Misplaced Pages

User talk:Fish and karate: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:38, 12 July 2008 editPsychobotox (talk | contribs)30 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:48, 5 January 2025 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,256 edits →Administrators' newsletter – January 2025: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{archive box|auto=yes}}
{{User talk:Neil/header}}
{{nobots}}
{{User talk:Fish and karate/header}}


== Your talk page archives ==
<!-- HEY YOU! PUT YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE! THANKS! -->


Hello! Could you please edit your older talk page archives (specifically, archives ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]) so that they don't transclude {{tl|Archive navigation}}? This template is deprecated and we're trying to clean up all uses of it before it gets deleted. Thanks! – 🌻 ] (] &#124; ]) 12:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
==Unblocking of ]==
:{{ping|Hilst}} All done, I think :) <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em">]+]</u> 14:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
::] <!-- Template:WikiThanks -->Thank you! – 🌻 ] (] &#124; ]) 14:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – November 2024 ==
Since no one told me about the discussion, or gave me a chance to give input, I feel your unblocking was premature and wrong. You need to at least wait until I had a chance to give input. Guiom did not tell me about the AN discussion, nor has anyone even tried to address my concerns. I'm not about wheel warring, but this is ridiculous. ] | ] 11:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
:For the reader: ]. ] ] 12:42, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


] from the past month (October 2024).
Thanks Neil. I've already asked him by email to try and find another username; I've also given him some advice regarding the POTD thing and asked him what the status of the discussions was regarding the removal of the watermarks. This is the second time I am involved in a wikidrama (the first time was about an emergency desysopping), I really should stay away from the AN :) Thanks again for your help. ] 14:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


]
== Great Power ==


] '''Administrator changes'''
Hey Neil, thanks for deleting the potential great powers section at the ] article. Hopefully this will stop the edit warring. None of the regular editors involved on the page could have removed without starting an edit war. --] (]) 11:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
:Fingers crossed that will resolve things. If there's any further problems let me know. ] ] 14:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
== hi ==
:] ]
it seems that "my" rfc is death so i want to know if i have recovered all my rights to edit whatever i want, like users Naval and Maurice do, or i still have your hidden block and your threatens to block me if i edit again. I want to hear from you to report it if i still have it, i think that or i am blocked or i have recovered '''all''' my rights but your hidden block it doesn't seem me ''legal'' and i will report it. thanks. --] (]) 13:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
:I never threatened to block you if you edited again. I threatened to block you if you ] again, particularly on the ] article. ] ] 13:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


] '''Oversighter changes'''
== Watermarks ==
:] ]


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
Neil, we can't be running around after a user who keeps uploading watermarked images, and remove the watermarks. Users outnumber admins by a long shot, so who is going to be following around all the watermark uploaders if we create a precedent that uploading watermarked images is entirely acceptable? It's clearly not acceptable - for instance, watermarked images are completely forbidden at ]. ] (]) 14:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
* Following a ], the ] proposal that went for a trial to refine the ] (RfA) process has been discontinued.
:Of course they are not acceptable at FPC. And of course they are not acceptable on any article. Uploading them under a license that allows us to remove them isn't that bad - as the watermarks are all in the same place on each image, I would imagine a bot could remove them. ] ] 14:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
* Following a ], ] is adopted as a policy.
::Who is going to write this bot? ] (]) 14:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
:::I don't know. "]" There's loads of clever bot operators around. ] ] 14:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
::
:::Ideally, the user we're talking about is going to re-upload all images without any watermarks. No bot will be needed. ] 14:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
::::Has the user agreed to do this? ] (]) 14:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
:::::Read ] - they are working on it. ] ] 14:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
::::::Neil, you keep confusing this user with User:Shot info and it's confoosling me in the process! It's ]. ] 14:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
:::::::Aaargh! I had no idea. Curse you Shot info! Effing flabberjackers. Fixed (and now I'll go fix all the other places I got it wrong). ] ] 14:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


] '''Technical news'''
== ] ==
* Mass deletions done with the ] tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. {{phab|T366068}}
I noticed you created this article, and that it's tagged for proposed deletion. Just thought you should know, in case you want to defend. ] (]) 15:06, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks. I took the five seconds the nominator should have taken and added five references to the article. ] ] 15:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


] '''Arbitration'''
== ] ==
* {{noping|RoySmith}}, {{noping|Barkeep49}} and {{noping|Cyberpower678}} have been appointed to the ] for the ]. {{noping|ThadeusOfNazereth}} and {{noping|Dr vulpes}} are reserve commissioners.
* Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the ].
* The Arbitration Committee is ] for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
] '''Miscellaneous'''
* An ] is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{tl|Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. ]


----
Hi, would you take a second look at this close, please? I think that there was a misunderstanding - the science park is an integral part of the school and not a separate entity. Consequently, an article on just part of a school is not practical. Whether the coverage of the science park part is sufficient to give the school notability is what the debate was about and the views were evenly balanced. IMHO this should have been closed as 'no consensus'. ] (]) 15:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
{{center|{{flatlist|
:According to the article () - it's a community science park. If you can find something else that says it's definitely part of the school I will certainly reconsider. ] ] 16:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 10:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1254686817 -->


== Adding One Piece to Highest-Grossing Franchises ==
== ] ==


Hello! As you could probably tell, I'm here to add the One Piece franchise to the list of highest-grossing franchises, but I wasn't really sure how. In 2024, there are plenty of sources that suggest One Piece should be somewhere on this list (most notably in the top 30 somewhere), and I tried to do it but I don't think my html skills are up to snuff anymore sadly. I was wondering if someone with more experience could either help me do it or add it themselves? Here are some of the sources that suggest One Piece should be here:
Hi Neil. Is this talk page still being used? Regards, ] <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small> 18:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
https://www.33rdsquare.com/one-pieces-total-franchise-value-is-estimated-at-20-5-billion-as-of-2023/
:I'm sticking references there as I find them prior to creating the article. People keep tagging it for deletion, but G5 only applies for orphaned talk pages that aren't helping build the encyclopedia. Assembling references clearly does. ] ] 19:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
::I saw it and thought it whether it may comply with G8 or not. I wasn't sure as the history was quite brief (and included a reversion) so I thought best to ask you before any action. Thank you for the response. Regards, ] <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small> 21:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


https://www.titlemax.com/discovery-center/the-25-highest-grossing-media-franchises-of-all-time/
== ] ==


https://in.ign.com/one-piece/197362/news/one-piece-has-surpassed-dragon-ball-in-merchandise-sales
A little more explanation might be appreciated as part of any editorial decisions. "The result was delete." is needlessly brusque. If you can not find time to write opinions to support your decisions, you should not be passing them down. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:"The result was" is put there automatically. If you believe the AFD closing message to be too blunt, then you need to discuss that at ]. ] ] 18:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


https://gbtimes.com/how-much-is-the-one-piece-franchise-worth/
== Ibiza question again ==


Thank you in advance!
I am not sure how to fix the following problem: In the ] article, I cannot find any edit links next to the sections. Could you point out what is going on with that? - ] ] 15:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
] (]) 18:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
:I am thinking that it is the images along the right side that are cocking matters up. Is there any general consensus regarding (free) image galleries in articles? If so, I could move most of the images to a section specifically for them, and maybe use them more appropriately in sections where they would be more useful. - ] ] 21:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


:I realized this isn't the thread to the actual article, sorry! lol ] (]) 18:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
==Deletion review for ]==
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. &mdash; <b>]</span>:<sup>]</sup></b> 14:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
==Deletion Review for young werewolves==

Neil, greetings. You recently deleted an article that I have tried to rewrite and I wanted to check with you if I should re-submit. I have revision as my user page. ] (]) 15:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].

Take the survey ''''''.

Kind Regards,

]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->

== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->

== Administrators' newsletter – December 2024 ==

] from the past month (November 2024).

]

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''Interface administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] ]

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* Following ], the ] has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the ] within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
* Following a ], a new speedy deletion criterion, ], has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.

] '''Technical news'''
* Technical volunteers can now register for the ], which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.

] '''Arbitration'''
* The arbitration case '']'' (formerly titled '']'') has been closed.
* An arbitration case titled '']'' has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1259680487 -->

{{-}}
== Precious anniversary ==
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}}
--] (]) 08:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==

] from the past month (December 2024).

<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] ]
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]

</div>
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]

] '''Oversight changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]

</div>
</div>

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
] '''Technical news'''
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

] '''Arbitration'''
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->

Latest revision as of 15:48, 5 January 2025

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34


Please place your comments at the bottom of the talk page. Make sure you sign your posts using four tildes, like this: ~~~~

New to Misplaced Pages? - hello! See Misplaced Pages:Welcome, Misplaced Pages:Help, and Misplaced Pages:My first article for useful advice to get you started. If those don't help you, then by all means please do come back and ask me your question(s).

Can't edit my talk page archives? If there is anything (chiefly privacy stuff) you would like removing or amending, let me know below or by email. If you are unsure whether you want everyone seeing your message, don't post it here - again, email me.

Your talk page archives

Hello! Could you please edit your older talk page archives (specifically, archives 1, 3, 4, 9, 19, 24, 30, 31, 32 and 33) so that they don't transclude {{Archive navigation}}? This template is deprecated and we're trying to clean up all uses of it before it gets deleted. Thanks! – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 12:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

@Hilst: All done, I think :) Fish+Karate 14:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 14:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Adding One Piece to Highest-Grossing Franchises

Hello! As you could probably tell, I'm here to add the One Piece franchise to the list of highest-grossing franchises, but I wasn't really sure how. In 2024, there are plenty of sources that suggest One Piece should be somewhere on this list (most notably in the top 30 somewhere), and I tried to do it but I don't think my html skills are up to snuff anymore sadly. I was wondering if someone with more experience could either help me do it or add it themselves? Here are some of the sources that suggest One Piece should be here: https://www.33rdsquare.com/one-pieces-total-franchise-value-is-estimated-at-20-5-billion-as-of-2023/

https://www.titlemax.com/discovery-center/the-25-highest-grossing-media-franchises-of-all-time/

https://in.ign.com/one-piece/197362/news/one-piece-has-surpassed-dragon-ball-in-merchandise-sales

https://gbtimes.com/how-much-is-the-one-piece-franchise-worth/

Thank you in advance! Molak156 (talk) 18:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

I realized this isn't the thread to the actual article, sorry! lol Molak156 (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)