| Revision as of 18:49, 29 May 2009 editScientizzle (talk | contribs)27,904 edits mostly "off"← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:14, 29 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,381 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Scientizzle/Archive 8) (bot |
| (951 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{not around|3=9 July 2014}} |
| ⚫ |
{{Off and On WikiBreak}}{{administrator}}{{User:Scientizzle/talk page header}} |
|
|
|
{{busy}} |
|
⚫ |
{{administrator}}{{User:Scientizzle/talk page header}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|counter = 6 |
|
|counter = 8 |
|
|algo = old(7d) |
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|archive = User talk:Scientizzle/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = User talk:Scientizzle/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
== Help improving PatientsLikeMe please! == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. We're into the last five days of the ]. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! |
|
Hi there, I work for ] and so want to avoid any conflict of interest by doing substantial edits to the article. However since it first went up we have published several research studies and been mentioned in a variety of journals including Lancet Neurology, Nature Medicine, AMIA, etc (see http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=patientslikeme). I would be most grateful to have some additional input to the article from objective 3rd parties. Happy to answer any questions at pwicks@patientslikeme.com, I'm also easily Googlable! Thanks,--] (]) 16:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=WiR_list_2&oldid=812113507 --> |
|
|
== Nomination of ] for deletion == |
|
|
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|
|
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|
== Shamwow86 (Creamy3) == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
|
Hi, Scientizzle. I wanted to let know that I support and at SPI. I brought up the sockpuppetry case, not simply because he was obviously Creamy3, but because he was starting to engage in deceptive behavior again. (Being deceitful about his past, his contributions, canvassing, being dishonest when directly questioned, etc. etc.). Like you, I think that many of his contributions to article space have been good, especially dealing with lesser known films and personalities. And if he ever could learn to stop the MySpacey junk, the sockpuppetry and the other immature behavior, then he could be a benefit WP. In other words, if he grew up and treated the project work seriously, I would also approve of giving him a fresh start. Unfortunately, the creation of his latest sock yesterday - does sound - just so he could shows he doesn't get it yet. Unfortunately. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — ] ]</span> 10:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 14:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
:Interesting. I was going to point out that per this , and subject matter edited, that ] seems to be our boy. I was going to say that if he was behaving that despite the block evasion perhaps we could watch and give him a chance, but unfortunately it looks like he is socking again. ] (]) 23:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
== Nomination for deletion of ] == |
|
::P.S. I was so surprised taht there was already a Creamy3 post here that I forgot to say: "Hey Scientizzle, long time no see! I hope things are well, and note that I ''might'', just ''might'' reconsider your proposal. Cheers!" ] (]) 23:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 19:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
::Yes, I've known about him since he popped up after Shamwow86 was blocked. I've been watching him as well as his other two open socks -- no particular problems so far -- so let's see whether he starts to cause trouble or not. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — ] ]</span> 07:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 17#Fools Rush In(song)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 00:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
:::Hi guys. I haven't been around much, but I've checked in on this occasionally. I expect the subject is savvy enough to have seen all our comment, so I'm sure he'll take note. I have no current intention to block {{user|Matthew Francis}}, because the account doesn't appear to have been at all disruptive, or {{user|Sally77}}, because that account hasn't edited since its creation. I'm treating this as a ''de facto'' that was requested. If, however, there's any indication that Mr. Francis slips into his ol' patterns of "tomfoolery", I won't hesitate to act as needed. It would be to everyone's benefit if we can move past this without further incident. — ]'']'' 16:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
:::PS-Kat, my offer still stands and you should feel free to message or email me if you'd like to go forward. Cheers, — ]'']'' 16:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 29#List of swears}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ]]] 16:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
::::I'm willing to allow one last chance, but do be aware that his edits aren't 100% tomfoolery-free: . Cheers, ] (]) 16:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] reincarnates as ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
FYI, back in 2006 you voted in a unanimous AfD '''DELETE''' for ], which has attempted at least twice to re-emerge with virtually no changes. It is now back again as ]. Here's the current AfD: ] —] (]) 07:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== blanking == |
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody blanked your talk page. I reverted it without checking what you had written. Sorry if I wasn't supposed to do that. ] (]) 21:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Don't worry about it--I appreciate your edit. I'm happy to let stupid insults remain as a testament to a vandal's immaturity, but blanking this page prevents proper communication & collaboration, so I prefer that sort of nonsense be reverted. — ]'']'' 21:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== SHH == |
|
|
|
|
|
I heard that I was going to die in 2048. Do you think about when you'll die a lot? How do you think you'll die? ] (]) 22:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:This is inappropriate -- at best it's trolling, at worst it's a death threat. The recent trolling efforts and attempts to add self-promotional content are over the line. For me, it is the third strike. I will support a block or a complete ban from WP. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — ] ]</span> 06:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Indeed. Mr. Francis, what was your goal here? I'm inclined to consider this trolling myself, considering you are (presumably) the author behind various and other directed towards just me. a to many other editors. Then there's other , trying to ], and creating pages for your ]. I think it's clear that although you appear to have broad knowledge of some of the less-appreciated elements of the film industry, your interactions are, on the whole, too disruptive to tolerate any longer. Please find a new hobby. — ]'']'' 16:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 
