| Revision as of 15:29, 25 September 2008 editZidel333 (talk | contribs)1,984 edits →US Constitition FAR heads up: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:26, 9 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject United States/Archive 16) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell| | ||
| {{WikiProject United States}} | |||
| {{archivebox| | |||
| * ] | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| <noinclude> | |||
| ] | |||
| </noinclude> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject United States/Tab header}} | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject United States/TOC}} | |||
| {{Old MfD |date=19 July 2022 |result='''no consensus''' |page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject United States/US related unreferenced BLPs |altpage=Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject United States/US related unreferenced BLPs}} | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject United States/Navigation}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |||
| |counter = 16 | |||
| |algo = old(60d) | |||
| |archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
| |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject United States/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject United States/Archive index|mask=Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject United States/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} | |||
| __TOC__<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
| == Strange sections on main project page == | |||
| seems to have transcluded <nowiki>{{WP:CBTF}}</nowiki> into various WikiProjects, including this one. I'm not quite sure if the original editor meant to use {{tl|WP:CBTF}} but there's some weird stuff about communities and adopting abandoned babies in New Zealand as a result. I suggest removing everything below the section titled "Members". —] | ] 05:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Abraham Lincoln assassination GA Sweeps Review: On Hold== | |||
| As part of the ], we're doing ] to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the ]. I have left this message at this WikiProjects's talk page since the article falls under its scope and so that any interested members can assist in helping the article keep its GA status. I'm specifically going over all of the "World History-Americas" articles. I have reviewed ] and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a ]. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix. I left messages for the other WikiProjects/task forces and the main contributors to the article so that the workload can be shared. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --] (]) 21:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Peer review request == | |||
| Dear all. A peer review has been ] for the article ]. Your comments on how best to improve it would be appreciated. ] (]) 19:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == History task force == | |||
| What would you guys say to an American history task force of ]? We don't currently have many people interested in this, so we'd like this project to provide some editors.--]]] 20:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :It's a good idea. We've been talking about this on ]. Even if this project won't support it, you could just start the task force and just ask the descendent projects to join. If you do start it, let us know so we can change the template and start tagging American history articles relevant to the history of Hawaii. —] | ] 12:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| The ] page has gone through some major revisions as of late. Could people weigh in on the issue if the controversy section should be expanded (I say no, because it will just create feuding about "POV balance") and re-examine the page. Also, if there is anything that can be added in regards to U.S. history, Adams, Jefferson, etc, that would help. Thanks. ] (]) 06:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Square Deal == | |||
| Can someone take a look at ]? There seems to have been significant vandalism and deletion this month, I think the last good copy is from Jan.10, but I'm not sure. ] (]) 05:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Reflists in US City articles == | |||
| I randomly came across ] and noticed that the footnotes were unclickable. I added a reflist template and they showed up OK. I checked the rest of ] and all but one of the seven "cities" had no reference section. I fixed those, then looked around a bit. | |||
| I see that ] also has unclickable footnotes. It looks as though maybe there could be a very large number of these situations and not easily fixable by hand. Presumably a lot of information was created/added by a bot and this aspect was missed. | |||
| If this is indeed a problem, it looks like this will be best handled by a bot. I'm not gonna check every city, town and village in the US, so I thought I'd just pass this along. Cheers! ] (]) 05:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :This is the result of a recent conversion (since the beginning of the month) of the various versions of the <nowiki>{{GR}}</nowiki> templates, used in every municipality and CDP article nationwide. A bot has already been ], and I expect that we should see work beginning pretty soon. ] (]) 14:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Portal:Indiana is up for Featured portal candidate discussion == | |||
| ] is up for ]. Your comments would be appreciated, at ''']'''. ] (]) 11:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ;Update | |||
| Actually, at this point in time ''all'' of the Featured portal candidates up for discussion are relevant to this WikiProject. Your comments would be appreciated at all of those discussions. ] (]) 11:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Peer review for ] == | |||
| After not getting any suggestions the first time I nominated ] for peer review last month, I put it up a second time ]. Still without a review, I'm asking where I can for editors to help give suggestions on our article. Thanks!--] ] 02:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==American Revolution GA Sweeps Review: On Hold== | |||
| As part of the ], we're doing ] to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the ] and I'm specifically going over all of the "World History-Americas" articles. I have reviewed ] and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a ]. I have left this message at this WikiProject's talk page so that any interested members can assist in helping the article keep its GA status. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left messages on the talk pages of the main contributors of the article along with other task forces/WikiProjects. Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix if multiple editors assist in the workload. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --] (]) 01:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Requests== | |||
| Isn't there a requested articles page for the US somewhere? ] (]) 10:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Date of formation of the United States? == | |||
| The editors of the ] article have settled on 1776 as being the foundation of the state (I note with concern though that this date lacks any external referencing, per official Misplaced Pages policy ]). | |||
| But this article - ] - claims that the 'Date of statehood' of the United States was actually 1787 (again, completely unreferenced). Both articles cannot be correct, so which is it? Please come to the party armed with some proper external refs, per official Misplaced Pages policy WP:VERIFY. --] (]) 11:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::The question really is: Which United States of America are we talking about. The Confederation that existed under the '''''Article of Confederation''''' certainly dates from 1776, but the Federal Union that exists today under the '''''US Constitution''''' only dates from 1789. The States - as organized governments - date in most cases from 1776, although some have organizational histories that predate that year. For example, New York had an organized government since its Dutch Days as New Netherlands which continued to function right up to the date when it declared its independence from Britain. ] (]) 20:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == EARLY US HISTORY == | |||
| It has occurred to me that you guys are starting this project too far forward in time. You need to go back and show how the arrival of the various European powers started the ball rolling that eventuated in the US coelescing the way it did. For example, the various Anglo-Dutch wars that resulted in Britain trading Curacao for New Netherlands, and the Dutch and British adjusting the border between Connecticut and New Netherlands, and even the Dutch and the British establishing a border partitioning Long Island. Those are just examples, but you get the idea. We all have looked at American History as a pre-packaged history where we opened a box, and the USA jumped out fully formed. Of course, that is not true, but that is the impression that you've arrived at. ] (]) 20:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == FAR notice for the Bill of Rights (please discuss ]) == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Reviewers' concerns are ]. | |||
| ] (]) 09:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Main page nomination for Manzanar == | |||
| With the coming up on April 26, I have nominated ] to be on Misplaced Pages's main page on that date. Please add your support for that at ]. Thank you! -- ] (]) 21:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Blackstone Hotel == | |||
| Can someone tell me if ] belongs in this project. Drop a note on my talk page.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 21:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Andrew Jackson and Hitler== | |||
| This is being posted at this project page based on the recommendations of ]. There is an ongoing discussion at ]. | |||
| The issue is whether an article in a Swedish language newspaper quoting a professor of comparative religion constitutes a reliable source justifying linking Jackson’s Indian Removal policy with Hitler’s ] attempt to exterminate the Jewish race. There is a wealth of credible, academic material available to offer valid and harsh criticisms of Jackson’s policy without resorting to the extremes of comparisons with Hitler. | |||
| In any event, I would appreciate anybody with an opinion on the subject to weigh in at the Jackson link above. As the matter stands, there is only one editor supporting retaining the language, but I am not sure that a consensus for removing it currently exists (many in opposition are IPs or infrequent editors). ] (]) 16:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==2008 Major League Soccer season standings== | |||
| For those of you who cares about American soccer, there is a discussion about the standings format ] and there is a vote of consensus ]. The topic is about whether to use Wins-Losses-Ties or to use Wins-Draws-Losses. ] (]) 16:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for Peer Review == | |||
| I have requested a peer review of the ] main article, in order to gain some new perspective on the page. I invite anyone interested to please contribute their thoughts. Please find the peer review page for it ]. Thanks! (] (]) 10:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)) | |||
| == CfD nomination of Category:United States ghettos == | |||
| <div class="messagebox standard-talk" style="text-align:center;"> | |||
| The related ''']''' has been nominated for '''deletion, merging, or renaming]''' You are encouraged to join the ''']''' on the ] page. <!-- Generated by Template:Cfdnotice --> | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Merge proposal == | |||
| There's been a merge suggestion on ]. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 19:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Article requests == | |||
| Perhaps this project should have its own ] page, separate from the larger list I have linked to recently on the project page (])? ] (]) 05:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, there has been an ongoing discussion of the balance of this article over the last few months, and any comments from members of this project would be very welcome. ] (]) 08:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Some sources on the topic are. | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| * Simon Harrison ''"Skull Trophies of the Pacific War: transgressive objects of remembrance"'' Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute () | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| * James J. Weingartner ''"Trophies of War: U.S. Troops and the Mutilation of Japanese War Dead, 1941-1945"'' Pacific Historical Review () | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| * (Image) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| * The telegraph article. | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| * ] 3/22/1996, Weingartner, James | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 00:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| * ] 6/22/1994 Brcak, Nancy; Pavia, John R. | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:28, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| --] <sup>]</sup> 13:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 19:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Ribbon== | |||
| Hello Ive created a ] for The WikiProject United States Barnstar of National Merit. Hope you like it. | |||
| ]. <span style="font-family:Gill Sans MT">]]</span> 14:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussion on the renaming of the article ] == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please see ] for a discussion about renaming ] to ]. ] (]) 17:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Would any of you be able to clarify this bewildering article? -- ] ]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>] 05:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ==] GA Sweeps Review: On Hold== | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| As part of the ], we're doing ] to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the ] and I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I have reviewed ] and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a ]. I have left this message at this WikiProject's talk page so that any interested members can assist in helping the article keep its GA status. In reviewing the article, I have found there are a few issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left messages on the talk pages of the main contributors of the article and other related WikiProjects. Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix if multiple editors assist in the workload. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --] (]) 16:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I have also reviewed ] and it has several issues that need to be addressed as well. If you have any questions, please let me know on my talk page. Happy editing! --] (]) 03:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::] is also on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing! --] (]) 05:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| == Articles flagged for cleanup == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 00:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Currently, 822 of the articles assigned to this project, or 36.2%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of {{date|2008-06-18}}.) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See ] for details. Subsribing is easy - just add ] to your project page. <small>If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at ].</small> --] (]) 17:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 20:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 20:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| This project's subject has a page in the set of ]. | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC ongoing at ] == | |||
| See the proposal at the ] to change the names of all those pages. | |||
| There is a RfC ongoing at ], an article within the scope of this WikiProject. All editors are invited to participate. '''] ]''' 18:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ''''']''''' 10:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| ==Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme== | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] 02:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| As you ], we at the Misplaced Pages 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at ]. | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] 02:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *The '''new C-Class''' represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class. | |||
| *The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of ], and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects. | |||
| *A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as ]. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at ]. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. ] is already finding and listing C-Class articles. | |||
| My concern is that every single man on this list is in fact a traitor, and treason has reasons to source. Please fix this issue. ] (]) 11:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Please ] with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Misplaced Pages 1.0 scheme! For the ], <font color="green">]</font>''' <small>(<font color="red">]</font>)'''</small> 21:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ==That's outrageous!== | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I've heard religious toleration guaranteed to ] after ] called one of the "outrageous acts" leading to the Revolution. If anybody can source it, would you include it at La Conquête? Thanks. ] ]</font> 14:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ==2 articles from this Wikiproject are up for deletion== | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| They are ] and ], just to let you know. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;">] | <small></small></span> 13:46, 8 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ==Census phrasing== | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 03:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| While the people distributing the census did a great job, I do have one small comment. The phraseology used "population is spread out" seems clunky to me. I would suggest "population is distributed by age" a better, if imperfect, substitution. Also, went I went to change this, an admin altered my wording back to the clunky phrase. Where is it written in stone that this phrase '''must''' be used? ] (]) 12:09, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == New US environment articles == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 03:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| I have created ] and ]as overview articles. -- ] (]) - 21:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] <sub> '']''</sub> 20:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| :And now ]. -- ] (]) - 02:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Reliable sources for US political articles == | |||
| ===Listed on Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion== | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| There is an interesting discussion regarding reliable sources for US political articles at ] --] (]) 14:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Bush Doctrine background == | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| We need to reach a consensus in a discussion and some input is needed on ]. Please include your Wikipedian views. Thanks. ] (]) 17:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == Misplaced Pages 0.7 articles have been selected for United States == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] is a collection of English Misplaced Pages articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The ] has made an . | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == A problem with politics articles, especially senator articles == | |||
| We would like to ask you to review the . These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at ]. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at ]. | |||
| ]: "A member of the Democratic Party, he has been the '''senior''' U.S. senator from Arizona since 2020". This isn't actually true. He's been in the Senate since 2020, but he only just became the senior senator. I think similar statements appear in a number of articles. ] (]) 07:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| A , sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with ], although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. | |||
| :Correct. It's a problem that people care about shoehorning in whether they are the junior or senior senator without regard for sentence flow. Please edit those articles to fix it or at least tell us which ones do this. I'll fix Kelly. – ] (]) 15:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at ] of ]. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Misplaced Pages 1.0 Editorial team, ] 23:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| == Please contribute your opinions on proposals at ] == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 19:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| An RfC has started on whether the word "terrorism" can be mentioned and discussed at ] (already tagged as part of the scope of this project) and in WP articles on ], his wife ] (then the group's leader) and ]. Editors are discussing whether we can come to a consensus. Please take a look and participate. -- ] (]) 18:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Order in the 'President of the Continental Congress' is fucked == | |||
| == US Constitition FAR heads up == | |||
| In the infobox of each ] holder, the order is self-contradictory with one another. Some of them are ordered based on the name of the office (ie. 1st President of the First Continental Congress v 1st President of the Confederation Congress) or ordered based on all previous titles combined. These also contradict the NavBox at the bottom of each page. Can someone who better knows the topic let me know which order is best? ] (]) 05:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| As a related Wikiproject, I'm informing you that ] has been nominated for a ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Reviewers' concerns are ]. Cheers! ] (]) 15:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:26, 9 January 2025
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| Main page | Talk | Embassy | Requested Articles | Members | Portal | Recognized content | To do | Help |
|
|
Archives: Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 |
|
Old U.S. notice board archives: National, Southern, Northern |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. | |
 |
|
 | WikiProject United States was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 4 July 2011. |
 | Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject United States/US related unreferenced BLPs was nominated for deletion on 19 July 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Good article reassessment for Joseph McCarthy
Joseph McCarthy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for East Carolina University
East Carolina University has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Neal Boortz
Neal Boortz has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Death of Abdul Wahid#Requested move 8 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Death of Abdul Wahid#Requested move 8 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe 21:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Economic policy of the Joe Biden administration#Requested move 10 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Economic policy of the Joe Biden administration#Requested move 10 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 00:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for John Glenn Columbus International Airport
John Glenn Columbus International Airport has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:28, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for The Contest
The Contest has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Discussion on the renaming of the article Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge
Please see here for a discussion about renaming Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge to United States support for the Khmer Rouge. FOARP (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Dick Cheney
Dick Cheney has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:European Union–United States relations#Requested move 23 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:European Union–United States relations#Requested move 23 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Web-julio (talk) 00:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Batman in film
Batman in film has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Margaret Chin
Margaret Chin has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Ne-Yo
Ne-Yo has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
RfC ongoing at Talk:2004 United States election voting controversies#RFC: What Went Wrong in Ohio
There is a RfC ongoing at Talk:2004 United States election voting controversies#RFC: What Went Wrong in Ohio, an article within the scope of this WikiProject. All editors are invited to participate. Toa Nidhiki05 18:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Expectation of privacy (United States)#Requested move 25 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Expectation of privacy (United States)#Requested move 25 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 02:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Nonpartisan blanket primary#Requested move 2 December 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Nonpartisan blanket primary#Requested move 2 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 02:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
List of Confederate States senators
My concern is that every single man on this list is in fact a traitor, and treason has reasons to source. Please fix this issue. Bearian (talk) 11:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Mitch Daniels
Mitch Daniels has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for 2017 World Series
2017 World Series has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Anuel AA
Anuel AA has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for American automobile industry in the 1950s
American automobile industry in the 1950s has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for 1st Brigade, 7th Infantry Division (United States)
1st Brigade, 7th Infantry Division (United States) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 20:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for American Horror Story
American Horror Story has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Reliable sources for US political articles
There is an interesting discussion regarding reliable sources for US political articles at WT:RS#This is curious... --Magnolia677 (talk) 14:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wings (1927 film)
Wings (1927 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for 102nd Intelligence Wing
102nd Intelligence Wing has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
A problem with politics articles, especially senator articles
Mark Kelly: "A member of the Democratic Party, he has been the senior U.S. senator from Arizona since 2020". This isn't actually true. He's been in the Senate since 2020, but he only just became the senior senator. I think similar statements appear in a number of articles. 174.160.82.127 (talk) 07:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Correct. It's a problem that people care about shoehorning in whether they are the junior or senior senator without regard for sentence flow. Please edit those articles to fix it or at least tell us which ones do this. I'll fix Kelly. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Benny Friedman#Requested move 4 January 2025
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Benny Friedman#Requested move 4 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Yeshivish613 (talk) 19:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Order in the 'President of the Continental Congress' is fucked
In the infobox of each President of the Continental Congress holder, the order is self-contradictory with one another. Some of them are ordered based on the name of the office (ie. 1st President of the First Continental Congress v 1st President of the Confederation Congress) or ordered based on all previous titles combined. These also contradict the NavBox at the bottom of each page. Can someone who better knows the topic let me know which order is best? GGOTCC (talk) 05:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: