| Revision as of 06:09, 3 December 2008 editDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 edits Creating deletion discussion page for User:Daedalus969/Roland Nicholson. (TW) | Latest revision as of 18:25, 8 April 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background-color: #E3D2FB; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to nominate a miscellany page for deletion, you must manually edit the MfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''Delete.''' ] (]) 13:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
| I originally moved(copy/pasted) this article here so that the original creators could work on sourcing it and such. After a few edits, it seems like they completely abandoned the project. If they aren't going to work on the article to bring it up to WP standards, I have no reason to keep it in my userspace. Opinions? — ''']]<sup> ]</sup> /<sub>]</sub>''' 06:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | I originally moved(copy/pasted) this article here so that the original creators could work on sourcing it and such. After a few edits, it seems like they completely abandoned the project. If they aren't going to work on the article to bring it up to WP standards, I have no reason to keep it in my userspace. Opinions? — ''']]<sup> ]</sup> /<sub>]</sub>''' 06:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' userfied for the purpose of expansion, in the eight month's since then two minor edits have been made to the page. Host wants it gone, no reason to keep. ] (]) 06:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Sentenced to deletion''' - //] ] <small>] 11:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| *'''Delete''' Per Icewedge. If it's not going to be expanded and brought up to a standard where it can be added as an article, there's no need to just keep it there. If anyone's interested, it can be created again properly. ] ] 12:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 18:25, 8 April 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 13:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Daedalus969/Roland Nicholson
I originally moved(copy/pasted) this article here so that the original creators could work on sourcing it and such. After a few edits, it seems like they completely abandoned the project. If they aren't going to work on the article to bring it up to WP standards, I have no reason to keep it in my userspace. Opinions? — Dædαlus /Improve 06:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete userfied for the purpose of expansion, in the eight month's since then two minor edits have been made to the page. Host wants it gone, no reason to keep. Icewedge (talk) 06:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sentenced to deletion - //roux editor review 11:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per Icewedge. If it's not going to be expanded and brought up to a standard where it can be added as an article, there's no need to just keep it there. If anyone's interested, it can be created again properly. Chamal 12:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.