| Revision as of 07:29, 25 May 2009 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,127 editsm Signing comment by Aranxa - "→Edit to Harry Shearer entry: new section"← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 09:14, 25 March 2024 edit undoDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 edits update header; yes, I'm still around. No, not for anything that could brew undue conflict. |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<div style="text-align: center;">I'm "around" enough to help on minor bits of code I've written or other related matters, but that's it.</div> |
|
{{/Header}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{/Header|talk=yes}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{User:Daedalus969/talkarchive}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{User:Daedalus969/talkarchive}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 64K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 64K |
|
|counter = 12 |
|
|counter = 22 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
| Line 13: |
Line 15: |
|
<!-- Please leave new messages at the bottom. Thanks! =) --> |
|
<!-- Please leave new messages at the bottom. Thanks! =) --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Nomination for deletion of ] == |
|
== Talkback == |
|
|
|
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 17:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
{{talkback|livitup|Small question}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== tb == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:Roux/tb}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Thanks for dealing with the vandalism at ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] |
|
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to say thanks. Have a great Christmas. ] <sup>(] - ])</sup> has ] at you! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small> |
|
|
</div><!-- Template:smile --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Smile! == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] |
|
|
|
|
|
]<sup>'']''</sup> has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small> |
|
|
</div><!-- Template:smile --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Talkback on ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Tb|MathCool10|User:AntiFetch}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re:] == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{tb|MathCool10|User:AntiFetch}} |
|
|
== "Spelling" Article == |
|
|
|
|
|
While I appreciate your efforts to keep the pages on Misplaced Pages clean, the edits I made on the "Spelling" article clearly were constructive. It stated that "Hercules" is a common misspelling of the "correct" "Heracles." This is factually incorrect. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re:Science debate forums == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{tb|download|Science debate forums}} |
|
|
{{tb|download|Science debate forums}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== A thank-you == |
|
|
|
|
|
*Thanks my friend. You helped me understand many things.] (]) 09:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*I came back again because this is really weird... am I not user 75.21.116.175??] (]) 09:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*I'm only here one more time because it seems I am more than one IP as well, even though I'm poor, alone and have but one PC. Sorry, if you can tell me why this is, that I have 2 IP's, well, there could be $10,000 in it for you :0] (]) 09:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Cheeseburger corroboration == |
|
|
|
|
|
O'Dell's menu, from Los Angeles Public Library menu collection: |
|
|
|
|
|
Menu date (1928), per LAPL: |
|
|
|
|
|
http://dbase1.lapl.org/dbtw-wpd/exec/dbtwpub.dll?AC=GET_RECORD&XC=http://dbase1.lapl.org/dbtw-wpd/exec/dbtwpub.dll&BU=http%3A%2F%2Fdbase1.lapl.org&TN=menus&SN=AUTO3108&SE=1085&RN=0&MR=20&RF=web+tab+report+maya&DF=web+report+maya&RL=0&DL=0&NP=3&ID=&MF=&MQ=&TI=0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cheeseburger entry: |
|
|
|
|
|
http://dbase1.lapl.org/images/menus/fullsize/a/Odells_inside.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 22:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC) (sysilverstein) |
|
|
|
|
|
END |
|
|
|
|
|
=== More re cheeseburger === |
|
|
|
|
|
Cannot understand why "Metropolitan News-Enterprise" is not a "reliable" source here, but IS for precisely the same entry (cheeseburger), note 2--item written by the same person ("Roger M. Grace") less than a week earlier. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 23:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ]<span style="display:none;">''Misplaced Pages Signpost''</span><span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: '''18 May 2009'''</span> == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{colbegin|2}} |
|
|
* From the editor: ] |
|
|
* Special report: ] |
|
|
* Special report: ] |
|
|
* News and notes: ] |
|
|
* Misplaced Pages in the news: ] |
|
|
* WikiProject report: ] |
|
|
* Features and admins: ] |
|
|
* Technology report: ] |
|
|
{{colend}} |
|
|
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ]</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
<small>Delivered by ] (]) at 12:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hello == |
|
|
|
|
|
You sent me some message regarding that I did not appear to be constructive. However, I hate to disagree with you, but I disagree. They told me on here to delink common words, such as United States, certain dates and place names, etc. And then you say its vandalism when I simply delink the word. This site is so hypocritical...and besides, you did not have to message me to tell me that in the first place. ] (]) 16:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ''Não faz mal'' (not to worry) == |
|
|
|
|
|
The deleted edit I restored to Baseball Bugs was Bugs' own, not mine, so you didn't hurt of my own "work". ] (]) 23:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 23:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== E-Mail == |
|
|
|
|
|
I just sent you an e-mail. ] <sup>'']''</sup> ] 02:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Me too. -] (]) 06:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 06:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
===Checkuser=== |
|
|
You were totally justified in running the checkuser, and the editor who complained about the duck test was way off the mark. I didn't think it likely that it was Caden, but it was ''somebody'' up to no good, and the checkuser was useful in determining just who. ] <sup>'']''</sup> ] 06:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:In fact, if I were in Caden's shoes, and that impostor showed up, I would have asked for a checkuser myself, just to demonstrate good faith and get exonerated quickly. In my experience, socks seldom turn up during short term blocks like this one. They're more likely to come from indef'd users, such as Pioneer Courthouse, who figure they've got nothing to lose; or Liebman, who just enjoys being a pest. ] <sup>'']''</sup> ] 06:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
===Liebman=== |
|
|
I should point out that Liebman has been posting this phony "retirement" stuff on my page for like a year. Things must be slow in New York City. ] <sup>'']''</sup> ] 23:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re: Your ] report on Tiaizzylinda == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your report on {{vandal|Tiaizzylinda}}. I have however declined to block for the following reason: |
|
|
|
|
|
{{AIV|new}} |
|
|
|
|
|
If you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my . Cheers! -- ] <sup>]</sup> 07:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Restore request == |
|
|
|
|
|
That user has been blocked indef, there's no reason for a restoration of his/her talk page. The move of it to mainspace was apparently a fit of pique following various disputes that earned him/her a prior block and if you look at recent edit summary you can tell, things were not improving. ] (]) 18:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 18:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::I actually considered restoring and allowing the user to rant on his/her talkpage, but given the user's abuse of it, I thought better and modified the block to block him/her for editing his/her talk page - I'll leave a note on the talk page in case some admin comes by to look at the whole story. What do you get to see in the block log? ] (]) 18:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 18:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: further, on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 18:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
*Good job on RPP. ] (]) 19:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 65.189.154.72 == |
|
|
|
|
|
Y'know, I like an ] as much as the next guy now and then, but really, now, it's just a troll. Let me know if they circumvent the IP hardblock with one of their numerous alternate accounts. '''<font face="Arial">] <sub><small>]</small></sub></font>''' 21:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 22:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Suspicious sock puppet involving Caden == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey just to let you know, the way you approached the Checkuser with Caden was really unfair. It's not so much the fact that you felt a checkuser was necessary, it was your uncivil and fighting tone that has upset me and some other people. Words like this (when Caden had clearly made a mistake and was not trying to be malicious) were uncalled for: "Your rants sound just like an IP user who I got banned, who also referred to me as a she." Instead of ranting and raving, you could have simply said something to the effect of: "I think this checkuser is necessary. Here is the evidence." It is entirely reasonable that Caden was upset by this. Wouldn't you be upset if someone falsely accused you of being a sockpupetteer? You owe this Wikipedian a major apology - not for proposing a checkuser, but for your nastiness. You should have been a lot more understanding of his anger and frustration, especially once he was proven innocent. By the way, HAVE A GREAT DAY! |
|
|
|
|
|
*{{Userlinks|Uikopdep}} Looks like a harassment / fake-encouragement account, like Corpiestre. I've turned this one in for "special" handling. ] <sup>'']''</sup> ] 00:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Wow, I did the exact same thing too, and file a report. You beat me to the chase then. ] (]) 00:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
== User:Uikopdep == |
|
|
|
|
|
I was merely commenting on the reason itself. Many people come to wikipedia and don't write articles. Especially today, when most of the notable subjects are already written about. I'm not saying he/she should be unblocked as he/she is obviously a singlepurpose sock, but to block someone for "not writing articles" seems a bit odd.]rew ]]] 02:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Thanks, but quite antagonistic == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the link to the personal attacks information. I suggest you respond in a less headstrong, confrontational manner in the future. "The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption," is extremely antagonistic and unlikely to elicit a welcome response. Please read the personal attacks section for more information on personal attack severity and suggestions on appropriate warnings.] (]) 06:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 06:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re:PCH == |
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I'll change my vote to endorsing the ban. Cheers, ] <sup><b><font color="blue">]</font></b> | <b><font color="red">]</font></b></sup> 09:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Personal attack == |
|
|
|
|
|
"I see certain editors who never attempt to add anything positive or even neutral to the article. The only things they even attempt to add is negative information. They never try to find sources for neutral stuff or add anything that would put him in a positive light, only negative items. They try to minimize anything positive. You will find those same editors doing the same thing in other articles about people on the same end of the political spectrum as Hannity. It goes beyond coincidence." This poster marginalizes every individual who posts information about Sean Hannity that isn't favorable. I see this is a broad attack against many editors, who he arbitrarily labeled as "Hannity haters". Allowing lies and hypocrisy like this to go unchallenged is not in good faith. So I labeled this individual a "liar" and a "hypocrite" which I still feel are accurate labels, and I still believe posts like his are a greater threat to the sanctity of Misplaced Pages than mine ever were. |
|
|
|
|
|
"New members are prospective contributors and are therefore Misplaced Pages's most valuable resource. We must treat newcomers with kindness and patience — nothing scares potentially valuable contributors away faster than hostility. It is difficult for a newcomer to be completely familiar with all of the policies, guidelines, and community standards of Misplaced Pages before they start editing. Even the most experienced editors may need a gentle reminder from time to time." <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 19:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Given the subject matter this guy zoomed in on, I can hear a duck or two quacking. ] <sup>'']''</sup> ] 12:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*Yes, I said what you quoted. I'm sorry if calling a group who's sole contribution is to add any negative thing they can find as "haters" offends you. But apparently you have not read ] and it would probably help you if you did so. |
|
|
|
|
|
] Daedalus I know you act in good faith - but perhaps a slightly lighter touch might elicit results more benficial to the editorial community perhaps? ] (]) 20:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
{{talkback|Amicaveritas}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== I am so sorry == |
|
|
|
|
|
I am so sorry that ] treated you so poorly, using both insults and thinly veiled threats to discourage your point of view. I am disturbed by the lack of response to your complaint, and I am disgusted in the way you were treated for making that complaint. I truly wish that Misplaced Pages administrators as a whole comported themselves with more respect and dignity. It whole matter really cheapens the idea that administrators should be impartial enforcers of consensus based policy. I truly think Misplaced Pages would be better off without those administrators who find themselves above policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately there is an atmosphere of tolerance towards this sort of thing so there is absolutely nothing I can do that would not simply be reversed. I am sorry. ] 00:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re: ANI report == |
|
|
|
|
|
I did read the discussion. It doesn't change my response in the slightest. If people stepped away from Giano in the first place, none of this extra drama would have happened. --<font color="#cc6600">]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 02:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Bishonen blocked == |
|
|
|
|
|
Just in case you were not aware, Jimbo Wales himself has blocked Bishonen for three hours for "Incivility unbecoming an admin" - hopefully that will act as a wake up call so we can avoid a repeat of this performance. ] (]) 02:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== User:MarkRomero == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Because I've worked quite a bit with {{User|MarkRomero}}, I am concerned about your edit . Can you explain it and the related summary? Are you saying that {{User|MarkRomero}} is not now {{User|Voltin}}? Thanks! →] (]) 14:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 18:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately, not being party to the email messages, I'm still confused. Is MarkRomero now Voltin? Do I have reason to distrust either of these users? →] (]) 19:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 20:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Thank you. I think I understand now. →] (]) 22:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Bishonen's alternate accounts == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hiya Daedalus. It's cool, those accounts are just ''joke userpagers''. ] (]) 22:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re: Do me a favor == |
|
|
I just re-read the two edits I made which refer to your conflict with Bishonen, & I honestly don't see how they make any judgments about you. About Bishonen, I do comment at length about her state of mind. I also say her comment to you was offensive & insulting. And I state how I think other people view the situation -- which is why I suggest you let the matter drop. I would apologize for upsetting you, except I don't know how I did. -- ] (]) 23:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 23:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Daedalus, I didn't mean to imply that you knew that. I was explaining to you that other editors knew that, assumed you did also, & that is why they responded in that manner. Maybe you should take the evening off, & do something not directly related to Misplaced Pages. -- ] (]) 00:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Wikihounding== |
|
|
This is a warning about ]. You need to leave Bishonen alone. Stop stoking the fires of that dispute. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Andy Wisne article == |
|
|
I have recreated th article. I have been through hell and back and I have buddys that have pges on hre simply for being a Notre Dame football player which is considered notable. I have listed referances from the LA Times to a first place story that was written about my bout with bipolar disorder, near death experiences, Notre Dame plaing days, and being an actor. Ihave no idea how one could consider that non substantial, irrelevent, or non notable unless there was a subjective viewpoint as this did not breach neautral point of view. I have ha\d to fight my ass off for everything I've gotten all I'm asking for is that this be understood as notable as it is.- There are millions of readers of the LA Times,and Millions of Notre Dame viewers. Thank you for listening Daedalus <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 05:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::This guy deserves a break and what he has done all together is notable.- Myself <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
::: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 05:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==If you find something wrong my userpage, or you want to change something, please let me know first, as a courtesy. == |
|
|
The right hand side of your user page is (in Internet Explorer at least) a mess - the objects float over each other and the objects below are obfuscated, which makes those on top difficult to read, I was going to try to fix this, but you have the above message on the page.--] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 08:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: Not surprising; there are <span class="plainlinks"></span> of issues in there. Cheers, ] 12:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 18:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Inspired by Joyce? == |
|
|
|
|
|
I ask out of curiosity: Is your name inspired by ]'s Stephen Dedalus of '']''? ] 12:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 18:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Threat by SPA == |
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't you STOP taking away my edit to the foot fetish article. I am a foot fetishist myself and it sickens me that the wikipedia article lists TREATMENT like its a fucking disease. If you continue to back edit it, I will log on to wiki every day with the sole purpose of causing trouble for you.<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|
|
: on your talk page.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 19:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Just a bit of support for all you are going through with the author of the article. Deep cleansing breaths always help me. 8-) ] (]) 22:59, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Edit to Harry Shearer entry == |
|
|
|
|
|
I received a notice that my edit to the Harry Shearer listing may not fit with Wiki's neutral content policy. My addition was that Harry Shearer writes on the "poor response of the United States government" to Hurricane Katrina. The qualification of "poor" response is not mine. It is the actual topic of Mr. Shearer's referred to blog entries. I was stating a fact of the content of Mr. Shearer's writing, it was not added as my personal opinion of anything. Therefore, it should not be construed as non neutral content. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
Template:SPIHat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)