Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Greece–Venezuela relations: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:04, 7 May 2009 editRichard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users195,163 edits *'''Keep'''. We are an almanac-like reference work, and this is an almanac entry. --~~~~← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:03, 1 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(16 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. –''']'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] 13:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}


:{{la|Greece–Venezuela relations}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Greece–Venezuela relations}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
No independent sources provide significant coverage of this relationship. The one salient fact, the presence of embassies, is already recorded at ] and of Venezuela. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 06:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC) No independent sources provide significant coverage of this relationship. The one salient fact, the presence of embassies, is already recorded at ] and of Venezuela. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 06:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' minor bilateral agreements and minor level of trade as per ] (]) 07:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' minor bilateral agreements and minor level of trade as per ] (]) 07:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' No secondary sources, no assertion of why this is a notable topic, nothing to back it up with. Fails ] miserably.--]]] 22:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' No secondary sources, no assertion of why this is a notable topic, nothing to back it up with. Fails ] miserably.--]]] 22:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. We are an almanac-like reference work, and this is an almanac entry. --] (]) 04:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. We are an almanac-like reference work, and this is an almanac entry. --] (]) 04:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
: this seems like a ] argument. see ] as well. ] (]) 04:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Note to closing admin''' this user has posted almost identical comments at other AFDs including , , , . ] (]) 01:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
:::And what is wrong with that? Biruitorul, LibStar, and BlueSquadronRaven all vote in lockstep. Why is my information less valid because I am consistent with it? --] (]) 01:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
::::well I know at least Biruitorul and I '''never''' use the same text on every single AfD and almost always provide reasons. ] (]) 01:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::Richard, I, for one, will not be debating the merits of your argument any further. Any closing admin with a brain in his head will see that your non-sequitor of a rationale for keeping this article doesn't address any concerns about its lack of notability, nor any other failings of it compared to any other policy or guideline. You can call wikipedia William Shatner's toupee from now on, for all I care, it won't change it. --]]] 03:47, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Not an iota of notability. <span style="white-space:nowrap;"><b><i>]</i> <sub>] / ]</sub></b></span> 12:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small>
] (]) 23:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Subject is notable, like most articles just needs expansion. Clear notable economic relations a quick google check informs me. ] (]) 15:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
*''']''' We could really use some help with ], the first of many comprimise merges. Eventually these articles will be merged into the "diplomacy of..." articles.<br>'''PLEASE HELP US''' Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. So much energy has been wasted in these arguments, which could be used on merging these stub articles onto one page. I strongly encourage the nominator to withdraw the AFD nomination. Thanks. ] (]) 16:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' this unsourced stub. I can find no reliable sources that discuss this ''relationship'' in any depth on my own.] (]) 21:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. There is but it's not independent. There's just not enough material for an article in its own right. ] ] 13:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 02:03, 1 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton |  13:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Greece–Venezuela relations

Greece–Venezuela relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No independent sources provide significant coverage of this relationship. The one salient fact, the presence of embassies, is already recorded at Diplomatic missions of Greece and of Venezuela. Biruitorul 06:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

this seems like a WP:USEFUL argument. see WP:NOT as well. LibStar (]) 04:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
And what is wrong with that? Biruitorul, LibStar, and BlueSquadronRaven all vote in lockstep. Why is my information less valid because I am consistent with it? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
well I know at least Biruitorul and I never use the same text on every single AfD and almost always provide reasons. LibStar (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Richard, I, for one, will not be debating the merits of your argument any further. Any closing admin with a brain in his head will see that your non-sequitor of a rationale for keeping this article doesn't address any concerns about its lack of notability, nor any other failings of it compared to any other policy or guideline. You can call wikipedia William Shatner's toupee from now on, for all I care, it won't change it. --BlueSquadronRaven 03:47, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Yannismarou (talk) 23:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.