Revision as of 11:12, 9 June 2009 editMusicInTheHouse (talk | contribs)2,744 edits →Cite tags: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:17, 7 November 2024 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators768,026 edits Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Category:Irish republicanism articles by importance.Tag: Twinkle |
(406 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{not around|3=24 August 2013}} |
|
<center> |
|
<center> |
|
|
{{tmbox |
|
|
| type = |
|
|
| image = ] |
|
|
| style = width: 90%; |
|
|
| textstyle = color: blue; font-style: Celtic; |
|
|
| text = Apparently racist abuse isn't grounds for blocking any more.... <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 19:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC)}} |
|
] |
|
] |
|
</center> |
|
</center> |
|
|
{{bots|deny=all}} |
|
|
==] nomination of ]== |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ]. |
|
== DYK for Downing Street mortar attack == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 03:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|] |
|
|
|On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. |
|
|
|} ] (]) 12:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Cite tags == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, just wondering since when is adding cite tags to text considered disrupting Misplaced Pages? I actually believe it is removing them that is considered vandalism. I have no issue in having them removed if a reason is actually given, rather than describing their addition as disruptive for no reason. Usually when something is mentioned the first time their is a citation, hence why the fact tags were added. Can you explain their removal?] 11:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
|