User talk:Mukadderat: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:03, 25 September 2008 edit91.149.190.179 (talk) →Web Brigades: new section← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 21:03, 12 November 2023 edit undoTNstingray (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,020 edits Notification: listing of Iron Queen at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle
(51 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{CheckedSockpuppet\|Altenmann\|Altenmann}}

	Talk page archives: ]		Talk page archives: ]
	]		]
	----		----

			==Enlightenment (concept)==
	==Re: Animal Names==
			Moved to ]. ] (]) 15:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

			== ] nomination of ] ==
			]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]").

			Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).

			You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

			'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

			==External Links==

			I am fully aware that the Misplaced Pages "nofollow" function means that external links have no ranking benefit for their destination pages.

			Did you take the time to see that every link I posted was to a ] that provides free help to people suffering from agoraphobia?

			Today, now that those links have been removed, there are people suffering from agoraphobia who are not finding badly-needed help because there are now ZERO external links on the wikipedia agoraphobia page. And these are people who already have great difficulty getting help. **Agoraphobics have a high suicide rate too.

			External links ARE allowed in wikipedia-- but they must relate to the article topic and must be non-commercial in nature.

			Those links met both criteria.

			] (]) 22:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
			:Misplaced Pages is encyclopedia, not medical advisor. We link only websites which contribute to '''article content'''. ] of various medical organizations. Suffering people may easily find all these organizations themselves, if they have computer, since they read wikipedia. Being a non-profit and "providing help" is not open ticket to wikipedia. Please read ]. ] (]) 23:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

			== RS ==

			Hi Mukadderat, I must apologize for my earlier rudeness. It was not intended and I withdraw the comment I made. I was writing out of frustration. Everything to do with that page has been very frustrating throughout its history, and I would welcome your help in sorting it out. I'm going to try not to think about it for a few hours, and hopefully after a break and some sleep, I'll be able to explain the background calmly, so that you can see where the problems lie. Again, I am sorry for being snippy. ] 05:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

			== AfD of first-class cricketers ==

			Hi. Please read ] and ]. Anyone who played ] meets the site's ] criteria. The fact that there may currently be minimal available data about the subject does not matter since the article can be created as a ] until such time as someone can expand it. You need to understand the site guidelines before using AfD and it is always better if you are unsure about an article to raise a question on the talk page of the relevant project, in this case at ]. ----<b>] \| <sup><i>]</i></sup></b> 05:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

			==Unreferenced BLPs==
	Thanks for your comment. I don't really know what else I can add; it's possibly not the most verifiable fact in the world, but I thought it was worth adding - the only reference I have is that it was a cutting from a copy of Reader's Digest from perhaps 8 years ago, from their Q&A page. Somebody had written in asking questions about animal names, and (I presume) the Reader's Digest researcher gave that answer. If there's some information there that you think should be added to the article, please do. Apart from that, I don't really know much more about it; perhaps you could search for other references to the woman in question? ] (]) 09:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
			] Hello Mukadderat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''2''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl\|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

			# ] - <small>{{findsources\|Armen Oganesyan}}</small>
	I've said all I know - I don't have a reference, I just know it was in Readers Digest a few years ago. I'll see what I can do. ] (]) 16:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
			# ] - <small>{{findsources\|Abdullah Abbas Nadwi}}</small>
			Thanks!--] (]) 07:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

			==Possible edit-warring==
	I've also linked it to ] <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:Article\| according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 17:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
			:Please don't engage in tit-for-tat warn-a-thons like this one . ] (]) 19:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
			::Please stop harassing me. Please discuss article content. You are the one who started the revert war. I invited you to state your objections in article talk page. ] (]) 23:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

			== ] nomination of ] ==
	==Russian Jokes==
			]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]").
	Thank you for editing and referencing the Rzhevsky jokes. However, using euphemisms in translating "ебать" perhaps you should justify that decision on the talk page. ] (]) 19:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

			Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).

			You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
	== Did you read the internet addiction paper? ==

			'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
	{{quotation\|To try and predict problematic Internet use in the workplace, Davis and colleagues designed the Online Cognition Scale to screen for possible Internet-related problems. They found that traits of decreased impulse control and procrastination appear to predict troublesome Internet use, and that in turn, high scores on their Scale predicted reprimands for Internet abuse.\|}}

			== AFD on Mycosporine-like amino acids ==
	Do you have access to that paper? If you do, you should have used CTRL-F to find this reference to procrastination in the paper. I'm going to revert you. ] \| (] - ]) 01:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
	:When you cite an article, you must enter information ''from this article'' inro wikiepdia, not just applend a paper reference to an existing paragraph. Wor example, are you seriously claiming that the journal article in question wrote "...or browsing and editing online encyclopedia articles (Misplaced Pages addiction)." ? ] (]) 15:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

			You gave a keep on ] but the AFD tag is still in the article. I could remove that myself but I think other houskeeping is required which I am not familiar with. ] (]) 14:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
	The paper supported the general conclusions of that paragraph. Sure, it could have used some minor editing, but not a wholesale deleting. There's no such "must" on Misplaced Pages -- if I find a paper that generally supports statements in the encyclopedia, that's fine. ] \| (] - ]) 03:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

			== Expansion of Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee ==
	== ] ==

			Hi there. I saw you created the article ]. I have written a longer more up-to-date version and it can be found on ]. I don't add it now myself because I work with one group with a perspective in the current situation (ALG) and I want to be sure there is consensus for this change. What do you think? I have also asked for advice at Wikiproject United States and the Help Desk too. --] (]) 19:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
	Until today, ] was a redirect to ], when a new user overwrote it as a virtual carbon copy of ] — which is also up for AfD and very unlikely to survive. I felt this was not a controversial move so I speedy closed the AfD. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 16:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
			:Oh, someone else took care of it, but please have a look, if you like. --] (]) 21:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	== Afro-Australian ==
			:'''This journalist does not appear to meet any of the criteria for ]; unable to find sufficient coverage to meet ].'''

			While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
	Hi - you wrote to me:
	::''Matilda, you deleted: 20:23, 26 May 2008 Matilda (Talk \| contribs) deleted "]" ‎ (POV fork )And it is protected from recreation now. Whatever it was, please notice there is "]" page. Please consider redirecting there or do something else. <small>signed </small> 00:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)''
	*No I am not prepared to redirect - per discussions at ] , ] and ]. In particular notice it is an inappropriately racist term invariably applied wrongly. People who wish to use the term need to think about what they are doing and find the correct links - redirection will only exacerbate inappropriate and racist editing. If you believe it is a valid term please take to DRV with substantiation. Regards ] <sup>]</sup> 00:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
	::Hi - very strong opinions :-) Thanks for understanding! --] <sup>]</sup> 00:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
	:::review the disambig page Black Australians for validity: done :-) --] <sup>]</sup> 02:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	==Internet brigades==
	I would highly appreciate if you discuss all changes prior to making blind reverts. In reply to the criticism, I provided a new source with extensive citation of original Russian text and brief English summary (see talk page; this is now included in the article). If you have any specific objections, please make them at the article talk page and wait for reply. Thank you very much for understanding. ] (]) 17:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">](])</span> 23:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
	== Coulrophobia editing ==
			==Category:Slaves of the Muslim world==

			''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 17:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
	This is in reference to the discussion about ], now in you ].

			== lurs in america and america and germany and sweden ==
	I agree that you cannot write rules about every mouseclick. The problems appear when someone removes something when there were actually reasons to keep it. From what I can see, you ''yourself'' agreed, in the ], upon the suggestion that characters strongly associated with coulrophobia qualifies to appear in the article. When there obviously is a rule, not just a general one but one concerning how this specific article is to be written, why can we not use it?

			hi , can you give me some useful information about lurs of other countries exept iran , iraq , oman?
	If this rule is not enough, then maybe you could tell me why you did not follow the guideline "Trivia sections should not be categorically removed" in ]?
			please help me!--] (]) 12:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

			== ] of ] ==
	You are now asking me about references. However, I know that you only ask rhetorically. Otherwise, you would have asked prior to removing anything, either in the article talk page or my talk page.
			]

			The article ] has been ]. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
	What kind of references are you really looking for? I did not make any claims about the issue, but merely described the way coulrophobia appeared in a show. The show in itself is of course a reliable, third-party, published source, proving that coulrophobia appears in television series.

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	My reason for writing about ], was to illustrate how coulrophobia is depicted in popular culture. Compared to others, who just wrote that a certain person in a certain episode is afraid of clowns, I wanted to give an accurate description, that could actually give some insights into the phenomenon (not just a list item). To achieve this, I spent quite some time, ensuring that the quote was exact and that the plot was described in as few words as possible, and also without writing a spoiler for the episodes.

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Lastly, I'm wondering if the risk of losing a wikipedian is considered a cost, and what price you and others are willing to pay? Maybe there are reasons to handles these things carefully sometimes, if newly written paragraphs need to be removed immediately after submission, especially when the issue is not covered within the guidelines? Like I said, I spent a lot of time writing the paragraph, only to have it removed a few hours later. Because of this, I stopped updating Misplaced Pages when I received your answer (feel free to check the ]), almost three months ago. I have earlier worked hard to remove vandalism, but not written much myself. When I finally wrote something and had to feel like a vandal myself, it was not really fun contributing to Misplaced Pages anymore (and, frankly, I can think of a lot of things on which my time is better spent). I really read everything I could find before writing. I was sure that what I wrote would be appreciated, but I was wrong. Hopefully, I will in time regain my interest, but, in a similar situation, someone else might lose their interest altogether.

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
	--] (]) 08:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

			== Hey, the reason I proposed for deletion ==
	== Circassians ==
			Hi, the page you created seems to have been abused by other editors (I didnt look too much at the history of the changes) but right now its only purpose seems to be for attacking the subject due to some dispute between the professor and some of his students. That is why I've nonimated it for deletion. However, if the page can be improved with some details on the subject that are actually useful, I'd support its continuation. Hope you understand. ] (]) 20:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
			== ] of ] ==
			]

			The article ] has been ] because of the following concern:
	BTW, I noticed the the article ] says, "''The term Çerkes, "]", became the blanket term for them in Turkey because the majority were Adyghe.''" Perhaps you could give your input at the discussion ] on whether ] should be merged into ]. Thanks. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 23:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
			<blockquote>Unsourced - duplicates ]</blockquote>

			While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
	== Essay template ==

			You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
	Why did you do that? ] <sup>]</sup> 15:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

			Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc\|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] <sup>(])</sup> 07:13, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
	== Web Brigades ==
			==] has been nominated for discussion==

			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
	Dear Mukadderat.
			== "Eu nacional" listed at ] ==
			]
			A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
			== "PSM (Disambiguation)" listed at ] ==
			]
			An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

			== ]: Contentious topic designation removed ==
	I refer to your restoration of Polish section in Web Brigades article. I would like to remind you of the following Misplaced Pages policy:

			Hello {{u\|Mukadderat}},
	http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Exceptional_claims_require_exceptional_sources

			As a very late update to the ] arbitration case, the ] designation, previously "discretionary sanctions", originally "article probation", has been removed following a successful
	Certain red flags should prompt editors to examine the sources for a given claim:

			Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic designation remain in force and are governed by the ].
	surprising or apparently important claims not covered by mainstream sources;
	reports of a statement by someone that seems out of character, embarrassing, controversial, or against an interest they had previously defended;
	claims that are contradicted by the prevailing view within the relevant community, or which would significantly alter mainstream assumptions, especially in science, medicine, history, politics, and biographies of living persons. This is especially true when proponents consider that there is a conspiracy to silence them.
	Exceptional claims in Misplaced Pages require high-quality sources; if such sources are not available, the material should not be included. Also be sure to adhere to other policies, such as the policy for biographies of living persons and the undue weight provision of Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view.

			This notification may be mostly unnecessary, but as you had been a party to the original case, I thought you might be interested in hearing that after about 15 years, this remnant has been removed. Until today, it was listed at {{slink\|Misplaced Pages:General_sanctions#Arbitration_Committee-authorised_sanctions}}.
	The source which supports claims you have restored is anonym. Could you prove us that this is an exceptional quality source?

			Best regards,<br>] (]) 19:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
	Another issue is that your source should be verifiable. How could you verify a claim by the anonym?
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 12#Iron Queen}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:03, 12 November 2023

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Altenmann (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to this sockpuppet investigation for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Talk page archives: Archive 1 Archive 2

Enlightenment (concept)

Moved to Talk:Enlightenment (spiritual)#Removed from my talk page. Mukadderat (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Misplaced Pages Watch

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Misplaced Pages Watch. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Watch (5th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

External Links

I am fully aware that the Misplaced Pages "nofollow" function means that external links have no ranking benefit for their destination pages.

Did you take the time to see that every link I posted was to a non-profit organization that provides free help to people suffering from agoraphobia?

Today, now that those links have been removed, there are people suffering from agoraphobia who are not finding badly-needed help because there are now ZERO external links on the wikipedia agoraphobia page. And these are people who already have great difficulty getting help. **Agoraphobics have a high suicide rate too.

External links ARE allowed in wikipedia-- but they must relate to the article topic and must be non-commercial in nature.

Those links met both criteria.

Sean7phil (talk) 22:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages is encyclopedia, not medical advisor. We link only websites which contribute to article content. wikipedia is not a web directory of various medical organizations. Suffering people may easily find all these organizations themselves, if they have computer, since they read wikipedia. Being a non-profit and "providing help" is not open ticket to wikipedia. Please read wikipedia:Notability (organizations). Mukadderat (talk) 23:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

RS

Hi Mukadderat, I must apologize for my earlier rudeness. It was not intended and I withdraw the comment I made. I was writing out of frustration. Everything to do with that page has been very frustrating throughout its history, and I would welcome your help in sorting it out. I'm going to try not to think about it for a few hours, and hopefully after a break and some sleep, I'll be able to explain the background calmly, so that you can see where the problems lie. Again, I am sorry for being snippy. SlimVirgin 05:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD of first-class cricketers

Hi. Please read WP:CRIN and WP:ATHLETE. Anyone who played first-class cricket meets the site's WP:Notability criteria. The fact that there may currently be minimal available data about the subject does not matter since the article can be created as a WP:STUB until such time as someone can expand it. You need to understand the site guidelines before using AfD and it is always better if you are unsure about an article to raise a question on the talk page of the relevant project, in this case at WT:CRIC. ----Jack | 05:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mukadderat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 9 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Armen Oganesyan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Abdullah Abbas Nadwi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Possible edit-warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Article. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Frotz (talk) 17:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Please don't engage in tit-for-tat warn-a-thons like this one . Frotz (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop harassing me. Please discuss article content. You are the one who started the revert war. I invited you to state your objections in article talk page. Mukadderat (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Time Cube

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Time Cube. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (6th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

AFD on Mycosporine-like amino acids

You gave a keep on Mycosporine-like amino acids but the AFD tag is still in the article. I could remove that myself but I think other houskeeping is required which I am not familiar with. Thincat (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Expansion of Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee

Hi there. I saw you created the article Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee. I have written a longer more up-to-date version and it can be found on my user page. I don't add it now myself because I work with one group with a perspective in the current situation (ALG) and I want to be sure there is consensus for this change. What do you think? I have also asked for advice at Wikiproject United States and the Help Desk too. --As in liberty (talk) 19:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh, someone else took care of it, but please have a look, if you like. --As in liberty (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oben Özaydın

The article Oben Özaydın has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This journalist does not appear to meet any of the criteria for WP:WRITER; unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J04n(talk page) 23:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Slaves of the Muslim world

Category:Slaves of the Muslim world, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

lurs in america and america and germany and sweden

hi , can you give me some useful information about lurs of other countries exept iran , iraq , oman? please help me!--دیارا (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Saliba

The article George Saliba has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hey, the reason I proposed for deletion

Hi, the page you created seems to have been abused by other editors (I didnt look too much at the history of the changes) but right now its only purpose seems to be for attacking the subject due to some dispute between the professor and some of his students. That is why I've nonimated it for deletion. However, if the page can be improved with some details on the subject that are actually useful, I'd support its continuation. Hope you understand. Code16 (talk) 20:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Controversy (law)

The article Controversy (law) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced - duplicates Case or Controversy Clause

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Category:Caucasian muhajirs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Caucasian muhajirs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

"Eu nacional" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Eu nacional. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Eu nacional until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Nabla (talk) 16:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

"PSM (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect PSM (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#PSM (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat: Contentious topic designation removed

Hello Mukadderat,

As a very late update to the Prem Rawat arbitration case, the contentious topic designation, previously "discretionary sanctions", originally "article probation", has been removed following a successful request for amendment.

Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic designation remain in force and are governed by the contentious topics procedure.

This notification may be mostly unnecessary, but as you had been a party to the original case, I thought you might be interested in hearing that after about 15 years, this remnant has been removed. Until today, it was listed at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions § Arbitration Committee-authorised sanctions.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

"Iron Queen" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Iron Queen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 12 § Iron Queen until a consensus is reached. TNstingray (talk) 21:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:

Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Altenmann