Talk:Sydney: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:13, 25 October 2003 editLee M (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users13,819 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 19:13, 7 January 2025 edit undoSeasider53 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,507 edits Reverted 1 edit by 88.207.107.248 (talk)Tags: Twinkle Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talk header}}
	If the ] entry is going to mention that city's distance from Sydney . . . Oh, and you might mention the city's namesake.
			{{Australian English\|date=September 2010}}
			{{ArticleHistory
			\| action1 = PR
			\| action1date = April 3 2005
			\| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Sydney/archive1
			\| action1result = Reviewed
			\| action1oldid = 12039613

			\| action2 = GAN
	----
			\| action2date = March 10 2006
	As an inhabitant of Sydney, I honestly can't see why its subway is considered interesting - some details please, or else excise the reference -- MB
			\| action2result = Listed
			\| action2oldid = 43112447

			\| action3 = PR
	: Probably just a remnant of the ] nomenclature wars :-) --Anders Törlind
			\| action3date = October 31 2006
			\| action3link = Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Sydney (2nd review)/archive1
			\| action3result = Reviewed
			\| action3oldid = 84813414

			\| action4 = GAR
	Manning: You don't find Sydney's subway system interesting? You've obviously never gone on a tour of the disused tunnels off St. James station :) -- ]
			\| action4date = September 16, 2007
			\| action4oldid = 158188095
			\| action4link = Talk:Sydney/Archive_3#GA_delisted
			\| action4result = delisted

			\|action5=GAN
	::Sydney's subway is really just the urban section of the suburban rail network. The most interesting feature as far as I'm concerned is that double-decker trains run underground in the city centre. >>>>] 01:15, 24 Oct 2003 (UTC)
			\|action5date=11 July 2015
	:::Double-decked trains are the ''only'' type of trains on the CityRail network, and such that fact really isn't that interesting :) ] 01:19, 24 Oct 2003 (UTC)
			\|action5link=/GA1
			\|action5result=failed

			\| currentstatus = DGA
	::::Sydney is still the only city I know that has double-decker trains running underground in the city centre. If I choose to be interested by that then it's interesting. :P ] 13:13, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
			\| topic = Geography
			}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=B\|vital=yes\|1=
			{{WikiProject Australia\|importance=Top\|NSW=yes\|NSW-importance=top\|Sydney=yes\|Sydney-importance=Top}}
			{{WikiProject Cities\|core=y\|regional_capital=y}}
			{{WikiProject Olympics\|importance=Low}}
			}}
			{{annual readership}}
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|archive = Talk:Sydney/Archive %(counter)d
			\|algo = old(90d)
			\|counter = 11
			\|maxarchivesize = 100K
			\|minthreadsleft = 2
			\|minthreadstoarchive = 1
			\|archiveheader = {{aan}}
			}}

			== Distance from Melbourne to Sydney ==
	----

			Hi guys,
	Again, some discussion of Sin City's criminal past is worthwhile, but the article as it stands gives the misleading impression that the crime rate is extremely high in world terms, which is just not true. Not even Alan Jones can make it so.---] 07:31 Dec 5, 2002 (UTC)
			the distance between Sydney and Melbourne is different on the Melbourne and Sydney Misplaced Pages pages.

			They should be the same.
	I agree - the crime section seems very out of place - wm

			I've also flagged this in the Melbourne Misplaced Pages Talk Page.
	:I've bitten the bullet and yanked it and whacked a great big disclaimer on top. If somebody wants to fix it, well and good, otherwise it can stay well out of the way. --] 04:13 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)


	:: That'sinteresting - it was part of a seprate article in the first place! ( See history of this page) ] 07:35 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)
			Thanks ] (]) 23:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

			== Infobox images ==

			I made an edit that swaps out the skyline image from 2023 with one from 2021, which I preferred as it showed much more of the skyline, including Sydney's new tallest building of One Barangaroo. Upon looking at the images further I think the current pic captures a pretty good portion of the skyline (and has a bit of One Barangaroo in it regardless) so I'm no longer inclined to change it.

			However, I do think we should swap the placements of the Sydney Harbour picture and the skyline, going with the convention that the first picture on a city's article is that city's skyline. Let me know if this is fine. ] (]) 01:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

			:Actually I prefer the top picture to be the one with the Opera House and Harbour Bridge because these are the two most iconic images of Sydney. And the skyline picture could be of any major city anywhere in the world. We don't have to follow convention. Sydney is not like any other city: it has the opera house and harbour bridge! ] (]) 02:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
			::I mean, NYC has the Statue of Liberty but it still uses the skyline as the first photo; same for Milan and the Milan Cathedral, or London with St Paul's Cathedral and Big Ben. I guess there is no hard and fast rule about this, but I do see that cities with modern skylines tend to have it first. Maybe we could have one with both the Opera House and the skyline in the same frame? ] (]) 02:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
			:::Let's see what others think. ] (]) 03:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

			::::Agree we should lead with the Opera House / Harbour Bridge image, per ] - this is consistent with the practices in other reference works (eg ) and is what readers are likely to expect. ] (]) 22:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:13, 7 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sydney article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Sydney was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 3, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
March 10, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
October 31, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
September 16, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted
July 11, 2015	Good article nominee	Not listed
Current status: Delisted good article

This

level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: New South Wales / Sydney Top‑importance

	Australia portal Sydney is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Top-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Cities: Core / Regional capitals

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities
	This article is on the project's core list.
	This article is supported by the project's regional capital taskforce.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Distance from Melbourne to Sydney

Hi guys, the distance between Sydney and Melbourne is different on the Melbourne and Sydney Misplaced Pages pages.

They should be the same.

I've also flagged this in the Melbourne Misplaced Pages Talk Page.

Thanks Fido frog (talk) 23:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Infobox images

I made an edit that swaps out the skyline image from 2023 with one from 2021, which I preferred as it showed much more of the skyline, including Sydney's new tallest building of One Barangaroo. Upon looking at the images further I think the current pic captures a pretty good portion of the skyline (and has a bit of One Barangaroo in it regardless) so I'm no longer inclined to change it.

However, I do think we should swap the placements of the Sydney Harbour picture and the skyline, going with the convention that the first picture on a city's article is that city's skyline. Let me know if this is fine. LivinAWestLife (talk) 01:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Actually I prefer the top picture to be the one with the Opera House and Harbour Bridge because these are the two most iconic images of Sydney. And the skyline picture could be of any major city anywhere in the world. We don't have to follow convention. Sydney is not like any other city: it has the opera house and harbour bridge! Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 02:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

I mean, NYC has the Statue of Liberty but it still uses the skyline as the first photo; same for Milan and the Milan Cathedral, or London with St Paul's Cathedral and Big Ben. I guess there is no hard and fast rule about this, but I do see that cities with modern skylines tend to have it first. Maybe we could have one with both the Opera House and the skyline in the same frame? LivinAWestLife (talk) 02:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Let's see what others think. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 03:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Agree we should lead with the Opera House / Harbour Bridge image, per MOS:LEADIMAGE - this is consistent with the practices in other reference works (eg Britannica) and is what readers are likely to expect. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: