Misplaced Pages

Talk:Republic of Ireland: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:23, 28 May 2009 editMooretwin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,613 edits Use of "Ireland" in the intro← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:24, 28 December 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,674,757 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with invalid parameters)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes}}
{{Outline of knowledge coverage|Republic of Ireland}}
{{Round in circles|search=no|topic=the article's title}}
{{IECOLL-talk}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{talkheader}}
{{Hiberno-English}}
{{WPB|1=
{{Article history
{{WikiProject Ireland|class=B|importance=top}}
|action1=GAN
{{WPCountries|class=B|importance=High}}
|action1date=12:02, 11 August 2010
{{WP IR|class=B|importance=top}}
|action1link=Talk:Republic of Ireland/GA1
{{V0.5|class=B|category=Geography}}
|action1result=not listed
|action1oldid=378342053

|currentstatus=FGAN
|topic=geography
|otd1date=2004-12-29|otd1oldid=16335536|otd2date=2005-12-29|otd2oldid=33182518|otd3date=2012-04-18|otd3oldid=487887885|otd4date=2013-04-18|otd4oldid=550895649|otd5date=2019-04-18|otd5oldid=893042316|otd6date=2020-04-18|otd6oldid=951408541
|otd7date=2022-04-18|otd7oldid=1083449318
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Ireland|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Celts|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Countries}}
{{WikiProject Irish republicanism|importance=top}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 21
|minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Republic of Ireland/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{Ireland naming discussions}}
{{calm talk}}
{{annual readership}}
{{To-do}}
{{old move|date=18 August 2024|destination=Ireland|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1242461520#Requested move 18 August 2024}}
{{OnThisDay|date1=2004-12-29|oldid1=16335536|date2=2005-12-29|oldid2=33182518}}
{{archives}}


{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=1|units=month|index=/Archive index}}
== The King of Ireland? ==
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index
|mask=/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}}
__TOC__


== Not the Republic of Ireland ==
Getting a completely solid source on this one might be difficult and the whole constitutional order 1937-1949 is shrouded in confusion, but the Treaty gave Ireland the same constitution status as Canada. At that time the head of state in Canada was the "King of Canada" and now the head of state is the "Queen of Canada". It stands to reason that the pre-1937 Irish head of state was the "King of Ireland". Whatever the position of the King post-1937, the title presumably remained until we became a Republic in 1949. — ] 23:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
:Yep, that's correct. --''']]''' 13:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
::Something very similar was discussed ] and Mooretwin did an excellent job in explaining the situation. --] (]) 13:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


The name of Ireland is simply Ireland and not the Republic of Ireland. One may refer to the official list of countries from the United Nations or to the websites of the government of Ireland which both indicate this ] (]) 16:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
ireland is famous for a four leafed clover. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 10:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Yes everyone knows. However it's a natural disambiguator since the island is also called Ireland. There are very few country articles on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official names. ] ] 17:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Just have "Ireland" become "Ireland (Island)" why would anybody be looking for the island of Ireland instead of the Ireland country when they search Ireland? ] (]) 21:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
:Its official description is "Republic of Ireland" which is used as ], see discussions at ]. In contrast "Republic of France" isn't common usage and the country is primary which is why we don't use the official description for France. ''']''' (]) 16:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
::Hi, well noted. However unlike the use of "Republic of France", "Ireland" is by the far the most common name used for the state in everyday use, both nationally (Ireland) and internationally (Europe, US and further a field). This is clearly demonstrated in the name of state in Misplaced Pages pages in other languages, for example Irish, German, French, and Dutch. There is little argument for the continued use of the "Republic of Ireland", it has no legal basis or no basis in everyday use. ] (]) 09:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
:::@]: How do you distinguish between the ], and the ]? You will see at ] which @] referred to above, that there have been several long discussions previously about this, but never a ] to change the articles' names. ] (]) 09:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
::::I know this has been discussed to death but surely putting the island to "Ireland (island)" and the country to "Ireland" would be the most accommodating arrangement? What are the cons? I think it makes sense that the country would take precedence over the geography (some examples I came up with: ] points to USA not the continent, ] points to the country not continent). ] (]) 20:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Why not the island as "Ireland" and the country to "Ireland (state)"? The island is likely the primary usage considering its existence throughout history and not just 100 and a bit years. ] ] 20:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::Age isn't the primary factor in which page should take precedence. Notice how America and Australia have existed as continents for millennia and yet the country takes precedence.
::::::You are making an assumption when you say the island is the primary usage. I checked the page statistics and while the island page is currently higher I reckon that's due to it currently being the primary as the patterns on both pages match up. This indicates to me that most views are expecting the country and clicking through to the country page rather than finding what they want on the island page (there is also the possibility of reading both pages).
::::::As an Irish person I find it somewhat demeaning that you insist the island is the main page and relegate the country to being the secondary topic and clearly others feel this way also whereas moving the island page is generally inoffensive. ] (]) 21:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Completely agree, that the country should take precedence over the island. More times than not when people refer to Ireland they are referring to the country not the island. As mentioned before this is not the case for Misplaced Pages in other languages, and the current setup in English is confusing to say the least. ] (]) 09:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::Do you have evidence for that that takes into account thousands of years of historical record before the country was formed? A huge proportion of the world doesn't actually realise there's a difference between Ireland the country and Ireland the island, and most overseas interactions with Ireland on a personal level are regarding the island historically and not the modern political state. As an Irish person I find it somewhat demeaning that people want to sweep aside the history of the island and say that it's only the modern state that is the important topic. ] ] 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Cannot see how this is sweeping aside history. The modern country of Ireland is very much connected with its history, the country was not created in a vacuum. Struggling to see what your reason is to not call the country by its official name, and the name in which most people globally use (aside from the UK potentially). ] (]) 11:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::You're treating Ireland differently to all other countries though, we should treat them in the same manner either referring first to the Geographical landmass or the Nation, in which case many links '''Australia''', '''Britain''', '''America''', '''South Africa''' and more would need to be changed to make this consistent. A large part of the reason people ''don't'' understand there's a difference is due to poor inconsistent sourcing like this where Ireland is often referred to as part of "The British Isles" or otherwise which leads people to not understand the Country is different to the Island and to the UK. Either way we should be keeping this consistent between all searches and countries. ] (]) 16:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
::::::By that moniker the countries listed would also need to be changed. ] (]) 16:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Hi, generally in Ireland and internationally both officially and informally when referring to the country "Ireland" is used and when referring to the island "Island of Ireland" is used. ] (]) 09:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Actually I meant "French Republic" but in any case although that may be the long official descriptive name I've never heard it used while I've always heard Ireland, the country called "Republic of Ireland" which specifically stated as being the official description. The French constitution doesn't appear to specify the country's long official descriptive name but more importantly is common usage. ''']''' (]) 18:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
::::There's a page on this at ] which is very detailed.
::::As you are British you will commonly be exposed to "Republic of Ireland" in usage as that's the name British law has chosen to use but for people living in Ireland and the rest of the world this is not the case. The name for the UN, EU, Council of Europe, IMF and OECD is "Ireland". The only place "Republic of Ireland" is used as a name is for the soccer team and also notably this Misplaced Pages page. Google for "Ireland" and "Republic of Ireland" and notice the difference in the results.
::::An "official description" is not a name, why are we supposed to use a description of the country as the title instead of its common and constitutional name?
::::Only Brits commonly use the "Republic of Ireland" due to Northern Ireland being a common part of their discourse (and need to disambiguate for politics, travel, business) but other countries internationally assume Ireland to be the country or don't have a need for disambiguation so often. Normally if people want to refer to NI they say NI, it's only in the UK that people would ever assume "Ireland" to mean "Northern Ireland" and thus need to disambiguate. ] (]) 20:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Hi, irish person here, I regularly use the term "Republic of Ireland". I find it useful to use the term to differentiate between the country & the island. ] (]) 18:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::Also, the constitution calls the country "The Republic of Ireland". ] (]) 18:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::It doesn't. Article 4 of Bunracht is pretty short and very clear.
:::::::"The name of the State is Éire, or, in the English language, Ireland." ] (]) 19:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
::::The description of the country is separate to the name of the country. As per Article 4 of the Constitution, the name of the country in English is "Ireland". "Republic of Ireland" has no official status as a name. ] (]) 09:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::And not a single person here thinks otherwise. ] ] 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::You are indeed correct. Just wanted to ensure there was no equivalence given between description and official name. ] (]) 11:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)


:::There is some reference on Wikipidia in the lineage of English and Scottish monarchy but I cannot recall the changes correctly in title, the dates or, being so many unconnected articles on the matter, can I find which articles those references are on (I have recoursed the English monarchy and nothing although lineage goes right back to the Celts). I reverted a change of King of Ireland but the main reason for my revert was a large and dubious edit(NPOV). It saddens me maybe that there be no provincial kings on the ] article, that this article provide the link to the ] rather than the island of ] and that the article ] give no link at all to the islands article. With so much editing over the years, hardly are these symptoms of leading a person in general to be well informed. There is a lot of accurate information but it's not all connected up at the minute. ~ ].].] 15:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


{{deindent}} Can I please ask those who are simply restating established facts, as if they are arguments, to realise that you're not going to "one and done" this discussion by doing so. It is acknowledged fact that Ireland is the name of the state (per the constitution). And that the Republic of Ireland is a description (per the Act). And that the island is also called Ireland (commonly and per the constitution). Etc. Simply restating these established facts (as a kind of "gotcha") is pointless. And does not address the issue that we cannot have two articles with the same title. Please argue your point on the basis of your proposal. And the relevant naming and disambiguation guidelines. For example, if you think that it should be "Ireland" and "Ireland (island)", then argue why the name of the state is (now) the ] (over the island). Or, if you think it should be "Ireland (state)" and "Ireland", then argue why a clunky/Wikipedia-only parenthetical disambiguator is preferred over the common, natural language and officially recognised descriptor. To the extent that ] should be overlooked. Stating things like "the state is called Ireland ", or "Republic of Ireland is a description not the official name ", is about as useful in progressing this discussion as quoting Pi to 10 decimal places. ] (]) 12:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)


:Well noted. I would argue for the use of Ireland / Ireland (Island) over Ireland (Country) / Ireland, as the former is the primary use of the term. This is demonstrated by a Google search where the majority of results relate to the country not the island. The term for the island has limited use, namely the geographical use for the island and organisations that cover Ireland and Northern Ireland such as the Irish rugby team. All other uses relate to the country. ] (]) 14:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
'''The King's title''' in the Irish Free State (1922-37) and in Ireland (1937-49) was exactly the same as it was elsewhere in the ], being
:Its the official description of the state, isn't that the point? When disambiguation is needed as it is on Misplaced Pages the description is appropriate but when it isn't such as when linking the country in the infobox of ] it is piped as "Ireland". Per ] if there is a term which is commonly used it can be used for natural disambiguation which seems appropriate here. ''']''' (]) 16:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
::We are talking about a name not a description. They should not be equated. Officially the state should never be referred to as the Republic Ireland, hence this element of the 1948 act is irrelevant to this discussion on the name. As suggested the terms Ireland and Ireland (Island) should be used instead, given Ireland the country is the primary use of the term and not the island. Furthermore this overcomes the confusion between both terms. ] (]) 18:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
:::I would like to support Tom's recommendation (new account but please don't hold that against me) that the primary use of "Ireland" should refer to the country rather than the island. I've noted the discussion at this location and elsewhere that not all states are referred to by their official name in their URL, however, I would suggest Ireland is unique in being the only country on Misplaced Pages where its name is shared with a geographic feature and the geographic feature takes precedence. By way of example, the primary topic for Belize, Jordan, Moldova, Niger, Paraguay, Chad and Guinea all refer to the states rather than the geographic features that share their name, i.e. Belize River, Jordan River, Moldova River, Niger River, Paraguay River, Lake Chad and Gulf of Guinea respectively. I would suggest Ireland the state should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland and the island of Ireland should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland (island) or https://en.wikipedia.org/Island of Ireland. Most people in Ireland and Northern Ireland would use the phrase "Island of Ireland" if needing to make the distinction between the state and the island but I appreciate the URL is a touch unwieldy so the bracketed (island) version may be more appropriate. Moreover, I think, as Tom mentions, generally, throughout the world, the use of Ireland refers to the state; that's not to say in some contexts people wouldn't use Ireland to refer to the island but it's most definitely in the minority. Consider the use of Paraguay; if the primary Misplaced Pages topic was about the Paraguay River and it said (paraphrasing) "oh, you're looking for the state, that's over here", I think it would be considered odd, confusing and inconsistent. Using Republic of Ireland for the topic on the state named Ireland seems incorrect and a touch anachronistic when a more sensible and consistent solution is available. ] (]) 01:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Rivers and lakes are not a good example as most if not all rivers and lakes on Misplaced Pages take the form "Lake X" or "River X" and don't run in to the same problem as this article, there was never an intention to name the page "Paraguay River" as just "Paraguay". This is why I used the continents examples (], ]) which would be referred to in a way that conflicts with the country. Most island states seem to have just one article for both country and island from what I can find (even ] where the island has occupied territory).
::::*] has an article for the island at ] but the state comes first.
::::*] is the state, geography is at ].
::::*] is the state, geography is at ].
::::*] is the state, geography is at ].
::::There is a counter-example where ] is the geographical group and the state is at ] but this has differing factors in that it is a collection of islands and "Micronesia" contains islands than the just state ] (]) 08:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::Noted on the rivers, lakes and gulfs @]. I suppose the point was to supplement other examples mentioned including your references to Australia and America and highlight that Ireland is perhaps the only topic which refers to a geographic feature in the primacy over a state of the same name. I agree that the country should be at Ireland and the island should be at Ireland (island). ] (]) 23:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
:::@] Misplaced Pages doesn't determine article titles based on what something should and should not be called officially, but what is commonly used and practical to an article's specific situation. That's the same reason that ] is still the main article for the country whose government would say you should only officially call it "Türkiye".
:::As others have said, Wikipedians did know how each term was in use when the decision for the status quo was reached. If it's to be changed, there would need to be something new or not previously discussed. ] (]) 16:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
::::As has been explained multiple times in the thread the current title is neither an official name or a common name which makes it different from examples like Turkey where Turkey is a common name for the country. To say this argument is the same as a "use official name" discussion is a misrepresentation. ] (]) 16:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
:I feel that 'Ireland (island)' is clunky whereas 'Republic of Ireland' is an elegant disambiguation. So I'm opposed to change. ] (]) 08:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::The discussion has moved on from the use of the Republic of Ireland as the name of the state, given this is not the official name and not the name in which most people refer to the country. The question is now which is the primary use of the term Ireland, the state or the island. From my viewpoint the answer is clearly the state. Any additional thoughts? ] (]) 10:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::::What references and evidence do you have that the state is the primary usage whenever people say Ireland? ] ] 11:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::Firstly if you look at Google Trends for searches globally over the last 5 years searches related to Ireland and country or state, are consistently higher than searches related to Ireland and island. Notwithstanding this, many of the top searches for Ireland and Island relate to River Island, Love Island or the islands of Ireland (such as Achill). Which can be further discounted from the searches related to Ireland and Island.
:::::Secondly, if you consider on a world or European stage, Ireland refers to the country not the island. For example: IMF, OECD, EU, European Council and UN. This is also reflected in non governmental organisations such as the International Energy Agency, European Broadcasting Union, World Medical Association, International Committee of the Red Cross, and the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies to name but a few. There are limited organisations that refer to the island like rugby and hockey.
:::::Therefore, the evidence is clear that Ireland primarily refers to the country not the island. If you believe otherwise please put forward the evidence. ] (]) 15:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::Sorry, ''what'' evidence would that be, exactly? You're just stating things, and claiming they're facts. They're not. If you're doing some sort of ] research, then share your links to your results. I'd love to see what search terms you're using that are bringing in "Love Island" and "River Island" as ''bona fide'' results for a search presumably using keywords along the lines of "Island of Ireland" or some variation thereof! ]<sup>]</sup> 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::I've yet to see any clear evidence that the island is the primary usage either, just it's longer history. Alas given the status quo, the burden of proof appears to fall on those wanting change.
:::::My position is that using disambiguating parentheses is preferential as the current situation simply perpetuates the fallacy that the name of the country is "Republic Of Ireland" (both on Misplaced Pages and other sites that source their data from the wiki, an often overlooked side effect).
:::::I'm sure long term editors are jaded by this topic arising every few months both here and historically at ], but I would ask this; if the names of the pages were to change, do you think there would be as much demand to revert to "Republic of" as there was to remove it? ] (]) 16:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
:::I'm aware that 'Republic of Ireland' is not the name of the state. It is, however, the name of the Misplaced Pages page and I don't support changing to either 'Ireland (island)' or 'Ireland (state)'. 'Republic of Ireland' is fine in my view. ] (]) 11:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::::That's a bit of a circular argument, this discussion is about the name of the Misplaced Pages page. If you feel the name of the page should be the Republic of Ireland, please put forward the reasons why. The evidence is pretty clear, globally Ireland is the name used both officially and colloquially by most organisations and people (see previous comments). The only exception to this is in the UK, in which Republic of Ireland is used frequently. That said the British Government officially refers to the country as Ireland not the Republic of Ireland.
::::Finally, I do think that wishes of the country regarding its naming should be respected. It's not a name that is disputed like North Macedonia. To disregard the correct and preferred name is insensitive. ] (]) 15:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::"The wishes of the country" is a bit of a stretch, Tom. There are ''very'' few countries on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official name. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::I think this argument that other countries aren't at their official names is flawed. In Ireland's case both the official and commonly used name are the same. All the examples people give are at the name people commonly use to refer to the country (], ], ], ], ] are the examples cited before) and are thus uncontroversial (I couldn't find any discussions trying to use the official names) but here we have a title that is both not the common or official name as the title. ] (]) 12:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::"To disregard the correct and preferred name is insensitive" "I do think that wishes of the country regarding its naming should be respected" I '''''am''''' irish, and I prefer the current name. So, you claiming that the wishes of the country are to be respected is just like a child on a playground saying "Call him stinkface, he told me to." ] (]) 18:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::Sorry, I didn't want to be mean, just that's the best thing I could come up with. ] (]) 10:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
:I'm also opposed to this change. Contrary to what is being said about primary topic, when I google "Ireland": https://www.google.com/search?q=ireland+-wikipedia, only six of the top twenty hits relate to the republic. The rest relate to all-Ireland, the island or Northern Ireland. ] (]) 15:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::This is anecdotal evidence, as your Google search is heavily influenced by your search history and location. My Google search returns much more website revering to the country not island. That's why I referenced Google Trends data in my previous comment. There are much more Google searches linked to the country/state than island globally over last 5 years (max time period). ] (]) 15:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
:::This is anecdote, Tom, as you haven't presented any evidence. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:::If your argument is that people looking for the state are getting lost, that's an argument for making 'Ireland' a disambiguation page like ] surely? Then they can choose the state or the island from there.
::::
:::But most of the arguments put forward seem more about emotion / nationhood which is not a good basis on which to make the change. ] (]) 15:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Apologies, if my previous comment was not clear. The Google Trends data relates to the number of search results not searches. There are more search results for Ireland that include country or state than island. I also mentioned most organisations globally refer to Ireland as the country not the island. It is incorrect to call these emotional arguments, if you have other evidence or arguments to contrary, please put them forward. ] (]) 16:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::Also anecdotally of course (from a stateless browser in Canada), excluding Misplaced Pages, the top results I receive for a Google search for are:
::- Tourism Ireland (ireland.com, all-island - weren't the Irish Times generous to give up this domain name!)
::- Failte Ireland (discoverireland.ie, Ireland)
::- Brittanica (britannica.com, Ireland)
::- Irish Government (gov.ie, Ireland)
::- Education in Ireland (educationinireland.com, Ireland)
::- Department of Foreign Affairs (ireland.ie, Ireland)
::- National Geographic Kids (kids.nationalgeographic.com, Ireland)
::- National Gallery of Ireland (nationalgallery.ie, Ireland)
::- Department of Foreign Affairs (dfa.ie, Ireland)
::- The Irish Times (irishtimes.com, Ireland)
::So, 9 out of 10 refer to the state rather than the island. Tourism Ireland is the only all-island result (again, for me, in Canada) in the top 10. Tourism Ireland is of course based in Ireland but promotes the entire island post Good Friday Agreement. Searches conducted from Ireland and the UK will likely not reflect what most of the world sees. ] (]) 23:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
:Contrary to what is being claimed here, google trends demonstrates more worldwide searches for the island rather than the country: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%201-d&q=%2Fm%2F03rt9,%2Fm%2F012wgb&hl=en-US. ] (]) 19:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::I don't think there's any information to be extracted from that page, its unclear exactly how they determine which is which. All the related queries for both refer to the country and the graph is almost the exact same as well, the difference is minor ] (]) 19:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::The link you shared does not fully work and the time period you searched is the past day. See below the link for worldwide results from 2004 to today for "Ireland Country + Ireland State" versus "Ireland Island''. Both Country and State are used as both are relevant words, the "+" acts as an or. As you can see Country/State is always higher than Island for the whole period since 2004. Additionally the top 3 results for Island relate to River Island so the island results can be discounted even further.
::https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?hl=en-GB&tz=-180&date=all&q=Ireland+island,Ireland+country+%2B+Ireland+state&sni=6 ] (]) 05:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:::That's a completely flawed methodology. You are ignoring that (I would imagine) for the vast majority of people putting "Ireland" into a search engine, we simply ''don't know'' whether they are looking for the state, or the island. The fact that "River Island" is a top result would suggest that Google Trends' results and algorithms have been as subject to enshittification as the rest of Google. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
::::I am afraid you don't understand how Google Trends data works. It shows how many results contain "Ireland" and "Island", in any order. This is not how many people searched these terms. The top results for these terms indicate the top searches that included terms "Ireland" and "Island" in search results. In this case the top 3 searches were related to retail chain River Island, which for this discussion whether "Ireland" primary usage is the island or the country is irrelevant. These results are made up of people searching for River Island (mostly likely in Ireland) and getting the terms Ireland and island included in their results. Hence based on Google search results there are much more results related to the country than the island. ] (]) 10:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::The top 5 searches for "Ireland country + Ireland state" relate to country code and Northern Ireland. That is no more relevant than River Island. The data and your claims about it are unconvincing. ] (]) 11:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::The top search is "country of Ireland", 3 of the other top 5 searches relate to country code which likely refers to the phone country code (+353), and 1 of the the top 5 results relate to NI. Hence the majority of the top 5 searches relating to "country" are relevant while the majority of the top 5 island searches are irrelevant (i.e. River Island). ] (]) 13:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
The articles are fine at their current respective homes. In my opinion, as a disambiguator is needed, the natural one is the state's official description. Most states on WP do not have articles at their official name - it's really no biggie. No offense is intended. The vast majority don't take any. (The decision to stop using ] may well have been premature...) ]<sup>]</sup> 09:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


:Please put forward evidence why you think the island is the primary use of the term Ireland, not the country. I have put forward evidence above based on Google Trends data and how the vast majority of organisations (in all fields: government, arts, medicine, charity etc) globally refer to the country not the island when they use the term Ireland. ] (]) 10:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
*From 1922–1927 - ''By the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and of the British Dominions beyond the Seas King, Defender of the Faith, Emperor of India''
:Please stop referring to the description as per the 1948 Act, you are misunderstanding its use. It should be never used as a name. ] (]) 10:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:: For the record: I would support ''''Ireland'''' for the country name and ''''Ireland (island)'''' for the geographical page. This brings it into line with usage elsewhere, as covered well enough above. I am concerned that Wiki is perpetuating the common misconception that 'Ireland' is the island. As a young Brit whose Dad served in the British Army in Belfast back in the Troubles, I recollect the passionate view at the time that the Republic should not be permitted to appropriate the formerly British-owned term, 'Ireland', and for a while it was Eire. I now feel that the colonial view of Ireland is carried on by Wiki these days and that we should all move on. The name of a country should be what its inhabitants say it is. There was a referendum, we Brits lost. Time we accepted that. ]]<small><sup><i>(])</i></sup></small> 10:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:::"the common misconception that 'Ireland' is the island." Um... Ireland ''is'' the island. It doesn't have another name. (And one day, the state will also share the same territory). ]<sup>]</sup> 12:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


::Please stop telling me what to do. I am misunderstanding nothing, including how Google Trends works. As I stated, your premise - "Ireland+island,Ireland+country+%2B+Ireland+state" - is flawed from the get-go. Now, we've both had our say. Let's not ] the process, and listen to some other opinions. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
*1927–1937 - ''By the Grace of God, of Great Britain, Ireland and the British Dominions beyond the Seas King, Defender of the Faith, Emperor of India''
:I agree @] that a disambiguator is needed but in my opinion, Ireland (island) is a better solution than using the description and not the common, and indeed official, name of the country, Ireland, when referencing the state. You state that most articles do not appear at their official name but almost none appear at their full description, e.g. there don't seem to be topics on "Federal Republic of Germany", "The Commonwealth of Australia", "The Kingdom of the Netherlands" or "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"; presumably because it's unwieldy and these states are not commonly known by their full descriptions. @] raises this point elsewhere that Ireland seems to be somewhat unique in that neither the common nor official name is in use. Referring to the state as Republic of Ireland is not incorrect but refusing to refer to the state as Ireland has deep political connotations, specifically, many UK governments refused to use the term Ireland until post-Good Friday Agreement some 40 years after the name was adopted and Sinn Féin still refuse to use the term, i.e. a refusal to refer to the state correctly as Ireland is particularly common, although not exclusively, amongst the more extreme political ideologies of the Irish left and the British right. ] (]) 18:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


{{Outdent|:}}How about modifying the first sentence to clarify the name per the article text:
The reason the King's title changed in 1927 was because the term "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland" had been superseded by the establishment of the Irish Free State and the renaming of the UK as the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". Rather than draw attention to the ], the Kings title simply referred to Great Britain and Ireland. This change did not mean the King adopted different Crowns in his different realms - That development was did not formally occur until 1953 (see also other British monarch articles regarding styles and titles). '''The King's title in the Irish Free State/Ireland was never simply "King of Ireland".''' (nor was the King incidentally simply King of Canada during those periods - these separate styles weree later developments). Regards. ] (]) 06:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
::Some commentators attribute the "comma" in the latter title (Great Britain, Ireland) to mean that separate crowns were reinstated. It's difficult to find good sources for this stuff. BTW, what was the title from 1937-1949? --] (]) 00:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
:::Some commentators have lots of theories. I prefer facts. The comma in no way severed the Crown. Plenty of sources on that too. Regards. ] (]) 04:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


{{Quotebox|text=
== NATO ==
'''Ireland''' (English) and {{langx|ga|''']'''}} {{IPA-ga|ˈeːɾʲə||Eire_pronunciation.ogg}} are the official names of the country also officially described as '''Republic of Ireland''' ({{lang|ga|Poblacht na hÉireann}}),<!--{{Efn|name=nomenclature}}-->, a country in north-western Europe...}}


Best wishes, ] (]) 14:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
What support is there for the statement that Ireland's neutrality is the reason that Ireland is not a member of NATO??
] (]) 03:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


== Requested move 18 August 2024 ==
:I'm not an expert but I always thought that it why that is the case. Reading the ] page now it is clear not joining NATO is due to Ireland's neutrality and no other political reason.] (]) 10:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #efe); color: var(--color-base, #000); margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);"><!-- Template:RM top -->
::What section of the ] page makes it clear not joining NATO is due to Ireland's neutrality and no other political reason?] (]) 20:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color: var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''


::: It also goes back to Irish neutrality during WWII and there are multiple references to NATO in the ] article --] (]) 23:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC) The result of the move request was: '''not moved.''' There is a clear consensus against moving. <small>(])</small> ] (]) 14:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
----


] → {{no redirect|Ireland}} – This is technically a request for two moves: ] to ] and merging the current ] article into ] (or temporarily moving it to ]). I'm uncertain if this discussion would be better suited to a broader project talk page, which is why I'm making this proposal here. I am aware of ], that decided to leave the articles on their current titles, but that was simply 15 years ago and there are good reasons for both moving and keeping. However, from what I can see, the reasons to move both articles seem to be predominant. Given the frequency of discussions, it is clear that many editors have made significant efforts on ] to move this article, challenging the incorrect assumption by some editors that there is no reason to believe consensus could have changed over the past decade and a half.
:::: During WWII NATO did not exist so we can discount that. As regards the ] article I still do not see how it makes clear not joining NATO is due to Ireland's neutrality. It does however mention one of the reasons I remember being told at school which is that Ireland would not join NATO (or any other military alliance of which Britan was a member) while Britain still controlled Northern Ireland. And if this article is correct then the fact that Ireland was willing to enter an alliance with the USA and has joined the Nordic Battlegroup would indicate that Irish Neutrality is not the reasson. Another reason I remember was/is a clause in NATO that a country with a border dispute could not join until that dispute was resolved which would prevent membership by Ireland until at least the changes to the constitution post the Good Friday agreement of 1998. (This might also have something to do with why it was not until 1999 that Ireland joined NATO-led Partnership for Peace). Of course the next question is can anybody say that Ireland was ever asked to join? NATO membership is after all by invation only. Either way the real reason this topic has started at all is the fact that Ireland's non membership is mentioned in the Lead of this page. Is this necessary here? How does it enhance the article? Should we attend to the pages of Sweden, Switzerland, North Korea etc. and state in the Lead of those pages their reasons for not joining NATO and specifying any involvement they may have with UN peace keeping? Sorry if this is a bit long winded!!] (]) 01:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


"Republic of Ireland" is neither an official term nor is it ], except in Ireland itself and , thus eliminating it as an option. . the official English name of the country is, as pointed out by other editors, simply "Ireland". On Misplaced Pages, we either use the short forms for countries (], ], ], or ]) or we use the official name if it is already a single and concise term (], ], ], ]). It is clear that this situation falls into the latter category, which also aligns with ].
:::::. ] (]) 01:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


To avoid the use of parentheses, as seen in ], we need to move the article about the island. Taking a glimpse at other island countries like ] or ], which also occupy their respective short forms, it appears that "Geography of ..." is the established form to describe the underlying island on which the country is located (], ]). Since ] redundantly addresses the politics of its constituent countries—topics that are already covered in their respective articles—I suggest merging it with ] by removing all sections that go beyond the island of Ireland as their subject matter and incorporating all remaining subtopics, such as geological history, into the article ]. Any disambiguation pages don't have to be changed. –] (]) 13:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::http://www.nato.int/issues/nato-ireland/index.html would seem to indicate that relations with NATO are not all bad. It looks like Irish/NATO troops were together in Bosnia and Herzegovina as far back as 1997 even if it was as a part of the UN multinational stability force SFOR see http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0476/D.0476.199703190040.html Anyway does anybody have any objection if I remove the (unneccessary) NATO text from the Lead?] (]) 02:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
::::::It frequently comes as a surprise to nationals of NATO countries that Ireland is not a member. It is a significant foreign policy issue and I don't see any pressing need for its removal from the lead. ] (]) 02:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Well I must say that I am suprised at that statement. I have lived in/worked in/visited England, mainland Europe, Africa, North America and Aisia. I have met many people from all those areas as well as from Australasia and South America. I have met people from most of the NATO states. I have been asked many things about Ireland, everything from 'are there really forty shades of green' to questions about The Troubles and even (in England) one night for an explaination of WWII neutrality. BUT I can safely say that no one has ever expressed to me their surprise that Ireland is not a full member of NATO. But if it is such an important aspect of Ireland as to have to appear in the fourth paragraph about the country we better make sure that the reason stated for not being a member is correct in case any potential military allies are using Misplaced Pages to see if we might join up! So again can anybody provide a source to verify that non membership is because of Irish Neutrality. I have sent email to NATO for confirmation that Ireland was formally invited to join. Obviously if that is not forthcoming we will be able to change the statement to 'Ireland is not a full member of NATO simply because it was never invited to join'!!! (go on smile)] (]) 04:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Back again like a dog wit a bone!! How about replacing the non membership statement with
::::::::Since 1999, Ireland has been a member of NATO's ] program.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/1999/1129/99112900010.html |title=State joins Partnership for Peace on Budget day |author=Patrick Smyth |date=29 November 1999 |work=The Irish Times |accessdate=2008-05-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nato.int/pfp/sig-cntr.htm |title=Signatures of Partnership for Peace Framework Document |work=NATO website |date=21 April 2008 |accessdate=2008-05-06}}</ref>
:::::::which I robbed from the Military section. Also does anybody mind if I mention Nordic Battlegroup membership in the military section.] (]) 05:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


*Note that there have been at least 25 discussions of the title since the poll linked above, so although many were closed early, the question has been revisited many times in the last 15 years. Most of the move discussion outcomes are compiled at ]. ]<small>]</small> 13:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Surely it goes back to the cold war when Ireland like Austria was a stated non aligned/neutral country ] (]) 06:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
* There is no need to go back 15 years to find a discussion, there is one still on this page above. ] (]) 13:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:Does that mean that a similar statement should be placed in the Austria lead? I can switch over there and put it in if you like especialy as Austria has German neighbours and are close to Russia (well closer than Ireland anyway) because according to the first NATO Secretary General, Lord Ismay,
*:I know, from what I can tell, the 2009 discussion was the initial talk about this topic. –] (]) 14:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
::the organization's goal was "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down".
*::That 2009 discussion was the result of the previous dozen move discussions that resulted in ] in 2008. ]<small>]</small> 14:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:Realy I don't think is should be in the Austrian lead any more than it should be in the Ireland or Sweden Lead. But if it must be in the Ireland lead we should at least be truthful about why Ireland is not a full member and that is not because of Irish Neutrality.] (]) 07:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
::Scholarship on Ireland's non-participation in NATO is thin on the ground, but if you can access JSTOR, , by Elizabeth Keane, 2004, might answer some of your questions. Eunan O'Halpín, Dermot Keogh and Michael Kennedy have also occasionally touched on it.] (]) 13:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
:::If you look at the abstract:
::::This article explores Ireland's participation in the Council of Europe following the repeal of the External Relations Act and departure from the British Commonwealth. It suggests that Ireland played a more significant role in international relations than is often acknowledged and contrasts the government's participation in Europeanbased organisations with its refusal to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). It examines why Ireland, under the guidance of Sean MacBride as minister for external affairs, enthusiastically embraced the opportunity to take part in the Council of Europe, the Organisation for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC), and the United Nations, but not in NATO. Partition, and not particular concerns for the preservation of Ireland's neutrality, motivated the government's stance on NATO membership. Though the fixation with partition remained, participation in multilateral organisations nonetheless marked the beginning of an expanding role for Ireland in international affairs.
:::So now do we have enough proof that neutrality is not the reason why Ireland is not a full member of NATO. Can I go ahead and make the changes? Any objections?] (]) 13:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
::::The above does not constitute 'proof', its an interpretation. If you mean to modify the NATO ref. in the lead, so long as it is sufficiently ref'd, then fine. But I don't think it should be removed. On the point you raised as to whether Ireland was invited to join there is the following :
<blockquote>
On 7 January 1949 the United States informally approached the Irish government through its embassy in Washington about issuing an official invitation to consider being a NATO founding member. The United States was still resentful about Irish wartime neutrality, but, as with the Marshall Plan, Ireland's strategic location and close connections to Britain meant that it could not be completely ignored. A CIA report determined that Irish participation would be useful....<br />
A note from Ernest Bevin to the State Department the day before Ireland received the official invitation warned that 'if the Irish raised partition as a barrier to joining the pact' the response should be that it was 'beyond their competence' to discuss the issue.92 The State Department was not as anxious to secure Ireland's membership as MacBride thought, and the American government's response to the aide-mimoire was that the partition issue was 'entirely the concern of the governments of Ireland and the UK' and that the situation was not relevant to membership of NATO.93
</blockquote>
'''At this time''', it would appear that Irish Gov. strategy was to trade NATO membership for unification. It can't simply be extrapolated that the reason Ireland has not since joined remains the same. ] (]) 14:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


:I agree with this suggestion for the most part. My only addition would be that some content might also have to be moved to ] ] (]) 14:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
: I dont like the wording, its like saying the USSR did not join NATO because it was on the opposing side, i dont see why a country thats not part of NATO really needs it in their introduction. How about its reworded to something like..
: "Ireland is a member of the EU, the OECD, and the UN. It has maintained a policy of neutrality since independence, although it does contribute to peacekeeping missions sanctioned by the UN." ] (]) 14:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC) ::That is a good point, not all information are suitable for just the geography. ] (]) 15:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
* What evidence is there that the country of Ireland, a state that has existed for just over 100 years and doesn't occupy all of the island, is the primary subject here instead of the island? Why can't the country be at Ireland (country) and leave the island at Ireland? Is there evidence that when people say Ireland they're genuinely talking about the country and not the island and what exists in it, and not mixing the two up as is very commonplace? ] ] 15:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
::Yes. At least that is better than an unproven statement about NATO. If we have to start listing all the associations that countries are NOT a member of in the Leads these pages will get very boring] (]) 14:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
:::No-one is asking anyone to list reasons. Ireland's non-membership is not a trivial matter and is sufficiently important to be mentioned in the lead. ] (]) 14:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC) *:This is a good counterproposal, and I '''support this as Option B'''. ] (]) 16:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
*:There is no hard evidence because we don't have access to all statistics, but there are indicators. For example, let's consider the average monthly page views of countries versus their respective islands in the cases of Taiwan and Cyprus according to the page view statistics: ] (~ 420.000 views) vs ] (~ 13.000 views) and ] (~ 230.000 views) and ] (~ 10.000 views). This suggests that states are far more searched for than the islands they occupy and I don't see a reason why this should be different for Ireland. In ] (~ 260.000 views) and ] (~ 200.000 views), Ireland's views are overall slightly higher than those of the Republic of Ireland.
::::So how about
*:Since we don't have access to referral sources, we can't say anything for sure, but given the numbers, we can assume that a vast majority of the Republic of Ireland's views originate from the disambiguation hatnote on the Ireland page. People likely enter "Ireland" in the search bar as for "Republic of Ireland", are directed to the article about the island, realise the article isn't about the state, and then click on the link in the lead to reach the country’s page. This would fit the difference of around 60.000 views with most likely a few visitors that closed the tab after reaching the article of the island.
::::"Ireland is a member of the EU, the OECD, and the UN. It is not a member of NATO or the Warsaw Pact, but it does contribute to peacekeeping missions sanctioned by the UN."] (]) 15:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
*:Given the lack of complete clarity, I would suggest aligning this case with similar topics like those mentioned earlier: ] or ] as well as ] or ]. These all follow the pattern where the state is the main article, with an article about the island under "Geography of...".
:::::Drop ref. to ], a redundant org., and fine by me. ] (]) 15:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::: That would be better than the current version, agreed theres no need for the warsaw pact. ] (]) 15:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC) *:I don't entirely disagree with your suggestion to move it to ], but I think the parentheses can be avoided here, and it would be better to do so if possible. ] (]) 18:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
*::That is just ] and as we all know, Misplaced Pages cannot be used as a reference and that includes page hits. It's pure supposition that that's what's happening. ] ] 22:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Change made. Rashers point me to where you got 'On 7 January 1949 the United States informally approached the Irish government..'--] (]) 17:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
*:::OR requires unproven page content and does not include page hits as a statistical and automated process to be recorded, regardless of the source. The numbers from Misplaced Pages align with external search and book statistics, making it unlikely for the hypothesis to be completely incorrect. However, since we are discussing an assumption, I have written a few other paragraphs in case you did not notice. –] (]) 06:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Its pg 179 of Keane's paper that I ref'd above. ] (]) 17:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per ], ] (including ]) and per ] (which I wrote years ago, in terms of the merger of the island article). As has previously been discussed "Republic of Ireland" is an official description and is in common usage unlike say ]. Georgia isn't comparable becauase the long name may not be official or at least isn't common usage, see ]. Cyprus and Taiwan aren't comparable as in those cases the countries cover similar areas to the islands which isn't the case for Ireland where Northern Ireland covers a significant amount of the area and population. ''']''' (]) 17:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Thanks] (]) 18:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
*:Oh, ] isn't only comparable, but rather nearly the identical issue, a country without a long official form, only difference is that there is no made-up name that is used as an article title and there is a U.S. state with the same name. ] you mentioned supports my point, I'm just wondering why you think that this is any different than in this case. The idea of moving Georgia to a made-up name was vastly rejected. Here, we got the identical situation in reverse, with a made-up name already applied and my idea is to move it back to it's real, official, and more common name. I opened the discussion with those very guidelines you mentioned. ] requires a name that is not made-up, "Republic of Ireland" is a made-up name as it isn't broadly accepted (remember, globally, not only within the UK and Ireland) and not the official name either if we stick to the UN, which is probably the best way to determine, whether a term for a state is official or not. In this case, it is definitly not official unless you can not offer clear evidence for the claim that it is. ] contradicts your reasoning as well; "Ireland" is way more common than "Republic of Ireland", throughout the article as well as , and by "way more", I mean more than fifty times as much.
::::::::Did the Irish Free State always have a neutral policy...I do not think so....I think the idea that neutrality was Irish policy from independence is not accurate....I suggested that the ] article be deleted because it is of such a poor standard...I admit I have not worked on it myself. Regards. ] (]) 16:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
*:When you say that Cyprus isn't comparable, I just got one question for you: have you ever looked at a map of Cyprus showing the area of Northern Cyprus? This is exactly the same, we got two different states on one island; "Northern (island name)" on one hand and just "(island name)" on the other. Otherwise, I don't understand why this should be different; maybe you can explain this idea a little further? –] (]) 18:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::You've got a point. It would be hard to reconcile any effective notion of neutrality with Art. 7( b ) of the Free State constitution:
*::Except that Republic of Ireland is not a made up name, it's in fact an official descriptor of the country. The constitution of the country gave us a natural disambiguator. And Republic of Ireland is indeed used, just ask the football team. And it's in use by the government of Ireland as a simple search across the government websites shows. It's not some made up term that is only used by the British or some such. ] ] 22:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
<blockquote>
*:::Need I remind you that it was FIFA that imposed that name on the Football Association of Ireland team in 1953? ] (]) 07:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
In time of war or of strained relations with a Foreign Power such harbour and other facilities as the British Government may require for the purpose of such defence as aforesaid (would be made available).
*::::You needn't, because we're not talking about the football team, we're talking about the island, and the state, which our government said could be officially described as 'the Republic of Ireland', in the Republic of Ireland Act, 1948. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
</blockquote>
*:::Are you really asking me to consult the local football team while simultaneously claiming, without any statistical indicator, that it was common outside the UK and Ireland? –] (]) 07:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
*:"Republic of Ireland" is not tue common name. Globally "Ireland" is the common name for the country. ] (]) 18:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' for the reasons I have stated ]: in brief summary, the ''status quo'' works because 1) "Optimising for readers over editors" precludes use of artificial construct disambiguators such as Ireland (state), Ireland (island). 2) The ''island'' of Ireland is known as - well, "Ireland". In the English language, it does not have '''any''' alternative common name or description. ] can therefore be claimed by the article on the island. 3) Using "Republic of Ireland" for the state doesn't allow the state to reside at a page called by its official name - but so what? ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]. 4) Not only has there never been a ] to move ] to ], there is demonstrable consensus to '''retain''' the ''status quo''. That's visible in the many, many polls taken prior to the 2009 poll, ''and'' in the ones since. My country's article isn't at its official name? So what. There are ] on Misplaced Pages. Only 30 of them are at their official name. The ''status quo'' '''works'''. Tobias is, with the best will in the world, proposing a whole heap of work, for many editors, that ultimately doesn't benefit the reader. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
*:Not really a consensus, just more seasoned editors shoot it down each time. Just because it's the status quo doesn't make it correct, otherwise this topic wouldn't get restarted monthly.] (]) 19:26, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
*::Yes, a consensus, really. Click on the link in my post. Scroll down a bit. Read the poll results. I've done that work, you can do the rest - all the ones since, up until last year, should be on the ] talk page. It's absolutely ''not'' "just more seasoned editors shooting it down each time." It is, quite often, more seasoned editors saying "Here's why the ''status quo'' works, but sure, consensus can change, do you have any new arguments?" - and there aren't any. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::Oh, I've read it all. And I've seen that "consensus can change" line many time. ] (]) 20:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
*:Since I already answered most of this points in this discussion, I'll keep it short: short forms are no official names, but no made-up names either, so absolutely valid to use in terms of concision - "Republic of Ireland" is neither concise nor legally existing at all.
*:There is a alternative to "Ireland", actually two: "Ireland (island)" and "Geography of Ireland". Both of them are common on WP with the latter option being predominantly used. –] (]) 20:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
*::Wait, what now? 'Republic of Ireland {{tpq|is neither concise nor legally existing at all.}}', where's that coming from? I refer you to the Republic of Ireland Act. 'Republic of Ireland' is the official, legal description of the state. Which you would know if you'd read the articles in question, or the previous move debates. As a relatively inexperienced editor, editing outside your normal areas of interest, I'd suggest doing your research before making proposals from a position of ignorance, especially in controversial areas. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::What don't you understand about the difference between an official description and an official name? We're not seeking a description of the state's cultural or political identity, but rather an internationally recognised official term that aligns with UN records. According to them, this is not the official name and therefore , regardless of the country declaring it its official description. And before you want to use that as an argument: yes, the UN also acknowledge short forms like "" instead of "Republic of Poland", this is no deviation of an official form. –] (]) 07:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
*::::Let me express this in words of no more than <strike>two</strike>three syllables. We passed a law that states the country's official description. '''That makes it legal.''' A UN style guide doesn't negate or override that. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::::That still doesn't make a description a name. –] (]) 14:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
*::But ] isn't about the geography of the island. The section on the union with Britain is longer than the entire geography section. ] (]) 08:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::It is about the physical island, not a state on it. That's why economy, culture, and politics are misplaced here—they belong in the articles of the respective states, meaning this article and ]. –] (]) 13:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''' - "Republic of Ireland" ''is'' an official term, while it is not the name of the state, it is the "official description" of the state. That being said, we don't use official names here simply because they're official. Merging the existing ] article into ] is simply a non-starter as there is far more content in the former article than just about the island's geography. To have the country at the basename it would have to be the ], which is impossible to prove considering we have no way of determining whether searches for ] are for the country or the whole island. And yes, therein I could see an argument for a ] with the basename as a dab and the two articles existing as ]/Republic of Ireland and ], but the whole island has the long-term significance (PT2) by default imo, and unless PT1 can be proven to favor the country, I see no reason to change the existing arrangement. ] (]) ] 02:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
::There is a method to evaluate ], switch to a disambiguation page for a set period of time, after which the traffic to each can be evaluated to determine which topic readers are actually looking for. ] (]) 07:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''' long term significance goes to the island itself. The ] has just as much a claim to primacy, if not a greater one, than the modern Irish republic. ] (]) 05:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''' The current arrangement is sensible. The name "Republic of Ireland" is well-known and frequently used to distinguish the country from the broader island. ] (]) 06:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
:'''Comment''' I couldn't help notice that the proposer recently flagged what they identified as problems on another article, and when asked to help with the cleanup they proposed, they responded with {{tpq|Great to hear that. I would love to help, but I currently don't have the time or motivation to rewrite the entire page.}} 🙄 ]<sup>]</sup> 10:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
::Congratulations, and ... what now? That has absolutely nothing to do with this and maintenance hatnotes exist to point out specific flaws until they are addressed, they to not obligate the flagger to participate in the correction, if that is what you're trying to say. –] (]) 05:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. While the country is indeed commonly known as Ireland, it is not primary over the island. And it is also very commonly known as the Republic of Ireland or simply "the Republic", so the current title is very good natural disambiguation. -- ] (]) 10:39, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
:'''Oppose:''' Oh no, not again! Oppose per previously reasons I've given in several other discussions as well as all the reasons given by other editors above, so there is no need to repeat them all here. Moving this to ] is just not thinking what that article is actually about. This is a dead topic, just leave it be, it works as it is. ] (]) 10:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''': I think the current title is appropriate. It's widely recognized and easily understood. ]] 14:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''': Would introduce needless confusion and become factually incorrect. ] (]) 14:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
*:@] How would it be "factually incorrect"? ] (]) 16:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
*::Must confess to being curious about that one myself. ] ] 19:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::Because legally there the Island of Ireland consisting of the Republic of Ireland and the North of Ireland. ] (]) 23:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
*::::"North of Ireland"? That's a very creative one, I have to admit. Unfortunately for you, they are legally known as "Ireland" and "Northern Ireland". –] (]) 05:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per above, plus if this were to occur, we would have to say "Northern Ireland is not part of Ireland". The republic currently doesn't cover the entire island of the same name, and the island has long-term significance. The current arrangement is probably the best alternative option for the two "Ireland" subjects until political events change the situation. ''']]''' 14:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose move and ] close.''' This has been discussed to death. ''']'''&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 20:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' It appears that it is ]. But in my opinion, such a move would only cause confusion. The current set up works because it helps distinguish between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland and the island itself is covered separately. And I'm also of the opinion that we should maintain the status quo when things are working. <span style="font:'Pristina'">]</span><span style="font:'Pristina'"><sup>]</sup></span> 11:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
*:What leads you to assume that this would only cause confusion in the case of a move? I understand your reasoning, but we don't have templates like ] or ] here on WP just to decorate our body text. –] (]) 12:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' No reason to change, and lots of reasons not to change at this point. If I say my ancestors came from ], but they arrived in the 1800s, current naming is correct. --] (]) 17:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
*:Even after a possible move, it will not be any less correct. The island remains the island, no matter what the title of the article is. –] (]) 18:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC)


*'''Merge ] into ]'''. The proposed move doesn't really work because the ] article is about much more than geography- it's also about the culture and the nation in general- but thinking about it, there are issues with the current status quo. ] and ] are largely duplicates for instance; if people seeking information about the government as well as general culture of Ireland come across this article or the other one, the information will inevitably be split. The scope of ] also isn't clear- the article currently starts with "Ireland is an island" but the article clearly covers the whole of the 32 counties, including small offshore islands. I don't think it's impossible to combine the articles in an easily-understandable way, whilst being clear that the sovereign state does not have sovereignty over the whole of Ireland. ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 22:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
It also raises the question of when did the state actually achieve independence?] (]) 16:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
*:Strong disagree. There's a clear distinction between the island that has been populated for millennia and the modern country that has only existed since 1922. It's also perfectly common for there to be some duplication of information across articles about related topics. Besides, equating the Republic of Ireland with the island of Ireland would be walking into a political minefield. ] (]) 05:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
:Art. 7( b ) of the Free State constitution no longer applies as it is now the 1937 constitution of Ireland tha applies. How you define Independence has to be decided before you can say when it was achieved. Was a dominion of the British Commonwealth independant? Was it only when the british king was removed as head of state? Has it yet to happen while partition exists? As regards Irish Neutrality it probably deserves an artticle because it does not match what most people in the world would mean by being neutral but has an unique Irish flavor which seems to be that Ireland will not join any military alliance which includes britan while Ireland is partitioned. So Ireland is neutral only if britan is involved but if it's Sweden, Finland, Norway and Estonia it's ok. Of course the whole concept of neutrality sometimes seems to have a new meaning in britan also where it appears to be used to mean not a member of NATO] (]) 15:52, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
*::No one is suggesting equating the country of Ireland with the island of Ireland, just using it's official and ] for the countries article.
::The issue being addressed was neutrality from 1922. Since the Irish Free State constitution could be, and frequently was, changed simply by an act of the Oireachtas, the question is probably moot. ] (]) 19:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
*::@] makes a point others have made before, the ] article is nebulous and isn't distinct. The content of the article is not limited in scope to the island of Ireland but rather the nation as an abstract concept, covering it's geography, history & politics etc. ] (]) 09:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::But you can talk about the geography, history, and politics of the whole island in a way distinct from those of the Republic of Ireland specifically. Besides, "Republic of Ireland" ''is'' a common name and an official one under the Republic of Ireland Act 1948. ] (]) 11:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*::::No, it is not an official name, just an official description, and it is not commonly used outside of the British Isles. The history of Ireland inevitably overlaps with the history of this article, as does its politics and demographics, since the country occupies the majority of the island's area. Everything else is included in ]. –] (]) 11:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::::"it is not an official name, just an official description" That sounds like a distinction without a difference.
*:::::"it is not commonly used outside of the British Isles" Yes it is. I live outside the British Isles, and I use it.
*:::::] (]) 11:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*::::::There is a difference between a personal experience and a . clearly show only a small peak in frequency within the British Isles, primarily in Ireland itself, with no indication of common usage outside Britain whatsoever. The difference between an official name and a description is that an official name is internationally accepted and recorded in UN files. A description is nothing more than a national designation used to display the form of government or cultural identity and has no international significance at all. –] (]) 12:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::::::Those data actually show usage of the term "Republic of Ireland" outside the British Isles. They support my position, not yours. The rest of your comment is hair-splitting. The fact remains that Dublin itself has endorsed the term "Republic of Ireland" in Irish legislation. ] (]) 12:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*::::::::No, 'Republic of Ireland' remains unofficial as a name, according to the UN and the Irish constitution, and is uncommon as we clarified several times above. Of course, every term is used everywhere at some point, even Russian in Spain, but the usage outside the British islands is absolutely insignificant in comparison. You're just trying to distort clear facts to fit your opinion. –] (]) 12:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::::::::You keep repeating this, and you continue to be wrong. As previously pointed out to you, the Republic of Ireland Act of 1948, passed by the Oireachtas and signed into law, designates "Republic of Ireland as the official description of the state. What the UN says in a style guide is neither here nor there. Please desist from continuing to spread misinformation. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::::::::: of the Constitution of Ireland couldn't be clearer, the name of the country, in English, is "Ireland". That's an indisputable fact.
*::::::::::If anyone is spreading misinformation it's Misplaced Pages, as by maintaining the status quo it perpetuates fallacy that the name of the country is the "Republic of Ireland".
*::::::::::This debate does not exist anywhere else as every country, official body (except for FIFA) and reference work accepts that the name of the country is "Ireland". ] (]) 15:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::::::::::I don't really see anyone making the claim that Republic of Ireland is actually the official name (or a name) of the country, only that it's the official description and is therefore a useful natural disambiguator for uses of the word Ireland. We all know the name of the country in English is Ireland, that's not in dispute. However, as has been shown, even the Irish government uses the term Republic of Ireland in documentation etc. to refer to the country when a disambiguator is required while also talking about the island of Ireland. When the government of the country in question sometimes uses the term for such purposes, who are we to argue against that? People seem to operate under the clearly false impression that the term isn't used inside the country, when it is. ] ] 15:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*::::::::::::100% agree, the name of "Ireland" and description as "Republic of Ireland" are facts of law and shouldn't be up for debate. (Despite a number of contributions to the contrary)
*::::::::::::I'll maintain a description is not a name, but more importantly I have yet to find another other reference work or list of countries maintained by an official body (except for FIFA) that use the prefix "Republic of". Misplaced Pages is the outlier. The overwhelming evidence shows that "Ireland" is the ] used the world over, while opposition to moving the article is based on reluctance change and ... vibes. ] (]) 15:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*::::"Republic Of Ireland" is the common name of the soccer team, "Ireland" is the common name of the country, island and Kim Basinger's daughter.
*::::The name of the country is very clear, it is literally of the constitution and is the accepted common name by every international organisation (UN, EU, World Bank, UK Government). Alongside Misplaced Pages, the BBC is one of the few sources that commonly doesn't use the official name due to their . ] (]) 11:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*:::::It's obvious that we're going in circles here, so I'm just going to note that this proposal has yielded a clear majority in favour of the status quo. ] (]) 12:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. The discussion here keeps revolving around official name, but that is not the reason for the current article title or a valid reason to change it. ] (]) 15:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Moral support'''. This is likely to fail, but I'm somewhat surprised by the strong opposition to the move. "Ireland" is the common name for the country, and most if not all sources refer to it solely as that. ~~ ] (]) 15:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*:The problem is, that's not the only thing reliable sources refer to as Ireland. The ], for example, happened in ] significantly before ] became a country. There's a whole lot of history that happened in Ireland before 1922/1937.--] (]) 17:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*::Every historical period has its own designation. In the case of the ], it occurred during a time when the country was referred to as ]. While it is possible to refer to the geographical area of any past event, this approach is often imprecise, even though I agree that this does not pertain to the modern-day state of Ireland. However, if no distinct name exists for a specific period, ] would be the preferred option rather than referring solely to the island itself. Short forms are used to describe modern-day countries on Misplaced Pages, even when significant historical periods might be more prominent than the current state (e.g. ], ], and ] refer to the modern-day countries rather than the ], ], or ], let alone the islands or geographical regions they once occupied). Short forms tend to encompass the entire history of a particular area (e.g. ], ], or ]). However, if there is a risk of confusion, disambiguation hatnotes can resolve the issue, as they currently do. –] (]) 18:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' because it's been discussed many times and no new arguments have been made. Seems this is the least bad way to do things. This problem is likely to disappear in the next few years with Irish reunification so it's especially not worth getting exercised about. ] (]) 13:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per the ] 😉 ]'']'' 18:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - How can the page be moved, when we already have an article named ], for the island? You have to have an RM for both articles, not just for the country. ] (]) 15:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
*:That's the reason why I addressed it in the proposal. –] (]) 19:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
*::The island article would have to be changed to "Ireland (island)". Anyways, I don't see either article being moved, anytime soon. ] (]) 19:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)


<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: var(--color-error, red);">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from ] -->
== Changes ==
</div><div style="clear:both;" class=></div>


== WP:IECOLL ==
1. Ireland is not the successor state to the Free State. State succession only happens when it's territory changes.


Time to revisit the decision to abandon the requirement that all naming debates related to Ireland no longer have to take place at ]? The last was very poorly advertised (I ''think'' only on the ] page itself, and it wasn't even flagged on the ]?) and drew only three participants - one of whom was the proposer - and one additional comment, not counting Arbcom members. ]<sup>]</sup> 12:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
2. The, as reverted, article gives two dates for partition: saying 3 May 1921 (unnecessary detail for lead IMHO) and then implying 7 December 1922.
:I honestly don't think it matters where it takes place, it'll happen and continue to happen. The location doesn't change it. I do wonder if it shouldn't be classed as a contentious topic that requires A) logged in and B) extended-confirmed status to stop the drive by IP initiated or SPA discussions and keep the inevitable future discussions to hopefully editors who are a bit more invested, likely to have an actual conversation, and less likely to go off on emotional tirades like we've seen many times in the past. The topic will be discussed, and as long as it's civilised that's fine. It doesn't quite come under The Troubles banner. I don't think location is important. ] ] 16:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
::I was thinking a centralised discussion might at least make it easier to maintain the template listing all past debates... ]<sup>]</sup> 20:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
:::That is a good point. ] ] 15:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
:IMHO, WP:IECOLL should be retired. ] (]) 15:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
::Do you base that on anything? ]<sup>]</sup> 20:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)


== Should "Irish Republic" redirect here? ==
3. The article's current title is "Republic of Ireland" and that should be in bold in the lead.
{{closed|text=
With , {{u|BRMSF}} moved ] to ] and recreated it as a redirect to ]. I don't know enough about the topic to question their argument ({{tq|Almost all uses of the term "Irish Republic" outside of certain ideological or historical contexts refer to the recognized post-1949 state, not to the historic unrecognized state}}) but it is not obviously an uncontroversial move and maybe it should have been discussed first? I'll leave to editors more expert on the topic than I am to judge. ] (]) 13:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)


:Hi. RE:
4. The state was established in 1922.<sup></sup>
:* "not an uncontroversial move". I'm inclined to agree. Personally, per ], given that there had previously been a (somewhat contentious and unsuccessful) discussion to move that title to ], I don't think that title should have been moved and retargeted as it was. Without any discussion at all. Either here. Or at ]. (And, in all honesty, given previous arbitration and ANI engagements (including notice on 1RR and "The Troubles") involving {{u|BRMSF}}, that editor should perhaps have considered opening a thread regardless.)

:* "redirect to Republic of Ireland". I personally don't think the title should be a direct redirect to this title. Even if there was/is consensus that the article (previously at ]) should be moved/retitled, at the very least it should be a DAB page. And not a straight redirect.
5. It is wrong to say that the state "a measure of independence" in 1922. The purely theoretical possibility of British interference in Irish affairs never actually occurred and was expressly repudiated within 10 years of independence. — ] 20:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
:Thanks. ] (]) 13:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

::In keeping with ], I . And . If {{u|BRMSF}} wishes to open a move discussion thread (to confirm whether there's consensus for a move, whether/what the "new" title should be and whether/what should be done with the "old" title), then ] is the place to open such a discussion thread. ] (]) 14:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
:I fixed the obvious errors the rest are about content and need to be agreed upon before they're instated. I'm sure it'll be no problem.] (]) 20:27, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
::My contention is that this was uncontroversial as the state was never given recognition by any other state (save for ], which also had no recognition) - the idea that a defunct unrecognized state which ceased to exist over a century ago should have precedence over a recognized state which is widely referred to by the same title is somewhat strange. For example ] redirects to ], not to ]. ] (]) 16:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
::Lots of funny ideas floating around there....Re "State succession only happens when it's territory changes."...Hmmm? I don't think so. Any sources? And what was "purely theoretical" about the ] and the IFS' obligations to the UK in times of war etc...Funny ideas indeed. Regards. ] (]) 04:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:::Per ], a move is always controversial if "there has been any past debate about the best title for the page." There has been past debate: ]. It is therefore controversial and should only be moved via the process for controversial moves. ] (]) 16:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

::::Hi {{u|BRMSF}}. RE:
== ROI in the lede ==
::::* "contention is that this was uncontroversial". Please read ]. As noted by {{u|DrKay}} above, and per Misplaced Pages convention (as opposed, perhaps, than your own interpretation of "uncontroversial") an undiscussed move should only occur if there {{tq|"has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title"}}. As there had been a previous discussion (in which objections were raised), it wasn't eligible for a bold/uncontroversial move. Regardless of whether the proposed/new title was the same as that discussed before.

::::* "idea that a defunct unrecognized state should have precedence over a recognized state". If you feel the title should be moved, please open a thread (with your proposal/rationale/arguments/etc) at ]. Not here.
Putting it here for greater visibility: I think the current way we include it is very sloppy writing. We don't need to say "the name of Ireland is Ireland". That's just silly and redundant. I propose we follow the standard set by the ] article, where we just say "commonly referred to as" (as it is), leaving the matter of descriptions and names to its own section. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 21:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
::::Thanks. ] (]) 16:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

}}
:What exactly is the text you propose? There is confusion about the name of the state which has Dublin as its capital so it desirable to sort the confusion between ROI which is a description and Ireland which is its name. I think use commonly known as is sloppy in fact and its better if the intro is completely accurate so readers don't get confused. The title of the article can and probably does confuse them in the first place so facts need to be declared in the intro to sort out any potential confusion.] (]) 21:19, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
::I think there is little room for improvement on the existing lead text. ] ] 21:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
::It's just "Ireland". Sometimes, people call it the Republic of... to differentiate from the whole island. There really isn't any confusion. Anyone who's confused by the title of the article being different to the official name is just stupid; we do that for thousands of articles. Look at ] again. It's called the United States ''of America'' in the first sentence. The readers won't be confused at all. Hell, I don't think people will even care. If you want an area where naming can be genuinely confusing, look at the ]. It confuses even the natives (I should know; I'm one of them). ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 21:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
:::So if "There really isn't any confusion" why does it need to be changed? Or are you proposing that we remove any mention of "Republic of Ireland" from the lead and that no reader will question why the article is titled Republic of Ireland.] (]) 22:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
:::The United States reference I just don't get. The "United States of America" commonly referred to as the "United States" would simply become "Ireland" commonly referred to as "Ireland".] (]) 22:13, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
::::There's a difference between confusion and listing alternate names. What I'm proposing, basically, is "'''Ireland''' (Irish: Éire , commonly referred to as the '''Republic of Ireland''')", or, instead of the current sentence: "It is referred to as the '''Republic of Ireland''' to differentiate the state from the island". Whether it's a description or name isn't really a matter for the lede; all we need to say is that it's commonly referred to as such (like the UK is often called Britain, when strictly speaking it's the bigger of the two islands). ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 00:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::I could go with "sometimes referred to as RoI"; certainly not "commonly". ] (]) 01:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::As Wiki calls NI a "country" it is essential that references to Ireland being a "sovereign state" should be changed to "sovereign country". British editors insisted in various debates that Wales and NI be called "countries" rather than provenances, states, territory etc as they perceived anything less to be a diminution of status. So a sovereign country such as Ireland '''must ''' be referred to as a country unless Wiki wishes to rubber-stamp British POV. ] (]) 01:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::I think the lead is fine as it is now. It is clear and accurate in what it says and is not open to varying interpretation of the reader. It basically says its name is Ireland and while sometimes called ROI that is not its name. I'm happy with that. ] (]) 01:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::I also think it is currently as good as it is going to get. Except of course '''Republic of Ireland''' should be "Republic of Ireland". Maybe that can be changed before the title of the article is corrected to Ireland or Belfast is once again a city in Ireland (I wonder which will happen first?)] (]) 07:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::Agree with MusicInTheHouse - the lead is fine as it is. Disagree with Sarah - I see no reason to do something just because the British do. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::Sarah is spot on. Not because that's what anybody else does but because it has always seemed strange to me that at the top of an article (incorrectly) called Republic of Ireland, Ireland was a state and Northern Ireland was a country. It also seems strange to me that Northern Ireland was there at all. How someone looking for the article on a country(not state) called Northern Ireland mistakenly ended up at an article called Republic of Ireland puzzles me as to what they typed in the search box. Now of course if this article was called Ireland there would be some chance of that happening!!] (]) 07:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::Currently, the ] encourages that alternate names be bolded in the lead section. How about this, then?:
::::::<blockquote>'''Ireland''' (Irish: Éire, Irish pronunciation: ) is an island country in north-western Europe. The modern sovereign republic occupies about five-sixths of the island of Ireland, which was partitioned on 3 May 1921. Thus, it is described as the "'''Republic of Ireland'''" to differentiate it from the island. It shares a land border with Northern Ireland to the north east, and is bordered by the Irish Sea to the east, St George's Channel to the south-east, the Celtic Sea to the south and by the Atlantic Ocean to the west and north.</blockquote>
::::::The thing I'm concerned about the most is the apparent need to say that Ireland is the name of the state, when we already do that in the first sentence; the phrase "X is Y" already implies that X is the name of Y. I've included square brackets in the proposal to indicate alternate wordings. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 13:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::The reason we have to say that Ireland is the name of the country is because the name of the article is Republic of Ireland and as it (ROI) appears in bold in the first paragraph of the article it must be made clear to the user that "Republic of Ireland" is not (and never was) the name of the country. Personally I think that no reference to "Republic of Ireland" should be mentioned until the Names section.] (]) 14:04, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::"Currently, the ] encourages that alternate names be bolded in the lead section." would imply that there is no need to have "Republic of Ireland" in bold as it in not an alternate name for "Ireland"] (]) 14:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::That fact is already apparent in the '''first sentence'''. We don't need to repeat it. And frankly, not mentioning "Republic of Ireland" until the names section is actually a POV problem. A good proportion of people do call it the Republic of Ireland (for example, FIFA) because it could be confused with the island. ROI is still a name for the country. An incorrect name (but correct description), but a name nevertheless. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 14:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::And why is mentioning the "Republic of Ireland" in the first paragraph not POV? As regards FIFA you really need to read ] and ]. Using that logic to justify your position would mean that "England", "Wales", "Scotland" and "Northern Ireland" would all be suitable alternative descriptions for "United Kingdom"] (]) 15:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::Because the term "Republic of Ireland" is used by a lot of people and thus it would be an NPOV problem not to recognise this significant minority. The UK argument is a straw man; no-one uses "England", much less "Scotland" and "Wales" to refer to the country. Britain, yes, and that's included in the article. Which is why we should have ROI in the lead section here: it's a valid way of referring to Ireland, and a widely used one at that. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 15:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::So you agree that the FIFA route is not the way to go. Good. Actually people do use the term England when they mean United Kingdom.] (]) 15:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::Still, it's apples and pears. The UK is only ever referred to as England in colloquial speech, and even that's declining. The ''name'' Republic of Ireland is used by (at least) one international organisation because of the island/state confusion. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 16:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Really? Which one? --] (]) 17:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::::Are we still talking about what we started out about? What exactly do you (Sceptre) object to in the current text?] (]) 16:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::::Found it '''We don't need to say "the name of Ireland is Ireland"'''. Yes we do because a lot of people seem to think that "the name of Ireland is the Republic of Ireland" and we must inform them that it is not] (]) 17:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Maybe so, but not in the way we do so right now. It is not part of a good summary of the article to go out of our way to say that such a name is wrong. We don't say in ] that "Great Britain is not the name of the country; rather, it is largest of the islands in the British Isles", even though some people call it Great Britain. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 18:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::::::And where in the lead for the United Kingdom does it say that Great Britian is another description for the United Kingdom? It obviously is your point of view that the summary here is not good. Your also seem to have the point of view that "Republic of Ireland" must be mentioned in the lead. Why that is I am still unclear but you are entitled to your point of view. It is my point of view that "Republic of Ireland" should not even be mentioned in the lead any more than "Southern Ireland", "Irish Republic" or any of the other terms used to indicate that the state rather the Island is in question. Obviously the name of the country is so important in this article that someone (long long before my time) went to the trouble of creating a special section called Name. It is of such importance that it is the first section of the article. Maybe to compromise or maybe achieve NPOV someone (again not me) at some stage mentioned "Republic of Ireland" in the lead but qualified its use by emphasing that "Ireland" is the name (and that "Republic of Ireland" by implication is not).] (]) 19:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) There's just ''too many'' places named Ireland. The Republic could've made things easier, by choosing another 'name' (at least until ''re-unification''). ] (]) 14:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

==Union between Ireland and UK of Great Britain and Ireland ==
Wgh001, you are being unnecessarily pedagogic. The name "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland" lasted right up until 1927 in name, so you are still wrong. You are making understanding increasingly difficult to the reader. If you want to split hairs over my edits, and revert as if you have ownership of the page, then go ahead. This form of hawkishness is driving editors away from WP. ] (]) 17:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:I never said (or meant to imply) that the name "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland" did not last right up until 1927. It is a fact that it did and I have never said otherwise.
:What I am trying to avoid is that a reader will imply that the 1801 act created a union between "Ireland" and "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland"] (]) 18:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::At least we can all agree, the ], became the ] during ]'s reign. ] (]) 14:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

==Ireland (the sovereign country) naming issue==
Could someone tell me where this issue has gone? I thought it was being dealt with somewhere but I can't find anything that isn't closed without any conclusion. I had been asked to hold off proposing a move of the "Republic of Ireland" article pending resolution. It is rather difficult to justify calling Ireland by a "description" rather than its name in the name of disambiguity when we have just had Wiki "consensus" declare that the Irish state is part of the "British" isles on the basis of common usage. DAB requirements and potential confusion of the reader apparently '''don't matter at all in one case''' and are '''the only thing that matters in the other case'''. Clearly such double standards are not consistent with ]. Unless someone can direct me to a live discussion of this issue I intend to propose a move from "RoI" to "Ireland" (And move "Ireland" to "Ireland (island)". ] (]) 18:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:Sarah. If you go ]that's where I last saw it being discussed. But that Dialogue closed before I got there. It really needs to be resolved as the incorrect name for this article is the root cause of most of the problems such as ROI in the lead etc. The article starts by trying to justify the article name and the whole lead is spoilt by it.] (]) 19:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::Where is BHG when you need her? I looked at that page and it seems frozen in time. ] (]) 19:48, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::Froze just yesterday. Maybe everyone is behind the bike shed smoking ;-) --] (]) 20:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
::::Dunno why you think I'm missing: I have been editing a lot recently.
::::The discussion on my talk page was with a few editors who wanted to talk over a few things in relation to the process at ], which is still underway. I haven't sopped discussing the issue, but I closed that thread because not prepared to waste time discussing it with one particular editor whose arguments were getting daft.
::::The taking-statements phase of ] has closed, and the moderators are considering the next steps. This process will take time to resolve such a thorny issue, so please give it time to reach a conclusion, when there will be a decision one way or the other about the name of this page. A proposed move in the meantime will likely be viewed as disruptive. --] <small>] • (])</small> 20:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::@BHG - Just because we have different opinions (and I respect yours, I just don't agree with your position) doesn't mean you should go around name calling.... But since your arguments appear to start with attributing thoughts and words to me and end with resorting to name-calling....perhaps it's a weird form of ] for you...I suppose if it makes you feel better...I ain't ]... --] (]) 00:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::::I didn't call you daft, I called your argument daft. There's a difference, and we all do daft things from time to time.
::::::::::::If you read back, you'll see that I didn't attribute thoughts to you, other than those you wrote yourself. --] <small>] • (])</small> 01:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Nor did I say you called me daft... Sorry - couldn't help trying to get the last word :-) --] (]) 09:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
The crux-of-the-issue is the usage of a ''long-form name'' versus a ''short-form name''. The usage of ] (in English ]) was a purposeful violation of the ''long-form name'' tradition of a ]. Its purpose was clear,

'''(i).''' not to recoginse the existance of the ],

'''(ii).''' to lay claim to the whole ].

] (]) 23:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

:::::::@BHG. They seem to think anyone trying to remove British nationalist pov and restore ] is disruptive. Handy that. When you block and ban the opposition you get...wait for it...yes...'''CONSENSUS!''' (in the Wiki/N Korean style)] (]) 23:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::@BHG - ] is seriously flawed. To sign up to that is to concede that the systemic bias on Wiki is fine so long as it has majority support. Nobody serious about ] who is awake to the issues at stake could agree to the propositions put. While those indifferent to the imposition of British POV or those who support it will understandably partake, the Irish editors who are opposed to the elimination of pov from Ireland-related articles are (IMHO) lacking is understanding of the core problems if they sign on. ] (]) 00:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
::::Sarah, I am not the only Irish editor who takes a different view than you on this subject. I respect your right to your view, but per ], please don't accuse those whose views you share of being ignorant. If you think that the core problems have not been properly set out, then you had an opportunity to make a statement in the ] process setting them out ... and although the deadline has passed, I would be happy to support a request from you to make a late statement if you want to. --] <small>] • (])</small> 01:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

::::: Right at the top of this talk page is a template about the naming dispute :\ ] (]) 21:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

:::::: Crikey what a can of worms! I just had a look at ] and I must say that I can not understand how that is supposed to resolve anything. If anybody out there wants to take me under their wing and enlighten me I would be very thankful. I don't care what your POV is just as long as you can/will explain the process to me. e.g. What the hell is that triangle all about? This is probably not the place for that exercise so may I suggest my own talk page. Thanks in advance.] (]) 01:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::: Hold off on the above a while. I seem to have been logged out or something and am trying to log back in again but having password problems (WGH001 here). Back soon hopefully.] (]) 01:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::: Ok so. Managed to log back in. So if anybody wants to enlighten me please go ahead. Thanks in advance (again).] (]) 01:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
::Sarah77 - The process on the Collaboration page has degenerated into a complete farce and has no credibility...There are no deadlines for a decision by the Moderators who mostly keep very quiet...I think it does not even have a quorum of Moderators at the moment (as one resigned....!!)....The "Statement" process...is now leading onto the "Suggestions" process....more statements and arguments under a different guise. Your input on the Collaboration page would be very welcome! Regards. ] (]) 02:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
::Ps - For the most part, I have argued for the Moderators to step up and make the decision. Regards. ] (]) 02:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

When an editor can specifically ''not'' endorse a verifiable, factual proposition such as "The ''description'' of the state is defined in law as "the Republic of Ireland", by Section 2 of the , which says in full: "It is hereby declared that the description of the State shall be the Republic of Ireland." - and not be called on it - then yeah, the process may be somewhat flawed. Still, per Arbcom, it's the only game in town. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::That's bad enough, but my favourite visitations from the parallel universe are elsewhere on the same page: the editor ], and the ] (check his d.o.b. when reading that proposition). --] <small>] • (])</small> 15:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

:::::::::'''No @ BHG'''. McGuinness was born in Ireland (the island) but not Ireland the sovereign country. Etcetera. Your loaded questions requiring a yes/no are thus impossible to agree with. It's folk who (a) support "British Isles" including Ireland (state) on a 'common use' basis and (b) reject the common use of Ireland for the state on a dab basis and then (c) deny British pov is imposing double standards who are in an alternate universe. As for AGF, I'm running out of it - I'm made my observations on the dynamics of the Wiki-process and how it facilitates the elimination of ] repeatedly. Sadly, if you say you don't agree with the blindingly obvious I can only assume that (1) you don't understand my point or (2) you pretend not to. ] (]) 22:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::Sarah, as you should well know from previous discussions, I do not support use of the term "British Isles" because there is a perfectly simple NPOV phrase available whose meaning is clear and which carries no POV: "Britain and Ireland". If the best you can do is to accuse any Irish editor who disagrees with you of having "a British POV", then you have run out of arguments are just resorting to name-calling.
::::::::::As to ], if you ask him "Martin, were you born in Ireland?", what answer to you think you are going to get? What answer do you think you'll get if you go and ask people on a street in Dublin or Galway or Sligo por Cork a yes/no question "was Martin McGuiness born in Ireland"?
::::::::::If you think that the primary meaning of "Ireland" is the 26-county state, then the article on him is currently misleading. Per the MoS, an article should explain its meaning in the text, and a reader should not have to rely on a link to determine that a secondary use of the term is being made, so it should ''not'' say that he "is an ] ]", because by your interpretation of the word "Ireland" that would mean that McGuinness is a politician in or from the 26-county state; it should say something like that McGuinness "is an ] in the ]". Are you going to edit the articles on McGuinness and all his republican colleagues to reflect this?
::::::::::And yes, I do understand your view on that point. I just want to clarify whether you and others who want to invert the normal meaning of words accept the logical consequences of that interpretation and are prepared to implement them by qualifying the Irishness of people in ].
::::::::::What I don't understand, though, is your opposition to ], which reads: ''The following statement was true in 1798: "Lough Neagh is a lake in Ireland"]].'' C'mon, Sarah, explain this. Where was Lough Neagh at the time? --] <small>] • (])</small> 02:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

:Hello Bastun,
:''"The ''description'' of the state is defined in law as "the Republic of Ireland"''
:I openly question the sincerity of the usage of the term ''"legal description"'' instead of the standard term ''"Name"''. The ] and the ] are word-smithing ... at '''its worst'''.

] (]) 15:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
:::Pretty clear to me the difference between a name and a description, and I'd say the ] was another exercise in political wrangling and word-smithing. But I'm astonished at all the very old people editing Misplaced Pages that can attribute emotions and motives to events all that long ago. Or maybe....For those that seem to have trouble operating their time machines. This is 2009. Please rotate the dials accordingly. --] (]) 15:32, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

::Hello HighKing.

::One of the intepretations of a "Name" ''is'' a "legal description". This in itself is thumbing-its-nose at legal tradition.

::The '''Lordship of Ireland''', '''Kingdom of Ireland''', '''Irish Republic''', '''Irish Free State''', and the '''Province of Northern Ireland''' then ], ... just ]

::WHY JUST BLOODY ]?

::WHY?????

::] (]) 15:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
:::If there were no difference the 1948 Act could be seen as replacing the constitution. There is a big difference legally. It's why names are so important. It's why the High Court of Ireland rejected an extradition warrant using Éire. It's why our diplomats now present their credentials as "Ireland" in all countries of the world. It's why the PGCN was established to correctly name countries. In your mind there may be very little difference, but I guess that's why we don't agree. In mine, there is a notable difference. --] (]) 16:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello HighKing.

Thank you for your thoughtful response, I appreciate it very much. You are very polite to talk to, and I really enjoy discussing things with you.

:''Arthur Fox-Davies, Philip William Poole Carlyon-Briton'',

:''' ''A Treatise on the Law Concerning Names and Changes of Name'' ''' (1906)

:http://www.archive.org/details/treatiseonlawcon00foxdiala

I am researching the subject of "Name(s)".

Take care, ] (]) 19:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

:I've no problem with waiting on the Collaboration's solutions. I just hope, the sides that don't get what they wish, will ''accept'' the results. ] (]) 14:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Sarah had been asked to hold off proposing a move of the "Republic of Ireland" article pending resolution on ] with ] suggesting that "''A proposed move in the meantime will likely be viewed as disruptive''" however, when I made this point it was ignored. So we had a page move without discussion, having informed editors of ]. I agree ] with waiting on the Collaboration's solutions, but we need to be consistent. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 07:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:In agreement. ] (]) 16:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
::And you were expecting consistency were you Domer?!!! The only thing consistently at work here is the imposition of British POV. ] (]) 22:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Of course not a chara! LOL. The move was done without discussion. You ], and point editors to ]. This is ignored, and supported regardless. Now if you or I had done this? --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 11:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

==PGCN, what is that?==

Uuummm,

:''"It's why the PGCN was established to correctly name countries."''

What is the PGCN eh?

] (]) 20:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
:Apologies - a typo. It should have been the . --] (]) 09:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:: What the PCGN says makes no difference to the debate on the name, no one is saying Ireland isnt the correct name of the state the problem is its also the name of an Island. So like with ], like with ], like with ] the state can not be given priority. ] (]) 10:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:::''What the PCGN says makes no difference to the debate on the name'' - I think you intended this to read ''What the PCGN says makes no difference '''to me''' to the debate on the name''. Big difference. --] (]) 11:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:::: Umm no, i meant what i said so please dont try and correct me. The reason this article is currently at Republic of Ireland is not because people dispute the name of the state but because there is also an island called Ireland and i fail to see why the people of Northern Ireland should be ignored. Again, i notice on the site u linked it simply says Georgia is the title of a country, and yet the country Georiga is not found at ]. ] (]) 11:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::Ummmm ... rather big of you to dismiss a British organization set up to ensure the correct usage of country names within British government and state that it makes ''no difference to the the debate on the name''. But I'm sure your opinions and credentials are vastly superior.... --] (]) 11:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::: You are completly missing the point, nobody is saying the republic of Ireland is the correct title for the country. What people do say is that there is also an island called Ireland and there for its wrong for the state to take priority over the island. This is what happens in the case of China and Taiwan. The British organisation also says that Georgia is the only title to describe the country and yet is a disam page on wikipedia. Your biased and opinionated views on this matter clearly clouds ur judgement so lets leave it at that. Thanks ] (]) 12:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::The PGCN just confirms that "Ireland" is the formal name of the 26-county state. However, that point is not in dispute; the issue at stake in ] is how to disambiguate it from the identically-named island. --] <small>] • (])</small> 12:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::Thanks BHG. By way of summary, the point initially made by ArmChair was that names weren't important, and that names and descriptions were somehow, legally, analagous. I pointed to the PCGN by way of showing that names are important and taken seriously. The point made by BriWat is that what the PCGN says is irrelevant to this debate - but I'm not sure any more which debate we're talking about. I pointed out the PCGN to Armchair in reference to a single point - not as a flag-in-the-ground for the entire debate. In the overall scheme of the larger debate, it's probably notable that until very recently, the only reference that the British establishment recognized the name "Ireland" in any sort of official capacity was a rather woolly reference to the 1998 GFA, so it's notable that the British establishment now appears to recognize the name "Ireland" and recommend it's use (un)officially(?). It's up to other editors to figure out if they believe it has any relevance - no harm in pointint it out and trying to explain any potential significance. --] (]) 13:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) Wiki-life would've been a lot easier, if the republic had chosen a different name. ] (]) 16:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:They wanted to (and did) claim the entirety of the island. They were making a point which the British reacted to. ] ] 18:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello Kittybrewster.

Yes by ] assuming the Name of ] (and just ]) ... this ''"whole-sorted-mess"'' got going.

The Name '''Republic of ''' ], or the Name of the ] '''Republic''' would have done very nicely.

] (]) 21:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

::What is the '''PCGN'''?

::Could someone please tell me?

::] (]) 21:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::There's a link to the PCGN above. --] (]) 23:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

::: The Irish Republic would have been a good name, like the Czech Republic its rather catchy. The Republic of Eire sounds very strange though. As for the PCGN, he gave u a link before http://www.pcgn.org.uk/ ] (]) 21:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

::::Myself I think the current situation is the best; the sovereign country is '''Ireland''', the British bit is '''Northern Ireland''' and the whole is the '''island of Ireland'''. Only those pushing British pov could pretend to be confused by this. ] (]) 22:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


] contains the ] and the ] (a sub-national member of the UK).

] (]) 03:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
:What's with this '''Province of Northern Ireland''' stuff? We've enough headaches fighting over '''Republic of Ireland''', '''Ireland''' & '''Ireland (disambiguation)'''. ] (]) 14:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Howdy GoodDay.

http://www.flags.net/NOIR.htm

'''Northern Ireland'''

Formal Name:
'''Province of Northern Ireland'''

Local Name:
'''Ulster'''

Local Formal Name:
'''Province of Northern Ireland'''

Take care, my friend ] (]) 11:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

== pov - we stick to facts ==

Which of the following is not a fact?

Ireland was officially a dominion of the British Commonwealth until April 1949.

Donegal is the most nothern county in Ireland.
] (]) 21:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

:The whole edit I reverted attempts to comment on the names. That is pov by its definition. It's personal opinion. Misplaced Pages doesn't need that.] (]) 21:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

::The former is not a "fact"; a fact would be "the British called Ireland a dominion of the British Commonwealth until April 1949". The natives regarded that as a temporary fiction. ] (]) 22:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)



:::Example: I don't live on a British Isle even though Wiki calls my home one of the British Isles. '''Fact'''. I could parody BHG's yes/no process here to illustrate how irrational it is. In fact, maybe I will! ] (]) 22:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
::::MusicInTheHouse why is it personal opinion that Donegal is the most nothern county in Ireland? Have we been shown the maps the wrong way around or what?] (]) 00:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::Donegal ''is'' the most northern county in the republic. ] (]) 14:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::It is GoodDay; however that is irrelevant to the actual edit that took place.] (]) 14:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Also, what is today 'the republic', didn't get ''full independance'' from the United Kingdom, until 1949. ] (]) 15:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::Depends whether you view independence as something that is given or taken. ] (]) 15:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::Most importantly, it occured in 1949. ] (]) 15:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::I have been in Donegal. ] (]) 16:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::So everyone agrees that County Donegal is the most nothern county in the island of Ireland?] (]) 19:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes. But can we also agree that that fact has no reason to belong in a section about the country's name?] (]) 20:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
:I completely disagree about the Donegal statement. Donegal is home to Ireland's most northerly point, ], but we cannot say that Donegal is the most Northerly county on the island. The City of Derry is more to the North than Donegal Town, for example. If you want to just talk about the Republic, then it is clear that a very small part of coastal Leitrim is more northerly than the extreme south of Donegal. Check any good political map for evidence of this. ] (]) 22:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


A picture is ''"worth-a-thousand-words"...

].]]

The ] holds 32 Counties. The ] holds 4 ]s into which the 32 Counties are contained. The ] covered the entire ] from 1171 to 1541. Afterwards the ] covered the whole ] from 1541 to 1800. On Janurary 1, 1801 the ] joined the Union and became the 4th ] of the ].

On December 6, 1921 the ] was signed, and this resulted in the ] of the ] into the ] and the ], the latter remaining apart of the Union.

The ] received the ], the ], and the ] in their entirety. The ] was split between the ''new'' ], and the ''new'' ]. The ] received the ] with only 3 Counties , the ], the ], and the ]. Thus, the ] was created with 4 ]s and 26 Counties.

In contrast, the ''new'' ] received 6 (of 9) Counties from the partitioned ]. Thus the ] was created with 6 Counties, namely, the ], ], ], ], ] and the ]. ] (]) 23:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

:Hmmmm.....I doubt is any of this will come as a surprise to anyone! ] (]) 00:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

::Sarah ... the map clears up the arguement. Do you have to critisise everything? ] (]) 00:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

::: Just what argument does it clear up None of that is under dispute as far as I can see (and please, please learn to confirm with WIkipedia standards on the use of indented threads in conversations, everyone else does.) --] (]) 06:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
:::: MusicInTheHouse where and why was it agreed that this fact would not be mentioned in the article? Why is it a secret?] (]) 09:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


re the above: ''The Irish Free State received the Province of Leinster, the Province of Connaught, and the Province of Munster in their entirety. The Province of Ulster was split between the new Irish Free State, and the new Province of Northern Ireland.'' Thats not quite true - The Irish Free State "received" the whole island of ireland. Northern Ireland then decided to leave the Irish Free State. To rephrase your language: ''The Irish Free State received the whole of the island of Ireland in its entirety. The United Kingdom received Northern Ireland from the Irish Free State. Ulster was then split between the new Irish Free State, and the new Province of Northern Ireland.'' ... province of NI being perhaps inapt. See ]. Regards. ] (]) 20:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

==The Map in the Middle==
Does anyone else think the "county" map in the middle of the article page looks bad? Ugly even? Can we downsize/redraw/reorganise it? Maybe even use this one - it looks much better. ] (]) 16:57, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

:Fully agree. It looks ugly. Regards. ] (]) 20:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
::Agree. Maybe use which one? ] ] 20:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
:::Hmmm. I was certain I linked it. ] (]) 23:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
::::Look up above - it has been deleted. Must not have been free of possible copyright. ] (]) 23:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

== A data-point on the naming-issue: Wolfram Alpha trips up on the name Misplaced Pages uses for Ireland the state ==

On the Wolfram Alpha datasheet on "Ireland" (by which it means the sovereign state) I get a suggested Internet link to Misplaced Pages's ] article, i.e. the wrong one. ] isn't mentioned by Wolfram Alpha -- either as a Misplaced Pages link or as a phrase in its own right, which is fine because it's not needed in my opinion, if it weren't for Misplaced Pages's weird naming scheme. (Weirdly, ] is mentioned, but that's Wolfram Alpha for you :) ).

Surely this is a high-profile example of Misplaced Pages getting it wrong and/or making life harder for others on the naming issue?

The ways I got to Wolfram Alpha's "Ireland" page are: clicking "Ireland" as a bordering country from the UK datasheet; typing "Ireland" as a look-up string, and typing "Republic of Ireland" as a look-up string. All of these bring me to a datasheet called "Ireland" that refers to the sovereign state. ] (]) 15:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
:Who or what is "Wolfram Alpha"? ] (]) 15:34, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
:: Some strange new search engine - http://www.wolframalpha.com/ . The Ireland thing is the least of the problems. Enter England it takes you to the United Kingdom, but enter Scotland it talks of the Kingdom of Scotland. What a silly service. Lmao, look at Wales. ] (]) 15:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

== Use of "Ireland" in the intro ==

I reverted edits by Mooretwin and Rapparee71 to the opening line for the following reasons:

* Whatever about the title of the article, the official name of the state and, more importantly, the common name of the state is ''Ireland''. See ] for a similar opener.
* The Supreme Court ruled (during the curfuffle with extradition during the '80s) that the ''Éire'' is not the official name of the state in English - only ''Ireland'' is.

--<span style="font-family:Bunchló GC,BunchlÛ GC,inherit,sans-serif;">rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid <small>(])</small></span> 13:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::I see no reason why this should not follow the example of ], which starts: "'''France''' (officially the '''French Republic''') ...". ] (]) 13:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

::See . The title of the article should be stated in the first sentence. Hence best to have something like "The '''Republic of Ireland''' (officially '''Ireland''') is ...". ] (]) 13:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

:::''"this is not mandatory, and inclusion should reflect consensus."'' Consensus has been agreed to show the correct name. "''if the title of a page is descriptive it does not need to appear verbatim in the main text''". What is ROI? A description? It does not need to be shown.] 13:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::ROI is not "merely descriptive" as is meant by ] which says: "However, if the article title is merely descriptive—such as Electrical characteristics of dynamic loudspeakers—the title does not need to appear verbatim in the main text." ROI is used as a name in this article. ] (]) 13:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::When was consensus for the current opening sentence agreed? ] (]) 13:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::Long ago. But never mind that ]. --<span style="font-family:Bunchló GC,BunchlÛ GC,inherit,sans-serif;">rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid <small>(])</small></span> 14:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::::I don't think it was long ago. ] (]) 15:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Well, ]. --<span style="font-family:Bunchló GC,BunchlÛ GC,inherit,sans-serif;">rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid <small>(])</small></span> 15:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


:No need to explain your revert. Mooretwin's edit was quite disruptive, it went against previous consensus and he provided a misleading edit summary. How can one assume good faith with an editor when they go and do something like that?] 13:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::Please restrict your comments to the article and do not attack other editors. Please retract the above. ] (]) 13:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::I will retract it if you cease your disruptive editing.] 13:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::I haven't begun disruptive editing, therefore I can't cease. Please retract the personal attack: ] ] (]) 13:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

:::Normally the title of the article is the as the name of the thing, but there is no requirment to do so.
:::Also from ]: "When the page title is used as the subject of the first sentence, it may appear in a slightly different form, and it may include variations, including synonyms."
:::<strike>(Not to mention the following for all those to whom ''Republic of Ireland'' is merely a description: "... if the article title is merely descriptive...the title does not need to appear verbatim in the main text.") --<span style="font-family:Bunchló GC,BunchlÛ GC,inherit,sans-serif;">rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid <small>(])</small></span> 13:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)<strike> <small>(I meant this tongue-in-cheeck, but that appears to have been lost. --<span style="font-family:Bunchló GC,BunchlÛ GC,inherit,sans-serif;">rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid <small>(])</small></span> 13:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC))</small>
::::"Ireland" is not a "slightly different form" or a "variation" of "Republic of Ireland". And the article title is not "merely descriptive" (see the example given for what is meant by "merely descriptive"). ] (]) 13:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::What is wrong with "The '''Republic of Ireland''' (officially '''Ireland''') ...". Let's edit with the reader in mind, this opener tells him straight off exactly what he needs to know. The current sentence will leave him wondering why the article refers to Ireland and not Republic of Ireland. ] (]) 13:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::Is the "Republic of Ireland" officially a name or a description? If you deny that its a description and say its a name then you are arguing this because you ] the facts. If you agree its a description then its pretty clear what Misplaced Pages policy says to do with descriptions in the intro.] 13:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::::It's "officially" a "description", but in reality it is a name (note the capital letters) and is used in the article title as a name. The WP policy is "pretty clear" as referring to descriptive phrases like of "Electrical characteristics of dynamic loudspeakers" (i.e. those which do not lend themselves to a simple introduction). ] (]) 15:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::::That answer is just pure POV. The facts completely disagree with you. It's a description like it or not. And you clearly ].] 15:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::::It's "officially" a description. In reality it's a name and is used as a name. It's used as a name in the title of this article. If it were a description it would simply be "republic". ] (]) 22:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Can any reputable source back that up? The answer is no as that is your POV intrepration and holds no weight on this encyclopedia.] 22:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::::::Do you understand what the word name means in English? Republic of Ireland is used as an alternative name for the 26-county state. That is its use in the title of this article. You don't need a "reputable source" to back up basic English. ] (]) 22:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::No Republic of Ireland is used as an article title, not a name. Misplaced Pages rightly says ROI is not a name of the state. You may refuse to accept the country's real official name and like to use ROI instead but that does not make correct. The sources say its not a name; its just the way it is; like it or not I'm afraid.] 23:04, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::It's not the "official" name, but it's used frequently as an alternative name, given the ambiguous nature of the "official" name. Do a Google for "Republic of Ireland" and it'll throw up loads of examples. ] (]) 23:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::::The only examples google gives me are pages on the football team who have to use ROI as their name and Wiki pages. I'm not sure what a google search proves?] 23:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Well, the football team is an example of using ROI as an alternative name. There must be some glitch in your browser: http://www.boi.ie/index.html 1], , , , , , , ] (]) 23:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


MusicInTheHouse seriously just ignore that type of discussion. References talk BS walks. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 23:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

:::::"Let's edit with the reader in mind, him straight off exactly what he needs to know." Let's. So with that in mind, what's more right about the opener you propose? What's more wrong with the current version? How does the current version mislead the reader? How would your proposal correct misconceptions they may have and educate them more about the topic? --<span style="font-family:Bunchló GC,BunchlÛ GC,inherit,sans-serif;">rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid <small>(])</small></span> 13:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::::What is more "right" with the opener is that it uses the article title as per preferred WP policy. The current version is more "wrong" because it doesn't refer to the article title and therefore the reader will wonder why. The current version may not necessarily "mislead" the reader, but it fails to inform him clearly and immediately that the Republic of Ireland and "Ireland" are the same. I would propose to correct misconceptions they may have and educate them more about the topic by starting "The '''Republic of Ireland''' (officially '''Ireland''') ..." which succinctly, clearly, and within WP policy tells the reader what he immediately needs to understand. What is wrong with that? (This follows the model provided on ]: "'''France''' (officially the '''French Republic''') ...") ] (]) 15:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::::I strongly disagree. This is just yourself POV pushing for the POV reasons you give above. Other editors don't agree with you, Misplaced Pages policy doesn't agree with you and the facts don't agree with you. This change has no merit.] 15:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::::"The name of the state is ''Ireland'', while the description the ''Republic of Ireland'' is sometimes used when there is a need to differentiate the state from the island." What could be more clear or immediate without the article being about the term itself like Domer48 prefers below? Unlike ''French Republic'', the common name of the Irish state is the official name. There is no need for clarifiers like they have on the French article. --<span style="font-family:Bunchló GC,BunchlÛ GC,inherit,sans-serif;">rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid <small>(])</small></span> 17:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::There is a need for clarifiers: so as to inform the reader. ] (]) 22:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::::::Agreed. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

This article is about Republic of Ireland, which is a descriptive term. This article should be about that and not ]. We have an article on ] and this is nothing more than a POV fork. I’ll put some information on the Republic of Ireland article together, because like Mooretwin says, the information in the article “doesn't refer to the article title and therefore the reader will wonder why. If the reader want to read an article on Ireland, they will look to the Ireland Article. If however, they want to know about the term/title Republic of Ireland they will get it here. At the moment they don't. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 16:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

:This article is about the state. This article will remain to be about that until/unless decided otherwise at the Arbcom-appointed process looking at the naming of ], ] and ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Stop please! This article is titled Republic of Ireland. That is a descriptive term and is not the name of the state. Now get over it. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 18:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

The European Union, note that the names of the Member States of the European Union must always be written and abbreviated according to the Interinstitutional Style Guide rules and that neither “Republic of Ireland” nor “Irish Republic” should be used when referring to the Irish State. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 18:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:This isn't the European Union. ] (]) 22:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::No it isn't but what the European Union say means a lot more to this encyclopedia than editors making rash POV statements as if they were facts.] 22:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
:::Odd, then, that WP uses Republic of Ireland. ] (]) 22:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
::::Not for long Mooretwin, not for long.] 22:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

All we need is for Admin's who are willing to step up to the plate!!!!--<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 23:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

== Commonwealth in lead ==
Could someone provide a reference for ''It had already ceased to participate in that organisation.'' in the lead paragraph? I can't see a direct reference to that anywhere else in the article and it seems an odd ancillary detail to feature in the lead of such an rich article, especially unsourced. Assuming this can be sourced, wouldn't it be better placed in the appropriate section? ]<font color="black">e</font>] 17:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

:Hi Rock, the reference you'd need would be this one "Daltún Ó Ceallaigh, ''Britain & Ireland, Sovereignty & Nationality'', Elo Press Ltd (Ireland), ISBN 0 9518777 4 7, Pg. 77" but since I think the article is nothing more than a POV fork I'll not be adding it. LOL. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 18:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

==Republic of Ireland '''is not''' the title of the Irish State.==
It is beyond stupidity to continue to attempt to foist this POV inspired nonsense on both editors and more importantly on our readers. Republic of Ireland is a '''descriptive term'''! It is not an official or unofficial name for the state. The article should therefore deal with the term Republic of Ireland, its history and origins and the Republic of Ireland Act, 1948 Article should deal with the act itself. To illustrate this point, I have put together a brief history, which is more or less what this article should be about. It is my intension to insert this into the article, and to have the current contents move to the article ] were it belongs. The first editor to even suggest that Ireland for the name of the State or Country is ambiguous is flogging a well dead horse and simply pushing a POV. Because as this rough article illustrates, Republic of Ireland's use as a name for the Irish State is pure POV. It is the continuance of a debate that is long gone, over and dealt with by both the Irish, British and international community.

:ROI is probably going to become a redirect to the new title for the page (whatever it'll be). Once the page moves you can try gain consensus for adding content to the redirect if you wish, although I think you're a bit early in the article title process to be raising this.] 20:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Republic of Ireland is a '''descriptive term''' right? No one is disputing that? Republic of Ireland is not an official or unofficial name for the state right? No one is disputing that? So why is this article about the State? The name of the State is Ireland right? It is the official name for the State and country. The European Union, note that the names of the Member States of the European Union must always be written and abbreviated according to the and that neither “Republic of Ireland” nor “Irish Republic” should be used when referring to the Irish State. This also includes Ireland's geographical name. So it's time to end this POV inspired nonsense. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 21:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

: I wouldn't suggest attempting such a bold move without consensus first. It will simply be reverted. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 22:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

::Indeed. There's an Arbcom-initiated process ongoing. See the notice at the top of the page. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Rock we both know that ] All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. If by being ] I insert the information, the the burden of evidence lies with me the editor, however this is also true of editors who wish to remove it. So for example, in responce to a clear supported statement of fact like we get idiotic nonsense like well we all know were the burden of evidence lies. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 23:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

===Republic of Ireland===
On April 18, 1949, The Republic of Ireland Act, 1948 (No. 22 of 1948), came into operation. Under the Act, Ireland formally left the British Commonwealth and became a independent Republic. To affirm this section two of the Act stated "It is hereby declared that the description of the State shall be the Republic of Ireland."

The final breaking of the ties between Ireland and Britain however occurred in 1937. de Valera's who had gradual whittled away the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1922 had significantly accomplished it with a new in 1937. With its introduction, there would no longer be a Governor General representing the King, but a President who would be elected by the people. This had all been made possible by the British government’s introduction of the Statute of Westminster 1931 which granted sovereignty to its dominions.<ref>Daltún Ó Ceallaigh, ''Britain & Ireland, Sovereignty & Nationality'', Elo Press Ltd (Ireland), ISBN 0 9518777 4 7, Pg. 77</ref>

In 1938, the British government legislating for certain accords with the Irish State, included the following in the Eire (Confirmation of Agreements) Act:<ref>Daltún Ó Ceallaigh, ''Britain & Ireland, Sovereignty & Nationality'', Elo Press Ltd (Ireland), ISBN 0 9518777 4 7, Pg. 78</ref> {{cquote|The territory which, in accordance with the provisions of the Irish Free State (Agreement) Act, 1922, and the Irish Free State Constitution Act, 1922, ... was required to be styled and known as the Irish Free State shall be styled and known as Eire, and accordingly, references in any enactment to the Irish Free State shall be construed as references to Eire. (s 1)}}

This reflected in British law the Irish Constitution of 1937, which meant that, in British and unionist minds, the twenty-six counties had become “Eire”.<ref>Daltún Ó Ceallaigh, ''Britain & Ireland, Sovereignty & Nationality'', Elo Press Ltd (Ireland), ISBN 0 9518777 4 7, Pg. 78</ref>

The Irish Constitution had facilitated this usage by the British government by saying that: {{cquote|The name of the State isÉire, or in the English language, Ireland.<ref>.</ref>}}

The phrase “or in the English language, Ireland” had been a late insertion, according to Mary Daly, and was adopted on the foot of an amendment tabled in Dáil Éireann by an independent T. D. (deputy). A typewritten preliminary draft of Heads of Constitution for Saorstát Éireann she says, dated 18 May 1936, by John Hearne, who was a legal adviser in the Department of External Affairs, and played a leading role in drafting the 1937 Constitution, gave Article 1 as “Saorstát Éireann is a sovereign, independent state,” but Saorstát Éireann was crossed out in pencil and replaced with Eire, and this was repeated throughout Hearne’s draft. In a version dated 14 October 1936, Article 1 Daly notes, used the term “The Irish Nation”; this draft referred to “the parliament of Eire” and “the laws of Eire.” <ref></ref>

Daltún Ó Callaigh suggests that a better drafting would have been simply “The name of the State is Ireland” and, in the Irish version, “Is ainm don Stét Eire”. He maintains that the existing style is rather like a German constitution saying in translation: “The name of the State is Deutschland or in the English language Germany.” Ó Callaigh noted that the Irish practice is peculiar, and that it facilitated partitionists by giving them a word to describe “the twenty-six counties which made the area seem to a non-Irish speaker like a natural entity in itself.”<ref>Daltún Ó Ceallaigh, ''Britain & Ireland, Sovereignty & Nationality'', Elo Press Ltd (Ireland), ISBN 0 9518777 4 7, Pg. 78</ref>

The British government would not use the term “Ireland” in any official document according to Daly until the 1998 Belfast/Good Friday Agreement, which included she said, an undertaking by the Irish government to delete Articles 2 and 3 of the Irish Constitution. Britain’s refusal to use the constitutional title of the Irish state, and its efforts to persuade other nations to adopt a similar practice, can be interpreted Daly says, as an effort to exercise a residual authority over independent Ireland. Britain appeared to have gone to significant lengths she says, to stop international organizations from using the name Ireland to designate the twenty six county state, and that this was often in response to pressure from the Northern Ireland government. In March 1938, the Irish government issued a directive to departments that “generally we should try to have Ireland and Irish used so far as possible in the English language in preference to Éire and ‘of Éire.’” The resolve on the part of the Irish government to call the state Ireland rather than Éire was Daly suggests, a reaction to the Britain’s decision to use Eire (without the accent) as the name of the independent Irish state. <ref></ref>

According to Daly, the British government refusal to use the constitutional title of the Irish state was because they interpreted it as a claim by the Irish Government to the entire island. To support this interpretation they pointed to Article 2 of the Irish Constitution, which stated that “the national territory consists of the whole island of Ireland, its islands and the territorial seas.” However, Article 3, qualified this claim: <ref></ref> {{cquote|Pending the reintegration of the national territory, and without prejudice to the right of the Parliament and Government established by this Constitution to exercise jurisdiction over the whole of that territory, the laws enacted by that parliament shall have the like area and extent of applications as the laws of Saorstát Éireann and the like extra territorial effect.}}

The Irish State was now in essence a republic, but it still did not describe itself as such. This final step would be legislated for and the Irish government signalled its intension to cut all remaining ties with the Commonwealth.<ref>Daltún Ó Ceallaigh, ''Britain & Ireland, Sovereignty & Nationality'', Elo Press Ltd (Ireland), ISBN 0 9518777 4 7, Pg. 79</ref> In July 1948, a number of months before the Republic of Ireland Bill was introduced, the Minister for External Affairs, Seán MacBride, told the Dáil that Ireland was “certainly not a member of the British Commonwealth of Nations.” The Taoiseach John A. Costello explained that Ireland’s exit from the Commonwealth had been “a gradual development.” <ref></ref> In 1949 Ireland by passing the Republic of Ireland Act 1949, became a republic and left the Commonwealth. This decision to declare a republic, consisted of all political parties except Fianna Fáil. <ref></ref>

The British government then passed the Ireland Act, which stated:<ref>Daltún Ó Ceallaigh, ''Britain & Ireland, Sovereignty & Nationality'', Elo Press Ltd (Ireland), ISBN 0 9518777 4 7, Pg. 79</ref><ref></ref> {{cquote|It is hereby recognized and declared that the part of Ireland heretofore known as Eire ceased, as from the eighteenth day of April, nineteen hundred and forty-nine, to be part of His Majesty’s dominions.” (s 1.1)}} When the Ireland Act had been passed Attlee the British priminister set out the protocol for future relations with Ireland, which though no longer a member of the Commonwealth, was not to be treated as a foreign state, "in view of the bonds of history and blood between the Commonwealth countries and the people of Southern Ireland."<ref></ref>

In other words according to Ó Callaigh, it was acknowledged that “Eire” had become a republic in every sense and was outside not only the United Kingdom, as the twenty-six counties “had been in one way or another since 1922,” but the royal domain altogether, or “the Commonwealth” of which the British King was Head.<ref>Daltún Ó Ceallaigh, ''Britain & Ireland, Sovereignty & Nationality'', Elo Press Ltd (Ireland), ISBN 0 9518777 4 7, Pg. 79</ref>

The 1948 Republic of Ireland Act however led to further misunderstanding over the name of the state. Section 2 stated: {{cquote|that the description of the State shall be the Republic of Ireland.}} In Dáil Éireann, while introducing the bill John A. Costello stressed that it did not purport to amend the constitution of 1937: <ref></ref>{{cquote|There is the name of the State and there is the description of the State. The name of the State is Ireland and the description of the State is the Republic of Ireland. That is the description of its constitutional and international status.}}

The Government Information Bureau in 1953 issued a directive, noting that Article 4 of the 1937 Constitution gave the name as “Éire” or, in the English language, “Ireland”; they noted that whenever the name of the state was mentioned in an English language document, Ireland should be used and that “Care should be taken,” the directive stated, “to avoid the use of the expression Republic of Ireland or Irish Republic in such a context or in such a manner as might suggest that it is a geographical term applicable to the area of the Twenty‐Six counties.” This directive according to Daly remained in use for a number of years and that a copy was sent to Bord Fáilte, (the Irish tourist board), in 1959, reminding them not to use the title “the Republic of Ireland” on their promotional literature.<ref></ref>

In 1963 under the auspices of the Council of Europe, to revise geography textbooks, the Irish Department of Education issued guidelines to delegates on politically correct geographic terminology: “British Isles” and “United Kingdom” were deemed objectionable and that delegates insist on “Ireland” and "Great Britain." The term "Republic of Ireland" should be avoided but that delegates were no longer to insist on “the Six Counties” in place of “Northern Ireland” in an attempt to improve relations with Northern Ireland. <ref></ref>

In February 1964, the Irish government indicated it's wished to appoint an ambassador to Canberra. The one issues however that blocked the exchange of ambassadors had been the insistence of Australia that the letters carried by the Irish ambassador should have the royal title as "Queen Elizabeth the Second of the United Kingdom, Greater Britain and Northern Ireland, Australia." This was according to Daly, despite the fact that the Royal Style and Titles Act did not mention Northern Ireland. However that November when Eoin MacWhite presented his credentials as Irish ambassador to Australia, a circular was issued to all Australian government departments indicating to them to use the word "Ireland" rather than "the Irish Republic." Britain was by the mid 1960s, the only country not to refer to the state as Ireland.<ref></ref>

In 1985 the British command papers described the Anglo‐Irish Agreement as an "agreement between the government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the government of the Republic of Ireland," with the Irish official papers described it as an "agreement between the government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the government of Ireland." The British Foreign and Commonwealth Office referred to Ireland as the "Republic of Ireland" however since 2000 it has referred to the State as "Ireland." The credentials presented by the British ambassador, Stewart Eldon, in 2003, were addressed to the President of Ireland.<ref></ref>


== Article title ==
To day, the European Union, note that the names of the Member States of the European Union must always be written and abbreviated according to the Interinstitutional Style Guide rules and that neither “Republic of Ireland” nor “Irish Republic” should be used when referring to the Irish State.


The official name of the country is '''Ireland''', not the "Republic of Ireland". Why can't we just move the title to "Ireland" and move the current article ] to "Ireland (island)"? ] (]) 22:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
===References===
{{reflist|2}}


:See ]. ] (<span style="font-variant:small-caps">]</span>) 22:25, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
===External links===
*
*
*

Latest revision as of 22:24, 28 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Republic of Ireland article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated, especially about the article's title. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting on that topic.
? view · edit Frequently asked questions
Q: Why isn't this article titled Ireland?
A: Many discussions have been had on this matter, and current consensus is to use Ireland to describe the island (which includes Northern Ireland) and the Republic of Ireland to describe the state. By order of the Arbitration Committee, all discussions from June 2009 to December 2023 of this article's title had to take place at a special project set up to deal with this issue. See Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Ireland-related articles for the manual of style for Ireland-related issues. From December 2023 discussions could take place on the article talk page as normal.
This page is written in Hiberno-English, which uses the same spelling as British English: colour, realise, travelled. Some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Former good article nomineeRepublic of Ireland was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 11, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 29, 2004, December 29, 2005, April 18, 2012, April 18, 2013, April 18, 2019, April 18, 2020, and April 18, 2022.
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconIreland Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCelts Top‑importance
WikiProject iconRepublic of Ireland is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCountries
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry
WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconIrish republicanism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish republicanism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish republicanism and Irish nationalism related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish republicanismWikipedia:WikiProject Irish republicanismTemplate:WikiProject Irish republicanismIrish republicanism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussions relating to the naming of Ireland articles can be found at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration and its archives
On 18 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Ireland. The result of the discussion was not moved.
Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21



This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Not the Republic of Ireland

The name of Ireland is simply Ireland and not the Republic of Ireland. One may refer to the official list of countries from the United Nations or to the websites of the government of Ireland which both indicate this 72.51.112.144 (talk) 16:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes everyone knows. However it's a natural disambiguator since the island is also called Ireland. There are very few country articles on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official names. Canterbury Tail talk 17:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Just have "Ireland" become "Ireland (Island)" why would anybody be looking for the island of Ireland instead of the Ireland country when they search Ireland? Yyythats5yzzz (talk) 21:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Its official description is "Republic of Ireland" which is used as natural disambiguation, see discussions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration. In contrast "Republic of France" isn't common usage and the country is primary which is why we don't use the official description for France. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, well noted. However unlike the use of "Republic of France", "Ireland" is by the far the most common name used for the state in everyday use, both nationally (Ireland) and internationally (Europe, US and further a field). This is clearly demonstrated in the name of state in Misplaced Pages pages in other languages, for example Irish, German, French, and Dutch. There is little argument for the continued use of the "Republic of Ireland", it has no legal basis or no basis in everyday use. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
@TomÓCiarraí: How do you distinguish between the island of Ireland, and the country of Ireland? You will see at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration which @Crouch, Swale referred to above, that there have been several long discussions previously about this, but never a WP:CONSENSUS to change the articles' names. Bazza 7 (talk) 09:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I know this has been discussed to death but surely putting the island to "Ireland (island)" and the country to "Ireland" would be the most accommodating arrangement? What are the cons? I think it makes sense that the country would take precedence over the geography (some examples I came up with: America points to USA not the continent, Austrailia points to the country not continent). D1551D3N7 (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Why not the island as "Ireland" and the country to "Ireland (state)"? The island is likely the primary usage considering its existence throughout history and not just 100 and a bit years. Canterbury Tail talk 20:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Age isn't the primary factor in which page should take precedence. Notice how America and Australia have existed as continents for millennia and yet the country takes precedence.
You are making an assumption when you say the island is the primary usage. I checked the page statistics here and while the island page is currently higher I reckon that's due to it currently being the primary as the patterns on both pages match up. This indicates to me that most views are expecting the country and clicking through to the country page rather than finding what they want on the island page (there is also the possibility of reading both pages).
As an Irish person I find it somewhat demeaning that you insist the island is the main page and relegate the country to being the secondary topic and clearly others feel this way also whereas moving the island page is generally inoffensive. D1551D3N7 (talk) 21:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Completely agree, that the country should take precedence over the island. More times than not when people refer to Ireland they are referring to the country not the island. As mentioned before this is not the case for Misplaced Pages in other languages, and the current setup in English is confusing to say the least. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Do you have evidence for that that takes into account thousands of years of historical record before the country was formed? A huge proportion of the world doesn't actually realise there's a difference between Ireland the country and Ireland the island, and most overseas interactions with Ireland on a personal level are regarding the island historically and not the modern political state. As an Irish person I find it somewhat demeaning that people want to sweep aside the history of the island and say that it's only the modern state that is the important topic. Canterbury Tail talk 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Cannot see how this is sweeping aside history. The modern country of Ireland is very much connected with its history, the country was not created in a vacuum. Struggling to see what your reason is to not call the country by its official name, and the name in which most people globally use (aside from the UK potentially). TomÓCiarraí (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
You're treating Ireland differently to all other countries though, we should treat them in the same manner either referring first to the Geographical landmass or the Nation, in which case many links Australia, Britain, America, South Africa and more would need to be changed to make this consistent. A large part of the reason people don't understand there's a difference is due to poor inconsistent sourcing like this where Ireland is often referred to as part of "The British Isles" or otherwise which leads people to not understand the Country is different to the Island and to the UK. Either way we should be keeping this consistent between all searches and countries. Galdrack (talk) 16:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
By that moniker the countries listed would also need to be changed. Galdrack (talk) 16:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi, generally in Ireland and internationally both officially and informally when referring to the country "Ireland" is used and when referring to the island "Island of Ireland" is used. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Actually I meant "French Republic" but in any case although that may be the long official descriptive name I've never heard it used while I've always heard Ireland, the country called "Republic of Ireland" which specifically stated as being the official description. The French constitution doesn't appear to specify the country's long official descriptive name but more importantly is common usage. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
There's a page on this at Names of the Irish state which is very detailed.
As you are British you will commonly be exposed to "Republic of Ireland" in usage as that's the name British law has chosen to use but for people living in Ireland and the rest of the world this is not the case. The name for the UN, EU, Council of Europe, IMF and OECD is "Ireland". The only place "Republic of Ireland" is used as a name is for the soccer team and also notably this Misplaced Pages page. Google for "Ireland" and "Republic of Ireland" and notice the difference in the results.
An "official description" is not a name, why are we supposed to use a description of the country as the title instead of its common and constitutional name?
Only Brits commonly use the "Republic of Ireland" due to Northern Ireland being a common part of their discourse (and need to disambiguate for politics, travel, business) but other countries internationally assume Ireland to be the country or don't have a need for disambiguation so often. Normally if people want to refer to NI they say NI, it's only in the UK that people would ever assume "Ireland" to mean "Northern Ireland" and thus need to disambiguate. D1551D3N7 (talk) 20:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, irish person here, I regularly use the term "Republic of Ireland". I find it useful to use the term to differentiate between the country & the island. 188.141.65.45 (talk) 18:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Also, the constitution calls the country "The Republic of Ireland". 188.141.65.45 (talk) 18:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't. Article 4 of Bunracht is pretty short and very clear.
"The name of the State is Éire, or, in the English language, Ireland." Cashew.wheel (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
The description of the country is separate to the name of the country. As per Article 4 of the Constitution, the name of the country in English is "Ireland". "Republic of Ireland" has no official status as a name. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
And not a single person here thinks otherwise. Canterbury Tail talk 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
You are indeed correct. Just wanted to ensure there was no equivalence given between description and official name. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 11:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)


Can I please ask those who are simply restating established facts, as if they are arguments, to realise that you're not going to "one and done" this discussion by doing so. It is acknowledged fact that Ireland is the name of the state (per the constitution). And that the Republic of Ireland is a description (per the Act). And that the island is also called Ireland (commonly and per the constitution). Etc. Simply restating these established facts (as a kind of "gotcha") is pointless. And does not address the issue that we cannot have two articles with the same title. Please argue your point on the basis of your proposal. And the relevant naming and disambiguation guidelines. For example, if you think that it should be "Ireland" and "Ireland (island)", then argue why the name of the state is (now) the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (over the island). Or, if you think it should be "Ireland (state)" and "Ireland", then argue why a clunky/Wikipedia-only parenthetical disambiguator is preferred over the common, natural language and officially recognised descriptor. To the extent that WP:NCDAB should be overlooked. Stating things like "the state is called Ireland ", or "Republic of Ireland is a description not the official name ", is about as useful in progressing this discussion as quoting Pi to 10 decimal places. Guliolopez (talk) 12:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Well noted. I would argue for the use of Ireland / Ireland (Island) over Ireland (Country) / Ireland, as the former is the primary use of the term. This is demonstrated by a Google search where the majority of results relate to the country not the island. The term for the island has limited use, namely the geographical use for the island and organisations that cover Ireland and Northern Ireland such as the Irish rugby team. All other uses relate to the country. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Its the official description of the state, isn't that the point? When disambiguation is needed as it is on Misplaced Pages the description is appropriate but when it isn't such as when linking the country in the infobox of Rathmullan it is piped as "Ireland". Per WP:NCDAB if there is a term which is commonly used it can be used for natural disambiguation which seems appropriate here. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
We are talking about a name not a description. They should not be equated. Officially the state should never be referred to as the Republic Ireland, hence this element of the 1948 act is irrelevant to this discussion on the name. As suggested the terms Ireland and Ireland (Island) should be used instead, given Ireland the country is the primary use of the term and not the island. Furthermore this overcomes the confusion between both terms. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 18:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
I would like to support Tom's recommendation (new account but please don't hold that against me) that the primary use of "Ireland" should refer to the country rather than the island. I've noted the discussion at this location and elsewhere that not all states are referred to by their official name in their URL, however, I would suggest Ireland is unique in being the only country on Misplaced Pages where its name is shared with a geographic feature and the geographic feature takes precedence. By way of example, the primary topic for Belize, Jordan, Moldova, Niger, Paraguay, Chad and Guinea all refer to the states rather than the geographic features that share their name, i.e. Belize River, Jordan River, Moldova River, Niger River, Paraguay River, Lake Chad and Gulf of Guinea respectively. I would suggest Ireland the state should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland and the island of Ireland should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland (island) or https://en.wikipedia.org/Island of Ireland. Most people in Ireland and Northern Ireland would use the phrase "Island of Ireland" if needing to make the distinction between the state and the island but I appreciate the URL is a touch unwieldy so the bracketed (island) version may be more appropriate. Moreover, I think, as Tom mentions, generally, throughout the world, the use of Ireland refers to the state; that's not to say in some contexts people wouldn't use Ireland to refer to the island but it's most definitely in the minority. Consider the use of Paraguay; if the primary Misplaced Pages topic was about the Paraguay River and it said (paraphrasing) "oh, you're looking for the state, that's over here", I think it would be considered odd, confusing and inconsistent. Using Republic of Ireland for the topic on the state named Ireland seems incorrect and a touch anachronistic when a more sensible and consistent solution is available. Jkelly789 (talk) 01:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Rivers and lakes are not a good example as most if not all rivers and lakes on Misplaced Pages take the form "Lake X" or "River X" and don't run in to the same problem as this article, there was never an intention to name the page "Paraguay River" as just "Paraguay". This is why I used the continents examples (Australia, America) which would be referred to in a way that conflicts with the country. Most island states seem to have just one article for both country and island from what I can find (even Cyprus where the island has occupied territory).
There is a counter-example where Micronesia is the geographical group and the state is at Federated States of Micronesia but this has differing factors in that it is a collection of islands and "Micronesia" contains islands than the just state D1551D3N7 (talk) 08:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Noted on the rivers, lakes and gulfs @D1551D3N7. I suppose the point was to supplement other examples mentioned including your references to Australia and America and highlight that Ireland is perhaps the only topic which refers to a geographic feature in the primacy over a state of the same name. I agree that the country should be at Ireland and the island should be at Ireland (island). 70.36.53.242 (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
@TomÓCiarraí Misplaced Pages doesn't determine article titles based on what something should and should not be called officially, but what is commonly used and practical to an article's specific situation. That's the same reason that Turkey is still the main article for the country whose government would say you should only officially call it "Türkiye".
As others have said, Wikipedians did know how each term was in use when the decision for the status quo was reached. If it's to be changed, there would need to be something new or not previously discussed. Jèrriais janne (talk) 16:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
As has been explained multiple times in the thread the current title is neither an official name or a common name which makes it different from examples like Turkey where Turkey is a common name for the country. To say this argument is the same as a "use official name" discussion is a misrepresentation. D1551D3N7 (talk) 16:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
I feel that 'Ireland (island)' is clunky whereas 'Republic of Ireland' is an elegant disambiguation. So I'm opposed to change. Dgp4004 (talk) 08:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
The discussion has moved on from the use of the Republic of Ireland as the name of the state, given this is not the official name and not the name in which most people refer to the country. The question is now which is the primary use of the term Ireland, the state or the island. From my viewpoint the answer is clearly the state. Any additional thoughts? TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
What references and evidence do you have that the state is the primary usage whenever people say Ireland? Canterbury Tail talk 11:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Firstly if you look at Google Trends for searches globally over the last 5 years searches related to Ireland and country or state, are consistently higher than searches related to Ireland and island. Notwithstanding this, many of the top searches for Ireland and Island relate to River Island, Love Island or the islands of Ireland (such as Achill). Which can be further discounted from the searches related to Ireland and Island.
Secondly, if you consider on a world or European stage, Ireland refers to the country not the island. For example: IMF, OECD, EU, European Council and UN. This is also reflected in non governmental organisations such as the International Energy Agency, European Broadcasting Union, World Medical Association, International Committee of the Red Cross, and the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies to name but a few. There are limited organisations that refer to the island like rugby and hockey.
Therefore, the evidence is clear that Ireland primarily refers to the country not the island. If you believe otherwise please put forward the evidence. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, what evidence would that be, exactly? You're just stating things, and claiming they're facts. They're not. If you're doing some sort of WP:GHITS research, then share your links to your results. I'd love to see what search terms you're using that are bringing in "Love Island" and "River Island" as bona fide results for a search presumably using keywords along the lines of "Island of Ireland" or some variation thereof! Bastun 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I've yet to see any clear evidence that the island is the primary usage either, just it's longer history. Alas given the status quo, the burden of proof appears to fall on those wanting change.
My position is that using disambiguating parentheses is preferential as the current situation simply perpetuates the fallacy that the name of the country is "Republic Of Ireland" (both on Misplaced Pages and other sites that source their data from the wiki, an often overlooked side effect).
I'm sure long term editors are jaded by this topic arising every few months both here and historically at WT:IECOLL, but I would ask this; if the names of the pages were to change, do you think there would be as much demand to revert to "Republic of" as there was to remove it? Cashew.wheel (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm aware that 'Republic of Ireland' is not the name of the state. It is, however, the name of the Misplaced Pages page and I don't support changing to either 'Ireland (island)' or 'Ireland (state)'. 'Republic of Ireland' is fine in my view. Dgp4004 (talk) 11:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
That's a bit of a circular argument, this discussion is about the name of the Misplaced Pages page. If you feel the name of the page should be the Republic of Ireland, please put forward the reasons why. The evidence is pretty clear, globally Ireland is the name used both officially and colloquially by most organisations and people (see previous comments). The only exception to this is in the UK, in which Republic of Ireland is used frequently. That said the British Government officially refers to the country as Ireland not the Republic of Ireland.
Finally, I do think that wishes of the country regarding its naming should be respected. It's not a name that is disputed like North Macedonia. To disregard the correct and preferred name is insensitive. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
"The wishes of the country" is a bit of a stretch, Tom. There are very few countries on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official name. Bastun 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I think this argument that other countries aren't at their official names is flawed. In Ireland's case both the official and commonly used name are the same. All the examples people give are at the name people commonly use to refer to the country (France, Libya, Mexico, Vatican City, United Kingdom are the examples cited before) and are thus uncontroversial (I couldn't find any discussions trying to use the official names) but here we have a title that is both not the common or official name as the title. D1551D3N7 (talk) 12:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
"To disregard the correct and preferred name is insensitive" "I do think that wishes of the country regarding its naming should be respected" I am irish, and I prefer the current name. So, you claiming that the wishes of the country are to be respected is just like a child on a playground saying "Call him stinkface, he told me to." 188.141.65.45 (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't want to be mean, just that's the best thing I could come up with. 188.141.65.45 (talk) 10:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm also opposed to this change. Contrary to what is being said about primary topic, when I google "Ireland": https://www.google.com/search?q=ireland+-wikipedia, only six of the top twenty hits relate to the republic. The rest relate to all-Ireland, the island or Northern Ireland. DrKay (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
This is anecdotal evidence, as your Google search is heavily influenced by your search history and location. My Google search returns much more website revering to the country not island. That's why I referenced Google Trends data in my previous comment. There are much more Google searches linked to the country/state than island globally over last 5 years (max time period). TomÓCiarraí (talk) 15:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
This is anecdote, Tom, as you haven't presented any evidence. Bastun 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
If your argument is that people looking for the state are getting lost, that's an argument for making 'Ireland' a disambiguation page like Britain surely? Then they can choose the state or the island from there.
But most of the arguments put forward seem more about emotion / nationhood which is not a good basis on which to make the change. Dgp4004 (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Apologies, if my previous comment was not clear. The Google Trends data relates to the number of search results not searches. There are more search results for Ireland that include country or state than island. I also mentioned most organisations globally refer to Ireland as the country not the island. It is incorrect to call these emotional arguments, if you have other evidence or arguments to contrary, please put them forward. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Also anecdotally of course (from a stateless browser in Canada), excluding Misplaced Pages, the top results I receive for a Google search for are:
- Tourism Ireland (ireland.com, all-island - weren't the Irish Times generous to give up this domain name!)
- Failte Ireland (discoverireland.ie, Ireland)
- Brittanica (britannica.com, Ireland)
- Irish Government (gov.ie, Ireland)
- Education in Ireland (educationinireland.com, Ireland)
- Department of Foreign Affairs (ireland.ie, Ireland)
- National Geographic Kids (kids.nationalgeographic.com, Ireland)
- National Gallery of Ireland (nationalgallery.ie, Ireland)
- Department of Foreign Affairs (dfa.ie, Ireland)
- The Irish Times (irishtimes.com, Ireland)
So, 9 out of 10 refer to the state rather than the island. Tourism Ireland is the only all-island result (again, for me, in Canada) in the top 10. Tourism Ireland is of course based in Ireland but promotes the entire island post Good Friday Agreement. Searches conducted from Ireland and the UK will likely not reflect what most of the world sees. Jkelly789 (talk) 23:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Contrary to what is being claimed here, google trends demonstrates more worldwide searches for the island rather than the country: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%201-d&q=%2Fm%2F03rt9,%2Fm%2F012wgb&hl=en-US. DrKay (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
I don't think there's any information to be extracted from that page, its unclear exactly how they determine which is which. All the related queries for both refer to the country and the graph is almost the exact same as well, the difference is minor D1551D3N7 (talk) 19:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
The link you shared does not fully work and the time period you searched is the past day. See below the link for worldwide results from 2004 to today for "Ireland Country + Ireland State" versus "Ireland Island. Both Country and State are used as both are relevant words, the "+" acts as an or. As you can see Country/State is always higher than Island for the whole period since 2004. Additionally the top 3 results for Island relate to River Island so the island results can be discounted even further.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?hl=en-GB&tz=-180&date=all&q=Ireland+island,Ireland+country+%2B+Ireland+state&sni=6 TomÓCiarraí (talk) 05:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
That's a completely flawed methodology. You are ignoring that (I would imagine) for the vast majority of people putting "Ireland" into a search engine, we simply don't know whether they are looking for the state, or the island. The fact that "River Island" is a top result would suggest that Google Trends' results and algorithms have been as subject to enshittification as the rest of Google. Bastun 09:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I am afraid you don't understand how Google Trends data works. It shows how many results contain "Ireland" and "Island", in any order. This is not how many people searched these terms. The top results for these terms indicate the top searches that included terms "Ireland" and "Island" in search results. In this case the top 3 searches were related to retail chain River Island, which for this discussion whether "Ireland" primary usage is the island or the country is irrelevant. These results are made up of people searching for River Island (mostly likely in Ireland) and getting the terms Ireland and island included in their results. Hence based on Google search results there are much more results related to the country than the island. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
The top 5 searches for "Ireland country + Ireland state" relate to country code and Northern Ireland. That is no more relevant than River Island. The data and your claims about it are unconvincing. DrKay (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
The top search is "country of Ireland", 3 of the other top 5 searches relate to country code which likely refers to the phone country code (+353), and 1 of the the top 5 results relate to NI. Hence the majority of the top 5 searches relating to "country" are relevant while the majority of the top 5 island searches are irrelevant (i.e. River Island). TomÓCiarraí (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

The articles are fine at their current respective homes. In my opinion, as a disambiguator is needed, the natural one is the state's official description. Most states on WP do not have articles at their official name - it's really no biggie. No offense is intended. The vast majority don't take any. (The decision to stop using WP:IECOLL may well have been premature...) Bastun 09:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Please put forward evidence why you think the island is the primary use of the term Ireland, not the country. I have put forward evidence above based on Google Trends data and how the vast majority of organisations (in all fields: government, arts, medicine, charity etc) globally refer to the country not the island when they use the term Ireland. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop referring to the description as per the 1948 Act, you are misunderstanding its use. It should be never used as a name. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
For the record: I would support 'Ireland' for the country name and 'Ireland (island)' for the geographical page. This brings it into line with usage elsewhere, as covered well enough above. I am concerned that Wiki is perpetuating the common misconception that 'Ireland' is the island. As a young Brit whose Dad served in the British Army in Belfast back in the Troubles, I recollect the passionate view at the time that the Republic should not be permitted to appropriate the formerly British-owned term, 'Ireland', and for a while it was Eire. I now feel that the colonial view of Ireland is carried on by Wiki these days and that we should all move on. The name of a country should be what its inhabitants say it is. There was a referendum, we Brits lost. Time we accepted that. Ex nihil 10:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
"the common misconception that 'Ireland' is the island." Um... Ireland is the island. It doesn't have another name. (And one day, the state will also share the same territory). Bastun 12:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop telling me what to do. I am misunderstanding nothing, including how Google Trends works. As I stated, your premise - "Ireland+island,Ireland+country+%2B+Ireland+state" - is flawed from the get-go. Now, we've both had our say. Let's not bludgeon the process, and listen to some other opinions. Bastun 10:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I agree @Bastun that a disambiguator is needed but in my opinion, Ireland (island) is a better solution than using the description and not the common, and indeed official, name of the country, Ireland, when referencing the state. You state that most articles do not appear at their official name but almost none appear at their full description, e.g. there don't seem to be topics on "Federal Republic of Germany", "The Commonwealth of Australia", "The Kingdom of the Netherlands" or "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"; presumably because it's unwieldy and these states are not commonly known by their full descriptions. @D1551D3N7 raises this point elsewhere that Ireland seems to be somewhat unique in that neither the common nor official name is in use. Referring to the state as Republic of Ireland is not incorrect but refusing to refer to the state as Ireland has deep political connotations, specifically, many UK governments refused to use the term Ireland until post-Good Friday Agreement some 40 years after the name was adopted and Sinn Féin still refuse to use the term, i.e. a refusal to refer to the state correctly as Ireland is particularly common, although not exclusively, amongst the more extreme political ideologies of the Irish left and the British right. Jkelly789 (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

How about modifying the first sentence to clarify the name per the article text:

Ireland (English) and Irish: Éire are the official names of the country also officially described as Republic of Ireland (Poblacht na hÉireann),, a country in north-western Europe...

Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 14:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 18 August 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is a clear consensus against moving. (non-admin closure) Un assiolo (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)


Republic of IrelandIreland – This is technically a request for two moves: Republic of Ireland to Ireland and merging the current Ireland article into Geography of Ireland (or temporarily moving it to Ireland (island)). I'm uncertain if this discussion would be better suited to a broader project talk page, which is why I'm making this proposal here. I am aware of the discussion, that decided to leave the articles on their current titles, but that was simply 15 years ago and there are good reasons for both moving and keeping. However, from what I can see, the reasons to move both articles seem to be predominant. Given the frequency of discussions, it is clear that many editors have made significant efforts on various talk pages to move this article, challenging the incorrect assumption by some editors that there is no reason to believe consensus could have changed over the past decade and a half.

"Republic of Ireland" is neither an official term nor is it common, except in Ireland itself and parts of the UK, thus eliminating it as an option. According to the UN. the official English name of the country is, as pointed out by other editors, simply "Ireland". On Misplaced Pages, we either use the short forms for countries (United Kingdom, Mexico, Russia, or Brazil) or we use the official name if it is already a single and concise term (Canada, Belize, Japan, Hungary). It is clear that this situation falls into the latter category, which also aligns with WP:CONCISE.

To avoid the use of parentheses, as seen in Georgia (country), we need to move the article about the island. Taking a glimpse at other island countries like Taiwan or Cyprus, which also occupy their respective short forms, it appears that "Geography of ..." is the established form to describe the underlying island on which the country is located (Geography of Taiwan, Geography of Cyprus). Since Ireland redundantly addresses the politics of its constituent countries—topics that are already covered in their respective articles—I suggest merging it with Geography of Ireland by removing all sections that go beyond the island of Ireland as their subject matter and incorporating all remaining subtopics, such as geological history, into the article Geography of Ireland. Any disambiguation pages don't have to be changed. –Tobias (talk) 13:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I agree with this suggestion for the most part. My only addition would be that some content might also have to be moved to History of Ireland Cashew.wheel (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
That is a good point, not all information are suitable for just the geography. –Tobias (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
  • What evidence is there that the country of Ireland, a state that has existed for just over 100 years and doesn't occupy all of the island, is the primary subject here instead of the island? Why can't the country be at Ireland (country) and leave the island at Ireland? Is there evidence that when people say Ireland they're genuinely talking about the country and not the island and what exists in it, and not mixing the two up as is very commonplace? Canterbury Tail talk 15:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    This is a good counterproposal, and I support this as Option B. Killuminator (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    There is no hard evidence because we don't have access to all statistics, but there are indicators. For example, let's consider the average monthly page views of countries versus their respective islands in the cases of Taiwan and Cyprus according to the page view statistics: Taiwan (~ 420.000 views) vs Geography of Taiwan (~ 13.000 views) and Cyprus (~ 230.000 views) and Geography of Cyprus (~ 10.000 views). This suggests that states are far more searched for than the islands they occupy and I don't see a reason why this should be different for Ireland. In Ireland (~ 260.000 views) and Republic of Ireland (~ 200.000 views), Ireland's views are overall slightly higher than those of the Republic of Ireland.
    Since we don't have access to referral sources, we can't say anything for sure, but given the numbers, we can assume that a vast majority of the Republic of Ireland's views originate from the disambiguation hatnote on the Ireland page. People likely enter "Ireland" in the search bar as nobody initially searches for "Republic of Ireland", are directed to the article about the island, realise the article isn't about the state, and then click on the link in the lead to reach the country’s page. This would fit the difference of around 60.000 views with most likely a few visitors that closed the tab after reaching the article of the island.
    Given the lack of complete clarity, I would suggest aligning this case with similar topics like those mentioned earlier: Cyprus or Taiwan as well as Madagascar or Iceland. These all follow the pattern where the state is the main article, with an article about the island under "Geography of...".
    I don't entirely disagree with your suggestion to move it to Ireland (country), but I think the parentheses can be avoided here, and it would be better to do so if possible. –Tobias (talk) 18:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    That is just WP:OR and as we all know, Misplaced Pages cannot be used as a reference and that includes page hits. It's pure supposition that that's what's happening. Canterbury Tail talk 22:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    OR requires unproven page content and does not include page hits as a statistical and automated process to be recorded, regardless of the source. The numbers from Misplaced Pages align with external search and book statistics, making it unlikely for the hypothesis to be completely incorrect. However, since we are discussing an assumption, I have written a few other paragraphs in case you did not notice. –Tobias (talk) 06:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Oppose per WP:DABCONCEPT, WP:COMMONNAME (including WP:NATURAL) and per WP:SED (which I wrote years ago, in terms of the merger of the island article). As has previously been discussed "Republic of Ireland" is an official description and is in common usage unlike say United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Georgia isn't comparable becauase the long name may not be official or at least isn't common usage, see Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested move 10 April 2024. Cyprus and Taiwan aren't comparable as in those cases the countries cover similar areas to the islands which isn't the case for Ireland where Northern Ireland covers a significant amount of the area and population. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    Oh, Georgia isn't only comparable, but rather nearly the identical issue, a country without a long official form, only difference is that there is no made-up name that is used as an article title and there is a U.S. state with the same name. The discussion you mentioned supports my point, I'm just wondering why you think that this is any different than in this case. The idea of moving Georgia to a made-up name was vastly rejected. Here, we got the identical situation in reverse, with a made-up name already applied and my idea is to move it back to it's real, official, and more common name. I opened the discussion with those very guidelines you mentioned. WP:NATURAL requires a name that is not made-up, "Republic of Ireland" is a made-up name as it isn't broadly accepted (remember, globally, not only within the UK and Ireland) and not the official name either if we stick to the UN, which is probably the best way to determine, whether a term for a state is official or not. In this case, it is definitly not official unless you can not offer clear evidence for the claim that it is. WP:COMMONNAME contradicts your reasoning as well; "Ireland" is way more common than "Republic of Ireland", throughout the article as well as outside of Misplaced Pages, and by "way more", I mean more than fifty times as much.
    When you say that Cyprus isn't comparable, I just got one question for you: have you ever looked at a map of Cyprus showing the area of Northern Cyprus? This is exactly the same, we got two different states on one island; "Northern (island name)" on one hand and just "(island name)" on the other. Otherwise, I don't understand why this should be different; maybe you can explain this idea a little further? –Tobias (talk) 18:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    Except that Republic of Ireland is not a made up name, it's in fact an official descriptor of the country. The constitution of the country gave us a natural disambiguator. And Republic of Ireland is indeed used, just ask the football team. And it's in use by the government of Ireland as a simple search across the government websites shows. It's not some made up term that is only used by the British or some such. Canterbury Tail talk 22:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    Need I remind you that it was FIFA that imposed that name on the Football Association of Ireland team in 1953? Cashew.wheel (talk) 07:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
    You needn't, because we're not talking about the football team, we're talking about the island, and the state, which our government said could be officially described as 'the Republic of Ireland', in the Republic of Ireland Act, 1948. Bastun 10:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
    Are you really asking me to consult the local football team while simultaneously claiming, without any statistical indicator, that it was common outside the UK and Ireland? –Tobias (talk) 07:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
    "Republic of Ireland" is not tue common name. Globally "Ireland" is the common name for the country. Cashew.wheel (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Oppose for the reasons I have stated every other time this has come up: in brief summary, the status quo works because 1) "Optimising for readers over editors" precludes use of artificial construct disambiguators such as Ireland (state), Ireland (island). 2) The island of Ireland is known as - well, "Ireland". In the English language, it does not have any alternative common name or description. WP:COMMONNAME can therefore be claimed by the article on the island. 3) Using "Republic of Ireland" for the state doesn't allow the state to reside at a page called by its official name - but so what? There are literally dozens of country articles in the Wiki not on the official name of their state. 4) Not only has there never been a consensus to move Republic of Ireland to Ireland, there is demonstrable consensus to retain the status quo. That's visible in the many, many polls taken prior to the 2009 poll, and in the ones since. My country's article isn't at its official name? So what. There are 205 articles on individual sovereign states on Misplaced Pages. Only 30 of them are at their official name. The status quo works. Tobias is, with the best will in the world, proposing a whole heap of work, for many editors, that ultimately doesn't benefit the reader. Bastun 19:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    Not really a consensus, just more seasoned editors shoot it down each time. Just because it's the status quo doesn't make it correct, otherwise this topic wouldn't get restarted monthly.Cashew.wheel (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    Yes, a consensus, really. Click on the link in my post. Scroll down a bit. Read the poll results. I've done that work, you can do the rest - all the ones since, up until last year, should be on the WP:IECOLL talk page. It's absolutely not "just more seasoned editors shooting it down each time." It is, quite often, more seasoned editors saying "Here's why the status quo works, but sure, consensus can change, do you have any new arguments?" - and there aren't any. Bastun 19:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    Oh, I've read it all. And I've seen that "consensus can change" line many time. Cashew.wheel (talk) 20:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    Since I already answered most of this points in this discussion, I'll keep it short: short forms are no official names, but no made-up names either, so absolutely valid to use in terms of concision - "Republic of Ireland" is neither concise nor legally existing at all.
    There is a alternative to "Ireland", actually two: "Ireland (island)" and "Geography of Ireland". Both of them are common on WP with the latter option being predominantly used. –Tobias (talk) 20:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
    Wait, what now? 'Republic of Ireland is neither concise nor legally existing at all.', where's that coming from? I refer you to the Republic of Ireland Act. 'Republic of Ireland' is the official, legal description of the state. Which you would know if you'd read the articles in question, or the previous move debates. As a relatively inexperienced editor, editing outside your normal areas of interest, I'd suggest doing your research before making proposals from a position of ignorance, especially in controversial areas. Bastun 09:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
    What don't you understand about the difference between an official description and an official name? We're not seeking a description of the state's cultural or political identity, but rather an internationally recognised official term that aligns with UN records. According to them, this is not the official name and therefore legally nonexistent, regardless of the country declaring it its official description. And before you want to use that as an argument: yes, the UN also acknowledge short forms like "Poland" instead of "Republic of Poland", this is no deviation of an official form. –Tobias (talk) 07:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
    Let me express this in words of no more than twothree syllables. We passed a law that states the country's official description. That makes it legal. A UN style guide doesn't negate or override that. Bastun 13:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
    That still doesn't make a description a name. –Tobias (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
    But Ireland isn't about the geography of the island. The section on the union with Britain is longer than the entire geography section. Traumnovelle (talk) 08:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
    It is about the physical island, not a state on it. That's why economy, culture, and politics are misplaced here—they belong in the articles of the respective states, meaning this article and Northern Ireland. –Tobias (talk) 13:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose - "Republic of Ireland" is an official term, while it is not the name of the state, it is the "official description" of the state. That being said, we don't use official names here simply because they're official. Merging the existing Ireland article into Geography of Ireland is simply a non-starter as there is far more content in the former article than just about the island's geography. To have the country at the basename it would have to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, which is impossible to prove considering we have no way of determining whether searches for Ireland are for the country or the whole island. And yes, therein I could see an argument for a WP:NOPRIMARY with the basename as a dab and the two articles existing as Ireland (country)/Republic of Ireland and Ireland (island), but the whole island has the long-term significance (PT2) by default imo, and unless PT1 can be proven to favor the country, I see no reason to change the existing arrangement. estar8806 (talk) 02:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
There is a method to evaluate WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, switch to a disambiguation page for a set period of time, after which the traffic to each can be evaluated to determine which topic readers are actually looking for. Cashew.wheel (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose long term significance goes to the island itself. The Kingdom of Ireland has just as much a claim to primacy, if not a greater one, than the modern Irish republic. Traumnovelle (talk) 05:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The current arrangement is sensible. The name "Republic of Ireland" is well-known and frequently used to distinguish the country from the broader island. 2401:7000:CAD3:BB00:6C10:7147:5254:CEE5 (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment I couldn't help notice that the proposer recently flagged what they identified as problems on another article, and when asked to help with the cleanup they proposed, they responded with Great to hear that. I would love to help, but I currently don't have the time or motivation to rewrite the entire page. 🙄 Bastun 10:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and ... what now? That has absolutely nothing to do with this and maintenance hatnotes exist to point out specific flaws until they are addressed, they to not obligate the flagger to participate in the correction, if that is what you're trying to say. –Tobias (talk) 05:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Oppose. While the country is indeed commonly known as Ireland, it is not primary over the island. And it is also very commonly known as the Republic of Ireland or simply "the Republic", so the current title is very good natural disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:39, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose: Oh no, not again! Oppose per previously reasons I've given in several other discussions as well as all the reasons given by other editors above, so there is no need to repeat them all here. Moving this to Geography of Ireland is just not thinking what that article is actually about. This is a dead topic, just leave it be, it works as it is. ww2censor (talk) 10:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Merge Republic of Ireland into Ireland. The proposed move doesn't really work because the Ireland article is about much more than geography- it's also about the culture and the nation in general- but thinking about it, there are issues with the current status quo. Ireland#Culture and Republic of Ireland#Culture are largely duplicates for instance; if people seeking information about the government as well as general culture of Ireland come across this article or the other one, the information will inevitably be split. The scope of Ireland also isn't clear- the article currently starts with "Ireland is an island" but the article clearly covers the whole of the 32 counties, including small offshore islands. I don't think it's impossible to combine the articles in an easily-understandable way, whilst being clear that the sovereign state does not have sovereignty over the whole of Ireland. Chessrat 22:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
    Strong disagree. There's a clear distinction between the island that has been populated for millennia and the modern country that has only existed since 1922. It's also perfectly common for there to be some duplication of information across articles about related topics. Besides, equating the Republic of Ireland with the island of Ireland would be walking into a political minefield. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 05:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    No one is suggesting equating the country of Ireland with the island of Ireland, just using it's official and WP:COMMONNAME for the countries article.
    @Chessrat makes a point others have made before, the Ireland article is nebulous and isn't distinct. The content of the article is not limited in scope to the island of Ireland but rather the nation as an abstract concept, covering it's geography, history & politics etc. Cashew.wheel (talk) 09:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    But you can talk about the geography, history, and politics of the whole island in a way distinct from those of the Republic of Ireland specifically. Besides, "Republic of Ireland" is a common name and an official one under the Republic of Ireland Act 1948. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    No, it is not an official name, just an official description, and it is not commonly used outside of the British Isles. The history of Ireland inevitably overlaps with the history of this article, as does its politics and demographics, since the country occupies the majority of the island's area. Everything else is included in Northern Ireland. –Tobias (talk) 11:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    "it is not an official name, just an official description" That sounds like a distinction without a difference.
    "it is not commonly used outside of the British Isles" Yes it is. I live outside the British Isles, and I use it.
    2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 11:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    There is a difference between a personal experience and a statistical fact. Those facts clearly show only a small peak in frequency within the British Isles, primarily in Ireland itself, with no indication of common usage outside Britain whatsoever. The difference between an official name and a description is that an official name is internationally accepted and recorded in UN files. A description is nothing more than a national designation used to display the form of government or cultural identity and has no international significance at all. –Tobias (talk) 12:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    Those data actually show usage of the term "Republic of Ireland" outside the British Isles. They support my position, not yours. The rest of your comment is hair-splitting. The fact remains that Dublin itself has endorsed the term "Republic of Ireland" in Irish legislation. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 12:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    No, 'Republic of Ireland' remains unofficial as a name, according to the UN and the Irish constitution, and is uncommon as we clarified several times above. Of course, every term is used everywhere at some point, even Russian Хлеб in Spain, but the usage outside the British islands is absolutely insignificant in comparison. You're just trying to distort clear facts to fit your opinion. –Tobias (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    You keep repeating this, and you continue to be wrong. As previously pointed out to you, the Republic of Ireland Act of 1948, passed by the Oireachtas and signed into law, designates "Republic of Ireland as the official description of the state. What the UN says in a style guide is neither here nor there. Please desist from continuing to spread misinformation. Bastun 14:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    Article 4 of the Constitution of Ireland couldn't be clearer, the name of the country, in English, is "Ireland". That's an indisputable fact.
    If anyone is spreading misinformation it's Misplaced Pages, as by maintaining the status quo it perpetuates fallacy that the name of the country is the "Republic of Ireland".
    This debate does not exist anywhere else as every country, official body (except for FIFA) and reference work accepts that the name of the country is "Ireland". Cashew.wheel (talk) 15:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    I don't really see anyone making the claim that Republic of Ireland is actually the official name (or a name) of the country, only that it's the official description and is therefore a useful natural disambiguator for uses of the word Ireland. We all know the name of the country in English is Ireland, that's not in dispute. However, as has been shown, even the Irish government uses the term Republic of Ireland in documentation etc. to refer to the country when a disambiguator is required while also talking about the island of Ireland. When the government of the country in question sometimes uses the term for such purposes, who are we to argue against that? People seem to operate under the clearly false impression that the term isn't used inside the country, when it is. Canterbury Tail talk 15:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    100% agree, the name of "Ireland" and description as "Republic of Ireland" are facts of law and shouldn't be up for debate. (Despite a number of contributions to the contrary)
    I'll maintain a description is not a name, but more importantly I have yet to find another other reference work or list of countries maintained by an official body (except for FIFA) that use the prefix "Republic of". Misplaced Pages is the outlier. The overwhelming evidence shows that "Ireland" is the WP:COMMONNAME used the world over, while opposition to moving the article is based on reluctance change and ... vibes. Cashew.wheel (talk) 15:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    "Republic Of Ireland" is the common name of the soccer team, "Ireland" is the common name of the country, island and Kim Basinger's daughter.
    The name of the country is very clear, it is literally Article 4 of the constitution and is the accepted common name by every international organisation (UN, EU, World Bank, UK Government). Alongside Misplaced Pages, the BBC is one of the few sources that commonly doesn't use the official name due to their editorial guidelines. Cashew.wheel (talk) 11:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    It's obvious that we're going in circles here, so I'm just going to note that this proposal has yielded a clear majority in favour of the status quo. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 12:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Oppose. The discussion here keeps revolving around official name, but that is not the reason for the current article title or a valid reason to change it. DrKay (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Moral support. This is likely to fail, but I'm somewhat surprised by the strong opposition to the move. "Ireland" is the common name for the country, and most if not all sources refer to it solely as that. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    The problem is, that's not the only thing reliable sources refer to as Ireland. The Irish Potato Famine, for example, happened in Ireland significantly before Ireland became a country. There's a whole lot of history that happened in Ireland before 1922/1937.--130.111.220.19 (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
    Every historical period has its own designation. In the case of the Great Famine, it occurred during a time when the country was referred to as Ireland. While it is possible to refer to the geographical area of any past event, this approach is often imprecise, even though I agree that this does not pertain to the modern-day state of Ireland. However, if no distinct name exists for a specific period, History of Ireland would be the preferred option rather than referring solely to the island itself. Short forms are used to describe modern-day countries on Misplaced Pages, even when significant historical periods might be more prominent than the current state (e.g. Russia, Japan, and England refer to the modern-day countries rather than the Russian Empire, Empire of Japan, or Kingdom of England, let alone the islands or geographical regions they once occupied). Short forms tend to encompass the entire history of a particular area (e.g. Cyprus, Taiwan, or Japan). However, if there is a risk of confusion, disambiguation hatnotes can resolve the issue, as they currently do. –Tobias (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Oppose because it's been discussed many times and no new arguments have been made. Seems this is the least bad way to do things. This problem is likely to disappear in the next few years with Irish reunification so it's especially not worth getting exercised about. John (talk) 13:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Support per the 1919 Dáil 😉 SerialNumber54129 18:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment - How can the page be moved, when we already have an article named Ireland, for the island? You have to have an RM for both articles, not just for the country. GoodDay (talk) 15:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
    That's the reason why I addressed it in the proposal. –Tobias (talk) 19:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
    The island article would have to be changed to "Ireland (island)". Anyways, I don't see either article being moved, anytime soon. GoodDay (talk) 19:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

WP:IECOLL

Time to revisit the decision to abandon the requirement that all naming debates related to Ireland no longer have to take place at WP:IECOLL? The last was very poorly advertised (I think only on the WP:IECOLL page itself, and it wasn't even flagged on the Wikiproject Ireland?) and drew only three participants - one of whom was the proposer - and one additional comment, not counting Arbcom members. Bastun 12:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I honestly don't think it matters where it takes place, it'll happen and continue to happen. The location doesn't change it. I do wonder if it shouldn't be classed as a contentious topic that requires A) logged in and B) extended-confirmed status to stop the drive by IP initiated or SPA discussions and keep the inevitable future discussions to hopefully editors who are a bit more invested, likely to have an actual conversation, and less likely to go off on emotional tirades like we've seen many times in the past. The topic will be discussed, and as long as it's civilised that's fine. It doesn't quite come under The Troubles banner. I don't think location is important. Canterbury Tail talk 16:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
I was thinking a centralised discussion might at least make it easier to maintain the template listing all past debates... Bastun 20:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
That is a good point. Canterbury Tail talk 15:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
IMHO, WP:IECOLL should be retired. GoodDay (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Do you base that on anything? Bastun 20:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Should "Irish Republic" redirect here?

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

With this move, BRMSF moved Irish Republic to Irish Republic (unrecognised state) and recreated it as a redirect to Republic of Ireland. I don't know enough about the topic to question their argument (Almost all uses of the term "Irish Republic" outside of certain ideological or historical contexts refer to the recognized post-1949 state, not to the historic unrecognized state) but it is not obviously an uncontroversial move and maybe it should have been discussed first? I'll leave to editors more expert on the topic than I am to judge. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 13:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi. RE:
  • "not an uncontroversial move". I'm inclined to agree. Personally, per WP:BOLDMOVE, given that there had previously been a (somewhat contentious and unsuccessful) discussion to move that title to Irish Republic (1919–1922), I don't think that title should have been moved and retargeted as it was. Without any discussion at all. Either here. Or at Talk:Irish Republic. (And, in all honesty, given previous arbitration and ANI engagements (including notice on 1RR and "The Troubles") involving BRMSF, that editor should perhaps have considered opening a thread regardless.)
  • "redirect to Republic of Ireland". I personally don't think the title should be a direct redirect to this title. Even if there was/is consensus that the article (previously at Irish Republic) should be moved/retitled, at the very least it should be a DAB page. And not a straight redirect.
Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 13:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
In keeping with WP:RMUM, I requested that the undiscussed move be undone. And it has. If BRMSF wishes to open a move discussion thread (to confirm whether there's consensus for a move, whether/what the "new" title should be and whether/what should be done with the "old" title), then Talk:Irish Republic is the place to open such a discussion thread. Guliolopez (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
My contention is that this was uncontroversial as the state was never given recognition by any other state (save for Soviet Russia, which also had no recognition) - the idea that a defunct unrecognized state which ceased to exist over a century ago should have precedence over a recognized state which is widely referred to by the same title is somewhat strange. For example Italian Republic redirects to Italy, not to Italian Republic (Napoleonic). BRMSF (talk) 16:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Per Misplaced Pages:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves, a move is always controversial if "there has been any past debate about the best title for the page." There has been past debate: Talk:Irish Republic#Requested move. It is therefore controversial and should only be moved via the process for controversial moves. DrKay (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi BRMSF. RE:
  • "contention is that this was uncontroversial". Please read WP:BOLDMOVE. As noted by DrKay above, and per Misplaced Pages convention (as opposed, perhaps, than your own interpretation of "uncontroversial") an undiscussed move should only occur if there "has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title". As there had been a previous discussion (in which objections were raised), it wasn't eligible for a bold/uncontroversial move. Regardless of whether the proposed/new title was the same as that discussed before.
  • "idea that a defunct unrecognized state should have precedence over a recognized state". If you feel the title should be moved, please open a thread (with your proposal/rationale/arguments/etc) at Talk:Irish Republic. Not here.
Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Article title

The official name of the country is Ireland, not the "Republic of Ireland". Why can't we just move the title to "Ireland" and move the current article Ireland to "Ireland (island)"? 2001:8003:9100:2C01:D571:F7D9:C6E0:D9E7 (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

See Talk:Republic of Ireland/FAQ. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:25, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: