Revision as of 17:02, 22 December 2008 editRenamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc (talk | contribs)37,368 edits →Threshold (online game): reply, and thanks← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:20, 6 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- |
<!-- From NE ENT's page... great idea ! --> | ||
{{Banned user|time=indefinitely|by=the community|link=See the ]}} | |||
</noinclude>{| align="center" style="width: {{{width|65%}}}; margin-top: 0.5em; padding-top: 1em; padding-left: 1em; padding-right: 1em; background-color: #FFFFFF; transparent; border: solid medium #ADD8E6; -moz-border-radius: 15px; -webkit-border-radius: 15px;" | |||
| <span style="font-size: 90%;"><span style="color:#000000;">'''Enshrined so I won't forget it ...'''</span></span> | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
Hey Kosh. There are so many issue with that statement that I felt it important to drop by. | |||
*{{xt|policy '''should ''' be enforced '''as written'''}} - from a high level ] is a guideline and ] is policy. The principle is what matters, not exact wording of the rules. Disputes are solved by discussion, not strict adherence to the rules. Does that make sense? The "rules" are just a description of what's happened before and likely will happen again... generally the right thing to do, but not be followed blindly. No matter whether you're right or wrong on the underlying issue, not understanding this fundamental principle is the reason you are blocked. | |||
*So, on to the underlying issue. Is the content on page in violation of POLEMIC? Honestly, I'd say no. POLEMIC '''in bold''' refers to '''Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing'''. Is what he's saying offensive? Barely. Very divisive? Not really. ''AND'' it's related to encyclopedic editing. It just doesn't fit in that section. It's not targeted at individuals or a specific group, let alone attacking or vilifying them. It's not a pre-meditated nasty attack, it's a person ranting on their way out the door. I don't agree with a word of it, but it's important to let people express themselves in situations like that. | |||
This way of thinking is fundamental to Misplaced Pages, it's why IAR exists. ]<sup>TT</sup>(]) 11:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{{archivebox|auto=yes}} | |||
<!-- </includeonly> --> | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
<!-- In place since 1/28/2013 --> | |||
|algo = old(3d) | |||
|archive = User talk:KoshVorlon/Archive %(counter)d | |||
|counter = 1 | |||
{{NOINDEX|visible=no}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 250K | |||
{{User:SuggestBot/config | |||
|frequency = once a month | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:KoshVorlon/header}} | |||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
{| width="95%" align="center" cellspacing="3" style="background-color:#D9F4FF;margin-b: 3px;" | |||
|align=right| | |||
{{User wikipedia/WikiGnome}}'''GFL - GNOME FOR LIFE ''' | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 10K | |||
|counter = 88 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
|algo = old(31d) | |||
|archive = User talk:KoshVorlon/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{clear}} | |||
{{Archivebox|1=<div style="text-align:center;"><div class="hlist"> | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
</div><inputbox> | |||
bgcolor= | |||
type=fulltext | |||
prefix=User_talk:KoshVorlon | |||
break=yes | |||
width=20% | |||
searchbuttonlabel=Search | |||
</inputbox></div>}} | |||
{| width="95%" align="center" cellspacing="3" style="border: 4px solid blue; background-color: #D9F4FF; margin-b: 3px;" | {| width="95%" align="center" cellspacing="3" style="border: 4px solid blue; background-color: #D9F4FF; margin-b: 3px;" | ||
|align=left| | |align=left| | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<!-- The New Message link has been borrowed from Treasury_Tag --> | |||
== Archive List === <br /><br /> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{| class="messagebox current" style="width: auto;" | {| class="messagebox current" style="width: auto;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 28: | Line 103: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== |
== Reply from the Cap'n == | ||
{{Talkback|Captain Screebo}} | |||
== Talkback == | |||
{{Talkback|Skamecrazy123}} | |||
== From your user page == | |||
I removed most of the quotes because it was started to read like an interview. Yes it feels more dry, but that's what an encyclopedia is. Check out ]. Quotes should be used sparatically. You did a good job of starting the article, but it looked like you were essentially took your sources and pulled things direct. It's much better to summarize the quotes. Also, the overall tone of the article felt (and still does to a lesser extent) like it was praise. The tone should feel less biased. | |||
] (]) 20:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Considering that my edit spoke of the fact that Tullian has publicly debated other with regards to his views, and the links I referenced go DIRECTLY to those debates, there should not be an issue. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:51, 13 May 2013</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
== Don't remove other's comments at ACE2008 == | |||
== Support request with team editing experiment project == | |||
ST47's comments were neither uncivil or BITE-y. He was simply clerking, and properly indented an ineligible editor's vote. Remnoval of such comments could be considered vandalism. <small><sup>''S.''</sup></small><small><sub>''D.''</sub></small>'''D.J.'''] 21:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Misplaced Pages about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: ), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Misplaced Pages community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Misplaced Pages everywhere) Regards from on meta. | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Micru@metawiki using the list at http://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=12060169 --> | |||
== let me spit in the face of that filthy bastard.. he deserves it! == | |||
== Kyle Justin == | |||
read the title. | |||
My apologies on the ] revert, friend. Please don't take offense. Obviously, I'm new to this. If I would have ''fully'' read the Wiki policy's article I would have understood what it meant. When I saw "links to avoid" I thought it didn't ''necessary'' mean these links should not be used, yet they should be used with caution (hence, avoid), because they could violate copyright or some other rights. I understand why ] links are links to be avoided (not used). I disagree with this, however, so I will try to bring it up on that policy's talk page. My question for you is, for a group whose website ''is'' their ] page (this is not uncommon, I know of many bands who do this) what do ''they'' do? If their ] page is an offical band site and it is ''their'' copyright, there is no foul in my eyes. What do you think? I say this because, in regards to the ] link you removed, that is the only official Dirty Barby website--they have no other offical sites. | |||
== Talkback == | |||
In the spirit of editing ] out of Misplaced Pages altogether... here are some other pages I found with links to ] accounts on them, have at it! :) | |||
{{Talkback|Jersey92}} | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
], | |||
] | |||
==Splits== | |||
There is much more where that came from. Perhaps we should start an anti-] Misplaced Pages campaign. Talk soon my friend. :) M. W. Eilers 03:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Master KoshVarlon, I didn't think that my splittings would become such a big deal. I made such splits on ], ], ], just to name a few, and didn't imagine that I would be bullied and shouted around, because there aren't that many users who patrol the talk pages, so I decided to be bold and split them. The user who has reported me is not a bad person, but I think this is just diminiutive and disparaging, concerning my lengthy experience, working here on Misplaced Pages, and also it is delay for the work on these articles. I beg you not to block me, because in fact, I intend to continue such work and splits of lengthy bibliographies and in fact to be more uncompromising with the user who reported me, because I kind of look at the whole matter more as a "cavil retail" than a serious Misplaced Pages matter. | |||
:Kindest regards:] (]) | |||
== |
== Sorry about that == | ||
'''Sorry About The Edit on ]''' | |||
Sorry- you're right, I missed the footnote in the middle because of the speculation at the end which I'm glad you removed. I know the reports came in, but think we should proceed with caution about reporting minute-by-minute breaking news. Plenty of time to add material when it's really verified. But I was wrong when I said it was unsourced. Thanks for catching that. I'll leave it in, as I don't feel that strongly about it, but let's please keep speculation out.<strong>]</strong>/<small>]</small> 21:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
I'm sorry, my friend trolled me by editing that page. I promise it won't happen again... | |||
== |
== inapropriate sentence == | ||
the sentence used there is the penis is inserted to the wagena. so it seems so, inapropriate for some users | |||
Hello, I'm writing because you were at one time a significant contributor to ]. Some issues have come up regarding the article's contents, and I'm at an impasse with a possibly-] affected editor. I would greatly appreciate your participation at ]. —/]/<sup><small>]</small></sup>/<sub><small>]</small></sub>/ 02:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Alright, then- thanks for disclosing that; the editor in question made at least 4 replies in which he only demanded my backing off because I had previously played the game. TBH, considering the info you'd introduced to that page, I had wondered what your connection was. Incidentally that very website might end up being a good source for corroborating some of the info in the article; it's still mirrored by the ]. At any rate, thanks for your reply! —/]/<sup><small>]</small></sup>/<sub><small>]</small></sub>/ 17:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:20, 6 March 2023
This user has been banned indefinitely from editing the English Misplaced Pages by the community. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking. (block log · contributions · See the discussion at ANI) |
Enshrined so I won't forget it ...
This way of thinking is fundamental to Misplaced Pages, it's why IAR exists. Worm(talk) 11:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC) |
- VorlonHomeWorld
- BabCom (Talk )
- The Book of Vorlon
- JumpGate
- My Userboxen
- Atlas of the Planets
- My Barnstars
- Awards I've recieved
- The Grey Council (Chat )
|