| Revision as of 14:29, 22 March 2009 view sourceMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,576 edits →Pending Requests: m← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 05:57, 1 May 2024 view source Anachronist (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators67,297 edits Wrong namespace |
| (149 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/Noticeboard/Header}} |
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
---- |
|
|
:'''''Clerks and trainees''', please coordinate your actions through this section, so that we don't have multiple clerks working on the same cases at the same time. An IRC channel, , and a ], Clerks-l, are also available for private co-ordination and communication, although the mailing list is fairly low traffic.'' |
|
|
==Pending Requests== |
|
|
''All work relating to pending requests on ]'' |
|
|
*The ''Request for general clarification'' can be archived; arbs who had comments to make have made them, and there seems to be no pending issues. — ] <sup>]</sup> 17:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
** Done! - ''Cheers'', ] 17:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
*Please close, archive, notify Aitias, etc on the RFAR/motions related to him. He's already desyssopped. Tks. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 02:31, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
** Done. - ] 14:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{R to talk page}} |
|
|
{{R from subpage}} |
|
|
{{R to subpage}} |
|
|
}}<!-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This page is obsolete and kept for historical purposes, please use the page above for new comments. --> |
|
==Open Cases== |
|
|
''All work relating to Arbitration cases already opened'' |
|
|
===Scientology=== |
|
|
(od) Various editors are listed in ] who are likely to be mentioned shortly in Findings of Fact. They may not all be aware of this case. Could they be notified urgently please? — ] <sup>]</sup> 08:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:. Cheers, ] (]) 08:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Could the list of editors in ] please be notified that they are likely to mentioned in Findings of Fact? It is not necessary to notify editors who are already named parties. Thank you very much, — ] <sup>]</sup> 12:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Active/inactive arbitrators === |
|
|
:''This list will be used to set the number of active Arbitrators and the case majority on cases as they open. As of 19 February 2009, there are 15 active Arbitrators, and the majority is therefore 8 for all '''new''' cases (that is, those accepted after the "as of" date). See ] for help. The master list is at ].'' |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Active''' (as of 21 Mar 2009): |
|
|
#Carcharoth |
|
|
#Casliber |
|
|
#Cool Hand Luke |
|
|
#Coren |
|
|
#FayssalF |
|
|
#FloNight |
|
|
#Jayvdb |
|
|
#Kirill Lokshin |
|
|
#Newyorkbrad |
|
|
#Risker |
|
|
#Rlevse |
|
|
#Roger Davies |
|
|
#Sam Blacketer |
|
|
#Stephen Bain |
|
|
#Vassyana |
|
|
#Wizardman |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Away or inactive''': |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Arbitrator announcements === |
|
|
:''Arbitrators, please note if you wish to declare yourself active or away/inactive, either generally or for specific cases. The clerks will update the relevant cases as needed. If you are returning, please indicate whether you wish to be: 1) Put back to active on all cases; 2) Left on inactive on all open cases, and only put to active on new cases; or 3) Left to set yourself to active on cases you wish (remember to update the majority on its /Proposed decision page).'' |
|
|
|
|
|
====FloNight's status==== |
|
|
*Would a clerk mark me as inactive on Prem Rawat 2, Ayn Rand, Date delinking, and Scientology. I'm taking a break to catch up on some article work. Leave me active on West Bank vs. Judea and Samaria and MZMcBride (if they open). I'll let you all know when I'm ready to go active on all cases again. ]] 13:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: I've updated the ACA template and proposed decision templates of the affected templates as requested. '''''<font color="green">]</font><font color="blue">]</font>''''' 09:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
====Cool Hand Luke==== |
|
|
*CHL just declared himself for about a week.--] (]) 00:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:He's back. ] ] 22:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====Risker==== |
|
|
Please show me as inactive in anything I haven't voted on from now until April 1, please. ] (]) 22:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Note: Please mark me as inactive for the Scientology case, striking any votes I have made, and recalculate the majority. Thanks. ] (]) 23:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== General discussion == |
|
|
===Workshop guidance=== |
|
|
I'm working on a draft at ] for participants to better understand how to use the workshop page in cases. ANy improvements or comments are welcome. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 04:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
===Changes to Arbitration Statistics=== |
|
|
FYI: I've made some changes to ]: |
|
|
#All the "Arb activity" tables are now sortable (for example see: ]). |
|
|
#The "Cases" section now tracks each case's drafter (see: ]) and ]). |
|
|
#The "Proposals" section now tracks the time order of each action (i.e. a support, oppose, or abstain) on each proposal. This is represented in the tables by appending to each "S", "O" and "A", a number indicating the order that each action occurred, (i.e 1 = first, 2 = second etc.). This allows for computing two new statistics for each arb, "firsts", which is the number of first actions -- generally indicative of being the drafter of the proposal -- and "AVR" (average vote rank), which is the average of the rank orders of an arb's actions on a proposal, following the first action (i.e. the average of the ranks > 1) -- giving an indicator of earlier versus later voting. So, for example for the five cases closed so far this year, encompassing 105 proposals, Coren with 38 "firsts" has apparently drafted about 36% of those 105 proposals, while Rlevse is on average the earliest voter with an AVR of 4.1 (see: ]). |
|
|
|
|
|
] ] 19:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Request for general clarification === |
|
|
Could someone please archive the ] submitted by ]? I believe the arbitrators have already clarified it and the user has not responded back for more than a week. Thanks in advance. -- ] - <small><sup>]</sup></small> 13:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Request for more information about rejected requests === |
|
|
See ]. Maybe some automation could assist, or maybe it is more effort than it is worth. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 14:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
===Regarding "Verifiability/Use English/Burdens in proxy battlefield article"=== |
|
|
Could a clerk please try to identify a suitable wikiproject at which to request admin/experienced editor assistance/advice for the verifiability/sourcing and related issues, and leave an appropriate message? I'm kind of stumped here. Thanks. ] (]) 04:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:I think ] and ] would apply, leaving message. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 04:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Sounds good to me, thanks. 05:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Try ]. ] (]) 11:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:: I'll take a look at it after I've opened the cases. - ] 13:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC) |
|