Misplaced Pages

User talk:Gwen Gale: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:33, 1 July 2008 view sourceLudwigs2 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,240 edits →ID request: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:46, 25 December 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,698 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Gwen Gale/archive22) (bot 
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- VERY IMPORTANT! READ THIS! DO NOT POST YOUR MESSAGE ABOVE THIS LINE. POST YOUR NEW MESSAGE ONLY AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE, OR USE THE "NEW SECTION" TAB AT THE TOP OF THIS WEB PAGE. CLICK ON THE "NEW SECTION" TAB NOW! :) Please post all messages AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE and if we're already talking about something please keep it in the same thread. NEVER EVER try to copy-paste old threads from my archives onto this page unless you CANNY know what you're doing (and there is wontedly no need to do this), thanks -->
⚫ ]<br><big>Are you here because I deleted your article? ] to find out why.</big>
⚫ <br clear="all" />
<noinclude>{{User:MiszaBot/config <noinclude>{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 5 |counter = 22
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(1d) |algo = old(1d)
|archive = User talk:Gwen Gale/archive%(counter)d |archive = User talk:Gwen Gale/archive%(counter)d
}} }}
{| cellpadding=3 cellspacing=0 style="float:right;text-align:center; border:solid 1px black; background:rgb(252,254,255);margin=5" {| cellpadding=2 cellspacing=0 style="float:right;text-align:center; border:solid 1px white; background:rgb(252,254,255);margin=5"
| align=center|Talk archives'''<br>] | align=center|]
|- |-
| ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] | align=left|<big>bygone</big><br>] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] <br> ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] <br> ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
| |
|} |}
<!-- <br> greeting -->
<!-- ]<br clear="all" />
<big><font color="green">merry</font> <font color="red">yule</font> <font color="purple">and</font> <font color="orange">a</font> <font color="pink">gear</font> <font color="yellow">new</font> <font color="blue">year</font> --><!-- <font color="red">&hearts;</font> --><!-- </big><br><br> -->
<br><br><br>
]<big>If I left a post on your talk page...</big><br>
Please answer there. ], no worries.<br><br>
⚫ <!--]<big>Are you here because I deleted your article?</big><br>] to find out why. -->
<!--
<inputbox> <inputbox>
type=comment type=comment
bgcolor=#e9f5ff bgcolor=#e9f5ff
default=User talk:Gwen Gale default=User talk:Gwen Gale
buttonlabel=Write a new note for Gwen buttonlabel="Write a new note for Gwen"
</inputbox> </inputbox> -->
⚫ <br clear="all" />

<!-- DO NOT POST YOUR MESSAGE HERE. Please post all messages AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE, in a thread about a topic we're already talking about together or use the message button at the top of this page, thanks --> <!-- DO NOT POST YOUR MESSAGE HERE. Please post all messages AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE and if we're already talking about something please keep it in the same thread. NEVER EVER try to copy-paste old threads from my archives onto this page unless you CANNY know what you're doing (and there is wontedly no need to do this), thanks -->

== Help... >_<' ==

* ]

Hi :)

I noticed that the page on the Sweeney Todd Rewrite was deleted. I'm really sorry - I removed all the text because the person who actually wrote the work did not know I had made a page about it - and I was scared that someone would copy their work and it would be all my fault... =_=' I've told the author about it now and she didn't mind anyway - but could I put the article back up again once I've improved it a little, please?

Thank you,
Miss Todd <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::Hey. I've userfied what you wrote (and then blanked) at ]. I cannot tell if this is about an historical event or fiction and moreover, there are no sources. I would suggest you work on this more before trying to recreate the article, because it would likely be deleted again. All the best, ] (]) 19:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

== I would like to rewrite a deleted page please ==

Hello Gwen

I would like to take another crack at writing an article for SAWA Global that is less "advertisement like". Can you please provide access to the page you deleted so I can try and write a more objective and informative page?

Thanks
Gayle Moss
] (]) 19:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Sawaglobal
SAWA Global

:::Hi! First we have to fix your username, I've left a note on your talk page. All the best, ] (]) 19:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

== Don't agree ==

I've been editing that article and archiving there for nearly a year, I think I know what I'm doing. New arrivals to that article with challenges and proposals that are out of alignment with Misplaced Pages's core content policies -WP:NPOV, WP:V and WP:NOR- are wasting their time and that of others if they continue to ignore content policy. So here's the time-honored drill there, used by admins and regular editors there alike for several years: Those making objections and suggestions ignore content policies should expect a pointer to the appropriate policies; giving such a pointer is *not* a form of rudeness, but meant to help. To respect their own time and that of others they should take the time to read and understand the policies before re-raising the issue. Those who have been pointed to policy and yet continue to argue the same matter ad nauseum without the benefit of being supported by policy can expect to not get the response they are looking for and have their discussions prematurely archived. Again, this is not rudeness or incivility; it is out of respect for the time and patience of all the editors participating. There's no Misplaced Pages policy that allows for endless raising and re-raising objections to content that is well-aligned with content policy and there is one against doing that, WP:DE, and it's better for all if things don't get to that point. That's why we archive discussions that ignore or are ignorant of content policy. ] (]) 21:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

::I think we only have a disagreement on how to get to the same goal. If a user can't follow sourcing policies, that's indeed disruption, which is ''very'' blockable. Let me know if you need help, I'm wholly uninvolved with ID. ] (]) 21:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

== southern datum ==

You were admirably restrained, I thought. ] (]) 23:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Yup. Agree with that block, and I was also impressed with your restraint. Cheers, ] ] 23:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

== Meanwhile, Noam awaits you... ==

If you have a moment, please have a gander at . Thanks. ] (]) 01:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

::Methinks I see OR (never mind that editor's no linguist). ] (]) 06:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

:::''that editor's no linguist'' You noticed that, too? heh heh. I'm sure the 50+ year-old edifice of modern linguistics will tumble to the ground if this fellow just blows. ] (]) 11:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==

The result is NOT delete, but no consensus. ] that you refer is not also a policy but just an essay. You're a new admin and I dont' really think that you're doing well on this. You need to explain your deletion reason concisely. I also want the content in my talk page. Regards. --] (]) 15:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

::Such kind words! Since there is no way I can be neutral about this after that outburst (which came only seconds after I closed the discussion), please take it to ], thanks. ] (]) 16:02, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
:That is my intention. Still, you fail to give ''your closing rationale'' at all. --] (]) 16:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
::You can take the lack of a closing rationale as the closing admin's agreement with the nomination statement. I'm sorry you're unhappy about this, I do suggest you take it to ] and all the best to you. ] (]) 16:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
:::Done, ]. Then, you would know that the nominator's rationale is ''not true'' regarding that "This word has been expired in Korea.". Two days ago, one of the tree big television networks in South Korea featured the term, 'myungbaksanseong' as a closing comment and not to mention of other medias as well. I will look forward to your input at ]. Regards. --] (]) 16:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

::::(ec) Ouch. Gwen may be relatively new as an admin, but your opinion of her performance puts you in a distinct minority. To the contrary, the project would benefit greatly from more admins like her.
::::I didn't participate (or even see) that AfD when it was active, but I just reviewed it, and I agree with Gwen's conclusion. Regardless of the number of !votes, there were more reasons put forth to delete than to keep, and the arguments advanced for deletion were stronger (being rooted in policies). Possibly her summary would have benefitted from mentioning ] and ], but the close itself was perfectly valid. <s>Of course you can always try DRV if you disagree.</s> after the edit conflict, I see you have done just that. ] <font color ="green">]</font > 17:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

With over 1500 admins at Misplaced Pages, some of these AfDs still wind up in backlogs for many days because they're often ''not easy'' to close and most admins don't like getting talk page messages like the above. Truth be told I think the term may be a bit too new for encyclopedic notability. Let time tell. ] (]) 17:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

:I narrow down the mention of her ability as an admin to just ''this case'', because the first one stemmed from my immediate sentiment toward her closing without proper rationale. Even though I did not participate in her two RFA, I read through the pages and acknowledge her contributions before her becoming an admin. Well, I'm not sure that I'm a member of such the minor group, and your (Doc Tropics) post-analysis would affect my thought on this. Anyway, feel free to express your thought and interpretation on related policies at ]. Thanks. --] (]) 17:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

== Revisiting Wonder Woman ==

Hello, I was wondering if you could go through with since my suggestion appears unopposed and there was an invitation to discussion without result. Please let me know if there are any issues! —<font face="Palatino Linotype">]</font> (] • ]) - 16:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

== ID request ==


== ''The Signpost'': 24 December 2024 ==
Gwen,


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2024-12-24}} </div><!--Volume 20, Issue 18--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 00:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (]) --></div></div>
I've been trying to be very careful to have a fair discussion on ID, even to the point of specifying that I will not continue it past two or three days, and that it can be archived after that. however, Hrfan keeps refactoring part of the discussion. I realize that your sympathies lie more with Hrfan than with me, but in the interests of calm, intelligent discussion, could you please ask him to stop and let me restore the argument for the brief period it will take to finish the discussion? --] 17:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1263792399 -->

Latest revision as of 16:46, 25 December 2024

bygone
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24




If I left a post on your talk page...

Please answer there. I'll see it, no worries.


The Signpost: 24 December 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)