Misplaced Pages

User talk:Domer48: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:05, 3 June 2009 editBigDunc (talk | contribs)Rollbackers16,576 edits →Filed a request for amendment to the Ireland arbitration case.: comment← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:46, 15 November 2024 edit undoIruka13 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,115 edits Notification: listing of File:Conn Colbert drilling instructor.jpg at WP:Files for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(796 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{retired}}
{{Off and On WikiBreak}}


'''I will not be editing much till around April, and may not respond swiftly if at all to queries. Regard, ] (])
] -- '''] will be removed with ]!'''
]





{{tmbox
| type = content
| image = ]
| style = width: 70%;
| textstyle = color: black; font-style: trebuchet;
| text = '''If you object to anything you read on this page, then the correct solution is to .}}

<span style="position:absolute;top:-76px;left:-180px;z-index:100">]</span>
*:::::::::::::'''Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten. *:::::::::::::'''Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.
{{sa-tutnumII-ubx}}
{{sa-veteran2-ubx}}
{{Veteran Editor II Ribbon}}
{{SA-veteranII}} {{SA-tutnumII|right}}


{|- {|-
Line 8: Line 28:
|} |}

{| class="infobox" width="315px" {| class="infobox" width="315px"
Line 18: Line 39:
# ] # ]
# ] # ]
# ] # ]
# ]
# ]
# ]


|} |}

===Useful links=== ===Useful links===
<!-- LINK DIV --><div style="background-color:#F0F8FF; border:1px solid #A9A9A9; padding:8px; text-align:center"> <!-- LINK DIV --><div style="background-color:#F0F8FF; border:1px solid #A9A9A9; padding:8px; text-align:center">
Line 30: Line 57:
'']'' ~ '']'' ~
'']'' ~ '']'' ~
'']'' ~
'']'' ~
'']'' ~ '']'' ~
'']'' ~ '']'' ~
Line 45: Line 70:
'']'' ~ '']'' ~
'']'' ~ '']'' ~
'''' ~

'']'' ~ '']'' ~
'']'' '']''
</font></div><!-- END LINK DIV --> </font></div><!-- END LINK DIV -->
<br> <br>

{{userlinks|Domer48}}

===Useful Noticeboard=== ===Useful Noticeboard===
<!-- LINK DIV --><div style="background-color:#F0F8FF; border:1px solid #A9A9A9; padding:8px; text-align:center"> <!-- LINK DIV --><div style="background-color:#F0F8FF; border:1px solid #A9A9A9; padding:8px; text-align:center">
Line 56: Line 85:
'']'' ~ '']'' ~
'']'' ~ '']'' ~
'']'' ~ '']'' ~
'']''
</font></div><!-- END LINK DIV --> </font></div><!-- END LINK DIV -->
<br> <br>


===Template messages===
==Newboy==
<!-- LINK DIV --><div style="background-color:#F0F8FF; border:1px solid #A9A9A9; padding:8px; text-align:center">
<font size=1>
'']'' ~
'']'' ~
'']'' ~
'']''


Format for reference
Cheers for the info Domer! ] (]) 21:25, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


<ref name="">{{cite book| last = | first = | title = | publisher = | year = | pages = | isbn = }}</ref>
== March 2009 ==


<ref name=""/>
Domer48, I have removed () your duplicate ] request (). Please do not disrupt the noticeboard by adding redundant requests. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 23:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


Template for Abcom / 1rr
:Per AE, it was a different request on a different article. I agree the request is now redundant as a result of your actions. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 23:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
-sanctions - add {{ }}
Troubles restriction - add {{ }}


</font></div><!-- END LINK DIV -->
::Oh, OK, that was not apparent from the request as it appeared on-screen. For the next time you want to request enforcement, please review my advice for how to compose proper AE requests at . <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 23:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
<br>

Will do, and thanks for the advice. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 00:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

==Arbcom case:The Troubles==
You've breached 1RR at ]. Ought you be reported to AE? ] (]) 17:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

:What for 1 revert? Have IQ's dropped? --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 17:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
::No, 2. Should I report you? ] (]) 19:40, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Well lets see the diff's then? --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
:, - shall I report you? ] (]) 10:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

:Like I said, nonsence! --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 08:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
::The word is "nonsense". ] (]) 10:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

You'd think you'd know what a breech of 1RR was at this stage! Go ahead and report, it will just add to your list of time wasting activities here on Wiki. Spelling mistakes! More "nonsense".--<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 17:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
:A revert is any action, including administrative actions, that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part. ] (]) 22:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

== Arbitration enforcement ==

You have been reported to ] for knowingly violating the ] ruling.--] (]) 16:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

:I have? Were? What page did I move? --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 16:31, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
::You've also breached 1RR on Troubles-related articles, and this has been noted to Arbcom. ] (]) 16:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

1RR is out the window! So I did not breached 1RR on Troubles-related articles. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 16:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
:When was it thrown out of the window? ] (]) 17:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Awhile back, check SirFozzie's talk page about it. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 17:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
::Funny, doesn't look much like "out the window" to me, looks more like Arbcom blessing it.--] (]) 17:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

I agree, looks more like Arbcom blessing it, but they haven't yet. I wish they would. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 17:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

===Block===
With your edit , you performed what amounted to a cut-and-paste move of ] to ], in violation of ] which forbids such moves. Since you appears intent on repeating this violation of an arbitral decision, I have blocked you for a week. I will lift the block, and I consent to another administrator lifting it, as soon as you give credible assurances that you will not repeat such moves, whether by means of the "move" function or by cut and paste. You may appeal this block as described at ]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

: This is an unfair block Sandstein I am not sure that Domer even thought that they were breaching any Sanctions, what about Conduct and decorum which has not been enforced with an editor on the talk twice being asked to cut out the personal attacks, are you not running to block them? A stern warning if needed was all that should have been used here not a week block. <strong>]</strong>] 20:31, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


*
:I have not moved any page, I removed text that was misleading on the ] article, after a good deal of discussion on the article talk page. The text I placed on the ] is accurate, subject pacific and covers the subject based on ] and according to our policy of ] two corner stones of wiki. The text I removed, I placed on the ] article. I did on the talk page discussion suggest leaving the text on the article, and was meet with a wall of silence. It was far from a cut and past job and involved a good deal of editing. I have not edited in violation of ] and I have not violated any of our policies. There is nothing in the above discussion which suggests that our policies can be violated, and no decision is going to suggest it either. Now '''I agree not to add any more content onto the Ireland''' and the ] is page protected for two weeks. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
*


::To make this clear, do you agree not to attempt to change the subject of the article ] from the island to the country until the conditions specified in ] are met? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


== Diff ==
YES! Clear enough? --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


{{collapse top | deletionists never sleep}}
:Thank you. You are unblocked. Please do not disobey arbitral decisions again, or you may be made subject to more substantial sanctions without further warning. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> -- ] 20:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
==Non-free rationale for File:Seán Mac Diarmada.JPG==
]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ], and edit it to include a ].


If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 09:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Well hit the unblock button, because I still can't edit. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 21:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
== Files missing description details ==
:There was an active IP autoblock that I just undid -- can you edit now? --] (]) 21:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


<div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;">'''Dear uploader:''' The media files you uploaded as:
Still blocked. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 21:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
*]
:Sorry, missed a step. Now?--] (]) 21:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.


If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for ],
== June 2009 ==
a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:1 week|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:refusing to acknowledge that ArbCom has set down the conditions for determining the names of the Ireland articles, as per |'''refusing to acknowledge that ArbCom has set down the conditions for determining the names of the Ireland articles, as per '''|repeated ]}}. You are welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. {{#if:true|] (]) 19:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 -->


If you have any questions, please see ]. Thank you. ] (]) 09:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC) </div><!-- Template:Add-desc-l -->
:That's a cheap move from you! You were asked to provide links for these directives, you can't so you block. What's next, Sandstein to come along and endorse it? --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
== Possibly unfree File:Conor Clune.JPG ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> ] (]) 21:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
== Possibly unfree File:Dick McKee.JPG ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> ] (]) 14:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
== Possibly unfree File:Peadar Clancy.JPG ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> ] (]) 10:21, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
{{collapse bottom}}


== howdy ==
::That's a fucking lie, and you know it! I gave an undertaking above, and I have not broken it. You are lying through your fucking teeth, in all your posts. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello Domer48, came over to invite you to a talkpage. Sorry to see you have retired, due to ahrbcohm drahmahz it looks like. ] applies, but if you do feel like returning, ping my talkpage, if you like. Thanks for your improvements to wikipedia in ages gone by; also, I appreciated the hummingbird. :-) &nbsp; Be well. &mdash; ] (]) 19:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
*SarekOfVulcan, this is a bit of a joke and way OTT. You are an involved admin and are in dispute with Domer and shouldnt be handing out a spurious block like this. Its pretty embarrassing to say the least.--] (]) 20:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


== Notification of automated file description generation ==
Vin, read , and they say there not involved. As the fucker were is the directive from ArbCom preventing talk page discussions. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.


This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
:I said . This process before the ArbCom even agreed to here the case. So were is the structure for determining the names of the disputed articles set up by ArbCom? That's disruptive? Check out the section titled , and check out on this? I said there is on article talk pages. If there is such a directive, provide a diff. Is that disruptive, were is the link? This is just typical of POV warriors riding rough shod over editors who dare challange them. I know Sandstein is going to come along now and back this fucker up. They are just as bad if not worse. There last block was just as bad as this one, again lying. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


*Another one of your uploads, ], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Issue with this block has been raised ]. <font color="green">]</font>] 20:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


*Another one of your uploads, ], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
:What did I tell you, . Never thought for one minute they would be pulled to account for their actions. The fucking arrogance, to drop a block and have not provided the editor with it before they were blocked. They would not even respond on that they had to go make up a rational, because editors and Admin's would see what a fucking joke they were. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:41, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
::Language, please. I can guarantee that you won't get unblocked the way you're going, so please stop before you say something you'll regret. <font color="green">]</font>] 20:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
::: I agree don't give them a way out Domer this is a piss poor block for asking a qusetion typical. <strong>]</strong>]


I'll take on board the advice, I've had two bad blocks in two days! Sandstein putting my block log up as some sort of mitigation, is there not a rule about using an editors block log. How do you think I should feel? They are a joke! --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
: We all know the great wiki lie about blocks being preventitive and not punitive this is prime example to prove that lie. <strong>]</strong>] 21:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


==File source problem with File:Charles Kerins.jpg==
Hang on here a minute, this is not it's an excuse! Were are not interested in a history lesson, were is the rational for this BS block! I was not being disruptive. I want answers to the questions I posed! They are running to catch a bus, they are alright. They are running to get a bigger shovel for the hole they are digging. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 21:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
]
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ].


If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion -->
: I'll have a go at answering your question:
* ''were is the structure for determining the names of the disputed articles set up by ArbCom?''
: ]. One was to ], and proved unsuccessful. Their back up was to ''"...designate a panel of three uninvolved administrators to develop and supervise an appropriate procedure."'' This they did, and an appropriate procedure was determined ''via engagement WikiProject Ireland Collaboration''. Sadly it also proved unsuccessful on the first attempt, so new supervisors were appointed and a discussion is currently ongoing ''at WikiProject Ireland Collaboration''. You could, of course, debate whether that is a "structure" which is "set up by ArbCom" - but semantics aside, ArbCom clearly put in place a remedy to determine a structure.
* ''That's disruptive?''
: A matter of opinion, of course. I - personally - don't consider that disruptive. Without speaking for the blocking admin, it appears to me he interpreted it as an effort to continue a campaign to move the article without consensus of ]. It was already been made clear to you (as a condition of being unblocked) that you should not continue with that effort. If his interpretation is correct, it could be considered as intent to disrupt.


Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 20:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
* ''Check out the section titled , and check out on this?''
==File source problem with File:Irish People Staff.JPG==
: Thats not really a question, but I checked those links and it appears to answer your previous question. They show that a structure was in place, directed by ArbCom and mediated by their appointed moderators.
]
* ''I said there is on article talk pages. If there is such a directive, provide a diff. Is that disruptive, were is the link?''
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ].
: There is no directive explicitly preventing discussion on article talk pages. There is an ArbCom-directed process though, and that is not on article talk pages. Therefore continuing to use article talk pages may not be disruptive ''per se'', but it is certainly lacking any constructive purpose. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 23:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion -->
=== Please calm down ===
I and others are reviewing this situation. However, you need to calm down and stop aggrivating it.


Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 21:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
I realize you're currently blocked so you can't edit your own talk. If you feel the need to send me a message my email is available. I am reviewing the talk page editing lock first, then the larger situation.


== Clarification motion ==
Thank you. ] (]) 23:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


A case (]) in which you were involved has been modified by {{oldid2|631252824|Motion|motion}} which changed the wording of the ] to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --]] 21:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
:Ok. Pursuant to discussion on ] and Sarek's agreement, I am undoing the talk page edit part of the block. For now I am leaving the main block duration as-is.
:This is contengent on you behaving adequately well during the discussion to follow. Please don't threaten anyone, that will result in a reblock. It would seriously help the tone of the conversation regarding reviewing the block if you can remain civil and refrain from any more profanity during the discussions. If you can stay calm and cooperate and discuss this constructively I think we can try and resolve more of it tomorrow.
:] (]) 01:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


== ] ==
Thanks for that Georgewilliamherbert! --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 12:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
== Why am I still Blocked ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692054221 -->
== ] listed for discussion ==
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. <!-- User:FastilyBot/Task12Note -->
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">ATTENTION</span>: This is an automated, ]-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details. Thanks, ] (]) 23:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
== File:Victory To the Prisoners Poster.JPG listed for discussion ==
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 04:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)


== ] of ] ==
I would like to know why I'm still blocked? --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 16:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
]
:George hasn't edited since last night, but I assume he'll be around later, since he mentioned "tomorrow" above. --] (]) 16:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
::Rockpocket, if you are still an Admin could you please, '''at once''', without argument: (1) Unblock Domer and (2) Block Sarek while we review his Admin rights. Such an egregious pov block from an involved Admin I have never seen - and I have sure seen some bad blocks in my time. ] (]) 17:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
SarekOfVulcan has acted throughout this whole affair in an arbitrary and arrogant manner and has attempted to insult the intelligence of both Admin’s and Editors alike. SarekOfVulcan removed and claimed that they were and that ArbCom had put a structure in place which did not allow for talk page discussion, and that if I "don't like it, take it to ]. They repeated these claims at Funny question to ask, when one reads their comments above. Now Sandstein endorsed this , which is not surprising, since . I’ll deal more with that block later, suffice to say it was a bad one.
<blockquote>Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
I , and . I pointed out that as they were , they should not have been the one to remove the discussion. Now SarekOfVulcan tried to suggest that they were not actively involved, pointing to their contributions, however they left out the three reverts , , they had made to the article, not to mention the block they were involved in. Their response to this was "?


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
SarekOfVulcan had , but rather than putting it in what they suggested was the right place they archived it? They then block me for asking them to support their claims.


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 04:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
This is all thrown into stark light, when one looks at there most recent contributions and . Obviously the most telling comments come from SarekOfVulcan themselves . So let’s recap, after reverting the article three times, getting me blocked, removing the discussion, blocking me themselves, blocking my talk page, they just decide they want to be an involved editor after all.
== ] of ] ==
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
Since the discussion on the ] talk page, I’ve had to contend with POV warriors and some personal abuse. While from some editors, (second paragraph) and offering mitigation, does bother me. Considering I was blocked once for calling someone a liar, I discovered, that this sanction is selective. Having been called it twice both and , to see SarekOfVulcan then , well what else can I expect? --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 18:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
::Certainly not justice or fair-play. The list of blocked/banned Irish editors grows and grows. ] (]) 18:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
== Filed a request for amendment to the Ireland arbitration case. ==


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> --] (]) 10:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
See ]. ] (]) 18:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


== File:Remember the POW&#39;s CD.JPG listed for discussion ==
:I'm blocked and I disagree hiding away this discussion. You want to insert an amendment that my blocker said was already there? --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 18:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 02:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
:: This proves that Sarek was wrong and that there was nothing from the arbs in relation to discusions taking place on the talk page. <strong>]</strong>] 18:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
:::I strongly oppose that suggestion. Anti-Irish censorship on Wiki in relation to British/ Irish disputes is already an abomination. Without adding more. ] (]) 18:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
:::It proves nothing of the sort. I only filed it to end the ongoing saga in a crystal clear manner. ] (]) 18:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
::::The admission by MacNee that Sarek was '''wrong '''is noted. Even if he was ''right'' it would still count as one of the worst and most malicious blocks I've seen. But now we see he was Wrong! ] (]) 18:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


== File:The damage caused by a RIRA bomb.jpg listed for discussion ==
So they can provide a diff for an ArbCom directive preventing talking about the Republic of Ireland article on the Republic of Ireland talk page. If they can, well block <s>everyone<s> Irish Editor who is on it now talking. That includes you Sarah and Dun, RedKing etc. --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 19:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 10:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
:Domer, since you're named in that request, if you have something reasonably short you'd like me to copy up to the page for consideration, I'll take care of it for you. Please mark it clearly, so I don't get the wrong text.--] (]) 19:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
== File:Conn Colbert drilling instructor.jpg listed for discussion ==
: It would be better if you undid your block so he could do it himself. <strong>]</strong>] 19:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> — Ирука<sup>]</sup> 11:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:46, 15 November 2024

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.

I will not be editing much till around April, and may not respond swiftly if at all to queries. Regard, Domer48 (talk)

-- Trolls will be removed with Extreme prejudice!

File:Animalibrí.gif



If you object to anything you read on this page, then the correct solution is to click here.

File:San patricios flag.jpg

  • Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.
This editor is a Grand Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain.
This editor is a Veteran Editor II and is entitled to display this Bronze Editor Star.
Veteran Editor II
Veteran Editor II
This editor is a
Veteran Editor II
and is entitled to display this
Bronze Editor Star.
This editor is a Grand Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain.
Today is 15 January 2025


Archive
Archives
  1. Archive 1 - February 2007 to December 2007
  2. Archive 2 - Jan 2008 to December 2008
  3. Archive 3 - Jan 2009 to December 2009
  4. Archive 4 - Jan 2010 to December 2010
  5. Archive 5 - Jan 2011 to December 2011
  6. Archive 6 - Jan 2012 to December 2012
  7. Archive 7


Useful links


Irish Manual of Style~ Policy ~ Assume good faith ~ Citing sources ~ Civility ~ Consensus ~ Dispute resolution ~ Etiquette ~ No original research ~ What Misplaced Pages is not ~ No personal attacks ~ Neutral point of view ~ POINT ~ Reliable sources ~ Verifiability ~ WP:Attribution ~ WP:Synthesis ~ tools ~ WP:Avoid peacock terms ~ Misplaced Pages:Avoid weasel terms


Domer48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Useful Noticeboard

3RR~ WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ~ Third opinion Noticeboard ~ Misplaced Pages:Honesty ~ Misplaced Pages:No original research/noticeboard


Template messages

Warning templates ~ Template messages/Sources of articles ~ Template messages/Cleanup ~ Template messages/Disputes

Format for reference

Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page).

Template for Abcom / 1rr -sanctions - add {{ }} Troubles restriction - add {{ }}


Diff

deletionists never sleep

MfD nomination of User:Domer48

User:Domer48, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Domer48 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Domer48 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- KC9TV 20:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Seán Mac Diarmada.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Seán Mac Diarmada.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Conor Clune.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Conor Clune.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dick McKee.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dick McKee.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Peadar Clancy.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peadar Clancy.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:21, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

howdy

Hello Domer48, came over to invite you to a talkpage. Sorry to see you have retired, due to ahrbcohm drahmahz it looks like. WP:REQUIRED applies, but if you do feel like returning, ping my talkpage, if you like. Thanks for your improvements to wikipedia in ages gone by; also, I appreciated the hummingbird.  :-)   Be well. — 74.192.84.101 (talk) 19:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bram Stoker's Home.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


File source problem with File:Charles Kerins.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Charles Kerins.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Irish People Staff.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Irish People Staff.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Clarification motion

A case (The Troubles) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Metal Easter Lily.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Metal Easter Lily.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Victory To the Prisoners Poster.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Victory To the Prisoners Poster.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Zerach (talk) 04:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Daithi O Conaill.JPG

Notice

The file File:Daithi O Conaill.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 04:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Grave Stone, Wolfe Tone Park, Dublin.jpg

Notice

The file File:Grave Stone, Wolfe Tone Park, Dublin.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 10:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Remember the POW's CD.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Remember the POW's CD.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

File:The damage caused by a RIRA bomb.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The damage caused by a RIRA bomb.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Conn Colbert drilling instructor.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Conn Colbert drilling instructor.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука 11:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  1. {{cite book}}: Empty citation (help)