Misplaced Pages

User talk:Coren: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:27, 17 December 2008 editEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 editsm Caveat arbiter?: tweaking← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:52, 10 July 2024 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors375,582 edits Notification: listing of Template:Csb-day at WP:Templates for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{usertalkheader}} {{Talk header}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(7d)
|minthreadsleft = 1
|archive = User talk:Coren/Archive/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
|algo = old(3d)
|archive = User talk:Coren/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
}} }}

{{AutoArchivingNotice|age=3|dounreplied=yes|bot=MiszaBot|botlink=User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo}}
{{/Archives}} {{/Archives}}


== ''Bots Newsletter'', December 2021 ==
== Question ==


{|style="box-sizing:border-box;background:#f0f8ff; border:1px solid #7Cb9e8; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius:8px;" role="presentation"
Hi Coren, question for you . Cheers, <font color="Brown">]</font> <small><sup><font color="darkgreen">]</font><font color="Light green">]</font></sup></small> 07:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|''Bots Newsletter'', December 2021
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | ]
{{Image frame
| caption = BRFA activity by month
| content =
{{Graph:Chart
| type = stackedarea
| width = 200
| height = 100
| xAxisAngle = -70
| colors =
#98fb98,
#fb9898,
#9898fb,
#a0a6b0
| x = Sep 19,Oct 19,Nov 19,Dec 19
| y1 = 5,10,3,7
| y2 = 2,0,0,1
| y3 = 2,0,1,0
| y4 = 0,0,0,2
}}
}}
Welcome to the eighth issue of the English Misplaced Pages's ''Bots Newsletter'', your source for all things ]. Maintainers disappeared to parts unknown... bots awakening from the slumber of æons... hundreds of thousands of short descriptions... these stories, ''and more'', are brought to you by Misplaced Pages's most distinguished newsletter about bots.


Our ] was in August 2019, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. Due to the vast quantity of things that have happened, the next few issues will only cover a few months at a time. This month, we'll go from September 2019 through the end of the year. I won't bore you with further introductions — instead, I'll bore you with a newsletter about bots.
== ARCA ==


<span style="font-size:125%">'''Overall'''</span><br />
Please note that Noah Charney, Director of the Association for Research into Crimes against Art, has authorized his website content to be used on wikipedia for the advancement of knowledge into art crimes and theft. Please feel free to contact Director Charney at director.arca@gmail.com with any questions you might have. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
* Between September and December 2019, there were 33 ]s. Of these, {{yeac}} 25 were approved, and 8 were unsuccessful ({{nayd}} 3 denied, {{idkc}} 3 withdrawn, and ] 2 expired).


<span style="font-size:125%">'''September 2019'''</span>
Best Regards,
]
Jason L. Sparks <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ], ] · {{idkc}} ], ]
*'''TParis goes away, UTRSBot goes kaput''': ] ] that ] for maintaining on-wiki records of ] appeals stopped working a while ago. ], the semi-retired user who had previously run it, said they were "unlikely to return to actively editing Misplaced Pages", and the bot had been vanquished by trolls submitting bogus UTRS requests on behalf of real blocked users. While ] was a potential fix, neither maintainer had time to implement it. TParis offered to access to the UTRS WMFLabs account to any admin identified with the WMF: "I miss you guys a whole lot but I've also moved on with my life. Good luck, let me know how I can help". Ultimately, ] ended up in charge. Some progress was made, and the bot continued to work another couple months — but as of press time, UTRSBot has not edited since November 2019.
*'''Article-measuring contest resumed''': The ], which had lain dead for several years, was triumphantly resurrected by ] following a ].


<span style="font-size:125%">'''October 2019'''</span>
:Please read ] permission to use copyrighted works on Misplaced Pages. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with ], ] and avoid ]. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 13:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
*'''Curb Safe Charmer adopts reFill''': ] ] that ]'s bug reports were going unanswered; creator ] had retired from Misplaced Pages, and a maintainer was needed. As of June 2021, ] had ], saying: "Not that I have all the skills needed but better me than nobody! 'Maintainer' might be too strong a term though. Volunteers welcome!" <br />


<span style="font-size:125%">'''November 2019'''</span>
== Jive Aces ==
]
* {{yeac}} ], ], ] · {{idkc}} ]
*'''Old bots do new tricks''': ] prowled redirects, ] archived ] requests, and ] removed links to ] deleted at ] (until its authorization was revoked in January at operator ]'s ]).


<span style="font-size:125%">'''December 2019'''</span>
Cirt tells me you were responsible for deleting the Jive Aces entry recently. I understand the reason given was lack of referenced articles implying insufficient notability. I have subsequently found the following, and therefore request that the entry be reinstated. Many thanks:
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ] ·] ], ]
*'''Redirects to be autopatrolled''': A ] at ], closing with unanimous consensus that new ] should be ] by bot. ] wasted no time, and submitted ] the next day; it passed two days after that.
*'''200,000 bios get short descs''': Along a similar vein, ] was approved to remove disambiguation pages from ] and a new bot (]) changed lots of ] links to ] using ]. One particularly neat task, ], automatically generated ] for more than 200,000 biographies.


<span style="font-size:150%">'''In the next issue of ''Bots Newsletter'':'''</span><br />
- http://www.retroradar.com/keely-smith-and-the-jive-aces/ <br />
What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
- http://www.thisissussex.co.uk/entertainment/Jive-Aces-Royal-Victoria-Hall-Theatre-Southborough/article-500815-detail/article.html<br />
*What happens when two bots want to clerk the same page?
- http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:jcfrxqujldse<br />
*What happens when an adminbot goes hog wild?
- The International Who's Who in Popular Music 2002 (see listing for Ian Clarkson, Jive Aces frontman) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gZIjT8PgJMEC&pg=PA97&lpg=PA97&dq=%22jive+aces%22+encyclopedia&source=web&ots=XyV-iKS83V&sig=XrbOFgQI8UtwJwBFts2GTdDtgDs&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=13&ct=result<br />
*Will reFill ever get fixed?
- a collection of past articles, none of which appear to be live any more (all archived and readable for a fee it appears) but it does at least givw the publication and date http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4518014.html<br />
*What's up with ], anyway?
- This confirms that they were awarded the City of Derry International Music Award http://www.derrycity.gov.uk/Press%20Releases/020507-jiveaces.htm<br />
*Python 3.4 deprecation? In ''my'' PyWikiBot? (It's more likely than you think!)
- http://2008.montreuxjazz.com/concerts/artists_details_fr.aspx?id=751<br />
These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the January 2022 ''Bots Newsletter''. Tune in, or miss out!
- http://www.tbnweekly.com/editorial/local_entertainment/concerts/content_articles/120407_leconcert-02.txt<br />
- Newcastle Evening Chronicle http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_6783/is_2007_Jan_10/ai_n28397674<br />
- On the bill of the BBC's Children In Need annual fund-raiser http://www.bbc.co.uk/cambridgeshire/content/articles/2006/11/07/cin_duxford_event_evening_feature.shtml<br />
- On Hungarian TV http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW8TwoZBaHo&feature=related<br />
] (]) 10:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
:You can simply write a new article in your userspace (like at ]) and bring it to ]; if notability is established, then it'll be moved to mainspace. &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 13:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


Signing off... ''']'''×''']''' 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
== History of the National Health Sevice ==
----


<small>(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from ].)</small>
Hi. Just a note to say that I am trying to sort out the present article by creating separate article about the History of the NHS in England, Wales and Scotland. Initially I have moved most material to a new article (which appears similar for a few minutes!) but it will change. Cheers ] (]) 22:51, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Bots/Spam&oldid=1059552212 -->


== Bots Newsletter, January 2022 ==
==Caveat arbiter?==

I was encouraged by your somewhat bold and certainly frank comments in the context of the recently concluded election for members of the Arbitration Committee.
{|style="box-sizing:border-box;background:#f0f8ff; border:1px solid #7Cb9e8; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius:8px;" role="presentation"
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|''Bots Newsletter'', January 2022
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | ]
{{Image frame
| caption = BRFA activity by month
| content =
{{Graph:Chart
| type = stackedarea
| width = 200
| height = 100
| xAxisAngle = -70
| colors =
#98fb98,
#fb9898,
#9898fb,
#a0a6b0
| x = Jan 20,Feb 20,Mar 20,Apr 20,May 20,Jun 20
| y1 = 3,6,12,13,14,11
| y2 = 2,1,0,1,3,1
| y3 = 0,0,0,0,1,1
| y4 = 0,0,1,1,0,0
}}
}}
Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Misplaced Pages's ''Bots Newsletter'', your source for all things ]. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Misplaced Pages's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.

Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost ''two'' years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.

<span style="font-size:150%">'''Overall'''</span><br />
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 ]s. Of these, {{yeac}} 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with {{nayd}} 8 denied, {{idkc}} 2 withdrawn, and ] 2 expired).

<span style="font-size:125%">'''January 2020'''</span>
{{multiple image
| total_width = 400
| height1 = 60
| height2 = 60
| height3 = 60
| height4 = 60
| image1=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus).jpg | alt1=A python
| image2=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus).jpg | alt2=A python
| image3=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus).jpg | alt3=A python
| image4=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus) (cropped to 40%).jpg | alt4=0.4 pythons
| footer = Yeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.
}}
* {{yeac}} ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ], ]
*A new ] release dropped support for ], and it was expected that support for ] would be removed in coming updates. ] itself planned to drop Python 2 support in 2022.
*Two new bots dropped in January 2020: ], the successor to ], and ], whose task was to perform a weekly update of four "massive" wikitables for ].
*], an ] operated by ] since 2006, was ] after going berserk on categories that hadn't yet been ]'d.


<span style="font-size:125%">'''February 2020'''</span>
In my view, your observations represented a constructive step forward in a number of on-going discussions in which too much is left unsaid. They say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but I don't know that I'm quite ready for that. I admit that I liked the tone, but I'm still pondering the substance. --] (]) 20:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
]
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ]
*On February 1, some ] were raised about ] performing "nonsense" edits. Semi-active operator ] (who originally coded the ] of ]) was pinged. Meanwhile, the bot was temporarily <span class="plainlinks"></span> for several hours until the issue was diagnosed and resolved.
*On February 18, ] got into a <span class="plainlinks"></span> with ], and had to be partially-blocked from ].


<span style="font-size:125%">'''March 2020'''</span>
== Merry Christmas! ==
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] ·] ]
* In March, a long ] was started at ] by ] about the troubling trend of bots "expiring" without explanation after their owners became inactive. This can happen for a variety of reasons -- ] changes break code, hosting providers' software updates break code, hosting accounts lapse, software changes make bots' edits unnecessary, and policy changes make bots' edits unwanted. The most promising solution seemed to be ] hosting (although it has some problems of its own, like the occasional necessity of refactoring code).
* Some of the twelve bot tasks approved this month were ] (removing blocked users from ]), and ] (removing ''unblocked'' users from ]). ] was approved to refine geographic stub tags. New bots approved this month were ] (to patrol ]), ] (to merge stub tags), and ] (fixing DISPLAYTITLE modifications, DEFAULTSORT errors and broken behavior switches in ]).
<span style="font-size:125%">'''April 2020'''</span>
]
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ] ·] ]
*A ] on the bot noticeboard, "Re-examination of ListeriaBot", was started by ], who pointed out repeated operation outside the scope of its BRFA (i.e. editing pages in mainspace, and adding ] to others). Some said it was doing good work, and others said it was operating beyond its remit. It was <span class="plainlinks"></span> on April 10; the next day it was unblocked, reblocked from article space, reblocked "for specified non-editing actions", unblocked, and indeffed. The next week, several ] were implemented in its code by Magnus; the bot was allowed to roam free once more on April 18.
*] joined the stable in April, after a BRFA started in December was finally completed. As an adminbot, it was authorized to block ]es belonging to ], public ]s, and ]s. New tasks approved for existing bots included ] (] categories), ] (taking over some tasks from the inactive ]), and ] (updating data at {{tl|Interactive COVID-19 maps}}). Also, ] was approved to scale down non-free ]s — I didn't even know that was a thing.
* A ] at ] was started by ] about whether ] should explicitly specify that bot operators must be responsive to concerns raised on English Misplaced Pages specifically (as opposed to ], ], ], et cetera). Eventually, the policy was amended to its ]:
:<blockquote>Issues and enquiries are typically expected to be handled on the English Misplaced Pages. Pages reachable via ], like a talk page at ] or at ] could also be acceptable External sites like ] or ] (which require separate registration or do not allow for IP comments) and email (which can compromise ]) can supplement on-wiki communication, but do not replace it.</blockquote>


<span style="font-size:125%">'''May 2020'''</span>
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
]
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ], ], ] · {{idkc}} ]
*], an impressively meta bot task, was approved this month for maintaining a list of bots running on the English Misplaced Pages. The page, located at ], is updated every 24 hours; it contains a list of all accounts with the bot flag, as well as their operator, edit count, last activity date, last edit date, last logged action date, user groups and block status.
*Other approvals for this month were ] (processing redirects in {{tl|R from scientific name}}), ] (allowing users to schedule bot reminders for themselves), ] (removing blocked/locked users from ]), ] (updating ]), ] (adding <nowiki>{{</nowiki>]|living=no<nowiki>}}</nowiki> to talk pages where their associated article is in a year of death category), and ] (deleting and nominating empty categories).
*General syntax fixing tasks were approved for ], ], ], ], ], and ], as well as ] ], ], and ].
*Seven bots who fell below ] (with neither the bots nor their operators having any edits or logged actions in two years) had their bot flags removed. They were ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].
*On May 12, ] was ].


<span style="font-size:125%">'''June 2020'''</span>
<font face="terminal">]]]<sup>]</sup></font> is wishing you a ] ]! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! <br />
]
* {{yeac}} ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] · {{nayd}} ] · {{idkc}} ]
*In July 2017, ] made a ] that a section of the ] be devoted to bots and technical issues. In November 2019, ] code was written superseding ]'s tasks on that page, and operator ] was asked to stop them so that the new code could be deployed. After no response to pings, a ] of Legobot for the dashboard was proposed. Some months later, on June 16, Headbomb said: "A full block serves nothing. A partial block solves all current issues Just fucking do it. It's been 3 years now." The next day, however, Legoktm disabled the task, and the dashboard was successfully refactored.
*On June 7, ] blocked ] for ], saying it was "still removing links after request to stop". A couple weeks later, a ] was opened, saying "it is a widely-used and useful bot, but it has one of the longest block logs for any recently-operating bot on Misplaced Pages". While its last BRFA approval was in 2011, its code and functionality had changed dramatically since then, and ] requested that BAG require a new BRFA. Maintainer ] responded that most blocks were from years ago (when it lacked a proper ]), and problems since then had mostly been one-off errors (like a ] in which a ] had "weaponized" the bot to harass editors).
*] opened a discussion about ], and proposed that they not. He cited a recent case in which a maintainer had said "I can only suppose that the code that is available on GitHub is not the actual code that was running on ". Some disagreed: ] said that "I like free software as much as the next person, and I strongly believe that bot operators should make their bot code public, but I don't think it should be that they must do so".
*Two new bots had their first BRFAs approved: ], to replace ] for handling the ], and ], to remove {{tl|user sandbox}} from articles in draftspace using ].


<span style="font-size:150%">'''Conclusion'''</span><br />
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
* What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
</div>
:*Will Citation bot ever be set free to roam the project?
:*What's the deal with all those book links that ] is adding to articles?
:*Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
:*What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?
These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 ''Bots Newsletter''. Tune in, or miss out!


Signing off... <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">''']'''×''']'''</span> 23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
== Request for help with a ] ==
----


<small>(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from ].)</small>
Hello Coren,
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Bots/Spam&oldid=1066996263 -->


== The Dark Nebula ==
You gave me some advice a couple months ago on how to avoid 3RR when dealing with disruptive editors while I was temporarily blocked. I'm on the brink of the 3RR on the ] article and do not want to violate it again, so I'm asking for your assistance because of your previous advice to me and because you're a third party. But it has more to do with just the 3RR. I've been dealing with a ] for the past few weeks who is completely unopen to compromise, revert wars, and now is !vote counting on an RFC he started only a couple days ago, amongst other things -- and I've completely lost my patience with him. I do not believe that the disruptive editor, ] has been exhibiting good faith for some time during this dispute (as well as other disputes on the article, but that's neither here nor there). I've been pointing this out multiple times -- admittedly snidely and with sarcasm but my patience has been thin for a while, and he regards it as personal attacks even though there's plenty of evidence. I probably should've asked for assistance sooner, but better late than never, and I'm now officially convinced that there's no appeasing csloat because he has no intention of being appeased or reaching consensus.


Hi, I tried to place this entry on Misplaced Pages some years ago & was cited as plagiarising an entry on comixpedia. That listing was indeed by me so i was not copying that post but, instead, reposting on Misplaced Pages, unaware that was not appropriate. I am attempting to post this on Misplaced Pages again & would like to know what is required to be removed or altered so that it would indeed be complying with the rules. I'm 62 years of age & not as tech-savvy as i would otherwise like to be.
As I said, this is related to the ] article, particularly the ] subsection. This was a section that I created as part of an enhancement effort after the election, but it was also part of compromise to a major content dispute related to an which was ultimately to the end World Opinion section. Everyone from both sides of the argument over exclusion/inclusion of the material supported the compromise, except csloat. Shortly afterward, he aimed most of his interest at the rest of the World Opinion section, focusing on removing content related to polling data about world disinterest in the election. But this isn't a content dispute (or just a content dispute, rather), this is about disruptive behavior both in editing and discussion.


I should point out that comixpedia is no longer what it was. In fact, if you click on the link for Comixpedia or more specifically the entry regarding The Dark Nebula it is all an Indonesian Gaming/Gambling site, nothing to do with The Dark Nebula or Comics in any way, shape or form.
First and foremost, I believe there is simply no appeasing him. I've made numerous compromises, and he has made absolutely none. This is best illustrated by comparing my and my . Here's a list of the compromises I've made:
#Added information about a statistically insignificant margin for Laos in the 2nd paragraph; a slight modification of one of his edits.
#Changed the lede sentence for the 3rd paragraph since it was not sourced with a more neutrally worded lede sentence; per his request.
#Removed any reference to "apathy" and replaced with "no opinion" in the 3rd paragraph; per his request.
#Provided separate sources from the main source for China, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Latin America because these poll results weren't specifically mentioned in the main source's summary; per his request (which I'll elaborate on shortly).


To be clear the substance of the proposed entry originated from me, including images. I hope a resolution can be reached.
As for Csloat, he hasn't made any compromises. All he's done is remove content and claim that I'm drawing conclusions outside of source material and distorting data. Here's the diff of his first where he pastes over data displaying various countries' disinterest towards the election with a redundant quote (all the information was already in the section's lede paragraph). Here's the diff from his most recent , and here's all that's changed:
#After having it pointed out that his pasted quote was redundant with the first paragraph, he simply removed the first paragraph.
#After pointing out the hypocrisy of him calling poll data about China, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Latin America "cherry picked" but condoning inclusion of data about the European Union, Africa, Canada, Australia, Japan, and South Korea which came from the same source, he simply removed everything and replaced the entire paragraph with his original pasted quote.
#Per a token compromise that I never asked for and don't support, he pasted a sentence about China after the quote.


I leave this in your hands.
CSloat came up with multiple reasons that my contribution was against policy. The accusations would come iteratively as each subsequent accusation was either disproved or addressed, and the accusations got more far-reaching each time -- to the point where his complaint had no valid basis in any Misplaced Pages policy or guideline. Here's how it unfolded:
#Claimed my contribution was ]. I explained to him that this was not original research since everything in the contribution was backed by the source.
#He then changed to claiming that my contribution was ]. I explained to him that this claim has no basis since synthesis requires multiple sources.
#He claimed that drew a conclusion and that my edit was contrary to it. I explained that the source didn't draw a conclusion, it merely summarized poll data; I also pointed out that article specifically said that the majority of the world expressed disinterest, which is the material he was adamant about excluding.
#He started an RFC where he claimed that since the poll summary article is titled "World Citizens Prefer Obama to McCain by More Than 3-to-1" that citing any information that is not about this is against policy (again claiming ]). Now this is just plain ridiculous, and I flat out called it the worst and most transparent excuse that I've ever heard for exclusion of material. But since I realized that simply explaining this to him wouldn't be enough, I '''''appeased''''' his ridiculous claim and went and found articles that supported all of the polling statistics that he wanted excluded. I hoped that this would finally bring a close to this.


Thank you
So now, he's just saying that he simply . His most recent post to the RFC said that there are still "multiple issues" even though he didn't bother to list any, and that I have no more valid points.
] (]) 08:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


== Ten years later ==
But it's more than just his overt resistance to compromise and the various reasons he's come up with for exclusion. During the dispute, when he was on the brink of violating the 3RR rule, he instead placed a totally-disputed tag on my version of the World opinion subsection multiple times; since this was obviously not true and was clearly way too severe a tag, I regarded it as vandalism and removed it each time. During his countless reverts, in the edit summaries he'd often put "per talk", claim his edit was the "consensus" when the dispute was between just us two, claim his edit was "preferred" when again it was just us two, and claim my edits were "disruptive" when his edits were the ones removing content. The last straw was an , with a ''very'' slanted paragraph explaining the issue. After two days and only two other opinions voiced, he counted !votes and declared consensus and -- and this was only sixteen hours after my latest version which addresses all of his stated concerns. It became evident at this point that he was not interested in compromise or consensus, he simply wanted my contribution excluded and intended to count !vote as a basis for the exclusion.


Hi Coren,
The problem is, now one the people who expressed an opinion in the RFC is engaging in the reverting as well. I don't think this person is a sock puppet, but it honestly wouldn't surprise me at all if it turned out to be one.


I resolved when I became an admin that I'd swing by here the first time I had a block overturned, even if you were inactive; and after 6 months and 1,421 blocks that's finally happened, sadly, so here I am. You probably don't remember me, but ten years and two usernames ago (''Francophonie&Androphilie'', kinda cringe name) you indeffed me and then reversed yourself after objections at AN/I. I expected I'd have something to say, when this day did come, about what I've learned from having a block overturned, but really all I can say is that it's unpleasant—both getting it wrong and being told you got it wrong—which is no great insight. But I guess I thought it might please (or at least amuse) you to know I stuck around and am an admin now; and also thought I'd take this as an opportunity to say hi and ask how you've been doing. Maybe you won't see this for a year or won't see it ever, but can't hurt to ask.
If you made it through this entire post, I thank you since I know it's a lot to read. But I wanted to be as clear as possible what my reason is for needing help, because this has gone on for too long and I need help since consensus and compromise have proved impossible.


<span class="nowrap"> <span style="font-family:courier">-- ]</span><sup>]'']</sup> (she&#124;they&#124;xe)</span> 22:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, and I appreciate any help you can offer. --] (]|]) 03:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 15:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 16:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:52, 10 July 2024

This is Coren's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Archives
  Previous years
Older/Undated
2007
   
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2008
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

2009
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2010
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

2011
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2012
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

2013
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2014
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2015
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2016
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

Bots Newsletter, December 2021

Bots Newsletter, December 2021
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the eighth issue of the English Misplaced Pages's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Maintainers disappeared to parts unknown... bots awakening from the slumber of æons... hundreds of thousands of short descriptions... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Misplaced Pages's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

Our last issue was in August 2019, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. Due to the vast quantity of things that have happened, the next few issues will only cover a few months at a time. This month, we'll go from September 2019 through the end of the year. I won't bore you with further introductions — instead, I'll bore you with a newsletter about bots.

Overall

  • Between September and December 2019, there were 33 BRFAs. Of these, Green checkmarkY 25 were approved, and 8 were unsuccessful (Dark red X symbolN2 3 denied, Blue question mark? 3 withdrawn, and Expired 2 expired).

September 2019

Look! It's moving. It's alive. It's alive... It's alive, it's moving, it's alive, it's alive, it's alive, it's alive, IT'S ALIVE!
  • Green checkmarkY Monkbot 16, DannyS712 bot 60, Ahechtbot 6, PearBOT 3, Qbugbot 3 · Dark red X symbolN2 DannyS712 bot 5, PkbwcgsBot 24 · Blue question mark? DannyS712 bot 61, TheSandBot 4
  • TParis goes away, UTRSBot goes kaput: Beeblebrox noted that the bot for maintaining on-wiki records of UTRS appeals stopped working a while ago. TParis, the semi-retired user who had previously run it, said they were "unlikely to return to actively editing Misplaced Pages", and the bot had been vanquished by trolls submitting bogus UTRS requests on behalf of real blocked users. While OAuth was a potential fix, neither maintainer had time to implement it. TParis offered to access to the UTRS WMFLabs account to any admin identified with the WMF: "I miss you guys a whole lot but I've also moved on with my life. Good luck, let me know how I can help". Ultimately, SQL ended up in charge. Some progress was made, and the bot continued to work another couple months — but as of press time, UTRSBot has not edited since November 2019.
  • Article-measuring contest resumed: The list of Wikipedians by article count, which had lain dead for several years, was triumphantly resurrected by GreenC following a bot request.

October 2019

November 2019

Now you're thinking with portals.

December 2019

In the next issue of Bots Newsletter:
What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?

  • What happens when two bots want to clerk the same page?
  • What happens when an adminbot goes hog wild?
  • Will reFill ever get fixed?
  • What's up with ListeriaBot, anyway?
  • Python 3.4 deprecation? In my PyWikiBot? (It's more likely than you think!)

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the January 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Bots Newsletter, January 2022

Bots Newsletter, January 2022
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Misplaced Pages's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Misplaced Pages's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.

Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost two years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.

Overall
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 BRFAs. Of these, Green checkmarkY 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with Dark red X symbolN2 8 denied, Blue question mark? 2 withdrawn, and Expired 2 expired).

January 2020

A pythonA pythonA python0.4 pythonsYeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.

February 2020

Speaking of WikiProject Molecular Biology, Listeria went wild in February

March 2020

April 2020

Listeria being examined

Issues and enquiries are typically expected to be handled on the English Misplaced Pages. Pages reachable via unified login, like a talk page at Commons or at Italian Misplaced Pages could also be acceptable External sites like Phabricator or GitHub (which require separate registration or do not allow for IP comments) and email (which can compromise anonymity) can supplement on-wiki communication, but do not replace it.

May 2020

We heard you like bots, so we made a bot that reports the status of your bots, so now you can use bots while you use bots

June 2020

A partial block averted at the eleventh hour for the robot that makes Legos

Conclusion

  • What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
  • Will Citation bot ever be set free to roam the project?
  • What's the deal with all those book links that InternetArchiveBot is adding to articles?
  • Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
  • What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

The Dark Nebula

Hi, I tried to place this entry on Misplaced Pages some years ago & was cited as plagiarising an entry on comixpedia. That listing was indeed by me so i was not copying that post but, instead, reposting on Misplaced Pages, unaware that was not appropriate. I am attempting to post this on Misplaced Pages again & would like to know what is required to be removed or altered so that it would indeed be complying with the rules. I'm 62 years of age & not as tech-savvy as i would otherwise like to be.

I should point out that comixpedia is no longer what it was. In fact, if you click on the link for Comixpedia or more specifically the entry regarding The Dark Nebula it is all an Indonesian Gaming/Gambling site, nothing to do with The Dark Nebula or Comics in any way, shape or form.

To be clear the substance of the proposed entry originated from me, including images. I hope a resolution can be reached.

I leave this in your hands.

Thank you The Dark Nebula (talk) 08:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Ten years later

Hi Coren,

I resolved when I became an admin that I'd swing by here the first time I had a block overturned, even if you were inactive; and after 6 months and 1,421 blocks that's finally happened, sadly, so here I am. You probably don't remember me, but ten years and two usernames ago (Francophonie&Androphilie, kinda cringe name) you indeffed me and then reversed yourself after objections at AN/I. I expected I'd have something to say, when this day did come, about what I've learned from having a block overturned, but really all I can say is that it's unpleasant—both getting it wrong and being told you got it wrong—which is no great insight. But I guess I thought it might please (or at least amuse) you to know I stuck around and am an admin now; and also thought I'd take this as an opportunity to say hi and ask how you've been doing. Maybe you won't see this for a year or won't see it ever, but can't hurt to ask.

-- Tamzin (she|they|xe) 22:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WMFLabsIP

Template:WMFLabsIP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Csb-day

Template:Csb-day has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)