| Revision as of 22:04, 10 November 2008 editRoux (talk | contribs)23,636 edits →Bethmans/Rothschilds: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:01, 30 July 2023 edit undoJonteemil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers15,131 edits Notification: speedy deletion nomination of File:Bethm002-4.jpg.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (191 intermediate revisions by 81 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div style="border: #00BFFF solid 1px; margin: 1px; -moz-border-radius: 6px;"> | |||
| == Edit in Franz Liszt article == | |||
| {| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: none;" | |||
| | style="width: 45px; height: 45px; background: none; text-align: center; font-size: 14pt; color: black; border-right: #00BFFF solid 1px;" | <div class="center">]</div> | |||
| | style="font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color:" | This user approves of ]. | |||
| |}</div> | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| {{cquote|'''''Marie d'Agoult's mother was Maria Elisabeth Bethmann, daughter of Johann Philipp Bethmann and Katharina Margarethe Schaaf.'''''}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |||
| |algo = old(14d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Goodmorningworld/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{archive box|]}} | |||
| Then why don't you find a reference and add it, instead of just deleting it? — ] 02:08 ], ] (UTC) | |||
| {| align=center width=65% style="background: #FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #003EBA;" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" | |||
| I did not "just delete it", I explained why the deleted passage was wrong. The Liszt article is very long already and this particular ancestry is tangential at best. Hence my explanation goes into the edit summary but does not clutter up the article.--] (]) 17:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI notification, and some questions == | |||
| Hi there. First of all, I'd like to notify you of an ANI thread involving you ]. {{user|Kimberley Cornish}} should have notified you about this right away, sorry. | |||
| I would also like to ask you about the relationship between you and {{user|Number17}}, since you use that as your sig. It is very confusing. You will see some comments from me about it at the ANI thread. It does not appear you are attempting to engage in ] for purposes of disruption or evading a block, so I think it is all fine... I'm just wondering what gives :) Let me know if you could, either here, or on ], or at the ]. Thanks! --] (]) 18:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I hope you will find my answer at ANI to be sufficient.--] (]) 17:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: ] == | |||
| Thanks for the note. When you say that outside opinions, etc., have been brought to Cornish, are you talking about on-wiki or off-wiki? Since you and she have been arguing on the ], I mostly only see the two of you participating, with a little bit of contribution from {{user|Albion moonlight}}. So that's why I thought a ] (from Wikipedians!) might be helpful. If for no other reason, this helps get enough eyes on it to enforce consensus, should one or more editors resist the consensus. | |||
| One problem I am noticing in the discussion between you and Cornish is that both of you seem to be relying on ''interpreting'' the secondary sources to make a personal assessment of the validity of Cornish's work. Misplaced Pages has policies to discourage/prohibit ] and ] of information that is not directly presented in the sources. Because Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, it seeks to present what third-party sources say in a neutral manner. | |||
| Now, with the philosophy out of the way, down to brass tacks: The article as it stands has major ] problems, and I do believe you are trying to rectify them. I have not read the book, but from a brief perusal of the reviews and the article, I find her thesis both implausible and distasteful. The ''Richmond Review'' article put it nicely when calling the book "learned sensationalism." That seems to summarize the mainstream coverage of the book. | |||
| Yet the article clearly attempts to bury this. The "Reception in Germany and Austria" section touches on this, but fails to actually characterize the overall reception (which is painfully clear after reading the reviews) and even goes so far as to lash back at the reviewers (e.g. "''A review by Kathrin Chod in Berliner Lesezeichen 4/99 reels off, with an increasingly weary air of stunned sarcasm, the conjectures put forward by Cornish. At the end, the reviewer refrains from delivering a coup de grace or even a conclusion, trusting the reader to supply one themselves in light of what has been shown.''" That is so far from neutral, I don't even know what to say!) | |||
| The other problem is the o'erlengthy "Evidence" section. The purpose of the Misplaced Pages is to summarize what the book is about, not to summarize Cornish's argument. The sources referenced do not discuss the book, they are the ''bibliography'' of the book, and that is not the purpose of the Misplaced Pages article (again, this is ] of information from secondary sources to make an argument, which is not encouraged). | |||
| I will raise these issues on the talk page and we'll see where it goes from there. --] (]) 13:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| <blockquote>Thanks for the note. When you say that outside opinions, etc., have been brought to Cornish, are youtalking about on-wiki or off-wiki?</blockquote>Both! See (1) my WikiAnswer discussion with Cornish (btw, Kimberley is a "he"), (2) the continuation on the ], (3) the archived discussion threads at http://groups.google.de/group/humanities.music.composers.wagner, but most importantly (4) the many many fruitless discussions with Cornish over the past several years on the ]. | |||
| The upshot always is the same: discussion with Cornish is useless, he employs a well-honed arsenal made up of "PLAYING STUPID", "MOVING THE GOALPOSTS", "CHILDISH STUBBORNNESS", "INJURED INNOCENCE", until the exasperated counterpart gives up and leaves, all in the service of making sure that he can continue peddling his product unimpeded to a less than savory demographic plus unwary passersby. | |||
| I am sure that in my strolls through the fields of Misplaced Pages, I encountered a page or two that specifically address the problem of '''disingenuous debating tactics''', however, I don't remember where. | |||
| To be clear, it is NOT my aim to "improve", "edit" or "meliorate" the article. Somebody who pens adulatory letters to holocaust denier David Irving and reeks of pathological obsession with Jews, Hitler, and antisemitism is way outside of my ambit. | |||
| I want the article moved to the loony bin, where the Moon Hoax people are. Cornish's refusal to engage in rational debate, where he would have to acknowledge fair points the other side makes, is part of the rationale for the move, the other is the numerous distortions of fact in his book and his online postings. | |||
| The purpose of editing should not be to "correct" the misinformation in his book; that misinformation is there and must be accurately summarized; it cannot be suppressed in a Misplaced Pages article. Cornish wants an article that is an advertorial for him; even a bland recounting of the claims in the book serves his purpose. | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| One problem I am noticing in the discussion between you and Cornish is that both of you seem to be relying on ''interpreting'' the secondary sources to make a personal assessment of the validity of Cornish's work. Misplaced Pages has policies to discourage/prohibit ] and ] of information that is not directly presented in the sources. Because Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, it seeks to present what third-party sources say in a neutral manner. | |||
| </blockquote>Not sure I understand... if you have the time, maybe you could give an example? | |||
| I am shocked that you felt that the new section put in by me about reviews in Germany and Austria "goes so far as to lash back at the reviewers". That was the last thing on my mind when I wrote the summaries! | |||
| What I did was to enter "Kimberley Cornish" as search string into Google, and then extract the top five German-language reviews regardless of content; I merely changed the order to put the oldest review first and the newest last. In writing the review summaries, I tried my best to avoid bias while maintaining a certain stylishness that would give an idea of the reviewer's stance. | |||
| Judging by your reaction, I failed miserably in that regard. | |||
| However, I welcome your criticism and will try to do better. By the way, how do I manage an indent? Thanks!--] (]) 14:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, I misread the discreption of the Berliner Lesezeichen article.. I realized my mistake later, and that's why I left it in. I thought it was saying that the reviewer had not even bothered to make a conclusion, and was just criticizing the book, but I saw when I re-read it what your intention was. My bad. I still think the sentence has ] problems, but the pov problems are in the opposite direction :D Eventually hopefully we can fix it up to read correctly. | |||
| :I didn't realize you had recently added that section. That's like the only thing that even gives a flavor for the actual mainstream reaction to this book, heh... So good start there, really. | |||
| :I have tagged the article as having a "conflict of interest" and I intend to work on it some more. As I mentioned, the Evidence section needs way trimmed back (there is no reason to give a condensed version of the book here) and the article should also make it abundantly clear to the reader what the mainstream press' reaction to this book has been. It will take some time to get the article whipped into shape, though. | |||
| :Oh yeah, and you can do indents by putting one or more colons (:) before your paragraph (each colon is another level of indent). --] (]) 16:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I am afraid that I had to revert your edits as you completely deleted the template code. To edit the instructions, you need to go to this page ] - if you take a look at the existing instructions you will see a little edit link next to that link - clicking on that will take you to the documentation sub-page in edit mode. The thing to remember is that the template page itself (] in this case) contains the code for the template and that should only be edited if you really know what you are doing as any edits affect how the template is displayed on all the pages that use it. Template ''documentation'' is always in a subpage. Hope this helps. – ] (]) 17:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :No, you cannot do it like that. The instructions/documentation are here: ]. You '''must''' make your edits on that page '''not''' on the template main page. – ] (]) 18:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I should have replied earlier at the Help desk. I have reverted your good faith edits. Misplaced Pages has thousands of templates and it's impractical to write documentation for each of them aimed at users who have no idea how templates work. I know such documentation could have benefitted you who apparently happened to come by this template before having tried any other or know anything about how templates work. But the large majority of users will already know template basics and will just be annoyed by having to read through elementary editing instructions to find the relevant information about this particular template. Another thing: As the old documentation said, the template should be placed on the talk page of the article. And linking to the page ] is not so helpful because that page is written for the encyclopedia and is not about Misplaced Pages template. ] would be better. ] (]) 18:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: ] is also a useful link for template basics. – ] (]) 18:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Right, it's better for using templates which produce a message box like this one. Goodmorningworld, I understand why you want to write the documentation like that in view if the time you wasted because you didn't know how to call a template. But very few users, or maybe nobody ever, will go through that experience with ''this'' particular template again. There should be elementarry template instructions for complete beginners somewhere, and there are. You were unlucky to not come by them before trying to use this template. But writing them at tens of thousands of templates is impractical and annoying for the users who read hundreds of template documentations. And writing it only here is arbitrary. I see no reason to guess that this template is especially likely to be the first template a new user comes by. I don't know your previous computing experience but maybe the following analogy will make sense. Imagine a thick set of software manuals which at every of thousands of instances of things like "Press Shift+F1" wrote "Hold down a Shift key while pressing F1. The Shift keys are usually to the right and left of the letters and may display an arrow pointing up instead of text. F1 is a single key usually placed in a row above the digits. It does ''not'' mean to press the letter F followed by the digit 1." Such instructions may be good to have somewhere like an introduction. I have seen people pressing F and 1 instead of F1 which is perfectly logical when they don't know a computer keyboard, and finding out what went wrong may be hard. But I guess you would get pretty tired of having to read past such instructions all the time to get information about what Shift+F1 actully does in the given software. A template documentation may have a link to template basics but I don't think those basics should be repeated all the time. Let's see if we can come to an agreement before involving others. ] (]) 19:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Printed manuals were just an example. Help pages on the screen would maybe have been a better example. ] (]) 23:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| A template can be discussed on the associated talk page like ] (which hasn't been created yet but you could do that). See ] for ways to get other editors involved, but I don't think that is needed yet for this one template. If you want to discuss which general advice ] should give then use ]. I will make a suggested compromise version of ] soon. ] (]) 23:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I have made a new version of the documentation. It includes a link to ] which may be useful to users who don't know templates at all. ] (]) 00:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::It would be possible to not display the orange box at top by wrapping it in includeonly tags (see ]). But doing so would be against Misplaced Pages template practice and annoy many users who expect to be able to quickly see what a template produces when they look at the top of the template page. If a user is for example browsing through ] to find the right template for their purpose then it's practical to have the top display. It's also practical while editing and previewing a template. | |||
| ::The translation box is not important information for usual readers so it should not be on the article, especially when it's so large and in-your-face. The more discreet {{tl|Translated}} may be used at the bottom of articles instead. Authors are not written on articles anyway so readers always have to click something (for example "history") to see who wrote it. And editors adding translated content from another page should say so in the edit summary. | |||
| ::I picked a random French article with a special character in the name, but it has not really been translated. You can click "What links here" in the toolbox at the left of ] to reach ] which shows pages transcluding the template. ] (]) 03:35, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hello there. I removed this template and put it on the talk page as the template says you should do. These sorts of messages are for the editors rather than the readers, which is why it belongs on the talk page. <span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 8pt;">] <span style="font-size: 7pt;">] ]</span></span> 01:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::But how does this template help the reader? Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia first-and-foremost. The editors "work in the background" to create good articles. The article itself should be an article - that is all. The article should simply tell readers what the subject of the article is (i.e. ] talks about dogs), and not the meta-discussion about the article itself. Information that helps editors edit the article should be placed on the talk page, where it does not interfere with the readers' experience with the encyclopedia. If someone wishes to see the editors who contributed to the article, there's a history button - we do not need to have templates which tell users that such a button exists ''on the articles themselves''. | |||
| ::::I don't feel the template is used in such a way that it tells users what is wrong with the article ({{]}}, {{]}}, etc.) nor is it used to enhance the article's quality. Which is why I believe it should be put into the talk page. Readers should not need to know where the article has come from. <span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 8pt;">] <span style="font-size: 7pt;">] ]</span></span> 03:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Firstly, Misplaced Pages is ] and does not have authors on its covers, or printing dates, or publication notes, etc. - the authors are all available in the history tab to satisfy the GFDL. | |||
| :::::Secondly, since de.wiki and en.wiki are largely autonomous, the texts are not translations of each other and they will never represent simple translations of each other. de.wiki and en.wiki have different policies and guidelines to follow, and because of that, they will be essentially more different than just languages. | |||
| :::::Thirdly, regarding the possibly unverified part, use {{]}} or {{]}}. | |||
| :::::Fourthly, for the de.wiki page, {{]}} should be used, as it does not distract the reader, but preserves GFDL information. | |||
| :::::Fifthly, any inclusion of something requires reason, not the opposite (]). You have had two responses requesting removal - from PrimeHunter and myself. I'm sure if I use ] they will agree with the two of us. The template documentation says to put it onto the talk page, but {{]}} can be used on the article itself, as it is much less "in-your-face". Readers want the article, less so the meta-information about the article. <span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 8pt;">] <span style="font-size: 7pt;">] ]</span></span> 19:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I'm getting concerned that you don't quite understand why this template, or the other one, does not belong at the top. The template documentation says to put this at the bottom of the article, in an external links section. The reason for this is so that it is not so in-your-face for readers, who will want the article in detail first. The translation template does not tell the reader that the article has potential problems (such as {{]}}) nor is it a disambiguation link ({{]}}). Hence the first thing the reader would like would be the article itself. I'd like you to read ] and if you still don't quite understand why, I'll be seeking a ]. <span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 8pt;">] <span style="font-size: 7pt;">] ]</span></span> 06:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I saw the discussion here on my watchlist and have also moved the translation message to the external links section where it belongs according to Misplaced Pages established practice and guidelines. You might suggest the new placement somewhere but it's not a good idea to just place it without support. Misplaced Pages works by consensus, and some consistency between articles is also good. Misplaced Pages would have chaos (at least more chaos than already) if every editor just did what they preferred without regards to guidelines and other editors. If you reply then keep the discussion here before it gets spread on 3 user talk pages. ] (]) 12:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::I now see you have created ] with a suggestion. It's unlikely to be seen by many editors there and placing a new type of ] at top of an article seems too principal to start based on an obscure talk page. You might suggest it at ] instead to get broader input, but I guess it would be opposed. ] (]) 13:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Breidenbach== | |||
| I am sorry if you took my words in a wrong manner. There was nothing personal about it and I did not even bother to look who just copied-and-pasted. | |||
| However, I have to stand by my view, even more so since there was an earlier version of the article without the wrong information. Copy and pasting removed not only the bad edits but also the good ones and made the article inferior even to the original version. What you did might be okay if you quickly want to remove the false information, but then you should as soon as possible start to bring the article back into shape. You didn't do that for over three weeks (and your last edit, on 6 August was uncalled for, as the article really needed wikifying - as correctly detected by the bot). | |||
| Don't take it personally but please consider my words in a similar case. | |||
| And thanks for liking my editing. ] ] 20:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the thoughtful reply. We all make mistakes. Nobody's perfect (but Nobody and Mr Perfect of course). ] ] 20:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Copying a Template from Latin Misplaced Pages == | |||
| I have replied on my talk page. ] (]) 23:55, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == A note on deleting pages, re: ] == | |||
| Hi, I have placed a speedy deletion tag on your page ] as you requested that it be deleted in the edit summary when you blanked the page. In future please place a tag from the selection of templates at ] as this will quickly bring the page to the attention of administrators who can delete it for you. --]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 20:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == | |||
| ] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! | |||
| {|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| ! style="background: #5D7CBA; text-align: center;" align="center" | <span style="color: #FFFFFF; font-family: Arial;">'''Please support the AdminReview initiative'''</span> | |||
| |valign=top| | |||
| |- | |||
| ;Stubs:<!--''']:'''--> | |||
| | A new project currently under discussion seeks to provide a way for editors to have valid grievances about individual administrators addressed in a focused manner. Your input is welcome ]. | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| |align=top| | |||
| ;Cleanup | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| ;Merge | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| ;Add Sources | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| ;Wikify | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| ;Expand | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| :] | |||
| |} | |} | ||
| == RfC Invitation == | |||
| SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping. | |||
| If you have '''feedback''' on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on ]. Thanks from ], SuggestBot's caretaker. | |||
| P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on ]. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ] (]) 15:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Hitler and Wittgenstein == | |||
| Hi, Goodmorningworld. I saw your explanation on the talk page and reverted my edit, only to see that you had beaten me to it by a split second or so. Just wanted to let you know. Cheers, ] (]) 12:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == House of Bethmann == | |||
| You are the only editor to make edits to ], so just copy everything from that page to '''{{noredirect|House of Bethmann}}'''. This doesn't require a page move. — ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 01:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Good morning world, <smile> I think, you should try to take this article to a ''featured article'' or at least to a ''good article''. This is a very good article in my opinion. ] (]) 01:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you need help I'm usually available to give a good GA review when needed. --] (]) 22:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{User:Jclemens/RFC invite}} | |||
| == Bethmann Bank == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Sure thing, let me know when it's done being under construction and I'll be glad to rate it again. Let me know if you need any help or have any trouble. --] (]) 17:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 --> | |||
| == History of Christian thought on tolerance and persecution == | |||
| was insightful; thanks so much! - <font face="Verdana">] <sub>]</sub></font> 17:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hello Goodmorningworld! I love that user name! I am boring old Jenhawk777, and I have recently done some major reconstruction on the above mentioned article with the goal of improving its focus on what the title says it's about--Christian thought--broadening and extending its references and hopefully getting a consensus that the tags should be removed. I am going through the talk age contacting anyone who ever demonstrated any care for this article, and I am hoping that hasn't changed. I appreciated the balance and good will in your comments on the talk age there, so I am hoping you will bring that to giving the article a critique. I value your input. Don't be afraid to criticize or correct! Thank you ] (]) 03:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Rotschild ancestry == | |||
| The article does not state that the Rotschild theory is a minority view and dismissed by most serious historians. Could you please reference it? After doing so, please feel free to revert my edits on both pages. Until then, i will have to revert your edit on both the articles. Its better never to get into an edit war. Regards, ] (]) 15:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :See my comments on the Talk page of the articles, let's keep the discussion there.--] (]) 15:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Can you drop by the Alois Hitler article discussion page and answer some more questions on the Rothschild issue? --] (]) 03:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I can but I won't. Both sides have already exchanged their arguments. The case is closed.--] (]) 11:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, no it isn't. You still have not explained why you think the sources that say that Rothschild is Hitler's grandfather, such as Walter Langer, are incorrect. Please go to the Alois Hitler discussion page. --] (]) 06:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Walter Langer never claimed that Rothschild was Hitler's grandfather. Now please stay off my Talk page.--] (]) 14:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Jenhawk777}} I think I said to you once that "hooks are cheap" and indeed you can't loose much by asking. However, when the askee hasn't edited since 2010 I ''personally'' wouldn't bother. ] (]) 19:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your rollback request== | |||
| ::{{u|Gråbergs Gråa Sång}} It's okay. I wasn't expecting everyone I asked to respond, but I do appreciate the heads up! ] (]) 22:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at ]. ] (]) 22:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == You have been pruned from a list == | |||
| == Apollogies == | |||
| '''Hi Goodmorningworld!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at ], but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 6 months. | |||
| I'd like to apologize for my reply to you in the Village Pump area. Criticizing your proposal is one thing, but the personal attack was uncalled for. :-( I'll remove it if you wish. - ] (]) 21:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting ]. | |||
| == Re: Carr == | |||
| '''Thank you!''' | |||
| I saw that it was a bluelink, so I removed it. Granted, now I see that it was to someone else, so that was a messup. ] 03:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 18:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == "Throttle the boid" == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| Well...I went and did it. I killed the little cretin. —<font face="Century Gothic">]</font> <sup>(]•]•])'''</sup> 06:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 12:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Misplaced Pages having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated. | |||
| == Bethmans/Rothschilds == | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-redundantimage-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 03:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| See talk page for the article. ]''' » ]] 22:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:01, 30 July 2023
|
This user approves of smart linking. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
| Please support the AdminReview initiative |
|---|
| A new project currently under discussion seeks to provide a way for editors to have valid grievances about individual administrators addressed in a focused manner. Your input is welcome here. |
RfC Invitation
Within the past month or so, you appear to have commented on at least one AN/I, RS/N, or BLP/N thread involving the use of the term "Saint Pancake" in the Rachel Corrie article. As of May 24th, 2009, an RfC has been open at Talk:Rachel_Corrie#Request_for_Comments_on_the_inclusion_of_Saint_Pancake for over a week. As editors who have previously commented on at least one aspect of the dispute, your further participation is welcome and encouraged. Jclemens (talk) 23:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
History of Christian thought on tolerance and persecution
Hello Goodmorningworld! I love that user name! I am boring old Jenhawk777, and I have recently done some major reconstruction on the above mentioned article with the goal of improving its focus on what the title says it's about--Christian thought--broadening and extending its references and hopefully getting a consensus that the tags should be removed. I am going through the talk age contacting anyone who ever demonstrated any care for this article, and I am hoping that hasn't changed. I appreciated the balance and good will in your comments on the talk age there, so I am hoping you will bring that to giving the article a critique. I value your input. Don't be afraid to criticize or correct! Thank you Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Jenhawk777 I think I said to you once that "hooks are cheap" and indeed you can't loose much by asking. However, when the askee hasn't edited since 2010 I personally wouldn't bother. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Gråbergs Gråa Sång It's okay. I wasn't expecting everyone I asked to respond, but I do appreciate the heads up! Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
You have been pruned from a list
Hi Goodmorningworld! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 6 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Misplaced Pages:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Bethmanns and Rothschilds for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bethmanns and Rothschilds is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bethmanns and Rothschilds (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bethm002-4.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Bethm002-4.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Misplaced Pages having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Jonteemil (talk) 03:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
