| Revision as of 01:01, 2 July 2008 editElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits Formal notification of Israel-Palestine articles ArbCom case← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:20, 5 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,645 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Lapsed Pacifist/Archive 5) (bot | ||
| (404 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 75K | |maxarchivesize = 75K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 5 | ||
| |algo = old(90d) | |algo = old(90d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Lapsed Pacifist/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Lapsed Pacifist/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| {{archives|auto=yes}} | {{archives|auto=yes}} | ||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| == Image copyright problem with ] == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> | |||
| ] | |||
| '''Hi Lapsed Pacifist!'''<br /> | |||
| We thank you for uploading ], but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a ], it may be ] by an ]. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a ''']''' to the ]. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| == '']'' == | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks so much for your cooperation.<br /><small>This message is from a ].</small> --] (]) 21:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| re https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/search/?title=The_Politics_of_Heroin_in_Southeast_Asia&curid=4478626&diff=326194225&oldid=324636244 : It's been a while since I read it, but I recall the heroin use among US troops was was affecting ] because heavy use contributed to physical issues. Does that really fall under 'morale'? --] ] 18:27 ] ] (GMT) | |||
| == Cats == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| FYI, Tánaistí of Ireland is NOT a subcat of TDs. ] (]) 02:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Image copyright problem with Image:S6300069.JPG == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| ] | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] <small>''<sup> ]</sup> <sub>]</sub>'' </small> 16:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a ''']''' to the ]. | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation. ] (]) 14:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#2001 New York attacks}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 15:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image source problem with File:Shell to Sea poster.gif== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. | |||
| This image is a ], containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. | |||
| == Soapboxing == | |||
| While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall ] status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. | |||
| (Friendly suggestion.) I fully appreciate that you obviously have a social conscience, but please try to avoid editorialising content and using Misplaced Pages as a soapbox. You know this already, but Misplaced Pages is not an indymedia style outlet. It's supposed to be neutral and factual. If an event or action involves a police force using physical force, just call it that - don't apply a POV term like "extrajudicial punishment". Let the facts speak for themselves. Otherwise you run the risk of losing credibility as a balanced editor, as does Misplaced Pages as a balanced research tool. Cheers. ] (]) 11:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I totally agree with ], Lapsed Pacifist has lost the run of themselves as regards as pretence towards neutrality. Blantant POV pushing is this editors hallmark. Doesn't provide any citations for the POV and when challenged turns aggressive against other editors. It's just not acceptable on wikipedia. Start your own blog and stop trying to force wikipedia to become a mouthpiece for your opinions. ] (]) 13:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described in ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 16:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)'''. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-dw no source-notice --> ]] 16:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Michael McDowell == | |||
| You reverted 3 times on 30 May, just look at the history. Which part of wait until a full discussion has been had by all. do you not understand? ] (]) 13:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :This getting ridiculous. Shall we agree to a truce? I propose we start a topic on Irish Wikipedians notice board about what articles should or shouldn't go in the TD category. Brownhairedgirl has gone on a wikibreak so no need to wait on her anymore, just everyone's opinion from the wider community. Until a consensus has been reached, I propose no further removal from the TD category; if the outcome of the discussion is to leave the cat as is then fine by me and if the outcome is to depopulate the cat then a bot will be assigned to do all 733 articles at once. Is this acceptable? ] (]) 13:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::You won't win any prizes for politeness either. There is no point in further discussion since you have already pre-conceived notions which you try to foist on the community. If you are going to de-populate the category of individual TDs articles, then do it properly. Get a bot to do it, don't do it piecemeal and have it partially populated. ] (]) 01:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ETA Categories == | |||
| You may disagree with current categorisation but ignoring the ongoing discussion, constantly inventing new categories and removing the ones that are in there isn't the way to move forward. You have already been asked to leave the article alone while we discuss it on talk yet you continue to ignore these requests. Similarly, whatever is the point in replacing four descriptive NPOV categories such as Organisations designated as terrorist in the UK by a new invented omnibus category Organisations designated as terrorist in the UK, Canada, USA and the EU which you've just set up? There may well be a case for renaming the parent category organisations designated as terrorist by adding "by governments or supranational organisations" but as has been pointed out to you by at least four editors, it makes no sense to remove the individual entries. Please wait and discuss on talk rather than wasting peoples time. ] (]) 09:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Lapsed Pacifist, many people disagree with you, and no one agrees, i.e. you are the '''only one''' that changes the categories. Please stop doing it. ] (]) 09:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration enforcement == | |||
| I would like to notify you of the following . --] (]) 14:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: Regarding the above report, I have blocked you for 24hrs for violation of of remedy 1 of ]: ''Lapsed Pacifist is banned indefinitely from articles which relate to the conflict in Northern Ireland. The ban is intended to include any page in Misplaced Pages which Lapsed Pacifist engages in a dispute related in any way to the conflict in Northern Ireland.'' | |||
| :: You have been editing long enough to know that using the word "terrorist" in relation to an Irish/British conflict is likely to inflame. Moreover, just because this particular body existed prior to the modern period known as The Troubles, does not preclude it from being part of "the conflict in Northern Ireland". On the expiry of this block, my suggestion to you is to interpret the boundaries of the remedy a bit more liberally. If you appreciate that, and this was a genuine misunderstanding, you may request an unblock. (By the way, you might consider archiving your talk page. It is cripplingly large at the moment.) ]<font color="black">e</font>] 17:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sure the Tans wernt ever even in Northern Ireland and definately not around during "the Troubles". Seems unfair.--] (]) 17:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: The ban has nothing to do with The Troubles specifically, but the Irish/British conflict over independence. I don't think I'm making a big jump interpret the "Northern Ireland conflict" to include that. If LP genuinely feels the Tans have nothing whatsoever to do with the Irish/British conflict then he can request an unblock and get a second opinion. If he made a genuine mistake he can acknowledge that and request an unblock. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 17:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Thats not how I read it. Can you show me where it says he cant edit anything with respect to "Irish/British conflict over independence" because ] it only talks about the O6. {{unsigned|Vintagekits}} | |||
| ::::: Obviously our interpretation differs then. I would suggest we leave it as that, considering condition 8 of your own probation. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 21:05, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == {{tl|Scotland-newspaper stub}} == | |||
| Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at ], at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at ]. This is partly in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies, and partly so that those who regularly deal with stub articles know what stub types are likely to need re-sorting soon. Your new stub type is currently listed at ] - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ]...''<small><font color="#008822">]</font></small>'' 02:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2008 == | |||
| ] Please stop. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles{{#if:Jack Bauer|, as you did to ]}}, you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> ] (]) 12:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Controversial page moves == | |||
| Lapsed Pacifist, you seem to be moving a lot of articles lately, and some of the moves seem to be controversial. Can I ask you to please slow down a bit? Per ], moves should only be done if they are not opposed. If there is any chance that a move might be controversial, it is better to first suggest the move at the talkpage. If no one disagrees after a few days, then go ahead and move the page. If there ''is'' disagreement though, then it will be incumbent upon you to build consensus for a move, and to let a neutral party make the decision as to whether or not there is consensus. Thanks, ]]] 17:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : P.S. Your talkpage is awfully long, over 140K, and some people's browsers start having trouble with anything over 32K. If it's alright with you, can I set up an auto-archive bot? That will automatically archive any threads older than a certain amount (such as 30 days), and then you won't have to worry about it. :) --]]] 17:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: Archive bot setup, with 90-day cutoff, as requested. These things generally run on about a 24-hour cycle, but I don't know when the next "pulse" is. You should definitely see it kick in by tomorrow. If you have any questions, let me know! :) --]]] 18:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Nuclear weapons and Israel == | |||
| ] Please stop. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles{{#if:Nuclear weapons and Israel|, as you did to ]}}, you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> -- ] (]) 13:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Adding information that is not cited is a violation of wikipedia's rules against ] and ]. Please only add properly cited material. Thank you. -- ] (]) 02:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration Enforcement == | |||
| I have blocked you for 48 hours due to and your subsequent revert to replace the material. The restriction the ArbCom placed on your clearly indicates that you are no longer to edit articles about the conflict or make controversial edits about the conflict, full stop. Please stop trying to find ways to continue the problems that led to the case - drop the subject entirely and don't edit about it in any article. <font face="Tempus Sans ITC" color="#2B0066">] <sup>]</sup></font> 18:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == DRV of Category:British occupations == | |||
| As a participant in ], you may be interested in the ] that has been listed regarding my closure of the discussion as "no consensus". Regards, ]] 23:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Talkpage etiquette== | |||
| Lapsed Pacifist, though not required, could I ask you to please make a small change to the way that you sign your posts? Currently you keep all posts left justified, and you sign with your signature two lines before your post. This can make the reading of some discussions a bit difficult, since your signatures are non-standard. So, would you please consider indenting your posts with <nowiki>::</nowiki> marks (one colon per "tab" of indent), and signing your post on the same line as your last sentence? It would be much appreciated, and would keep discussions easier to read. Thanks, ]]] 00:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==] == | |||
| As a result of the above-named Arbitration case, the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. | |||
| --]]] 01:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:20, 5 November 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Articles for deletion nomination of Pat O'Donnell
I have nominated Pat O'Donnell, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pat O'Donnell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia
re https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/search/?title=The_Politics_of_Heroin_in_Southeast_Asia&curid=4478626&diff=326194225&oldid=324636244 : It's been a while since I read it, but I recall the heroin use among US troops was was affecting combat readiness because heavy use contributed to physical issues. Does that really fall under 'morale'? --Gwern (contribs) 18:27 16 November 2009 (GMT)
Nomination of O'Rahilly's historical model for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O'Rahilly's historical model is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/O'Rahilly's historical model until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Eddie891 Work 16:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
"2001 New York attacks" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect 2001 New York attacks has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 9 § 2001 New York attacks until a consensus is reached. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Image source problem with File:Shell to Sea poster.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Shell to Sea poster.gif.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 16:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
