement agreement with the New York attorney general, settling false advertising allegations concerning the safety of Roundup.

Falsification of test results

Some tests originally conducted on glyphosate by contractors were later found to have been fraudulent, along with tests conducted on other pesticides. Concerns were raised about toxicology tests conducted by Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories in the 1970s and Craven Laboratories was found to have fraudulently analysed samples for residues of glyphosate in 1991. Monsanto has stated that the studies have since been repeated.

Ban in France

In January 2019, Roundup Pro 360 was banned in France following a Lyon court ruling that regulator ANSES had not given due weight to safety concerns when they approved the product in March 2017. The ban went into effect immediately. The court's decision cited research by the IARC, based in Lyon.

Use with genetically modified crops

Main article: Roundup Ready

Monsanto first developed Roundup in the 1970s. End-users initially used it in a similar way to paraquat and diquat – as a non-selective herbicide. Application of glyphosate-based herbicides to row crops resulted in problems with crop damage and kept them from being widely used for this purpose. In the United States, use of Roundup experienced rapid growth following the commercial introduction of a glyphosate-resistant soybean in 1996. "Roundup Ready" became Monsanto's trademark for its patented line of crop seeds that are resistant to Roundup. Between 1990 and 1996 sales of Roundup increased around 20% per year. As of 2015 the product was used in over 160 countries. Roundup is used most heavily on corn, soy, and cotton crops that have been genetically modified to withstand the chemical, but as of 2012 glyphosate treated approximately 5 million acres in California for crops like almond, peach, cantaloupe, onion, cherry, sweet corn, and citrus, although the product is only applied directly to certain varieties of sweet corn.

See also

References

  1. Domonoske, Camila (June 4, 2018). "Monsanto No More: Agri-Chemical Giant's Name Dropped In Bayer Acquisition". NPR. Retrieved August 17, 2018.
  2. "The debate over whether Monsanto is a corporate sinner or saint". The Economist. November 19, 2009. Retrieved November 20, 2009.
  3. Cavallaro, Matt (June 26, 2009). "The Seeds Of A Monsanto Short Play". Forbes. Archived from the original on July 3, 2009. Retrieved July 11, 2009.
  4. Jack Kaskey (May 1, 2019). "Scotts Miracle-Gro Jumps Most in Decade on Pot-Supplies Rebound". Bloomberg.
  5. ^ "For the homeowner: Roundup® for Lawns?" (PDF). Nebraska Turfgrass Science. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
  6. ^ Frank, Kevin; Hathaway, Aaron (March 31, 2017). "What's the difference between Roundup and Roundup For Lawns?". MSU Extension. Michigan State University Extension. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
  7. US3799758A, John, Franz, "N-phosphonomethyl-glycine phytotoxicant compositions", issued 1974-03-26 
  8. Benbrook, Charles M. (February 2, 2016). "Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally". Environmental Sciences Europe. 28 (1): 3. doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0. ISSN 2190-4715. PMC 5044953. PMID 27752438.
  9. "California Product/Label Database". Cdpr.ca.gov. Retrieved August 22, 2010.
  10. Cohen, Patricia (June 24, 2020). "Roundup Maker to Pay $10 Billion to Settle Cancer Suits". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved June 25, 2020.
  11. ^ "Bayer wins latest Roundup cancer trial, ending losing streak". Reuters. December 23, 2023.
  12. "Pesticide Registration Manual | Pesticide Registration | US EPA". March 4, 2013. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
  13. "Adjuvants for Enhancing Herbicide Performance". extension.psu.edu. Penn State Extension. Retrieved August 15, 2018.
  14. "Measuring POEA, a Surfactant Mixture in Herbicide Formulations". U.S. Geological Survey. Archived from the original on October 7, 2015. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
  15. ^ Gary L. Diamond and Patrick R. Durkin February 6, 1997, under contract from the United States Department of Agriculture. Effects of Surfactants on the Toxicity of Glyphosate, with Specific Reference to RODEO
  16. ^ "SS-AGR-104 Safe Use of Glyphosate-Containing Products in Aquatic and Upland Natural Areas" (PDF). University of Florida. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 3, 2007. Retrieved August 13, 2018.
  17. ^ Mann RM, Hyne RV, Choung CB, Wilson SP (2009). "Amphibians and agricultural chemicals: Review of the risks in a complex environment". Environmental Pollution. 157 (11): 2903–2927. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.015. PMID 19500891.
  18. ^ Van Bruggen, A.H.C.; He, M.M.; Shin, K.; Mai, V.; Jeong, K.C.; Finckh, M. R.; Morris, J.G. (March 1, 2018). "Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate". Science of the Total Environment. 616–617: 255–268. Bibcode:2018ScTEn.616..255V. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 29117584.
  19. Effects of Surfactants on the Toxicity of Glyphosate, with Specific Reference to Rodeo (PDF), Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. (SERA), retrieved August 20, 2018
  20. Glyphosate: Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment (PDF), Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc.(SERA), retrieved August 20, 2018
  21. ^ Bradberry SM, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA (2004). "Glyphosate poisoning". Toxicological Reviews. 23 (3): 159–67. doi:10.2165/00139709-200423030-00003. PMID 15862083. S2CID 5636017.
  22. ^ Rolando, Carol; Baillie, Brenda; Thompson, Dean; Little, Keith (June 12, 2017). "The Risks Associated with Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Use in Planted Forests". Forests. 8 (6): 208. doi:10.3390/f8060208.
  23. Sribanditmongkol P, Jutavijittum P, Pongraveevongsa P, Wunnapuk K, Durongkadech P (September 2012). "Pathological and toxicological findings in glyphosate-surfactant herbicide fatality: a case report". The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 33 (3): 234–7. doi:10.1097/PAF.0b013e31824b936c. PMID 22835958. S2CID 3457850.
  24. Williams, Gary M.; Kroes, Robert; Munro, Ian C. (April 2000). "Safety Evaluation and Risk Assessment of the Herbicide Roundup and Its Active Ingredient, Glyphosate, for Humans". Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 31 (2): 117–165. doi:10.1006/rtph.1999.1371. PMID 10854122. S2CID 19831028.
  25. Talbot AR, Shiaw MH, Huang JS, Yang SF, Goo TS, Wang SH, Chen CL, Sanford TR (January 1991). "Acute poisoning with a glyphosate-surfactant herbicide ('Roundup'): a review of 93 cases". Human & Experimental Toxicology. 10 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1177/096032719101000101. PMID 1673618. S2CID 8028945.
  26. Committee of Risk Assessment Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at EU level of glyphosate (ISO); N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine
  27. ^ "Glyphosate" (PDF). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. 112. International Agency for Research on Cancer. August 11, 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 12, 2018. Retrieved July 31, 2019.
  28. Wagner N, Reichenbecher W, Teichmann H, Tappeser B, Lötters S (August 2013). "Questions concerning the potential impact of glyphosate-based herbicides on amphibians". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 32 (8): 1688–700. doi:10.1002/etc.2268. PMID 23637092. S2CID 36417341.
  29. JP Giesy, KR Solomon, S Dobson (2000). "Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment for Roundup Herbicide". Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 167: 35-120
  30. Straw, Edward A.; Carpentier, Edward N.; Brown, Mark J. F. (April 6, 2021). "Roundup causes high levels of mortality following contact exposure in bumble bees". Journal of Applied Ecology. 58 (6): 1167–1176. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13867.
  31. "Food Controversies—Pesticides and organic foods". Cancer Research UK. 2016. Archived from the original on February 6, 2017. Retrieved November 28, 2017.
  32. ^ Tarazona, Jose V.; Court-Marques, Daniele; Tiramani, Manuela; Reich, Hermine; Pfeil, Rudolf; Istace, Frederique; Crivellente, Federica (April 3, 2017). "Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC". Archives of Toxicology. 91 (8): 2723–2743. doi:10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5. PMC 5515989. PMID 28374158.
  33. "The BfR has finalised its draft report for the re-evaluation of glyphosate - BfR". Retrieved August 18, 2018.
  34. Guston, David; Ludlow, Karinne (2010). "Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority". Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4129-6987-1.
  35. OCSPP (December 18, 2017). "EPA Releases Draft Risk Assessments for Glyphosate" (Announcements and Schedules). US EPA. Retrieved August 18, 2018.
  36. "Revised Glyphosate Issue Paper: Evaluation of Carcinogenic Potential". EPA. pp. 12–13. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
  37. "How chemicals are added to the Proposition 65 list". oehha.ca.gov. Retrieved January 21, 2024.
  38. Anaïs Moutot (March 28, 2019). "Glyphosate: nouveau revers judiciare pour Bayer". Les Echos (in French). Retrieved March 30, 2019.
  39. "Schaffner v. Monsanto Corporation" (PDF). Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals. August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 17, 2024.
  40. Stempel (August 16, 2024). "Bayer wins US legal victory against Roundup cancer claims; shares surge". Reuters. Retrieved August 17, 2024.
  41. Feeley (August 16, 2024). "Bayer surges after Roundup appeal wins in Philadelphia court". Blomberg Law. Retrieved August 17, 2024.
  42. "Bayer's Roundup Headache Grows as Plaintiffs Pile Into Court". Bloomberg News. October 30, 2019. Retrieved October 31, 2019.
  43. "IARC Monograph on Glyphosate". International Agency for Research on Cancer. Archived from the original on July 12, 2022. Retrieved September 4, 2023.
  44. "Monsanto's Cancer Fight Judge Pictures Weed Killer Showers". Bloomberg News. March 14, 2018. Retrieved August 17, 2018.
  45. Sullivan, Emily. "Groundskeeper Accepts Reduced $78 Million Award In Monsanto Cancer Suit". National Public Radio. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  46. Egelko, Bob (July 21, 2020). "Award to Vallejo groundskeeper in Monsanto cancer case slashed again - verdict upheld". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
  47. "Monsanto ordered to pay $289 million in world's first Roundup..." Reuters. August 11, 2018. Retrieved August 17, 2018.
  48. "Weedkiller 'doesn't cause cancer' - Bayer". BBC News. August 11, 2018. Retrieved August 11, 2018.
  49. Johnston, Gretel (August 11, 2018). "Dying cancer patient awarded $395m in Monsanto Roundup case". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved August 18, 2018.
  50. Judkins, Donna R; Wente, Stephen P (June 17, 2020), Draft Ecological Risk Assessment for the Registration Review of Dichlorvos, Naled, and Trichlorfon, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, p. 33
  51. Ebersole, Rene (August 17, 2018). "Monsanto Just Lost a Case Linking Its Weed Killer to Cancer". The Nation. ISSN 0027-8378. Archived from the original on August 17, 2018. Retrieved August 18, 2018.
  52. Hakim, Danny (August 1, 2018). "Monsanto Emails Raise Issue of Influencing Research on Roundup Weed Killer". The New York Times. Retrieved October 13, 2018.
  53. "Costco Will Reportedly Remove Roundup from Stores After $2 Billion Awarded to Couple Who Claimed Weed Killer Caused Their Cancer". People magazine. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
  54. ^ "Judge Reduces $80M Award In Roundup Case; Cancer Patient, Monsanto Both Consider Appeal". San Francisco: KPIX-TV. Associated Press. July 15, 2019. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
  55. Gonzales, Richard (March 29, 2019). "Jury Awards $80 Million In Damages In Roundup Weed Killer Cancer Trial". NPR. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  56. Wolfson, Andrew (March 28, 2019). "Louisville lawyer wins $80M verdict against Monsanto over weedkiller Roundup". The Courier-Journal. Louisville, Kentucky. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  57. Telford, Taylor (July 26, 2019). "Judge cuts $2 billion award for couple with cancer to $86.7 million in Roundup lawsuit". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
  58. "Bayer's $2 Billion Roundup Damages Boost Pressure to Settle". Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg News. May 13, 2019. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
  59. "Roundup suit lawyer accused of $200 million extortion plot". CBS News. December 18, 2019.
  60. "Lawyer for Roundup plaintiffs charged with extortion".
  61. "DOJ charges Roundup plaintiffs' lawyer in $200 million alleged extortion scheme". Reuters. December 19, 2019.
  62. "Virginia lawyers get prison terms for $200M Roundup extortion scheme". Westlaw Today. Reuters Legal. September 18, 2020. Retrieved December 1, 2021.
  63. Bayer To Pay More Than $10 Billion To Resolve Cancer Lawsuits Over Weedkiller Roundup
  64. mindfully.org. "Attorney General of the State of New York. Consumer Frauds and Protection Bureau. Environmental Protection Bureau. 1996. In the matter of Monsanto Company, respondent. Assurance of discontinuance pursuant to executive law § 63(15). New York, NY, Nov". Mindfully.org. Archived from the original on July 6, 2009. Retrieved August 22, 2010.
  65. ^ Talbot, AR; Shiaw, MH; Huang, JS; Yang, SF (November 25, 1996). "Monsanto Agrees to Modify Roundup Ads in New York State". Associated Press. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
  66. "Monsanto guilty in 'false ad' row". BBC News. October 15, 2009. Retrieved October 16, 2009.
  67. "Monsanto définitivement condamné pour "publicité mensongère" à propos du Round Up" [Monsanto finally convicted for 'false advertising' about the Round Up]. Le Monde (in French). Paris. October 15, 2009.
  68. "Monsanto To Pay $39M In Roundup False Ad Class Settlement - Law360". www.law360.com. Retrieved March 30, 2020.
  69. Stempel, Jonathan (June 15, 2023). "Bayer reaches $6.9 million settlement with New York over Roundup safety claims". Reuters. Retrieved June 21, 2023.
  70. "Summary of the IBT review program". U.S. EPA Office of pesticides and Toxic Substances. July 1983.
  71. Keith Schneider (March 2, 1991). "U.S. Seeks to Learn if Tests On Pesticides Were Falsified". New York Times. Retrieved September 20, 2018.
  72. "Testing Fraud: IBT and Craven Labs" (PDF). Backgrounder. Monsanto. June 2005. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 8, 2010.
  73. "Weedkiller Roundup banned in France after court ruling". France 24. January 16, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  74. "French court cancels Monsanto weedkiller permit on safety grounds". Reuters. January 15, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  75. Duke, Stephen O. (2018). "The history and current status of glyphosate". Pest Management Science. 74 (5): 1027–1034. doi:10.1002/ps.4652. PMID 28643882. S2CID 4408706. Retrieved August 20, 2018.
  76. "Top-selling herbicide not close to withering". Wall Street Journal. January 8, 1996. Archived from the original on August 13, 2018. Retrieved August 12, 2018.
  77. "What Do We Really Know About Roundup Weed Killer?". National Geographic News. April 23, 2015. Archived from the original on August 13, 2018. Retrieved August 13, 2018.
  78. "What Do We Really Know About Roundup Weed Killer?". National Geographic News. April 23, 2015. Archived from the original on August 13, 2018. Retrieved July 13, 2020. some five million acres in California were treated with glyphosate in 2012 to grow almonds, peaches, onions, cantaloupe, cherries, sweet corn, citrus, grapes, and other edible crops.

Further reading

  • Baccara, Mariagiovanna, et al. ”Monsanto's Roundup”, NYU Stern School of Business: August 2001, Revised July 14, 2003.
  • Pease W S et al. (1993) ”Preventing pesticide-related illness in California agriculture: Strategies and priorities”. Environmental Health Policy Program Report. Berkeley, CA: University of California. School of Public Health. California Policy Seminar.
  • Wang Y, Jaw C and Chen Y (1994) “Accumulation of 2,4-D and glyphosate in fish and water hyaacinth”. Water Air Soil Pollute. 74:397–403

External links

Categories:
Roundup (herbicide): Difference between revisions Add topic