| Revision as of 17:25, 22 April 2009 editEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 editsm →Tenmei to ArbCom clerks← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:04, 13 June 2009 edit undoFloNight (talk | contribs)Administrators20,015 edits courtesy blank page |
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{notice|The talk page comments have been blanked at the request of the participants in the case. The content previously on this page should not be restored, but may be reviewed in the page history if necessary. ]] 01:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)}} |
|
==Tenmei to ArbCom clerks== |
|
|
The following constructive comment was posted on my talk page: |
|
|
* 21:59, 6 April ] posted |
|
|
|
|
|
I need more time to make my contribution shorter. We have been encouraged to please submit our evidence "within one week, if possible." This suggests that I may reasonably ask for more time. --] (]) 02:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The rough draft will be cut tomorrow. I plan to finish editing on Friday. --] (]) 04:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::] characterises my arguments as , which implies that he/she understands something more than nothing. In the same sentence, ] alleges that no one can understand my arguments, which implies that the label "vexatious" is a hollow complaint. This is a bit puzzling, but I guess I probably get the point ...? --] (]) 17:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
