| Revision as of 19:29, 18 October 2005 editMCB (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,602 edits Revert POV material; has no place in encyclopedia article← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:31, 9 September 2008 edit undoRedirect fixer (talk | contribs)69,018 edits Franklin child sex ring allegations has been moved; it now redirects to Franklin child prostitution ring allegations. | ||
| (35 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| '''Paul A. Bonacci''' won a judgment of $800,000 compensatory damages and $200,000 in punitive damages in a civil action against ] which featured allegations including ], ], ], and ], and alleged various personal injuries, both physical and psychological. | |||
| The judgment in ] in ], on ], ] was a ], following defendant King's failure to appear to answer the charges. At the time, King was imprisoned due to an unrelated matter, and was believed to be unable to pay for legal representation. As required by U.S. law and the ], the plaintiff's allegations were required to be taken as fact based on the testimony, since no contrary evidence was introduced. On that basis, the judge awarded monetary damages. The case was not appealed. | |||
| The Bonacci case was the subject of public interest due to allegations of abuse involving prominent ] members with ties to the ] and ] administrations, as well as alleged connections to the ] project ] and other mind-control experiments. | |||
| The case, along with other allegations regarding Lawrence King, is the subject of an never-aired ], '']'', made by a British television company. Various criminal cases in state and federal courts in the King/Bonacci case, and similar allegations made by others, did not result in convictions. | |||
| Bonacci's attorney, and other parties including activists who assert the existence of widespread satanic ritual abuse cults and child sex rings, claim that there was a ] in the King/Bonacci case and similar cases. The existence of such cults and groups, and their participation in activities that were the subject of the Bonacci case, remains a controversial topic. | |||
Latest revision as of 17:31, 9 September 2008
Redirect to: