Revision as of 12:44, 19 May 2009 editIndianwhite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users838 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:06, 24 December 2024 edit undoAadirulez8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users50,940 editsm v2.05 - Fix errors for CW project (Spelling and typography)Tag: WPCleaner | ||
(268 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|A successful attack by Crusaders and Portugal on Moorish-held Lisbon}} | |||
{{Infobox Military Conflict | |||
{{other uses}} | |||
{{Infobox military conflict | |||
|conflict=Siege of Lisbon | |conflict=Siege of Lisbon | ||
|partof=the ]<br> and the ] | |partof=the Portuguese ]<br /> and the ] | ||
|image= |
|image=Siege of Lisbon by Roque Gameiro.jpg | ||
|image_size=300px | |||
|caption=''The Siege of Lisbon by D. Afonso Henriques'' by Joaquim Rodrigues Braga (1840): a Romantic view | |||
|caption=The ''Conquest of Lisbon'' painting by ] (1917) | |||
|date=] – ], ] | |||
|date=1 July – 25 October 1147 | |||
|place=] | |||
|place=] | |||
|result=Decisive Portuguese-Crusader-Christian victory | |||
|result=Portuguese-Crusader victory | |||
|combatant1=] ]<br>] ]rs | |||
|combatant1=] ]<br />] ] | |||
|combatant2=] | |||
|combatant2={{flagicon image|Flag of Morocco 1073 1147.svg}} ]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lowney |first=Christopher |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yHNYF96QXZAC&dq=Almoravid+Lisbon+1147&pg=PA107 |title=A Vanished World: Medieval Spain's Golden Age of Enlightenment |date=2012-12-04 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-0-7432-8261-1 |pages=107 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
|commander1=]<br>], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
|commander1=]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />Andrew of London<br />]<br/>William Longsword | |||
|commander2=Unknown | |||
|commander2={{flagicon image|Flag of Morocco 1073 1147.svg}} Muhammad ibn Hakam | |||
|strength1='''13,000 men:''' | |||
|strength1= {{ublist|20,000}} | |||
*6,000 English | |||
*7,400 Portuguese | |||
*5,000 Germans | |||
*6,400 English | |||
*2,000 Flemish<br> | |||
*5,400 Germans | |||
200 ships | |||
*2,400 Flemings<ref name="Livermore1966">{{cite book|author=H. V. Livermore|title=A New History of Portugal|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=voE6AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA57|date=2 January 1966|publisher=Cambridge University Press Archive|page=57|id=GGKEY:RFTURZQG9XA}}</ref> | |||
|strength2= about 7,000 men | |||
| |
|strength2= ~15,000 | ||
|casualties1= | |||
|casualties2= about 2,000 killed | |||
|casualties2= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Campaignbox Reconquista}} | {{Campaignbox Reconquista}} | ||
{{Campaignbox Second Crusade}} | |||
The '''Siege of Lisbon''', from ] to ] of ], was the military action that brought the city of ] under definitive ] control and expelled its ] overlords. The Siege of Lisbon was one of the few Christian victories of the ] and is seen as a pivotal battle of the wider ]. | |||
{{Campaignbox Moroccan-Portuguese conflicts}} | |||
The '''siege of Lisbon''', from 1 July to 25 October 1147, was the military action against the ] that brought the city of ] under the definitive control of the new Christian power, the ]. | |||
The siege of Lisbon was one of the few Christian victories of the ]—it was "the only success of the universal operation undertaken by the pilgrim army", i.e., the Second Crusade, according to the near contemporary historian ],<ref>], "The Authorship of the ''De Expugnatione Lyxbonensi''", '']'', 7:1 (1932), 50, citing Helmold's '']'' in '']'', Scriptores, 11, 58: ''Hoc solum prospere cessit de universo opere, quod peregrinus patravit exercitus''.</ref> although others have questioned whether it was really part of that crusade.<ref name="West, 2013">West, 2013</ref> It is seen as a pivotal battle of the wider ]. | |||
The ] in 1144 led to a call for a new crusade by ] in 1145 and 1146. In the spring of 1147, the Pope authorized the crusade in the ]. He also authorized ] to equate his campaigns against the Moors with the rest of the ]. In May 1147, the first contingents of crusaders left from ] in ] for the ]. Bad weather forced the ships to stop on the Portuguese coast, at the northern city of ] on ] ]. There they were convinced to meet with King ]. | |||
The ] led to a call for a new crusade by ] in 1145 and 1146. In the spring of 1147, the Pope authorized the crusade in the ]. He also authorized ] to equate his campaigns against the Moors with the rest of the ]. In May 1147, a contingent of crusaders left from ] in the ]. They had intended to sail directly to the ], but weather forced the ships to stop on the Portuguese coast at the northern city of ] on 16 June 1147. There they were convinced to meet with ], who had in 1139 declared himself king of the new Kingdom of Portugal. | |||
The crusaders agreed to help the Count attack Lisbon, with a solemn agreement that offered to the crusaders the pillage of the city's goods and the ransom money for expected prisoners. The siege began on ]. After four months, the ] rulers agreed to surrender on 24 October, primarily due to hunger within the city. Most of the crusaders settled in the newly captured city, but some of the crusaders set sail and continued to the Holy Land. Lisbon eventually became capital city of the ], in 1255. | |||
The crusaders agreed to help the King attack Lisbon, with a solemn agreement that offered to the crusaders the pillage of the city's goods and the ransom money for expected prisoners. The siege began on 1 July. The city of Lisbon at the time of arrival consisted of sixty thousand families, including the refugees who had fled Christian onslaught from neighbouring cities of ] and others. Also reported by the '']'' is that the citadel was holding 154,000 men, not counting women and children; as the medieval account put it, after 17 weeks of siege "the inhabitants were despoiled and the city cleansed". | |||
==Second Crusade== | |||
The ] in 1144 led to a call for a new crusade by ] in 1145 and 1146. In the spring of 1147, the Pope also authorized a crusade in the ], where the war against the ] had been going on for hundreds of years.<ref> | |||
The rulers of Lisbon agreed to surrender on 24 October, four months later, primarily because of hunger within the city. Most of the crusaders settled in the newly captured city, but some of the crusaders set sail and continued to the Holy Land. Lisbon eventually became the capital city of the Kingdom of Portugal in 1255. | |||
The traditional start of the Reconquista is identified with the defeat of the Muslims at ] in 722, see Riley-Smith (1990) p.32.</ref> | |||
==Second Crusade== | |||
At the beginning of the ] in 1095, ] had urged Iberian crusaders (Portuguese, ], ], ] and others) to remain at home, where their own warfare was considered just as worthy as that of crusaders travelling to ]. | |||
The traditional start of the Reconquista is identified with the defeat of the Muslims in the ] in 722.<ref>see Riley-Smith (1990) p. 32.</ref> After the ] in 1095–1099, ] urged Iberian crusaders (Portuguese, ], ], ], and others) to remain at home, where their own warfare was considered just as worthy as that of crusaders travelling to ].<ref>Helen J. Nicholson, ''The Crusades'' (2004) "''After the First Crusade (1095–99) Pope Paschal II decided that those who fought the Muslims in the Iberian Peninsula should have their penance remitted, just as if they had gone to Jerusalem.''" p. 26</ref> | |||
In 1142, during the ], Afonso Henriques, taking advantage of the passage of a group of Anglo-Norman crusaders on their way to the Holy Land, attempted to use them to take the Muslim-ruled city of Lisbon. Although this attempt ultimately failed leaving some distrust among the crusader forces, it showed the Portuguese monarch the usefulness of such force in future attempts.<ref>Villegas (2013), p. 19</ref> | |||
Eugene III encouraged ], ], ], and other Mediterranean cities to fight in Iberia. He also authorized ] to equate his campaigns against the Moors with the rest of the ].<ref>Riley-Smith (1990) p.48</ref> | |||
The ] in 1144 led to a call for a new crusade by ] in 1145 and 1146. In the spring of 1147, the Pope also authorized a crusade in the ], where "the war against the ] had been going on for hundreds of years."<ref>Douglas L. Wheeler, Walter C. Opello (2010) "''In 1147, after a long, bloody siege, Muslim-occupied Lisbon fell to Afonso Henrique's army. Lisbon was the greatest prize of the 500-year war.''" p. 7</ref> Pope Eugene encouraged ], ], ], and other Mediterranean cities to fight in Iberia. He also authorized ] to equate his campaigns against the Moors with the rest of the ].<ref>Riley-Smith (1990) p. 48</ref> | |||
On ] ] the first contingents of crusaders left from ] in ], consisting of ], ], ], ], ], and some crusaders from ],<ref>Cologne was allied with London in the incipient wool trade: see ].</ref> who collectively considered themselves "Franks".<ref>This is the expression consistently used in the eye-witness chronicle of the siege, ''De expugnatione Lyxbonensi'', attributed in the sixteenth century to "Osbernus". The ms, titled "Historia Osberni" by a sixteenth-century annotator, is in the form of a letter, with a superscription "Osb. de Baldr. R salutem" that C. R. Cheney read as ''to'' "Osberto de Baldreseie" i.e. Bawdsley, Suffolk, from a certain "R."; see {{cite journal |last=Cheney |first=C. R. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1932 |month= |title=The Authorship of the ''De Expugnatione Lyxbonensi'' |journal=] |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=395–397 |issn=00387134 |url= |accessdate= |quote= }}</ref> | |||
On 19 May 1147, a contingent of crusaders left from ] in England, consisting of crusaders from ], ], ], ], ] and some ] polities<ref>Cologne was allied with London in the incipient wool trade: see ].</ref><ref name="Phillips2008">{{cite book|author=Jonathan Phillips|title=The Second Crusade: Extending the Frontiers of Christendom|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xMNfrbxQLCgC&pg=RA1-PR14|date=2008|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-300-16836-5|page=xiv}}</ref><ref name="Falk2010">{{cite book|author=Avner Falk|title=Franks and Saracens: Reality and Fantasy in the Crusades|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tKSjW-j2G1YC&pg=PA129|year=2010|publisher=Karnac Books|isbn=978-1-85575-733-2|pages=129–}}</ref><ref name="ConstableZurro2012">{{cite book|editor1=Olivia Remie Constable |editor2=Damian Zurro|title=Medieval Iberia: Readings from Christian, Muslim, and Jewish Sources|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Np10BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA180|edition=2nd|year=2012|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-8122-2168-8|page=180}}</ref><ref name="Livermore1966" /> who collectively considered themselves "Franks".<ref>This is the expression consistently used in the eye-witness chronicle of the siege, ''De expugnatione Lyxbonensi'', attributed in the sixteenth century to "Osbernus". The ms, titled "Historia Osberni" by a sixteenth-century annotator, is in the form of a letter, with a superscription "Osb. de Baldr. R salutem" that ] read as ''to'' "Osberto de Baldreseie" i.e. Bawdsley, Suffolk, from a certain "R."; see {{cite journal |doi=10.2307/2846677 |last=Cheney |first=C. R. |year=1932 |title=The Authorship of the ''De Expugnatione Lyxbonensi'' |journal=] |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=395–397 |issn=0038-7134|jstor=2846677 |s2cid=162571944 }}</ref> No prince or king was in charge of the expedition, and its participants seem to have been largely made up of townsmen, who organised themselves using a sworn oath.<ref name="West, 2013"/> Leadership was provided by ], Constable of Suffolk.<ref name="run">Runciman (1951), p. 258.</ref><ref>Henry was a kinsman of ] of Suffolk, Chief Justiciar of England under ]; the Norman name derives from Glanville, near ] ('']'', ''s.v.'' "Ranulf de Glanvill").</ref> Other crusader captains included ] leading the Rhinelanders, ] leading the Flemish and Boulogne forces, and the Anglo-Norman forces led by ], ], and ].<ref>Phillips (2007), p. 143.</ref> Important decisions were made collectively by the commanders. | |||
No prince or king led this part of the crusade, England at the time was in the midst of ]. The fleet was commanded by ], Constable of Suffolk.<ref name="run">Runciman (1951), p. 258.</ref><ref> | |||
Henry was a kinsman of ] of Suffolk, Chief Justiciar of England under ]; the Norman name derives from Glanville, near ] ('']'', ''s.v.'' "Ranulf de Glanvill").</ref> Other crusader captains included ], Christian of Ghistelles, Simon of Dover, Andrew of London, and Saher of Archelle.<ref>Phillips (2007), p. 143.</ref> | |||
===Redirected efforts=== | ===Redirected efforts=== | ||
] | |||
According to ] there were 164 ships bound for the ], and there may have been as many as 200 by the time they reached the Iberian shore. | |||
According to ] there were 164 ships bound for the ], and there may have been as many as 200 by the time they reached the Iberian shore. Bad weather forced the ships to stop on the Portuguese coast, at the northern city of ] on 16 June 1147. There they were convinced by the bishop of Porto, ], to meet with King Afonso. The king, who had reached the ] and ] on 15 March, had also been negotiating with the pope for the recognition of his title of King. He was notified of the arrival of a first party and hastened to meet them.<ref name="run" /> | |||
The undisciplined multi-national group agreed to help him there, with a solemn agreement that offered to the crusaders the pillage of the city's goods and the ransom money for expected prisoners. For the city, ''"they shall have it and hold it until it has been searched and despoiled, both of prisoners for ransom and of everything else. Then, when it has been as thoroughly searched as they wish, they shall turn it over to me..."''<ref name="O">Brundage (1962) pp. 97–104</ref> | |||
Bad weather forced the ships to stop on the Portuguese coast, at the northern city of ] on ] ]. There they were convinced by the bishop, ], to meet with King ]. | |||
King Afonso promised to divide the conquered territories as ]s among the leaders. He reserved the power of '']'' and released those who were at the siege and their heirs trading in Portugal from the commercial tax called the ''pedicata''. | |||
The King, who had reached the ] and conquered ] in March, had also been negotiating with the Pope for the recognition of his title of King. | |||
The English crusaders were at first unenthusiastic at this change of plan, but Hervey de Glanville convinced them to participate.<ref>The prominence of Hervey de Glanvill has suggested to some readers that Osbernus was an Anglo-Norman cleric with special attachment to him and his house.</ref> Some led by William Viel and his brother, however, refused to take part{{clarify|reason=uninterpretable grammar|date=October 2019}} on account on an earlier joint attempt to capture Lisbon 1142. Hostages were exchanged as sureties for the oaths.<ref name="run" /> | |||
He was notified of the arrival of a first party and hastened to meet them.<ref name="run" /> | |||
The undisciplined multi-national group agreed to help him there, with a solemn agreement that offered to the crusaders the pillage of the city's goods and the ransom money for expected prisoners. | |||
For the city, "they shall have it and hold it until it has been searched and despoiled, both of prisoners for ransom and of everything else. Then, when it has been as thoroughly searched as they wish, they shall turn it over to me..."<ref name="O">Brundage (1962) pp.97-104</ref> | |||
Afonso promised to divide the conquered territories as ]s among the leaders. He reserved the power of '']'' and released those who were at the siege and their heirs trading in Portugal from the commercial tax called the ''pedicata''. | |||
The English crusaders were at first unenthusiastic, but Henry Glanville convinced them to participate.<ref>The prominence of Henry Glanvill has suggested to some readers that Osbernus was an Anglo-Norman cleric with special attachment to him and his house.</ref> Hostages were exchanged as sureties for the oaths.<ref name="run" /> | |||
].]] | |||
===Fall of Lisbon=== | ===Fall of Lisbon=== | ||
] | |||
The siege began on ]. The Christians soon captured the surrounding territories and besieged the walls of Lisbon itself, although the Muslim defenders were able to destroy their ]s. | |||
The siege began on 1 July. The Christians soon captured the surrounding territories and besieged the ] itself. After four months, the rulers agreed to surrender on 21 October because the Crusaders' ] reached their wall (thus causing a one-day standstill) and because of hunger within the city, which was sheltering populations displaced from Santarém as well as "the leading citizens of ], ], and ]."<ref>Osbernus, who adds "As a result, the basest element from every part of the world had gathered there, like the bilge water of a ship, a breeding ground for every kind of lust and impurity."</ref> | |||
After a brief riotous insurrection the Anglo-Norman chronicler attributes to ''"the men of ] and the ]"'',<ref name="David1936">{{cite book|author1=Attributed to Osbernus, probably written by Raol, a Norman-French priest and crusader|author2= translated by Charles Wendell David|title=De expugnatione Lyxbonensi.The conquest of Lisbon.|date=1936|publisher=]|location=New York|page=177|url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015034104094;view=1up;seq=199|access-date=16 April 2017|language=en}}</ref> the city was entered by the Christian conquerors, on 25 October. The terms of the surrender indicated that the Muslim garrison of the city would be allowed to keep their lives and property, but as soon as the Christians entered the city these terms were broken.<ref name="run" /> According to the '']'', | |||
After four months, the ] rulers agreed to surrender (21 October), primarily due to hunger within the city, which was sheltering populations displaced from ] as well as "the leading citizens of ], ], and ]."<ref>Osbernus, who adds "As a result the basest element from every part of the world had gathered there, like the bilge water of a ship, a breeding ground for every kind of lust and impurity."</ref> | |||
{{Quote|The enemy, when they had been despoiled in the city, left the town through three gates continuously from Saturday morning until the following Wednesday. There was such a multitude of people that it seemed as if all of Hispania were mingled in the crowd.<ref name="O" />}} | |||
Furthermore, according to the ''De expugnatione Lyxbonensi'', the Flemish and those from Cologne were the ones who broke their oath but even according to this they were more concerned with plundering than killing any of the inhabitants: | |||
{{quote|They ran hither and yon. They plundered. They broke down doors. They rummaged through the interior of every house. They drove the citizens away and harassed them improperly and unjustly. They destroyed clothes and utensils. They treated virgins shamefully. They acted as if right and wrong were the same. They secretly took away everything which should have been common property. They even cut the throat of the elderly Bishop of the city, slaying him against all right and justice. … The Normans and the English, however, for whom faith and religion were of the greatest importance, contemplating what such actions might lead to, remained quietly in their assigned position, preferring to stay their hands from looting rather than to violate the obligations of their faith and their oathbound association.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Internet History Sourcebooks Project |url=https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/cap-lisbon.asp |access-date=2022-06-04 |website=sourcebooks.fordham.edu}}</ref>}} | |||
After a brief riotous insurrection the Anglo-Norman chronicler attributes to "the men of ] and the ]s", the city was entered by the Christian conquerors, on ]. | |||
The terms of the surrender indicated that the Muslim garrison of the city would be allowed to keep their lives and property, but as soon as the Christians entered the city these terms were broken.<ref name="run" /> | |||
According to the ''Expugnatione Lyxbonensi'', | |||
{{cquote|The enemy, when they had been despoiled in the city, left the town through three gates continuously from Saturday morning until the following Wednesday. There was such a multitude of people that it seemed as if all of Hispania were mingled in the crowd.<ref name="O" />}} | |||
==Aftermath== | ==Aftermath== | ||
Some of the crusaders set sail and continued on their journey around the Iberian Peninsula and were invited by ] to help him capture the city of ] on the ].<ref name="run" /> However, most of the crusaders settled in the newly captured city, thus boosting the number of Christian supporters in Iberia. | |||
Most of the crusaders settled in the newly captured city, and ] was elected ], but some of the crusaders set sail and continued to the Holy Land.<ref name="run" /> | |||
] was elected ] marking the beginning of the historic relationship between England and Portugal which would later form the ]. | |||
In spite of the contractual nature of the city's surrender, a legend arose that the brave Portuguese warrior and nobleman, ], sacrificed himself in order to keep the city doors open to the conquering Christian armies. | |||
In spite of the contractual nature of the city's surrender, a legend arose that the Portuguese warrior and nobleman, ], sacrificed himself in order to keep the city doors open to the conquering Christian armies.<ref>Paul Buck, ''Lisbon: a cultural and literary companion'' (2002) "At its base is the Martim Moniz (in tribute to the soldier who held the city gate open at the cost of his life during the siege)..." p. 118</ref> | |||
Lisbon eventually became capital city of the Kingdom of Portugal, in 1255. | |||
The victory was a turning-point in the ] and the wider ], which would be completed in 1492.<ref>Riley-Smith (1990) p.126.</ref> | Lisbon eventually became the capital city of the Kingdom of Portugal in 1255. The victory was a turning-point in the ] and the wider ], which would be completed in 1492.<ref>Riley-Smith (1990) p. 126.</ref> | ||
==In Fiction== | |||
The siege is the central theme in the 1989 novel "]", by ] author ], which takes a look at the Medieval events from a critical and ironical 20th Century perspective. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{Portal|Christianity}} | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | *] | ||
*'']'', a contemporary eye-witness account. | |||
**] | |||
*''],'' a modern novel about the siege and of the unreliability of historical memory. | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{Reflist| |
{{Reflist|30em}} | ||
== |
==Sources== | ||
*{{ |
*{{Cite book |title=Historical Dictionary of Portugal |last=L. Wheeler, C. Opello|first=Douglas, Walter|year=2010 |publisher=Scarecrow Press|isbn= 978-0-8108-6088-9}} | ||
*{{ |
*{{Cite book |title=A History of the Crusades, vol. II: The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East, 1100–1187 |last=Runciman |first=Steven |author-link=Steven Runciman |year=1952 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=New York }} | ||
*{{ |
*{{Cite book |title=The Crusades: A Documentary History |last=Brundage |first=James |year=1962 |publisher=Marquette University Press |location=Milwaukee, Wisconsin }} | ||
*{{ |
*{{Cite book |title=The Atlas of the Crusades |last=Riley-Smith |first=Jonathan |year=1990 |publisher=Facts on File |location=New York |isbn=978-0-8160-2186-4 |url=https://archive.org/details/atlasofcrusadesc00jona |url-access=registration }} | ||
*{{Cite book |last= Phillips |first=Jonathan |title=The Second Crusade: Extending the Frontiers of Christendom |location=New Haven, Connecticut |publisher=Yale University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-300-11274-0 }} | |||
*Villegas-Aristizábal, Lucas, , Ph.D Thesis, Nottingham, 2007, pp. 146–85. | |||
*Villegas-Aristizábal, Lucas, , ''Portuguese Studies'' 29:1 (2013), pp. 7–20. | |||
*West, Charles (2013), , in D. Bates and R. Liddiard (eds.) ''East Anglia and its North Sea World in the Middle Ages'', pp. 287–300, {{ISBN|9781843838463}} | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
*]. ''De profectione Ludovici VII in orientem''. Edited and translated by Virginia Gingerick Berry. Columbia University Press, 1948. | *]. ''De profectione Ludovici VII in orientem''. Edited and translated by Virginia Gingerick Berry. Columbia University Press, 1948. | ||
*Kenneth Setton, ed. '', vol. I''. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1958. | *Kenneth Setton, ed. '', vol. I''. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1958. | ||
*Osbernus ''De expugnatione Lyxbonensi'' or ''The Capture of Lisbon'' . | *Osbernus ''De expugnatione Lyxbonensi'' or ''The Capture of Lisbon'' . | ||
*Wilson, Jonathan (2016): "Enigma of the ''De Expugnatione Lyxbonensi''", | |||
*''Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies'', {{doi|10.1080/17546559.2016.1166257}} | |||
{{ |
{{Coord|38|42|N|9|11|W|source:eswiki_region:PT|display=title}} | ||
{{Sieges involving Portugal}} | |||
{{Lisbon}} | |||
{{Years in Portugal}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Siege Of Lisbon}} | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 07:06, 24 December 2024
A successful attack by Crusaders and Portugal on Moorish-held Lisbon For other uses, see Siege of Lisbon (disambiguation).Siege of Lisbon | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Portuguese Reconquista and the Second Crusade | |||||||
The Conquest of Lisbon painting by Alfredo Roque Gameiro (1917) | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Portugal Crusaders | Almoravid dynasty | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Afonso I of Portugal Hervey de Glanvill Arnout IV, Count of Aarschot Christian of Ghistelles Simon of Dover Andrew of London Saher of Archelle William Longsword | Muhammad ibn Hakam | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
| ~15,000 |
Second Crusade | |
---|---|
Levant
Iberia |
The siege of Lisbon, from 1 July to 25 October 1147, was the military action against the Almoravid dynasty that brought the city of Lisbon under the definitive control of the new Christian power, the Kingdom of Portugal.
The siege of Lisbon was one of the few Christian victories of the Second Crusade—it was "the only success of the universal operation undertaken by the pilgrim army", i.e., the Second Crusade, according to the near contemporary historian Helmold, although others have questioned whether it was really part of that crusade. It is seen as a pivotal battle of the wider Reconquista.
The fall of Edessa in 1144 led to a call for a new crusade by Pope Eugene III in 1145 and 1146. In the spring of 1147, the Pope authorized the crusade in the Iberian Peninsula. He also authorized Alfonso VII of León and Castile to equate his campaigns against the Moors with the rest of the Second Crusade. In May 1147, a contingent of crusaders left from Dartmouth, Devon in the Kingdom of England. They had intended to sail directly to the Holy Land, but weather forced the ships to stop on the Portuguese coast at the northern city of Porto on 16 June 1147. There they were convinced to meet with Afonso I of Portugal, who had in 1139 declared himself king of the new Kingdom of Portugal.
The crusaders agreed to help the King attack Lisbon, with a solemn agreement that offered to the crusaders the pillage of the city's goods and the ransom money for expected prisoners. The siege began on 1 July. The city of Lisbon at the time of arrival consisted of sixty thousand families, including the refugees who had fled Christian onslaught from neighbouring cities of Santarém and others. Also reported by the De expugnatione Lyxbonensi is that the citadel was holding 154,000 men, not counting women and children; as the medieval account put it, after 17 weeks of siege "the inhabitants were despoiled and the city cleansed".
The rulers of Lisbon agreed to surrender on 24 October, four months later, primarily because of hunger within the city. Most of the crusaders settled in the newly captured city, but some of the crusaders set sail and continued to the Holy Land. Lisbon eventually became the capital city of the Kingdom of Portugal in 1255.
Second Crusade
The traditional start of the Reconquista is identified with the defeat of the Muslims in the Battle of Covadonga in 722. After the First Crusade in 1095–1099, Pope Paschal II urged Iberian crusaders (Portuguese, Castilians, Leonese, Aragonese, and others) to remain at home, where their own warfare was considered just as worthy as that of crusaders travelling to Jerusalem.
In 1142, during the siege of Lisbon (1142), Afonso Henriques, taking advantage of the passage of a group of Anglo-Norman crusaders on their way to the Holy Land, attempted to use them to take the Muslim-ruled city of Lisbon. Although this attempt ultimately failed leaving some distrust among the crusader forces, it showed the Portuguese monarch the usefulness of such force in future attempts.
The fall of Edessa in 1144 led to a call for a new crusade by Pope Eugene III in 1145 and 1146. In the spring of 1147, the Pope also authorized a crusade in the Iberian Peninsula, where "the war against the Moors had been going on for hundreds of years." Pope Eugene encouraged Marseilles, Pisa, Genoa, and other Mediterranean cities to fight in Iberia. He also authorized Alfonso VII of León and Castile to equate his campaigns against the Moors with the rest of the Second Crusade.
On 19 May 1147, a contingent of crusaders left from Dartmouth in England, consisting of crusaders from Flanders, Frisia, France, England, Scotland and some German polities who collectively considered themselves "Franks". No prince or king was in charge of the expedition, and its participants seem to have been largely made up of townsmen, who organised themselves using a sworn oath. Leadership was provided by Hervey de Glanvill, Constable of Suffolk. Other crusader captains included Arnout IV, Count of Aarschot leading the Rhinelanders, Christian of Gistel leading the Flemish and Boulogne forces, and the Anglo-Norman forces led by Simon of Dover, Andrew of London, and Saher of Archelle. Important decisions were made collectively by the commanders.
Redirected efforts
According to Odo of Deuil there were 164 ships bound for the Holy Land, and there may have been as many as 200 by the time they reached the Iberian shore. Bad weather forced the ships to stop on the Portuguese coast, at the northern city of Porto on 16 June 1147. There they were convinced by the bishop of Porto, Pedro II Pitões, to meet with King Afonso. The king, who had reached the Tagus and conquered Santarém on 15 March, had also been negotiating with the pope for the recognition of his title of King. He was notified of the arrival of a first party and hastened to meet them.
The undisciplined multi-national group agreed to help him there, with a solemn agreement that offered to the crusaders the pillage of the city's goods and the ransom money for expected prisoners. For the city, "they shall have it and hold it until it has been searched and despoiled, both of prisoners for ransom and of everything else. Then, when it has been as thoroughly searched as they wish, they shall turn it over to me..."
King Afonso promised to divide the conquered territories as fiefs among the leaders. He reserved the power of advocatus and released those who were at the siege and their heirs trading in Portugal from the commercial tax called the pedicata.
The English crusaders were at first unenthusiastic at this change of plan, but Hervey de Glanville convinced them to participate. Some led by William Viel and his brother, however, refused to take part on account on an earlier joint attempt to capture Lisbon 1142. Hostages were exchanged as sureties for the oaths.
Fall of Lisbon
The siege began on 1 July. The Christians soon captured the surrounding territories and besieged the walls of Lisbon itself. After four months, the rulers agreed to surrender on 21 October because the Crusaders' siege tower reached their wall (thus causing a one-day standstill) and because of hunger within the city, which was sheltering populations displaced from Santarém as well as "the leading citizens of Sintra, Almada, and Palmela."
After a brief riotous insurrection the Anglo-Norman chronicler attributes to "the men of Cologne and the Flemings", the city was entered by the Christian conquerors, on 25 October. The terms of the surrender indicated that the Muslim garrison of the city would be allowed to keep their lives and property, but as soon as the Christians entered the city these terms were broken. According to the De expugnatione Lyxbonensi,
The enemy, when they had been despoiled in the city, left the town through three gates continuously from Saturday morning until the following Wednesday. There was such a multitude of people that it seemed as if all of Hispania were mingled in the crowd.
Furthermore, according to the De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, the Flemish and those from Cologne were the ones who broke their oath but even according to this they were more concerned with plundering than killing any of the inhabitants:
They ran hither and yon. They plundered. They broke down doors. They rummaged through the interior of every house. They drove the citizens away and harassed them improperly and unjustly. They destroyed clothes and utensils. They treated virgins shamefully. They acted as if right and wrong were the same. They secretly took away everything which should have been common property. They even cut the throat of the elderly Bishop of the city, slaying him against all right and justice. … The Normans and the English, however, for whom faith and religion were of the greatest importance, contemplating what such actions might lead to, remained quietly in their assigned position, preferring to stay their hands from looting rather than to violate the obligations of their faith and their oathbound association.
Aftermath
Some of the crusaders set sail and continued on their journey around the Iberian Peninsula and were invited by Count Ramon Berenguer IV of Barcelona to help him capture the city of Tortosa on the Ebro. However, most of the crusaders settled in the newly captured city, thus boosting the number of Christian supporters in Iberia.
Gilbert of Hastings was elected bishop marking the beginning of the historic relationship between England and Portugal which would later form the Anglo-Portuguese Alliance.
In spite of the contractual nature of the city's surrender, a legend arose that the Portuguese warrior and nobleman, Martim Moniz, sacrificed himself in order to keep the city doors open to the conquering Christian armies.
Lisbon eventually became the capital city of the Kingdom of Portugal in 1255. The victory was a turning-point in the history of Portugal and the wider Reconquista, which would be completed in 1492.
See also
- Saint George's Castle
- Portugal in the Middle Ages
- Timeline of Portuguese history
- De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, a contemporary eye-witness account.
- The History of the Siege of Lisbon, a modern novel about the siege and of the unreliability of historical memory.
Notes
- Lowney, Christopher (2012-12-04). A Vanished World: Medieval Spain's Golden Age of Enlightenment. Simon and Schuster. p. 107. ISBN 978-0-7432-8261-1.
- ^ H. V. Livermore (2 January 1966). A New History of Portugal. Cambridge University Press Archive. p. 57. GGKEY:RFTURZQG9XA.
- C. W. David, "The Authorship of the De Expugnatione Lyxbonensi", Speculum, 7:1 (1932), 50, citing Helmold's Chronica Slavorum in MGH, Scriptores, 11, 58: Hoc solum prospere cessit de universo opere, quod peregrinus patravit exercitus.
- ^ West, 2013
- see Riley-Smith (1990) p. 32.
- Helen J. Nicholson, The Crusades (2004) "After the First Crusade (1095–99) Pope Paschal II decided that those who fought the Muslims in the Iberian Peninsula should have their penance remitted, just as if they had gone to Jerusalem." p. 26
- Villegas (2013), p. 19
- Douglas L. Wheeler, Walter C. Opello (2010) "In 1147, after a long, bloody siege, Muslim-occupied Lisbon fell to Afonso Henrique's army. Lisbon was the greatest prize of the 500-year war." p. 7
- Riley-Smith (1990) p. 48
- Cologne was allied with London in the incipient wool trade: see Steelyard.
- Jonathan Phillips (2008). The Second Crusade: Extending the Frontiers of Christendom. Yale University Press. p. xiv. ISBN 978-0-300-16836-5.
- Avner Falk (2010). Franks and Saracens: Reality and Fantasy in the Crusades. Karnac Books. pp. 129–. ISBN 978-1-85575-733-2.
- Olivia Remie Constable; Damian Zurro, eds. (2012). Medieval Iberia: Readings from Christian, Muslim, and Jewish Sources (2nd ed.). University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-8122-2168-8.
- This is the expression consistently used in the eye-witness chronicle of the siege, De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, attributed in the sixteenth century to "Osbernus". The ms, titled "Historia Osberni" by a sixteenth-century annotator, is in the form of a letter, with a superscription "Osb. de Baldr. R salutem" that C. R. Cheney read as to "Osberto de Baldreseie" i.e. Bawdsley, Suffolk, from a certain "R."; see Cheney, C. R. (1932). "The Authorship of the De Expugnatione Lyxbonensi". Speculum. 7 (3): 395–397. doi:10.2307/2846677. ISSN 0038-7134. JSTOR 2846677. S2CID 162571944.
- ^ Runciman (1951), p. 258.
- Henry was a kinsman of Ranulf de Glanvill of Suffolk, Chief Justiciar of England under Henry II; the Norman name derives from Glanville, near Lisieux (DNB, s.v. "Ranulf de Glanvill").
- Phillips (2007), p. 143.
- ^ Brundage (1962) pp. 97–104
- The prominence of Hervey de Glanvill has suggested to some readers that Osbernus was an Anglo-Norman cleric with special attachment to him and his house.
- Osbernus, who adds "As a result, the basest element from every part of the world had gathered there, like the bilge water of a ship, a breeding ground for every kind of lust and impurity."
- Attributed to Osbernus, probably written by Raol, a Norman-French priest and crusader; translated by Charles Wendell David (1936). De expugnatione Lyxbonensi.The conquest of Lisbon. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 177. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - "Internet History Sourcebooks Project". sourcebooks.fordham.edu. Retrieved 2022-06-04.
- Paul Buck, Lisbon: a cultural and literary companion (2002) "At its base is the Martim Moniz (in tribute to the soldier who held the city gate open at the cost of his life during the siege)..." p. 118
- Riley-Smith (1990) p. 126.
Sources
- L. Wheeler, C. Opello, Douglas, Walter (2010). Historical Dictionary of Portugal. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-6088-9.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Runciman, Steven (1952). A History of the Crusades, vol. II: The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East, 1100–1187. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Brundage, James (1962). The Crusades: A Documentary History. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette University Press.
- Riley-Smith, Jonathan (1990). The Atlas of the Crusades. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 978-0-8160-2186-4.
- Phillips, Jonathan (2007). The Second Crusade: Extending the Frontiers of Christendom. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-11274-0.
- Villegas-Aristizábal, Lucas, "Norman and Anglo-Norman Participation in the Iberian Reconquista", Ph.D Thesis, Nottingham, 2007, pp. 146–85.
- Villegas-Aristizábal, Lucas, "Revisiting the Anglo-Norman Crusaders' Failed Attempt to Conquer Lisbon c. 1142", Portuguese Studies 29:1 (2013), pp. 7–20.
- West, Charles (2013), "All in the same boat? East Anglia, the North Sea world and the 1147 expedition to Lisbon", in D. Bates and R. Liddiard (eds.) East Anglia and its North Sea World in the Middle Ages, pp. 287–300, ISBN 9781843838463
Further reading
- Odo of Deuil. De profectione Ludovici VII in orientem. Edited and translated by Virginia Gingerick Berry. Columbia University Press, 1948.
- Kenneth Setton, ed. A History of the Crusades, vol. I. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1958.
- Osbernus De expugnatione Lyxbonensi or The Capture of Lisbon On-line excerpt, in English.
- Wilson, Jonathan (2016): "Enigma of the De Expugnatione Lyxbonensi",
- Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies, doi:10.1080/17546559.2016.1166257
38°42′N 9°11′W / 38.700°N 9.183°W / 38.700; -9.183
Sieges involving Portugal | |
---|---|
11th |
|
12th | |
13th |
|
14th | |
15th |
|
16th |
|
17th |
|
18th | |
19th |
|
Location of the sieges preceded by the year they took place, inserted in their respective century. |
Lisbon topics | ||
---|---|---|
Main topics | ||
Neighbourhoods | ||
Transportation |