Misplaced Pages

Academic elitism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:58, 3 November 2005 editThor Andersen (talk | contribs)150 edits took away link to ivory tower disambig page, pointless.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:39, 26 May 2021 edit undoDeryck Chan (talk | contribs)Administrators22,733 edits rcat, also remove anchor to deleted sectionTags: Redirect target changed 2017 wikitext editor 
(391 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
] institutions often face the charge of '''Academic elitism''', sometimes called the Ivory Tower.
{{rcat shell|
== What is this? ==
{{R from subtopic}}

{{R with possibilities}}
'''Academic elitism''' suggests that in highly competitive academic environments only those individuals who have engaged in ] are deemed to have anything worthwhile to say, or do. A lesser and broader form of this, ], exists in non-academic circles, however academic elitism might also be viewed as a further extreme of intellectual elitism, depending upon one's perspective.
}}

The tendency towards academic elitism is most pronounced in highly competitive and highly regarded institutions.

This form of elitism is noticeable in the streaming ]s that exist in most developed countries. More attention and resources are afforded to students who are deemed most intelligent at an early age. This inequality tends to further separate the elite from the remainder of society. ] systems include branded institutions, gifted classes, and other elite student groups. Countries with extensive private school systems also exemplify this trend.

Some arguments against the acceptance of Academic Elitism are: That it is an inherently exclusionary process; That it serves to hamper the advancement of human knowledge by ignoring potentially valid ideas; That it encourages waste through the development of a winner-takes-all mentality; That academic institutions are unreasonably shielded from economic competition by government funding programs; That selection processes are unfairly biased towards certain groups; And that it alienates those who are not of the elite and discourages them from participating in decision-making.

Some arguments against the refusal of Academic Elitism are: That ] is an illusion which masks an inherent human tendency to group by abilities and interests; That human societies are best advanced by those who are most willing and able to participate in academic study; And that human societies require a vetting process that leads people to roles that will yield the most efficient management of societal resources.

== Examples of this ==

Authors including - but not limited to - ''']''', ''']''' (Social Democrat), and ''']''' (Ardent ]/]) have explored both sides of Social Elitism through ]/]. One is often Intelligent before Academic, but sometimes the order is reversed. They present theoretical examples of the ] societies which might result from either extreme support or extreme undermining of elitism.

For example, George Orwell has written several books on the subject, such as ] and ], where there are characters who take the role of a 'Vanguard', acting FOR - or on the behalf OF - their society, who turn to them for everything, or rely on them. It usually ends up with them making some mistakes or abusing their trust, while going straight at a task they cannot comprehend, because they are stubbornly believing in themselves.

]

]
]

Latest revision as of 09:39, 26 May 2021

Redirect to:

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
  • With possibilities: This is a redirect from a title that potentially could be expanded into a new article or other type of associated page such as a new template. The topic described by this title may be more detailed than is currently provided on the target page or in a section of that page.
    • When the target page becomes too large, or for any reason a new page would be an improvement, this redirect may be replaced with an article, template or other project page that is carved out of the target page. See also {{R to section}} and use together with this rcat when appropriate.
    • If the topic of the redirect is not susceptible to expansion, then use other rcats such as {{R to section}} or {{R to list entry}} when appropriate.
    • Since a new page may be created, links to this redirect should not be replaced with a direct link to the target page. To make redirects to this page, use {{R avoided double redirect}}.
    • {{R printworthy}} should be used together with this template when applied to a redirect in mainspace.
    • When used on a template redirect, it will automatically populate Category:Template redirects with possibilities.
When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.