User talk:MONGO: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:39, 17 November 2008 editMONGO (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 edits →Redwood National and State Parks: r← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 01:48, 3 December 2024 edit undoYankeepapa13 (talk \| contribs)203 edits →Did you quit?: new sectionTag: New topic
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Ds/aware\|ap\|9/11}}
			{{User active wikipedian for\|year=2005\|month=1\|day=18}}
			{{User Fifteen Year Society}}
			{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
			{{-}}
			{{User:Deckiller/FAC urgents}}
			<font color="ff00000"><big>This is the talkpage of the notorious MONGO! Leave me a message if you dare!</font color="ff00000"></big>
	{\| class="infobox" width="270px"		{\| class="infobox" width="270px"
	\|-		\|-
Line 29:		Line 36:
	]<br>		]<br>
	]<br>		]<br>
	]		]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]<br>
			]
	\|}<!--Template:Archivebox-->		\|}<!--Template:Archivebox-->
	{{Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfA Report}}
	==We have consensus at ]==

			]]]
	... for certain details regarding ], ] and ]. See ]. However, a small but extremely active and dedicated Obama fanboys are trying to ] and sanitize the article. Anyone who tries to aupport ] and revert to the consensus version is threatened, called a sockpuppeteer, etc.
			]... to allege ...]<br/>Sez the French ]</center>]]
			==] nomination of ]==
			]
			{{Quote box\|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>\|width=20%\|align=right}}
			A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a disambiguation page which either
			:::*disambiguates only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a ]);
			:::* disambiguates zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or
			:::*is an ] redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
			Under the ], such pages may be deleted at any time. Please ].

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink\|Special:Log\|qs=type=delete&page=Battlement+Mountain+%28disambiguation%29\|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-disambig-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 07:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	First, this has been an ugly situation for some time and more attention from admins is needed. Second, the Obama fanboys need to be brought under control. They do not own the article. ] means proportionate representation of all significant POVs. The POV that is questioning Obama about his relationships with Wright, Rezko and Ayers is not a fringe POV. Editors who seek to include that POV in a balanced manner are not "Obama haters," and when they agree with one another, they are not sockpuppets. Please help. ] (]) 21:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
	:NPOV in the bio of a political candidate for President sounds like an almost impossible task...and I really can't be of much service. I can monitor the article for vandalism as well as the one on McCain, but that would be the full extent of my ability to contribute to either page.--] 06:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
			<div class="afd-notice">
	::What is there now appears to be balanced. If that is the consensus version he refers to, I can't see why anybody would want to "sanitize" it. --] (]) 22:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	== Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Mammoth Cave National Park/1 ==

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	As one of the people who has over 10 edits at ] and has edited it this year, your attention is needed at ].--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 15:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 16:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	==Fanmail 'Zilla==
	'Zilla huge fan little MONGO way with words! All best dunghills fester, make pleasing cloud hang close over Tokyo! Endangered snacks flavorsome! ] '']'' 08:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC).
	:Heh..if only more editors were as understanding of my wordplay as the ever wise prehistoric dinosaurs and pallid sturgeons are...but surely the gallows have been erected already and I expect to see a hanging before high noon.--] 16:58, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
	==Typo==
	Hey, how's it going? re ... might want to change forment to foment. Cheers! ]<sup>]</sup> 18:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
	:Done...I am notoriously a wowzie speller.--] 20:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
	LOL. :) ]<sup>]</sup> 22:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	==Mongo, stop attacking me==
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 16:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
	Mongo, stop attacking me with your comment on Poupon's page (and please withdraw the comment). Let Lar do his mentoring and if he and the community accepts then I will prove that I am Poupon's socks. (The truth is that I am not Poupon himself but I am related to Poupon's socks). I am trying to come out clean but others are throwing roadblocks. ] (]) 21:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
	:Ya, I think that one speaks for itself. This isn't PoT. PoT said no other sock will be used when he needs to speak for himself. Near as I can tell (and as you know from reading the pages yourself) PoT is not seeking mentorship, either. Just peaceful editing far away from policy pages. ++]: ]/] 21:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	== RFC, Noticeboard or other forum? ==
	For the second time in a short period, ] has decided to follow me to an article and protect it, ostensibly for edit warring but in reality he's supporting trolls whose only interest is harassing me. the relevant talk page discussion. I think the two IP's have a total of 3 edits to Misplaced Pages all of them reverts of me and all of them after Giovanni was banned. I just want him to stop involving himself with me. I guess I could go to the other extreme but I'd prefer he just went his separate way. I asked him to just take my talk page off his watchlist but he refused. I don't really know what his obsession is but supporting trolls and unable to spot them makes him somewhat unsuitable for using the tools the way he has. I figure I can go either noticeboard or RFC. What do you think? --] (]) 04:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
	:Go to the noticeboard and explain why exactly you think that nmy protecting the article in response to a edit war is a bad idea? ]] 04:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
	::Are you really just following me around? --] (]) 05:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::Nope, this page is also watchlisted. Really I haven't followed you to any page, I have simply noticed edit warring and dealt with it. You have a problem with an article you are working on being protected - don't edit war on it. If that is Giovanni (I havent seen any strong evidence to that effect) take it to RFCU and get him blocked, of course if that was the case the protection on the most recent article would of course be lifted. I really do invite you to take it to WP:ANI for review though. ]] 07:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::If that were the case, why didn't you and inform the new users about edit warring and discussing their reverts on the talk page? Do you think that the 2 edit wonder is going to be to resolve any edit war through talk? Or maybe the more plausible answer is that you saw the 3RR warning on my talk page (the warning was for 3 edits over 2 weeks, and the mistaken editor apologized) and you were looking for a reason to block. Failing a legitimate reason you decided to protect the article in a manner that was neither constructive nor likely to result in a resolution since the 3 edit anons goal is only to revert me. The issue isn't this one incident, the issue is that this isn't the first time. I asked you politely to simply stop watching my talk page. There is nothing there for you. I would prefer that instead of you injecting yourself into any editing disputes that you put it on AN/I and let someone else review it. Certainly 3 edits in two weeks is not the kind of hot, urgent edit war that needs immediate article protection. --] (]) 07:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::Please study the following: ], ] and . ]] 11:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::::And as you can see, there is nothing to block for and no reason for you to follow me around looking for stuff. Your unblock had more to do with your desire to wheel war with WMC rather than anything to do with me. Please study and simply leave me alone. It's not hard. Don't read my talk page. If you really want to help with 3RR or edit warring, patrol the noticeboards. --] (]) 19:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::Of course! I have a massive desire to wheel war with WMC. I follow him around too! ]] 21:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::::::Why are you here arguing with a DHeyward on my talkpage? I haven't even been involved in this matter.--] 00:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::::To annoy the living shit out of you of course MONGO - I stalk you too, didnt you know? ]] 03:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::::::::Your admin tools should have taken away long ago.--] 05:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::::::WP:RFARB MONGO go for it! ]] 05:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::::::::::What is your deal, man?--] 05:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::You are full of hollow threats. I really urge you to try and carry one of them out - I have refuted almost every single piece of evidence you and Filll provided at the current RfArb and acknowledged the rest. The majority of that evidence was taken so far out of context as to be uncrecognisable (just like your most recent addition, where you failed to mention that there was significant support for those blocks, just not the length) - you have no evidence whatsoever but continue to trumpet my "involvement in a long standing dispute" with whatever editor you think I have wronged this time. MONGO this is my final request/warning: Either stay well away from me and my actions unless you are DIRECTLY involved or make sure you have a buttload of evidence you are willing to provide to support your claims. Your well poisoning has been noticed. ]] 05:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::::::::::::There was no consensus for this most recent fiasco of yours and indeed to believe there was is simply ridiculous. I have had enough of your threats and warnings and indeed, your behavior on my talkpage, where you followed DHeyward here and first argued with him in regards to an article I have never once edited (and I was offline for a few days to boot)and now presenting this "request/warning" to me is completely out of line for any administrator of this website. If you post your admin actions for review...I will review them. Now I really do think you best move on.--] 05:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::::I didn't say consensus. When posting things for review, I never ever want your input unless I specifically ask for it. Is that quite clear MONGO? ]] 06:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::::::::::::::I will review your actions anytime and anywhere I want to.--] 06:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::::::I have asked you repeatedly to stop, or provide evidence. You have failed on both counts. Please now comment here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#MONGO ]] 06:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::::::::::::::::Viridae, please stop posting here. You have a history of making harassing posts on this talk page Enough is enough. ] <small>]/]</small> 17:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::::::::Seriously...I am fed up with it.--] 15:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	== "Ludicrous" ==
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 16:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	Will do - thanks for bringing this to me. ] (]) 03:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	:I'm not offended and I am not "holding" it against you...just wanted to make sure you knew that those less used to be vilified might see show responses as being hostile. But, I recognize why you would think I am being ludicrous. You're not the only person that thinks that of course!--] 03:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
	::Yeah, attacking somebody's ''argument'' as "ludicrous" is well within my personal conception of civility, but sometimes we can all use a reminder that not everybody shares our personal value systems. ] (]) 03:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	== Final request ==
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 16:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	This is my final request for you to stop commenting on my administrative actions in any way unless you are directly involved. I have repeatedly asked you to provide evidence when you have concerns about my actions, and you continue to fail to provide that. You instead repeatedly show up and poison the well with your unfounded accusations of bias. Because you have been repeatedly asked to stop and have repeatedly failed to do so I consider this harrasment and am asking you one last time to stop or I will take this further down the DR chain. Thankyou. ]] 06:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
	:If you post for review of your admin actions, I WILL review them. I have posted plenty of evidence, as has Felonious Monk and others, about your misuse of tools and position as an administrator at the arbcom case you are named in, so writing me saying I provide no evidence is erroneous. Your two recent blocks were overturned...the comunity did not agree with your rationale and or length of the blocks...and I do read WR..there, a user named Aloft posted a link to the article ], claiming that Crum375 and SlimVirgin were tag team edit warring...you subsequently protected the article page, then blocked Para and Crum375. You then posted these admin actions for review here and went back to WR and posted a link to your review request on ANI stating to "prepare for fireworks"...so you even then suspected that your actions would likely bring arguments. I guess you must think I can't read blogs or look at editing diffs...your blocks weren't based on any reports here at AIV or 3RR...they were based on the long standing theme at WR that Slim and Crum are socks or meatpuppets....and the chance to "get" either simply proved irresistible eh?--] 14:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
	:Viridae...I think if we are going to go do anything about each other, you should wait and see what transpires at the case you are already named in first. If they do nothing, then we can discuss this matter further.--] 15:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	:I believe your answer to my identical request of you was...."no.". I suspect MONGO is now on "double secret probation" for pointing out all of your abusive administrator actions? --] (]) 01:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
	~~::You~~ ~~"suspect"?? WP is ].~~ --] (]) 04:01, 14 July ~~2008~~ (UTC)		<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 17:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
	:::.....--] 04:11, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
			<div class="afd-notice">
	:::: MONGO, I think our friend thinks he is Dean Wormer. --] (]) 05:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	== Semi prot ==

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	If you are beccoming a target again do you want semi prot for a while? How much activity is it getting?]] 02:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 18:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
	:It comes and goes...I don't think semi is necessary at present...thanks though.--] 11:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	== Glacier Advance ==

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	On AN/I you mentioned not being able to find much info about any advancing glaciers. might be helpful. It has info about glacial growth at Mount Shasta and mentions a few other locations which had growth until recently. All localized cases with higher snowfall, itself attributable to climate change, temporarily outpacing increased melting. --] (]) 11:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 18:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
	:Thank you...I did see similar evidence before regarding Shasta...I have plans to update the article on Retreat of glaciers since 1850 and will be adding information as you have mentioned and explanations for such accordingly.--] 05:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	== Rootology ==

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	Yeah, it's a difficult situation. As you know, rootology is hoping to avoid a return to old problems by not interacting with you, as his unblock notice states. he's done right and asked others to intervene rather than reply himself, which is good judgement too.
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 18:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	It's going to be hard for him if he gets addressed with critical or skeptical comments whilst trying to reacquaint himself with editing. That tends to be hard for anybody. I think your point's made, that you have concerns whether he should be considering proposing remedies, but I'd ask that the concern is dropped. It's been stated a few times; doubtless noted too. He'll have a fair chance, same as anyone else unblocked. If you'd be able to avoid interacting with him, it would possibly make it easier on him to avoid interacting back with you as well. If you have concerns about his posts at the RFAR case and they haven't been stated sufficiently, can you consider if they really need saying? He is a fully welcomed back member of the community, he's unblocked, and he's entitled to do all he can to make good contributions and be judged by those alone; it would be easier if he shows by his actions if those are good or otherwise and you and he continue in separate ways.

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	Many thanks, and hoping it works well,
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 18:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
			== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
			<div class="afd-notice">
			<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

			The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
	] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] \| ])</span></sup> 23:45, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
	:I debate that he is "fully welcomed". As far as I am concerned, his past behavior was so shitty that I think he would be best off NOT proposing remedies on someone he had prior disagreements with, certainly not until he has demonstrated over a long time that his intentions here are honorable. I also know you supported rather strongly the recreation of an ED article...the very website that Rootology was so adept at adding his pearls of wisdom to. I will call a spade a spade and if the arbitration committee is now allowing recently unbanned editors to have the arrogance to propose remedies be brought forth on someone they had disagreements with before they were banned, then that is just loony. What the heck is a recently unbanned person...(did you look at the crap this guy put me through at RFAr MONGO...or his ban evading appearance at RFAr Seabhcan as User:XP) doing at arbitration cases????? Are you people going mad? Maybe you need to reevaluate what his rationale for being unbanned is. My understanding is that he was going to stick to article space unless he got into an independent dispute and then needed dispute resolution...not so he could return and propose sanctions on those he had prior dealings with. This is simply bad news and you guys need to look into it. Hint: '''''Recently unbanned editors should do all they can to stay away from arbitration cases'''''...is this some kind of revelation?--] 01:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

			Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
	== "9/11 attacks" dropped "terrorist" ==
			<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] ] 18:41, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

			Glad I have other things to worry about than this website as some folks are hell bent on making it a completely unfun place to be. Nice job ]...you succeeded in getting the articles redirected yet I see the page they redirect to have no further information...only empty headers. The purpose of a stub is so myself or anyone can come along and work to expand it...bandwidth is cheap so deletion is just plain stupid. This is why we have stub tags.--] (]) 11:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
	I have not been following the 9/11-related pages as much as I once did. I did notice that "terrorist" was dropped from the ] article title. Was this done as a finding of fact that the terrorists were not the perpetrators, or did an ideologically like-minded Wiki-mob gather and change the title? ] (]) 23:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
	:I think the title was changed some time ago. The term terrorist is still found in the lead paragraph and surely the radical left and those who want to argue against the UN resolution condemning the attacks as acts of terrorism simply won't let it go. I think I gave up trying to work on the title and stuck just to ensuring that the fact that virtually every single legislative body worldwide condemned the attacks as acts of terrorism, wasn't lost completely. My activity on those articles has also waned significantly.--] 22:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

			== US Mountain West online meeting November 14 ==
	== Greg Kohs aka MyWikiBiz ==

			<!-- Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 08/08/2023 -->
	Thanks for your comment; my god, you need a fucking sense of humour to stay sane here. But even that is sometimes not enough. --]] 22:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
			{\| style="float:right;margin:0 0 0 2em;padding=0;"
	:Heh...I knew you were being sarcastic...I found your comment to be pretty funny!--] 22:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
			\|-
	::I find the politics here utterly yawnworthy, and generally unforgiving. I remember your own request for resysop and IIRC, I supported it. We are working in a pretty fast-moving situation, in which I see RfAs for people I've never even seen around ] and ], which are pretty much talking shops for the usual suspects. I just get on with it. So what if you fucked up six months ago? We all do, but some people do not seem to see beyond that to the general picture that, for example, you were an effective vandal-fighter. Ho hum. --]] 22:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
			\|align=center\|]
			\|-
			\|align=center\|]
			\|}
			] of the ] ] will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at . Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the ] is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see ] for details.

			<span style="font-size:75%;line-height:0em;";>If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our '''{{nobreak\|]}}'''. Thanks.</span>
	== Yellowstone national park dates ==
			{{clear}}-] (]) 17:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US_Mountain_West/Invitation_list&oldid=1183372711 -->

			== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
	You reverted edits on 1877 vs. 1872, and on October 1 vs. October 2, from an IP editor, with respect to ]. Consistent with research about the effect of IP editor changes, I tend to believe that IP editors have accuracy on their side. What's going on? How could an IP editor be convinced that the article's statements were wrong? At a minimum, i think edit summaries responding to the IP editor's views, and/or suggesting what they need to provide, would be helpful. Cheers, ] (]) 02:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
	:Huh...I fixed your linked article...I haven't edited that article since July 12th...please provide a link to where I reverted apparent vandalism if you expect me to understand what you posting about.--] 15:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	== Yo ==
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2023\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	What's up MONGO. Are you still only pawn in game of life? ;) --] (]) 20:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
	:Pretty much...more so now than ever it seems. Hope all is good with you!--] 18:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
	== 9/11 article ==

			</div>
	Hi Mongo could you explain your reasoning for deleting text from the talk page of this article Single purpose account IMO is not a reason thanks. <strong>]</strong>] 13:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
			</div>
	:He beat me to it (My connection is too slow.) Read ] - that screed was a huge morass of commentary about the ''subject'' which could not possibly help improve the ''article''. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 -->
	::Precisely. That article only has potential for becoming featured level if we eliminate the neverending conspiracy theory nonsense that is continuously plastered on the talk pages by single purpose accounts whose sole mission is disruption of the known evidence.--] 13:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
	:::Great thanks for clarifacation but he didn't state ] no harm no foul. <strong>]</strong>] 13:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
	::::Yeah its easy to look back at edit summaries and think, should have said, violation of TPG by SPA, but ah well. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
			{{ombox
	::::My original removal was summarized ...read about ] and check out the edits by that IP and the other user...all to the same page. The IP is likely that of banned user ] .--] 13:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
			\| name = First Edit Day
			\| image = ]
			\| imageright = ]
			\| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
			\| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			\| plainlinks = yes
			\| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi MONGO! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 02:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
			}}

	== ~~Infobox~~ ~~Protected~~ ~~area~~ ~~coordinates~~ ~~broken~~ ==		== U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting ==

			{\| style="float:right;margin:0 0 0 2em;padding=0;"
	I have recently fixed a couple if instances of {{tl\|Infobox Protected area}}, () where the display was horribly broken because no seconds had been entered in the coordinates. The only way to resolve the problem in the short term was to add zero seconds, but this is obviously not an optimal solution.
			\|-
			\|align=center\|]
			\|-
			\|align=center\|]
			\|}
			] of the ] ] will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 13, 2024, at . Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the ] is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see ] for details.

			<span style="font-size:75%;line-height:0em;";>If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our '''{{nobreak\|]}}'''. Thanks.</span>
	] over two weeks ago, but no-one has responded. Since you recently edited the template (not that I think you caused the problem) and obviously have better template coding skills than I, can you fix it, please? Thank you. ] (User:Pigsonthewing); ]; ] 07:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
	:I just went and restored it to my last edit at the template. Hopefully that will fix the problems. Sometimes changes to some of the embedded parameters such as the coordinates impacts the infoboxes. I've been pretty busy lately so I must have missed yours and others comments at the template talk page....let me know if you have any other issues.--] 01:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

			Sent by ] (]) 17:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
	== Thank you ==
			<!-- Message sent by User:EN-Jungwon@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US_Mountain_West/Invitation_list&oldid=1201487731 -->

			== Wikimedia U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting ==
	Thanks for helping out with the ] article, especially since I know your Misplaced Pages time is limited nowadays. It always helps a lot to have others go over details. Cheers. --] <small>(])</small> 01:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
	:No problem...I hope I got some things touched up, but since I am a little rusty on MOS I am a bit apprehensive to do too much. The article looks great but I didn't "vote" to get it to FA level yet...you and ] have done a great job.--] 01:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

			{\| style="float:right;margin:0 0 0 2em;padding=0;"
	== Covered bridges ==
			\|-
			\|align=center\|]
			\|-
			\|align=center\|]
			\|}
			] of the ] ] will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 14, 2024, at . Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the ] is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see ] for details.

			<span style="font-size:75%;line-height:0em;";>If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our '''{{nobreak\|]}}'''. Thanks.</span>
	My sources on covered bridges are almost all specific to Pennsylvania. I found this possible book source in Howard, A., Covered Bridges of Virginia, Village Press, Unionville, CT, 1999. Sorry not to know more, ] ''']''' 03:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
			{{clear}}
	:Ooo...well, I am going to look that one over this week...thanks for the lead. When I was last in Pennsylvania, I saw a number of covered bridges in Lancaster County. Thanks again.--] 04:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
			] (]) 07:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
	::I searched on Amazon.com and found a few more books: Covered Bridges in Virginia: Nine Old Ladies in the Slow Lane by Leola, B. Pierce; A portfolio of covered bridges of Virginia: Wooden bridges standing in 1987 by Joe Nutt; and Covered bridges of Maryland and the Virginias: An illustrated guide by Edward Reichert. Not sure if it would be in Covered Bridges Across North America by Joseph Conwil or not. Fun with InterLibrary Loan.
			<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US_Mountain_West/Invitation_list&oldid=1216028267 -->
	::I also figure the bridge is in the ], so try looking in . Ram-Man has done nice articles and a list for all the Lancaster County bridges. ] ''']''' 01:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
	:::Not sure how I missed this before, but the ] is on the ]. There are 18 pages of data on the bridge, 4 pages of drawings, 25 black and white and 1 color photgraphs . My understanding is that all HAER work is PD US Government too. I did not read it all, but it looks like there is enough there to get the article to FA. ] ''']''' 23:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

			== Rescheduled online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West 05/21/2024 ==
	== ] ==
	Mongo, Marskell and I are working our way through ], identifying articles that can be moved off the list without the need for a ]. Redwoods needs only some minor attention: would you be able to tweak it back to a shining state? I installed the toolbox on the talk page: it shows dab links that need repair and some dead sources and external links. There is a very minor bit of unsourced text that you might also hit. Best regards, ] (]) 00:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
	:It may be a few days, but will look into this. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.--] 23:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
	::Nice job, I followed your edits on the article and used some of the information for de-WP. And I found ] in the digital archive of the NPS recently. Would you like to use it? I think most of the images in the article are too brightly lit and don't give an adequate impression of the forest, that's why I was happy for this one with a low key. Greetings --] ] 11:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
	:::Maybe we can replace one image that we have with that one...feel free to do so if you please. I think the article needs a couple more pieces of fine tuning yet, but hopefully I have done close to what I need to for now to keep it at FA level. I need to learn German one of these days. Thanks for your feedback.--] 23:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

			The online meeting of the ] of the ] ] originally scheduled for May 14 has been rescheduled for 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 21, 2024, at . Please see ] for details.
	== Response to your RFAr statement ==
	You said:
	:''Alecmcconroy appears to be overinvolved in "fixing" what he perceives as problems...yet has added little to nothing as far as encyclopedic material for the bulk of this entire year. I think the arbitration committee needs to cease considering any cases brought forth from what can arguably be easily seen as editors who are here for little other than harassment and creating drama.--] 00:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)''

			<span style="font-size:75%;line-height:0em;";>If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our '''{{nobreak\|]}}'''. Thanks.</span>
	MONGO, I know you have a problem with me, but please respect-- I am not your enemy, I am not SV's enemy. You both contribute to the project in ways I never, never could-- in terms of both volume of contributions and quality. I do and have made substantial article-space contributions (just these week I did a snazzy diagram for the WAIS-III in fact), but there's no doubting that my contributions are a firefly compared to the brilliant sun that is the contributions offered by someone like SV.
			- ] (]) 05:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US_Mountain_West/Invitation_list&oldid=1224065058 -->

			== An invitation to a U.S. Mountain West online meeting ==
	But when you respond to legitimate concerns by personal attacks against the messenger, you don't help anything. The fact is, SV is in trouble. She need to tweak her behavior, before she gets into a problem so big that she's beyond help.

			<!-- Online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West 05/21/2024 -->
			{\| style="float:right;margin:0 0 0 2em;padding=0;"
			\|-
			\|align=center\|]
			\|-
			\|align=center\|]
			\|}
			The Misplaced Pages users of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming are invited to an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 13, 2024, at . Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the ] is encouraged to attend. There is no obligation to participate and all guests are welcome. Please see ] for details.

			<span style="font-size:75%;line-height:0em;";>If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our '''{{nobreak\|]}}'''. Thanks.</span>

			] (]) 00:52, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
			{{clear}}
			<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US_Mountain_West/Invitation_list&oldid=1231135187 -->

			== ] under Featured Article Review ==

			I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 21:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

			== Online meet - November 12, 2024 ==

			{\| style="float:right;margin:0 0 0 2em;padding=0;"
			\|-
			\|align=center\|]
			\|-
			\|align=center\|]
			\|}
			We will host an online meet for ] from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 12, 2024, at . We will have reports from ]. We hope to organize a ] to support local activities. Anyone interested in the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the ] is encouraged to attend. Help is available for new users, and all guests are welcome. Please see ] for details.

			<span style="font-size:75%;line-height:0em;";>If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our '''{{nobreak\|]}}'''. Thanks.</span>
	Once upon a time, a long long long time back, I tried to help you that way. I asked for help somewhere-- ANI or RFC or somewhere, asking for others to help you realize you needed to change things. You are a great contributor, a workhorse, and if you had gotten the right feedback, you'd probably be sitting on Arbcom or the Foundation Board today. Unfortunately, your friends felt it was more important to support you through thick and thin, and to dismiss those who had been stung by your words as having a flawed character and you as being free of any problems at all. Ultimately, however, because your friends didn't help you, you wound up stepping on too many toes.
			{{clear}}
			] (]) 17:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US_Mountain_West/Invitation_list&oldid=1255440377 -->

			== Did you quit? ==
	SV needs that kind of help now. Attacking my character isn't going to solve anything-- but it makes things much worse for her. It perpetuates the myth that the only people who have a problem with some of her behavior are people who have great character flaws. If you try hard enough to convince her that's true, she's liable to believe you, and keep on truckin' until she does something that nobody can ignore.

			I noticed that you last edited over a year ago. Did you quit? Or what? I was going to invite you to edit the ]. ] (]) 01:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
	Again, I'm sorry for whatever mistakes I've made in dealing with you in the past that have led you to be so sour on me. As I was writing out my little post on RFAr, I almost put in as a wikicomment "Insert MONGO's claim I'm a bad editor here", but I decided that would be way too snarky, so I didn't. But the point it, yeah, I know you feel I'm a bad editor, Arbcom knows you feel I'm a bad editor, and pretty much everyone else who knows both our usernames probably knows too. If reciting that sentiment is cathartic, maybe it does some good. But I know it does a lot more bad-- it makes it all the harder for the community to decide to return your admin bit, and it makes it harder for SV to see that she's messing up and need a change. --] (]) 10:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
	:I believe my arbcom comment as you have pasted above is accurate.--] 21:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:48, 3 December 2024

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:

post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people

They should not be given alerts for those areas.

MONGO has been active on Misplaced Pages for 19 years, 11 months and 23 days.

This user has been editing Misplaced Pages for more than 15 years.

This user received the Editor of the Week award.

FACs needing feedback view • edit
How You Get the Girl	Review it now
2007 Greensburg tornado	Review it now

This is the talkpage of the notorious MONGO! Leave me a message if you dare!

Speedy deletion nomination of Battlement Mountain (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Battlement Mountain (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 07:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Cirque Lake (Teton County, Wyoming) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cirque Lake (Teton County, Wyoming) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cirque Lake (Teton County, Wyoming) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 16:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Lake Taminah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lake Taminah is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lake Taminah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 16:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Talus Lake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talus Lake is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Talus Lake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Ramshead Lake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramshead Lake is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ramshead Lake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 16:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Mink Lake (Teton County, Wyoming) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mink Lake (Teton County, Wyoming) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mink Lake (Teton County, Wyoming) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 17:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Snowdrift Lake (Wyoming) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snowdrift Lake (Wyoming) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Snowdrift Lake (Wyoming) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 18:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Rimrock Lake (Wyoming) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rimrock Lake (Wyoming) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rimrock Lake (Wyoming) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 18:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Mica Lake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mica Lake is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mica Lake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 18:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kit Lake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kit Lake is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kit Lake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 18:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Grizzly Bear Lake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grizzly Bear Lake is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Grizzly Bear Lake (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 18:41, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Glad I have other things to worry about than this website as some folks are hell bent on making it a completely unfun place to be. Nice job dlthewave...you succeeded in getting the articles redirected yet I see the page they redirect to have no further information...only empty headers. The purpose of a stub is so myself or anyone can come along and work to expand it...bandwidth is cheap so deletion is just plain stupid. This is why we have stub tags.--MONGO (talk) 11:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

US Mountain West online meeting November 14

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!
Hi MONGO! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Wikimedia U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 14, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Rescheduled online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West 05/21/2024

The online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West originally scheduled for May 14 has been rescheduled for 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 21, 2024, at meet.google.com/wbg-wgws-sbj. Please see our new meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

An invitation to a U.S. Mountain West online meeting

Wikimedia US Mountain West

The Misplaced Pages users of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming are invited to an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. There is no obligation to participate and all guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Misplaced Pages:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Shoshone National Forest under Featured Article Review

I have nominated Shoshone National Forest for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. George Ho (talk) 21:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Online meet - November 12, 2024

Wikimedia US Mountain West

We will host an online meet for Misplaced Pages users from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 12, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. We will have reports from WikiConference North America 2024. We hope to organize a North American Hub to support local activities. Anyone interested in the future direction of Misplaced Pages and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Help is available for new users, and all guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our invitaion list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Did you quit?

I noticed that you last edited over a year ago. Did you quit? Or what? I was going to invite you to edit the Mann Gulch fire. Yankeepapa13 (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)