| Revision as of 15:36, 25 March 2009 edit2over0 (talk | contribs)17,247 edits →Naturopathic education: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:40, 1 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| |}<!--Template:Welcomeg--> | |}<!--Template:Welcomeg--> | ||
| == Help! == | |||
| ⚫ | Hi, | ||
| :I need to discuss some things with you, which I can't post here. Can you e-mail me on dr2rao@yahoo.com? | |||
| :Thanks in advance. | |||
| :Regards, | |||
| :Dr.Rao —Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :: Note that this is possibly the banned user , see ] (aka ], ], ], ], ]). Yours, ] <small>]</small> 09:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == The "half-a-barnstar", for cooperation! == | == The "half-a-barnstar", for cooperation! == | ||
| Line 85: | Line 75: | ||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Half Barnstar''' | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Half Barnstar''' | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For cooperation and compromise above and beyond in the editing of ]! Good job! :-) <small>]</small><sup>< |
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For cooperation and compromise above and beyond in the editing of ]! Good job! :-) <small>]</small><sup>] ]</sup> 00:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == Medical degree - MEDCOM == | == Medical degree - MEDCOM == | ||
| Hi. Can I ask you not to edit the article or the talk page until the case has been submitted and begun? I feel that this would be most appropriate. Thank you! ''''' |
Hi. Can I ask you not to edit the article or the talk page until the case has been submitted and begun? I feel that this would be most appropriate. Thank you! ''''']] ]''''' 02:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :'''''Please''''', going around now and continuing to argue on the talk page, or updating what you've said; will be ''noticed'' by MEDCOM. Just a thought :-) ''''' |
:'''''Please''''', going around now and continuing to argue on the talk page, or updating what you've said; will be ''noticed'' by MEDCOM. Just a thought :-) ''''']] ]''''' 02:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ====Case submitted==== | ====Case submitted==== | ||
| Hi, the case has been submitted for you both. Can you kindly go to the and edit the section '''(Parties' agreement to mediate)''' and add your agreement to MEDCOM mediation below my sig. Please use the format "'''<nowiki>#Agree. ~~~~</nowiki>'''". Please do not edit the rest of the page, except for the section '''(Additional issues to be mediated)''' where you can put additional issues to be mediated if you wish: please be brief and neutral if you add issues. ''I need to caution you that any further edits to the page or further argument on the talk page may cause MEDCOM to reject the case (their rules, not mine)''. Thanks! ''''' |
Hi, the case has been submitted for you both. Can you kindly go to the and edit the section '''(Parties' agreement to mediate)''' and add your agreement to MEDCOM mediation below my sig. Please use the format "'''<nowiki>#Agree. ~~~~</nowiki>'''". Please do not edit the rest of the page, except for the section '''(Additional issues to be mediated)''' where you can put additional issues to be mediated if you wish: please be brief and neutral if you add issues. ''I need to caution you that any further edits to the page or further argument on the talk page may cause MEDCOM to reject the case (their rules, not mine)''. Thanks! ''''']] ]''''' 19:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| '''BTW:''' I've since learned that MEDCOM is not binding, but still should be done prior to any binding processes (eg: ArbCom), As such, I still think that you should go with MEDCOM. ''''' |
'''BTW:''' I've since learned that MEDCOM is not binding, but still should be done prior to any binding processes (eg: ArbCom), As such, I still think that you should go with MEDCOM. ''''']] ]''''' 19:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi, sorry to bug you, but there is a time limit on agreement for the MEDCOM case. Thanks! ''''' |
:Hi, sorry to bug you, but there is a time limit on agreement for the MEDCOM case. Thanks! ''''']] ]''''' 17:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 108: | Line 98: | ||
| ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <span style="font-variant: small-caps">'''] ]'''</span> 22:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <span style="font-variant: small-caps">'''] ]'''</span> 22:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| < |
<div style="text-align:center; font-size:smaller;">This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</div> | ||
| ;Listed at MEDCAB | ;Listed at MEDCAB | ||
| I have listed the dispute at ] as per the MEDCOM mediators suggestion. This is not binding and if you do not wish to take part in MEDCAB, please let the MEDCAB mediator know this when they take the case and they will drop it. As a member of MEDCAB I now need to abstain from partaking in this case. I will be available to the MEDCAB mediator if they require clarification on a point. Thank you both and good luck! ''''' |
I have listed the dispute at ] as per the MEDCOM mediators suggestion. This is not binding and if you do not wish to take part in MEDCAB, please let the MEDCAB mediator know this when they take the case and they will drop it. As a member of MEDCAB I now need to abstain from partaking in this case. I will be available to the MEDCAB mediator if they require clarification on a point. Thank you both and good luck! ''''']] ]''''' 00:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==Mediation== | ==Mediation== | ||
| Line 127: | Line 117: | ||
| I do not fault you for citing that talkpage discussion just now, but another point occurred to me since I stated that not using Atwood MedGenMed in that section. Anyway, hopefully we can continue amicable and productive discussion over at ] now. - ] <small>(])</small> 15:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | I do not fault you for citing that talkpage discussion just now, but another point occurred to me since I stated that not using Atwood MedGenMed in that section. Anyway, hopefully we can continue amicable and productive discussion over at ] now. - ] <small>(])</small> 15:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == POV tag on Homeopathy article == | |||
| Dear Naturstud, | |||
| I'm sure you know that the article on Homeopathy is policed by the skeptical critics and that the article is an attack piece. They aren't even letting us insert the POV tag on the Homeopathy article. I hope you can do the needful (or they may next target the Naturopathy article). Thanks in advance for the help.-] (]) 13:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : Wow! Talk about ]! Take it to the article itself and discuss it there. -- ] (]) 15:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm sure you've read the article on Homeopathy - every sentence there is criticised and no defense is being allowed. I'm new here (although I'm not a noob). Can you mediate/arbitrate and make that article more NPOV or at least tell me how to get someone mediate/arbitrate, without getting blocked/banned?. Not even a POV tag is being allowed on the article. Please help!-] (]) 11:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ⚫ | Hi,<br> | ||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692203726 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 13:40, 1 March 2022
Deleting Natural Remedies
Could you weigh in on the Onion Juice Therapy debate? http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Onion_Juice_Therapy#Onion_Juice_Therapy Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesMMc (talk • contribs) 01:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome!
|
|
|}
The "half-a-barnstar", for cooperation!
You are hereby awarded ...
|
The Half Barnstar | |
| For cooperation and compromise above and beyond in the editing of Medical degree! Good job! :-) Fr33kman 00:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC) |
Medical degree - MEDCOM
Hi. Can I ask you not to edit the article or the talk page until the case has been submitted and begun? I feel that this would be most appropriate. Thank you! fr33kman -s- 02:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Please, going around now and continuing to argue on the talk page, or updating what you've said; will be noticed by MEDCOM. Just a thought :-) fr33kman -s- 02:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Case submitted
Hi, the case has been submitted for you both. Can you kindly go to the case page and edit the section (Parties' agreement to mediate) and add your agreement to MEDCOM mediation below my sig. Please use the format "#Agree. ~~~~". Please do not edit the rest of the page, except for the section (Additional issues to be mediated) where you can put additional issues to be mediated if you wish: please be brief and neutral if you add issues. I need to caution you that any further edits to the page or further argument on the talk page may cause MEDCOM to reject the case (their rules, not mine). Thanks! fr33kman -s- 19:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
BTW: I've since learned that MEDCOM is not binding, but still should be done prior to any binding processes (eg: ArbCom), As such, I still think that you should go with MEDCOM. fr33kman -s- 19:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry to bug you, but there is a time limit on agreement for the MEDCOM case. Thanks! fr33kman -s- 17:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Request for mediation not accepted
|
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Medical degree.
|
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
- Listed at MEDCAB
I have listed the dispute at WP:MEDCAB as per the MEDCOM mediators suggestion. This is not binding and if you do not wish to take part in MEDCAB, please let the MEDCAB mediator know this when they take the case and they will drop it. As a member of MEDCAB I now need to abstain from partaking in this case. I will be available to the MEDCAB mediator if they require clarification on a point. Thank you both and good luck! fr33kman -s- 00:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Mediation
I apologise for not having yet contacted you with regards to the mediation. I will be hoping to work with the two of you in coming to an agreement. I know that communication hasnt given any success but i hope to help out :) I you have any questions feel free to ask. Seddσn 21:51, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations!
You're doing a swell job with the article on Naturopathy. I hope you can do something for the article on Homeopathy as well. As of now, if someone reads just the intro to that article, they will most certainly avoid Homeopathic treatment. You can take some inputs from the Encyclopedia Brittanica and Citizendium (en.citizendium.org/Homeopathy) if you like.
Hi, and thank you for your yeoman's work on the naturopathic medicine article. I am a new editor and placed my first post on the Naturopathic Medicine discussion page a few days ago, going head to head with Sciencewatcher. I added a new section at the bottom of the page called "Unproven Treatments." Sciencewatcher replied quite civilly, and today I added a very, very long rant about what is scientific vs. unscientific, what is "proven" vs "unproven," the limits of the scientific method, and so forth. It doesn't help the article any, but I feel better. Would you like to make any suggestions about where I could best contribute to improving the naturopathic medicine article? Or the homeopathy article. Or do you have any other advice or suggestions? --Little Flower Eagle (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Naturopathic education
I do not fault you for citing that talkpage discussion just now, but another point occurred to me since I stated that not using Atwood MedGenMed in that section. Anyway, hopefully we can continue amicable and productive discussion over at Talk:Naturopathy now. - Eldereft (cont.) 15:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
POV tag on Homeopathy article
Dear Naturstud, I'm sure you know that the article on Homeopathy is policed by the skeptical critics and that the article is an attack piece. They aren't even letting us insert the POV tag on the Homeopathy article. I hope you can do the needful (or they may next target the Naturopathy article). Thanks in advance for the help.-NootherIDAvailable (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wow! Talk about canvassing! Take it to the article itself and discuss it there. -- Fyslee (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sure you've read the article on Homeopathy - every sentence there is criticised and no defense is being allowed. I'm new here (although I'm not a noob). Can you mediate/arbitrate and make that article more NPOV or at least tell me how to get someone mediate/arbitrate, without getting blocked/banned?. Not even a POV tag is being allowed on the article. Please help!-NootherIDAvailable (talk) 11:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)