Misplaced Pages

Mucoid plaque: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:24, 5 November 2008 editSmackBot (talk | contribs)3,734,324 editsm Date maintenance tags and general fixes← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:27, 1 July 2024 edit undoKuru (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators204,695 edits not the same; garbage source as wellTag: Manual revert 
(463 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Pseudoscientific term in alternative medicine}}
{{POV|date=November 2008}}
{{Infobox pseudoscience
'''Mucoid plaque''' or '''mucoid rope''' is a term used by some ] websites and books to describe an allegedly harmful ] material that is said to coat the ]s of most people. The term was coined by Richard Anderson, a ] and ] who sells a range of products that claim to cleanse the body of such plaques.<ref>Anderson, Richard. ''Cleanse & Purify Thyself Book Two''. Christobe Publishing, 2000 page 59</ref>
|image =
|image_width =
|caption =
|claims = Claimed to be a harmful material coating the gastrointestinal tract.
|topics = ]
|origyear = Early 20th century
|origprop = Richard Anderson
|currentprop =
}}
'''Mucoid plaque''' (or mucoid cap or rope) is a ] term used by some ] advocates to describe what is claimed to be a combination of harmful ] material and food residue that they say coats the ] of most people. The term was coined by Richard Anderson, a ] and ], who sells a range of products that claim to "cleanse" the body of such purported plaques.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight>{{cite news |url=https://www.straight.com/article/colon-cleanses-thrive-despite-scant-proof |title=Colon cleanses thrive despite scant proof | newspaper = ] | access-date=2008-11-05}}</ref>


Many such "]" products are promoted to the public on websites that have been described as making misleading medical claims.<ref name=Hochster/> The presence of laxatives, ], and fibrous thickening agents in some of these "cleansing agents" has led to suggestions that the products themselves produce the excreted matter regarded as the plaque.<ref name=Hochster/><ref name=Schwarcz/>
The existence of mucoid plaque has been dismissed by ]s as having no anatomical or physiological basis.<ref name="bjmu">{{Cite web | url=http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf | title=Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information | work=MedInfo2004 | publisher=IOS Press, Amsterdam | accessdate=2007-02-21}}</ref><ref name="uthman"/><ref name="friedlander"/>
The concept of a 'mucoid plaque' has been dismissed by medical experts as having no anatomical or physiological basis.<ref name="bjmu">{{Cite journal|last=Soergel |first=Dagobert |author2=Tony Tse |author3=Laura Slaughter |url=http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf |title=Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information |journal=MedInfo2004 |publisher=IOS Press, Amsterdam |year=2004 |volume=107 |issue=Pt 2 |pages=931–5 |pmid=15360949 |access-date=2012-08-31 |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717205922/http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf |archive-date=July 17, 2011 }}</ref><ref name="uthman">{{cite web | publisher = ] | url = http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/QA/mucoidplaque.html | title = Mucoid Plaque | first = Edward | last = Uthman | date = 7 January 1998 | access-date = 2007-02-21}}</ref><ref name="friedlander">{{cite web| url = http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#colonic |title = Ed's Guide to Alternative Therapies: Colonics | first = Ed | last = Friedlander | access-date = 2007-02-21}}</ref>
Mucoid plaque is predominantly discussed within the ] community, particularly in ] accounts of ] procedures.
<ref>, by Hannah Borno. Published online by the '']''. Accessed 21 Feb 2007.</ref>


== History == ==History==


In 1932, Bastedo, M.D. writes in the ] his observation of a colon irrigation procedure: “When one sees the dirty gray, brown or blackish sheets, strings and rolled up wormlike masses of tough mucus with a rotten or dead-fish odor that are obtained by colon irrigations, one does not wonder that these patients feel ill and that they obtain relief and show improvement as the result of the irrigation.<ref>Bastedo, WA. “Colonic irrigations: their administration, therapeutic application and dangers”. JAMA (1932) v98 p736. </ref> Various forms of colon cleansing were popular in the 19th and early 20th century.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Sullivan-Fowler M |title=Doubtful theories, drastic therapies: autointoxication and faddism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries |journal=J Hist Med Allied Sci |volume=50 |issue=3 |pages=364–90 |date=July 1995 |pmid=7665877 |doi=10.1093/jhmas/50.3.364}}</ref> In 1932, Bastedo wrote in the ] about his observation of mucus masses being removed during a colon irrigation procedure: "When one sees the dirty gray, brown or blackish sheets, strings and rolled up wormlike masses of tough mucus with a rotten or dead-fish odor that are obtained by colon irrigations, one does not wonder that these patients feel ill and that they obtain relief and show improvement as the result of the irrigation."<ref>{{cite journal | last = Bastedo WA | title = Colonic irrigations: their administration, therapeutic application and dangers | publisher = JAMA | year = 1932 | volume = 98 | pages = 736}}</ref>


While colonic irrigation enjoyed a vogue in the early 20th century as a possible cure for numerous diseases, subsequent research showed that it was useless and potentially harmful.<ref name=Ernst>{{cite journal|last1=Ernst|first1=E|author-link=Edzard Ernst|title=Colonic irrigation and the theory of autointoxication: a triumph of ignorance over science.|journal=]|date=June 1997|volume=24|issue=4|pages=196–198|pmid=9252839|doi=10.1097/00004836-199706000-00002|doi-access=free}}</ref> With the scientific rationale for "colon cleansing" disproven, the idea fell into disrepute as a form of ], with a 2005 medical review stating that "there is no evidence to support this ill-conceived theory that has been long abandoned by the scientific community."<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A |title=Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation |journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=232–42 |date=January 2005 |doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40885.x |pmid=15654804 |s2cid=8060335 }}</ref> Similarly, in response to claims that colon cleansing removes "toxins", Bennett Roth, a gastroenterologist at the ], stated that "there is absolutely no science to this whatsoever. There is no such thing as getting rid of quote-unquote 'toxins.' The colon was made to carry stool. This is total baloney."<ref name=Foreman/> The preoccupation with such bowel management products has been described as a "quaint and amusing chapter in the history of weird medical beliefs."<ref>{{cite news | first = Denise | last = Grady | url = https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A05E2DA1E3AF930A15756C0A9669C8B63&sec=health&spon=&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink | title = Cult of the Colon: From Little Liver Pills to Big Obsessions | work = ] | date= May 23, 2000}}</ref> Nevertheless, interest in colonic "]" as a cause of illness, and in colonic irrigation as a cure, enjoyed a revival in ] at the end of the 20th century.<ref name=Ernst/>
Before Richard Anderson, the most prominent alternative medicine practitioners to talk about the concept have preferred various names. Robert Gray<ref>Gray, Robert. ''The Colon Health Handbook''. 1990</ref> referred to it as ''mucoid matter'', Victor Earl Irons<ref>V. Earl Irons, Sr. ''The Destruction of Your Own Natural Protective Mechanism''</ref> and Bernard Jensen<ref> Jensen, Bernard. ''Tissue Cleansing Through Bowel Management''. 1981.</ref> referred to it as ''toxic mucous lining'' or layer, and John R. Christopher<ref>Christopher, John. ''Dr. Christopher’s Three-Day Cleansing Program, Mucusless Diet and Herbal Combinations''. 1995</ref> referred to it as ''catarrh'' or simply ''mucus''.


The term "mucoid plaque" was coined and popularized by ] and ] Richard Anderson, who sells a range of products that claim to cleanse the body of such purported plaques by causing them to be eliminated.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight/> Anderson describes a mucoid plaque as a rubbery, ropey, generally green ]-like mucus film that covers the ]s of the ], particularly of the ]. Anderson also claims the plaque can impair digestion and the absorption of nutrients, hold ]s, and cause illnesses such as ], ], ] and skin conditions. Based on these claims, he promotes efforts to remove the plaque, and sells a range of products to this end.<ref name=Schwarcz>{{cite news|author1=Joe Schwarcz|author-link1=Joseph A. Schwarcz|title=I have a gut feeling something's wrong here|url=http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=437cc94f-2b5f-4327-abf8-762f63e6067a|work=Montreal Gazette|date=April 5, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120603145225/http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=437cc94f-2b5f-4327-abf8-762f63e6067a&p=1|archive-date=June 3, 2012}}</ref><ref name="AndersonBooks">{{cite book| last = Anderson | first = Richard |title = Cleanse & Purify Thyself, Books One and Two | publisher = Christobe Publishing |year = 2000}}</ref>
== Claims ==
The term "mucoid plaque" was ] by Richard Anderson, a naturopath and entrepreneur whose products purport to remove mucoid plaque. Anderson explains that it is a term he coined to describe a "gel-like, viscous and slimy mucus that forms as a layer or layers covering epithelium cells in various hollow organs, especially all the organs of the alimentary canal."<ref>Anderson, Richard. ''Cleanse & Purify Thyself Book Two''. Christobe Publishing, 2000 page 59</ref>


Though Anderson argues that his beliefs are backed by scientific research, his claims are primarily supported by ] rather than ], and doctors have noted the absence of mucoid plaques. Anderson claims this is due to medical textbooks failing to cover the concept, which results in doctors not knowing what to look for.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight/>
Anderson claims that mucoid plaque is created when the body produces ] to protect itself from potentially toxic substances. Anderson further claims that mucoid plaque acts as a health threat by reducing the absorption of nutrients, impairing digestion, causing sugar intolerance, providing a haven for ], promoting the development of ], causing skin conditions and ], and reducing bowel transit time <!-- speaks for itself /xav-->. Anderson further claims that removing this protective layer is beneficial to health.<ref name="anderson">, by Richard Anderson, from his website cleanse.net. Accessed 21 Feb 2007.</ref>


==Medical evaluation==
== Anderson's Research ==
Practicing ]s have dismissed the concept of mucoid plaque as a ] and a "non-credible concept".<ref name="bjmu"/> A pathologist at the ] School of Medicine addressed Anderson's claims directly, saying that he has "seen several thousand intestinal biopsies and have never seen any 'mucoid plaque.' This is a complete fabrication with no anatomic basis."<ref name="GeorgiaStraight" /><ref name="uthman"/>


Another pathologist, Edward Friedlander, noted that, in his experience, he has never observed anything resembling a "toxic bowel settlement", and that some online photographs actually depict what he recognises as a ].<ref name="friedlander"/> Commenting on claims that waste material can adhere to the colon, Douglas Pleskow, a gastroenterologist at ], stated, "that is the urban legend. In reality, most people clear their GI tract within three days."<ref name=Foreman>{{cite news | first = Judy | last = Foreman | url = http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-he-toxic30-2008jun30,0,4875078.column | title = Beware of colon cleansing claims | work = ] | date = June 30, 2008}}</ref>
Anderson claims that “clinical and anatomical studies from many papers and textbooks have demonstrated that mucoid plaque exists in the alimentary canal.” <ref>Anderson, Richard. ''Cleanse & Purify Thyself Book Two''. Christobe Publishing, 2000 page 60</ref> To support his claim, he cites, among other things, a scanning electron microscope study, which says that “a rather thick layer of mucus” can be clearly seen in the small intestines of children with chronic diarrhea and food intolerance. <ref>Anderson, Richard. ''Cleanse & Purify Thyself Book One''. Christobe Publishing, 2000 pages 36 and 38.</ref>


In a review of websites promoting products that claim to remove 'mucoid rope' or plaque from consumers' intestines, Howard Hochster of ] wrote that these websites are "abundant, quasi-scientific, and unfortunately convincing to a biologically uneducated public." He noted that although such sites are entertaining, they are disturbing in that they promote a belief that has no basis in physiology.<ref name=Hochster>{{cite journal |author=Hochster H. |title="Colon Health" Websites |journal=Current Colorectal Cancer Reports |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=105–106 |year=2007 |doi=10.1007/s11888-006-0027-6 |s2cid=195301831 }}</ref>
He also explains that disorders and physiological entities that the medical community has identified as separate &ndash; i.e. ], gastric ], ], ], intestinal ], ], ], ], ], ] &ndash; are, according to him, "varying aspects" of mucoid plaque.<ref name="anderson"/> In reference to metaplasia and dysplasia, Anderson clarifies that mucoid plaque, itself, cannot become cancerous, but it may “stimulate” cancer growth and become intermingled with it.<ref>Anderson, Richard. ''Cleanse & Purify Thyself Book Two''. Christobe Publishing, 2000 page 79</ref>


Hochster also noted that a preparation marketed to remove mucoid plaque contains laxatives and bulky fibrous ingredients. Thus, the rope-like fecal material expelled from people who consume this product "certainly is a result of the figs and senna in this preparation," rather than any sort of pathologic 'plaque'.<ref name=Hochster/> Other 'colon cleanser' products contain bentonite clay that, when ingested, would also result in production of bulky stools.<ref name=Schwarcz/>
As evidence that mucoid plaque has been around even before his cleanse, he points out a photograph of a “particularly bizarre stool” from a young woman with irritable bowel syndrome on page 155 of a conventional medical book ''Color Atlas of the Digestive System'' (1989).<ref>, by Richard Anderson, from his website cleanse.net. Accessed 5 Nov 2008.</ref>


In many cases, customers purchase supplement products that are said to help the body excrete the so-called 'mucoid plaque'. The customer may consume a number of pills, and then within 12–48 hours, will pass a rope-like fecal material in their subsequent bowel movements. This fecal material is said to be the 'mucoid plaque'. However, analysis of supplements consumed by the customer shows that the active ingredient is very similar to that of clay used in clumping cat litter. This clay takes a negative mould of the large intestine which is then excreted during the customer's next bowel movement. <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4083|title = The Detoxification Myth}}</ref>
Finally, Anderson says that if anybody still doubts the mucoid plaque theory, endoscopy plates numbers 27, 31, 46, 63, and 66 in ''Clinical Gastroenterology'' by Howard Spiro (4th edition) “show obvious mucoid plaque that cannot be denied by anyone.” <ref>Anderson, Richard. ''Cleanse & Purify Thyself Book Two''. Christobe Publishing, 2000 page 88</ref>


==References==
== The Medical Community ==
{{reflist|2}}
A 2004 paper by Soergel, Tse and Slaughter on the relationship between lay and medical language uses "mucoid plaque" as an example of "non-credible concepts" used by healthcare consumers.<ref name="bjmu"/>


{{Naturopathy}}
Edward Uthman, a practicing ] and Adjunct Professor of Pathology at the ] School of Medicine, has said on the basis of having examined several thousand intestinal biopsies: "This is a complete fabrication with no anatomic basis."<ref name="uthman"> Edward Uthman, M.D. Accessed 21 Feb 2007.</ref>
{{Pseudoscience}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Mucoid Plaque}}
Another practicing pathologist, Ed Friedlander of ], states, "As a pathologist, I have opened hundreds of colons and never seen anything like 'toxic bowel settlement'." Furthermore, in reference to purported photos of expelled mucoid plaque, he writes, "Sites they have shared include one depicting what I recognize to be a ]."<ref name="friedlander"> Ed Friedlander, M.D. Accessed 21 Feb 2007.</ref>

== See also ==
* ]
* ]
* ]

== References ==
{{reflist|2}}


] ]
]
]
] ]

Latest revision as of 22:27, 1 July 2024

Pseudoscientific term in alternative medicine
Mucoid plaque
ClaimsClaimed to be a harmful material coating the gastrointestinal tract.
Related scientific disciplinesMedicine
Year proposedEarly 20th century
Original proponentsRichard Anderson
(Overview of pseudoscientific concepts)

Mucoid plaque (or mucoid cap or rope) is a pseudoscientific term used by some alternative medicine advocates to describe what is claimed to be a combination of harmful mucus-like material and food residue that they say coats the gastrointestinal tract of most people. The term was coined by Richard Anderson, a naturopath and entrepreneur, who sells a range of products that claim to "cleanse" the body of such purported plaques.

Many such "colon cleansing" products are promoted to the public on websites that have been described as making misleading medical claims. The presence of laxatives, bentonite clay, and fibrous thickening agents in some of these "cleansing agents" has led to suggestions that the products themselves produce the excreted matter regarded as the plaque. The concept of a 'mucoid plaque' has been dismissed by medical experts as having no anatomical or physiological basis.

History

Various forms of colon cleansing were popular in the 19th and early 20th century. In 1932, Bastedo wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association about his observation of mucus masses being removed during a colon irrigation procedure: "When one sees the dirty gray, brown or blackish sheets, strings and rolled up wormlike masses of tough mucus with a rotten or dead-fish odor that are obtained by colon irrigations, one does not wonder that these patients feel ill and that they obtain relief and show improvement as the result of the irrigation."

While colonic irrigation enjoyed a vogue in the early 20th century as a possible cure for numerous diseases, subsequent research showed that it was useless and potentially harmful. With the scientific rationale for "colon cleansing" disproven, the idea fell into disrepute as a form of quackery, with a 2005 medical review stating that "there is no evidence to support this ill-conceived theory that has been long abandoned by the scientific community." Similarly, in response to claims that colon cleansing removes "toxins", Bennett Roth, a gastroenterologist at the University of California, stated that "there is absolutely no science to this whatsoever. There is no such thing as getting rid of quote-unquote 'toxins.' The colon was made to carry stool. This is total baloney." The preoccupation with such bowel management products has been described as a "quaint and amusing chapter in the history of weird medical beliefs." Nevertheless, interest in colonic "autointoxication" as a cause of illness, and in colonic irrigation as a cure, enjoyed a revival in alternative medicine at the end of the 20th century.

The term "mucoid plaque" was coined and popularized by naturopath and entrepreneur Richard Anderson, who sells a range of products that claim to cleanse the body of such purported plaques by causing them to be eliminated. Anderson describes a mucoid plaque as a rubbery, ropey, generally green gel-like mucus film that covers the epithelial cells of the hollow organs, particularly of the alimentary canal. Anderson also claims the plaque can impair digestion and the absorption of nutrients, hold pathogens, and cause illnesses such as diarrhea, bowel cancer, allergies and skin conditions. Based on these claims, he promotes efforts to remove the plaque, and sells a range of products to this end.

Though Anderson argues that his beliefs are backed by scientific research, his claims are primarily supported by anecdotal evidence rather than empirical data, and doctors have noted the absence of mucoid plaques. Anderson claims this is due to medical textbooks failing to cover the concept, which results in doctors not knowing what to look for.

Medical evaluation

Practicing physicians have dismissed the concept of mucoid plaque as a hoax and a "non-credible concept". A pathologist at the University of Texas School of Medicine addressed Anderson's claims directly, saying that he has "seen several thousand intestinal biopsies and have never seen any 'mucoid plaque.' This is a complete fabrication with no anatomic basis."

Another pathologist, Edward Friedlander, noted that, in his experience, he has never observed anything resembling a "toxic bowel settlement", and that some online photographs actually depict what he recognises as a blood clot. Commenting on claims that waste material can adhere to the colon, Douglas Pleskow, a gastroenterologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, stated, "that is the urban legend. In reality, most people clear their GI tract within three days."

In a review of websites promoting products that claim to remove 'mucoid rope' or plaque from consumers' intestines, Howard Hochster of New York University wrote that these websites are "abundant, quasi-scientific, and unfortunately convincing to a biologically uneducated public." He noted that although such sites are entertaining, they are disturbing in that they promote a belief that has no basis in physiology.

Hochster also noted that a preparation marketed to remove mucoid plaque contains laxatives and bulky fibrous ingredients. Thus, the rope-like fecal material expelled from people who consume this product "certainly is a result of the figs and senna in this preparation," rather than any sort of pathologic 'plaque'. Other 'colon cleanser' products contain bentonite clay that, when ingested, would also result in production of bulky stools.

In many cases, customers purchase supplement products that are said to help the body excrete the so-called 'mucoid plaque'. The customer may consume a number of pills, and then within 12–48 hours, will pass a rope-like fecal material in their subsequent bowel movements. This fecal material is said to be the 'mucoid plaque'. However, analysis of supplements consumed by the customer shows that the active ingredient is very similar to that of clay used in clumping cat litter. This clay takes a negative mould of the large intestine which is then excreted during the customer's next bowel movement.

References

  1. ^ "Colon cleanses thrive despite scant proof". The Georgia Straight. Retrieved 2008-11-05.
  2. ^ Hochster H. (2007). ""Colon Health" Websites". Current Colorectal Cancer Reports. 2 (3): 105–106. doi:10.1007/s11888-006-0027-6. S2CID 195301831.
  3. ^ Joe Schwarcz (April 5, 2008). "I have a gut feeling something's wrong here". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on June 3, 2012.
  4. ^ Soergel, Dagobert; Tony Tse; Laura Slaughter (2004). "Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information" (PDF). MedInfo2004. 107 (Pt 2). IOS Press, Amsterdam: 931–5. PMID 15360949. Archived from the original on July 17, 2011. Retrieved 2012-08-31.
  5. ^ Uthman, Edward (7 January 1998). "Mucoid Plaque". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  6. ^ Friedlander, Ed. "Ed's Guide to Alternative Therapies: Colonics". Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  7. Sullivan-Fowler M (July 1995). "Doubtful theories, drastic therapies: autointoxication and faddism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries". J Hist Med Allied Sci. 50 (3): 364–90. doi:10.1093/jhmas/50.3.364. PMID 7665877.
  8. Bastedo WA (1932). "Colonic irrigations: their administration, therapeutic application and dangers". 98. JAMA: 736. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  9. ^ Ernst, E (June 1997). "Colonic irrigation and the theory of autointoxication: a triumph of ignorance over science". Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 24 (4): 196–198. doi:10.1097/00004836-199706000-00002. PMID 9252839.
  10. Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A (January 2005). "Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation". Am. J. Gastroenterol. 100 (1): 232–42. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40885.x. PMID 15654804. S2CID 8060335.
  11. ^ Foreman, Judy (June 30, 2008). "Beware of colon cleansing claims". Los Angeles Times.
  12. Grady, Denise (May 23, 2000). "Cult of the Colon: From Little Liver Pills to Big Obsessions". New York Times.
  13. Anderson, Richard (2000). Cleanse & Purify Thyself, Books One and Two. Christobe Publishing.
  14. "The Detoxification Myth".
Naturopathy
Practices
Naturopaths
Beliefs
Critics
Related
Pseudoscience
List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
Terminology
Topics
characterized as
pseudoscience
Medicine
Social science
Physics
Other
Promoters of
pseudoscience
Related topics
Resources
Categories: