Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tocino: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:00, 10 November 2008 editAvala (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,962 edits Removing content← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:46, 11 May 2022 edit undoRandomCanadian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers36,695 edits Notification: listing of International reactions to the 2008 United States presidential election at WP:Articles for deletion.Tag: Twinkle 
(242 intermediate revisions by 81 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K |maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 1 |counter = 2
|algo = old(30d) |algo = old(30d)
|archive = User talk:Tocino/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Tocino/Archive %(counter)d
Line 8: Line 8:
{{archives|auto=yes}} {{archives|auto=yes}}


== Template:Donetsk People's Republic topics ==
== ] ==


== Templates for deletion ==
You may be interested to participate in the discussion in ]. It seems anonymous IPs 84.134.xx.xxx are involved exactly as in the case of Jakezing. -- ] (]) 01:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


== Date format for Jorg Haider == == Help with the National Memo article ==


Hi. I noticed that back in 2009 you made an edit to ] article. He is a frequent contributor to ], so I assume that you know this media (and the liberal press) quite well. The article has been undergoing dramatic edits and I ask for your assistance in editing/improving this article.
Hi there. Just a note to ask you not to re-format the dates in the article ]. The original format is dd/mm/yy and should be retained. Cheers. ] (]) 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


I while ago I was asked to make several minor edits to the article as paid editor. At that time the article had minimal content and was no more than a stub. I’ve added some information following the structure of such articles as ], ], ] adding infobox, improving categories and adding some well-referenced info. The article started to look like a normal website/media article. After that it got heavily edited in two waves by editors deleting large chunks of well-written (ok, my personal view :)) and well-referenced information. I believe that some of these edits/deletions are extraneous and actually make the article worse/less useful to Misplaced Pages users. I also believe that The National Memo article has an undisputable notability. There is an interesting discussion about this at the article’s .
== Note ==


A lot of what is going all around this article is plain nonsense. So if you are interested in the subject / in improving the article, please take a look at or . Also if you have any suggestions on improving the article, please share. Thank you in advance. -- ] (]) 21:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Tocino.


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
There is currently a discussion which intimately involves you on ]. I would appreciate it if you could give your thoughts at ].


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Tocino. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
Thank you.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
]]] 17:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
:Hello, J.delanoy. Personally, I don't want to take part in this political lynching. Notice that they have not talked about my edits on articles they just have gotten their feelings hurt by political beliefs. The admin who is leading this charge is a questionable character and I don't want to give credence to his "discussion". --] 17:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
::Well, I cannot force you to comment, but you are only hurting yourself if you do not. The identity of the person who started the conversation is irrelevant. I did not even look at that conversation or any of Husond's reasons before I started looking around. Your assertion that "''They have not talked about my edits they just have gotten their feelings hurt by political beliefs''" is also irrelevant. I came to my conclusions based solely on my own research. Other users' opinions on you did not influence me in the slightest. Your own edits are what caused me to say what I did. I once again ask you to say something in response to my request on the talk page. ]]] 17:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
:::Damn, I was apparently not paying attention too well. I've removed my comments (at least temporarily) from the article's talk page until I have more time to look deeper. Right now I have to go to work in 10 minutes, so I'll see what I can do later. ]]] 17:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
== Hi, please pay attention ==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=866998401 -->


== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
Hi, Mareklug has a point, the template is meaningless there, please show your good will by reverting your edit and we can discuss it at the proper talk page. --] (]) 06:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
:I agree but still you have to raise the issue to include the article in the template in the template's talk page, that's because the minimal requirement for any navigational template to be placed in an article is to include the article itself. Non of us noticed that, i thought it was already included. Can you initiate the procedure in http://en.wikipedia.org/Template_talk:Foreign_relations_of_Serbia ? i'm too tired right now. Invite other editors also to establish consensus. And please don't put it again like this, it has no meaning without the addition i'm speaking of. If you are preparing your defense than save it for when you'll have more time, it can wait. --] (]) 15:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
:See the discussion opened by Mareklug also: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:International_reaction_to_the_2008_declaration_of_independence_by_Kosovo#.7B.7BForeign_relations_of_Serbia.7D.7D--] (]) 15:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
== Kosovo-Nauru ==
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Nice catch. We do have a speedy criterion for that (G4), so it is now deleted. If he continues this best to take it to ]. ] 19:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
== Proposed topic ban ==
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=990308077 -->
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Tocino, I was ] recently about you; the topic ban discussion, I am sure you are well aware of. Its sad when it comes to a point where elected administrators are having to extend or initiate bans on certain people on certain pages because of alleged disruption the said user has conducted - hence why often, the uninvolved administrative opinion is usually key in the outcome of a decision of whether or not it should be implemented or not. I have been in such situations before, and I have evaluted user's edits to the point where I feel I can suitably make a reasoned judgement and made the changes where necessary. Consensus plays it role too, though. I have noted in the past that I feel you did not merit, for want of a better word, a topic ban for your edits; incidentally, with the administrator you mention most in your posts, Husond, ] - back in July. Now, I don't want to be topic-banning (as horrible as it sounds) somebody who had made useful and sometimes good contributions to articles, where they have been appreciated by other editors - as was the conclusion in the comment I linked before. However, the consensus now appears to have changed and the topic ban discussion I first linked, seems to suggest that people now have a different view. I've noted ] as being one, particularly, where there was a highlighted disagreement. So what's happened? I don't want any nonsense about pro-Serbian and pro-Kosovan views, or any other drivel that is irrelevant. What do you think has to be done, and what do you think the problem is? I need an explanation that is clear and isn't full of accusations and so on. If you could suggest ways in which you feel you can improve yourself, that would be welcome. ] 16:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
== Archiving assistance ==
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (] / ]) 23:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Tocino. :) May I set up an archive bot for your talkpage? Currently the page is very long, around 80K, and some people's browsers start having trouble with anything over 32K. But I could set up an automated archiving system for the page, and then you wouldn't have to worry about it anymore? It would automatically archive any threads which had been inactive for a certain amount of time, such as 30 days. Please let me know, --]]] 18:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
: Done! It'll kick in on the next pulse, which will be sometime in the next 24 hours, and then do a daily check after that. I've got it tweaked right now to automatically archive any thread which hasn't had any activity in a month, but I can configure this if you would like something different. And don't worry, it'll never completely empty out the page or anything -- it will harvest threads down to a minimum of five, and then leave things alone unless there's more activity after that. Enjoy, and let me know if you have any questions, --]]] 23:40, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

== San Marino response ==

"Sono convinto che la vittoria del rinnovamento negli Stati Uniti avrà positive ripercussioni sullo scenario internazionale e darà nuova voce, anche in Europa, al desiderio di una nuova politica di riforme che superi il conservatorismo e affermi un nuovo, piu’ moderno ed equo ordine mondiale”. Lo dichiara il segretario agli Esteri della Repubblica di San Marino Fiorenzo Stolfi in occasione dell’elezione di Barack Obama Hussein a presidente degli Stati Uniti.

"I am convinced that the victory of renovation in the US will have positive effects on the international scenario and will give a new voice, also in Europe, to the desire of a reformations policy (''pardon mf, I know it's ugly... hope you caught the meaning...'') which could overcome conservatorism and impose a new, more modern and equal world order." This is the declaration the Foreign Affairs Secretary of Repubblica di San Marino, Fiorenzo Stolfi, in occasion of Barack Obama Hussein's election as President of the United States.

I did my best... of course it'll be needing some cleanup. Thanks and good work. --] (]) 07:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

:I think he means that the victory of renovation in the US will have positive effects on the international... '''and''' will give a new voice to reformations policy. He hopes the latter should impose a new world order. LEt me know for any clarification! Ciao and good work. --] (]) 07:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

== Your page ==

Please remove the nationalist nonsense.] (]) 20:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

== Removing content ==

Please do not remove the content on the statement of the Crown Prince. You are right that Serbia is not a monarchy but that is why he is a Crown Prince not a King. Notice the difference between these two. But still he is recognised as such, he has the right to be addressed as His Royal Highness and is officially entitled to live in the Royal Palace.--] (]) 12:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
:Sorry but the name of that article is not ] but ] and Alexander is an official Crown Prince. He will never become the king unless the constitution is changed through referendum to allow monarchy instead of the republic but it doesn't mean he is any less a Prince. It has got nothing to do with adding the opinion of the opposition leaders which can be added anyway. If you want to add the opinion of communist leaders go ahead because like I said the article name is not Reaction by Governments and the nature of this event is such that it doesn't require official reaction only--] (]) 17:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
::First of all you must show me the link which shows the policy that International reaction is strictly restricted to elected officials. This way it's just your opinion that it shouldn't be added and "I don't like this" removal is forbidden. Secondly it is not the same to Bjork situation as Bjork's opinion is irrelevant for Kosovo recognition which that article in essence deals with while election reaction is simply that, reaction to the even which doesn't create any effect.--] (]) 21:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
:::First of all those Hollywood celebrities you mentioned in summary, they are domestic. Second of all - "fake king" ? I will repeat what you didn't read - He is recognised as Crown Prince, he has the right to be addressed as His Royal Highness and is officially entitled to live in the Royal Palace. He is not a king and it was never implied that he was. Comparing this with Sealand is not serious.--] (]) 21:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
::::President is also per constitution not part of the Government so do you suggest erasing it as well? Reaction by the Crown Prince is a legitimate, relevant reaction from Serbia - simple as that. He doesn't have to be a ruling monarch. We would have included Prince Charles's words if he made a reaction just as well.--] (]) 21:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
:::::I am not mistaken - firstly President is completely separated from the Government and secondly he doesn't have a "host of powers" but couple of ceremonial peacetime duties like receiving credential letters from ambassadors. It is a completely different issue that Tadić is using the situation where his party holds all powers to play Putin and meddle into duties which are not his per constitution (he can do it because obviously he as the leader of the Democratic party which leads the govt which means what he says the govt will fulfill but if the govt was ran by a different party he would be simply blabbering and we see such situation in Poland and Czech R.)--] (]) 21:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
::::::Again like I said before, reactions to the election results unlike reactions to the independence declaration do not require any power behind them because they do not create any effect.--] (]) 11:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:46, 11 May 2022

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2



This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Template:Donetsk People's Republic topics

Templates for deletion

Help with the National Memo article

Hi. I noticed that back in 2009 you made an edit to James Carville article. He is a frequent contributor to The National Memo, so I assume that you know this media (and the liberal press) quite well. The article has been undergoing dramatic edits and I ask for your assistance in editing/improving this article.

I while ago I was asked to make several minor edits to the article as paid editor. At that time the article had minimal content and was no more than a stub. I’ve added some information following the structure of such articles as Salon (website), HuffPost, Politico adding infobox, improving categories and adding some well-referenced info. The article started to look like a normal website/media article. After that it got heavily edited in two waves by editors deleting large chunks of well-written (ok, my personal view :)) and well-referenced information. I believe that some of these edits/deletions are extraneous and actually make the article worse/less useful to Misplaced Pages users. I also believe that The National Memo article has an undisputable notability. There is an interesting discussion about this at the article’s Talk page.

A lot of what is going all around this article is plain nonsense. So if you are interested in the subject / in improving the article, please take a look at January 10th version or January 29th version. Also if you have any suggestions on improving the article, please share. Thank you in advance. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tocino. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of International reactions to the 2008 United States presidential election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International reactions to the 2008 United States presidential election is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2008 United States presidential election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)