| Revision as of 02:59, 4 June 2009 editNootherIDAvailable (talk | contribs)200 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:GAR/header}} <!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is close…' | Latest revision as of 23:17, 7 June 2009 edit undoGeometry guy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users31,032 editsm Move to next archive | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| : {{al|Homeopathy|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"></span> • ] | : {{al|Homeopathy|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"></span> • ] • ] | ||
| : {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Misplaced Pages|<span>|{{error:not substituted|GAR/result}}<span style="display:none;">}}] '''Result''': '''Procedural close'''. . Any other editor is welcome to nominate the article for reassessment if they believe it does not meet the criteria. '']'' 22:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)</span><br/> | |||
| : {{GAR/current}}<br/> | |||
| <!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is closed.--> | <!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is closed.--> | ||
| This article was nominated for being a Featured Article, but a lot of people opposed it. I now oppose it being a Good Article as well, for the same reasons-mainly because every sentence/statement is criticised and no defense is being allowed.-] (]) 02:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | This article was nominated for being a Featured Article, but a lot of people opposed it. I now oppose it being a Good Article as well, for the same reasons-mainly because every sentence/statement is criticised and no defense is being allowed.-] (]) 02:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *FA discussion can be seen . ] (]) 07:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| * NootherIDAvailable, can you explain with reference to the ] why this article should be delisted? '']'' 17:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment:''' I agree with {{user|Geometry guy}}. More specific comments from the GAR nominator regarding ] would be helpful here. ''']''' (]) 20:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:17, 7 June 2009
Homeopathy
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review • Previous GAR
- Result: Procedural close. Nominator blocked. Any other editor is welcome to nominate the article for reassessment if they believe it does not meet the criteria. Geometry guy 22:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
This article was nominated for being a Featured Article, but a lot of people opposed it. I now oppose it being a Good Article as well, for the same reasons-mainly because every sentence/statement is criticised and no defense is being allowed.-NootherIDAvailable (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- FA discussion can be seen here. Brunton (talk) 07:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- NootherIDAvailable, can you explain with reference to the good article criteria why this article should be delisted? Geometry guy 17:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: I agree with Geometry guy (talk · contribs). More specific comments from the GAR nominator regarding WP:WIAGA would be helpful here. Cirt (talk) 20:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)