Revision as of 06:00, 10 September 2008 editMiltonP Ottawa (talk | contribs)374 edits ←Created page with 'Denis Rancourt is a former professor of physics at the University of Ottawa. Rancourt identifies himself as an activist and anarchist. He briefly ta...' | Latest revision as of 08:20, 6 December 2024 edit undoAlpha3031 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers13,793 edits npov dispute seems stale as well, untagging. | ||
(549 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Canadian physics teacher}} | |||
Denis Rancourt is a former ] of physics at the ]. Rancourt identifies himself as an ] and ]. He briefly taught an activism course at the university which received local and national media attention. | |||
{{Infobox person | |||
|name = Denis Rancourt | |||
|image = Denis_Rancourt.JPG | |||
|image_size = 250px | |||
|caption = Rancourt in his office at the ] in 2004 | |||
|birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1957|3|23}}<br/> ], Ontario | |||
|education = ] from ] (1980), ] from ] (1981), ] from ] (1984) | |||
}} | |||
'''Denis Rancourt''' is a former professor of ] at the ]. Rancourt is widely known for his confrontations with his former employer, the University of Ottawa, over issues involving his ] and "academic squatting", the act of arbitrarily changing the topic of a course without departmental permission.<ref name = "globe 02-06-09">{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090206.wprof06/BNStory/National/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20090206.wprof06|title=Professor makes his mark, but it costs him his job|last=Anderssen|first=Erin|date=2009-02-06|newspaper=Globe and Mail|accessdate=2009-02-07|archive-date=2009-04-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090422181013/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090206.wprof06/BNStory/National/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20090206.wprof06|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="Fish">{{cite news|url=http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/the-two-languages-of-academic-freedom/|title=The Two Languages of Academic Freedom|last=Fish|first=Stanley|date=2009-02-08|newspaper=New York Times|accessdate=2009-02-11}}</ref> | |||
He gained notoriety in 2006 when it came to the attention of the university and the local media that the activism course he was teaching had two elementary school aged children in it. The course was officially called SCI1101: Science in Society. | |||
== Early career== | |||
In 2006 Rancourt's students ] the University of Ottawa. The students alleged that the high-intensity workshop-based class needed more ] which the university would not provide. Rancourt publicly supported the students. <ref>Ottawa Citizen | |||
Rancourt obtained his bachelors degree in 1980 and subsequently his masters degree in 1981 in physics from the ]. He later obtained a PhD from the University of Toronto also in physics in 1984. He subsequently held several postdoctoral positions before obtaining a permanent position at the ] which he held for over 20 years, where he eventually obtained the rank of full professor.<ref>{{Cite web |title=CV - Denis Rancourt |url=https://denisrancourt.ca/page.php?id=3&name=cv |access-date=2024-03-21 |website=denisrancourt.ca}}</ref> | |||
==University conflict== | |||
His conflicts with the university started in 2005 when, in what was termed "academic squatting", he changed a course to focus "not just how science impacts everyday life, but how it relates to greater power structures".<ref name = "trew" >Trew, Stuart, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090422185309/http://www.ottawaxpress.ca/news/news.aspx?iIDArticle=8094 |date=2009-04-22 }}, ''Ottawa Xpress'', January 5, 2006.</ref><ref name = "tam" >Tam, Pauline, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107045831/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/city/story.html?id=29960aba-4da6-4b8a-8d4b-f88f2afe8db5&p=2 |date=2012-11-07 }}, ''The Ottawa Citizen'', February 15, 2006.</ref><ref name = "e-bulletin"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110713182818/http://onlinedb.lancasterhouse.com/index.asp?navid=2&layid=4&fid1=49&csid1=2712 |date=2011-07-13 }}. ''College and University Employment Law E-Bulletin'', Issue No.23. February 17, 2009.</ref> In June 2008 a labour law arbitrator sided with Rancourt and ruled that "teaching science through social activism is protected by academic freedom".<ref name = "e-bulletin" /> Rancourt was removed from all teaching duties in the fall of 2008 because the dean of the faculty of science did not agree with his granting A+ grades to 23 students in one course of the winter 2008 semester.<ref name = "globe 02-06-09" /> In December, the ] administration of the University of Ottawa began dismissal proceedings against him and he was banned from campus. This generated a province-wide (]) and national (]) public debate on grading in university courses.<ref name = "globe 02-06-09" /><ref name="TVO">, April 10, 2009</ref><ref name="GM Feb-11-2009">Anderssen, Erin, , ''Globe and Mail'', February 11, 2009.</ref><ref name="Macleans 2009">Pinchin, Karen, , ''Maclean's Magazine'', March 13, 2009.</ref><ref>, March 18, 2009 (Part-3).</ref><ref>McKiernan, Michael, , ''National Post'', April 6, 2009.</ref> The university's Executive Committee of the Board of Governors<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://web5.uottawa.ca/admingov/committee_3.html |title=Executive Committee of the Board of Governors | Committee | Administration and Governance |access-date=2010-03-31 |archive-date=2011-08-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110815010047/http://web5.uottawa.ca/admingov/committee_3.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> voted unanimously to fire Rancourt on March 31, 2009.<ref>Ottawa Citizen. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090409114646/http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Business/fires+controversial+physics+professor/1463108/story.html|date=2009-04-09}}. Accessed April 4, 2009</ref> Rancourt grieved the dismissal and the ] ran an into the matter.<ref name = "caut-icoi" /> The dismissal case went to binding arbitration where Rancourt's union took the position that the grading issue was a pretext to remove Rancourt and that the termination was done in bad faith.<ref name="LawyersWeekly">{{cite news|url=http://www.lawyersweekly-digital.com/lawyersweekly/3129?folio=4#pg5|title=Suit with racial tones to mediation|last=Guly|first=Christopher|date=2011-12-02|publisher=The Lawyers Weekly|accessdate=2011-12-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120405055608/http://www.lawyersweekly-digital.com/lawyersweekly/3129?folio=4#pg5|archive-date=2012-04-05|url-status=dead}} </ref> Arbitrator Claude Foisy ruled in a decision dated January 27, 2014,<ref>, Foisy Arbitration Award, January 27, 2014, APUO web site.</ref> to uphold the university's dismissal of Rancourt.<ref>Butler, Don, "Arbitrator upholds University of Ottawa's firing of tenured professor", ''Ottawa Citizen'', January 28, 2014.</ref> On March 10, 2014, Rancourt's union announced that it would appeal the Arbitrator's award.<ref>, APUO announcement, March 10, 2014, APUO web site.</ref><ref>Butler, Don, , ''Ottawa Citizen'', March 14, 2014.</ref> As a result, an independent inquiry was held, which, in December 2017, ruled that the termination was justified.<ref>{{cite web |title=Report released on termination of U of Ottawa professor {{!}} CAUT |url=https://www.caut.ca/latest/2017/12/report-released-termination-u-ottawa-professor |website=www.caut.ca}}</ref> | |||
===Independent Committee of Inquiry=== | |||
The activism course was suspended by the university administration in 2006 after a student complained the course content did not match the description given for the course. The University of Ottawa subsequently suspended the course indefinitely.<ref> Ottawa Citizen: </ref> The course had evolved from its original theme of activism and turned into an activism workshop where there was no hard and firm grading system. <ref> X-Press .</ref> The majority of students however enjoyed the course and rallied to support its continued existence on campus. | |||
In November 2008, the ] announced that it would establish an Independent Committee of Inquiry (ICOI) with terms of reference to: 1) "examine the series of ongoing disputes between Rancourt and the University of Ottawa"; 2) "to determine whether there were breaches or threats to academic freedom and other faculty rights"; and 3) "to make any appropriate recommendations". The Committee consists of three professors from ], ], and ].<ref name="caut-icoi">"CAUT Appoints Committee to Investigate Ottawa U Rancourt Case", ''CAUT Bulletin'', January 2009 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090422201752/http://www.cautbulletin.ca/en_article.asp?SectionID=1132&SectionName=News&VolID=274&VolumeName=No%201&VolumeStartDate=1%2F9%2F2009&EditionID=30&EditionName=Vol%2056&EditionStartDate=1%2F9%2F2009&ArticleID=2767|date=2009-04-22}}</ref> The report was released in 2017 and concluded that "the University of Ottawa was justified in terminating Dr. Rancourt for insubordination".<ref>{{Citation |year= 2017|title= Report released on termination of U of Ottawa professor|publisher= Canadian Association of University Teachers|url= https://www.caut.ca/latest/2017/12/report-released-termination-u-ottawa-professor|accessdate= June 26, 2020}}</ref> | |||
==Defamation case== | |||
Rancourt has been holding a documentary film and discussion series called Cinema Politica on campus since 2005. The event features a documentary film followed by an unmoderated, anarchist style discussion where group ] determines the topics and speakers. | |||
While at Ottawa Rancourt started a blog, U of O Watch, to report various alleged malfeasance of administrators and of his colleagues. The University used "copyright infringement" against the blog for using University web site images and disciplined Rancourt with a suspension that was grieved by Rancourt.<ref>, ''La Rotonde'', September 15, 2008.</ref> | |||
In June 2011 University of Ottawa law professor Joanne St. Lewis sued Rancourt for $1 million over two U of O Watch blog posts about her, including one which called her a "house negro".<ref name = "2014onsc3209">, ''Joanne St. Lewis v. Denis Rancourt'', 2014 ONSC 3209 (CanLII), May 27, 2014</ref><ref>{{Dead link|date=October 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, ''Ottawa Citizen'', June 24, 2011.</ref><ref>, ''Vancouver Sun'', June 24, 2011.</ref><ref>, ''National Post'', July 27, 2011.</ref> The ''Law Times'' (Canada) did a feature about the case on August 29, 2011.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120122091445/http://www.lawtimesnews.com/201108298631/Headline-News/U-of-O-law-prof-suing-colleague-over-house-negro-remark |date=2012-01-22 }}, ''Law Times'', August 29, 2011.</ref> | |||
Rancourt gained attention again in 2008 when the university denied use of university facilities for his weekly documentary film series. <ref>The Fulcrum </ref> The administration argued that Rancourt was not using the classroom space as it was originally intended. As of September 5th 2008, Rancourt is still hosting the Cinema Politica event at MacDonald Hall at the University of Ottawa. Rancourt has petitioned and received the help of another professor on campus to help him with the event which means the event may still on campus. The future is up in the air for the event which may have to move off campus if the university administration again intervenes against Rancourt.<ref>Le Droit </ref> | |||
The action went to trial in May 2014, but Rancourt walked out of the trial in the first week citing "reasonable apprehension of bias" and a "]", because the judge had struck out one of his defenses during his opening statement to the jury.<ref>Butler, Don, , ''Ottawa Citizen'', May 16, 2014.</ref> In June 2014, the court found Rancourt had libeled St. Lewis, and awarded $350,000 in damages, plus court costs.<ref name="ottawa.sun.001">{{cite news|url=http://www.ottawasun.com/2014/06/06/malicious-prof-must-remove-libellous-blog-posts|title=Malicious prof must remove libellous blog posts|last=Spears|first=Tony|date=June 6, 2014|newspaper=]|accessdate=17 June 2014}}</ref><ref name="ottawa.citizen.001">{{cite news|url=https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/u-of-o-prof-wins-libel-action-awarded-350000-damages|title=U of O prof wins libel case against Rancourt, awarded $350,000|last=Cobb|first=Chris|date=June 5, 2014|newspaper=]|accessdate=17 June 2014}}</ref> Rancourt appealed the decision, but his appeal was denied and he was ordered to pay St. Lewis $30,000 in costs for the appeal.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150722052936/http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/legalfeeds/2783/appeal-court-upholds-defamation-finding-in-law-prof-case.html |date=2015-07-22 }}, ''Legal Feeds'', by Yamri Taddese, July 9, 2015.</ref><ref name = "2015onca513">, ''St. Lewis v. Rancourt'', 2015 ONCA 513 (CanLII), July 8, 2015.</ref> | |||
==Other views == | |||
In 2007, Rancourt published an essay disputing the ] on his ], which has served as a platform for ] by politicians such as ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Orwig |first1=Jessica |title=7 global warming 'skeptics' who are massively missing the point |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/scientists-who-deny-climate-change-2015-10 |work=Business Insider |date=October 23, 2015}}</ref> In 2024, Rancourt made statements expressing support for various fringe views regarding ], including suggesting that the virus did not exist and that the symptoms were due to "psychological stress".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-03-18 |title=Denis Rancourt and "no virus": COVID-19 symptoms were due psychological stress from the pandemic response! {{!}} Science-Based Medicine |url=https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/denis-rancourt-and-no-virus-covid-19-symptoms-were-due-psychological-stress-from-the-pandemic-response/ |access-date=2024-03-21 |website=sciencebasedmedicine.org |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Teoh |first=Flora |title=Analysis claiming to find COVID-19 vaccines killed 17 million people is highly flawed, doesn't account for COVID-19 mortality surges |url=https://science.feedback.org/review/analysis-claiming-covid-19-vaccines-killed-17-million-people-flawed/ |website=Science Feedback |date=11 October 2023}}</ref> | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
<references /> | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Rancourt, Denis}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 08:20, 6 December 2024
Canadian physics teacherDenis Rancourt | |
---|---|
Rancourt in his office at the University of Ottawa in 2004 | |
Born | (1957-03-23) March 23, 1957 (age 67) North Bay, Ontario |
Education | Bachelor's Degree from University of Ottawa (1980), Master's Degree from University of Toronto (1981), Ph.D from University of Toronto (1984) |
Denis Rancourt is a former professor of physics at the University of Ottawa. Rancourt is widely known for his confrontations with his former employer, the University of Ottawa, over issues involving his grade inflation and "academic squatting", the act of arbitrarily changing the topic of a course without departmental permission.
Early career
Rancourt obtained his bachelors degree in 1980 and subsequently his masters degree in 1981 in physics from the University of Toronto. He later obtained a PhD from the University of Toronto also in physics in 1984. He subsequently held several postdoctoral positions before obtaining a permanent position at the University of Ottawa which he held for over 20 years, where he eventually obtained the rank of full professor.
University conflict
His conflicts with the university started in 2005 when, in what was termed "academic squatting", he changed a course to focus "not just how science impacts everyday life, but how it relates to greater power structures". In June 2008 a labour law arbitrator sided with Rancourt and ruled that "teaching science through social activism is protected by academic freedom". Rancourt was removed from all teaching duties in the fall of 2008 because the dean of the faculty of science did not agree with his granting A+ grades to 23 students in one course of the winter 2008 semester. In December, the Allan Rock administration of the University of Ottawa began dismissal proceedings against him and he was banned from campus. This generated a province-wide (Ontario) and national (Canada) public debate on grading in university courses. The university's Executive Committee of the Board of Governors voted unanimously to fire Rancourt on March 31, 2009. Rancourt grieved the dismissal and the Canadian Association of University Teachers ran an Independent Committee of Inquiry into the matter. The dismissal case went to binding arbitration where Rancourt's union took the position that the grading issue was a pretext to remove Rancourt and that the termination was done in bad faith. Arbitrator Claude Foisy ruled in a decision dated January 27, 2014, to uphold the university's dismissal of Rancourt. On March 10, 2014, Rancourt's union announced that it would appeal the Arbitrator's award. As a result, an independent inquiry was held, which, in December 2017, ruled that the termination was justified.
Independent Committee of Inquiry
In November 2008, the Canadian Association of University Teachers announced that it would establish an Independent Committee of Inquiry (ICOI) with terms of reference to: 1) "examine the series of ongoing disputes between Rancourt and the University of Ottawa"; 2) "to determine whether there were breaches or threats to academic freedom and other faculty rights"; and 3) "to make any appropriate recommendations". The Committee consists of three professors from York University, Wilfrid Laurier University, and Rider University. The report was released in 2017 and concluded that "the University of Ottawa was justified in terminating Dr. Rancourt for insubordination".
Defamation case
While at Ottawa Rancourt started a blog, U of O Watch, to report various alleged malfeasance of administrators and of his colleagues. The University used "copyright infringement" against the blog for using University web site images and disciplined Rancourt with a suspension that was grieved by Rancourt.
In June 2011 University of Ottawa law professor Joanne St. Lewis sued Rancourt for $1 million over two U of O Watch blog posts about her, including one which called her a "house negro". The Law Times (Canada) did a feature about the case on August 29, 2011.
The action went to trial in May 2014, but Rancourt walked out of the trial in the first week citing "reasonable apprehension of bias" and a "kangaroo court", because the judge had struck out one of his defenses during his opening statement to the jury. In June 2014, the court found Rancourt had libeled St. Lewis, and awarded $350,000 in damages, plus court costs. Rancourt appealed the decision, but his appeal was denied and he was ordered to pay St. Lewis $30,000 in costs for the appeal.
Other views
In 2007, Rancourt published an essay disputing the scientific consensus on climate change on his blog, which has served as a platform for climate denial by politicians such as James Inhofe. In 2024, Rancourt made statements expressing support for various fringe views regarding COVID-19, including suggesting that the virus did not exist and that the symptoms were due to "psychological stress".
References
- ^ Anderssen, Erin (2009-02-06). "Professor makes his mark, but it costs him his job". Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 2009-04-22. Retrieved 2009-02-07.
- Fish, Stanley (2009-02-08). "The Two Languages of Academic Freedom". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-02-11.
- "CV - Denis Rancourt". denisrancourt.ca. Retrieved 2024-03-21.
- Trew, Stuart, Understanding power Archived 2009-04-22 at the Wayback Machine, Ottawa Xpress, January 5, 2006.
- Tam, Pauline, Students rally around controversial professor Archived 2012-11-07 at the Wayback Machine, The Ottawa Citizen, February 15, 2006.
- ^ Teaching Science Through Social Activism is Protected by Academic Freedom, Arbitrator Rules Archived 2011-07-13 at the Wayback Machine. College and University Employment Law E-Bulletin, Issue No.23. February 17, 2009.
- TV-Ontario, The Agenda, with Steve Paikin, April 10, 2009
- Anderssen, Erin, The Provocative Professor, Globe and Mail, February 11, 2009.
- Pinchin, Karen, In this class, everyone gets A+, Maclean's Magazine, March 13, 2009.
- CBC Radio (National) - The Current, March 18, 2009 (Part-3).
- McKiernan, Michael, Flunking out over an A+, National Post, April 6, 2009.
- "Executive Committee of the Board of Governors | Committee | Administration and Governance". Archived from the original on 2011-08-15. Retrieved 2010-03-31.
- Ottawa Citizen. Archived 2009-04-09 at the Wayback Machine. Accessed April 4, 2009
- ^ "CAUT Appoints Committee to Investigate Ottawa U Rancourt Case", CAUT Bulletin, January 2009 Archived 2009-04-22 at the Wayback Machine
- Guly, Christopher (2011-12-02). "Suit with racial tones to mediation". The Lawyers Weekly. Archived from the original on 2012-04-05. Retrieved 2011-12-03. Alternative-links
- In the Matter of an Arbitration, Foisy Arbitration Award, January 27, 2014, APUO web site.
- Butler, Don, "Arbitrator upholds University of Ottawa's firing of tenured professor", Ottawa Citizen, January 28, 2014.
- Denis Rancourt arbitration, APUO announcement, March 10, 2014, APUO web site.
- Butler, Don, Decision on Denis Rancourt’s firing undermines academic freedom, professors say, Ottawa Citizen, March 14, 2014.
- "Report released on termination of U of Ottawa professor | CAUT". www.caut.ca.
- Report released on termination of U of Ottawa professor, Canadian Association of University Teachers, 2017, retrieved June 26, 2020
- Jugé derrière des portes closes, La Rotonde, September 15, 2008.
- Endorsement - Whether the words complained of in exhibits 3 and 4 are reasonably capable of defamatory meaning, Joanne St. Lewis v. Denis Rancourt, 2014 ONSC 3209 (CanLII), May 27, 2014
- Former colleague sues fired U of O physics professor for libel, Ottawa Citizen, June 24, 2011.
- Former colleague sues fired Ottawa professor for libel, Vancouver Sun, June 24, 2011.
- Calling black colleague ‘House Negro’ not racist: ex-professor, National Post, July 27, 2011.
- U of O law prof suing colleague over ‘house negro’ remark - Racial reference in a blog post by Denis Rancourt at the centre of lawsuit Archived 2012-01-22 at the Wayback Machine, Law Times, August 29, 2011.
- Butler, Don, Denis Rancourt boycotts his own trial for libel, citing 'kangaroo court', Ottawa Citizen, May 16, 2014.
- Spears, Tony (June 6, 2014). "Malicious prof must remove libellous blog posts". Ottawa Sun. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
- Cobb, Chris (June 5, 2014). "U of O prof wins libel case against Rancourt, awarded $350,000". Ottawa Citizen. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
- Appeal court upholds defamation finding in law prof case Archived 2015-07-22 at the Wayback Machine, Legal Feeds, by Yamri Taddese, July 9, 2015.
- Endorsement on Appeal, St. Lewis v. Rancourt, 2015 ONCA 513 (CanLII), July 8, 2015.
- Orwig, Jessica (October 23, 2015). "7 global warming 'skeptics' who are massively missing the point". Business Insider.
- "Denis Rancourt and "no virus": COVID-19 symptoms were due psychological stress from the pandemic response! | Science-Based Medicine". sciencebasedmedicine.org. 2024-03-18. Retrieved 2024-03-21.
- Teoh, Flora (11 October 2023). "Analysis claiming to find COVID-19 vaccines killed 17 million people is highly flawed, doesn't account for COVID-19 mortality surges". Science Feedback.