Misplaced Pages

User talk:Abbarocks: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:26, 1 March 2009 editTHF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,107 edits Prescott Bush: to be fair← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:45, 16 November 2010 edit undoMechamind90 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,612 editsm Remove redundant. 
(108 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Request for Arbitration ==
==Welcome!==


I hereby request that my permanent ban be appealed to ArbCom in accordance with the appeal process and that I be unblocked for the sole purpose of dealing with the appeal. ] (]) 20:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:|, especially what you did for ]}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
_________________________________
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> --''Avant-garde a clue''-'''<font color="#000000">]</font><font color="#FF0000">]</font><sup><font color="#FFFF00">]</font></sup>''' 01:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
==]?==
I have decide it is not fair to you as a new user, to throw you into this. RfCs are much too disruptive and contentious. See my talk page for an explantion of what a RfC is, and a good example. ] (]) 01:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
:I would instead suggest ] for you and collect, if you would like help setting it up, I would be happy to help you. ] (]) 01:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
::ok, I'll also just think about it for awhile. I don't want to get into any kind of altercations either, and it's hard to predict what might annoy or upset somebody else. ] (]) 21:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
:::Hello again Abbarocks, if there is anything i can do to help, please don't hesitate to ask. I notice that you have email disabled. ] (]) 01:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

== Your thoughts would be helpful ==

An editor has asked me to look into a slow edit war between them and you at ]. Is there any reason you don't wish to use the article talk page and talk about your edits? There is also a question as to whether this is someone's ]. Your thoughts would be helpful to me. Cheers, ] (]) 11:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

==Deleting comments==
]:
:Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages, though archiving is preferred. They may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user.

] (]) 03:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

#So you know, you've now made 3 reverts on Prescott Bush, and are in danger of violating the ] rule if you continue to edit-war, which can result in a block.
#The accusation in this (which you repeated in a is very bad form: either it is a ], given that the language you deleted was clearly supported by , or it shows that you ''still'' do not understand the ] rule. Either way, you should not make that accusation. ] (]) 04:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
:I don't think that source says the theft was done "for the society"; that's your OR, IS IT NOT? ] (]) 04:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

:::You're joking, right? Your reading comprehension can't possibly be as poor as you're pretending it is, which is making it hard to assume good faith in your continuing this tendentious position. ] (]) 05:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

::::To be fair, it could simply be that you just do not understand the ] rule. I don't know if you've read it yet--though it's been suggested to you several times that you do read it, and you've deleted those notices. If you have read it, and you're still confused, can I suggest the ]? There's also a ] that does nothing but discuss NOR issues. But you should definitely stay away from contentious edits in mainspace until you understand it. ] (]) 08:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

::]. Luck for Collect Dicklyon didn't report Collect either. ] (]) 04:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
:::See, I didn't mislead you with quoting that policy about user pages above, . ] (]) 04:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

== new message ==

{{talkback|THF}}

Latest revision as of 04:45, 16 November 2010

Request for Arbitration

I hereby request that my permanent ban be appealed to ArbCom in accordance with the appeal process and that I be unblocked for the sole purpose of dealing with the appeal. Abbarocks (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC) _________________________________