Revision as of 15:49, 8 March 2009 editAlex Rio Brazil (talk | contribs)461 edits →citations and page numbers← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:08, 31 December 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,694,728 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with unknown parameters)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(119 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|listas=Onassis, Aristotle|blp=no|1= | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Transport|maritime=yes|maritime-importance= mid |importance=}} | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Greece|importance=high}} | ||
{{WikiProject Biography}} | |||
{{WPBiography|nested = yes|living=no|class=start}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
==First name== | |||
Why is the first name written "Aristotle" in this article? I understand that there is a (centuries long) convention of writing the ancient Greek philosopher's name (incorrectly) as "Aristotle", but Onassis is a different person, and his name is "Aristoteles", not "Aristotle". <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
==Question== | |||
In 1896, when he was was born, wasn't Smyrna Greek? The Onassis family, who were wealthy tobacco dealers, lost their belongings when Turkey took Smyrna over in 1922, which is why Aristotle left. And is Smyrna now called Smyrna, or is it called Izmir? If this is right (I'll have to check) this should go over to his bio. -- ] 01:55 Jan 31, 2003 (UTC) | |||
{{rpa}} ] (]) 13:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Smyrna was part of Turkey at that time, wasn't it? Even though the city was largely Greek at the time. -- ] | |||
==Monaco== | |||
:Got it, you're right, Greece only had it from 1919-1922. I think I've got it right in the article now. I also think Aristotle Onassis spent some time in South America but I will have to dig to find out doing what/when. -- ] 05:26 Jan 31, 2003 (UTC) | |||
In the 1960s there were rumours that Onassis was trying to gain control of Monaco. ] reported that they weren't true. They appear to have originated when Onassis gained a controlling stake in ]. Does anyone know any more about this? ] (]) 16:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Draft: | |||
==When was his birthday?== | |||
I've found both January 15 and January 19 when doing Google searches. ]] 23:47, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC) | |||
=== Monaco === | |||
In 1952, Onassis started buying shares in ], which had been making losses. He soon owned a controlling interest. However, Prince Rainier retained a veto over decisions. | |||
He was born in 1900, but preteneded he was born in 1906 to escape Turkey (it behooved him to say he was 16 when he was actually 24). | |||
Onassis wanted to help develop Monaca. He had the idea that ] should improve the image of Monaco, then considered rather seedy, by marrying an American film star. Rainier eventually married Grace Kelly, with Onassis making a contribution towards the cost of the wedding. | |||
== CTI? == | |||
Onassis wanted to transform Monaco from a little-developed principality into a "playground for the rich", but Rainier wanted a greater variety of industries. Onassis sought support from the National Council of Monaco, and there were even rumours that he was trying to take over the country. These rumours were dispelled by journalist ]. | |||
What on earth is a member of CTI? | |||
--- CTI is an important pan-european organization with close ties to Italian maffia. | |||
In 1964, Rainier regained control over SBM by creating 600,000 new shares, to be controlled by the state. Within a week, Onassis left Monaco on his yacht. | |||
==Bisexuality== | |||
== Onasis had Illuminati friends? == | |||
This article does not mention Onassis's bixsexuality. I came here to read more about it. Can somebody please put that in? Thanks. | |||
== Edit of Lead paragraph - Jan 2015 == | |||
I was reading the article on Kennedy's Assassination Theories that Onasis had friends in the Illuminati. Can anyone elaborate and maybe include this in the article? --] 02:45, 9 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
this article was tagged for needing a fuller lead paragraph. I have edited the lead in an effort to address this and I have removed the tag. Feel free to improve upon my efforts. ] (]) 07:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== What is missing == | |||
== Definition of a stepchild -- does it apply to Arabella and Patrick? == | |||
The fact his daughter died. | |||
The infobox lists Arabella Kennedy as stepdaughter and Patrick Kennedy as stepson. Both died years before their mother married Onassis. Is it accurate to call them his stepchildren? Is a stepchild anyone whose parent one ever married? Or is it only if the marriage occurs during the child's lifetime?] (]) 07:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
Details of his huge shipping Empire - there are non. | |||
:Unlike being a biological parent necessarily, step-parenting is an ACTIVITY and Onassis never got the chance to be an active step-parent for them. It's definitely, at least, a stretch to call them his stepchildren. Since Misplaced Pages pages are limited in size, with excessive trivia out of the bounds, I'm sure you can remove said info at will. ] (]) 12:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
kennedy intrigue and speculation | |||
== External links modified == | |||
How big estimates of his wealth are | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
Athina and how she is to inherit through an on-going court case. | |||
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
*Onasis' extensive (and allegedly rule-breaking) whaling enterprise | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070325182652/http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/ to http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/ | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
*Taking over and running for several years Monaco's Societe des Bains de Mer (SBM) | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
*How Prince Rainier III screwed him out of control of the SBM ] (]) 21:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
== 1900 till 1975 = 69 years? == | |||
== Mobil is Socony == | |||
Someone should correct this... | |||
A quote from the article: | |||
:If the above information is correct, his birth year is actually 1900 which would make him 74 or 75 on his death. Someone will need to verify whether the above is indeed the case. -] 21:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
'Onassis made large profits when the Big Oil companies like Mobil, Socony, and Texaco..' | |||
::It's 1906 in multiple sources. The date's right; I fixed the age at time of death reference. ''']''' 16:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Now, 'Socony' is Standard Oil Company of New York. In 1920, the company registered the name "Mobiloil" as a trademark. In 1955, Socony-Vacuum was renamed Socony Mobil Oil Company. In 1963, it changed its trade name from "Mobiloil" to simply "Mobil". So my point is that 'Socony' and 'Mobil' are the same thing. I'm making this little quibble, is all..I think the sentence could be rephrased. | |||
== "Most famous business magnate of the 20th century"? == | |||
While I am at it, I'm reading here about how these boats had Panamanian flags etc. Now, of course, Aristotle Onassis was the most famous shipowner of all. And he was at the peak of his energies and creative powers in, like, the 1950s. And of course, he was seldom out of the limelight during this period. But when was this business concerning Panamanian flags? I quote: | |||
I don't think so. Just because there is an article that says this, it doesn't mean that a statement such as "He is the most famous" is anything more than someone's personal opinion... | |||
] 03:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
'Onassis built up a fleet of freighters and tankers that eventually exceeded seventy vessels. Onassis's fleet had Panamanian flags and sailed tax-free while operating at low cost. Because of this, Onassis could turn a profit in every transaction, even though he charged one of the lowest prices in the merchant navy market. Onassis made large profits when the Big Oil companies like Mobil, Socony, and Texaco signed long-term contracts at fixed prices with him..' | |||
I came here to note exactly the same thing. "Most famous" is not an encyclopedic fact. ] (]) 20:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Okay, I read 'exceeded seventy vessels', when my understanding is that 'peak of 67 vessels' is accurate. Of course we need a reference, but what is the current reference? And about these Panamanian flags..there is a notion of 'flags of convenience' but I find the way that it is touched on here to be rather breezy and tendentious. Note that one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes (one of the world's most important marine trade routes) is the Panama Canal. Being registered under Panama's flag enables ships to pass through, maybe? Note that Panama has the largest shipping fleet in the world, greater than those of the US and China combined. That's interesting, sure, but it's also not simply about Aristotle Onassis. I think it is true, that most merchant ships flying Panama's flag belong to foreign owners wishing to avoid the stricter marine regulations imposed by their own countries. About 8,600 ships fly the Panamanian flag. By comparison, the US has around 3,400 registered vessels. | |||
We have already changed this. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
I find these parts of the article to be stated at an oddly low sort of level, like I'm reading a conspiracy theory -- let's go through some of this: | |||
==Whe must add== | |||
#He was the first one who built the super-tankers | |||
#He was involved with George Papadopoulus general and president of Greece | |||
#He was involved with wales fishing | |||
#He bought a huge part of Monte Carlo <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:10, 16 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
4. Not exactly. Through a number of front agents around the world he managed to buy a controlling interest in | |||
Monaco's Societe des Bains de Mer (SBM), which owns the Grand Casino, several of Monaco's finest hotels, and a | |||
good deal of monagasque real estate. After several years of abiding Onassis's control of the SBM, and calling the | |||
prince by his Christian name, Prince Rainier ordered the SBM to issue a lot of additional shares and give them to | |||
him, thus diluting Onassis' holdings so that he no longer controlled the SBM. ] (]) 21:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
'Onassis could turn a profit in every transaction, even though he charged one of the lowest prices in the merchant navy market...' | |||
== First big step == | |||
I removed this "After hearing a call from an Argentinian film distributor and a senior executive at Paramount in New York about the film star ], " as I could not see wehat it had to do with his importing tobacco from Turkey. if the connection can be established we can re-entert he material. Thanks, ] 18:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Okay, is it relevant, here, that in the middle nineteen‐fifties he ordered five 28,500‐ton tankers at a cost of $35‐million. Mr. Onassis had been told that such supertankers would never make money, as they could not negotiate the Suez Canal. A decade later he and other shipowners were building 250,000‐tonners. You see, the closing of the canal in 1956 by President Gama Abdel Nasser of the United Arab Republic was a stroke of luck for Mr. Onassis, who made millions with his speedy supertanker hauls around the Cape of Good Hope. And where the 1967 Arab‐Israeli was again closed the canal, the freight rate on oil soared from $5 to $18 a ton. By 1974, with the advent of the oil crisis, the price had almost doubled. | |||
Thanks for participation... This information is present in Onassis offical Biography, by Peter Evans, and its present in Onassis Biography in DVD too <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
I am sorry about not offering better references -- I didn't mean to put any time into this. I'm just a drive-by snarker, and no expert on the subject. ] (]) 21:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
:Yes but what does it mean? The link has to be established in our readers minds or it remains gibberish. Thanks, ] 14:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Birth date== | |||
It means that everything from orient was on top at that time, so, he had the idea of importing tobacco from the orient | |||
Lede has 20 January, infobox has 15 January. Needs fixing. -- ] </sup></span>]] 21:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Peter Evans' authorized biography has Onassis born in 1900. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:50, 1 February 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== |
==Who is this guy?== | ||
I've flooded this paraghaph in order to shut up El Greko. If someone can make it a better way, please, go foward. All this section come from the same place in official biography <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Mavros John Jack 'jj' Onassis - never heard of him or any offspring of Jackie Kennedy and Aristotle Onassis. ] (]) 05:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
:That's because it's vandalism. <strong>]</strong>/<small>]</small> 05:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Short description 🇬🇷 == | |||
==Brazil is the first country in this biography== | |||
Well... Looks like im the only one who is inserting more information in this biography. Thanks for the revision that people are making in the text. I wish more people could help in this important article. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
The short description, which should be CONCISE, says the living years twice - “20th-century” and “(1906–1975)”. Either could be removed. ] (]) 15:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Ottoman-born == | |||
* I have a question: was family of the Onassis from Cappadocia or were they still in Ionia, or just a part of his family were Cappadocians? thanks --] (]) 16:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
@] Aristotle Onassis was born an Ottoman subject, on Ottoman land. I don't care even if this fact was a bleeding wound on his soul. I can give you a well example or two of Misplaced Pages articles labeling people born on somewhere other than their ancestral country as a national of the place they born, even if they were complete strangers to that said place. In Aristotle's case, he and his ancestors lived under the Ottoman flag for generations. It is noteworthy that this guy was Ottoman-born, and I see no reason to not mention it on the lead. ] (]) 15:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Cleanup as per tag == | |||
:Okay yeah he was born in the Ottoman Empire and that is detailed on the page itself. I just don't think it's necessary to have it at that specific section. Aristotle Onassis was Greek and the "Ottoman-born" just doesn't fit with that. They were Ottoman Greeks sure, but that's a bit different. ] (]) 16:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
Hi, have been wikifying and making prose more ] where relevant. For ''']''', please don't simply revert straight away (diff here), a minor change that's been explained in the edit box and is about wikifying according to WP:MOS. It will be treated as ]. If you want to practise editing, use the ]. The tag asks for copy editing, if you revert please give reasons. Please understand that wikifying is no insult to someone's writing, but bringing copy into conformity with house style. ] (]) 00:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Why doesn't it fit with that? Why'd you think so? ] (]) 20:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::Ottoman means Turkish. I know you probably mean this as an "Ottoman nationality" but it is not appropriate. All non-Turkish individuals born in lands of the Ottoman Empire are referred to in historiography by their separate ethnicities and definitely not as "Ottomans" or "Ottoman-born", which is a designation kept solely for individuals of Turkish heritage. That's why, all sources unanimously describe Onassis simply as Greek (not even Argentine). Misplaced Pages, as a tetriary source, follows the information acquired from reliable secondary sources. ] (]) 22:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Detail == | |||
::::Then what people born on Ottoman land called collectively, if it's not "Ottoman"? By this logic you must be doing the same with non-Latin people born and raised in Spain, therefore would you not call a Basque person a Spanish? ] (]) 18:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::::It doesn't matter what we might call them collectively, because here and in every article we focus on people individually. The Ottoman Empire, like all empires by definition, was multinational and we cannot really compare it to modern countries/nation-states. In regards to non-Turkish Ottoman subjects particularly, in both wikipedia and sources they are typically refer to by their ethnic groups i.e. Greek, Serbian, Albanian etc. especially if their ethnic group is related to their notability. "Ottoman-born" is arguably irrelevant to Onassis' notability. ] (]) 21:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
Changed "after hearing a call from" because it's either "hearing from" someone, or getting a call as in "After a call from...". Took it to mean he spoke with this person – unless he heard an announcement of some kind. Onassis is such an icon, look forward to seeing this article grow, ] (]) 01:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Hmm.. ''maybe'' you're right. ] (]) 10:58, 15 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Is it time? == | |||
It may be time that this article is moved from start to some other, maybe B, class. I see it as a FA candidate with more work such as including Aristotle's approach to business meetings, the way he dealt with business associates, captured opportunties (could be expanded) by someone more familiar with his operations. ] (]) 07:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
== 1906 date of birth == | |||
Many Greeks left Turkey very quickly, regardless of their ages. Thus the reason given seems to be wrong. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Illuminati query from above == | |||
This search links the family but don't have time right now to investigate how reliable these sources (blogs?) are yet. ] (]) 08:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Problems with the recent addition of the The Greek Colonel Affair section. == | |||
I copy the section here to highlight my concerns with the section. | |||
Objections/comments follow after each problem sentence/section. | |||
===The Greek Colonel Affair=== | |||
{{grammar|section}} | |||
''Four days after his marriage with Jacqueline, Onassis was in the back of a Mercedes-Benz with Colonel ] plus 350 armed men from the colonel's personal ].'' | |||
Comment: What exactly is this supposed to indicate? How encyclopedic is this information? Being in a Mercedes carries no useful information and it is not encyclopedic. | |||
''Onassis employees called this encounter "the second ]".'' | |||
Comment: What encounter? Why was this called the second honeymoon? What was discussed in the car? How reliable is this account? What kind of a book is this? Why is there no other reliable source referring to this "encounter" available to cross reference this? What is the page number? etc. etc. | |||
''Papadopoulos was on Ari's extensive bribe list, and had received in "comodatus" a huge vilage in ].'' | |||
Comment: No other source on the internet asserts this. Only this book. With no page numbers provided either. And what is a "comodatus"? | |||
''Onassis and Papadopolus were planning what they called the "greatest business" of Greece. This project involved building an oil ], ], ], and several ] facilities. This project had the official name of the Omega Project.'' | |||
Comment: No other source on the internet refers to the "Omega Project". | |||
The Omega Project was heavily critcized by people like ], a journalist from Athens, who was under ]. She said that Greece was being sold as a "genuine bargain".<ref name="ari9309"/> | |||
Comment: No other source on the internet refers to this reaction by Helen Vlachos. | |||
''By this time, and after his last marriage Onassis had lost any sense of proportion.'' | |||
Comment: Proportion in regards to what? How is this related to the other claims? | |||
''In the words of an executive high up in Alcoa, "He seems to think that we have to agree with anything in order to receive a dinner invite with him and Jacqueline aboard the ''Christina''. Obviously he saw in that marriage a way to boost his career."'' | |||
Comment: What does Alcoa have to do with the rest of the claims in this section? | |||
''The negotiations lasted for months and ended with Onassis losing part of the project to his arch enemy Niarchos, who in Onassis' words, had to "Put in his *** before he puts in mine" '' | |||
Comment: Negotiations with whom? Since it is claimed that he had Papadopoulos on the payroll and he had a honeymoon with him why did he need negotiations? How encyclopedic are the expletives which were deleted? | |||
''Part of the insucess in this case was due to Onassis OPM formula which created opposion from important people like Ioannis-Orlandos Rodinos, Deputy Minister of the National Economy, who severely opposed Onassis' offers in preference to Niarchos' ones.<ref name="ari9309"/>'' | |||
Comment:What exactly is an OPM formula? | |||
Conclusion: Quite apart from syntactical and grammatical errors this section simply does not make much sense. It is based on an obscure book with a 1986 print date, and its unusual and radical claims cannot be found anywhere on the internet. It should be removed. ] <small>]</small> 17:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Well.... I dont know where did you came from. But before writing adjetives to this book, how about buy it and read a bit? You can buy it at Amazon. Thats the official biography payed by Onassis itself. | |||
:I don't know where you came from either and frankly I don't care. But you cannot keep removing these tags without giving an explanation for each and every point I made above. I just reported you at the ] noticeboard. ] <small>]</small> 23:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
This tags are not facts... Are oppinions of your self that you are using to flood the text. You have never ever made any contribuction to this article. So respect the one who has worked it from the begining. Just dont simply drop yourself here here from no where saying that an official biography is a obscure book. It just show how you totally ignore important things. Read before. It will be better to you. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Please answer my questions above. One by one if you don't mind. As far as respecting the one who has worked here from the beginning no one ]s this article. And anyway this article like every other on Misplaced Pages has many contributors. Who are you referring to exactly? ] <small>]</small> 00:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== citations and page numbers == | |||
You'll find page numbers in the edit text within references; which is why a different ref name is given and the refs seem repetitive. I think I brought up the need to find an elegant way to streamline this on this page asking if there is a way to use ref name with page numbers, but it seems to have vanished. And I don't know how to do it though an article I came across did have this style. (Now can't find it, arrgh!) Maybe the help desk or computer desk might be able to help. Btw, it is the "one book", by Peter Evans, but it seems to be the definitive biography in English. | |||
Some comments fwiw: I cleaned up the syntax and grammar. Which version were you pasting? In good faith edits, imho, it helps to give other editors time to do this work before damning it out of hand – not every editor is a native English speaker. About WP:OWN, of course they don't own it. Doesn't mean it's easy to see one's work hit the dust though (and it isn't me btw). Try to calm down, guys. Just saying, ] (]) 09:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Went back and found I only did half a job. Hid the Niarchos quote until someone wants to ditch it. Now is more encyclopedic. Took out house arrest because the article is not about her, and the army of goons is just "around". Cleaned up some more but the formula still a mystery. Would like to remove the tag about unencyclopedic language if no-one objects. ] (]) 10:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
I totally agree with Julia. The text is completly encyclopedic now. | |||
:I don't agree at all. You still have not answered any of of my questions above. The section is still an incoherent mess. Without the tags the readers are going to be scratching their collective heads for a long time. And please do not remove the tags because as the primary author of this disputed section you have a conflict of interest. If you continue edit warring I will take this to ] as well as report it to ]. ] <small>]</small> 01:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
@Julia: You have done an excellent job but the section is still an incoherent mess with seemingly unrelated and contradictory statements. You removed the expletive section but we still have the Alcoa guy's comments. What do they have to do with the narrative of the section? How is it possible for Papadopoulos to get a whole village in Lagonissi from Onassis and nobody else on the internet to write about it? What is a "comodatus"? What is the OPM formula? How did Papadopoulos give the deal to Niarchos if he had a second honeymoon with, and he was in the payroll of, Onassis? Julia, I thank you for your efforts and your finesse for asking about the removal of the unencyclopedic tag. Unfortunately the whole section is so badly written that no amount of copy-editing can currently save it. The tags have to remain until these questions are answered. ] <small>]</small> 02:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Completly right. Now we'll use the same laws in other articles. Better hurry up now. You have a lot of work to do. |
Latest revision as of 15:08, 31 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aristotle Onassis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
First name
Why is the first name written "Aristotle" in this article? I understand that there is a (centuries long) convention of writing the ancient Greek philosopher's name (incorrectly) as "Aristotle", but Onassis is a different person, and his name is "Aristoteles", not "Aristotle". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.233.179.227 (talk) 05:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
(Personal attack removed) jae (talk) 13:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Monaco
In the 1960s there were rumours that Onassis was trying to gain control of Monaco. Quentin Crewe reported that they weren't true. They appear to have originated when Onassis gained a controlling stake in Société des bains de mer de Monaco. Does anyone know any more about this? cagliost (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Draft:
Monaco
In 1952, Onassis started buying shares in Société des bains de mer de Monaco, which had been making losses. He soon owned a controlling interest. However, Prince Rainier retained a veto over decisions.
Onassis wanted to help develop Monaca. He had the idea that Prince Rainier of Monaco should improve the image of Monaco, then considered rather seedy, by marrying an American film star. Rainier eventually married Grace Kelly, with Onassis making a contribution towards the cost of the wedding.
Onassis wanted to transform Monaco from a little-developed principality into a "playground for the rich", but Rainier wanted a greater variety of industries. Onassis sought support from the National Council of Monaco, and there were even rumours that he was trying to take over the country. These rumours were dispelled by journalist Quentin Crewe.
In 1964, Rainier regained control over SBM by creating 600,000 new shares, to be controlled by the state. Within a week, Onassis left Monaco on his yacht.
Bisexuality
This article does not mention Onassis's bixsexuality. I came here to read more about it. Can somebody please put that in? Thanks.
Edit of Lead paragraph - Jan 2015
this article was tagged for needing a fuller lead paragraph. I have edited the lead in an effort to address this and I have removed the tag. Feel free to improve upon my efforts. Mdukas (talk) 07:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Definition of a stepchild -- does it apply to Arabella and Patrick?
The infobox lists Arabella Kennedy as stepdaughter and Patrick Kennedy as stepson. Both died years before their mother married Onassis. Is it accurate to call them his stepchildren? Is a stepchild anyone whose parent one ever married? Or is it only if the marriage occurs during the child's lifetime?47.139.42.69 (talk) 07:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Unlike being a biological parent necessarily, step-parenting is an ACTIVITY and Onassis never got the chance to be an active step-parent for them. It's definitely, at least, a stretch to call them his stepchildren. Since Misplaced Pages pages are limited in size, with excessive trivia out of the bounds, I'm sure you can remove said info at will. ToniTurunen (talk) 12:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aristotle Onassis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070325182652/http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/ to http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Mobil is Socony
A quote from the article:
'Onassis made large profits when the Big Oil companies like Mobil, Socony, and Texaco..'
Now, 'Socony' is Standard Oil Company of New York. In 1920, the company registered the name "Mobiloil" as a trademark. In 1955, Socony-Vacuum was renamed Socony Mobil Oil Company. In 1963, it changed its trade name from "Mobiloil" to simply "Mobil". So my point is that 'Socony' and 'Mobil' are the same thing. I'm making this little quibble, is all..I think the sentence could be rephrased.
While I am at it, I'm reading here about how these boats had Panamanian flags etc. Now, of course, Aristotle Onassis was the most famous shipowner of all. And he was at the peak of his energies and creative powers in, like, the 1950s. And of course, he was seldom out of the limelight during this period. But when was this business concerning Panamanian flags? I quote:
'Onassis built up a fleet of freighters and tankers that eventually exceeded seventy vessels. Onassis's fleet had Panamanian flags and sailed tax-free while operating at low cost. Because of this, Onassis could turn a profit in every transaction, even though he charged one of the lowest prices in the merchant navy market. Onassis made large profits when the Big Oil companies like Mobil, Socony, and Texaco signed long-term contracts at fixed prices with him..'
Okay, I read 'exceeded seventy vessels', when my understanding is that 'peak of 67 vessels' is accurate. Of course we need a reference, but what is the current reference? And about these Panamanian flags..there is a notion of 'flags of convenience' but I find the way that it is touched on here to be rather breezy and tendentious. Note that one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes (one of the world's most important marine trade routes) is the Panama Canal. Being registered under Panama's flag enables ships to pass through, maybe? Note that Panama has the largest shipping fleet in the world, greater than those of the US and China combined. That's interesting, sure, but it's also not simply about Aristotle Onassis. I think it is true, that most merchant ships flying Panama's flag belong to foreign owners wishing to avoid the stricter marine regulations imposed by their own countries. About 8,600 ships fly the Panamanian flag. By comparison, the US has around 3,400 registered vessels.
I find these parts of the article to be stated at an oddly low sort of level, like I'm reading a conspiracy theory -- let's go through some of this:
'Onassis could turn a profit in every transaction, even though he charged one of the lowest prices in the merchant navy market...'
Okay, is it relevant, here, that in the middle nineteen‐fifties he ordered five 28,500‐ton tankers at a cost of $35‐million. Mr. Onassis had been told that such supertankers would never make money, as they could not negotiate the Suez Canal. A decade later he and other shipowners were building 250,000‐tonners. You see, the closing of the canal in 1956 by President Gama Abdel Nasser of the United Arab Republic was a stroke of luck for Mr. Onassis, who made millions with his speedy supertanker hauls around the Cape of Good Hope. And where the 1967 Arab‐Israeli was again closed the canal, the freight rate on oil soared from $5 to $18 a ton. By 1974, with the advent of the oil crisis, the price had almost doubled.
I am sorry about not offering better references -- I didn't mean to put any time into this. I'm just a drive-by snarker, and no expert on the subject. DanLanglois (talk) 21:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Birth date
Lede has 20 January, infobox has 15 January. Needs fixing. -- Jack of Oz 21:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Peter Evans' authorized biography has Onassis born in 1900. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BadMonkeyBad (talk • contribs) 14:50, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Who is this guy?
Mavros John Jack 'jj' Onassis - never heard of him or any offspring of Jackie Kennedy and Aristotle Onassis. Cross Reference (talk) 05:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- That's because it's vandalism. Tvoz/talk 05:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Short description 🇬🇷
The short description, which should be CONCISE, says the living years twice - “20th-century” and “(1906–1975)”. Either could be removed. ToniTurunen (talk) 15:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Ottoman-born
@Unkownsolidier Aristotle Onassis was born an Ottoman subject, on Ottoman land. I don't care even if this fact was a bleeding wound on his soul. I can give you a well example or two of Misplaced Pages articles labeling people born on somewhere other than their ancestral country as a national of the place they born, even if they were complete strangers to that said place. In Aristotle's case, he and his ancestors lived under the Ottoman flag for generations. It is noteworthy that this guy was Ottoman-born, and I see no reason to not mention it on the lead. Yuzerneim (talk) 15:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Okay yeah he was born in the Ottoman Empire and that is detailed on the page itself. I just don't think it's necessary to have it at that specific section. Aristotle Onassis was Greek and the "Ottoman-born" just doesn't fit with that. They were Ottoman Greeks sure, but that's a bit different. Unkownsolidier (talk) 16:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Why doesn't it fit with that? Why'd you think so? Yuzerneim (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ottoman means Turkish. I know you probably mean this as an "Ottoman nationality" but it is not appropriate. All non-Turkish individuals born in lands of the Ottoman Empire are referred to in historiography by their separate ethnicities and definitely not as "Ottomans" or "Ottoman-born", which is a designation kept solely for individuals of Turkish heritage. That's why, all sources unanimously describe Onassis simply as Greek (not even Argentine). Misplaced Pages, as a tetriary source, follows the information acquired from reliable secondary sources. Piccco (talk) 22:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Then what people born on Ottoman land called collectively, if it's not "Ottoman"? By this logic you must be doing the same with non-Latin people born and raised in Spain, therefore would you not call a Basque person a Spanish? Yuzerneim (talk) 18:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter what we might call them collectively, because here and in every article we focus on people individually. The Ottoman Empire, like all empires by definition, was multinational and we cannot really compare it to modern countries/nation-states. In regards to non-Turkish Ottoman subjects particularly, in both wikipedia and sources they are typically refer to by their ethnic groups i.e. Greek, Serbian, Albanian etc. especially if their ethnic group is related to their notability. "Ottoman-born" is arguably irrelevant to Onassis' notability. Piccco (talk) 21:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm.. maybe you're right. Yuzerneim (talk) 10:58, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter what we might call them collectively, because here and in every article we focus on people individually. The Ottoman Empire, like all empires by definition, was multinational and we cannot really compare it to modern countries/nation-states. In regards to non-Turkish Ottoman subjects particularly, in both wikipedia and sources they are typically refer to by their ethnic groups i.e. Greek, Serbian, Albanian etc. especially if their ethnic group is related to their notability. "Ottoman-born" is arguably irrelevant to Onassis' notability. Piccco (talk) 21:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Then what people born on Ottoman land called collectively, if it's not "Ottoman"? By this logic you must be doing the same with non-Latin people born and raised in Spain, therefore would you not call a Basque person a Spanish? Yuzerneim (talk) 18:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ottoman means Turkish. I know you probably mean this as an "Ottoman nationality" but it is not appropriate. All non-Turkish individuals born in lands of the Ottoman Empire are referred to in historiography by their separate ethnicities and definitely not as "Ottomans" or "Ottoman-born", which is a designation kept solely for individuals of Turkish heritage. That's why, all sources unanimously describe Onassis simply as Greek (not even Argentine). Misplaced Pages, as a tetriary source, follows the information acquired from reliable secondary sources. Piccco (talk) 22:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Why doesn't it fit with that? Why'd you think so? Yuzerneim (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in People
- Start-Class vital articles in People
- Start-Class Transport articles
- Unknown-importance Transport articles
- Start-Class maritime transport task force articles
- Mid-importance maritime transport task force articles
- Maritime transport task force articles
- WikiProject Transport articles
- Start-Class Greek articles
- High-importance Greek articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles