Revision as of 05:00, 26 May 2009 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 editsm →Co-founder dispute rumbles on and on (Revisionism)← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 09:00, 9 January 2025 edit undoChipmunkdavis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,777 editsm Reverted edit by 185.79.101.24 (talk) to last version by Nagae IkuTag: Rollback |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{skiptotoctalk}} |
|
|
|
{{Article history |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
|
|
| action1 = AFD |
|
{{WikiProject Computing|class=B|importance=|nested=yes}} |
|
|
|
| action1date = 14 October 2005 |
|
{{WPBiography|class=B|priority=Mid|living=yes|listas=Wales, Jimmy|nested=yes}} |
|
|
|
| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales |
|
{{WikiProject Misplaced Pages|class=B|importance=Top|nested=yes}} |
|
|
|
| action1result = kept |
|
{{WP Internet|class=B|importance=Mid|nested=yes}} |
|
|
|
| action1oldid = 14579563 |
|
{{WikiProject Alabama|class=B|nested=yes}} |
|
|
{{WP1.0|WPCD=people|class=B|importance=Mid|priority=Mid|nested=yes}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{talkheader|search=yes}} |
|
|
<!-- <inputbox> |
|
|
bgcolor=transparent |
|
|
type=fulltext |
|
|
prefix=Talk:Jimmy Wales |
|
|
break=yes |
|
|
width=60 |
|
|
searchbuttonlabel=Search Jimmy Wales talk archives |
|
|
</inputbox> no longer needed--> |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
|action1=AFD |
|
|
|action1date=2005-10-14 |
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales |
|
|
|action1result=kept |
|
|
|action1oldid=25464126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action2=PR |
|
| action2 = AFD |
|
|action2date=23:22, 15 June 2006 |
|
| action2date = 14 August 2007 |
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Jimmy Wales/archive1 |
|
| action2link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (2nd nomination) |
|
|action2result=reviewed |
|
| action2result = speedily kept |
|
|action2oldid=58840827 |
|
| action2oldid = 151188864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action3=GAN |
|
| action3 = AFD |
|
|action3date=2006-07-05 |
|
| action3date = 31 August 2007 |
|
|
| action3link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (3rd nomination) |
|
|action3result=listed |
|
|
|
| action3result = speedily kept |
|
|action3oldid=62024022 |
|
|
|
| action3oldid = 154846896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action4=FAC |
|
| action4 = GAN |
|
|action4date=2006-10-10 |
|
| action4date = 25 March 2012 |
|
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Jimmy Wales/archive1 |
|
| action4link = Talk:Jimmy Wales/GA1 |
|
|action4result=not promoted |
|
| action4result = failed |
|
|action4oldid=80703703 |
|
| action4oldid = 477279005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action5=GAR |
|
|action5 = AFD |
|
|action5date=2006-10-17 |
|
|action5date = 14:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Good articles/Disputes/Archive 8#Jimmy Wales |
|
|action5link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (8th nomination) |
|
|action5result=kept |
|
|action5result = speedily kept |
|
|action5oldid=81895538 |
|
|action5oldid = 758452878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|currentstatus = FGAN |
|
|action6=PR |
|
|
|
|topic = Social sciences and society |
|
|action6date=2007-06-13 |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Jimmy Wales/archive2 |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes |collapsed=yes |class=B |vital=yes |listas=Wales, Jimmy |1= |
|
|action6result=reviewed |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Misplaced Pages|importance=Top}} |
|
|action6oldid=137788265 |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Mid |websites=yes |websites-importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low |IN=yes |IN-importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Alabama}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Objectivism|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Open |importance=High}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
<!-- Inactive Projects --> |
|
|
<!-- End of Inactive Projects --> |
|
|
{{Press |
|
|
| subject = article |
|
|
| author = Yermi Brenner |
|
|
| title = Taking On Misplaced Pages's Bias |
|
|
| org = Medium |
|
|
| url = https://medium.com/better-humans/11acd4a7f44c |
|
|
| date = {{date|24 June 2013}} |
|
|
| quote = |
|
|
| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/6ITfm2rhu |
|
|
| archivedate = {{date|28 July 2013}} |
|
|
| accessdate = {{date|28 July 2013}} |
|
|
|
|
|
| author2 = Madeleine Spence |
|
|
| title2 = Larry Sanger: ‘I wouldn’t trust Misplaced Pages — and I helped to invent it’ |
|
|
| org2 = The Sunday Times |
|
|
| url2 = https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/larry-sanger-i-wouldnt-trust-wikipedia-and-i-helped-to-invent-it-cflrhmdhx |
|
|
| date2 = {{date|1 August 2021}} |
|
|
| quote2 = |
|
|
| archiveurl2 = |
|
|
| archivedate2 = |
|
|
| accessdate2 = |
|
|
|
|
|
| author3 = ] |
|
|
| title3 = VIPs expect special treatment. At Misplaced Pages, don’t even ask. |
|
|
| org3 = ] |
|
|
| url3 = https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/wikipedia-jimmy-wales-john-eastman-editing/2021/10/28/f2d61bea-35fd-11ec-9bc4-86107e7b0ab1_story.html |
|
|
| date3 = 28 October 2021 |
|
|
| quote3 = |
|
|
| accessdate3 = 29 October 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| author4 = ] |
|
|action7=AFD |
|
|
|
| title4 = Misplaced Pages's Jimmy Wales Has Already Solved the Internet's Problems |
|
|action7date=2007-08-14 |
|
|
|
| org4 = ] |
|
|action7link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (2nd nomination) |
|
|
|
| url4 = https://reason.com/video/2022/04/28/wikipedias-jimmy-wales-has-already-solved-the-internets-problems/ |
|
|action7result=speedily kept |
|
|
|
| date4 = 28 April 2022 |
|
|action7oldid=151226064 |
|
|
|
| quote4 = |
|
|
| accessdate4 = 6 May 2022 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Notable Wikipedian|Jimbo Wales|declared=yes|editedhere=yes}} |
|
|
{{tmbox|type=content|class=tmbox-talk-notice|text= |
|
|
<big>This talk page is '''only for discussions concerning Misplaced Pages's article on Jimmy Wales'''.</big> |
|
|
* '''To talk to Jimmy Wales himself''', please use ''']'''. |
|
|
* '''To get help with general Misplaced Pages questions''', see the ''']'''. |
|
|
* '''To discuss Misplaced Pages policy or practices''', see the ''']'''. |
|
|
* '''For other useful links''', see the ''']'''.}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{merged-from|Jimmy Wales Foundation|14 December 2020}} |
|
|action8=AFD |
|
|
|
{{pp-move-indef}} |
|
|action8date=2007-08-31 |
|
|
|action8link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (3rd nomination) |
|
|
|action8result=speedily kept |
|
|
|action8oldid=154849721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action9=GAR |
|
|
|action9date=2007-12-20 |
|
|
|action9link=/GA3 |
|
|
|action9result=delisted |
|
|
|action9oldid=178824205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action10=GAN |
|
|
|action10date=15:01, 16 September 2008 |
|
|
|action10link=Talk:Jimmy Wales/GA4 |
|
|
|action10result=listed |
|
|
|action10oldid=238817156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action11=GAR |
|
|
|action11date=09:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|action11link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Jimmy Wales/1 |
|
|
|action11result=delisted |
|
|
|action11oldid=277600818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|currentstatus=DGA |
|
|
|topic=engtech |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{|class="messagebox standard-talk" style="text-align: left;" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|] |
|
|
|'''If you need to contact Jimbo about something, please do so at ], not here.''' As Jimbo explains... |
|
|
"People who are trying to leave messages for me will likely be more satisfied if they leave messages on my ] than if they leave them here. This is the talk page for the article about me, not a place to talk to me. I rarely read this. --] 06:05, 23 August 2005 (UTC)" |
|
|
|} |
|
|
{{Talk Spoken Misplaced Pages|Jimmy_Wales.ogg|small=yes}} |
|
|
{|class="infobox standard-talk" style="width:238px;" |
|
|
| Birthdate discussions can be found ] |
|
|
|} |
|
|
{{wikipedian-bio|Jimbo Wales|Wales, Jimbo|editedhere=yes|small=yes}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|target=Talk:Misplaced Pages/Archive index |
|
|target=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive index |
|
|mask=Talk:Misplaced Pages/Archive <#> |
|
|mask=Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive <#> |
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|indexhere=no |
|
|indexhere=no |
|
}}<!-- |
|
}} |
|
-->{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{atnhead}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 200K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|counter = 12 |
|
|counter = 14 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|algo = old(7d) |
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|archive = Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Jimmy Wales/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}}<!-- |
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
-->{{AutoArchivingNotice |
|
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
|
|small=yes |
|
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|age=7 |
|
|
|
|indexhere=yes}} |
|
|bot=MiszaBot I}}<!-- |
|
|
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
== Date/age issue == |
|
--> |
|
|
{{onlinesource |
|
|
| year = 2009 |
|
|
| title = How I fell in love with Misplaced Pages |
|
|
| author = Nicholson Baker |
|
|
| date = Thursday 10 April 2008 |
|
|
| month = April |
|
|
| url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/apr/10/wikipedia.internet |
|
|
| org = The Guardian |
|
|
| section = News:Technology:Misplaced Pages |
|
|
| collapsed=yes |
|
|
| small=yes}} |
|
|
{{pressmulti|collapsed=yes|author=] |date=2009-02-03 |url=http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/is-wikipedia-cracking-up-1625816.html|title=Is Misplaced Pages cracking up?|org=] |section=February 2009|small=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== How much did Wales/Bomis spend on Misplaced Pages? == |
|
|
|
|
|
''The Seattle Times'' Wales "draws no income from Misplaced Pages, which cost him $500,000 to launch", while '']'' Wales "spent $100,000 (£60,000) of Bomis's money developing Misplaced Pages before creating a not-for-profit organisation to run the burgeoning encyclopedia". So either Wales invested 400k of his own cash or at least one of these claims is wrong. Anyone got any insight or further sources on this? ] 16:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:From the Cynthia Barnett article, cited in Rosenzweig:<br/> |
|
|
::"Wales estimates he spent $500,000 in Misplaced Pages's first three years to get it up and running. For the past two years, the project's annual budget of $500,000 has been funded fully with donations and grants, most of them small."<br/> |
|
|
:Ottre 17:48, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Also, ProQuest gives the full cite as |
|
|
::<small>Cynthia Barnett. '']''. St. Petersburg, FLA: Sep 01, 2005. Vol. 48, Iss. 5; pg. 62</small> |
|
|
:Ottre 17:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Thanks, that's helpful. ] 20:28, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::You're most welcome. Ottre 20:43, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
So the naive verificationist position here would be to state that Wales (estimates to have) spent 500k, including 100k from Bomis, on Misplaced Pages before turning it over to the WMF. I'm not entirely confident that is an accurate representation of what actually happened. Should we go with this in the absence of contradicting sources, only quote the sources' claims, or leave out the point entirely? ] 21:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Misplaced Pages was paid for via Bomis with two other parteners. It was not Wales alone. ] (]) 21:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Can you provide a reference for that? It seems to contradict Wales' statements above and , as well as ''The Seattle Times''{{'}} article above. ] 21:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: We know there was two other partners who have been written out of Misplaced Pages. The other partners spent a lot of money too but Wales takes credit for that. Wales thrust himself into the media spotlight while the other partners did not want the media attention. The two other business partners had to bring money to the table. I find it odd Wales claims to be the sole founder because Misplaced Pages was part of Bomis when there was two other parteners who have vanished from the history of Misplaced Pages. Who told the media Wales spent money on Misplaced Pages while not mentioning the other partners. Hmmm. What you are reading in reliable sources is what they were told and what Wales wants you to believe. ] (]) 22:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I've contacted ] to see if he can shed any light on the matter. Ottre 22:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::There is no evidence Wales directly spent any money on Misplaced Pages. All payments were made by Bomis which had two other partners. ] (]) 22:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I would read the above as 100K spent before the Foundation was created, and 500K-100K = 400K afterwards (not sure if that's accurate, just a way to resolve the two claims). Here is a reference about funding coming from Bomis's corporate account, not Wales's personal money - though to be fair it was Wales's decision to spend that business money on Misplaced Pages. In "So long as wikipedia is part of Bomis, Inc., my costs are tax deductible as ordinary business expenses, with no paperwork and no complicated justifications to the IRS. I just spend money, the company is that much less profitable, and that's that. Any benefit to Bomis is highly intangible, but that's fine." -- ] (]) 22:28, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:By the way, checking over the , I don't see how he comes up with 500K. I know he's said it, i.e. it's not a misquote. But it's very unclear to me how he reaches that sum, since e.g. the June 30 2004 numbers are 80K of income and 23K of expenses. I'd assume earlier numbers are even less. So how does he get to 500K from that? Someone should ask him, though it probably shouldn't be me (and take care in following-up the answer) -- ] (]) 00:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
UPDATE: Never heard back from Levy. No good reason to believe he is a reliable source on where the money came from, so I'm going with Seth on this. Ottre 21:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== References in the lead == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{hatnote|Previous discussion section: ]}} |
|
|
] indicates that references are needed for controversial or complex claims, and for contentious information about living people. Outside of the co-founder dispute, I really don't see any claims of sufficient acrimony – and outside the birthday there are none complex enough – to require referencing under this understanding. To survey the most recently-promoted featured biographies, it's clear that citations in the lead section are unconventional in the encyclopaedia's best work: |
|
|
*] (no citations in lead) |
|
|
*] (six citations) |
|
|
*] (no citations) |
|
|
*] (none) |
|
|
*] (none) |
|
|
*] (none) |
|
|
*] (none) |
|
|
*] (one citation, for a quotation) |
|
|
*] (one citation, again for a quotation) |
|
|
*] (none) |
|
|
*] (none) |
|
|
*] (none) |
|
|
*] (three) |
|
|
This article, in contrast, has '''twenty two''' citations in the lead, with two additional requests for citation – even thought the claims are clearly supported in the body of the article. I propose that this is bad practice, introduces redundancy and makes the the introduction aesthetically unappealing, more difficult to read and more apparently controversial than it in fact is. I propose we restrict citations to claims likely to be contested. ] 21:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Oppose'''. Everything else in the lead is cited except for two sentences. I propose we improve the lead by adding two refs. ] (]) 21:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Support'''. The main thing is to engage our readers, and having so many references in the lead is ''preconventional''. It's certainly not formal practice for a biography.<br/><br/>I was just reading a book put out by that cites Misplaced Pages articles for several of the concepts it discusses. It's very likely that we'll have scholarly books on Misplaced Pages within a year or two, so I think we should actually start deleting the unnecessary refs. Ottre 22:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Oppose''' Due to the extreme circumstances of Wales's position within Misplaced Pages, I believe it is necessary to have as many references as possible to keep down the edit-wars and talk-page debates. Yes, I certainly understand the point that it's a stylistic drag. However, in terms of making trade-offs, I would contend the experience of this article shows it's necessary to be as much as possible on the side of safety and citations. Perhaps some of the articles above are in fact under-referenced, rather than being a norm for emulation. -- ] (]) 22:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Support'''. Only exceptional claims need to be referenced in the lead. As long as everything else is referenced in the body, it's good to be summarized without citation in the lead. ]] 14:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Oppose''' we must reference all controversial claims in the lead. Any unref'd and controversial material in the lead must be removed, and lets face it there are at least 2 highly controversial assertions in the lead. Trying to remove these refs smacks of trying to play down the controversies as if somehow he really was the co-founder instead of this just being opinion, albeit ref'd opinion, ie I am suspicious of the motives of those who want to remove refs to disputed and controversial material in the lead. All it will do is make the article less NPOV than ever, and indeed imply that the article is not controversial. Thanks, ] 14:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
*:SqueakBox, my proposal ''is'' to reference all controversial claims in the lead section, and the co-founder claim is one I explicitly specified as needing citation. What I don't see as requiring redundant references are claims like "During his graduate studies taught at two universities", "In 2004, co-founded Wikia, a privately-owned, free Web-hosting service, with fellow Wikimedia trustee Angela Beesley" or " self-identifies as an Objectivist and, with reservations, a libertarian". ] 18:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
*:{{edit conflict}} SqueakBox, it seems that you perhaps misread a portion of the proposal. The contention is that ''everything'' is being sourced in the lead, and that it is unnecessary. Not to say there should be no sources in the lead, but that not everything about Jimmy Wales is controversial. Claims likely to be contested, or extraordinary claims (as I put it), in my mind, both fall under the term "controversial claims". Thus, those would be cited in the lead. However, other non-controversial claims, already sourced in the body, would not be cited per ]. This would lighten the disruption caused on the flow, and it would prevent Jimmy from seeming more controversial than he really is. ]] 18:53, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a date/age issue in the second paragraph of the "Early life and education section". "When he was three, in 1968" cannot be correct if he was born on August 7 or 8, 1966. In 1968 he was either one or two, not three. ] (]) 09:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
*'''Support''' I doubt I could word my thoughts any better than Jennavecia already has. When the cites interfere with readability, it's time to do some pruning. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 18:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:That ''Daily Beast'' source says "When he was three, his mother bought a World Book Encyclopedia from a door-to-door salesman..", so no year mentioned. I am unable to open the first source, ''The News Courier'', either original or archived, so can't see what it says. ] (]) 09:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
*'''Support''' although in some ways this puts the cart before the horse. The lead and body should be written in such a way that the lead does not need extensive citation. In other words, the lead should be a summary, not a synthesis. The reader should be able to infer the more delicate points from the body of the article, rather than being told what to think in the lead. '']'' 19:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::@] Returning to this, the other source says: "Doris Wales’ husband, Jimmy, wasn’t sure what she was thinking when she bought a World Book Encyclopedia set from a traveling salesman in 1968. Their first-born son, also named Jimmy, was not yet 3." So the cited sources disagree about whether he was 3 or not yet 3. ''''']''''' (]) 05:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== For posterity sake == |
|
== Jimbo == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sure we need to mention he’s username in the intro? Barely any sources mention it, and it isn’t a common name given to him. Cheers. ] (]) 16:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
on May 13, 2009: |
|
|
{{quotation|1=FWIW, the happens to be a list of Wikipedians. In this list, there's this entry: |
|
|
:<nowiki># ], a.k.a ], cofounder of Misplaced Pages and editor-in-chief of Nupedia</nowiki>}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Errrm, the article opens with: "{{tq|'''Jimmy Donal Wales''' (born August 7, 1966), also known on Misplaced Pages by the nickname '''Jimbo Wales'''...}}" So that's the 15th word in? ] (]) 16:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
The entry, dated January 22, 2002, also lists Jimmy Wales as "Jimbo Wales, the other cofounder of this great project". |
|
|
|
::What? That’s my point. It’s in the intro. Yet it’s a username without any real-life importance. (I mean that it’s not notable enough to be mentioned in the intro. It’s not a common name, it’s his username). Jimmy Wales has no special rights! Down with the dictatorship! ] (]) 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Sorry, I misunderstood your comment. I think it's been there for quite a long time. And I think it probably makes him more accessible, to editors and readers alike. I also can't imagine anything much less like ]. ] (]) 17:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::{{ping|Martinevans123}} Inform yourself better before making bold claims with no factual truth (see: ]). As to Jimbo Wales, you might think I’m a picky asshole, and I might think it myself, and it might be true, but clearly this goes against policies, or more generally the way biographies are written. This is just a guy who created an online encyclopedia, might be this one, who knows? That this guy is also coincidentally a user on Misplaced Pages should not be in the article, and definitely not in the intro. Cheers. ] (]) 17:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::What an wonderfully enlightening essay, full of "factual truth". Thank you so much for sharing that. And yes, what an amazing coincidence that is - an inventor occasionally using his own invention. Who knows, maybe that nice ] will be using ] before too long? ] (]) 17:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::: {{ping|Martinevans123}} This biography is like any other. The username Jimbo Wales, is not a common way of calling him, and is not described ''enough'' in the sources to be notable. ] (]) 17:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::And this is an article Talk page, like any other. So, as per ], we need to arrive at a consensus to remove that detail, instead of just edit warring? ] (]) 17:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::{{ping|Martinevans123}} Sorry. Then let’s discuss. Taking aside what I said before, I did genuinely want to discuss if his username, which is not really notable in any way, should be mentioned in his article. Considering that, yes, genuinely, this article is nothing special, and if Elon Musk was editing Misplaced Pages, his account would not be mentioned. In other words, stating that he edits Misplaced Pages under Jimbo Wales, provided there is a source, can be added, but having Jimbo Wales in the intro just seems a little bizarre. He is not commonly referred to as such, and the ] has nothing to do at the very top of an article. He is not commonly referred to as such, only in Misplaced Pages, and only by those who know he is there. ] (]) 18:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::Experience shows that no good comes from new editors popping in here and poking the bear. I know it's terribly unfair that Jimbo gets special treatment just because he founded Misplaced Pages but most of us have learned to live with it. See ] and ] for why rules that generally apply are not always applied if there is a good reason to do otherwise. ] (]) 00:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::{{ping|Johnuniq}} I get it. Again, sorry if it seemed that way. What I find frustrating is that what I said on my first message was serious, I genuinely want to discuss if we need to put his username in the Intro. It legitimately feels bizarre. It’s not a common name by which he is called, I also know that Misplaced Pages "rules" are just recommendations, and I also do not care that much about this intro. Cheers. ] (]) 01:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::]… This sums it up perfectly. I am legitimately asking if we can keep a not commonly known ''username'' of an online encyclopedia, as an alt/name of Jimmy Wales, in addition to making it sound professional by writing "is known on Misplaced Pages", instead of "known on Misplaced Pages by his username". And in fact, it makes this article a lot less professional, seriously, I’m not kidding. Cheers. ] (]) 01:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::, took about 20 seconds to find this one. ] (]) 01:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::Ok. I better shut up now shouldn’t I? Cheers, and happy new year. ] (]) 02:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::<small>Looking forward to Twitterpedia. Now that might well be a ]? But at least we'd get updates . ] (]) 10:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC) </small> |
|
|
For the next time this comes up, {{user|Encyclopédisme}} was CU indeffed and globally locked on 27 June 2024. ] (]) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Hatnote == |
|
For whatever reason, there is a glitch (unless I'm missing something, which is entirely possible) that puts the chronology of the revisions out of order. The first actually being '''December 25, 2001''' with edit. If your click to show previous edit, it jumps to September 20, 200''2''. Regardless, this last diff indicates that from December 25, 2001, Larry and Jimmy were listed as co-founders of Misplaced Pages. This did not change until , when Anthere cleared the list to ], now deleted. I have to go to work now, but I'll look into it a bit more. Regardless, more conclusive evidence from the early days. ]] 19:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{u|JLCop}} recently removed the hatnote. I reinstated it for now but I do think this subject is worth discussing, given that projectspace links within mainspace are generally discouraged. I noticed that ] also has a similar hatnote but that this is not the case for the average person listed at ]. Thoughts? ] ] 03:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
Upon further research, I found that the above remained in place until the page was soft-redirected to ] on '''November 27, 2006'''. Therefore, Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger were listed as co-founders of Misplaced Pages on the site's de facto user directory for one month short of '''five years'''. shows the last edit to display the above. ]] 22:18, 17 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: :( But seriously, as interesting and valuable to future historians as this is, I'm not sure there's a place for any of this in the article. The straw poll above was pretty conclusive on the co-founder issue. ] 00:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Well, the straw poll above establishes the positions of the respondents. The historical record establishes the objective truth (inasmuch as that concept is meaningful, I know, etc. etc.). Hopefully, these two ideas are identical, but my inclination is to go to great lengths with referencing because I know how easy it is to have a point dismissed <em>ad hominem</em> as partisan (POV-pusher). I wouldn't make a crusade of this reference, and I understand the counter-argument about overkill. But I also have a feeling we haven't seen the end of the PR campaign either. -- ] (]) 04:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Delete. ] (]) 00:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
::I just put this here for the next time the debate starts up, which hopefully won't be for a long time. ]] 05:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
*] which doesn't seem to have been closed or concluded (first item on the page). ] (]) 13:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
* I removed this before seeing this discussion. This is a clear case of ], as the edit notice itself says. I also removed the hatnote from ], for the same reason. ] ] 03:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:Fair enough. Given recent events, I think it's best to stay away from this article going forward just to be on the safe side. I appreciate the input from others in this discussion. ] ] 03:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== RfC using ] to link ] and ] == |
|
== A qualified thumbs-up from ''The London Review of Books'' == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I propose that we add something like this to the top of the article, as Jimbo has an information page other than user page, and there are many other mainspace articles related to Misplaced Pages that links to internal pages like this. |
|
{{bquote|Misplaced Pages still has its advantages, however. Despairing of discovering anything about Rand]] that I could make sense of, I looked up the article on Jimmy Wales, to see if that shed any light on his personal philosophy. This article is also long, but more reasonably so, given that Wales is responsible for one of the most significant inventions of the 21st century. It is also admirably even-handed, managing to convey that Wales is both something of a visionary and also something of a creep. The section on his personal life includes this detail, which neither he nor anyone else has seen fit to edit: ‘His first wife, Pam, was quoted in a September 2008 W magazine article as saying that Wales, because he believed altruism was evil, discouraged her from pursuing a nursing degree when they were married.’ The entry also details the break-up of Wales’s second marriage and the claims of a subsequent girlfriend, the Canadian conservative columnist Rachel Marsden, that she only discovered he was ending his relationship with her by reading about it on Misplaced Pages. I guess that’s ‘objectivism’ for you.|||{{cite journal |
|
|
|url=http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n10/runc01_.html |
|
|
|title=Like Boiling a Frog |
|
|
|journal=] |
|
|
|accessdate=May 21, 2009 |
|
|
|last=Runciman |
|
|
|first=David |
|
|
|date=May 28, 2009 |
|
|
}}}} |
|
|
] 02:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{For|the personal user page and related internal page|User:Jimbo Wales|WP:JIMBO}} |
|
== Admins unwilling/unable to deal with abusive edits by other admins? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was a ] on this, editors refused to link the user page in the article itself because it would constitute an exception, but the new proposal using a "for" template to link the user page does not constitute an exception per above. ] (]) 22:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
You might want to check out ] if you have a moment. ] (]) 01:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
* '''Oppose''' per the previous discussion, this is still a blaring ] violation. It shows internal strength to not let our guard down when writing about Misplaced Pages, and instead write the article in the exact same way we would about unrelated subjects. In no other context would it even be conceivable to link to someone's official website at the very top of the article rather than at the bottom in the "external links" section, so we must not do so here. ] ] 22:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
:This is an article talk page. You want ] ]] 01:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks - just realised that and posted there - I was trying to remove this section but we edit conflicted. That's what you get for editing while tired :) ] (]) 01:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
*:] only applies to ] and not ] though, and this is an internal link, not jimbowales.com which would belong at the bottom. ] (]) 00:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:: It's only a "internal link" because you're letting your guard down in exactly the way I said not to do. Please read the edit notice: "This article relates to Misplaced Pages itself. Please note that links to non-article namespaces should be treated as external links and not included in the body. Misplaced Pages is not a reliable source, so references to it must comply with WP:ABOUTSELF." ] ] 01:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:::That edit notice exists in other pages such as ], ], ], etc and still use hats containing internal links. Do you suggest to remove those hats? ] (]) 10:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*::::Pinging participants in ] @] @] @] |
|
|
*::::Pinging participants in ] @] @] @] |
|
|
*::::Let's see which is the consensus on this. ] (]) 21:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:::::<s>Whoever this Noel Body is, I just don't trust him.</s> Whatevs. ] (]) 22:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:::::Per the newly added COI section on my user page, I don't think I'm the best person to be commenting here. ] ] 22:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Oppose''' per Pppery, non-article namespaces are treated as external links in articles related to Misplaced Pages itself. Also, the fact that other pages also use these hats isn't a good argument, and I would suggest also removing them: someone searching for our project page ] most likely isn't going to type ]. ] (] · ]) 23:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Newer 2024 image? == |
|
== Co-founder dispute rumbles on and on (Revisionism) == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure whether or not it'd be right from me to change the infobox portrait myself, so I decided to ask y'all here. I propose that the current 2023 image (which has an admittedly distracting blurry background) is changed to a newer, fresher image from the 2024 Wikimania. Below are my proposals. I personally favor Option C. |
|
Editors are looking through my edits and now are engaging in revisionism across numerous articles. See here. ] (]) 04:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<gallery> |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales in New York City March 2023 blurred cropped.jpg|Current image |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x4 (1).jpg|A |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x4 (2).jpg|B |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x2 (3).jpg|C |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales 2024 portrait 3x2 (4).jpg|D |
|
|
</gallery> ]<sup>(])</sup> 21:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:I prefer the current image. It's better lit and less grainy than the other options provided. – ] (] <b>·</b> ]) 18:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:Here are a few new options, and I prefer option F 、 option G. |
|
|
<gallery> |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales visited the Youth Affairs Agency. Photo portrait 2024 (cropped).jpg|E |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales visited the Youth Affairs Agency. Photo portrait 2024 (cropped 2).jpg|F |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales visited the Youth Affairs Agency (cropped).jpg|G |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales welcome to Uzbekistan (cropped).jpg|H |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales in Uzbekistan (cropped).jpg|I |
|
|
File:Jimmy Wales and WikiStipendiya (cropped).jpg|J |
|
|
</gallery> ] (]) 12:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
There is a date/age issue in the second paragraph of the "Early life and education section". "When he was three, in 1968" cannot be correct if he was born on August 7 or 8, 1966. In 1968 he was either one or two, not three. Timothy Cooper (talk) 09:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Sure we need to mention he’s username in the intro? Barely any sources mention it, and it isn’t a common name given to him. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
I propose that we add something like this to the top of the article, as Jimbo has an information page other than user page, and there are many other mainspace articles related to Misplaced Pages that links to internal pages like this.
For the personal user page and related internal page, see Not sure whether or not it'd be right from me to change the infobox portrait myself, so I decided to ask y'all here. I propose that the current 2023 image (which has an admittedly distracting blurry background) is changed to a newer, fresher image from the 2024 Wikimania. Below are my proposals. I personally favor Option C.