| Revision as of 03:09, 8 September 2008 editDefensiveBlack (talk | contribs)13 edits →User:DefensiveBlack/Homotown: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:31, 18 September 2023 edit undoB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots533,515 edits Notification that File:Wbek logo.jpg is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 | ||
| (999 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|||24 October 2016}} | |||
| <!-- |
<!-- ADD NEW SECTIONS TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE --> | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} | |archiveheader = <noinclude>{{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}}</noinclude> | ||
| |maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 120K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 12 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
| |algo = old(9d) | |algo = old(9d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Rjd0060/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Rjd0060/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }}{{User:Rjd0060/uttop}} | }}{{User:Rjd0060/uttop}} | ||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:WQBU-FM logo.JPG== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ''']''' ] ] 23:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Ulster Defence Regiment == | |||
| == Speedy deletion nomination of Douglas Brown == | |||
| Hi, may I now formally ask for you to lift the page protection at ]? Discussion has died down, the disputed section has been rewritten and the warring editors appear to have desisted. I'm on vacation at the moment and I'd like to do some work on the artilce before returning to my own employment on Monday. I'd be grateful - thank you. ] (]) 03:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you. Fingers crossed. ] (]) 21:12, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm now getting intervention from . I'd be interested in your opinion on the subject matter because I personally can't see the logic behind this chap's actions, which I think are well enough intentioned.] (]) 15:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: ''Intervention'' it is an admin removing images inline with policy. Once again you are involved in an edit war, with an admin now, who removed images from '''your''' article. I seem to recal that you said you would not engage in any more edit wars so as to avoid a block for edit warring, but yet again you are, and the article is only unprotected. God forbid an editor who trys to change this article to anything that '''YOU''' dont like doesnt matter if you are violating policy just a case of ''I put it there and it stays''. <strong>]</strong>] 17:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I am not getting involved in this dispute. - ] (]) 17:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Firstly: I didn't know the guy was an admin to start with. When I reverted his removal of the images I posted a discussion message on his talk page. Secondly I discussed the mantter with him politely then thirdly realised that the problem could be overcome by using Crown Copyright in stead of Album Cover Rationale. You can clearly see I posted a message here asking for assistance and opinion and kept the other admin up to date as well with what I was doing. So no, I didn't engage in edit warring. I see from your prompt interjection however BigDunc that you're sitting there like a vulture waiting for the first mistake I make. Let me advise you that I have made sometrhing like 700 edits on Misplaced Pages since the UDR page was protected, just over 100 since the page was unprotected, of which 38 have been on the Ulster Defence Regiment page. I have had no difficulties with anyone in that period until now. Of course I realise that none of this carries any weight with you at all. Being polite, asking for assistance and generally playing the game by the rules and making 750 useful edits doesn't seem to suit your agenda but one little problem and you're right in there. Go ahead then, fill your boots, follow me around like a dog and see how much it affects me. ] (]) 17:37, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::No one has challenged any of your edits and when they do, guess what, you editwar, 2 reversions in succession is an edit war. And dont flatter yourself in to thinking that I am sitting like a vulture waiting to correct your mistakes. I could have removed the images when I saw them but left them as I knew as soon as I did the tired old accusations would have came flooding out and as I said I just couldn't be arsed to deal with the nonsense. <strong>]</strong>] 17:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Rjd0060, not withstanding the above I would still appreciate your comments on how I handled the issue of the images. I believe I have sorted it out properly by changing the tags to Crown Copyright and as the admin who removed the images hasn't intervened again I can only assume he accepts that. what do you think? ] (]) 17:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Once I realised the other editor was an admin I engaged him/her in dialogue and searched for a way round the issue. I discovered that Crown Copyright allowed the use of their published material for educational purposes. I then changed the tags to that of Crown Copyright, non-free and after informing the admin of that, reverted the images back and removed their orphan status. I have not heard from that admin since so can only assume I've done the right thing. If it subsequently transpires I haven't and he/she removes them again then I shall have to follow the policy to protest their removal, find the correct tagging and ask to include them in the article again. Do you think anything I've done in this instance has been improper? I've loaded quite a few images in the last few days but most of them have been simpler "own image-public domain" stuff or where copyright has expired. This is rather a new experience for me. ] (]) 17:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::May I draw your attention t0 please? ] (]) 17:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hello Rjd0060, | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ] for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. | |||
| Hi, you just deleted my page "televisionary". I'm not questioning your reason for this, i was just wondering if you could let me have a copy of the page so i can re-look at it. Since it's been deleted i can't see it anywhere. you can contact me at harrynrobinson@hotmail.com. Thanks. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can <span class="plainlinks">''''''</span>, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. | |||
| == Problem on a page you protected. == | |||
| You can leave a note on ] if you have questions. Thanks! | |||
| You protected the page ]. I noticed an error on the page, which I've noted on its talkpage , however no action has been taken yet, so I figured I'd contact you, as the admin who locked it up. (I'm not an admin, so I can't just fix it myself.) It appears that a chunk of text went missing with from June 24. Thanks for your attention. ] ] 20:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <small>Message delivered via the ] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small><!-- Template:Db-significance-notice-NPF --> | |||
| :The problem I see--and maybe I'm just missing something is: | |||
| {{cquote|Fix the article yourself | |||
| <span style="color:green">](he/him)<sup>]</sup></span> 07:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Misplaced Pages is a wiki, so you can edit the content yourself — you don't even need to create an account! '''We use the term "revert" to refer to''' | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Wbek logo.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Go to the article and click edit this page near the top. | |||
| Never edited before? Read the Introduction to Misplaced Pages. | |||
| If the offending content does not appear when you try to edit, then it has already been fixed. In that case, you don't need to do anything, even to "let us know". Force your Web browser to reload the page with Ctrl-F5, shift-Reload or whatever your browser uses.}} | |||
| :The "'''We use the "revert" to refer to'''" seems be dangling. We use it to refer to...what? I'm not sure what it's supposed to say, but the current version seem very wrong to me, but maybe I'm just missing something. What do you think? ] ] 21:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Much better! Looks great now. thanks for looking into this. ] ] 22:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Burnt Oak Records Deletion == | |||
| Given that Misplaced Pages features article on the members of parliament for Yukon, it seems strange that anyone would suggest the deletion of the 'Burnt Oak Records' page in lieu of them being one of the foremost indie labels responsible for the recent surge of musical output in southern Ontario. Moreover: they've received extensive coverage from the music press in Central Canada, and two of their artists (] & ]) are apparently noteworthy enough to have pages on Misplaced Pages created by different parties. Is there any way we can reverse this? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == ] tool account request (jeremyb) == | |||
| Is sufficient? (pretend I spelled registered correctly) Thanks --] (]) 05:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The ''Sarah Palin wheel war'' arbitration case, on which you have commented, is now open. | |||
| *Evidence for the arbitrators may be submitted at ]. Evidence should be submitted within one week, if possible. | |||
| *Your contributions are also welcome at ]. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 21:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Zachary Simons == | |||
| On August 1 you deleted ] as an expired prod. I didn't contest it (despite being the article's creator) because I agreed with the rationale. While I still don't think an independent article is possible, I'd like to undelete the article and salvage its content as part of an article I'm putting together on the Detroit Tigers' minor league organization (currently at ]). I don't think we need the whole machinery of AfD/DRV here, but I wanted to run it by you first before doing anything. Best, ] ] 14:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Mikael Ljungman == | |||
| Recently you elected to keep the article ] based on no consensus having being reached in the deletion debate. This was despite the fact that the only two Keep votes are from a single purpose account obviously linked with Mikael Ljungman and an account that was created mere minutes before the vote was placed. I fear that the Misplaced Pages process for avoiding abuse of the encyclopedia for self-promotion by non-notable businesses is no longer effective if policy is now to keep articles such as this where the article's subject can sway the administrators so easily. | |||
| --] (]) 03:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Deletion review for ]== | |||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ] (]) 09:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == RE:Meta logo == | |||
| I have replied at that forum specified. —<strong>]</strong>] 01:59, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I was wondering why you deleted this page. I noticed that you said it was an attack. I bewilders my mind that in the year 2008, people still use sexual preferences as slurs. I am a gay American. I am proud of who I am. I am stunned and appalled that you believe being called gay is an insult. Unfortunately I am only openly gay on Misplaced Pages. It is people like you that prevent people like me from being who I am. | |||
| --] (]) 03:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:31, 18 September 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Rjd0060 has not edited Misplaced Pages since 24 October 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I will usually reply to messages left here on this page so check back for a response.
 Archives
|
Orphaned non-free image File:WQBU-FM logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:WQBU-FM logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Douglas Brown
Hello Rjd0060,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Douglas Brown for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him) 07:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Wbek logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wbek logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Categories: