Revision as of 03:14, 29 January 2009 editHeelop (talk | contribs)555 edits Fyslee, on your user page you said: "Suppression of opposing POV is a very unwikipedian thing to do." Sorry but "special pleading" is not a wiki rule.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:27, 1 July 2024 edit undoKuru (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators204,651 edits not the same; garbage source as wellTag: Manual revert | ||
(253 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Pseudoscientific term in alternative medicine}} | |||
⚫ | '''Mucoid plaque''' or |
||
{{Infobox pseudoscience | |||
|image = | |||
|image_width = | |||
|caption = | |||
|claims = Claimed to be a harmful material coating the gastrointestinal tract. | |||
|topics = ] | |||
|origyear = Early 20th century | |||
|origprop = Richard Anderson | |||
|currentprop = | |||
}} | |||
⚫ | '''Mucoid plaque''' (or mucoid cap or rope) is a ] term used by some ] advocates to describe what is claimed to be a combination of harmful ] material and food residue that they say coats the ] of most people. The term was coined by Richard Anderson, a ] and ], who sells a range of products that claim to "cleanse" the body of such purported plaques.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight>{{cite news |url=https://www.straight.com/article/colon-cleanses-thrive-despite-scant-proof |title=Colon cleanses thrive despite scant proof | newspaper = ] | access-date=2008-11-05}}</ref> | ||
Many such "]" products are promoted to the public on websites that have been described as making misleading medical claims.<ref name=Hochster/> The presence of laxatives, ], and fibrous thickening agents in some of these "cleansing agents" has led to suggestions that the products themselves produce the excreted matter regarded as the plaque.<ref name=Hochster/><ref name=Schwarcz/> | |||
Mucus is a naturally occurring product of the digestive system and plays an important role in protecting the surface of the gut from damage and infection.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Allen A, Flemström G |title=Gastroduodenal mucus bicarbonate barrier: protection against acid and pepsin |journal=Am. J. Physiol., Cell Physiol. |volume=288 |issue=1 |pages=C1–19 |year=2005 |month=January |pmid=15591243 |doi=10.1152/ajpcell.00102.2004}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Schenk M, Mueller C |title=The mucosal immune system at the gastrointestinal barrier |journal=Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=391–409 |year=2008 |pmid=18492562 |doi=10.1016/j.bpg.2007.11.002}}</ref> This mucus layer is less than a millimetre thick, but may become thinner or be removed entirely in diseases such as ], which exposes the surface of the intestine to damage.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Pullan RD, Thomas GA, Rhodes M, ''et al'' |title=Thickness of adherent mucus gel on colonic mucosa in humans and its relevance to colitis |journal=Gut |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=353–9 |year=1994 |month=March |pmid=8150346 |pmc=1374589 |doi= |url=http://gut.bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=8150346}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Strugala V, Dettmar PW, Pearson JP |title=Thickness and continuity of the adherent colonic mucus barrier in active and quiescent ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease |journal=Int. J. Clin. Pract. |volume=62 |issue=5 |pages=762–9 |year=2008 |month=May |pmid=18194279 |doi=10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01665.x}}</ref> However, the concept that this mucus layer might form a 'mucoid plaque' has been dismissed by ]s as having no anatomical or physiological basis.<ref name="bjmu">{{Cite web |last=Soergel |first=Dagobert |coauthors=Tony Tse, Laura Slaughter |url=http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf | title=Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information | work=MedInfo2004 | publisher=IOS Press, Amsterdam |date=2004 accessdate=2007-02-21}}</ref><ref name="uthman">{{cite web | publisher = ] | url = http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/QA/mucoidplaque.html | title = Mucoid Plaque | first = Edward | last = Uthman | accessdate = 2007-02-21}}</ref><ref name="friedlander">{{cite web| url = http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#colonic |title = Ed’s Guide to Alternative Therapies: Colonics | first = Ed | last = Friedlander | accessdate = 2007-02-21}}</ref> | |||
The concept of a 'mucoid plaque' has been dismissed by medical experts as having no anatomical or physiological basis.<ref name="bjmu">{{Cite journal|last=Soergel |first=Dagobert |author2=Tony Tse |author3=Laura Slaughter |url=http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf |title=Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information |journal=MedInfo2004 |publisher=IOS Press, Amsterdam |year=2004 |volume=107 |issue=Pt 2 |pages=931–5 |pmid=15360949 |access-date=2012-08-31 |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717205922/http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf |archive-date=July 17, 2011 }}</ref><ref name="uthman">{{cite web | publisher = ] | url = http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/QA/mucoidplaque.html | title = Mucoid Plaque | first = Edward | last = Uthman | date = 7 January 1998 | access-date = 2007-02-21}}</ref><ref name="friedlander">{{cite web| url = http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#colonic |title = Ed's Guide to Alternative Therapies: Colonics | first = Ed | last = Friedlander | access-date = 2007-02-21}}</ref> | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
Various forms of colon cleansing were popular in the 19th and early 20th century.<ref |
Various forms of colon cleansing were popular in the 19th and early 20th century.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Sullivan-Fowler M |title=Doubtful theories, drastic therapies: autointoxication and faddism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries |journal=J Hist Med Allied Sci |volume=50 |issue=3 |pages=364–90 |date=July 1995 |pmid=7665877 |doi=10.1093/jhmas/50.3.364}}</ref> In 1932, Bastedo wrote in the ] about his observation of mucus masses being removed during a colon irrigation procedure: "When one sees the dirty gray, brown or blackish sheets, strings and rolled up wormlike masses of tough mucus with a rotten or dead-fish odor that are obtained by colon irrigations, one does not wonder that these patients feel ill and that they obtain relief and show improvement as the result of the irrigation."<ref>{{cite journal | last = Bastedo WA | title = Colonic irrigations: their administration, therapeutic application and dangers | publisher = JAMA | year = 1932 | volume = 98 | pages = 736}}</ref> | ||
While colonic irrigation enjoyed a vogue in early 20th century as a possible cure for numerous diseases, subsequent research showed that it was useless and potentially harmful. With the scientific rationale for "colon cleansing" disproven, the idea fell into disrepute as a form of ], with a |
While colonic irrigation enjoyed a vogue in the early 20th century as a possible cure for numerous diseases, subsequent research showed that it was useless and potentially harmful.<ref name=Ernst>{{cite journal|last1=Ernst|first1=E|author-link=Edzard Ernst|title=Colonic irrigation and the theory of autointoxication: a triumph of ignorance over science.|journal=]|date=June 1997|volume=24|issue=4|pages=196–198|pmid=9252839|doi=10.1097/00004836-199706000-00002|doi-access=free}}</ref> With the scientific rationale for "colon cleansing" disproven, the idea fell into disrepute as a form of ], with a 2005 medical review stating that "there is no evidence to support this ill-conceived theory that has been long abandoned by the scientific community."<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A |title=Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation |journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=232–42 |date=January 2005 |doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40885.x |pmid=15654804 |s2cid=8060335 }}</ref> Similarly, in response to claims that colon cleansing removes "toxins", Bennett Roth, a gastroenterologist at the ], stated that "there is absolutely no science to this whatsoever. There is no such thing as getting rid of quote-unquote 'toxins.' The colon was made to carry stool. This is total baloney."<ref name=Foreman/> The preoccupation with such bowel management products has been described as a "quaint and amusing chapter in the history of weird medical beliefs."<ref>{{cite news | first = Denise | last = Grady | url = https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A05E2DA1E3AF930A15756C0A9669C8B63&sec=health&spon=&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink | title = Cult of the Colon: From Little Liver Pills to Big Obsessions | work = ] | date= May 23, 2000}}</ref> Nevertheless, interest in colonic "]" as a cause of illness, and in colonic irrigation as a cure, enjoyed a revival in ] at the end of the 20th century.<ref name=Ernst/> | ||
The term "mucoid plaque" was coined and popularized by ] Richard Anderson.<ref name=Schwarcz>Joe Schwarcz |
The term "mucoid plaque" was coined and popularized by ] and ] Richard Anderson, who sells a range of products that claim to cleanse the body of such purported plaques by causing them to be eliminated.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight/> Anderson describes a mucoid plaque as a rubbery, ropey, generally green ]-like mucus film that covers the ]s of the ], particularly of the ]. Anderson also claims the plaque can impair digestion and the absorption of nutrients, hold ]s, and cause illnesses such as ], ], ] and skin conditions. Based on these claims, he promotes efforts to remove the plaque, and sells a range of products to this end.<ref name=Schwarcz>{{cite news|author1=Joe Schwarcz|author-link1=Joseph A. Schwarcz|title=I have a gut feeling something's wrong here|url=http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=437cc94f-2b5f-4327-abf8-762f63e6067a|work=Montreal Gazette|date=April 5, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120603145225/http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=437cc94f-2b5f-4327-abf8-762f63e6067a&p=1|archive-date=June 3, 2012}}</ref><ref name="AndersonBooks">{{cite book| last = Anderson | first = Richard |title = Cleanse & Purify Thyself, Books One and Two | publisher = Christobe Publishing |year = 2000}}</ref> | ||
Though Anderson argues that his beliefs are backed by scientific research, his claims are primarily supported by ] rather than ], and doctors have noted the absence of mucoid plaques. Anderson claims this is due to medical textbooks failing to cover the concept, which results in doctors not knowing what to look for.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight/> | |||
==Statements by Anderson== | |||
The mucoid plaque is described by Anderson as a "gel-like, viscous and slimy ] that forms as a layer or layers covering ]s in various hollow organs, especially all the organs of the ]."<ref name="AndersonBooks"/> It is generally described as rubbery, ropey and often green. | |||
⚫ | ==Medical evaluation== | ||
Anderson further claims that the plaque is a health threat. He contends it can impair ] and nutrient absorption, cause sugar intolerance, provide a haven for ]s and ]s and cause ]. In addition the condition is alleged to promote the development of ], ] and skin conditions. Anderson advocates the removal of mucoid plaque as a health benefit, and promotes a range of products he has developed that are said to accomplish this task.<ref name="AndersonBooks"/> | |||
Practicing ]s have dismissed the concept of mucoid plaque as a ] and a "non-credible concept".<ref name="bjmu"/> A pathologist at the ] School of Medicine addressed Anderson's claims directly, saying that he has "seen several thousand intestinal biopsies and have never seen any 'mucoid plaque.' This is a complete fabrication with no anatomic basis."<ref name="GeorgiaStraight" /><ref name="uthman"/> | |||
⚫ | Another pathologist, Edward Friedlander, noted that, in his experience, he has never observed anything resembling a "toxic bowel settlement", and that some online photographs actually depict what he recognises as a ].<ref name="friedlander"/> Commenting on claims that waste material can adhere to the colon, Douglas Pleskow, a gastroenterologist at ], stated, "that is the urban legend. In reality, most people clear their GI tract within three days."<ref name=Foreman>{{cite news | first = Judy | last = Foreman | url = http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-he-toxic30-2008jun30,0,4875078.column | title = Beware of colon cleansing claims | work = ] | date = June 30, 2008}}</ref> | ||
Anderson insists his claims are backed up by papers and textbooks on digestive physiology. He provides as evidence a ] study that reports the presence of thick mucous layers in the small intestines of children with chronic diarrhea and food intolerances.<ref name="AndersonBooks"/> One of Anderson's chief replies to his critics is that the reason there have not been confirmed reports of mucoid plaque by the medical profession is because current medical textbooks do not cover the concept and therefore doctors do not know what to look for.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight/> | |||
⚫ | In a review of websites promoting products that claim to remove 'mucoid rope' or plaque from consumers' intestines, Howard Hochster of ] wrote that these websites are "abundant, quasi-scientific, and unfortunately convincing to a biologically uneducated public." He noted that although such sites are entertaining, they are disturbing in that they promote a belief that has no basis in physiology.<ref name=Hochster>{{cite journal |author=Hochster H. |title="Colon Health" Websites |journal=Current Colorectal Cancer Reports |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=105–106 |year=2007 |doi=10.1007/s11888-006-0027-6 |s2cid=195301831 }}</ref> | ||
Anderson claims that doctors are mistaken when they say that the mucus layer is needed for lubrication and protection of the mucosal surface. He says that the ] layer, which is underneath the mucus layer and contains alkaline buffering agents, actually peforms these important functions. He says that most doctors don’t know the difference between the mucus layer and the glycocalyx layer even though biopsies studied with the electron microscope demonstrate this important difference. <ref name="AndersonBooks"/> | |||
⚫ | Hochster also noted that a preparation marketed to remove mucoid plaque contains laxatives and bulky fibrous ingredients. Thus, the rope-like fecal material expelled from people who consume this product "certainly is a result of the figs and senna in this preparation," rather than any sort of pathologic 'plaque'.<ref name=Hochster/> Other 'colon cleanser' products contain bentonite clay that, when ingested, would also result in production of bulky stools.<ref name=Schwarcz/> | ||
In response to concerns that his cleanse products might actually create mucoid plaque rather than remove it, he claims, in his defense, that mucoid plaque stools have been described in conventional ] long before his cleanse products have been used. <ref name =FAQ>{{cite web |url = http://www.cleanse.net/index.asp?PageAction=Custom&ID=35#mucoid |title = FAQ's |author = Richard Anderson |work=cleanse.net |accessdate = 2008-11-08 |year = 2007}}</ref> | |||
Anderson also alleges that a number of conditions recognised as distinct disorders or physiological entities by the medical community are actually varying manifestations of mucoid plaque – such as ], gastric ], ], ], intestinal ], ], ], ] and ]. However, other marketers of colon cleansing products have ackowledged that mucoid plaque holds no standing amongst the medical profession and is backed up primarily by ] rather than ].<ref name="colonsource/skeptics">{{cite web |url=http://www.colonsource.com/skeptics.html |title=Some Skeptical Perspectives on Colon Cleansing |accessdate=2008-11-05}}</ref> | |||
In many cases, customers purchase supplement products that are said to help the body excrete the so-called 'mucoid plaque'. The customer may consume a number of pills, and then within 12–48 hours, will pass a rope-like fecal material in their subsequent bowel movements. This fecal material is said to be the 'mucoid plaque'. However, analysis of supplements consumed by the customer shows that the active ingredient is very similar to that of clay used in clumping cat litter. This clay takes a negative mould of the large intestine which is then excreted during the customer's next bowel movement. <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4083|title = The Detoxification Myth}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | ==Medical evaluation== | ||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | ==References== | ||
⚫ | In a review of websites promoting products that claim to remove 'mucoid rope' or plaque from consumers' intestines, Howard Hochster of ] wrote that these websites are "abundant, quasi-scientific, and unfortunately convincing to a biologically uneducated public." He noted that although such sites are entertaining, they are disturbing in that they promote a belief that has no basis in physiology.<ref name=Hochster>{{cite journal |author=Hochster H. |title= |
||
⚫ | {{reflist|2}} | ||
{{Naturopathy}} | |||
==Causes== | |||
⚫ | {{Pseudoscience}} | ||
Anderson says that mucoid plaque is generated by the human body in response to harmful toxins. Dietary sources of these toxins listed by Anderson include processed food, alcohol and salt. He further states that drugs exacerbate the condition, as do intestinal parasites, and that imbalance of internal microbiota caused by antibiotics promotes plaque formation. | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Mucoid Plaque}} | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | ==References== | ||
⚫ | {{reflist|2}} | ||
⚫ | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 22:27, 1 July 2024
Pseudoscientific term in alternative medicineClaims | Claimed to be a harmful material coating the gastrointestinal tract. |
---|---|
Related scientific disciplines | Medicine |
Year proposed | Early 20th century |
Original proponents | Richard Anderson |
(Overview of pseudoscientific concepts) |
Mucoid plaque (or mucoid cap or rope) is a pseudoscientific term used by some alternative medicine advocates to describe what is claimed to be a combination of harmful mucus-like material and food residue that they say coats the gastrointestinal tract of most people. The term was coined by Richard Anderson, a naturopath and entrepreneur, who sells a range of products that claim to "cleanse" the body of such purported plaques.
Many such "colon cleansing" products are promoted to the public on websites that have been described as making misleading medical claims. The presence of laxatives, bentonite clay, and fibrous thickening agents in some of these "cleansing agents" has led to suggestions that the products themselves produce the excreted matter regarded as the plaque. The concept of a 'mucoid plaque' has been dismissed by medical experts as having no anatomical or physiological basis.
History
Various forms of colon cleansing were popular in the 19th and early 20th century. In 1932, Bastedo wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association about his observation of mucus masses being removed during a colon irrigation procedure: "When one sees the dirty gray, brown or blackish sheets, strings and rolled up wormlike masses of tough mucus with a rotten or dead-fish odor that are obtained by colon irrigations, one does not wonder that these patients feel ill and that they obtain relief and show improvement as the result of the irrigation."
While colonic irrigation enjoyed a vogue in the early 20th century as a possible cure for numerous diseases, subsequent research showed that it was useless and potentially harmful. With the scientific rationale for "colon cleansing" disproven, the idea fell into disrepute as a form of quackery, with a 2005 medical review stating that "there is no evidence to support this ill-conceived theory that has been long abandoned by the scientific community." Similarly, in response to claims that colon cleansing removes "toxins", Bennett Roth, a gastroenterologist at the University of California, stated that "there is absolutely no science to this whatsoever. There is no such thing as getting rid of quote-unquote 'toxins.' The colon was made to carry stool. This is total baloney." The preoccupation with such bowel management products has been described as a "quaint and amusing chapter in the history of weird medical beliefs." Nevertheless, interest in colonic "autointoxication" as a cause of illness, and in colonic irrigation as a cure, enjoyed a revival in alternative medicine at the end of the 20th century.
The term "mucoid plaque" was coined and popularized by naturopath and entrepreneur Richard Anderson, who sells a range of products that claim to cleanse the body of such purported plaques by causing them to be eliminated. Anderson describes a mucoid plaque as a rubbery, ropey, generally green gel-like mucus film that covers the epithelial cells of the hollow organs, particularly of the alimentary canal. Anderson also claims the plaque can impair digestion and the absorption of nutrients, hold pathogens, and cause illnesses such as diarrhea, bowel cancer, allergies and skin conditions. Based on these claims, he promotes efforts to remove the plaque, and sells a range of products to this end.
Though Anderson argues that his beliefs are backed by scientific research, his claims are primarily supported by anecdotal evidence rather than empirical data, and doctors have noted the absence of mucoid plaques. Anderson claims this is due to medical textbooks failing to cover the concept, which results in doctors not knowing what to look for.
Medical evaluation
Practicing physicians have dismissed the concept of mucoid plaque as a hoax and a "non-credible concept". A pathologist at the University of Texas School of Medicine addressed Anderson's claims directly, saying that he has "seen several thousand intestinal biopsies and have never seen any 'mucoid plaque.' This is a complete fabrication with no anatomic basis."
Another pathologist, Edward Friedlander, noted that, in his experience, he has never observed anything resembling a "toxic bowel settlement", and that some online photographs actually depict what he recognises as a blood clot. Commenting on claims that waste material can adhere to the colon, Douglas Pleskow, a gastroenterologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, stated, "that is the urban legend. In reality, most people clear their GI tract within three days."
In a review of websites promoting products that claim to remove 'mucoid rope' or plaque from consumers' intestines, Howard Hochster of New York University wrote that these websites are "abundant, quasi-scientific, and unfortunately convincing to a biologically uneducated public." He noted that although such sites are entertaining, they are disturbing in that they promote a belief that has no basis in physiology.
Hochster also noted that a preparation marketed to remove mucoid plaque contains laxatives and bulky fibrous ingredients. Thus, the rope-like fecal material expelled from people who consume this product "certainly is a result of the figs and senna in this preparation," rather than any sort of pathologic 'plaque'. Other 'colon cleanser' products contain bentonite clay that, when ingested, would also result in production of bulky stools.
In many cases, customers purchase supplement products that are said to help the body excrete the so-called 'mucoid plaque'. The customer may consume a number of pills, and then within 12–48 hours, will pass a rope-like fecal material in their subsequent bowel movements. This fecal material is said to be the 'mucoid plaque'. However, analysis of supplements consumed by the customer shows that the active ingredient is very similar to that of clay used in clumping cat litter. This clay takes a negative mould of the large intestine which is then excreted during the customer's next bowel movement.
References
- ^ "Colon cleanses thrive despite scant proof". The Georgia Straight. Retrieved 2008-11-05.
- ^ Hochster H. (2007). ""Colon Health" Websites". Current Colorectal Cancer Reports. 2 (3): 105–106. doi:10.1007/s11888-006-0027-6. S2CID 195301831.
- ^ Joe Schwarcz (April 5, 2008). "I have a gut feeling something's wrong here". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on June 3, 2012.
- ^ Soergel, Dagobert; Tony Tse; Laura Slaughter (2004). "Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information" (PDF). MedInfo2004. 107 (Pt 2). IOS Press, Amsterdam: 931–5. PMID 15360949. Archived from the original on July 17, 2011. Retrieved 2012-08-31.
- ^ Uthman, Edward (7 January 1998). "Mucoid Plaque". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
- ^ Friedlander, Ed. "Ed's Guide to Alternative Therapies: Colonics". Retrieved 2007-02-21.
- Sullivan-Fowler M (July 1995). "Doubtful theories, drastic therapies: autointoxication and faddism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries". J Hist Med Allied Sci. 50 (3): 364–90. doi:10.1093/jhmas/50.3.364. PMID 7665877.
- Bastedo WA (1932). "Colonic irrigations: their administration, therapeutic application and dangers". 98. JAMA: 736.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ Ernst, E (June 1997). "Colonic irrigation and the theory of autointoxication: a triumph of ignorance over science". Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 24 (4): 196–198. doi:10.1097/00004836-199706000-00002. PMID 9252839.
- Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A (January 2005). "Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation". Am. J. Gastroenterol. 100 (1): 232–42. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40885.x. PMID 15654804. S2CID 8060335.
- ^ Foreman, Judy (June 30, 2008). "Beware of colon cleansing claims". Los Angeles Times.
- Grady, Denise (May 23, 2000). "Cult of the Colon: From Little Liver Pills to Big Obsessions". New York Times.
- Anderson, Richard (2000). Cleanse & Purify Thyself, Books One and Two. Christobe Publishing.
- "The Detoxification Myth".